DOCSLIB.ORG

THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA Natural Final Causality At

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA Natural Final Causality At THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Natural Final Causality at the University of Paris from 1250 – 1360 A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Philosophy Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Jordan D. Watts Washington, D.C. 2015 Natural Final Causality at the University of Paris from 1250 – 1360 Jordan D. Watts, Ph.D. Director: Timothy B. Noone, Ph.D. There has not yet been a book-length examination of the significant medieval developments in doctrines of natural final causality at the University of Paris. The current study finds that, during this time, natural final causes cease to be recognized as unique metaphysical principles of causality. They are reduced to natural efficient causes that exhibit determined activities. The critique is subtle, however, because even though natural final causality is all but eliminated as a metaphysically unique cause of natural activity, natural directionality is never in doubt. The Parisian conversation on natural final causality evidences an appropriation and critique of Aristotelian natural philosophy, aided by Avicenna’s and Averroes’ interpretation of him. The dissertation begins by noting Aristotle’s doctrine. He holds that natural final causality is recognizable in natural substances. Final causality has its own unique causal role in natural activities. He recognizes that natural agents also act for the sake of a first final cause, but provides a limited description of the way the first final cause causes. Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus essentially maintain the Aristotelian doctrine on the recognizability and causality of the natural final cause from Aristotle. However, Scotus plants the seed for a reduction of final causality to efficient causality through his distinction between nature (a determined cause) and will (a free rational cause). While Aristotle argues that natural final causality is evident through the causal similarities between natural and rational agency, Scotus’ distinction denies that a nature and a will are similar causal principles. William of Ockham appropriates Scotus’ distinction between nature and will, criticizing Aristotle’s argumentation. For Ockham, final causality is proper to rational (free) causes and, for this reason, cannot be found in natural causes. Natural agents have a determined, internal, efficient principle of direction. To attribute final causality to natural agents is to confuse the rational and the natural. John Buridan maintains Ockham’s affirmation that natural direction should be explained as the determination of natural efficient causality. However, he holds that any efficient cause that causes for the sake of itself can be called a final cause. While he reintroduces discussion of final causality in nature, he notes that many of the results we experience from natural causes may not be the proper results that the natural agents were directed to bring about. This limits our ability to discuss natural final causes outside of acknowledging that natural agents have them. This dissertation by Jordan D. Watts fulfills the dissertation requirement for the doctoral degree in philosophy approved by Timothy B. Noone, Ph.D., as Director, and by Thérèse-Anne Druart, Ph.D. and Kevin White, Ph.D., as Readers. _________________________________ Timothy B. Noone, Ph.D., Director _________________________________ Thérèse-Anne Druart, Ph.D., Reader _________________________________ Kevin White, Ph.D., Reader ii Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my loving parents, Mike and Sue, who have supported and encouraged me throughout my education. I also dedicate it to my beautiful wife, Maggie, without whose love and support this dissertation might have never been finished. iii Table of Contents Dedication ................................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ iv Siglia and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... vi Overview ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Latin Aristotle and His Non-Parisian Commentators ................................................... 13 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 The Latin Aristotle on Final Causality .......................................................................................... 14 1.3 Recognizeability of Natural Final Causality in Aristotle ........................................................... 15 1.4 Irreducibility of Final Causality in Aristotle ............................................................................... 33 1.5 How a Final Cause Causes in Aristotle .......................................................................................... 36 1.6 First Mover as Final Cause in Aristotle ......................................................................................... 44 1.7 Aristotle: Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 50 1.8 Avicenna: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 51 1.9 Recognizability of Natural Final Causality in Avicenna ............................................................ 53 1.10 Irreducibility of Final Cause for Avicenna ................................................................................. 71 1.11 How a Final Cause Causes ............................................................................................................. 72 1.12 First Cause as Final Cause in Avicenna....................................................................................... 81 1.13 Avicenna: Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 84 1.14 Averroes: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 87 1.15 Recognizability of Natural Final Causality in Averroes .......................................................... 89 1.16 How a Final Cause Causes for Averroes ..................................................................................... 97 1.17 First Mover as Final Cause in Averroes ...................................................................................... 99 1.18 Averroes: Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 108 1.19 Chapter 1: Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 109 Chapter 2: The Parisian Appropriation of Aristotle ....................................................................... 112 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 112 2.2 Aquinas: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 114 iv 2.3 Recognition of Natural Final Causality in Aquinas ................................................................... 115 2.4 How a Natural Final Cause Causes for Aquinas......................................................................... 127 2.5 Final Causality and the First Final Cause in Aquinas ............................................................... 138 2.6 Aquinas: conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 153 2.7 Scotus: Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 156 2.8 Recognizability of Natural Final Causality in Scotus ............................................................... 158 2.9 How a Final Cause Causes for Scotus .......................................................................................... 162 2.10 The First Final Cause for Scotus ................................................................................................ 184 2.11 Scotus: Conclusion........................................................................................................................ 191 2.12 Chapter 2: Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 193 Chapter 3: Critique of Aristotle by William of Ockham ................................................................. 198 3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 198 3.2 Recognizability of Final Causality for Ockham ......................................................................... 200 3.3 How a Natural Final Cause Causes ............................................................................................... 226 3.4 Final Causality and God ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scholarships and Special Funds 1 Scholarships and Special Funds
    Scholarships and Special Funds 1 Scholarships and Special Funds An asterisk (*) indicates a scholarship or special fund that was transferred by Andover Newton Theological School (now Andover Newton Seminary at Yale Divinity School) in 2019. Scholarships The Bradford E. Ableson Scholarship was established in 2008 by Julia Ableson to honor her husband, the Rev. Dr. Bradford Edward Ableson, M.Div. 1985. The scholarship is awarded annually with a preference for students who are postulants or candidates for Holy Orders of the Episcopal Church and demonstrate superior promise for pastoral ministry. The Harry Baker Adams Scholarship was created in 1993 by a gi from Frank P. Wendt, charter member and chairman emeritus of the Yale Divinity School Board of Advisors. The scholarship has since been augmented by numerous gis from other friends, students, and admirers of Professor Harry B. Adams, B.A. 1947, B.D. 1951, who has touched the lives of so many who have attended the School. The purpose of the scholarship is to attract “the brightest and the best.” The Rev. Dr. Marilyn McCord Adams Scholarship Fund was established in 2020 by the Rev. Christopher T. Worthley, M.Div. 2002, and Christian M. Clough, M.A.R. 2003, for the benefit of deserving students affiliated with Berkeley Divinity School at Yale. *The Rev. Dr. Paul R. Adkins Scholarship is awarded with a preference toward United Church of Christ students and students in the Andover Newton Seminary program. The African Methodist Episcopal Church Scholarship was established in 2007 by Bishop Frederick Hilborn Talbot, M.Div. 1957, and his friends and family to honor him for receiving the YDS “Lux et Veritas” Alumni Award.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The rP oblem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions Edward Matusek University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Matusek, Edward, "The rP oblem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3733 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Problem of Evil in Augustine’s Confessions by Edward A. Matusek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. Joanne Waugh, Ph.D. Charles B. Guignon, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 14, 2011 Keywords: theodicy, privation, metaphysical evil, Manichaeism, Neo-Platonism Copyright © 2011, Edward A. Matusek i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract iii Chapter One: Introduction to Augustine’s Confessions and the Present Study 1 Purpose and Background of the Study 2 Literary and Historical Considerations of Confessions 4 Relevance of the Study for Various
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine on Knowledge
    Augustine on Knowledge Divine Illumination as an Argument Against Scepticism ANITA VAN DER BOS RMA: RELIGION & CULTURE Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Research Master Thesis s2217473, April 2017 FIRST SUPERVISOR: dr. M. Van Dijk SECOND SUPERVISOR: dr. dr. F.L. Roig Lanzillotta 1 2 Content Augustine on Knowledge ........................................................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 4 Preface .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 7 The life of Saint Augustine ................................................................................................................... 9 The influence of the Contra Academicos .......................................................................................... 13 Note on the quotations ........................................................................................................................ 14 1. Scepticism ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Projectile Motion Acc
    PHY1033C/HIS3931/IDH 3931 : Discovering Physics: The Universe and Humanity’s Place in It Fall 2016 Prof. Peter Hirschfeld, Physics Announcements • HW 1 due today; HW 2 posted, due Sept. 13 • Lab 1 today 2nd hour • Reading: Gregory Chs. 2,3 Wertheim (coursepack), Lindberg (coursepack) • HW/office hours 10:40 M,T, 11:45 W email/call to make appt. if these are bad Last time Improvements to Aristotle/Eudoxus Appolonius of Perga (~20 -190 BCE) : proposed: 1) eccentric orbits (planet goes in circle at const. speed, but Earth was off center) 2) epicycles (planet moves on own circle [epicycle] around a point that travels in another circle [deferent] around E. His model explained • variation in brightness of planets • changes in angular speed Ptolemy (AD 100 – c. 170): Almagest summarized ancient ideas about solar system. He himself proposed “equant point”: eccentric point about which planet moved with constant angular speed. Not true uniform circular motion, but explained data better. Ptolemaic universe (Equant point suppressed) • Note: this picture puts planets at a distance relative to Earth corresponding to our modern knowledge, but Ptolemaic system did not predict order of planets (or care!) • Exception: inner planets had to have orbits that kept them between Earth and Sun • Why epicycles? Not asked. Clicker quickies Q1: Ptolemy’s model explained retrograde motion of the planets. This means that A. Some planets moved clockwise while others moved counterclockwise along their orbits B. Some planets moved outside the plane of the ecliptic C. Some planets were observed to stop in the sky, move apparently backwards along their path, forward again D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logic of Where and While in the 13Th and 14Th Centuries
    The Logic of Where and While in the 13th and 14th Centuries Sara L. Uckelman Department of Philosophy, Durham University Abstract Medieval analyses of molecular propositions include many non-truthfunctional con- nectives in addition to the standard modern binary connectives (conjunction, dis- junction, and conditional). Two types of non-truthfunctional molecular propositions considered by a number of 13th- and 14th-century authors are temporal and local propositions, which combine atomic propositions with ‘while’ and ‘where’. Despite modern interest in the historical roots of temporal and tense logic, medieval analy- ses of ‘while’ propositions are rarely discussed in modern literature, and analyses of ‘where’ propositions are almost completely overlooked. In this paper we introduce 13th- and 14th-century views on temporal and local propositions, and connect the medieval theories with modern temporal and spatial counterparts. Keywords: Jean Buridan, Lambert of Auxerre, local propositions, Roger Bacon, temporal propositions, Walter Burley, William of Ockham 1 Introduction Modern propositional logicians are familiar with three kinds of compound propositions: Conjunctions, disjunctions, and conditionals. Thirteenth-century logicians were more liberal, admitting variously five, six, seven, or more types of compound propositions. In the middle of the 13th century, Lambert of Auxerre 1 in his Logic identified six types of ‘hypothetical’ (i.e., compound, as opposed to atomic ‘categorical’, i.e., subject-predicate, propositions) propo- sitions: the three familiar ones, plus causal, local, and temporal propositions [17, 99]. Another mid-13th century treatise, Roger Bacon’s Art and Science of Logic¶ , lists these six and adds expletive propositions (those which use the connective ‘however’), and other ones not explicitly classified such as “Socrates 1 The identity of the author of this text is not known for certain.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Buridan Qui a Étudié Les Arts Libéraux S’Est Intéressé Aux Dis- Cussions Sur Le Modèle De L’Univers Et Sur La Théorie Du Mouvement D’Aristote
    Jean Buridan qui a étudié les arts libéraux s’est intéressé aux dis- cussions sur le modèle de l’univers et sur la théorie du mouvement d’Aristote. Il a redécouvert et diffusé la théorie de l’impetus. Éla- borée à Alexandrie, cette théorie visait à combler une lacune de la théorie du mouvement d’Aristote. Jean Buridan 1295-1358 Jean Buridan Discussion du géocentrisme Si la terre reste toujours immobile au Jean Buridan est né à Béthune au Pas de centre du monde; ou non ... [et] si, en Calais, en 1295 et est mort vers 1358. supposant que la terre est en mouve- Il étudie à l’université de Paris où il est ment de rotation autour de son cen- un disciple de Guillaume d’Occam. Tra- tre et de ses propres pôles, tous les phé- ditionnellement, pour se préparer à une nomènes que nous observons peuvent carrière en philosophie, les aspirants étu- être sauvés? dient la théologie. Buridan choisit d’étu- dier les arts libéraux (voir encadré) plu- Peut-on, en considérant que la Terre est tôt que la théologie et il préserve son in- en rotation sur elle-même, expliquer dépendance en demeurant clerc séculier tous les phénomènes que nous obser- plutôt qu’en se joignant à un ordre reli- vons ? Buridan donne une série d’argu- gieux. ments en accord avec la rotation de la Buridan enseigne la philosophie à Pa- Terre et une autre série à l’encontre de ris et est élu recteur de Angleterre Calais Belgique cette hypothèse. Il écrit : Lille Allemagne l’Université en 1328 et en Béthune Il est vrai, sans aucun doute, que si la 1340.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION 1. Medical Humanism and Natural Philosophy
    INTRODUCTION 1. Medical Humanism and Natural Philosophy The Renaissance was one of the most innovative periods in Western civi- lization.1 New waves of expression in fijine arts and literature bloomed in Italy and gradually spread all over Europe. A new approach with a strong philological emphasis, called “humanism” by historians, was also intro- duced to scholarship. The intellectual fecundity of the Renaissance was ensured by the intense activity of the humanists who were engaged in collecting, editing, translating and publishing the ancient literary heri- tage, mostly in Greek and Latin, which had hitherto been scarcely read or entirely unknown to the medieval world. The humanists were active not only in deciphering and interpreting these “newly recovered” texts but also in producing original writings inspired by the ideas and themes they found in the ancient sources. Through these activities, Renaissance humanist culture brought about a remarkable moment in Western intel- lectual history. The effforts and legacy of those humanists, however, have not always been appreciated in their own right by historians of philoso- phy and science.2 In particular, the impact of humanism on the evolution of natural philosophy still awaits thorough research by specialists. 1 By “Renaissance,” I refer to the period expanding roughly from the fijifteenth century to the beginning of the seventeenth century, when the humanist movement begun in Italy was difffused in the transalpine countries. 2 Textbooks on the history of science have often minimized the role of Renaissance humanism. See Pamela H. Smith, “Science on the Move: Recent Trends in the History of Early Modern Science,” Renaissance Quarterly 62 (2009), 345–75, esp.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Causes in Aristotle and Sankara
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Religious Studies Honors Theses Department of Religious Studies 9-11-2006 Types of Causes in Aristotle and Sankara Brandie Martinez-Bedard Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_hontheses Recommended Citation Martinez-Bedard, Brandie, "Types of Causes in Aristotle and Sankara." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2006. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/rs_hontheses/3 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Religious Studies at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religious Studies Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TYPES OF CAUSES IN ARISTOTLE AND SANKARA by BRANDIE MARTINEZ BEDARD Under the Direction of Kathryn McClymond and Sandra Dwyer ABSTRACT This paper is a comparative project between a philosopher from the Western tradition, Aristotle, and a philosopher from the Eastern tradition, Sankara. These two philosophers have often been thought to oppose one another in their thoughts, but I will argue that they are similar in several aspects. I will explore connections between Aristotle and Sankara, primarily in their theories of causation. I will argue that a closer examination of both Aristotelian and Advaita Vedanta philosophy, of which Sankara is considered the most prominent thinker, will yield significant similarities that will give new insights into the thoughts
    [Show full text]
  • Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
    MIDWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY UNCHANGING BEAUTY: FAITH AS THE APPREHENSION OF THE IMMUTABLE GOD’S GLORY REVEALED IN THE SON A PAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COURSE DR 01-37395 ADVANCED SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY BY SAMUEL G. PARKISON KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI AUGUST, 19 2018 Introduction Two topics that have generated considerable attention in the field of systematic theology as of late are aesthetics1 and classical theism.2 Though neither topic is new to the Church’s life, each have experienced relative neglect and resurgence. However, notwithstanding how much attention both these theological loci have received, they are not often discussed in relation to one another. This paper seeks to explore their convergence in Christology. To be specific, we seek to answer: is the doctrine of divine immutability compatible with an aesthetic-soteriology, in which Christological glory elicits faith? This paper will contend for the affirmative: indeed, not only is divine immutability compatible with such an aesthetic-soteriology, it is necessary for it to work. Christology will thus serve as the gravitational center for this study, pulling these two areas of interest together. The aesthetic interest of saving faith is Christ, the Word made flesh. Likewise, the central challenge to divine immutability is Christ, the Word made flesh. Structurally, this paper will move from an examination of the aesthetic dimension of saving faith, to Christ’s revelatory role of the immutable God in the incarnation, and will conclude with a brief consideration and response to divine immutability’s challenge in light of the incarnation. Thus, we will show that saving faith in Jesus—as a response to his irresistible beauty—results in mediated access to the unchanging, beautiful Triune God.
    [Show full text]
  • Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Spring 2010 Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Jason Skirry University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Skirry, Jason, "Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 179. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Abstract This dissertation presents a unified interpretation of Malebranche’s philosophical system that is based on his Augustinian theory of the mind’s perfection, which consists in maximizing the mind’s ability to successfully access, comprehend, and follow God’s Order through practices that purify and cognitively enhance the mind’s attention. I argue that the mind’s perfection figures centrally in Malebranche’s philosophy and is the main hub that connects and reconciles the three fundamental principles of his system, namely, his occasionalism, divine illumination, and freedom. To demonstrate this, I first present, in chapter one, Malebranche’s philosophy within the historical and intellectual context of his membership in the French Oratory, arguing that the Oratory’s particular brand of Augustinianism, initiated by Cardinal Bérulle and propagated by Oratorians such as Andre Martin, is at the core of his philosophy and informs his theory of perfection. Next, in chapter two, I explicate Augustine’s own theory of perfection in order to provide an outline, and a basis of comparison, for Malebranche’s own theory of perfection.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Philosophy
    An Introduction to Philosophy W. Russ Payne Bellevue College Copyright (cc by nc 4.0) 2015 W. Russ Payne Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document with attribution under the terms of Creative Commons: Attribution Noncommercial 4.0 International or any later version of this license. A copy of the license is found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 1 Contents Introduction ………………………………………………. 3 Chapter 1: What Philosophy Is ………………………….. 5 Chapter 2: How to do Philosophy ………………….……. 11 Chapter 3: Ancient Philosophy ………………….………. 23 Chapter 4: Rationalism ………….………………….……. 38 Chapter 5: Empiricism …………………………………… 50 Chapter 6: Philosophy of Science ………………….…..… 58 Chapter 7: Philosophy of Mind …………………….……. 72 Chapter 8: Love and Happiness …………………….……. 79 Chapter 9: Meta Ethics …………………………………… 94 Chapter 10: Right Action ……………………...…………. 108 Chapter 11: Social Justice …………………………...…… 120 2 Introduction The goal of this text is to present philosophy to newcomers as a living discipline with historical roots. While a few early chapters are historically organized, my goal in the historical chapters is to trace a developmental progression of thought that introduces basic philosophical methods and frames issues that remain relevant today. Later chapters are topically organized. These include philosophy of science and philosophy of mind, areas where philosophy has shown dramatic recent progress. This text concludes with four chapters on ethics, broadly construed. I cover traditional theories of right action in the third of these. Students are first invited first to think about what is good for themselves and their relationships in a chapter of love and happiness. Next a few meta-ethical issues are considered; namely, whether they are moral truths and if so what makes them so.
    [Show full text]
  • What Sin?? John F
    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 43 | Number 3 Article 7 August 1976 Hate the Sin But Love the Sinner. Sin? What Sin?? John F. Russell Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended Citation Russell, John F. (1976) "Hate the Sin But Love the Sinner. Sin? What Sin??," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 43: No. 3, Article 7. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol43/iss3/7 Hate the Sin But Love the Sinner. Sin? What Sin?? John F. Russell, J.D. (This is a greatly abbreviated theologians and others who have adaptation from a chapter in Dr. expressed their scholarly and oth­ Russell's cur r e n t book-length erwise knowledgeable views on manuscript on the homosexual the matter and the impact that issue in all the major religious de­ the various avenues of approach nominations in the United States. will have on church, society, and In gathering material for the especially the individual.) book, Dr. Russell, who has been The N ew Catholic Encyclope­ a professional scholar on organ­ dia describes the homosexual act ized homosexual activities for as a "grave transgression of the over two decades, has interviewed divine will." literally hundreds of religious and lay officials of all denominations Right? along with numerous gay activ­ The National Conference of ists. In addition, he has re­ Catholic B ish 0 p s , speaking searched well over 10,000 articles, through its Principles to Guide publications, and news items on Confessors in Questions of Homo­ the subject. The material present­ sexuality, says that homosexual ed here barely penetrates even practices are a "grave violation of this single aspect of the multi­ the law of God." fac eted scope of the total problem realized by the religious and lay Right? communities, homosexual and And the most recent expression heterosexual alike.
    [Show full text]