DOCSLIB.ORG

Christmas Tree Growing in Ireland I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Christmas Tree Growing in Ireland I Christmas Tree Growing In Ireland i Christmas Tree Growing in Ireland A sectoral report outlining the opportunities and problems SECTORAL COMMITTEE Dr. Conor O'Reilly Mr. David Hasslacher Mr.William Murphy Mr. Eugene Hendrick Mr. Declan Ward Mr. John Sheridan (Co-ordinator) Dr. Denis Kelleher Professor John Gardiner (Chairman) Thanks are due to Ms. Patricia Lynch of COFORD for her work in arranging the document for publication ISBN: 0 9523938 3 2 © COFORD 1997 All rights reserved . No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means with prior permission of the publishers. Designed at Language ii Christmas Tree Growing In Ireland Contents Page Foreword iii 1. Introduction 1 2. Silviculture 2 3. Harvesting and Transport 10 4. Marketing of Christmas Trees 11 5. Decorative Foliage Production 13 6. Priority Research Needs of the Sector 14 7. Organisation of Research Funding 15 Christmas Tree Growing In Ireland iii Foreword “The walls and ceilings were so hung with living green, that it looked a perfect grove, from every part of which, bright gleaming berries glistened. The crisp leaves of holly, mistletoe and ivy reflected back the light, as if so many little mirrors had been scattered there.” A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens Decorating homesteads at Christmas time has been associated as much with the celebration of mid-winter and the need to brighten up lives at a particularly dull time of year as it is with the celebration of the birth of the founder of Christianity. Indeed it probably predates Christianity.Within the Irish tradition, the use of evergreen trees in this exercise added a new dimension. The introduction of the Christmas tree into Britain is attributed to the German born prince consort of England, Prince Albert who, in the early 1840s introduced the practice of bringing evergreen trees into households as decoration for the Christmas period. In Ireland this practice did not become widespread until the 1940s. At that time the rough top offcut of Norway spruce thinnings was the usual source of Christmas trees. As the practice became more widespread, the use of Norway spruce tops declined and purpose grown Norway spruce became the norm. Land beneath power lines subsequently became the favoured location for Christmas tree growing. The more wide-spread use of home central heating and the propensity of spruce to shed its needles, led to a move towards fir and pine. Today, the production of purpose grown fir and pine Christmas trees is an important new enterprise. As in all other enterprises, quality and price are key factors in commercial success. Irish Christmas tree production will increasingly depend upon the export market where the extra dimension of reliability will determine economic sustainability. This report is a consensus document. It is one of shared ownership between the Irish Christmas Tree Growers Association and COFORD, and outlines the main information gaps that require filling if the success of the enterprise is to be maintained. It is also a framework programme for Christmas tree research that will address these gaps. A clear manifestation of co-operation between research and industry, it is also an example of their interdependence, where commitment is twinned with focus. I would like to thank the Christmas Tree Growers Association and each individual member of the working party for their diligence and co-operation in the production of this report. I hope that it will be the means of market expansion. The work of the chairman, Professor J. Gardiner, Professor of Forestry at University College, Dublin and member of the council of COFORD is particularly appreciated. We look forwa r d to the commencement of a programme of res e a r ch and innovation that this document heralds. May it contribute to the viability of this particular forest based industry and the joy that Christmas brings. Fergal Mulloy Director COFORD April 1997 1 Christmas Tree Growing In Ireland Christmas Tree Growing in Ireland The Opportunities and Problems In recent years a range of spruces, pines and firs have 1993/4 collated these estimates and it is probable that the become available as Christmas trees, but undoubtedly the area of noble fir currently in existence is in the region of most popular species to emerge has been noble fir (Abies 1500 ha. procera REHD). The popularity of noble fir Christmas trees is due to their symmetrical shape, regular branching Since a recent estimate indicates that total production costs and blue green foliage that does not shed indoors. (including cost of land) could be as high as £25,000 per ha, Experience has shown that due to a combination of it is clear that plantations already established represent an favourable soils and climate, Ireland has a comparative investment commitment of over £50 million in the advantage in producing natural looking noble fir Christmas industry. In addition, there are considerable costs in trees. As a result interest in the business of Christmas tree harvesting/transport/marketing and infrastructure production has greatly increased over the past few years. At development. Best estimates of current output indicate a present a number of well-organised groups and a large home market for 350,000 trees in the current year with number of isolated individuals are involved at the growing 100,000 trees exported. This represents a gross market end. Typically, the smaller growers own something in the value of £6.75 million and export earnings of £1.5 million. region of 3 - 4 hectares (ha) of trees. The large groups may No estimate of employment content is available, but using be aligned with a number of growers. They generally have an American figure of one full-time job per 28 ha, the considerable experience of growing and marketing trees employment content could currently be estimated at 60 into established markets. full-time equivalents. It has been estimated that about 1500 ha of Christmas trees The development of the Christmas tree industry in Ireland have been established in Ireland. However, approximately has enormous potential to contribute to rural development three-quarters of this is owned by five major groups and the in the context of an alternative farm enterprise. It is remainder by an estimated 150 growers. The primary significant that, to-date, the industry has developed in a species grown and the age of plantations are as outlined in totally free market situation. Table 1. The Irish Christmas Tree Growers Association in Table 1: Area (ha) of Christmas Trees Grown in Ireland By Species and Age Species ‘95 ‘94 ‘93 ‘92 ‘91 ‘90 ‘89 ‘88 ‘87 Total Noble fir 405 100 100 136 143 134 71 40 19 1148 Norway spruce 13 4 3 3 3 3 5 1 35 Lodgepole pine 1 2 11 23 6 3 - - 46 Nordmann fir 5 4 4 3 5 2 7 - 30 Colorado white fir - 6 3 - - - - - 9 TOTALS 405 119 116 157 172 148 79 52 20 1268 Christmas Tree Growing In Ireland 2 Section Two: Silviculture 2.1 Site • new field provenance trials established in conjunction with Coillte Christmas Tree The general consensus is that noble fir should be planted Farms on farm properties. on deep free-draining mineral soils (similar to that used for growing malting barley) with a pH of 5.5 to 6.5. In In general terms the results from the former show that the judging the suitability of new land for growing noble fir, Oregon Coast Range provenances (Laurel Mount, Mary’s one grower insists on opening a number of soil pits to Peak and Grass Mount) are superior to many Cascade permit profile inspection. Sites for noble fir should origins for Christmas tree production. These provenances ideally be gently sloping with good air circulation and free from the general Siletz River Drainage area, although very from frost hollows. For other species, such as Norway different from each other, combine average to very spruce and lodgepole pine, good quality land, that can be vigorous height growth with good tree shape. Their drained effectively and is not exposed, may be suitable. foliage, however, is greener than the one Danish 2.2 Provenance Research provenance tested (Overguard). This latter is clearly superior in colour and is recommended for glaucous blue Provenance is undoubtedly one of the key factors in Christmas trees and/or foliage production. Other growing good quality Christmas trees or producing provenances from the Siletz River Drainage area which foliage. Most of the seed used in Irish nurseries to may be worth testing include those from the Riley/Fanno produce Christmas tree plants is imported through Coillte area and Cascade provenances such as Mount Defiance Nurseries. All of the material is of certified origin and the and McKinley Lake. In discussing provenance the certificate is issued to nursery managers on purchase. The following potential problems emerge: issues for most small scale growers would appear to be that they are not aware of the importance of seed origin • the wild sources of noble fir in the Pacific or provenance and, they are not asking nursery managers Northwest may be coming under threat for specific origins. At present, most of the noble fir seed from several fronts, comes from one of few major sources: • the Danish industry may be reluctant to continue to supply a valuable resource to a • collected seed from the Pacific North West major market competitor. (generally wild stands), •Danish sources - the result of many years Arising from these is the recognition that considerable of selection, genetic potential already exists in noble fir stands in •Irish, home collected seed from selected Ireland and the need to safeguard and develop this stands - all from the above provenances potential as a seed source.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shelterwood Method
    Shelterwood Method Characteristics •Form • Appearance --- Removal of mature crop in a series of partial cuttings which (1) stimulate seed production, (2) prepare the site and (3) make room for regeneration • Versatility --- Extremely versatile as far as use with different species and under different conditions Shelterwood Method Characteristics • Relation to Other Methods ---- Establishment of regeneration precedes the final cut • Protection of the Site • Quality Growth of Residuals ---- species? Shelterwood Method Uniform Shelterwood • Treatments applied uniformly over the whole stand. The objective of the method is to secure establishment of the new stand, but in addition to supplying seed, the shelterwood provides protection for the young seedlings. At some stage, the older trees start to interfere with growth of the new stand and must be removed. 1 Shelterwood Method Uniform Shelterwood • Thus, we are really describing sequences of harvest cuts used to secure seed, prepare the site, and then release the seedlings. Shelterwood Method Uniform Shelterwood • Cutting Sequences 1. Preparatory Cut 2. Seed Cutting 3. Removal Cutting 4. Additional Removal Cuttings Shelterwood Method Uniform Shelterwood • Normal Procedure ---- Could involve the 3 types of cutting, but normal procedure is a seed tree cutting and 1 or 2 removal cuttings. Known as a 2 or 3-cut shelterwood. Last cut is the final harvest cut. 2 Shelterwood Method Modifications • Strip Shelterwood • Group Shelterwood • Irregular Shelterwood refer to Fischer et al. 1980 --- library Shelterwood Method Advantages of Shelterwood • Reproduction is more certain • More quality growth on residuals • Protection of the site • More complete utilization of the site • Length of rotation may be shortened • Aesthetics • Possible to time cuttings with good seed year Shelterwood Method Disadvantages of Shelterwood • Often leads to overstocking • Cost of logging is greater • More skill to apply • Site prep is difficult 3 Shelterwood Method • Use of shelterwood in different forest types.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerating the Development of Old-Growth Characteristics in Second-Growth Northern Hardwoods
    United States Department of Agriculture Accelerating the Development of Old-growth Characteristics in Second-growth Northern Hardwoods Karin S. Fassnacht, Dustin R. Bronson, Brian J. Palik, Anthony W. D’Amato, Craig G. Lorimer, Karl J. Martin Forest Northern General Technical Service Research Station Report NRS-144 February 2015 Abstract Active management techniques that emulate natural forest disturbance and stand development processes have the potential to enhance species diversity, structural complexity, and spatial heterogeneity in managed forests, helping to meet goals related to biodiversity, ecosystem health, and forest resilience in the face of uncertain future conditions. There are a number of steps to complete before, during, and after deciding to use active management for this purpose. These steps include specifying objectives and identifying initial targets, recognizing and addressing contemporary stressors that may hinder the ability to meet those objectives and targets, conducting a pretreatment evaluation, developing and implementing treatments, and evaluating treatments for success of implementation and for effectiveness after application. In this report we discuss these steps as they may be applied to second-growth northern hardwood forests in the northern Lake States region, using our experience with the ongoing managed old-growth silvicultural study (MOSS) as an example. We provide additional examples from other applicable studies across the region. Quality Assurance This publication conforms to the Northern Research Station’s Quality Assurance Implementation Plan which requires technical and policy review for all scientific publications produced or funded by the Station. The process included a blind technical review by at least two reviewers, who were selected by the Assistant Director for Research and unknown to the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Silviculture Is Trees
    Forests and Iorestry are much in the news these days. More and more [he public is looking over the forester’s or the landowner’s shoulder and asking, "What is gi?ing on here?" Indeed, what-to-do-about-our-forests is such a newsworthy topic that there is an increasing need for a clear understanding of what foieslry really is. The essence of forestry-the art and science of grow- ing foresls-is called silviculture. And that is what this booklel is all about. Of course, there is mere to forestry than silviculture, but understanding the basic silvicultural options available for treating a forest is a first big step in exploring the entire range of foreslry. In its broadesl sense, forestry includes economic, social, and phil- osophical as well as biological considerations; silviculture deals primarily with the biological aspects of growing trees. Oespite its recent emergences as a national "issue’,’ forestry-and mere specifically, silviculture-is not a new invention. It has been known and practiced in Europe for hundreds of years and in Ibis country for nearly a century. A brief treatment of a complex subiect must, of course, generalize and simplify, and that is what we have done in the following pages. We are more concerned here with Ihe principles of silviculture than wilh specific applica- tions. The discussion should help the reader to better un- derstand what he reads and hears about forestry, and sees for himself in the woods. He will also learn Io use some of the terms defined and-more importantly per- haps-know when they are being misused.
    [Show full text]
  • Silviculture Art & Science of Establishing & Tending Trees & Forests
    Silviculture Art & science of establishing & tending trees & forests Karen Bennett, [email protected] Extension Forestry Professor & Specialist Presented to NH Coverts, May 2017 The Purpose of Silviculture Smith, Larson, Kelty and Ashton. Chapter 1 In silviculture, natural • Control stand structure & process processes are • Control stand composition deliberately guided to • Control stand density produce forests that • Restock unproductive areas are more useful than • Protection & reduction of losses those of nature, and to • Control rotation length do so in less time. • Facilitating harvest • Conservation of site productivity 1 Silviculture Actions Have Two Broad Outcomes • Grow the trees that are already present – tending • Start new trees – regenerating • In practice, often accomplish both outcomes at once • Most common actions- cut trees or leave trees Harvesting is the most common tool for conducting silviculture 2 Forest Management/ Forest Stewardship Interaction of silviculture, ecology, landowner objectives, multiple resources, economics, marketing, regulation, societies’ needs and a landowner’s interests and time. – Markets, plans, laws, harvesting, equipment, landowner, logger, forester, neighbors, trails, access Silviculture is the set of site specific tools used in forest management – weeding, thinning, pruning, improving, harvesting, regenerating, uneven-aged, even-aged, selection, shelterwood, clearcut Hallmarks of Good Forest Stewardship/ Management • Considers multiple resources • Based on landowner objectives • Uses best available practices • Practices based on a plan • Looks long term • Uses professionals • Uses best available science- SILVICULTURE 3 The Forest Management Triangle For Success Landowner Logger Forester Silviculture can be used to create and maintain the kind of forest meets landowner objectives Can be single or multiple objectives 4 Grow big trees for beauty, wildlife, and timber for money to send the kids to college.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRE and SILVICULTURE RECENT ADVANCES in the SILVICULTURAL USE of Prescrffied FIRE
    FIRE AND SILVICULTURE RECENT ADVANCES IN THE SILVICULTURAL USE OF PRESCRffiED FIRE David H. Van Lear School of Natural Resources, Department of Forest Resources, 261 Lehotsky Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 ABSTRACT Although the silvicultural use of prescribed fire has been researched for almost 70 years, new advances are still being made. These advances are primarily the result of (1) a better understanding of fire as an ecological process and (2) the use of this knowledge to restore declining ecosystems, save threatened and endangered species, enhance natural beauty, and regulate composition and structure of plant communities. The role of growing-season fires, avoided in the past century, in shaping the composition and structure of longleaf pine (Pinus paiustris) ecosystems has recently been established. Silvicultural prescriptions for using prescribed fire to benefit oak (Quercus spp.) regeneration on good sites have been developed. Prescribed fire is being used to restore the historical character and health of ponderosa pine (P. ponderosa) ecosystems in the southwestern United States and to regenerate Table Mountain (P. pungens) and pitch pine (P. rigida) ecosystems in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Guidelines also have been developed for using prescribed fire to thin dense natural stands of loblolly pine (P. taeda). Ongoing research continues to identify new uses of prescribed fire to enable ecosystem management to become a more fully implemented paradigm in the twenty-first century. keywords: biodiversity, ecosystem restoration, oak regeneration, prescribed burning, thinning. Citation: Van Lear, D.H. 2000. Recent advances in the silvicultural use of prescribed fire. Pages 183-189 in W. Keith Moser and Cynthia F.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Silviculture
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Syllabi Course Syllabi Fall 9-1-2001 FOR 447.01: Advanced Silviculture John Goodburn University of Montana - Missoula, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Goodburn, John, "FOR 447.01: Advanced Silviculture" (2001). Syllabi. 6299. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/syllabi/6299 This Syllabus is brought to you for free and open access by the Course Syllabi at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syllabi by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FORESTRY 447 ADVANCED SILVICULTURE Autumn 2001 Instructor: John Goodburn Office: Rm. 464 Science Complex Telephone: 243-4295 Email: [email protected] Office hours: Mon. 1:00-2:30 pm, Tues. 9:30-11:00 am, Wed. 11:00 – 12:00 (or by advance appointment) Lecture and Discussion Tues. & Thurs. 8:10 -9:00 a.m. Journalism 306 Lab/Field Work Tues. 1:30 - 5:30 p.m. TBA (Field labs will meet at vans in parking lot south of Science Complex building) Course Description This course will examine a range of silvicultural topics at an advanced level. We will consider silvicultural systems, thinning/stand density concepts, regeneration practices, stand assessment, and stand prescriptions. We will study silviculture of various forest regions in the United States. Silviculture is the theory and practice of influencing forest regeneration, species composition, and growth to accomplish a specified set of resource objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shelterwood Silvicultural System in British Columbia – a Practitioner's
    Extension Note DAY, KOOT, AND WIENSCZYK BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management The shelterwood silvicultural system in British Columbia – A practitioner’s guide. Part 1: Implementation considerations Ken Day1, Cathy Koot2, and Alan Wiensczyk3 Abstract The shelterwood silvicultural system is not yet widely applied in British Columbia. However, it can be used to achieve particular forest land-use objectives, grow higher-value products, and incur lower silviculture costs when natural regeneration is secured. The first in a series of three extension notes guiding practitioners in the use of this system, Part 1 presents advantages and risks of the system. As well, it examines considerations related to forest health, natural disturbance, and administration that must be addressed before implementation of the system. Research results and practitioners’ experiences suggest that although there are risks and administrative hurdles associated with partial cutting (including shelterwoods), the risks are manageable and the use of partial cutting results in significant benefits, especially on area-based tenures and private land. keywords: administrative issues; forest health; ice damage; implementation; risks/benefits; shelterwood silvicultural system; snow damage; windthrow. Contact Information 1 Manager, University of British Columbia Alex Fraser Research Forest, 72 South 7th Avenue, Williams Lake, BC V2G 4N5. Email: [email protected] 2 Research Co-ordinator, University of British Columbia Alex Fraser Research Forest, 72 South 7th Avenue, Williams Lake, BC V2G 4N5. Email: [email protected] 3 Extension Specialist, Ecosystems and Stand Management, FORREX Forum for Research and Extension in Natural Resources, c/o Council of Forest Industries, 400–1488 4th Avenue, Prince George, BC V2L 4Y2.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestlandsteward Summer 2011
    CALIFORNIA FOREST STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM ForestlandSteward SUMMER 2011 Silviculture: the science & the art Silviculture is at the very heart of forest services: “Silvicultural practice consists of the Inside management. The name comes from silva various treatments that may be applied to forest (forest) and culture (to grow). It is the branch stands to maintain and enhance their utility for 2 Silviculture of forestry concerned with the cultivation, or any purpose” (Smith 1989) and “Silviculture 101 management, of the forest. also ensures the long-term continuity of Silviculture is an intricate combination of essential ecologic functions, and the health and 5 It Starts With science and art, merging such disciplines as tree productivity of forested ecosystems” (Nyland Your Vision biology, forest ecology, site dynamics, economics, 2002). 6 The Art of and technology with creativity, intuition, and While silvicultural goals may have changed, Marking even some prophecy. A lot of experience and the techniques remain largely the same: cutting, good powers of observation are also required. thinning, planting, burning. However, these 7 Example: The practice of silviculture has changed quite same basic tools and techniques can lead to very Marking Guidelines a bit over the years. Originally, it was focused different results on the ground. on timber production: “The ultimate goal of all In this issue we try to cover this highly 9 Growing an silvicultural work is to secure on a given area a complex topic in just a handful of pages…it Old Growth high production of valuable material, in order can’t be done. What we can do here is give you Forest that the owner may secure the largest possible a smattering of vocabulary and some general 12 Good News! returns in the long run” (Graves 1911).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Silvicultural System?
    United States Department of Agriculture *This handout was developed from the March 2003 Silvicultural Handbook for British Columbia, British Columbia Ministry of Forests. The BC Ministry of Forests has a tremendous volume of information available on-line that is very applicable to the work we do on Prince of Wales Island. What Is a Silvicultural System? A silvicultural system is a planned program of silvicultural treatments designed to achieve specific stand structure characteristics to meet site objectives during the whole life of a stand. Figure 2.1-1 This program of treatments integrates specific harvesting, regeneration, and stand tending methods to achieve a predictable yield of benefits from the stand over time. Naming the silvicultural system has been based on the principal method of regeneration and desired age structure. Silvicultural systems on most sites have been designed to maximize the production of timber crops. Non- timber objectives, such as watershed health and wildlife production, have been less common. Recently, ecological considerations and resource objectives have increased. A silvicultural system generally has the following basic goals: • Provides for the availability of many forest resources (not just timber) through spatial and temporal distribution. • Produces planned harvests of forest products over the long term. • Accommodates biological/ecological and economic concerns to ensure sustainability of resources. • Provides for regeneration and planned seral stage development. • Effectively uses growing space and productivity to produce desired goods, services, and conditions. Forest Service R10, Tongass NF December, 2016 United States Department of Agriculture • Meets the landscape- and stand-level goals and objectives of the landowner (including allowing for a variety of future management options).
    [Show full text]
  • Silviculture Art & Science of Establishing & Tending Trees & Forests
    Silviculture Art & science of establishing & tending trees & forests Karen Bennett, Extension Forestry Professor & Specialist Presented to NH Coverts, September 2010 Silviculture Actions Have Two Broad Outcomes • Grow the trees that are already present –tending • Start new trees – regenerate • In practice, often accomplish both outcomes at once • Most common actions- cut trees or leave trees 1 Forest Management/ Forest Stewardship Interaction of silviculture, ecology, landowner objectives, multiple resources, economics, marketing, regulation, societies’ needs and interests and time. – Markets, plans, laws, harvesting, equipment, landowner, logger, forester, neighbors, trails, access Silviculture is the set of site specific tools used in forest management – weeding, thinning, pruning, improving, harvesting, regenerating, uneven age, even age, selection, shelterwood, clearcut The Forest Management Triangle For Success Landowner Logger Forester 2 Hallmarks of Good Forest Stewardship/ Management • Considers multiple resources • Based on landowner objectives • Uses best available practices • Practices based on a plan • Looks long term • Uses professionals • Uses best available science- SILVICULTURE Commercial timber harvesting is the most common tool for managing forested habitats Commercial timber harvesting: Trees are cut (“harvested”) and sold as lumber, pulp, biomass, firewood Ability of landowners to manage forested habitats is largely dependent on their ability to sell forest products from their land! Timber harvesting can alter Though
    [Show full text]
  • FOREST MANAGEMENT 101 a Handbook to Forest Management in the North Central Region
    FOREST MANAGEMENT 101 A handbook to forest management in the North Central Region This guide is also available online at: http://ncrs.fs.fed.us/fmg/nfgm A cooperative project of: North Central Research Station Northeastern Area State & Private Forestry Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota Silviculture 21 Silviculture Silviculture The key to effective forest management planning is determining a silvicultural system. A silvicultural system is the collection of treatments to be applied over the life of a stand. These systems are typically described by the method of harvest and regeneration employed. In general these systems are: Clearcutting - The entire stand is cut at one time and naturally or artificially regenerate. Clearcutting Seed-tree - Like clearcutting, but with some larger or mature trees left to provide seed for establishing a new stand. Seed trees may be removed at a later date. Seed-tree 22 Silviculture Shelterwood - Partial harvesting that allows new stems to grow up under an overstory of maturing trees. The shelterwood may be removed at a later date (e.g., 5 to 10 years). Shelterwood Selection - Individual or groups of trees are harvested to make space for natural regeneration. Single tree selection 23 Silviculture Group tree selection Clearcutting, seed-tree, and shelterwood systems produce forests of primarily one age class (assuming seed trees and shelterwood trees are eventually removed) and are commonly referred to as even-aged management. Selection systems produce forests of several to many age classes and are commonly referred to as uneven-aged management. However, in reality, the entire silvicultural system may be more complicated and involve a number of silvicultural treatments such as site preparation, weeding and cleaning, pre-commercial thinning, commercial thinning, pruning, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Bulletin No. 25: Silviculture of Southern Bottomland Hardwoods
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Forestry Bulletins No. 1-25, 1957-1972 9-1972 Forestry Bulletin No. 25: Silviculture of Southern Bottomland Hardwoods Laurence C. Walker Stephen F. Austin State University Kenneth G. Watterson Stephen F. Austin State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/forestrybulletins Part of the Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Walker, Laurence C. and Watterson, Kenneth G., "Forestry Bulletin No. 25: Silviculture of Southern Bottomland Hardwoods" (1972). Forestry Bulletins No. 1-25, 1957-1972. 22. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/forestrybulletins/22 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Forestry Bulletins No. 1-25, 1957-1972 by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRICE $2.00 BULLETIN 25 SEPTEMBER 1972 SILVICULTURE OF SOUTHERN BOTTOMLAND HARDWOODS Laurence C. Walker Kenneth G. Wa"erston (Seventh of a Series an the Silviculture of Southern Forests) Sponsored by the Conservation Foundation School of Forestry STEPHEN F. AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY Nacogdoches, Texas l I Drought.. .. .. ...... .. .. 41 I Oaks ..................................•...•...•...•......42 Vigor Classes 42 I Site Index ...................•..........................42 Natural Regeneration 46 Artificial Regeneration ........................•...•......47 Planting ...................•.........................47
    [Show full text]