DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report Final Report AQUAFIN CRC PROJECT 1B3: INCREASING THE PROFITABILITY OF SNAPPER FARMING BY IMPROVING HATCHERY PRACTICES AND DIETS VOLUME 3: FINGERLING PRODUCTION AND HEALTH D. Stewart Fielder, Ashley Roberts-Thomson, Mark A. Booth, Geoff L. Allan and Robert Adlard September 2008 FRDC Pro ject No. 2001/208 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Entry ISBN 1441-8487 © NSW Department of Primary Industries, Aquafin CRC and Fisheries Research and Development Corporation This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. Every attempt has been made to provide accurate information in this document. However, no liability attaches to Aquafin CRC, its Participant organisations or any other organisation or individual concerned with the supply of information or preparation of this document for any consequences of using the information contained in the document. Published by: NSW Department of Primary Industries (now incorporating NSW Fisheries) AQUAFIN CRC PROJECT 1B.3: INCREASING THE PROFITABILITY OF SNAPPER FARMING BY IMPROVING HATCHERY PRACTICES AND DIETS VOLUME 3: FINGERLING PRODUCTION AND HEALTH D. Stewart Fielder, Ashley Roberts-Thomson, Mark A. Booth, Geoff L. Allan and Robert Adlard September 2008 FRDC Project No. 2001/208 Aquafin CRC is established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program Contents i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents ................................................................................................................................................ i List of acronyms................................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................... ii List of figures ................................................................................................................................................... iii List of tables...................................................................................................................................................... v Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................... vii Non-technical summary.................................................................................................................................. viii 1. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 13 2. NEED ................................................................................................................................................. 18 3. OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................................... 19 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................. 20 4.1 Replacement of Artemia in the larval rearing diets of Australian snapper, Pagrus auratus... 20 4.2 Comparison of commercial weaning diets for larval rearing of Australian snapper, Pagrus auratus.................................................................................................................................... 29 4.3 Effect of polyhouse covers and addition of Artemia on larval rearing of snapper in fertilised ponds. ..................................................................................................................................... 32 4.4 Determination of the optimal age of larvae and protocols for stocking snapper Pagrus auratus larvae in fertilised ponds........................................................................................................ 42 4.5 Evaluation of seawater zooplankton production in plastic-lined ponds for extensive and intensive culture of snapper larvae ........................................................................................ 47 4.6 Effects of photoperiod and feeding frequency on performance of newly weaned Australian snapper Pagrus auratus ......................................................................................................... 51 4.7 Effect of feeding regime and fish size on weight gain, feed intake and gastric evacuation rates in juvenile snapper Pagrus auratus........................................................................................ 61 4.8 Amyloodinium ocellatum: Introduction and literature review................................................. 76 4.9 Investigating cryopreservation of Amyloodinium ocellatum ................................................... 88 4.10 Amyloodinium ocellatum taxonomic investigations using ITS (internal transcribed spacer region) .................................................................................................................................... 93 4.11 Aerosol dispersal strategies of the fish pathogen, Amyloodinium ocellatum ........................ 106 4.12 Detection of the fish pathogen, Amyloodinium ocellatum using PCR based diagnostic assays .............................................................................................................................................. 114 4.13 Contemporary chemotherapeutic management of Amyloodinium ocellatum in aquaculture 120 5. BENEFITS AND ADOPTION ................................................................................................................ 128 6. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT................................................................................................................. 130 7. PLANNED OUTCOMES ...................................................................................................................... 131 8. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................. 132 9. APPENDICES..................................................................................................................................... 134 9.1 Intellectual Property.............................................................................................................. 134 9.2 Staff........................................................................................................................................ 134 Aquafin CRC Snapper final report, Fielder et al. Project No. 2001/208 ii List of Acronyms LIST OF ACRONYMS ADC Apparent digestibility coefficient ANOVA Analysis of variance CHO Carbohydrates CP Crude protein DE Digestible energy DNA Deoxy ribonucleic acid DO Dissolved oxygen DP Digestible protein FCR Food conversion ratio GE Gross energy GTT Glucose Tolerance Test ITS Internal transcribed spacer region LSU Large subunit ribosomal region OM Organic matter PCR Polymerase chain reaction PSFC Port Stephens Fisheries Centre rDNA Ribosomal deoxy ribonucleic acid SARDI South Australian Research and Development Institute SSU Small subunit ribosomal region UV Ultraviolet Project No. 2001/208 Aquafin CRC Snapper farming final report, Fielder et al. ii Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work formed part of a project of Aquafin CRC, and received funds from the Australian Government’s CRCs Program, the Fisheries R&D Corporation and CRC Participants. We thank the staff of the Port Stephens Fisheries Centre for their assistance during this project. We especially thank Luke Cheviot, Luke Vandenberg, Paul Beevers, Geraldine McMahon, Ben Kearney, Debra Ballagh, Bill Bardsley and Brad Tucker for their significant technical expertise and support. Dr’s Wayne O’Connor and Michael Dove provided valuable editorial comments during preparation of this report. We also gratefully acknowledge Mrs Helena Heasman for her tireless and good humoured assistance with preparation, compilation and editing of this report. For assistance with the health component of this volume we thank Professor Bob Lester and Dr Andy Barnes for their guidance and Ms Jessica Worthington Wilmer, Stephen Wesche, Justice Baiano, Tim Green, Jess Hill and other staff at the CMS Laboratories. We also thank the staff of the Marine Parisitology Laboratory of the University of Queensland. Project No. 2001/208 Aquafin CRC Snapper farming final report, Fielder et al. List of Figures iii LIST OF FIGURES Section 4.1: Replacement of atremia in the larval rearing diets of Australian snapper Pagrus auratus FIGURE 1 FEEDING SCHEDULE USED FOR EXPERIMENTAL TREATMENTS ARTEMIA AND NIL ARTEMIA 232 FIGURE 2 TOTAL LENGTH OF SNAPPER LARVAE FED DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF ATREMIA AND ML DIET ..................................................................................................................................... 25 FIGURE 3 GROWTH (TL) OF SNAPPER FINGERLINGS FROM 14 TO 46 DAYS POST HATCH USING FEEDING SCHEDULES WITH ARTEMIA AND WITHOUT ARTEMIA. ........................................................... 26 Section 4.2: Comparison of commercial weaning diets for larval rearing of Australian snapper Pagrus auratus FIGURE 1 SURVIVAL OF SNAPPER LARVAE FROM 23 TO 44 DAYS AFTER HATCHERY FED THREE DIFFERENT WEANING
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus (VHSV): on the Search for Determinants Important for Virulence in Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Mykiss
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Nov 08, 2017 Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss Olesen, Niels Jørgen; Skall, H. F.; Kurita, J.; Mori, K.; Ito, T. Published in: 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Olesen, N. J., Skall, H. F., Kurita, J., Mori, K., & Ito, T. (2015). Viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV): on the search for determinants important for virulence in rainbow trout oncorhynchus mykiss. In 17th International Conference on Diseases of Fish And Shellfish: Abstract book (pp. 147-147). [O-139] Las Palmas: European Association of Fish Pathologists. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. DISCLAIMER: The organizer takes no responsibility for any of the content stated in the abstracts.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Genetic Diversity
    1.13 NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY Dennis P. Gordon National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington 6022, New Zealand ABSTRACT: The known genetic diversity represented by the New Zealand biota is reviewed and summarised, largely based on a recently published New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. All kingdoms and eukaryote phyla are covered, updated to refl ect the latest phylogenetic view of Eukaryota. The total known biota comprises a nominal 57 406 species (c. 48 640 described). Subtraction of the 4889 naturalised-alien species gives a biota of 52 517 native species. A minimum (the status of a number of the unnamed species is uncertain) of 27 380 (52%) of these species are endemic (cf. 26% for Fungi, 38% for all marine species, 46% for marine Animalia, 68% for all Animalia, 78% for vascular plants and 91% for terrestrial Animalia). In passing, examples are given both of the roles of the major taxa in providing ecosystem services and of the use of genetic resources in the New Zealand economy. Key words: Animalia, Chromista, freshwater, Fungi, genetic diversity, marine, New Zealand, Prokaryota, Protozoa, terrestrial. INTRODUCTION Article 10b of the CBD calls for signatories to ‘Adopt The original brief for this chapter was to review New Zealand’s measures relating to the use of biological resources [i.e. genetic genetic resources. The OECD defi nition of genetic resources resources] to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on biological is ‘genetic material of plants, animals or micro-organisms of diversity [e.g. genetic diversity]’ (my parentheses).
    [Show full text]
  • Unfolding the Secrets of Coral–Algal Symbiosis
    The ISME Journal (2015) 9, 844–856 & 2015 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/15 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Unfolding the secrets of coral–algal symbiosis Nedeljka Rosic1, Edmund Yew Siang Ling2, Chon-Kit Kenneth Chan3, Hong Ching Lee4, Paulina Kaniewska1,5,DavidEdwards3,6,7,SophieDove1,8 and Ove Hoegh-Guldberg1,8,9 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; 2University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia; 3School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; 4The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 5Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia; 6School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; 7Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia; 8ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia and 9Global Change Institute and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia Dinoflagellates from the genus Symbiodinium form a mutualistic symbiotic relationship with reef- building corals. Here we applied massively parallel Illumina sequencing to assess genetic similarity and diversity among four phylogenetically diverse dinoflagellate clades (A, B, C and D) that are commonly associated with corals. We obtained more than 30 000 predicted genes for each Symbiodinium clade, with a majority of the aligned transcripts corresponding to sequence data sets of symbiotic dinoflagellates and o2% of sequences having bacterial or other foreign origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbiodinium Genomes Reveal Adaptive Evolution of Functions Related to Symbiosis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/198762; this version posted October 5, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Article 2 Symbiodinium genomes reveal adaptive evolution of 3 functions related to symbiosis 4 Huanle Liu1, Timothy G. Stephens1, Raúl A. González-Pech1, Victor H. Beltran2, Bruno 5 Lapeyre3,4, Pim Bongaerts5, Ira Cooke3, David G. Bourne2,6, Sylvain Forêt7,*, David J. 6 Miller3, Madeleine J. H. van Oppen2,8, Christian R. Voolstra9, Mark A. Ragan1 and Cheong 7 Xin Chan1,10,† 8 1Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, 9 Australia 10 2Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia 11 3ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and Department of Molecular and Cell 12 Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia 13 4Laboratoire d’excellence CORAIL, Centre de Recherches Insulaires et Observatoire de 14 l’Environnement, Moorea 98729, French Polynesia 15 5Global Change Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia 16 6College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, 17 Australia 18 7Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia 19 8School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/198762; this version posted October 5, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Symbiotic Life of Symbiodinium in the Open Ocean Within a New Species of Calcifying Ciliate (Tiarina Sp.)
    The ISME Journal (2016) 10, 1424–1436 © 2016 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/16 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE The symbiotic life of Symbiodinium in the open ocean within a new species of calcifying ciliate (Tiarina sp.) Solenn Mordret1,2,5, Sarah Romac1,2, Nicolas Henry1,2, Sébastien Colin1,2, Margaux Carmichael1,2, Cédric Berney1,2, Stéphane Audic1,2, Daniel J Richter1,2, Xavier Pochon3,4, Colomban de Vargas1,2 and Johan Decelle1,2,6 1EPEP—Evolution des Protistes et des Ecosystèmes Pélagiques—team, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Roscoff, France; 2CNRS, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Roscoff, France; 3Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand and 4Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Symbiotic partnerships between heterotrophic hosts and intracellular microalgae are common in tropical and subtropical oligotrophic waters of benthic and pelagic marine habitats. The iconic example is the photosynthetic dinoflagellate genus Symbiodinium that establishes mutualistic symbioses with a wide diversity of benthic hosts, sustaining highly biodiverse reef ecosystems worldwide. Paradoxically, although various species of photosynthetic dinoflagellates are prevalent eukaryotic symbionts in pelagic waters, Symbiodinium has not yet been reported in symbiosis within oceanic plankton, despite its high propensity for the symbiotic lifestyle. Here we report a new pelagic photosymbiosis between a calcifying ciliate host and the microalga Symbiodinium in surface ocean waters. Confocal and scanning electron microscopy, together with an 18S rDNA-based phylogeny, showed that the host is a new ciliate species closely related to Tiarina fusus (Colepidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Ciliate Diversity, Community Structure, and Novel Taxa in Lakes of the Mcmurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica
    Reference: Biol. Bull. 227: 175–190. (October 2014) © 2014 Marine Biological Laboratory Ciliate Diversity, Community Structure, and Novel Taxa in Lakes of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica YUAN XU1,*†, TRISTA VICK-MAJORS2, RACHAEL MORGAN-KISS3, JOHN C. PRISCU2, AND LINDA AMARAL-ZETTLER4,5,*࿣ 1Laboratory of Protozoology, Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China; 2Montana State University, Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, 334 Leon Johnson Hall, Bozeman, Montana 59717; 3Department of Microbiology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056; 4The Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543; and 5Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912 Abstract. We report an in-depth survey of next-genera- trends in dissolved oxygen concentration and salinity may tion DNA sequencing of ciliate diversity and community play a critical role in structuring ciliate communities. A structure in two permanently ice-covered McMurdo Dry PCR-based strategy capitalizing on divergent eukaryotic V9 Valley lakes during the austral summer and autumn (No- hypervariable region ribosomal RNA gene targets unveiled vember 2007 and March 2008). We tested hypotheses on the two new genera in these lakes. A novel taxon belonging to relationship between species richness and environmental an unknown class most closely related to Cryptocaryon conditions
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Protozoan Infections in Farmed Fish from Brazil: Diagnosis
    Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária ISSN: 0103-846X [email protected] Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária Brasil Laterça Martins, Mauricio; Cardoso, Lucas; Marchiori, Natalia; Benites de Pádua, Santiago Protozoan infections in farmed fish from Brazil: diagnosis and pathogenesis. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, vol. 24, núm. 1, enero-marzo, 2015, pp. 1- 20 Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária Jaboticabal, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=397841495001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Review Article Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol., Jaboticabal, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1-20, jan.-mar. 2015 ISSN 0103-846X (Print) / ISSN 1984-2961 (Electronic) Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015013 Protozoan infections in farmed fish from Brazil: diagnosis and pathogenesis Infecções por protozoários em peixes cultivados no Brasil: diagnóstico e patogênese Mauricio Laterça Martins1*; Lucas Cardoso1; Natalia Marchiori2; Santiago Benites de Pádua3 1Laboratório de Sanidade de Organismos Aquáticos – AQUOS, Departamento de Aquicultura, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil 2Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina – Epagri, Campo Experimental de Piscicultura de Camboriú, Camboriú, SC, Brasil 3Aquivet Saúde Aquática, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil Received January 19, 2015 Accepted February 2, 2015 Abstract The Phylum Protozoa brings together several organisms evolutionarily different that may act as ecto or endoparasites of fishes over the world being responsible for diseases, which, in turn, may lead to economical and social impacts in different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbiodinium Genomes Reveal Adaptive Evolution of Functions Related to Coral-Dinoflagellate Symbiosis
    Corrected: Publisher correction ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s42003-018-0098-3 OPEN Symbiodinium genomes reveal adaptive evolution of functions related to coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis Huanle Liu1, Timothy G. Stephens1, Raúl A. González-Pech1, Victor H. Beltran2, Bruno Lapeyre3,4,12, Pim Bongaerts5,6, Ira Cooke4, Manuel Aranda7, David G. Bourne2,8, Sylvain Forêt3,9, David J. Miller3,4, Madeleine J.H. van Oppen2,10, Christian R. Voolstra7, Mark A. Ragan1 & Cheong Xin Chan1,11 1234567890():,; Symbiosis between dinoflagellates of the genus Symbiodinium and reef-building corals forms the trophic foundation of the world’s coral reef ecosystems. Here we present the first draft genome of Symbiodinium goreaui (Clade C, type C1: 1.03 Gbp), one of the most ubiquitous endosymbionts associated with corals, and an improved draft genome of Symbiodinium kawagutii (Clade F, strain CS-156: 1.05 Gbp) to further elucidate genomic signatures of this symbiosis. Comparative analysis of four available Symbiodinium genomes against other dinoflagellate genomes led to the identification of 2460 nuclear gene families (containing 5% of Symbiodinium genes) that show evidence of positive selection, including genes involved in photosynthesis, transmembrane ion transport, synthesis and modification of amino acids and glycoproteins, and stress response. Further, we identify extensive sets of genes for meiosis and response to light stress. These draft genomes provide a foundational resource for advancing our understanding of Symbiodinium biology and the coral-algal symbiosis. 1 Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. 2 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia. 3 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231610049 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes Article in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · September 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 961 2,825 25 authors, including: Sina M Adl Alastair Simpson University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University 118 PUBLICATIONS 8,522 CITATIONS 264 PUBLICATIONS 10,739 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Christopher E Lane David Bass University of Rhode Island Natural History Museum, London 82 PUBLICATIONS 6,233 CITATIONS 464 PUBLICATIONS 7,765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Biodiversity and ecology of soil taste amoeba View project Predator control of diversity View project All content following this page was uploaded by Smirnov Alexey on 25 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Journal of Published by the International Society of Eukaryotic Microbiology Protistologists J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 59(5), 2012 pp. 429–493 © 2012 The Author(s) Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology © 2012 International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D.
    [Show full text]
  • Shellfish Diseases and Their Management in Commercial Recirculating Systems
    Shellfish Diseases and Their Management in Commercial Recirculating Systems Ralph Elston AquaTechnics & Pacific Shellfish Institute PO Box 687 Carlsborg, WA 98324 Introduction Intensive culture of early life stages of bivalve shellfish culture has been practiced since at least the late 1950’s on an experimental basis. Production scale culture emerged in the 1970’s and today, hathcheries and nurseries produce large numbers of a variety of species of oysters, clams and scallops. The early life stage systems may be entirely or partially recirculating or static. Management of infectious diseases in these systems has been a challenge since their inception and effective health management is a requisite to successful culture. The diseases which affect early life stage shellfish in intensive production systems and the principles and practice of health management are the subject of this presentation. Shellfish Diseases and Management Diseases of bivalve shellfish affecting those reared or harvested from extensive culture primarily consist of parasitic infections and generally comprise the reportable or certifiable diseases. Due to the extensive nature of such culture, intervention options or disease control are limited. In contrast, infectious diseases known from early life stages in intensive culture systems tend to be opportunistic in nature and offer substantial opportunity for management due to the control that can be exerted at key points in the systems. In marine shellfish hatcheries, infectious organisms can enter the system from three sources: brood stock, seawater source and algal food source. Once an organism is established in the system, it may persist without further introduction. Bacterial infections are the most common opportunistic infection in shellfish hatcheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6.2-Assessment of Harmful Algae Bloom
    Maryland’s Coastal Bays: Ecosystem Health Assessment Chapter 6.2 Chapter 6.2 Assessment of harmful algae bloom species in the Maryland Coastal Bays Catherine Wazniak Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Tidewater Ecosystem Assessment, Annapolis, MD 21401 Abstract Thirteen potentially harmful algae taxa have been identified in the Maryland Coastal Bays: Aureococcus anophagefferens (brown tide), Pfiesteria piscicida and P. shumwayae, Chloromorum/ Chattonella spp., Heterosigma akashiwo, Fibrocapsa japonica, Prorocentrum minimum, Dinophysis spp., Amphidinium spp., Pseudo-nitzchia spp., Karlodinium micrum and two macroalgae genera (Gracilaria, Chaetomorpha). Presence of potentially toxic species is richest in the polluted tributaries of St. Martin River and Newport Bay. Approximately 5% of the phytoplankton species identified for Maryland’s Coastal Bays represent potentially harmful algal bloom (HAB) species. The HABs are recognized for their potentially toxic properties and, in some cases, their ability to produce large blooms negatively affecting light and dissolved oxygen resources. Brown tide (Aureococcus anophagefferens) has been the most widespread and prolific HAB species in the area in recent years, producing growth impacts to juvenile clams in test studies and potential impacts to sea grass distribution and growth (see Chapter 7.1). Macroalgal fluctuations may be evidence of a system balancing on the edge of a eutrophic (nutrient- enriched) state (see chapter 4). No evidence of toxic activity has been detected among the Coastal Bays phytoplankton. However, species such as Pseudo-nitzschia seriata, Prorocentrum minimum, Pfiesteria piscicida, Dinophysis acuminata and Karlodinium micrum have produced positive toxic bioassays or generated detectable toxins in Chesapeake Bay. Pfiesteria piscicida was retrospectively considered as the likely causative organism in a large historical fish kill on the Indian River, Delaware.
    [Show full text]
  • Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts from the Northern Gulf of Mexico CRCDU7M COPY Sea Grant Depositor
    h ' '' f MASGC-B-78-001 c. 3 A MARINE MALADIES? Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts From the Northern Gulf of Mexico CRCDU7M COPY Sea Grant Depositor NATIONAL SEA GRANT DEPOSITORY \ PELL LIBRARY BUILDING URI NA8RAGANSETT BAY CAMPUS % NARRAGANSETT. Rl 02882 Robin M. Overstreet r ii MISSISSIPPI—ALABAMA SEA GRANT CONSORTIUM MASGP—78—021 MARINE MALADIES? Worms, Germs, and Other Symbionts From the Northern Gulf of Mexico by Robin M. Overstreet Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564 This study was conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, Office of Sea Grant, under Grant No. 04-7-158-44017 and National Marine Fisheries Service, under PL 88-309, Project No. 2-262-R. TheMississippi-AlabamaSea Grant Consortium furnish ed all of the publication costs. The U.S. Government is authorized to produceand distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. Copyright© 1978by Mississippi-Alabama Sea Gram Consortium and R.M. Overstrect All rights reserved. No pari of this book may be reproduced in any manner without permission from the author. Primed by Blossman Printing, Inc.. Ocean Springs, Mississippi CONTENTS PREFACE 1 INTRODUCTION TO SYMBIOSIS 2 INVERTEBRATES AS HOSTS 5 THE AMERICAN OYSTER 5 Public Health Aspects 6 Dcrmo 7 Other Symbionts and Diseases 8 Shell-Burrowing Symbionts II Fouling Organisms and Predators 13 THE BLUE CRAB 15 Protozoans and Microbes 15 Mclazoans and their I lypeiparasites 18 Misiellaneous Microbes and Protozoans 25 PENAEID
    [Show full text]