DOCSLIB.ORG

Oklahoma Department of Transportation Rail Publication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oklahoma Department of Transportation Rail Publication 2018 UPDATE RAIL Page Table of Contents Rail Programs Division - ODOT............................................................... Page 3 Rail Moves Through Oklahoma................................................................ Page 7 Passenger Rail Transportation.................................................................. Page 9 History and Current Status of Oklahoma Rail Line Acquisitions......... Page 11 Railroad State Map................................................................................... Page 17 Preface Rail Involvement he Oklahoma Department of Transportation serves In August 2014, ODOT and the Stillwater Central Railroad T in a number of roles related to railroads and railroad completed a $75 million sale of the Sooner Sub rail line related activities. ODOT currently manages leases with between Midwest City and Sapulpa. The sale of this 97.5 mile three different railroad companies operating on state-owned line was the culmination of a 180 day process put into place in track, administers the Federal Highway Administration’s 2013 by the State Legislature. Commitments included in the Grade Crossing Safety Program which provides funding for sale call for the introduction of a pilot program for passenger- safety improvements to Oklahoma’s nearly 3800 at-grade rail service, dubbed the “Eastern Flyer” connecting Midwest public rail/roadway intersections, manages Oklahoma’s City and Sapulpa to be implemented by August 2019. Heartland Flyer passenger rail service which is one of Amtrak’s highest-rated trains for customer satisfaction, With the sale of the Sooner Sub rail line, ODOT announced serves as a liaison between ODOT and rail companies a $100 million initiative to accelerate safety projects at for ODOT projects which involve operations or railroad railroad crossings statewide. State budget reductions in property and reviews federal funding opportunities to grow 2016 have subsequently limited the program to $75 million. and improve Oklahoma’s passenger and freight rail systems. Since kicking off the safety initiative in October of 2015, the Transportation Commission has approved more than 231 Over the years, the Department has developed public-private crossing improvement projects statewide, which will add partnerships with many Class III and Class I railroads to flashing light signals and crossing gate arms to many of these lease the majority of what was once an 882 mile system of crossings. Federal funding, as well as funds provided by state-owned track, in order to continue rail freight service railroad companies and the local entities are also being used for many Oklahoma communities and businesses. Two of in the initiative, which has enabled ODOT to advance nearly the leases were developed as long term lease-to-purchase ten years of improvements in little more than two years. agreements, intended to eventually return those facilities to private ownership. Following the maturation of these 30 Freight traffic continues to be the main source of railroad year agreements, more than 350 miles of the state-owned activity in the state. An estimated 338 million tons of freight rail system was returned to private ownership in 2013, thus is transported by rail in the state each year, with many rail reducing ODOT’s rail ownership to just over 200 miles. lines carrying 50 to 100 trains a day. Rail freight traffic will experience significant growth over the next few decades with the number of trains on some corridors expected to double over the next 20 years. The largest growth in freight traffic per day is expected on the BNSF Railway in the northern part of the state. Page 2 Rail Programs Division of the Oklahoma Department of Transportation stablished in 1989, Rail Programs Division oversees the Estate’s interests in the 3,244 miles of rail that run across Oklahoma. The Division is responsible for administering federal and state funds used to support operation of the Heartland Flyer passenger service, highway construction projects affecting railroad property, railroad crossing safety improvements, and maintenance of the state-owned rail lines. The Division is comprised of five branches - Safety; State-owned Rail Line Management; Construction; Federal Programs; and Passenger Rail. Page 3 338 MILLION TONS of freight is transported by rail in the state each year. Many rail lines carrying 50 to100 TRAINS EACH DAY Page 4 ODOT Rail Safety Program The State-owned Rail Construction The Rail Programs Division Safety Branch works with all and Maintenance Work Plan railroads active in Oklahoma and the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, as well as the counties and communities in The State-owned Rail Construction and Maintenance which the railroads operate, to actively pursue initiatives Work Plan is funded through the Railroad Maintenance leading to safer travel for Oklahoma’s citizens. The ODOT Revolving Fund established through the passage of the Rail Safety Program is comprised of three primary areas of Railroad Rehabilitation Act of 1978. Funding comes from focus - single high priority rail crossing locations, statewide both the Oklahoma Freight Car Tax and from the lease- minimum rail safety standard projects and rail corridor safety purchase agreements with state-owned rail operators. improvements. These programs aim to either improve on- Annual contributions to the fund historically have been the-ground safety conditions or close and eliminate highly approximately $1.8 million per year, but due to recent state- active railroad crossings that rise to the top of the annual owned rail line lease maturities and sales, this figure has ranking and inspection reports. Through a combination of dropped significantly. Funded projects are, and will continue annual OK.RAIL crossing database reporting results and to be, identified from applications submitted through the field-based diagnostic team inspections, the ODOT Rail Railroad Rehabilitation Act Loan Program, discussions with Programs Safety Branch identifies the crossings deemed state rail lessees, as well as the State Rail Plan. Projects are most in need of attention. prioritized based on safety considerations and infrastructure deficiencies. The following are considered: • Anticipated % reduction in truck traffic • National freight transportation trends • Annual tonnage transported • Condition of rail structures • Rail highway safety • Track condition Page 5 Rail Programs Division Federal Programs Branch ODOT has employed an objective investment program The Federal Programs Branch identifies and secures federal intended to maximize the benefit from its scarce resources. funding available for rail improvements such as TIGER, The State-owned Rail Construction and Maintenance BUILD and INFRA grants. Its purpose is to ensure that Work Plan continues to focus on the solid investment of ODOT is fully compliant and integrated with all rail funding funds vital to maintaining rail operations and the overall initiatives such as the State Rail Plan and State Freight Plan transportation network, including efforts associated with requirements. The Branch also keeps ODOT staff informed delivering the ODOT 8 Year Construction Work Plan. of national rail policy and priorities by participating in the ODOT updates this plan annually for formal submission AASHTO Standing Committee on Rail and the States for to the Oklahoma Transportation Commission for approval. Passenger Rail Coalition. Oklahoma Rail Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grant Awards Great Plains Freight Rail Sayre to Clinton Eric to Sayre Enid to Elk City TIGER II TIGER III TIGER V TIGER IX (co-op with KDOT-ODOT) TOTAL PROJECT COST: TOTAL PROJECT COST: TOTAL PROJECT COST: TOTAL PROJECT COST: $22,500,147.00 $8,456,580.00 $2,621,700.00 $16,502,989 This project improved This project greatly This project has greatly This project will capacity on the South increased freight rail increased freight rail upgrade the Enid to Elk Kansas and Oklahoma capacity for Farmrail capacity between Texas City line to be 286,000 Railroad Company Corporation (FMRC) in and western Oklahoma. lbs. compliant. (SK&O) rail line to the western Oklahoma. Port of Catoosa. Page 6 Rail Freight Moves Through Oklahoma ail freight traffic volumes are the heaviest in the Rcorridor on the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) line in the northwestern part of the state and on the north-south BNSF route in the central part of the state, both carrying between 50 and 100 trains per day. The next highest train traffic volumes are shown on the Union Pacific Railroad (UP) lines, one parallel to US-81 north to south through the central part of the state and another in the eastern part of the state roughly paralleling the US-69 corridor. Rail freight traffic is projected to grow significantly over the next few decades. The number of trains on some corridors is expected to double over the next 25 years and the largest growth in freight traffic per day is expected on the BNSF line in the northern part of the state. Rail flows to, from, and within northeastern Oklahoma are expected to see strong growth as well, boosted by gains in exports from the Tulsa area to Arkansas and Missouri. Rail (annual tons) In addition to the BNSF and the UP, the Kansas City Southern Railway Company is the third Class I railroad operating in Oklahoma. Additionally, Oklahoma has 18 < 3 Million Class III carriers. 3-4.99 Million 5-14.99 Million 15-49.99 Million 50-89.99 Million >90 Million Page 7 Page 8 Passenger Rail Transportation in Oklahoma he
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Texas Eagle® Heartland Flyer®
    2009 ® 26, TEXAS EAGLE OCTOBER And HEARTLAND FLYER® Effective SM journey. the Enjoy TEXAS EAGLE® serving CHICAGO - ST. LOUIS - LITTLE ROCK DALLAS - FORT WORTH - SAN ANTONIO 1-800-USA-RAIL LOS ANGELES Call And intermediate stations HEARTLAND FLYER® serving OKLAHOMA CITY - FORT WORTH And intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form P21–200M–10/26/09 Stock #02-3670 TEXAS EAGLE HEARTLAND FLYER Chicago • St. Louis • Little Rock • Dallas • Oklahoma City • Fort Worth Fort Worth • San Antonio • Los Angeles 821 ᮤ Train Number ᮣ 822 21/421 ᮤ Train Number ᮣ 22/422 Daily ᮤ Days of Operation ᮣ Daily ᮤ ᮣ As indicated ᮤ ᮣ As indicated ® y On Board Service ® y in column Days of Operation in column ReadDown Mile ᮢ Symbol ᮡ Read Up ᮤ ᮣ ® s r On Board Service ® s r 8 25A 0 Dp Oklahoma City, OK (CT) 0h Ar 9 39P Read Down Mile ᮢ Symbol ᮡ Read Up b Tulsa, Kansas City—see back 0h 1 45P Daily 0 Dp Chicago, IL–Union (CT) 8s Ar 1 52P Daily 8 49A 20 Norman, OK 8 55P Hq 9 06A 35 Purcell, OK 0h 8 38P R 2 40P Daily 37 Joliet, IL 8H D12 56P Daily 9 31A 57 Pauls Valley, OK 0h 8 12P 3 27P Daily 92 Pontiac, IL 0H 11 39A Daily 10 23A 102 Ardmore, OK 0h 7 23P 4 04P Daily 124 Bloomington-Normal, IL 8s 11 08A Daily 11 05A 141 Gainesville, TX 0h 6 42P b Davenport, Hq 12 39P 206 Ar Fort Worth, TX (CT) 8hq Dp 5 25P Indianapolis—see back 4 37P Daily 156 Lincoln, IL 0H 10 25A Daily 5 14P Daily 185 Springfield, IL &¶8s 9 55A Daily Service on the Heartland Flyer® hq ® Coaches: Reservations required.
    [Show full text]
  • January 22, 2021 Board Meeting San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
    January 22, 2021 Board Meeting San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority ITEM 1 Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Roll Call San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority ITEM 2 Consent Calendar 2.1 Approve Minutes from November 20, 2020 Board Meeting 2.2 Appoint New Members to San Joaquin Valley Rail Committee 2.3 Next Board Meeting Location 2.4 SJJPA Operating Expense Report 2.5 Blue Ribbon Task Force Letter 2.6 Washington Update 2.7 Administrative Items San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority ITEM 3 Public Comments Please use the GoToMeeting chat function to alert staff if you wish to make a Public Comment. Alternatively, you may write in your public comment to [email protected] and staff will read the comment aloud. Public comments should be limited to approximately two minutes and no more than 240 words per comment. San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority ITEM 4 Approve a Resolution of the Board of the San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority Adopting the Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final IS/MND) for the Madera Station Relocation Project (Project), Adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project, Approving the Madera Station Relocation Project, Authorizing and Directing the Executive Director to Execute and File a Notice of Determination Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the Project, and Authorizing the Executive Director to Execute Any and All Documents Related to the Project (Dan Leavitt) Madera Station Relocation Project Background . Existing Madera San Joaquins Station located in vicinity of Madera Acres . Proposed Station located just north of Avenue 12 along the existing BNSF tracks CEQA Process Schedule .
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Administrator's Letterhead Stationery
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2014 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2014) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published September 2014 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Page Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) 1 – 2 Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue 3 – 4 Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) 5 – 6 Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile 7 – 8 Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile 9 On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed 10 Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP 10 Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP 10 Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles 11 – 12 Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles 13 Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles 14 Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (CSI) Scores 15 Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems 16 Table 12: Complaints Received 17 Table 13: Food-related Complaints 18 Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints 19 Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints 20 Table 16: Station-related Complaints 21 Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure 22 Availability of Other Modes 22 Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions 23 Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions 24 Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions 25 Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Oklahoma
    Amtrak Fact Sheet, Fiscal Year 2011 State of Oklahoma Amtrak-Oklahoma partnership z Grants from the State of Oklahoma help support the daily Heartland Flyer service between Oklahoma City and Fort Worth Amtrak Service & Ridership Amtrak serves Oklahoma with one corridor train, the Heartland Flyer (daily Oklahoma City-Fort Worth, Texas). The Heartland Flyer provides connections to the Amtrak national train network at Fort Worth. During FY11 Amtrak served the following Oklahoma locations: City Boardings + Alightings Ardmore 9,941 Norman 14,364 Oklahoma City 56,368 Pauls Valley 6,067 Purcell 2,152 Total Oklahoma Station Usage: 88,892 (up 2.5% from FY10) Procurement/Contracts Amtrak placed orders valued at $953,310 for goods and services in Oklahoma in FY11, most of it in Oklahoma City. Employment At the end of FY11, Amtrak employed 3 Oklahoma residents. Total wages of Amtrak employees living in Oklahoma were $181,070 during FY11. State-Assisted Services The Heartland Flyer has been funded by the State of Oklahoma since the train began service in 1999. Oklahoma has made capital upgrades to the BNSF Railway tracks in Oklahoma, allowing for speed increases to 79 mph over segments of the route and reducing the trip time for the Heartland Flyer. FY11 Amtrak Government Affairs: December 2011 ridership on Heartland Flyer trains was 2.8% above FY10. The State of Texas also began a contract partnership with Amtrak in FY07 to support the operation of the train. Green Energy Amtrak and the Oklahoma and Texas DOTs conducted the nation’s first-ever test of a cleaner and renewable biodiesel fuel blend to power the Heartland Flyer, with the aim of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the use of foreign oil.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Eagle-Heartland Flyer-Chicago-Los Angeles-Oklahoma City-Fort Worth-May072012
    TEXAS EAGLE® MAY 7, 2012 and HEARTLAND FLYER® Effective SM Enjoy the journey. TEXAS EAGLE® serving CHICAGO - ST. LOUIS - LITTLE ROCK DALLAS - FORT WORTH - SAN ANTONIO 1-800-USA-RAIL LOS ANGELES And intermediate stations Call HEARTLAND FLYER® serving OKLAHOMA CITY - FORT WORTH and intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form P21–175M–5/7/12 Stock #02-3675 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. TEXAS EAGLE Service on the Texas Eagle® 21/421 Train Number 22/422 R Coaches: Reservations required. As indicated As indicated in column Normal Days of Operation in column s Sleeping cars: Superliner sleeping accommodations. R s R s - Amtrak Metropolitan Lounge available in Chicago, and On Board Service a private waiting area available in St. Louis for r y l r y l Sleeping car passengers. Read Down Mile Symbol Read Up - Sleeping car passengers arriving at Los Angeles are l1 45P Daily 0 Dp Chicago, IL–Union Station (CT) ∑w- Ar l1 52P Daily welcome to occupy their accommodations until 6:30 b Madison—see back a.m. R2 40P Daily 37 Joliet, IL ∑v D12 56P Daily r Dining-Cross Country Café: Casual service offering 3 27P Daily 92 Pontiac, IL >v 11 39A Daily complete meals. y l4 04P Daily 124 Bloomington-Normal, IL ∑v- l11 08A Daily Sightseer Lounge: Sandwiches, snacks and b Davenport, Indianapolis beverages. —see back l Checked baggage at select stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Eagle-Chicago-Los Angeles-October122020
    TEXAS EAGLE® Effective October 12, 2020 serving CHICAGO - ST. LOUIS - LITTLE ROCK - DALLAS - FORT WORTH - SAN ANTONIO - LOS ANGELES and intermediate stations Amtrak.com BOOK TRAVEL, CHECK TRAIN STATUS, ACCESS YOUR ETICKET AND MORE THROUGH THE Amtrak app. 1-800-USA-RAIL Service on the Texas Eagle® 21/421 3Train Number4 22/422 R Coaches: Reservations required. As indicated As indicated in column 3Normal Days of Operation4 in column s Private rooms. For more information, visit R s r R s r Amtrak.com/rooms. 3On Board Service4 r Dining service: For more information, visit y l O y l O Amtrak.com/dining. Read Down Mile 6 Symbol 5 Read Up y Café service: For more information, visit l1 45P TuFrSu 0 Dp Chicago, IL–Union Station (CT) ∑w- Ar l1 52P WeSaMo Amtrak.com/cafe. b Janesville—see page 2 l Checked baggage at select stations. lR2 40P TuFrSu 37 Joliet, IL ∑v p lD12 56P WeSaMo O Bicycles on Amtrak: We offer a number of different 3 27P TuFrSu 92 Pontiac, IL >v 11 39A WeSaMo services to transport your bike on many routes. Each l4 04P TuFrSu 124 Bloomington-Normal, IL ∑w- l11 08A WeSaMo train has different equipment and loading procedures b Indianapolis—see page 2 that dictate what service will be offered. Reservations 4 37P TuFrSu 156 Lincoln, IL >v 10 25A WeSaMo are required and additional charges may apply. Visit 1l5 14P TuFrSu 185 Springfield, IL ∑w 1l9 55A WeSaMo Amtrak.com/bikes for all the details before you book 5 49P TuFrSu 224 Carlinville, IL >w 9 15A WeSaMo your trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    People Before Freight On-time trains on host railroads 3 LATEST REPORT CARD SIGNALS NEW GOLDEN AGE OF ON-TIME TRAINS 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF A 3 Union Pacific A 4 CSX A 5 Canadian National A 6 Norfolk Southern A Average grade for all host railroads: A 4 Amtrak National Network Passengers Continue to Experience Poor On-Time Performance 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C 5 Grading National Network routes on OTP 17 of 28 State-Supported Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time State‐Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on‐time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% Capitol Corridor UP 89% New York ‐ Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% PASS Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% FAIL New York ‐ Niagara Falls CSX 70% Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple Leaf CSX 64% Wolverine NS, CN 60% Heartland Flyer BNSF 58% Carolinian CSX, NS 51% Illini / Saluki CN 37% 6 Grading National Network routes on OTP 14 of 15 Long Distance Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time Long
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1
    Amtrak Station Program and Planning Guidelines 1. Overview 5 6. Site 55 1.1 Background 5 6.1 Introduction 55 1.2 Introduction 5 6.2 Multi-modal Planning 56 1.3 Contents of the Guidelines 6 6.3 Context 57 1.4 Philosophy, Goals and Objectives 7 6.4 Station/Platform Confi gurations 61 1.5 Governing Principles 8 6.5 Track and Platform Planning 65 6.6 Vehicular Circulation 66 6.7 Bicycle Parking 66 2. Process 11 6.8 Parking 67 2.1 Introduction 11 6.9 Amtrak Functional Requirements 68 2.2 Stakeholder Coordination 12 6.10 Information Systems and Way Finding 69 2.3 Concept Development 13 6.11 Safety and Security 70 2.4 Funding 14 6.12 Sustainable Design 71 2.5 Real Estate Transactional Documents 14 6.13 Universal Design 72 2.6 Basis of Design 15 2.7 Construction Documents 16 2.8 Project Delivery methods 17 7. Station 73 2.9 Commissioning 18 7.1 Introduction 73 2.10 Station Opening 18 7.2 Architectural Overview 74 7.3 Information Systems and Way Finding 75 7.4 Passenger Information Display System (PIDS) 77 3. Amtrak System 19 7.5 Safety and Security 78 3.1 Introduction 19 7.6 Sustainable Design 79 3.2 Service Types 20 7.7 Accessibility 80 3.3 Equipment 23 3.4 Operations 26 8. Platform 81 8.1 Introduction 81 4. Station Categories 27 8.2 Platform Types 83 4.1 Introduction 27 8.3 Platform-Track Relationships 84 4.2 Summary of Characteristics 28 8.4 Connection to the station 85 4.3 Location and Geography 29 8.5 Platform Length 87 4.4 Category 1 Large stations 30 8.6 Platform Width 88 4.5 Category 2 Medium Stations 31 8.7 Platform Height 89 4.6 Category 3 Caretaker Stations 32 8.8 Additional Dimensions and Clearances 90 4.7 Category 4 Shelter Stations 33 8.9 Safety and Security 91 4.8 Thruway Bus Service 34 8.10 Accessibility 92 8.11 Snow Melting Systems 93 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Groendyke Transport: an Industry Leader Becky Hodgen, Communications and Brand Manager, Enid
    MOVING OKLAHOMA IMPROVING OUR TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE THE 2013 OKLAHOMA ACADEMY TOWN HALL about the infrastructure required to move people, products and information © 2013 The Oklahoma Academy Town Hall 1 Moving Oklahoma: Transportation Infrastructure The Oklahoma Academy The Oklahoma Academy is a statewide nonprofit, nonpartisan, membership organization founded by Governor Henry Bellmon in 1967, and revitalized by him in 1985, to bring public attention to policy issues, provide objective, thorough research and act as a catalyst for positive change. The Mission of the Oklahoma Academy is to identify issues facing Oklahoma, provide well-researched, objective information, foster nonpartisan collaboration, develop responsible recommendations, and encourage community and legislative action. The Vision of the Oklahoma Academy is to empower Oklahomans to improve their quality of life through effective public policy development and implementation. The Academy Process identifies areas of need and problems facing Oklahoma, conducts research on identified critical issues, and develops long range goals, consensus recommendations, and agendas for action. Through the Town Hall conference process, forums and summits, the Academy increases citizen awareness, encourages civic engagement and sets the stage for thoughtfully improving Oklahoma. Moving Ideas Into Action The Oklahoma Academy 120 E. Sheridan, Suite 200 Oklahoma City, OK 73104-2427 405.307.0986 (phone) 405.307.0947 (fax) Email: [email protected] Moving Oklahoma: Transportation Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Payne County, OK
    Payne County, OK. Long Range Transportation Plan 2018-2040 CENTRAL OKLAHOMA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION CORTPO 400 N. BELL, SHAWNEE OK 74802 PHONE - 405-273-6410 EXT 146 FAX – 405-273-3213 EMAIL- [email protected] WWW.COEDD.NET Publication of this document was financed in part by funds provided by the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The provision of Federal financial assistance should not be construed as denoting U.S. Government approval of plans, policies, programs or projects contained herein. The Central Oklahoma Regional Transportation Planning Organization (CORTPO) complies with all civil rights provisions of federal statues and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Therefore, the CORTPO does not discriminate based on race, sex, color, or national origin, religion or disability, in the admission, access to and treatment in CORTPO programs and activities, as well as the CORTPO hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the CORTPO RTPO’s nondiscrimination policies may be directed to the RPO Planner, Title VI & Title II Coordinator, 400 North Bell, Shawnee OK 74801, 405-273-6410 or the following email: [email protected] pg. 1 Payne County Oklahoma Long Range Transportation Plan 2018-2040 CORTPO In cooperation with: County of Payne County Oklahoma Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Central Oklahoma Economic Development District (COEDD) Bike of Oklahoma Stillwater Bicyclist & Pedestrian Ad Hoc Committee Town of Glencoe City of Yale City of Stillwater City of Perkins City of Cushing Pawnee Nation Iowa Nation Francis Renewable Energy LLC Payne County Regional Transit Authority Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust Oklahoma State Preventative Program pg.
    [Show full text]