DOCSLIB.ORG

4. Strongly Urges 5. the State Party to Rescind Decree No. 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4. Strongly Urges 5. the State Party to Rescind Decree No. 1 4. Strongly urges the State Party to rescind Decree No. 1 “On the introduction of amendments to the list of activities prohibited in the Central Ecological Zone of the Baikal Natural Area”, which permits the disposal of wastewaters from paper mills into Lake Baikal; 5. Urges the State Party to immediately consider various mitigation scenarios for the mill, including rapidly developing and implementing a close-loop water system; 6. Encourages the State Party to develop and implement a long-term alternative livelihoods strategy for the town of Baikalsk, and notes that Lake Baikal has significant potential to develop sustainable tourism and other activities based on its natural and cultural values; 7. Reiterates its request to ensure long-term monitoring of the seal population and to halt illegal constructions on the shores of the Lake; 8. Requests the State Party to clarify the extent of the planned marina within the territory of the Republic of Buriatia and submit its Environmental Impact Assessment to the World Heritage Centre prior to granting permission for the development, in accordance with paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines; 9. Calls upon the Director of the UNESCO World Heritage Centre to convene a meeting with the Russian authorities and relevant stakeholders, in cooperation with IUCN, to identify how the impacts of the recently re-opened Baikalsk Paper and Pulp Mill on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property can be addressed; 10. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre a report, by 1 February 2011, on the state of conservation of the property, and in particular progress made in stopping the discharge of toxic water into Lake Baikal, addressing continuing high-levels of pollution in the Selenga River, developing a comprehensive tourism strategy for the property, and monitoring the Baikal seal population and the impacts of climate change on the property, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session in 2011. 23. Volcanoes of Kamchatka (Russian Federation) (N 765bis) Year of inscription on the World Heritage List 1996; extension 2001 Criteria (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) Year(s) of inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger N/A Previous Committee Decisions 30 COM 7B.25; 31 COM 7B.26; 32 COM 7B.23 International Assistance N/A UNESCO Extra-budgetary Funds N/A State of conservation of World Heritage properties WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, p. 40 inscribed on the World Heritage List Previous monitoring missions 1997: IUCN fact-finding mission; 2004: World Heritage Centre / IUCN mission; 2007: World Heritage Centre / IUCN mission Factors affecting the property identified in previous reports a) Illegal salmon fishing; b) Gold mining; c) Gas pipeline; d) Development of a geothermal power station; e) Forest fires; f) Boundary changes; g) Construction of the Esso-Palana road. Illustrative material http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/765 Current conservation issues The State Party submitted a detailed report on the state of conservation of the property dated 1 March 2010. This report provides an update on the implementation of the recommendations of the 2007 World Heritage Centre / IUCN reactive monitoring mission, particularly those aimed at strengthening the protection and management of the property, as well as clarification on the status of geological prospecting and mining within Bystrinsky National Park, a component of the serial property, as requested by Decision 32 COM 7B.23. The serial property is comprised of six protected areas, including two federal Nature Parks (Kronotsky State Biosphere Reserve and South-Kamchatka Sanctuary) and four National Parks (Nalychevo, Bystrinsky, Klyuchevskoy and South-Kamchatka). a) Legal protection and management The State Party reports on the implementation of the 2007 monitoring mission recommendation relating to protection and management of the property as follows: i) Establish an effective management structure for the entire property. The report notes that previously four Terrestrial State Institutions (TSIs) managed the four regionally administered Naturel Parks. These have been merged into a single ‘Volcanoes of Kamchatka’ TSI. The report also indicates that new Volcanoes of Kamchatka Regulations are being produced to improve the level of environmental protection of the property. According to the report this centralized management structure for the regionally administered components of the property will enhance their conservation and effective management and allow for the setting up of an improved monitoring structure. The report also announces the approval of new ‘Volcanoes of Kamchatka’ Regulations, which fix their specific protection and land use regime and regulates resource use restrictions for the 4 regionally administered nature parks. The report unfortunately provides no further details but IUCN has received information from other sources that the new regulations permit certain development activities which were previously banned, including geological prospecting and mining. The World Heritage Centre and IUCN are concerned by this information and recommend to request the State Party to submit copy of these regulations, in one of the working languages, to the World Heritage Centre as soon as possible. They note that the 2007 mission concluded that the protection status of the nature parks was not sufficient to protect their integrity and could allow certain activities that are incompatible with World Heritage status. Therefore the 2007 mission recommended State of conservation of World Heritage properties WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, p. 41 inscribed on the World Heritage List to upgrade them to National Parks, as originally foreseen in the nomination, or to revise their zoning, foreseeing adequate integrally protected zones to ensure conservation of the Outstanding Universal Value. The World Heritage Centre and IUCN consider that this issue needs to be addressed urgently. The World Heritage Centre and IUCN welcome the establishment of the centralized management structure for the 4 regional components of the property but reiterate the need to set up an overall coordination structure for the entire property, covering the two federal administered and the four regional administered components. ii) Develop an integrated management plan for the entire property. The report notes that an integrated management plan for the property is currently being drafted with the support of the UNDP/GEF project ”Demonstrating Sustainable Conservation of Biodiversity in Four Protected Areas in Russia’s Kamchatka Oblast” but is not yet finalised. However, it is not clear from the report if this plan will consider all 6 components of the property or only the 4 Nature Parks. The World Heritage Centre and IUCN reiterate that an overall management plan for the entire property is necessary, with management objectives based on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property. iii) Develop or revise the management plans for each of the component parks. The State Party reports that the management plans for all the component parks of the property have been updated. However, it is unclear whether the plans define their management objectives based on the Outstanding Universal Value and integrity of the property, as recommended by the 2007 mission nor how they will be resourced to ensure their implementation. It is also unclear whether the recently updated management plans for these parks include a revision of their zonation to better conserve their biodiversity values, as recommended by the 2007 mission. No information was provided on the recommendation of the 2007 mission to establish an access policy for the nature parks as part of their management plans. iv) Precisely set all boundaries for the property within the management plan through geo-referencing. The boundaries identified at the time of inscription were geo- referenced in 2009, as recommended by the 2007 mission. While no boundaries were changed, geo-referencing revealed that most of the property’s components are larger than originally indicated at the time of inscription: The World Heritage Centre and IUCN welcome this work and recommend the State Party to submit updated detailed maps of the entire property as soon as possible. v) Staffing and budgets of the property. The report provides information on the staffing of the property and the budgets of the 4 Nature Parks. The report notes that ranger numbers continue to be insufficient in relation to the size of the property. This is in particular the case for the nature parks. The report notes that to address this issue anti-poaching brigades were set up at the regional level, drawing on staff of other control agencies. Budgets of both the Federal and Regional components of the site also remain inadequate to meet management needs. b) Mining In 2009, the World Heritage Centre and IUCN noted NGO reports concerning plans to change the regulations of Bystrinsky National Park to allow geological prospecting, as well as plans to alter park boundaries in order to accommodate mining. The State Party confirms that no mining or geothermal projects is taking place in the property and that no geological prospecting has taken place in any of the component sites, nor is it foreseen in the future. The World Heritage Centre and IUCN welcome this confirmation but remain concerned about the new ‘Volcanoes of Kamchatka’ Regulations which according to information received by IUCN would permit geological prospecting within the Nature Parks. c) Salmon poaching State of conservation of World Heritage properties WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add, p. 42 inscribed on the World Heritage List While the State Party has not submitted a scientific report on the state of conservation of the salmon population across the property, information is provided on the current status of these populations and the impact of poaching. While salmon fishing is prohibited in the two federal protected areas, regulated commercial, sport and indigenous fishing are permitted in the Nature Parks in line with set quotas established by the Federal Fishing Agency (and not by the administration of the Nature Parks) at specific fishing sites.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
    Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • Pskov from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Pskov From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E Pskov (Russian: Псков; IPA: [pskof] ( listen), ancient Russian spelling "Плѣсковъ", Pleskov) is Navigation Pskov (English) a city and the administrative center of Pskov Oblast, Russia, located about 20 kilometers Псков (Russian) Main page (12 mi) east from the Estonian border, on the Velikaya River. Population: 203,279 (2010 [1] Contents Census);[3] 202,780 (2002 Census);[5] 203,789 (1989 Census).[6] - City - Featured content Current events Contents Random article 1 History Donate to Wikipedia 1.1 Early history 1.2 Pskov Republic 1.3 Modern history Interaction 2 Administrative and municipal status Help 3 Landmarks and sights About Wikipedia 4 Climate Community portal 5 Economy Recent changes 6 Notable people Krom (or Kremlin) in Pskov Contact Wikipedia 7 International relations 7.1 Twin towns and sister cities Toolbox 8 References 8.1 Notes What links here 8.2 Sources Related changes 9 External links Upload file Special pages History [edit] Location of Pskov Oblast in Russia Permanent link Page information Data item Early history [edit] Cite this page The name of the city, originally spelled "Pleskov", may be loosely translated as "[the town] of purling waters". Its earliest mention comes in 903, which records that Igor of Kiev married a [citation needed] Print/export local lady, St. Olga. Pskovians sometimes take this year as the city's foundation date, and in 2003 a great jubilee took place to celebrate Pskov's 1,100th anniversary. Create a book Pskov The first prince of Pskov was Vladimir the Great's younger son Sudislav.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Arc of Kamchatka: a Province with High-␦18O Magma Sources and Large-Scale 18O/16O Depletion of the Upper Crust
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 841–865, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd Pergamon Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0016-7037/04 $30.00 ϩ .00 doi:10.1016/j.gca.2003.07.009 Volcanic arc of Kamchatka: a province with high-␦18O magma sources and large-scale 18O/16O depletion of the upper crust 1, 2 3 1 ILYA N. BINDEMAN, *VERA V. PONOMAREVA, JOHN C. BAILEY, and JOHN W. VALLEY 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 2Institute of Volcanic Geology and Geochemistry, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia 3Geologisk Institut, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Received March 20, 2003; accepted in revised form July 16, 2003) Abstract—We present the results of a regional study of oxygen and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes of Pleistocene to Recent arc volcanism in the Kamchatka Peninsula and the Kuriles, with emphasis on the largest caldera- forming centers. The ␦18O values of phenocrysts, in combination with numerical crystallization modeling (MELTS) and experimental fractionation factors, are used to derive best estimates of primary values for ␦18O(magma). Magmatic ␦18O values span 3.5‰ and are correlated with whole-rock Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes and major elements. Our data show that Kamchatka is a region of isotopic diversity with high-␦18O basaltic magmas (sampling mantle to lower crustal high-␦18O sources), and low-␦18O silicic volcanism (sampling low-␦18O upper crust). Among one hundred Holocene and Late Pleistocene eruptive units from 23 volcanic centers, one half represents low-␦18O magmas (ϩ4 to 5‰). Most low-␦ 18O magmas are voluminous silicic ignimbrites related to large Ͼ10 km3 caldera-forming eruptions and subsequent intracaldera lavas and domes: Holocene multi-caldera Ksudach volcano, Karymsky and Kurile Lake-Iliinsky calderas, and Late Pleistocene Maly Semyachik, Akademy Nauk, and Uzon calderas.
    [Show full text]
  • From Sacred Cow to Cash Cow Muller, Martin
    From sacred cow to cash cow Muller, Martin License: Creative Commons: Attribution-NoDerivs (CC BY-ND) Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Müller, M 2014, 'From sacred cow to cash cow: the shifting political ecologies of protected areas in Russia', Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, vol. 58, no. 2-3, pp. 127-143. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Weathering of Volcanic Ash in the Cryogenic Zone of Kamchatka, Eastern Russia
    Clay Minerals, (2014) 49, 195–212 OPEN ACCESS Weathering of volcanic ash in the cryogenic zone of Kamchatka, eastern Russia 1, 2 E. KUZNETSOVA * AND R. MOTENKO 1 SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, Trondheim, NO-7465, Norway, and 2 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia (Received 8 August 2012; revised 28 August 2013; Editor: Harry Shaw) ABSTRACT: The nature of the alteration of basaltic, andesitic and rhyolitic glass of Holocene and Pleistocene age and their physical and chemical environments have been investigated in the ash layers within the cryogenic soils associated with the volcanoes in the central depression of Kamchatka. One of the main factors controlling the alteration of the volcanic glass is their initial chemistry with those of andesitic (SiO2 =53À65 wt.%) and basaltic (SiO2 < 53 wt.%) compositions being characterized by the presence of allophane, whereas volcanic glass of rhyolitic composition (SiO2>65 wt.%) are characterized by opal. Variations in the age of eruption of individual ashes, the amount and nature of the soil water, the depth of the active annual freeze-thawing layer, the thermal conductivity of the weathering soils, do not play a controlling role in the type of weathering products of the ashes but may affect their rates of alteration. KEYWORDS: volcanic ash, allophane, opal, unfrozen water, thermal conductivity, permafrost, Kamchatka. The highly active volcanic area of Kamchatka in local and remote eruptions and from the secondary eastern Russia is part of the circum-Pacific belt of re-deposition of ash (Bazanova et al., 2005). andesitic volcanism. It is situated north of the 49th Considerable research has been carried out on the parallel of latitude and is characterized by a weathering of volcanic glass.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace in Palestine Via the World Heritage Convention
    . Michael K. Madison II. Peace in Palestine ..........through World Heritage Promoting Peace via Global Conventions - 1 - Peace in Palestine via the World Heritage Convention Promoting Peace via Global Conventions The Global Problem "Throughout history, religious differences have divided men and women from their neighbors and have served as justification for some of humankind's bloodiest conflicts. In the modern world, it has become clear that people of all religions must bridge these differences and work together, to ensure our survival and realize the vision of peace that all faiths share." -- H.R.H. Prince El-Hassan bin Talal, Jordan Moderator, WCRP Governing Board Tolerance, Economic Growth and Fear Global peace and harmony is not possible without religious tolerance. Unfortunately, there is no instant microwavable solution. We can’t just add water and/or milk to the current situation and hope that the world will ameliorate itself overnight. No. The world needs help. The problem is not the outliers; it is larger groups of people that need to change. Outliers will always be present. The world needs religious-minded policymakers to take giant steps that lead to peace, but in a mutually beneficial way. Indeed, peace for peace’s sake is not always enough incentive to all parties involved. Therefore, if the conflict cannot be resolved by tolerance, then let it be resolved by greed as we find a way to help the countries involved to achieve a better economic position. If the conflict cannot be resolved by boosting the corresponding economies, then let it be resolved by fear as we convince the nations involved that one false move means it will be - 2 - their country against the rest of the world and not just their “enemy of the day”.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory
    The Alaska Volcano Observatory is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys . The Alaska Volcano Observtory is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program and the State of Alaska. 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Southeast flank of Augustine Volcano showing summit steaming, superheated fumarole jet, and ash dusting on snow. View is toward the northwest with Iniskin Bay in the distance. Photograph taken by Chris Waythomas, AVO/USGS, December 20, 2005. 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory By R.G. McGimsey, C.A. Neal, J.P. Dixon, U.S. Geological Survey, and Sergey Ushakov, Institute of Volcanology and Seismology The Alaska Volcano Observatory is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophuysical Surveys. The Alaska Volcano Observatory is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program and the State of Alaska. Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2014
    IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2014 A conservation assessment of all natural World Heritage sites About IUCN environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2014 together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with more than 1,200 government and A conservation assessment of all natural NGO Members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over World Heritage sites www.iucn.org About the IUCN World Heritage Programme IUCN is the advisory body on nature to the UNESCO World Heritage Committee. Working closely with IUCN Members, Commissions and Partners, and especially the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), and with a range of partners, IUCN’s World Heritage Programme evaluates new sites nominated to the World Heritage List, monitors the conservation of listed sites, promotes the World Heritage Convention as a leading global instrument for conservation, and provides support, advice and training to site managers, governments, scientists and local communities. The IUCN World Heritage Programme also initiates innovative ways to enhance the role of the World Heritage Convention in protecting the planet’s biodiversity and natural heritage and positioning the worlds’ most iconic places as exemplars of nature-based solutions to global challenges. www.iucn.org/worldheritage IUCN WORLD HERITAGE oUTLOOK 2014 Disclaimers Contents The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or other participating organizations concerning the 4 Foreword legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Вместежурнал Русской Диаспоры В Словакии Вместе Русский Журнал В Словакии R U S K Ý Č a S O P I S N a S L O V E N S K U
    ВМЕСТЕЖУРНАЛ РУССКОЙ ДИАСПОРЫ В СЛОВАКИИ вместе РУССКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ В СЛОВАКИИ R U S K Ý Č A S O P I S N A S L O V E N S K U № 5 / 2019 ФЕСТИВАЛЬ РУССКОГО КЛАССИЧЕСКОГО БАЛЕТА В БРАТИСЛАВЕ ИНТЕРВЬЮ С ПРИМА-БАЛЕРИНОЙ, ДИРЕКТОРОМ ТЕАТРА «MOSCOW STATE BALLET» ЛЮДМИЛОЙ ТИТОВОЙ «Нам, всем русским, надо поддерживать русскую классику, иначе это может уйти в прошлое...» # 5 / 2019 1 вместе Č A S O P I S R U S K E J N Á R O D N O S T N E J M E N Š I N Y N A S L O V E N S K U На первых трех местах рей- музыки «Посольство мастер- СОБЫТИЯ тинга оказались три амери- ства». Выступили лауреаты канских Университета. На международных конкурсов первом месте – Гарвардский. Тимофей Доля (фортепиано) и Камиль Мухаметдинов (виолончель). Молодые музы- канты виртуозно исполнили произведения С. Рахманино- ва, П. Чайковского, Д. Шоста- ковича и др. Текст: Сергей Баженов, Radio Среди гостей присутствовали Slovakia International представители дипкорпуса, Текст: Сергей Баженов, Radio деятели словацкой культуры и Slovakia International Университет Коменского в искусства, наши соотечествен- Фото: Ян Борбели Братиславе в последнем, так ники. Проект «Посольство называемом московском мастерства» не оставляет По случаю начала нового рейтинге, включающем в публику равнодушной. Гости учебного года Министр себя 1200 университетов из Текст и фото: РЦНК с восторгом прослушали образования и науки СР 79 стран, занял 351 место, что Концерт «Посольство мастер- классические произведения Мартина Любиова выступила подтвеждает его лидерские ства» снова в Братиславе в исполнении российских с обращением к учителям и позиции среди словацких музыкантов.
    [Show full text]
  • KULTURNÍ DĚDICTVÍ RUSKA a BOSNY a HERCEGOVINY 2020 BŘEZEN - ZÁŘÍ 2020 Festival 7
    Uherské Hradiště, Staré Město, Velehrad, Zlín, Hodonín, Boskovice, Mikulčice, Holíč, Kopčany, ... KULTURNÍ DĚDICTVÍ RUSKA A BOSNY A HERCEGOVINY 2020 BŘEZEN - ZÁŘÍ 2020 festival 7. Dny slovanské kultury 2020 21. - 30. května 2020 www.dny-slovanske-kultury.cz 1 PODSTATA A STRATEGIE Mezinárodní festival DNY SLOVANSKÉ KULTURY vznikl v roce 2013 - v roce 1150. výročí příchodu sv. Cyrila a Metoděje na Velkou Moravu. Jeho cílem bylo postupně představit kulturní dědictví všech slovanských zemí, národů a národností. Od druhého ročníku festivalu začala tradice představit kulturní dědictví DVOU slovanských národů či národností - jedné zastupujících severní Slovany a druhou pak zastupující Slovany jižní. Od roku 2017 se festival rozdělil do dvou částí - na část festivalovou, druhá pak na část výstavní. Výstavní část nabízí dlouhodobé výstavy ve významných kulturních institucích (některé trvající až 4 měsíce), druhá část festivalová pak trvá asi týden a nabídne další aktivity - divadelní, filmové, hudební, přednáškové … Výsledky dosavadních šesti ročníků festivalu potvrdily zájem významných domácích i zahraničních institucí podpořit tento strategický cíl a vytvořit tak prostor pro prezentaci kulturního dědictví slovanských národů a národností. Festivalová část pak nabídne většinou zahájení a vernisáže dlouhodobých výstav, přednášky, ale i vystoupení hudebních skupin. Festivalový program pak doplňujeme prezentací kulturního dědictví v oblasti filmu, literatury a divadla. hlavní strategiké cíle • PREZENTACE KULTURNÍHO DĚDICTVÍ - h​lavní důraz je kladen na propagaci k​ulturního dědictví aktuálně vybraných dvou slovanských národů či národností, především památek zapsaných na seznam UNESCO • KULTURNÍ MOST MEZI JIHEM A SEVEREM – je základem festivalové dramaturgie a konečného výběru dvou slovanských zemí - vždy jedné z oblasti Severních Slovanů a druhů z oblasti Jižních. Festival tak přirozeně vytváří “most” pro posilování další vzájemné aktivní spolupráce.
    [Show full text]
  • Inbar Et Al., 2011, Holocene Cinder Cones... (Jody)
    Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 201 (2011) 301–311 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jvolgeores Morphometric and morphological development of Holocene cinder cones: A field and remote sensing study in the Tolbachik volcanic field, Kamchatka Moshe Inbar a,⁎, Michael Gilichinsky b, Ivan Melekestsev c, Dmitry Melnikov c, Natasha Zaretskaya d a Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Haifa, Israel b Department of Forest Resource Management, SLU, Umea, Sweden c Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, RAS, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia d Geological Institute, RAS, Moscow, Russia article info abstract Article history: The evolution of landscape over time is a central aspect of geological, paleogeographical and Received 14 January 2010 geomorphological studies. Volcanic features like cinder cones offer the opportunity to monitor the processes Accepted 18 July 2010 and development of the landscape. Cinder cones are perhaps the simplest and most common volcanic Available online 24 July 2010 landforms in the world. Morphological and morphometric study of cinder cones has proven an efficient tool for determining their relative dates, and the erosional processes affecting them. The extensive Kamchatka Keywords: volcanic province (Russian Far East), with its large Tolbachik cinder cone field, is an excellent case study for Kamchatka volcanic province fi Tolbachik eruption spatial and temporal classi cation and calibration of changes in morphometric values with time. cinder cones We show how the morphological and morphometric values of the monogenetic cinder cones, measured in morphometry the field and by digital elevation models, can be used to validate their age and erosional processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports on the State of Conservation of Properties Contained in This Document
    World Heritage 36 COM WHC-12/36.COM/7B Paris, 11 May 2012 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-sixth session Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation 24 June – 6 July 2012 Item 7B of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of World Heritage properties inscribed on the World Heritage List SUMMARY This document contains information on the state of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List. The World Heritage Committee is requested to review the reports on the state of conservation of properties contained in this document. In certain cases, the World Heritage Committee may wish to decide to discuss in detail the state of conservation reports which are submitted for adoption without discussion. Decision required: The World Heritage Committee may wish to adopt the draft Decision presented at the end of each state of conservation report. The full reports of reactive monitoring missions requested by the World Heritage Committee are available at the following Web address in their original language: http://whc.unesco.org/en/sessions/36COM/ Table of content I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 5 ELABORATION OF THE STATE OF CONSERVATION REPORTS ..................................... 6 STRUCTURE OF THE DOCUMENT ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]