DOCSLIB.ORG

Rail Map 2018-2020.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rail Map 2018-2020.Pdf To To BIA To To To To To To Kansas To Witchita, KS Independence, KS Kansas Kansas To Topeka, KS Witchita, KS (BNGR) Wellington, KS City, MO Pueblo, CO To Dodge City, KS Wellington, KS City, MO City, MO BNSF /4 S. Coffeyville Tyrone ¤£81 UP «¬99 SKOL /4 ¤£281 «¬8 BNSF UP Quapaw /4 ¤£287 «¬34 «¬58 Braman ¨¦§44 ¤£54 ¤£183 Capron /4 Renfrow /4 Copan ¤£56 ¤£64 ¤£270 «¬11 GRANT BNGR «¬10 BNSF ¤£64 /4 /4 UP Welch «¬3 Gate ¤£283 WOODS 132 Newkirk «¬10 BNSF «¬95 136 Hooker ¤£64 «¬ KAY «¬10 Lenapah /4 Miami «¬10C CVR «¬ /4 Buffalo ALFALFA To ¤£64 UP /4 «¬11A ¨¦§35 OSAGE /4 TEXAS Alva BNSF Keyes «¬8 «¬18 Springfield, MO «¬325 ¤£64 Beaver ¤£64 «¬11 «¬11 Kildare «¬99 Narcissa ¤£385 /4 ¤£64 «¬14 ¤£64 «¬11 /4 Blackwell /4 Kaw City Dewey Bluejacket /4 /4 «¬34 Medford /4 NOW ATA /4Wyandotte £ Optima ¤£183 «¬11 /4 44 ¤£412 ¤64 /4 «¬46 «¬14 Cherokee Ponca ¤£60 «¬35 ¨¦§/4 «¬94 ¤£270 «¬74 «¬11 «¬2 Fairland Boise ¤£83 ¤£281 «¬132 Jefferson City /4 Nowata CRAIG Afton ¬149 UP /4 Tonkawa Pawhuska Bartlesville ¤£60 « HARPER «¬50 ¤£64 «¬38 ¤£60 ¤£60 City «¬95 Guymon BEAVER ¤£60 /4 «¬11 /4 OTTAWA CIMARRON «¬3 «¬23 ¤£64 /4 ¤£60 Vinita ¤£283 /4 BNSF Pond Creek «¬28 White ¤£69 «¬171 ¤£54 Dacoma «¬11 ¤£75 «¬10 ¤£270 «¬3 ¤£270 «¬74 ¤£77 BNSF «¬18 «¬123 SKOL Oak ¤£59 ¤£64 ¬136 ¤£412 ¤£412 Carmen /4 Goodwell /4 « ¤£60 «¬11 /4 «¬85A «¬25 /4 Waynoka «¬45 /4 Helena Ochelata Chelsea ¤£412 385 £287 Kremlin /4 Marland ¤£ ¤ 132 ¬156 WASHINGTON «¬85 ¤£56 «¬34 /4 «¬ /4 « Talala /4 Big Cabin Texhoma /4 /4 /4 BNSF /4 «¬10 «¬46 BNSF Carrier ¤£81 «¬99 Ramona SKOL /4 ¤£283 NOKL «¬8B Goltry GARFIELD «¬15 «¬18 Foyil «¬82 To Amarillo, TX Red Rock (BNSF) Mooreland ¤£281 «¬45 /4 Oologah ¨¦§44 «¬28 «¬74 /4 «¬20 Vera /4 Adair Jay «¬16 /4 /4 N. Enid «¬11 /4 /4 /4 ¤£412 «¬8 «¬58 /4 UP Bushyhead «¬20 «¬20 £60 ¤£64 ¤£64 NOBLE «¬15 ROGERS To Tucumcari, NM Fargo Woodward «¬50 ¤£412 ¤£60 ¤£412 ¤ ¤£412 PAWNEE Sequoyah /4 Enid «¬20 /4 UP MAYES «¬10 ¬ ¤£412 /4Fairmont Pawnee «¬99 Collinsville «¬82 «3 ¨¦§35 /4 N E W M E X I C O W N E Gage ¤£60 «¬58 Covington BNSF Owasso Pryor /4 «¬15 /4 BNSF «¬20 «¬20 ¤£281 Drummond /4 BNSF /4 ¤£64 /4 Claremore DELAWARE /4 Waukomis /4 Perry SKOL Mid-American /4 WOODWARD MAJOR Fairview Morrison ¤£64 «¬11 «¬116 Shattuck Ames /4 Lucien Hallett /4 Tiawah ÎÏ Industrial «¬132 UP /4 ¤£412 /4 Sand Park «¬34 ¤£270 ¤£60 «¬58 ¤£64 412 «¬8 GNBC Bison «¬74 Glencoe Springs Chouteau ¤£ «¬46 ¤£183 /4 «¬86 «¬48 /4 Catoosa /4 /4 SS £412 ¤£59 UP ¤ «¬51 /4 «¬51 ¤£60 Orlando Stillwater SLWC Tulsa /4 ¤£60 Vici «¬51A /4 Mazie To Joplin, MO 270 «¬58 /4 «¬51 «¬51 /4 «¬51 Inola /4 Watts BNSF Arnett ¤£ Okeene Hennessey /4 «¬51 «¬51 Mannford BNSF UP /4 To «¬18 «¬99 «¬10 ELLIS Taloga «¬51 /4 ¤£81 /4 Mulhall «¬48 (TSU) Broken Arrow «¬82 Amarillo, TX BNSF PAYNE Sapulpa TSU KCS ¤£283 Canton Drumright Jenks /4 «¬34 «¬3 «¬74D Cushing WAG ON E R Westville ¤£183 /4 Wagoner /4 /4 Dover «¬33 «¬18 /4 /4 ¤£64 Coweta CHEROKEE BLAINE Kellyville UP (BNSF) ¬51 ¤£62 «¬74C 35 /4 « DEWEY ¤£281 ¨¦§«¬33 /4 /4 Bixby «¬51 «¬74 Kiefer /4 UP KINGFI SHER ¤£177 «¬18 «¬72 UP Watonga «¬99 CREEK /4 Porter «¬80 Tahlequah «¬51 OKLAHOMA «¬105 SLWC TULSA Redbird /4 Okay GNBC «¬33 /4 ¤£59 «¬47 ¤£281 «¬3 «¬33 Mounds (BNSF) /4 /4 Kingfisher /4 £62 Stilwell «¬51 «¬33 «¬47 BNSF Tullahassee ¤ Guthrie LOGAN LINCOLN /4 Bristow «¬82 «¬30 UP Stroud Depew ¤£64 /4 Fort Gibson «¬100 «¬34 «¬47 ATLT Greenfield ¤£77 Chandler Beggs Muskogee /4 Thomas /4 «¬16 «¬16 /4 Wellston /4 BNSF /4 Okarche «¬165 ROGER MILLS ¤£183 «¬54 £281 BNSF Edmond /4 ¤£62 CUSTER ¤ CANADIAN Luther /4 /4 Davenport «¬52 Braggs «¬82 ADAIR «¬33 /4 SLWC «¬48 Summit /4 UP 2018-2020 STATE ¬ /4 Custer City ATLT /4 ¨¦§44 Warwick Okmulgee /4 Cheyenne «33 UP Calumet OKL AHOMA «¬10A «¬47 GNBC «¬58 ATLT /4 ¤£177 ¤£377 Marble KCS ¤£59 Geary /4 «¬18B MUSK OGEE «¬44 Arapaho FMRC Bridgeport SLWC «¬102 «¬56 /4 Oktaha City /4 «¬3 ¨¦§44 OKM ULGEE «¬73 /4 UP Yukon «¬72 Gore /4 (AOK) Schulter /4 /4 «¬73 §40 /4 Spencer «¬99 OKFUSKEE BNSF ¤£69 Rentiesville £ Vian SEQUOYAH STATE ¨¦ ¤64 «¬30 ¨¦§40 Weatherford El Reno /4 ¤£62 /4 ¤£266 ¤£283 FMRC /4 ¤£62 ¤£62 /4 /4 Sallisaw Clinton ¤£270 /4 Harrah /4 «¬64B «¬34 «¬18 Okemah Henryetta Webbers To UP Choctaw /4 ¤£266 UP RAILROAD MAP Elk City /4 Foss UP Oklahoma /4 ¨¦§40 Checotah Falls Roland Little «¬54 «¬58 281 Mustang McLoud BNSF £ 40 «¬152 /4 ¤£ ¤62 ¨¦§ 150 /4 Rock, AR «¬6 /4 Canute «¬37 Union City /4 City /4 «¬ Gans /4 ¤£64 FMRC Bessie /4 /4 Shawnee UP /4 /4 «¬54A BNSF ¨¦§40 ¨¦§40 Muldrow ¬6 (SLWC) Dale Weleetka «¬30 « ÎÏ «¬8 «¬4 99A ¤£183 «¬152 «¬37 Moore (BNSF) «¬ «¬27 /4 Sayre «¬54 BNSF /4 /4 Earlsboro «¬84 Eufaula Clinton-Sherman Cordell /4 /4 «¬56 «¬48 MCINTOSH «¬71 «¬2 Industrial Minco Tuttle Stigler ¤£59 FMRC /4 Dill Norman Seminole «¬9 «¬34 Park «¬9 ¤£270 BNSF «¬9 «¬9 Spiro ¤£271 City /4 /4 £ /4 ¨¦§40 CADDO Pocasset «¬9 ¤69 «¬9 /4 WASHITA ¤£62 UP Wetumka «¬52 Rock /4 Erick «¬6 ¨¦§44 «¬76 «¬9 ¤£177 «¬9A Yeager Island /4 BECKHAM «¬115 «¬146 /4 Canadian «¬31 Panama /4 Sentinel /4 /4 Rocky «¬54 ¤£281 /4 Sooner Noble /4 HASKELL KCS /4 Wewoka HUGHES /4 /4 ¬30 ¤£283 «¬9 Verden UP 35 /4 Shady Cameron « Anadarko ¨¦§ Crowder «¬71 «¬31 FMRC «¬9 «¬9 /4 ¤£277 ¬113 «¬31 Point «¬9 «¬9B ¤£62 «¬56 Holdenville « Lone «¬24 CLEVELAND Poteau Hobart SLWC Chickasha «¬39 Purcell ¬ Wolf «¬39 «59 Spaulding /4 ¤£283 «¬58 ¤£281 UP Fanshawe Wister «¬83 GREER /4 «¬39 Red Oak KIOWA /4 SEMINOLE McAlester «¬2 /4 /4 «¬9 Cement Ninnekah POTTAWATOMIE «¬56 /4 Howe MCCLAIN /4 Sasakwa «¬1 /4 End Of GNBC /4 ¤£270 UP Alderson AOK «¬19 Apache /4 Wayne ¤£270 KCS Line «¬9 «¬6 «¬19 «¬19 /4 «¬19C /4 /4 Cyril ¨¦§44 UP «¬59 Haileyville Wilburton «¬82 Heavener /4 Mangum Roosevelt /4 (AOK) AOK «¬128 ¤£283 /4 «¬19 «¬59A Francis «¬31 /4 ¤£271 /4 Paoli ¬133 «¬3E /4 Savanna /4 (ARS) «¬30 «¬19 /4 «¬19 /4 « ¤£75 Hartshorne «¬54 «¬115 Fletcher GRADY Lindsay «¬34 «¬58 UP «¬19 «¬1 UP /4 Blair ¤£183 /4 «¬17 /4 Elgin Rush Springs Pauls Valley «¬48 LEFLORE FMRC Kiowa HARMON Mountain «¬76 «¬74 ¤£177 PITTSBURG LATIMER KCS COMANCHE «¬31 /4 «¬1 To Park SLWC «¬65 PON TOTOC «¬63 H&E /4 BNSF «¬2 Shreveport, LA ¤£62 (SLWC) Altus «¬115 Fitzhugh BNSF ¤£59 ¤£62 (SLWC) Wynnewood /4 «¬131 Hollis /4 Cache ¤£62 «¬29 /4 ¤£271 «¬63 «¬63 /4 /4 «¬29 «¬76 /4 «¬3 COAL BNSF Headrick Snyder /4 Roff JACKSON SLWC «¬7 «¬7 /4 Marlow Indiahoma Lawton ¤£77 377 ¤£69 «¬43 «¬5 Olustee ¤£ £259 Sulphur /4 Hickory Coalgate ¤ /4 WTJR GARVIN Ada ¬43 £271 «¬144 BNSF Duncan «¬7 « «¬2 ¤ FMRC «¬5 /4 «¬5C /4 Manitou «¬43 Elmer /4 «¬7 ¤£75 /4 Tipton «¬36 Davis «¬48 «¬31B /4 ¤£283 44 «¬65 «¬7 ¬99 Stringtown Eldorado GNBC ¨¦§ /4 « ¤£271 «¬4 «¬6 Dougherty «¬7D «¬5 UP MURRAY /4 /4 Mill Creek Walters STEPHENS «¬76 ¤£177 Atoka Hollister «¬5 «¬53 «¬7 PUSHMATAHA ¤£259 Frederick UP «¬53 UP To WTJR /4 ¤£281 «¬53 Loveland Gene /4 BNSF /4 Amarillo, TX /4 Temple ¤£81 Comanche ÎÏ JOHNSTON Tushka /4 Autry ¤£75 MCCURTAIN TILLMAN «¬5A /4 Ardmore Tishomingo «¬3 Grandfield Hastings Addington CARTER Industrial Ravia Antlers ¤£183 ¤£70 /4 «¬89 «¬76 ¤£77 /4 /4 Caney /4 WTJR /4 Airport «¬48 Ardmore «¬78 «¬3 Devol /4 COTTON «¬199 «¬22 ¤£69 ATOKA ¤£259 £ Waurika ¤£70 KRR ¤70 ¤£70 ¤£70A «¬3 ¤£177 ¤£377 «¬22 ¤£271 £ /4 Caddo To Wichita ¤70 Madill «¬199 «¬78 CHOCTAW TO&E Wright City Falls, TX Sugden /4 WFEC Eagletown JEFFERSON KRR Boswell Swink /4 BNSF /4 Armstrong Bokchito Hugo /4 To Shreveport, LA Ryan /4 MARSHALL Mead /4 /4 /4 /4 «¬76 /4 Soper Fort /4 (DQE) Broken TO&E ¤£81 «¬32 /4 ¤£70 /4 /4 /4 LOVE Kingston /4 Bennington ¤£70 Towson Valliant Garvin Bow (DQE) Marietta /4 Durant Blue /4 ¤£70 UP «¬32 New KRR The Heartland Flyer making its way between Oklahoma City and Fort Worth. The Heartland Flyer had 66,000 riders in 2016 and early returns for 2017 suggest «¬96 «¬109 /4 Grant KRR «¬99 Woodville /4Calera «¬70E Idabel ridership will top 70,000 for the year. The Heartland Flyer makes a daily round trip between Oklahoma City and Fort Worth, Texas with stops at Norman, Purcell, /4 Terral «¬3 Pauls Valley, Ardmore, and Gainsville seven days a week. UP /4 Haworth FOR RESERVATIONS: 1-800-USA-RAIL or AMTRAK.COM FOR INFORMATION AND EVENTS: WWW.HEARTLANDFLYER.COM To ¨¦§35 KRR Ft. Worth, TX Colbert BRYAN /4 ¤£259 To Shreveport, LA Thackerville UP To BNSF «¬78 /4 Ft. Worth, TX BNSF To «¬3 Dallas, TX «¬87 To Ft. Worth, TX To This map, printed by University of Oklahoma Printing Services, is issued by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation as authorized Paris, TX by the Director of Transportation. 10,000 copies have been printed and distributed at a cost of approximately $0.4295 per copy. SYMBOL CLASS I RAILROADS MILEAGE SYMBOL CLASS III RAILROADS MILEAGE TO&E TEXAS, OKLAHOMA & EASTERN RR. 40 DQE DeQUEEN & EASTERN RAILROAD 0 +40 ORM OKLAHOMA RAILROAD MUSEUM 4 Mileage figures indicate total mainline miles owned BNSF RAILWAY 966 STILLWATER CENTRAL RAILROAD AUSTIN, TODD & LADD RAILROAD BLACKWELL NORTHERN GATEWAY RR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amtrak's Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads
    Amtrak’s Rights and Relationships with Host Railroads September 21, 2017 Jim Blair –Director Host Railroads Today’s Amtrak System 2| Amtrak Amtrak’s Services • Northeast Corridor (NEC) • 457 miles • Washington‐New York‐Boston Northeast Corridor • 11.9 million riders in FY16 • Long Distance (LD) services • 15 routes • Up to 2,438 miles in length Long • 4.65 million riders in FY16 Distance • State‐supported trains • 29 routes • 19 partner states • Up to 750 miles in length State- • 14.7 million riders in FY16 supported3| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads Amtrak Route System Track Ownership Excluding Terminal Railroads VANCOUVER SEATTLE Spokane ! MONTREAL PORTLAND ST. PAUL / MINNEAPOLIS Operated ! St. Albans by VIA Rail NECR MDOT TORONTO VTR Rutland ! Port Huron Niagara Falls ! Brunswick Grand Rapids ! ! ! Pan Am MILWAUKEE ! Pontiac Hoffmans Metra Albany ! BOSTON ! CHICAGO ! Springfield Conrail Metro- ! CLEVELAND MBTA SALT LAKE CITY North PITTSBURGH ! ! NEW YORK ! INDIANAPOLIS Harrisburg ! KANSAS CITY ! PHILADELPHIA DENVER ! ! BALTIMORE SACRAMENTO Charlottesville WASHINGTON ST. LOUIS ! Richmond OAKLAND ! Petersburg ! Buckingham ! Newport News Norfolk NMRX Branch ! Oklahoma City ! Bakersfield ! MEMPHIS SCRRA ALBUQUERQUE ! ! LOS ANGELES ATLANTA SCRRA / BNSF / SDN DALLAS ! FT. WORTH SAN DIEGO HOUSTON ! JACKSONVILLE ! NEW ORLEANS SAN ANTONIO Railroads TAMPA! Amtrak (incl. Leased) Norfolk Southern FDOT ! MIAMI Union Pacific Canadian Pacific BNSF Canadian National CSXT Other Railroads 4| Amtrak Amtrak’s Host Railroads ! MONTREAL Amtrak NEC Route System
    [Show full text]
  • Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas
    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 ▪ FINAL REPORT▪ August 2017 Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D. Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D. Lisa Shofstall Kansas State University Transportation Center 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) August 2017 Railcar Operational Status in Kansas 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 7 Performing Organization Report Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D., Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D., Lisa Shofstall No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Transportation Center Department of Civil Engineering 11 Contract or Grant No. 2109 Fiedler Hall C2069 Manhattan, Kansas 66506 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Research Final Report 2300 SW Van Buren October 2015–December 2016 Topeka, Kansas 66611-1195 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0691-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. The rail industry’s recent shift towards larger and heavier railcars has influenced Class III/short line railroad operation and track maintenance costs. Class III railroads earn less than $38.1 million in annual revenue and generally operate first and last leg shipping for their customers. In Kansas, Class III railroads operate approximately 40 percent of the roughly 2,800 miles (4,500 km) of rail; however, due to the current Class III track condition, they move lighter railcars at lower speeds than Class I railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Thanniv Ersary
    Spring 2011 • $7 95 FSharing tihe exr periencste of Fastest railways past and present & rsary nive 40th An Things Were Not the Same after May 1, 1971 by George E. Kanary D-Day for Amtrak 5We certainly did not see Turboliners in regular service in Chicago before Amtrak. This train is In mid April, 1971, I was returning from headed for St. Louis in August 1977. —All photos by the author except as noted Seattle, Washington on my favorite train to the Pacific Northwest, the NORTH back into freight service or retire. The what I considered to be an inauspicious COAST LIMITED. For nearly 70 years, friendly stewardess-nurses would find other beginning to the new service. Even the the flagship train of the Northern Pacific employment. The locomotives and cars new name, AMTRAK, was a disappoint - RR, one of the oldest named trains in the would go into the AMTRAK fleet and be ment to me, since I preferred the classier country, had closely followed the route of dispersed country wide, some even winding sounding RAILPAX, which was eliminat - the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804, up running on the other side of the river on ed at nearly the last moment. and was definitely the super scenic way to the Milwaukee Road to the Twin Cities. In addition, wasn’t AMTRAK really Seattle and Portland. My first association That was only one example of the serv - being brought into existence to eliminate with the North Coast Limited dated to ices that would be lost with the advent of the passenger train in America? Didn’t 1948, when I took my first long distance AMTRAK on May 1, 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Eagle® Heartland Flyer®
    2009 ® 26, TEXAS EAGLE OCTOBER And HEARTLAND FLYER® Effective SM journey. the Enjoy TEXAS EAGLE® serving CHICAGO - ST. LOUIS - LITTLE ROCK DALLAS - FORT WORTH - SAN ANTONIO 1-800-USA-RAIL LOS ANGELES Call And intermediate stations HEARTLAND FLYER® serving OKLAHOMA CITY - FORT WORTH And intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form P21–200M–10/26/09 Stock #02-3670 TEXAS EAGLE HEARTLAND FLYER Chicago • St. Louis • Little Rock • Dallas • Oklahoma City • Fort Worth Fort Worth • San Antonio • Los Angeles 821 ᮤ Train Number ᮣ 822 21/421 ᮤ Train Number ᮣ 22/422 Daily ᮤ Days of Operation ᮣ Daily ᮤ ᮣ As indicated ᮤ ᮣ As indicated ® y On Board Service ® y in column Days of Operation in column ReadDown Mile ᮢ Symbol ᮡ Read Up ᮤ ᮣ ® s r On Board Service ® s r 8 25A 0 Dp Oklahoma City, OK (CT) 0h Ar 9 39P Read Down Mile ᮢ Symbol ᮡ Read Up b Tulsa, Kansas City—see back 0h 1 45P Daily 0 Dp Chicago, IL–Union (CT) 8s Ar 1 52P Daily 8 49A 20 Norman, OK 8 55P Hq 9 06A 35 Purcell, OK 0h 8 38P R 2 40P Daily 37 Joliet, IL 8H D12 56P Daily 9 31A 57 Pauls Valley, OK 0h 8 12P 3 27P Daily 92 Pontiac, IL 0H 11 39A Daily 10 23A 102 Ardmore, OK 0h 7 23P 4 04P Daily 124 Bloomington-Normal, IL 8s 11 08A Daily 11 05A 141 Gainesville, TX 0h 6 42P b Davenport, Hq 12 39P 206 Ar Fort Worth, TX (CT) 8hq Dp 5 25P Indianapolis—see back 4 37P Daily 156 Lincoln, IL 0H 10 25A Daily 5 14P Daily 185 Springfield, IL &¶8s 9 55A Daily Service on the Heartland Flyer® hq ® Coaches: Reservations required.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Railroad Retirement Board
    FOM1 315 315.1 Supplemental Annuity Background 315.1.1 General In 1966 the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) began paying supplemental annuities, in addition to regular age and service annuities, to railroad employees who met certain criteria. At that time, eligibility for the supplemental annuity was limited to those employees who were age 65 or older with 25 or more years of railroad service and who were first awarded regular retirement annuities after June 30, 1966. The Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (RRA) extended supplemental annuity eligibility to those employees who were age 60 or older with 30 or more years of service and who were first awarded regular age and service annuities after June 30, 1974. The 1981 Amendments to the RRA began phasing out the supplemental annuity by adding the requirement that the employee must have at least one month of creditable railroad service before October 1, 1981 to be eligible for the supplemental annuity. Therefore, a supplemental annuity is not payable to an employee who does not have at least one month of service before October 1, 1981, even if they meet all other age and service requirements. 315.1.2 Earliest Supplemental Annuity Eligibility Dates Under 1937 and 1974 Acts A. Earliest Eligibility Dates The date an age and service annuity or disability annuity is awarded is the voucher date of the award, i.e., the date the award is processed for payment. Beginning in 1966, the employee’s age and service annuity had to be vouchered after June 1966 for them to be eligible for a supplemental annuity at age 65 with at least 25 years of service.
    [Show full text]
  • OPINION REVENUE; SATISH UPADHYAY, in His Official Capacity As Acting Director of the Oregon Department of Revenue, Defendants-Appellants
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a No. 19-35184 Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-01716-JE v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF OPINION REVENUE; SATISH UPADHYAY, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Oregon Department of Revenue, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 15, 2020 Portland, Oregon Filed July 8, 2020 Before: Jay S. Bybee and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges, and Vince Chhabria,* District Judge. * The Honorable Vince Chhabria, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. 2 BNSF RAILWAY V. OREGON DEP’T OF REVENUE Opinion by Judge VanDyke; Concurrence by Judge Chhabria SUMMARY** Rail Carriers The panel affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of BNSF Railway Co., a rail carrier that challenged the Oregon Department of Revenue’s imposition of a tax on its intangible personal property, such as accounting goodwill. Agreeing with other circuits, the panel held that BNSF could challenge the property tax under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act, known as the 4- R Act, which prohibits taxes that discriminate against rail carriers. The panel rejected the argument that tax was generally applicable and that BNSF’s challenge was no more than a demand for exemptions offered to other taxpayers. The panel held that the proper comparison class for BNSF was Oregon’s commercial and industrial taxpayers, and the intangible personal property tax assessment discriminated against BNSF in violation of the 4-R Act, 49 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • January 22, 2021 Board Meeting San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
    January 22, 2021 Board Meeting San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority ITEM 1 Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Roll Call San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority ITEM 2 Consent Calendar 2.1 Approve Minutes from November 20, 2020 Board Meeting 2.2 Appoint New Members to San Joaquin Valley Rail Committee 2.3 Next Board Meeting Location 2.4 SJJPA Operating Expense Report 2.5 Blue Ribbon Task Force Letter 2.6 Washington Update 2.7 Administrative Items San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority ITEM 3 Public Comments Please use the GoToMeeting chat function to alert staff if you wish to make a Public Comment. Alternatively, you may write in your public comment to [email protected] and staff will read the comment aloud. Public comments should be limited to approximately two minutes and no more than 240 words per comment. San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority ITEM 4 Approve a Resolution of the Board of the San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority Adopting the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final IS/MND) for the Madera Station Relocation Project (Project), Adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project, Approving the Madera Station Relocation Project, Authorizing and Directing the Executive Director to Execute and File a Notice of Determination Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the Project, and Authorizing the Executive Director to Execute Any and All Documents Related to the Project (Dan Leavitt) Madera Station Relocation Project Background . Existing Madera San Joaquins Station located in vicinity of Madera Acres . Proposed Station located just north of Avenue 12 along the existing BNSF tracks CEQA Process Schedule .
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Rail System ' 0 ° 1
    -109° 0' -108° 30' -108° 0' -107° 30' -107° 0' -106° 30' -106° 0' -105° 30' -105° 0' -104° 30' -104° 0' -103° 30' -103° 0' -102° 30' -102° 0' Colorado Statewide Rail System ' 0 ° 1 4 P U Ovid !P Sedgwick !( Julesburg %$125 Peetz !( 2012 %$127 !( I« !( Grover ?>71 F Crook !( Cowdrey !( S !( U N %$113 Proctor P B !( SEDGWICK LARIMER F 25 S Iliff ¦§¨ Interstate Highways %$125 !( LOGAN !( Walden N $318 ?>23 % JACKSON !P B ?>13 Keota Fleming /(85 !( !( !( !( U.S. Highways I« !( R !( Is Haxtun C Amherst MOFFAT !( Briggsdale Sterling !( Paoli K ?>21 ?>14 !( !( Raymer ?>14 !P !( N State Highways ' ?>14 !( !( !P Is 0 3 !P !( !P ° Maybell I¢ Craig Stoneham Holyoke County Seat 0 !( !( Gould G PHILLIPS 4 !P Hayden W %$392 UP !( !( !( WELD Is Lay !( ?>14 %$125 R ?>52 ?>71 ?>61 !( I¢ !P Merino!( Cities and Towns Rand !( !( ¹ Steamboat !( P P Springs !( U Hamilton !P U !( !( KÄ !( ROUTT U !( Elk %$317 !( !( Goodrich !( I¢ P !( Weldona ?>63 !( 13 %$131 Iy !( !( !( Hillrose Springs ?> !( Orchard !( Dinosaur Pagoda !( !( !( I¢ Oak Creek !( !( Snyder !( I¢ R ?>39 %$144 F Iy W UX !( !( BNSF F S W !( ?>59 !( G !P Grand N !( ?>64 !( !( Brush Iy B Fort Morgan GRAND Lake !( !( Wiggins Akron Yampa U !b Otis !( !( !( !P !( !( !( P Yuma I³ !( !( Eckley BN ?>64 U Hot Sulphur UP ?>52 MORGAN Iy !( SF Wray U Rangely P !( !( F !( !P ' Springs S Iy P 0 Meeker %$134 !( !( N Prospect ° !P !( !P !( !( Granby !( !( B !( ?>52 0 Toponas I¢ I§ 4 Kremmling !( !` !P !( YUMA RIO BLANCO B !( !P ?>71 I¢ P KÄ Fraser !( N !( ?>63 !( S U F !( P !( F!( $139 U !( % !P WASHINGTON S P
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-Of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016
    Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 Accident Report NTSB/RAR-17/02 National PB2018-100263 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/RAR-17/02 PB2018-100263 Notation 57150 Adopted November 14, 2017 Railroad Accident Report Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2017. Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment, Chester, Pennsylvania, April 3, 2016. NTSB/RAR-17/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: On April 3, 2016, about 7:50 a.m. eastern daylight time, southbound Amtrak train 89 (train 89) struck a backhoe with a worker inside at milepost 15.7 near Chester, Pennsylvania. The train was authorized to operate on main track 3 (track 3) at the maximum authorized speed of 110 mph. Beginning on the morning of April 1, Amtrak had scheduled track-bed restoration―ballast vacuuming—at milepost 15.7 on track 2 on the Philadelphia to Washington Line. Track 2 had to be taken out of service between control points Baldwin (milepost 11.7) and Hook (milepost 16.8) for the 55 hour duration of the project. As train 89 approached milepost 15.7, the locomotive engineer saw equipment and workers on and near track 3 and initiated an emergency brake application. The train speed was 106 mph before the emergency brake application and 99 mph when it struck the backhoe. Two roadway workers were killed, and 39 other people were injured. Amtrak estimated property damages to be $2.5 million.
    [Show full text]