DOCSLIB.ORG

Kootenai River Tributaries Water Quality Summary 1998 / 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kootenai River Tributaries Water Quality Summary 1998 / 2000 Kootenai River Tributaries Water Quality Summary 1998 / 2000 Boundary Cr. Discharge (cfs) USGS # 12321500 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 /1/ /1/ /1/ /1/ /1/ /1/ /1/ /1/ /1/ /1/ 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 Prepared by: Pocket Water Inc. Boise, Idaho November , 2000 Submitted to: Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Bonners Ferry, Idaho Kootenai River Tributaries Water Quality Summary 1998 / 2000 Prepared by: Stephen B. Bauer Pocket Water Inc. 8560 Atwater Drive Boise, Idaho 83714 [email protected] http:/www.pocketwater.com 2000 Submitted to: Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Fish and Wildlife Department P.O. Box 1269 Bonners Ferry, Idaho 83805 Abstract The tributaries to the Kootenai River support resident and adfluvial fish populations and influence the unique fisheries (sturgeon and burbot) in the Kootenai River. Water quality samples were collected in the tributaries to the Kootenai River by the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho to determine the potential for heavy metal contamination and the nutrient inputs from these watersheds to the Kootenai River. The concentration of arsenic, cadmium, copper, mercury, selenium, and zinc in the tributaries was generally measured below detection limits; only 1-3% of the samples exceeded detection limits. The results for these elements (arsenic, cadmium, copper, mercury, selenium, and zinc) do not indicate a potential concern with toxicity given the constraints of the field and laboratory methods used. Two metals, aluminum and lead, occurred at concentrations which exceed laboratory detection limits; 34 percent of total aluminum samples and 24 percent of lead samples occurred above recommended U.S. EPA chronic toxicity criteria for protection of aquatic life. Since the data was collected as unfiltered samples and reported as total metals, the bioavailability of these metals cannot be determined without further study. The probability is that the aluminum is tied up in the particulate fraction, and is not bioavailable since the higher concentrations occur during spring runoff when sediments are being generated from the watersheds. The lead concentrations measured above detection limits appear to be an artifact of the analytical methods used rather than a signal of potential toxicity. Collecting filtered samples and using a laboratory that specializes in trace metal analysis can resolve these questions. Nutrients occur at low levels in the Kootenai River tributaries consistent with the nutrient concentrations observed in the Kootenai River. Dissolved phosphorus concentrations were, for the most part, below detection limits of 0.01 - 0.026 mg/L. Nitrates were measured above the detection limit (0.005 mg/L) 75 % of the time, but still occur at low concentrations (overall median of 0.022 mg/L) characteristic of oligotrophic systems. i Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Report Objectives...............................................................................................................1 1.2 Background........................................................................................................................1 1.3 Drainage Description...........................................................................................................2 1.4 Basin Geology and Geomorphology ....................................................................................2 1.5 Soils ...................................................................................................................................4 1.6 Climate and Hydrology .......................................................................................................5 1.7 Fisheries Resources ............................................................................................................6 2.0 Summary of Applicable Reports.............................................................................................7 3.0 Methods................................................................................................................................9 4.0 Station Locations ...................................................................................................................9 4.1 Field and Laboratory Methods..........................................................................................10 4.2 Data Interpretation Issues..................................................................................................13 4.2.1 Dissolved vs. Total Metals..........................................................................................14 4.2.2 Method Detection Limits............................................................................................14 4.2.3 Application of Water Quality Criteria to Data Interpretation........................................14 4.3 Hardness Values used to calculate criteria..........................................................................15 5.0 Results.................................................................................................................................18 5.1 Aluminum .........................................................................................................................18 5.2 Arsenic.............................................................................................................................20 5.3 Cadmium..........................................................................................................................21 5.4 Copper.............................................................................................................................21 5.5 Lead.................................................................................................................................22 5.6 Mercury...........................................................................................................................23 5.7 Selenium...........................................................................................................................24 5.8 Zinc..................................................................................................................................24 5.9 Nutrient Data....................................................................................................................24 5.9.1 Treatment of Less-Than Values..................................................................................25 5.10 Dissolved Phosphorus ...................................................................................................25 5.11 Nitrates.........................................................................................................................25 6.0 Summary and Conclusions....................................................................................................30 6.1 Metals ..............................................................................................................................30 6.2 Nutrients...........................................................................................................................31 7.0 Recommendations................................................................................................................31 Literature Cited..............................................................................................................................33 ii Figures and Tables Figure 1. The Kootenai River watershed..........................................................................................2 Figure 2: Daily mean discharge at Boundary Creek, water year 1990-1999......................................5 Figure 3: Daily mean discharge at Boundary Creek, water year 1998-1999......................................6 Figure 4: Kootenai River tributary stations (downstream segment). .................................................11 Figure 5: Kootenai River tributary stations (upstream segment).......................................................12 Figure 6: Hardness values for Kootenai River tributaries.................................................................15 Figure 7: Seasonal distribution of aluminum in a representative tributary...........................................20 Figure 8: Dissolved Phosphorus: Comparison of Tributaries to River..............................................27 Figure 9: Nitrate distribution in Kootenai River tributaries...............................................................28 Figure 10: Nitrates: Comparison of Tributaries to Kootenai River stations......................................29 Table 1: Water quality and fisheries studies in the Kootenai River basin.............................................7 Table 2. KTOI sampling stations on the Kootenai River Tributaries..................................................9 Table 3. Laboratory analytical methods and reporting limits............................................................13 Table 4. Water quality criteria applicable to the Kootenai River......................................................17 Table 5: Aluminum summary statistics. ...........................................................................................19 Table 6: Arsenic summary statistics................................................................................................21 Table 7: Lead summary statistics....................................................................................................23 Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013
    L O CA L GOVERNMEN TS’ COMMI TTEE Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013 The BC Columbia River Treaty Local Governments’ Committee (the Committee) has prepared these Recommendations in response to the Columbia River Treaty-related interests and issues raised by Columbia River Basin residents in Canada. These Recommendations are based on currently-available information. They have been submitted to the provincial and federal governments for incorporation into current decisions regarding the future of the Columbia River Treaty (CRT). The Committee plans to monitor the BC, Canadian and U.S. CRT-related processes and be directly involved when appropriate. As new information becomes available, the Committee will review this information, seek input from Basin residents, and submit further recommendations to the provincial and federal governments, if needed. The CRT Local Governments’ Committee will post its recommendations and other documents at www.akblg.ca/content/columbia-river-treaty. For more information contact the Committee Chair, Deb Kozak ([email protected] 250 352-9383) or the Executive Director, Cindy Pearce ([email protected] 250 837-3966). Background Beginning in 2024, either the U.S. or Canada can The Columbia River Treaty (Treaty) was ratified terminate substantial portions of the Treaty, by Canada and the United States (the U.S.) in with at least 10 years’ prior notice. Canada—via 1964, resulting in the construction of three the BC Provincial Government—and the U.S. are dams in Canada—Mica Dam north of both conducting reviews to consider whether to Revelstoke; Hugh Keenleyside Dam near continue, amend or terminate the Treaty. Castlegar; and Duncan Dam north of Kaslo—and Local governments within the Basin have Libby Dam near Libby, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Kootenai River Resident Fish Mitigation: White Sturgeon, Burbot, Native Salmonid Monitoring and Evaluation
    KOOTENAI RIVER RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION: WHITE STURGEON, BURBOT, NATIVE SALMONID MONITORING AND EVALUATION Annual Progress Report May 1, 2016 — April 31, 2017 BPA Project # 1988-065-00 Report covers work performed under BPA contract # 68393 IDFG Report Number 08-09 April 2018 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. This report should be cited as follows: Ross et al. 2018. Report for 05/01/2016 – 04/30/2017. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1: KOOTENAI STURGEON MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................... 1 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................3 STUDY SITE ...............................................................................................................................3 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................3 Water
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1983 Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians Cynthia J. Manning The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Manning, Cynthia J., "Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians" (1983). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5855. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5855 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished m a n u s c r ip t in w h ic h c o p y r ig h t su b ­ s i s t s . Any further r e p r in t in g of it s c o n ten ts must be a ppro ved BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD L ib r a r y Un iv e r s it y of Montana D a te : 1 9 8 3 AN ETHNOHISTORY OF THE KOOTENAI INDIANS By Cynthia J. Manning B.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1978 Presented in partial fu lfillm en t of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1983 Approved by: Chair, Board of Examiners Fan, Graduate Sch __________^ ^ c Z 3 ^ ^ 3 Date UMI Number: EP36656 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • White Paper on COLUMBIA RIVER POST-2024 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE
    White Paper on COLUMBIA RIVER POST-2024 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division September 2011 This page intentionally left blank PREFACE The Columbia River, the fourth largest river on the continent as measured by average annual flow, provides more hydropower than any other river in North America. While its headwaters originate in British Columbia, only about 15 percent of the 259,500 square miles of the river’s basin is located in Canada. Yet the Canadian water accounts for about 38 percent of the average annual flow volume, and up to 50 percent of the peak flood waters, that flow on the lower Columbia River between Oregon and Washington. In the 1940s, officials from the United States and Canada began a long process to seek a collaborative solution to reduce the risks of flooding caused by the Columbia River and to meet the postwar demand for energy. That effort resulted in the implementation of the Columbia River Treaty in 1964. This agreement between Canada and the United States called for the cooperative development of water resource regulation in the upper Columbia River Basin. The Columbia River Treaty has provided significant flood control (also termed flood risk management) and hydropower generation benefiting both countries. The Treaty, and subsequent Protocol, include provisions that both expire on September 16, 2024, 60 years after the Treaty’s ratification, and continue throughout the life of the associated facilities whether the Treaty continues or is terminated by either country. This white paper focuses on the flood risk management changes that will occur on that milestone date and satisfies the following purposes: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Lake Quick Fact Sheet
    COLUMBIA LAKE QUICK REFERENCE SHEET JUST A FEW AMAZING THINGS ABOUT OUR AMAZING LAKE! . Maximum length – 13.5 km (8.4 mi) . Maximum width – 2 km (1.2 mi) . Typical depth – 15 ft . Average July water temperature – 18 C – making it the largest warm water lake in East Kootenay . Surface Elevation – 808m (2,650 ft) .Area – 6,815 acres (2,758 hectares) . Freezing – last year, it was observed the lake froze on December 7, 2016 and thawed on March 29, 2017. Columbia Lake is fed by several small tributaries. East side tributaries include Warspite and Lansdown Creeks. West Side tributiaries include Dutch, Hardie, Marion and Sun Creeks. Columbia Lake also gets a considerable amount of water at the south end where water from the Kootenay river enters the lake as groundwater. The water balance of Columbia Lake is still not fully understood. The Columbia Lake Stewardship Society continues to do research in this area. Columbia Lake got its name from the Columbia River. The river was so named by American sea captain Robert Gray who navigated his privately owned ship The Columbia Rediviva through its waters in May 1792 trading fur pelts. Columbia Lake is the source of the mighty Columbia River, the largest river in the Pacific Northwest of North America. The Columbia River flows north from the lake while the neighbouring Kootenay flows south. For approximately 100 km (60 mi) the Columbia River and the Kootenay River run parallel and when they reach Canal Flats, the two rivers are less than 2 km (1.2 mi) apart. Historically the Baillie- Grohman Canal connected the two bodies of water to facilitate the navigation of steamboats (although only three trips were ever made through it).
    [Show full text]
  • REGION 4 - Kootenay the Management Unit Boundaries Indicated on the Map Below Are Shown Only As a Reference to Help Anglers Locate Waters in the Region
    REGION 4 - Kootenay The Management Unit boundaries indicated on the map below are shown only as a reference to help anglers locate waters in the region. For more precise Fish and Wildlife Regional Offices Management Unit boundaries, please consult one of the commercial Recreational Atlases available for B.C. (250) 489-8540 205 Industrial Rd G Cranbrook BC V1C 7G5 (250) 354-6333 R.A.P.P. 401-333 Victoria St Report All Poachers and Polluters Nelson BC V1L 4K3 Conservation Officer 24 Hour Hotline 1-877-952-RAPP (7277) Conservation Officer Service Cellular Dial #7277 Field Offices Please refer to page 94 Please call 1-877-952-7277 for recorded Canoe Reach 7-2 for more information information or to make an appointment KINBASKET www.rapp.bc.ca at any of the following Field Offices: 3-44 LAKE R d o Castlegar, Cranbrook, Creston, Fernie, o 3-43 W Golden, Invermere, and Nelson Mica 4-40 Creek B u Columbi s h S cr igmouth Cr ip B R 3-40 a Cr 3-42 Reac Gol d R 3-41 st am re R old R 4-36 G LAKE h S y e Donald rr y 4-38 ebe m 4-37 Station la o REVELSTOKE B NATIONAL PARKS u r YOHO Provincial angling regulations and REGION GLACIER T a R n NATIONAL licensing do not apply in the National g i e r NATIONAL R Parks in this region (see page 10). Golden Kic PARK R 4-39 ki n 3-36 g MT. y R Please contact Parks Canada for fishing r PARK H r REVELSTOKE t o e ae rs P ew e SHUSWAP NATIONAL ill CO information at 1-888-773-8888.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Characteristics and Transport in the Kootenai River White Sturgeon Critical Habitat Near Bonners Ferry, Idaho
    Prepared in cooperation with the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Sediment Characteristics and Transport in the Kootenai River White Sturgeon Critical Habitat near Bonners Ferry, Idaho Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5228 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Kootenai River below Moyie River at river kilometer 257.41 looking upstream towards the left bank. (Photograph taken by Robert J. Kasun, Wildland Hydrology, May 2008) Sediment Characteristics and Transport in the Kootenai River White Sturgeon Critical Habitat near Bonners Ferry, Idaho By Ryan L. Fosness and Marshall L. Williams Prepared in cooperation with the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5228 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2009 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Fosness, R.L., and Williams, M.L., 2009, Sediment characteristics and transport in the Kootenai River white sturgeon critical habitat near Bonners Ferry, Idaho: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch1 Overview
    RESERVATION OF RIGHTS A number of governments and agencies participated in the development of this Kootenai Subbasin Plan, Part I (Assessment Volume), Part II (Inventory Volume), and Part III (Management Plan Volume), its appendices, and electronically linked references and information (hereafter Plan). The primary purpose of the Plan is to help direct Northwest Power and Conservation Council funding of projects that respond to impacts from the development and operation of the Columbia River hydropower system. Nothing in this Plan, or the participation in its development, is intended to, and shall not be interpreted to, compromise, influence, or preclude any government or agency from carrying out any past, present, or future duty or responsibility which it bears or may bear under any authority. Nothing in this Plan or the participation in its development constitutes a waiver or release of any rights, including the right to election of other remedies, or is intended to compromise, influence, or preclude any government or agency from developing and prosecuting any damage claim for those natural resource impacts identified in the Plan which are not directly and exclusively resulting from, or related to, the development and operation of the Columbia River hydropower system. Nothing in this Plan or the participation in its development is intended to, and shall not be interpreted to, waive any rights of enforcement of regulatory, adjudicatory, or police powers against potentially responsible parties for compliance with applicable laws and regulations pertaining to natural resource damages throughout the Kootenai Subbasin whether or not specifically identified in this Plan. © 2004 Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (KTOI) and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP) Citation: Kootenai Tribe of Idaho and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Impacts to Channel Bed Mobility Due to Flow Regulation, Kootenai River, Usa
    SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF IMPACTS TO CHANNEL BED MOBILITY DUE TO FLOW REGULATION, KOOTENAI RIVER, USA Michael Burke1, Research Associate, University of Idaho ([email protected]); Klaus Jorde1, Professor, University of Idaho; John M. Buffington1,2, Research Geomorphologist, USDA Forest Service; Jeffrey H. Braatne3, Assistant Professor, University of Idaho; Rohan Benjankar1, Research Associate, University of Idaho. 1Center for Ecohydraulics Research, Boise, ID 2Rocky Mountain Research Station, Boise, ID 3College of Natural Resources, Moscow, ID Abstract The regulated hydrograph of the Kootenai River between Libby Dam and Kootenay Lake has altered the natural flow regime, resulting in a significant decrease in maximum flows (60% net reduction in median 1-day annual maximum, and 77%-84% net reductions in median monthly flows for the historic peak flow months of May and June, respectively). Other key hydrologic characteristics have also been affected, such as the timing of annual extremes, and the frequency and duration of flow pulses. Moreover, Libby Dam has impeded downstream delivery of sediment from the upper 23,300 km2 of a 50,000 km2 watershed. Since completion of the facility in 1974, observed impacts to downstream channel bed and bars in semi-confined and confined reaches of the Kootenai River have included coarsening of the active channel bed, homogenization of the channel bed, disappearance of relatively fine-grained beach bars, and invasion of bar surfaces by perennial vegetative species. These impacts have led to reduced aquatic habitat heterogeneity and reduced abundance of candidate recruitment sites for riparian tree species such as black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) and native willows (Salix spp.). Limited quantitative documentation of the pre-regulation substrate composition exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Libby Varq Flood Control Impacts on Kootenay River Dikes
    MINISTRY OF ENERGY, MINES AND NATURAL GAS LIBBY VARQ FLOOD CONTROL IMPACTS ON KOOTENAY RIVER DIKES FINAL PROJECT NO: 0640-002 DISTRIBUTION: DATE: November 7, 2012 RECIPIENT: 2 copies BGC: 2 copies OTHER: 1 copy R.2.7.9 #800-1045 Howe Street Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6Z 2A9 Tel: 604.684.5900 Fax: 604.684.5909 November 7, 2012 Project No: 0640-002 Chris Trumpy Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas PO Box 9053 Station Provincial Government Victoria, BC V8W 9E2 Dear Mr. Trumpy, Re: Libby VARQ Flood Control Impacts on Kootenay River Dikes Please find enclosed a FINAL report for the above-referenced study. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at (604) 629-3850. Yours sincerely, BGC ENGINEERING INC. per: Hamish Weatherly, M.Sc., P.Geo. Senior Hydrologist Ministry of Energy, Mines and Natural Gas, November 7, 2012 Libby VARQ Flood Control Impacts on Kootenay River Dikes - FINAL Project No: 0640-002 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................... i LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. ii LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Geological Survey Geological
    THE MOYIE INDUSTRIAL PARTNERSHIP PROJECT: GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION OF THE YAHK-MOYIE LAKE AREA, SOUTHEASTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA (82F/OlE, 82G/04W, 82F/08E, 82Gi05W) By D. A. Brown, B.C. Geological Survey Branch, and R.D. Woodfill, Abitibi Mining Corp and SEDEX Mining Corp KEYWORDS: Regional geology, Proterozoic, Purcell Supergroup, Aldridge Formation, Moyie sills, peperites, SEDEX deposits, tourmalinite, fragment&, mineralization, aeromagnetic data. INTRODUCTION Exploration Inc., SEDEX Mining Corp., H6y and Diakow (19X2), and H6y (1993) in the Moyie Lake area. This article summarizes results of the Moyie Generous financial, technical and logistical support by Industrial Partnership Project after completion of two these companies allowed for the success of this project. months of fieldwork in the Yahk, Grassy Mountain, New drill hole, tourmalinite and fragmental databases Yahk River, and Moyie Lake map areas (82F/l, 8; are another contribution of the Moyie Project. 8264, 5) in 1997. The primary focus of this project is to provide updated compilation maps for the Aldridge Access to the map area is provided from Cranhrook via Highway 3 and by a network of logging roads that Formation. The project will provide new I:50 OOO-scale Open File geologic maps based on compilation at I :20 range from well maintained to overgrown. Mapping OOO-scale. These maps draw extensively from Cominco focused on hvo areas that are dominated by the Aldridge Ltd.‘s geological maps, recent work by Abitibi Mining Formation, the core of the Moyie anticline, and the structural panel between the Moyie and Old Baldy faults Corp. in the Yahk area; and Kennecott Canada (Figure I).
    [Show full text]
  • Bathymetric Surveys of the Kootenai River Near Bonners Ferry, Idaho—Water Year 2011
    Prepared in cooperation with the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Bathymetric Surveys of the Kootenai River near Bonners Ferry, Idaho—Water Year 2011 Data Series 694 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover: Ambush Rock (foreground) and Clifty Mountain (background) photographed from the Kootenai River, Idaho. Photograph taken June 2011 by Ryan L. Fosness, U.S. Geological Survey. Back cover: Tree root wads used to protect the levees along the Kootenai River near River Mile 134, Idaho. Photograph taken June 2011 by Ryan L. Fosness, U.S. Geological Survey. Bathymetric Surveys of the Kootenai River near Bonners Ferry, Idaho—Water Year 2011 By Ryan L. Fosness Prepared in cooperation with the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Data Series 694 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]