Weathering of Volcanic Ash in the Cryogenic Zone of Kamchatka, Eastern Russia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weathering of Volcanic Ash in the Cryogenic Zone of Kamchatka, Eastern Russia Clay Minerals, (2014) 49, 195–212 OPEN ACCESS Weathering of volcanic ash in the cryogenic zone of Kamchatka, eastern Russia 1, 2 E. KUZNETSOVA * AND R. MOTENKO 1 SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, Trondheim, NO-7465, Norway, and 2 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia (Received 8 August 2012; revised 28 August 2013; Editor: Harry Shaw) ABSTRACT: The nature of the alteration of basaltic, andesitic and rhyolitic glass of Holocene and Pleistocene age and their physical and chemical environments have been investigated in the ash layers within the cryogenic soils associated with the volcanoes in the central depression of Kamchatka. One of the main factors controlling the alteration of the volcanic glass is their initial chemistry with those of andesitic (SiO2 =53À65 wt.%) and basaltic (SiO2 < 53 wt.%) compositions being characterized by the presence of allophane, whereas volcanic glass of rhyolitic composition (SiO2>65 wt.%) are characterized by opal. Variations in the age of eruption of individual ashes, the amount and nature of the soil water, the depth of the active annual freeze-thawing layer, the thermal conductivity of the weathering soils, do not play a controlling role in the type of weathering products of the ashes but may affect their rates of alteration. KEYWORDS: volcanic ash, allophane, opal, unfrozen water, thermal conductivity, permafrost, Kamchatka. The highly active volcanic area of Kamchatka in local and remote eruptions and from the secondary eastern Russia is part of the circum-Pacific belt of re-deposition of ash (Bazanova et al., 2005). andesitic volcanism. It is situated north of the 49th Considerable research has been carried out on the parallel of latitude and is characterized by a weathering of volcanic glass. For volcanic ash soils severely cold climate with permafrost widespread in warm humid climates Wada & Wada (1977) above an altitude of 700 m. The Kamchatka suggested that the sequence of weathering is peninsula is blanketed by a soil-pyroclastic cover volcanic glass ? allophane ? halloysite or (Melekestsev et al., 1969) consisting of loose, volcanic glass ? opal ? allophane ? halloysite. pyroclastic material from explosive eruptions and For the rhyolitic glass in the humid conditions in buried soil beds. Ashes from major eruptions form Japan, the allophane ? halloysite transformation clear marker horizons and can be traced over wide occurs after 6000 years (Wada & Wada, 1977; areas. This has allowed a well defined tephro- Nagasawa, 1978; Wada, 1989). However, other stratigraphy to be established that is based upon the studies have shown that, depending on their chemical signature of the glass (Braitseva et al., different glass compositions, volcanic ash may 1997). Between the key ash marker horizons are weather directly to halloysite as well as to other pyroclastic deposits derived from both minor allophane (Parfitt et al., 1983; Parfitt & Wilson, 1985). Basaltic glass (SiO2:Al2O3 <4)hasan intrinsically smaller molar Si:Al ratio and a soft and porous structure that favours weathering at a much * E-mail: [email protected] higher rate than rhyolitic glass (SiO2:Al2O3 =5to DOI: 10.1180/claymin.2014.049.2.04 6) (Lowe, 1986). # 2014 The Mineralogical Society Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/claymin/article-pdf/49/2/195/3301715/gsclaymin.49.2.04-kuz_OA.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 196 E. Kuznetsova and R. Motenko The influence of climatic variation on the There are from six to eight soil profiles weathering of volcanic glass is still to be clarified, developed in the soil-pyroclastic cover associated particularly in the extremely cold climates asso- with these volcanoes. In each there is an organic ciated with high precipitation. In this paper we horizon that overlies volcanic ash. The soils have a report on our study of the breakdown of volcanic small humus content ~ 1 to 2.4%, which is not glass in the soil-pyroclastic cover associated with typical for most volcanic soils of Kamchatka the Klyuchevskaya group of volcanoes situated in (Zakharikhina, 2009); this reflects the interplay of the Central Depression of Kamchatka (55À56ºN, permafrost, relatively low rainfall and the abundant 160À161ºE). The group consists of several active deposition of airborne volcanic material. volcanoes (Klyuchevskoy (~4800 m), Bezymianny (~2900 m), Ushkovsky (~3900 m), Plosky ANALYTICAL METHODS. Tolbachik (~3100 m) plus ten others that are not active today, together with numerous small cinder A total of 24 samples (Table 1) were collected at cones, extrusive domes and other volcanic features elevations between 130 and 1630 m. Samples 1-6 (Braitseva et al., 1995). It is the location where the were collected from the active layer in the thawed Large Fissure Tolbachik Eruption took place in state, sample 7 in the frozen state from a depth of 1975 and 1976, during which about 500 km2 were 2.50 m in a drill hole and other samples from the covered by scoria and ash and 3 new cinder cones frozen active layer. and lava fields were formed (Fedotov & Markhinin, The moisture content (ratio of the mass of water 1983). to the mass of dry sample) was determined by The climate of the study area is characterized by drying the wet samples at 105ºC for 12 h. Adsorbed cold winters, as well as mild and wet summers that water was determined by drying samples to constant are mainly influenced by cyclonic activity. No weight from room temperature to 105ºC. permanent meteorological station exists in the Thermal studies (TG, DTG, DTA analyses) were mountainous areas, but the Klyuchi station (WMO carried out using a Q-1500D derivatograph over the 32389), situated in the Kamchatka river valley at an range from room temperature to 1000ºC with a elevation of 29 m and about 30À40 km from the heating rate of 20ºC/min (Topor et al., 1987). The central part of volcanic area, provides a long-term loss of absorbed (low) water over the range from climatic record for the region. The mean annual room temperature to 110ºC was observed on the average temperature in Klyuchi is À0.7ºC for heating curves of the samples (3, 4, 8, 9, 13, 15, 17, 1910À2007 and ~0ºC for 1970À2007. The total 24), and the endothermic effects recorded over the annual precipitation in Klyuchi is ~500 mm, range from 110 to 750ºC corresponded to the loss whereas in the mountains it is estimated to be of structural (high) water by the ash material. The ~1000 mm (Muravyev, 1999). In Klyuchi the snow total mass loss (structural water + absorbed water) cover usually lasts from October to June with a is designated as Wterm and its values are shown in snow cover thickness of ~1.5À3 m in forested areas Table 6. and 50À80 cm or less in open areas due to From the weight difference between the wet and redistribution by strong winds (Abramov et al., dried sample and the volumes of the sample, the dry 2008). bulk density and water content were calculated. Permafrost and periglacial processes are wide- Solid particle density (mineral density of rock) was spread. The lower boundary of the permafrost is at measured for rock powder on an exclusive device 750À900 m above sea level for the northern slopes ELA (Kalachev et al., 1997). The underlying and 650À800 m for the southern ones. Numerous principle of this device is the law of Boil-Moriotte solifluction lobes, clay cryoturbation spots, poly- (pressure6volume = constant in an isothermal gonal structures, and areas of sorted ground occur environment); the accuracy is 0.02 g/cm3. between altitudes of 1000 and 1700 m. The Particle-size distribution patterns were deter- thickness of the seasonal freezing-thawing active mined for most samples by a combination of layer decreases with increasing altitude and may sieving and the pipette method after dispersion vary slightly from year to year. The maximum with sodium hexametaphosphate. seasonal melting of permafrost is up to 2.5 m at Chemical analysis was restricted to several 900 m and 50 cm at 2500 m (Abramov et al., representative samples based on their similar 2008). stratigraphical positions in comparative marker Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/claymin/article-pdf/49/2/195/3301715/gsclaymin.49.2.04-kuz_OA.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 on 24 September 2021 by guest Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/claymin/article-pdf/49/2/195/3301715/gsclaymin.49.2.04-kuz_OA.pdf TABLE 1. Location, volcanic source, age and physical characteristics of the ash samples. Sample Sampling point Source Tephra Height Depth Mean age, 14C Moisture Absorbed Dry density, Solid particles no. volcano index (m) (m) years content moisture rd, density, rs 3 3 W (%) Wg (%) (g/cm ) (g/cm ) 1 0.2 1500 38 2.04 1.1 2.69 3 0.55 1500 64 4.3 0.9 2.70 Tolbachinskiy Pass À* À* 1630 5 0.75 1500 31 1.67 1.3 2.73 7 2.5 1500 30 1.24 1.5 2.80 2 Near Large Fissure 0.2 35 21 0.3 1.1 2.52 8 Tolbachik Eruption Tolbachik À* 1330 0.5 35 À* À* À* À* cones (LFTE) 4 Cones in the Kamen 0.15 ND 21 0 1.3 2.64 À* À* 1000 6 Volcano area 0.4 ND 13 0.2 1.5 2.71 9 Moraine complex of the Khangar Khg 0.36 6850 42 1.32 0.9 2.47 Bilchinok glacier, right 10 695 slope of the bold À* À* 0.56 ~7500 37 1.94 1.3 2.79 mountain 11 Moraine complex, right Sh2 0.45 950 32 0.46 1.1 2.66 12 slope of the Bilchinok Shiveluch Sh3 746 0.70 1400 36 0.81 1.1 2.61 glacier valley 13 Sh5 1.2 2550 32 1.0 1.1 2.52 14 À* À* 1.15 ~6000 34 3.94 0.9 2.79 15 Left slope of the Khangar Khg 1.32 6850 36 2.52 0.8 À Bilchinok glacier 16 À* À*290 1.5 6850À8300 42 4.14 0.9 2.1 valley, at the forest 17 boundary Shiveluch Sh8300 1.71 8300 11 1.67 1.0 2.71 18 À* À* 1.8 ~9000 69 7.3 0.8 2.46 19 Seismic station on Shiveluch Sh 2 0.65 950 32 0.3 1.0 2.68 20 Podkova, Klyuchevskoy 800 0.85 31 0.79 1.1 2.75 Klyuchevskoy À* 950À400 21 volcano slope 1.17 30 0.87 0.9 2.74 22 Shiveluch Sh2 1.1 950 43 0.32 1.5 2.58 Nappe Apakhonchich 800 23 Ksudach KS-1 2.2 1800 51 0.56 1.1 2.68 24 Kamchatka river valley, À* À* 130 5.2 Q2 À* 0.93 À* 2.45 steep bank ‘Krutoy" 1 * the specified volcanic ashes do not form key beds because they are the products of minor or remote eruptions.
Recommended publications
  • A Dangling Slab, Amplified Arc Volcanism, Mantle Flow and Seismic Anisotropy in the Kamchatka Plate Corner
    AGU Geodynamics Series Volume 30, PLATE BOUNDARY ZONES Edited by Seth Stein and Jeffrey T. Freymueller, p. 295-324 1 A Dangling Slab, Amplified Arc Volcanism, Mantle Flow and Seismic Anisotropy in the Kamchatka Plate Corner Jeffrey Park,1 Yadim Levin,1 Mark Brandon,1 Jonathan Lees,2 Valerie Peyton,3 Evgenii Gordeev ) 4 Alexei Ozerov ,4 Book chapter in press with "Plate Boundary Zones," edited by Seth Stein and Jeffrey Freymuller Abstract The Kamchatka peninsula in Russian East Asia lies at the junction of a transcurrent plate boundary, aligned with the western Aleutian Islands, and a steeply-dipping subduction zone with near-normal convergence. Seismicity patterns and P-wave tomography argue that subducting Pacific lithosphere terminates at the Aleutian junction, and that the downdip extension (>150km depth) of the slab edge is missing. Seismic observables of elastic anisotropy (SKS splitting and Love-Rayleigh scattering) are consistent \Vith asthenospheric strain that rotates from trench-parallel beneath the descending slab to trench-normal beyond its edge. Present-day arc volcanism is concentrated near the slab edge, in the Klyuchevskoy and Sheveluch eruptive centers. Loss of the downdip slab edge, whether from thermo-convective or ductile instability, and subsequent "slab-window" mantle return flow is indicated by widespread Quaternary volcanism in the Sredinny Range inland of Klyuchevskoy and Sheveluch, as well as the inferred Quaternary uplift of the central Kamchatka depression. The slab beneath Klyuchevskoy has shallower dip (35°) than the subduction zone farther south (55°) suggesting a transient lofting of the slab edge, either from asthenospheric flow or the loss of downdip load.
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmed Soc Reports List 2015-2016
    Confirmed State of Conservation Reports for natural and mixed World Heritage sites 2015 - 2016 Nr Region Country Site Natural or Additional information mixed site 1 LAC Argentina Iguazu National Park Natural 2 APA Australia Tasmanian Wilderness Mixed 3 EURNA Belarus / Poland Bialowieza Forest Natural 4 LAC Belize Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System Natural World Heritage in Danger 5 AFR Botswana Okavango Delta Natural 6 LAC Brazil Iguaçu National Park Natural 7 LAC Brazil Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Natural Emas National Parks 8 EURNA Bulgaria Pirin National Park Natural 9 AFR Cameroon Dja Faunal Reserve Natural 10 EURNA Canada Gros Morne National Park Natural 11 AFR Central African Republic Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 12 LAC Costa Rica / Panama Talamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad Natural National Park 13 AFR Côte d'Ivoire Comoé National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 14 AFR Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 15 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Garamba National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 16 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Kahuzi-Biega National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 17 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Okapi Wildlife Reserve Natural World Heritage in Danger 18 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Salonga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 19 AFR Democratic Republic of the Congo Virunga National Park Natural World Heritage in Danger 20 AFR Democratic
    [Show full text]
  • Pskov from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Pskov From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E Pskov (Russian: Псков; IPA: [pskof] ( listen), ancient Russian spelling "Плѣсковъ", Pleskov) is Navigation Pskov (English) a city and the administrative center of Pskov Oblast, Russia, located about 20 kilometers Псков (Russian) Main page (12 mi) east from the Estonian border, on the Velikaya River. Population: 203,279 (2010 [1] Contents Census);[3] 202,780 (2002 Census);[5] 203,789 (1989 Census).[6] - City - Featured content Current events Contents Random article 1 History Donate to Wikipedia 1.1 Early history 1.2 Pskov Republic 1.3 Modern history Interaction 2 Administrative and municipal status Help 3 Landmarks and sights About Wikipedia 4 Climate Community portal 5 Economy Recent changes 6 Notable people Krom (or Kremlin) in Pskov Contact Wikipedia 7 International relations 7.1 Twin towns and sister cities Toolbox 8 References 8.1 Notes What links here 8.2 Sources Related changes 9 External links Upload file Special pages History [edit] Location of Pskov Oblast in Russia Permanent link Page information Data item Early history [edit] Cite this page The name of the city, originally spelled "Pleskov", may be loosely translated as "[the town] of purling waters". Its earliest mention comes in 903, which records that Igor of Kiev married a [citation needed] Print/export local lady, St. Olga. Pskovians sometimes take this year as the city's foundation date, and in 2003 a great jubilee took place to celebrate Pskov's 1,100th anniversary. Create a book Pskov The first prince of Pskov was Vladimir the Great's younger son Sudislav.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Arc of Kamchatka: a Province with High-␦18O Magma Sources and Large-Scale 18O/16O Depletion of the Upper Crust
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 841–865, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd Pergamon Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0016-7037/04 $30.00 ϩ .00 doi:10.1016/j.gca.2003.07.009 Volcanic arc of Kamchatka: a province with high-␦18O magma sources and large-scale 18O/16O depletion of the upper crust 1, 2 3 1 ILYA N. BINDEMAN, *VERA V. PONOMAREVA, JOHN C. BAILEY, and JOHN W. VALLEY 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 2Institute of Volcanic Geology and Geochemistry, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia 3Geologisk Institut, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Received March 20, 2003; accepted in revised form July 16, 2003) Abstract—We present the results of a regional study of oxygen and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes of Pleistocene to Recent arc volcanism in the Kamchatka Peninsula and the Kuriles, with emphasis on the largest caldera- forming centers. The ␦18O values of phenocrysts, in combination with numerical crystallization modeling (MELTS) and experimental fractionation factors, are used to derive best estimates of primary values for ␦18O(magma). Magmatic ␦18O values span 3.5‰ and are correlated with whole-rock Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes and major elements. Our data show that Kamchatka is a region of isotopic diversity with high-␦18O basaltic magmas (sampling mantle to lower crustal high-␦18O sources), and low-␦18O silicic volcanism (sampling low-␦18O upper crust). Among one hundred Holocene and Late Pleistocene eruptive units from 23 volcanic centers, one half represents low-␦18O magmas (ϩ4 to 5‰). Most low-␦ 18O magmas are voluminous silicic ignimbrites related to large Ͼ10 km3 caldera-forming eruptions and subsequent intracaldera lavas and domes: Holocene multi-caldera Ksudach volcano, Karymsky and Kurile Lake-Iliinsky calderas, and Late Pleistocene Maly Semyachik, Akademy Nauk, and Uzon calderas.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Precursors and Dynamics of the 2012-13 Basaltic
    Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 299 (2015) 19–34 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jvolgeores Overview of the precursors and dynamics of the 2012–13 basaltic fissure eruption of Tolbachik Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia Alexander Belousov a,⁎,MarinaBelousovaa,BenjaminEdwardsb, Anna Volynets a, Dmitry Melnikov a a Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia b Dickinson College, PA, USA article info abstract Article history: We present a broad overview of the 2012–13 flank fissure eruption of Plosky Tolbachik Volcano in the central Received 14 January 2015 Kamchatka Peninsula. The eruption lasted more than nine months and produced approximately 0.55 km3 DRE Accepted 22 April 2015 (volume recalculated to a density of 2.8 g/cm3) of basaltic trachyandesite magma. The 2012–13 eruption of Available online 1 May 2015 Tolbachik is one of the most voluminous historical eruptions of mafic magma at subduction related volcanoes glob- ally, and it is the second largest at Kamchatka. The eruption was preceded by five months of elevated seismicity and Keywords: fl Kamchatka ground in ation, both of which peaked a day before the eruption commenced on 27 November 2012. The batch of – – 2012–13 Tolbachik eruption high-Al magma ascended from depths of 5 10 km; its apical part contained 54 55 wt.% SiO2,andthemainbody – fi Basaltic volcanism 52 53 wt.% SiO2. The eruption started by the opening of a 6 km-long radial ssure on the southwestern slope of Eruption dynamics the volcano that fed multi-vent phreatomagmatic and magmatic explosive activity, as well as intensive effusion Eruption monitoring of lava with an initial discharge of N440 m3/s.
    [Show full text]
  • From Sacred Cow to Cash Cow Muller, Martin
    From sacred cow to cash cow Muller, Martin License: Creative Commons: Attribution-NoDerivs (CC BY-ND) Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Müller, M 2014, 'From sacred cow to cash cow: the shifting political ecologies of protected areas in Russia', Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, vol. 58, no. 2-3, pp. 127-143. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace in Palestine Via the World Heritage Convention
    . Michael K. Madison II. Peace in Palestine ..........through World Heritage Promoting Peace via Global Conventions - 1 - Peace in Palestine via the World Heritage Convention Promoting Peace via Global Conventions The Global Problem "Throughout history, religious differences have divided men and women from their neighbors and have served as justification for some of humankind's bloodiest conflicts. In the modern world, it has become clear that people of all religions must bridge these differences and work together, to ensure our survival and realize the vision of peace that all faiths share." -- H.R.H. Prince El-Hassan bin Talal, Jordan Moderator, WCRP Governing Board Tolerance, Economic Growth and Fear Global peace and harmony is not possible without religious tolerance. Unfortunately, there is no instant microwavable solution. We can’t just add water and/or milk to the current situation and hope that the world will ameliorate itself overnight. No. The world needs help. The problem is not the outliers; it is larger groups of people that need to change. Outliers will always be present. The world needs religious-minded policymakers to take giant steps that lead to peace, but in a mutually beneficial way. Indeed, peace for peace’s sake is not always enough incentive to all parties involved. Therefore, if the conflict cannot be resolved by tolerance, then let it be resolved by greed as we find a way to help the countries involved to achieve a better economic position. If the conflict cannot be resolved by boosting the corresponding economies, then let it be resolved by fear as we convince the nations involved that one false move means it will be - 2 - their country against the rest of the world and not just their “enemy of the day”.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory
    The Alaska Volcano Observatory is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys . The Alaska Volcano Observtory is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program and the State of Alaska. 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Southeast flank of Augustine Volcano showing summit steaming, superheated fumarole jet, and ash dusting on snow. View is toward the northwest with Iniskin Bay in the distance. Photograph taken by Chris Waythomas, AVO/USGS, December 20, 2005. 2005 Volcanic Activity in Alaska, Kamchatka, and the Kurile Islands: Summary of Events and Response of the Alaska Volcano Observatory By R.G. McGimsey, C.A. Neal, J.P. Dixon, U.S. Geological Survey, and Sergey Ushakov, Institute of Volcanology and Seismology The Alaska Volcano Observatory is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophuysical Surveys. The Alaska Volcano Observatory is funded by the U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program and the State of Alaska. Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5269 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2014
    IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2014 A conservation assessment of all natural World Heritage sites About IUCN environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2014 together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with more than 1,200 government and A conservation assessment of all natural NGO Members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over World Heritage sites www.iucn.org About the IUCN World Heritage Programme IUCN is the advisory body on nature to the UNESCO World Heritage Committee. Working closely with IUCN Members, Commissions and Partners, and especially the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), and with a range of partners, IUCN’s World Heritage Programme evaluates new sites nominated to the World Heritage List, monitors the conservation of listed sites, promotes the World Heritage Convention as a leading global instrument for conservation, and provides support, advice and training to site managers, governments, scientists and local communities. The IUCN World Heritage Programme also initiates innovative ways to enhance the role of the World Heritage Convention in protecting the planet’s biodiversity and natural heritage and positioning the worlds’ most iconic places as exemplars of nature-based solutions to global challenges. www.iucn.org/worldheritage IUCN WORLD HERITAGE oUTLOOK 2014 Disclaimers Contents The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or other participating organizations concerning the 4 Foreword legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Remote Sensing Reveals Communication Between
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Thermal remote sensing reveals communication between volcanoes of the Klyuchevskoy Volcanic Group Diego Coppola1,2*, Marco Laiolo1,2, Francesco Massimetti1,3, Sebastian Hainzl3, Alina V. Shevchenko3,4, René Mania3, Nikolai M. Shapiro5,6 & Thomas R. Walter3 Volcanoes are traditionally considered isolated with an activity that is mostly independent of the surrounding, with few eruptions only (< 2%) associated with a tectonic earthquake trigger. Evidence is now increasing that volcanoes forming clusters of eruptive centers may simultaneously erupt, show unrest, or even shut-down activity. Using infrared satellite data, we detail 20 years of eruptive activity (2000–2020) at Klyuchevskoy, Bezymianny, and Tolbachik, the three active volcanoes of the Klyuchevskoy Volcanic Group (KVG), Kamchatka. We show that the neighboring volcanoes exhibit multiple and reciprocal interactions on diferent timescales that unravel the magmatic system’s complexity below the KVG. Klyuchevskoy and Bezymianny volcanoes show correlated activity with time-predictable and quasiperiodic behaviors, respectively. This is consistent with magma accumulation and discharge dynamics at both volcanoes, typical of steady-state volcanism. However, Tolbachik volcano can interrupt this steady-state regime and modify the magma output rate of its neighbors for several years. We suggest that below the KVG the transfer of magma at crustal level is modulated by the presence of three distinct but hydraulically connected plumbing systems. Similar complex interactions may occur at other volcanic groups and must be considered to evaluate the hazard of grouped volcanoes. Closely located or clustered volcanoes may become conjointly active and are hence considered especially haz- ardous, yet robust evidence for their connectivity remains sparse.
    [Show full text]
  • "Constraints on the Potential Subsurface Area of Disruption
    CONSTRAINTS ON THE POTENTIAL SUBSURFACE AREA OF DISRUPTION ASSOCIATED WITH YUCCA MOUNTAIN REGION BASALTIC VOLCANOES Prepared for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contract NRC-02-93-005 Prepared by Brittain Hill Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses San Antonio, Texas November 1996 3/193 ABSTRACT Determining the subsurface area that a basaltic volcano can disrupt is a key parameter in calculating the amount of high-level radioactive waste that conceivably can be transported into the accessible environment. Although there is evidence that some Quaternary Yucca Mountain region (YMR) volcanoes disrupted anomalously large amounts of subsurface rock, the volume of disruption cannot be calculated directly. An analog volcanic eruption at Tolbachik volcano in Kamchatka, however, provides critical constraints on the subsurface area potentially disrupted by basaltic cinder cones. During a 12 hr period of the 1975 Tolbachik eruption, 2.8x10 6 m3 of subsurface rock was brecciated and ejected from the volcano. Using geologic and geometric constraints, this volume represents a circular diameter of disruption of 49±7 m. An unusual type of volcanic bomb was produced during this disruptive event, which contains multiple subsurface rock types that each show a range in thermal effects. These bombs represent the mixing of different stratigraphic levels and significant distances outward from the conduit during a single event. The same type of unusual volcanic bomb is found at Lathrop Wells and Little Black Peak volcanoes in the YMR. In addition, Lathrop Wells and to a lesser extent Little Black Peak have anomalously high subsurface rock-fragment abundances and are constructed of loose, broken tephra. These characteristics strongly suggest that subsurface disruptive events analogous to that at 1975 Tolbachik occurred at these YMR volcanoes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alaska Volcano Observatory - 20 Years of Volcano Research, Monitoring, and Eruption Response
    http://www.dggs.dnr.state.ak.us Vol. 11, No. 1, March 2008 THE ALASKA VOLCANO OBSERVATORY - 20 YEARS OF VOLCANO RESEARCH, MONITORING, AND ERUPTION RESPONSE Since 1988, the Alaska Volcano Observatory (AVO) has been monitoring volcanic activity across the state, conducting scientifi c research on volcanic processes, producing volcano-hazard assessments, and informing both the public and emergency managers of volcanic unrest. Below are some examples of the activity at Alaska’s volcanoes that have held the attention of AVO staff. 1977 photo (a) 1989-90, Redoubt (b) 1992, Bogoslof (c) 1992, Spurr (d) 1992, (e) 1993, Seguam Westdahl 2002 photo (f) 1994, Kanaga (g) 1996, Akutan (h) 1996, Pavlof (i) 1997, Okmok (j) 1998, Korovin (k) 1999, Shishaldin (l) 2004-06, Spurr (m) 2005, Veniaminof (n) 2005, Chiginagak (o) 2006, Augustine (p) 2006, Cleveland (q) 2006, Fourpeaked (r) 2007, Pavlof Photo credits: (a) J. Warren, (b) T. Keith, USGS, (c) R. McGimsey, USGS, (d) C. Dau, USFWS, (e) U.S. Coast Guard (1977 photo), (f) E. Klett, USFWS, (g) R. McGimsey, USGS, (h) S. Schulmeister, (i) J. Freymueller, UAF/GI, (2002 photo), (j) R. McGimsey, USGS, (k) C. Nye, ADGGS, (l) D. Schneider, USGS, (m) K. Wallace, USGS, (n) J. Schaefer, ADGGS, (o) C. Read, USGS, (p) NASA, (q) K. Lawson, (r) C. Waythomas, USGS. To see more photographs of Alaska volcanoes and learn more about these eruptions and others, visit the Alaska Volcano Observatory website at www.avo.alaska.edu. MONITORING THE ACTIVE VOLCANOES OF ALASKA BY JANET SCHAEFER AND CHRIS NYE INTRODUCTION Active volcanoes in Alaska? Yes! In fact, there are more than in the last few thousand years exist in southeastern Alaska and 50 historically active volcanoes in Alaska.
    [Show full text]