Lithuanian Parliamentary Elections 2020: Notable Narratives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lithuanian Parliamentary Elections 2020: Notable Narratives This publication was supported by the National Endowment for Democracy under a project coordinated by GLOBSEC, Bratislava-based think tank. LITHUANIAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2020: NOTABLE NARRATIVES In preparing this review, online comments on social media and on comment sections on news portals were examined from approximately a week before to a week after the first round of parliamentary elections in Lithuania. This study also incorporated news articles from a variety of outlets over the same time period but also extending farther back to capture relevant contextual information. Five particularly dubious portals, some of them arguably outright propaganda/disinformation outlets, deemed prominent, moreover, were ins- pected. Additional sources to those mentioned above were also consulted but less extensively. Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic and the considerable fi- nancial difficulties that have ensued in its wake, the Lithuanian elections proceeded rather peacefully on the information front, with the Homeland Union – Lithuanian Christian Democrats (TS-LKD, Conservatives) taking the largest number of seats. The TS-LKD subsequently launched coalition negotiations with two liberal parties – the Liberal Movement and the Fre- edom Party, with both of these performing above the expectations set by pre-election opinion polling. Narratives perpetuated by problematic sources continued to follow rather familiar lines of thought, geared towards portraying Lithuania as a country that is Russophobic and brainwashed by the West and/or corporate inte- LITHUANIAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2020: NOTABLE NARRATIVES 2 rests. Their purpose – to undermine the motion of drug and alcohol abuse to the legitimacy of the country’s democratic loss of cultural identity to the proliferati- system and the elections themselves. on of various “antitheses” to traditional Discussed in detail in the next section, culture like LGBTI rights. While these is- one Sputnik article1, in particular, featu- sues are not exactly new targets for the res a compilation of greatest hits and is various disinformation and propaganda emblematic of all the different core tal- narratives present in the public domain, king points typically employed. they gained newfound attention this election cycle on account of the Free- Beyond these central themes pinpoin- dom Party, which has been particularly ted in the Sputnik article, there are other vocal, among other items, in its advoca- issues to take note of in examining the cy of, for example, LGBTI rights6. These elections from a broader vantage point. issues, representing genuine societal This includes, for example, the matter questions in need of broader discussi- of electoral turnout. It is an unfortunate on and resolution, are often exploited fact that despite some improvements, by problematic groups to galvanize the voter turnout remains woefully low in public, typically through hyperbolised Lithuania, with 47% of eligible voters depictions. Perceptions of the LGBTI casting ballots in the first round of the community and its rights are illustra- elections and second round turnout tive in this regard, with a study from tumbling all the way down to 39% (the earlier this year finding that a sizeable most passive district posted just 29% segment of society (36%) feels that the turnout).2 This pattern could be tied LGBTI community poses a threat to to vastly negative views in society to- their identity and values.7 wards political parties3, with there being a strong sense that it does not matter It is particularly curious to note how the who is in power. The sentiment that political landscape in Lithuania appears “they are all thieves/incompetents any- to have changed rather suddenly this 4 way” is indeed rather prevalent. election cycle. The country has seen a The turnout angle also plays into other swath of veteran politicians from across “traditional” narratives like the notion the political spectrum fail in their bids that the country’s citizens have emigra- to be returned to parliament, including ted en masse, with those that remain former Prime Minister Kirkilas, incum- being either “indoctrinated” or simply bent Minister of Foreign Affairs Linas incompetent, not to mention being Linkevičius and dozens of others. It is oppressed by “leftist” elites who are notable though that many of the most selling out the country to figures like prominent figures not re-elected come George Soros.5 from parties that identify with the po- litical left. With the elections being nominally (and fully once/if coalition “Leftism” negotiations complete) won by parties identifying as right wing, in fact, the “left “Leftism” was perhaps the most pro- wing” finds itself in the opposition. minent storyline when it came to the elections, blamed for various perceived This is where the concept of “leftists”, wrongs in society, ranging from the pro- as presented by disinformation and LITHUANIAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2020: NOTABLE NARRATIVES 3 propaganda outlets, clashes with how edom Party being arguably more asser- the parties are arranged in reality, with tive in regards to some topics including there being very few parties that outri- LGBTI rights and the decriminalisation ght espouse solely left- or right-wing of light narcotic substances. ideological thought. The liberal parties The success of the two liberal parties (and to a lesser extent even the Conser- is indicative of the fact that disinfor- vatives) might be described as “leftists” mation and propaganda might not have by some of the more dubious commen- been able to adjust swiftly enough this tators. This approach, however, relies election cycle (plausible in light of the on merely cherry picking one aspect of fact that the usual suspects are like- their policies (primarily social and cul- ly currently focused on other matters tural policy). The majority of parties in including Khabarovsk, Belarus and Lithuania, nonetheless, operate on the COVID-19). While the propaganda and basis of hybrid models meaning that disinformation narratives8 eventually although they might be socially and/ primarily ramped up against “leftism” or morally conservative, they could be with the seeming intention of evoking fiscally liberal or vice versa. The parties a sense of dread among those opposed attracting the most support, meanwhi- to LGBTI rights and the legalisation of le, are rather centrist with some left- or cannabis, the strategy appears not to right-wing bent. Consequently, unsur- have been especially successful. Poli- prisingly, we find that the concept of tical parties that are either proponents “leftism” is rather used as an umbrella of LGBTI rights or not overly inclined term and rallying cry to evoke image- against, in fact, made significant gains ry of unbridled anarchy and hedonism in both rounds. than as a coherent argument. The new coalition, meanwhile, is taking over the reins of government in a chal- Conservative-Liberal coalition lenging climate, with a second wave of the pandemic stirring. This backdrop back for another crisis presents certain parallels to the last The government will be formed now by time the Conservatives formed a go- a coalition led by, following two terms vernment (one also previously suppor- in opposition, the Conservatives and ted by the liberals), back in 2008, ri- spearheaded by three female leaders. ght on the cusp of the global financial This includes Ingrida Šimonytė, who is crisis. During the election campaign, due to become the second female pri- there were indeed some political moves me minister of Lithuania and the first advanced to instil fear that a Conserva- since Kazimiera Prunskienė served as tive government would lead to a return prime minister following the country’s of austerity. Corresponding to memo- independence from the Soviet Union. ries of the 2008-2009 global financial Alongside the Conservatives, the coali- crisis, these spending cuts, if enacted, tion will include the Liberal Movement would presumably prove incredibly and the Freedom Party, two parties that painful and vastly unpopular across advocate for liberal values, with the Fre- the social spectrum. This talking point LITHUANIAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2020: NOTABLE NARRATIVES 4 especially made use of a comment from prioritization of tasks rather than the former Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius, distribution of political positions. There who led the Conservative government are, nonetheless, challenges still yet to of 2008-2012, that budgeting decisions overcome. While the Homeland Union under the incumbent coalition and the has endured criticism from conservati- pandemic could lead to a “painful han- ve pundits and politicians for a suppo- gover” and the need to tighten belts sed overly liberal turn, the party’s lea- next year.9 nings, in fact, still tilt in a conservative direction with respect to its social and This jostling may, however, have had moral agenda. This orientation stands only a limited impact given that the in contrast to the liberal parties, mean- Conservatives still managed to obtain while, with the Freedom Party pledging 50 parliamentary seats of a 141 total up that it will push for the legalisation of for grabs, a solid performance in a coun- same-sex partnerships and the decrimi- try where political parties are generally nalisation of light narcotic substances unpopular. This general lack of politi- within 100 days of the start of term. cal party popularity in Lithuania might The parties also hold different econo- have, in fact, aided the Conservatives,
Recommended publications
  • Democratic Change and Crime Control in Lithuania: Compiling New Criminological Discourses
    Democratic Change and Crime Control in Lithuania: Compiling New Criminological Discourses Dr. Aleksandras DOBRYNINAS (Vilnius, Lithuania - 1996) Introduction I. Political Change and Crime in Lithuania II. Theoretical Reflection on Crime and Criminality III. Crime, General Public and Mass Media IV. Political Rhetoric on Crime Conclusions Bibliography Introduction Lithuania belongs to the so called post-communist part of the world and shares with its neighbors all spectrum of problems that characterize the transition from authoritarian state to new, probably, democratic one. This transition has its logic and its stages that hardly possible to bypass. Lithuania as many other countries of Central and East Europe has faced paradoxical problem: how to implement Western democratic ideas in society that still experiences strong influence of previous anti-democratic institutional structure. There were a lot of illusions about liberal and democratic prospects for future development in the beginning of 'velvet ('singing' in Lithuanian case) revolution'. However there was a deep gap between noble idealistic thinking and crude social and political reality. B. Ackermann, who in 1992 noted sensitiveness of Eastern Europeans to liberal democratic ideas, wrote that "it is one thing, (...), to affirm the enduring significance of freedom and the rule of law," and "quite another to translate these values into enduring political structured" (1; p. 67-68). Unfortunately, he was right. Recent elections in Lithuania, Latvia, Hungary, Poland and other East European countries showed that previous communist nomenclature was able to adapt itself to new political conditions and to restore its control under societies using more soft, civilized methods of governing. Today European intellectuals prefer to speak rather of 'velvet restoration' (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuania by Vaidotas A
    Lithuania by Vaidotas A. Vaicˇaitis This monograph is up-to-date as of MONTH YEAR 2020 Constitutional Law – Suppl. 149 (2020) Lithuania – 1 Published by: Kluwer Law International B.V. PO Box 316 2400 AH Alphen aan den Rijn The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Website: lrus.wolterskluwer.com Sold and distributed in North, Central and South America by: Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory U.S. 7201 McKinney Circle Frederick, MD 21704 United States of America Email: [email protected] Sold and distributed in all other countries by: Air Business Subscriptions Rockwood House Haywards Heath West Sussex RH16 3DH United Kingdom Email: [email protected] The monograph Lithuania is an integral part of Constitutional Law in the International Encyclopaedia of Laws series. Printed on acid-free paper. ISBN 978-90-654-4944-3 Constitutional Law was first published in 1992. Vaicˇaitis, Vaidotas A. ‘Lithuania’. In International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Constitutional Law, edited by André Alen & David Haljan. Alphen aan den Rijn, NL: Kluwer Law International, 2020. This title is available on www.kluwerlawonline.com © 2020, Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher. Permission to use this content must be obtained from the copyright owner. More information can be found at: lrus.wolterskluwer.com/policies/permissions-reprints-and-licensing Printed in the United Kingdom. 2 – Lithuania Constitutional Law – Suppl. 149 (2020) The Author Vaidotas A.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL ELECTIONS in LITHUANIA 14Th and 28Th October 2012
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN LITHUANIA 14th and 28th October 2012 European Elections monitor The leftwing opposition running favourite in the general elections in Lithuania Corinne Deloy Translated by Helen Levy On 14th October next 2.5 million Lithuanians will be electing the 141 MPs who sit in the Seimas, the only chamber in parliament. They will also be voting by referendum on the building of a new nuclear power station in Visaginas (in the country’s north east). The second round of the general election will take place on 28th October. Analysis The general election date has to be set and announced by presidential decision at least six months before the end of the previous legislature. On 11th April last, Lithuanian President, Dalia Grybauskaite announced the dates of the next election. The campaign started immediately after this announcement with the official campaign beginning on 14th September. 2 000 candidates (+ 400 in comparison with the previous elections on 12th and 26th October 2008) from 27 of the country’s 44 political parties (including six new ones), are running in this election. The situation in Lithuania The two heads of the Lithuanian executive have implemented a severe policy to consolidate public The country has been governed by the right for the finances. At present the country is experiencing the past four years. The government comprises the Ho- highest growth rate in the EU (3% forecast in 2012 meland Union – Lithuanian Christian Democrats (TS- after 6% last year). Its public deficit is due to drop LK), led by Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius, the Liberal below the 3% of the GDP this year and its debt lies and Centre Union (LLC-LSC) led by Gintautas Babravi- at 38.5% (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Successful New Parties in the Baltic States: Similar Or Different?
    Successful new parties in the Baltic states: similar or different? Paper prepared for the conference ‘The Baltic States: New Europe or Old?’ University of Glasgow, 22-23 January 2004 Allan Sikk Department of Political Science University of Tartu Ülikooli 18, Tartu 50090 Estonia [email protected] http://www.ut.ee/SOPL/cv/sikke.htm Tel +372 7 375 668 Fax +372 7 375 154 DRAFT VERSION – PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE WITHOUT PERMISSION Introduction Last elections in the Baltic states witnessed a rise of strong and significant new parties. In October 2000 parliamentary elections in Lithuania, the New Union – Social Liberals (Naujoji Sąjunga – Socialliberalai) led by Artūras Paulauskas, was supported by 19.6% of the electorate in the proportional representation part thereby coming second after the Algirdas Brazauskas’ Social-Democratic Coalition. It gained 28 seats, being the third largest group in the Seimas as the Liberal Union was more successful in the single mandate constituencies. Nevertheless, the New Union was an equal partner in the governing coalition, Paulauskas becoming the chairman of the parliament. Furthermore, it has been in the Lithuanian cabinet ever since, while the Liberal Union was forced to leave after only eight months in office and was replaced by the Social Democrats. Two years later, in October 2002 Saeima elections, the New Era (Jaunais Laiks) surfaced becoming the most popular party in Latvia. It won 24% of the votes and 26 seats in the 100-strong parliament. Despite being in a difficult position concerning finding appropriate coalition partners, the New Era leader Einars Repse succeeded in putting together a government rather swiftly (in less than three weeks, Ikstens 2002) and becoming the prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL ELECTION in LITHUANIA 9Th October 2016
    GENERAL ELECTION IN LITHUANIA 9th October 2016 European Elections monitor The Social Democratic Party of outgoing Prime Minister Algirdas Butkevicius may arrive ahead in the Lithuanian general elections. Corinne Deloy On 9th April last the President of the Republic of Republic (2003-2004) and presently led by MEP Lithuania Dalia Grybauskaite set the dates for the Rolandas Paksas, is due to win over the vital 5% next general elections for 9th and 23rd October threshold in order to enter parliament, with 5.1%. Analysis next. The publication of the decree heralded the start of the electoral campaign. The political parties running The Social Democrats might retain the majority. 1,461 people on 14 lists (and from 16 political They have governed Lithuania for the last four parties), 31.7% of whom are women, are years in coalition with the Labour Party and For running in this election. 10 people are running as Order and Justice. Electoral Action for Lithuanian independents. Poles (LLRA), which represents the country’s Polish minority (around 7% of the population) took part The elections should lead to the formation of a in government from 2012 to 2014. Four years after government comprising several political parties. their victory the Social Democrats still lead in terms Since the general elections on 10th and 28th of voting intentions even though they suffered at October 2004 no political party in Lithuania has the start of the year due to a corruption scandal won more than 20% of the vote, and coalitions of over construction work in protected areas near three or four parties have become a tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Voting in Post-Communist Eastern Europe Is to Analyze How Individual-Level Factors Affect Vote Choice from a Cross-National Perspective
    CSD Center for the Study of Democracy An Organized Research Unit University of California, Irvine www.democ.uci.edu Between 1992 and 1994 a puzzling phenomenon manifested itself in four newly democratized states of Eastern Europe: political parties directly descendant of Soviet-era communist parties achieved parliamentary victories in Lithuania, Poland, Hungary, and Bulgaria. In less than five years of democratic government, the citizens of these countries had become largely disillusioned with the myriad parties which had arisen in opposition to communism. 2 The relatively peaceful transitions in Eastern Europe permitted the formerly monolithic communist parties to continue playing significant roles in many of these new political regimes. Following internal restructuring, these ex-communist parties, with their established material, networking, and organizational resources, presented themselves as credible democratic alternatives to the major opposition parties associated with the transition to democracy and free-market capitalism. In Lithuania, Hungary, and Bulgaria, ex-communist parties acquired sufficient votes to obtain manufactured parliamentary majorities, 3 while in Poland, the ex-communist Democratic Left Alliance (SLD) formed a coalition with two other parties to capture nearly three-quarters of the seats in the Polish Sejm. The behavior of voters in these four countries might be interpreted as a manifestation of nostalgia for the securities associated with the communist past: a time when street crime, unemployment, and unaffordable housing were practically non- existent. Yet, it would be misguided to suppose that electoral support for ex-communist parties equated to a desire for the return of the communist political regime. As Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan explain: .
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Lithuania Country Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators
    Lithuania Report Vitalis Nakrosis, Ramunas Vilpisauskas, Detlef Jahn (Coordinator) m o c . a i l o t o F – Sustainable Governance g i n n a v Indicators 2016 o j © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2016 | 2 Lithuania Report Executive Summary Formal democracy is well developed in Lithuania. Participation rights, electoral competition and the rule of law are generally respected by the Lithuanian authorities. However, substantive democracy suffers from a few weaknesses. Despite some recent improvements, party financing is not sufficiently monitored or audited, and campaign-financing fraud is not subject to adequate enforcement. In addition, discrimination continues to be evident, sometimes significantly so. Most importantly, corruption is not sufficiently contained in Lithuania. Anti-corruption legislation is well developed, but the public sector continues to offer opportunities for abuses of power or position, and the enforcement of anti-corruption laws remains insufficient. Lithuanian policymakers have sought to establish and maintain social, economic and environmental conditions promoting their citizens’ well-being. However, the country’s policy performance remains mixed, with social-policy results lagging behind those of economic and environmental policies. Some observers attribute this to transition and EU-integration processes that have focused on primarily political, economic and administrative matters. The country’s formal governance arrangements are quite well designed. However, these arrangements do not always function to their full potential. There are significant gaps in policy implementation and in practical use of the impact- assessment process for most important policy decisions, and societal consultation remains underdeveloped. There were a few important developments in the 2014 – 2015 period. In 2015, the country’s first direct mayoral election were held successfully.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii Geography 2.1 - 2.2
    LITHUANIA ASSESSMENT April 2000 Country Information and Policy Unit CONTENTS I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 - 1.5 II GEOGRAPHY 2.1 - 2.2 III HISTORY Recent Political History 3.1 - 3.4 Economic History 3.5 - 3.7 Parliamentary Elections 1996 3.8 - 3.9 IV INSTRUMENTS OF THE STATE Lithuanian Government 4.1 - 4.3 Political Organisations 4.4 - 4.16 Lithuanian Constitution 4.17- 4.18 Rights of Citizens to Change their Government 4.19 –4.21 The Security Services 4.22 – 4.31 Legal Rights/Detentions 4.32 – 4.38 Prisons 4.39 – 4.42 The Judicial System 4.43 – 4.53 The Penal Code 4.54 – 4.56 The Death Penalty 4.57 – 4.58 Citizenship 4.59 – 4.63 Social Welfare 4.64 – 4.65 Education 4.66 Europe and NATO 4.67 – 4.71 V HUMAN RIGHTS A: HUMAN RIGHTS: GENERAL ASSESSMENT Actual Practice with Regard to Human Rights 5.1 – 5.10 Women 5.11 – 5.14 Children 5.15 – 5.18 People with Disabilities 5.19 – 5.21 Religious Freedom 5.22 – 5.30 Ethnic Minorities 5.31 – 5.37 Jews 5.38 – 5.44 Poles 5.45 – 5.49 Russians 5.50 – 5.56 Roma 5.57 Refugees 5.58 – 5.66 Homosexuals 5.67 – 5.72 B: HUMAN RIGHTS: OTHER ISSUES Freedom of Speech 6.1 – 6.7 Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association 6.8 – 6.10 Workers’ Rights 6.11 – 6.18 Freedom of Movement 6.19 – 6.20 Military Service 6.21 – 6.26 Rehabilitation and Genocide Trials 6.27 – 6.28 Organised Crime 6.29 – 6.41 ANNEX A: CURRENT GOVERNMENT ANNEX B: ELECTIONS ANNEX C: POLITICAL PARTIES ANNEX D: CHRONOLOGY OF KEY EVENTS BIBLIOGRAPHY SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information & Policy Unit, Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish Minority in Lithuania
    a n F P 7 - SSH collaborative research project [2008 - 2 0 1 1 ] w w w . e n r i - e a s t . n e t Interplay of European, National and Regional Identities: Nations between States along the New Eastern Borders of the European Union Series of project research reports Contextual and empirical reports on ethnic minorities in Central and Eastern Europe Belarus Research Report #8 Germany The Polish Minority Hungary in Lithuania Latvia Authors: Arvydas Matulionis | Vida Beresnevičiūtė Lithuania Tadas Leončikas | Monika Frėjutė-Rakauskienė Kristina Šliavaitė | Irena Šutinienė Poland Viktorija Žilinskaitė | Hans-Georg Heinrich Russia Olga Alekseeva Slovakia Series Editors: Ukraine Hans-Georg Heinrich | Alexander Chvorostov Project primarily funded under FP7-SSH programme Project host and coordinator EUROPEAN COMMISSION www.ihs.ac.at European Research Area 2 ENRI - E a s t R es e a r c h Report #8: The Polish Minority in Lithuania About the ENRI-East research project (www.enri-east.net) The Interplay of European, National and Regional Identities: Nations between states along the new eastern borders of the European Union (ENRI-East) ENRI-East is a research project implemented in 2008-2011 and primarily funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Program. This international and inter-disciplinary study is aimed at a deeper understanding of the ways in which the modern European identities and regional cultures are formed and inter-communicated in the Eastern part of the European continent. ENRI-East is a response to the shortcomings of previous research: it is the first large-scale comparative project which uses a sophisticated toolkit of various empirical methods and is based on a process-oriented theoretical approach which places empirical research into a broader historical framework.
    [Show full text]
  • General Elections in Lithuania on 11 and 25 October
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN LITHUANIA 11-25TH OCTOBER 2020 European The Farmers and Greens Party Elections monitor (LVZS), led by outgoing Prime Corinne Deloy Minister Saulius Skvernelis, could remain in office after the general election in Lithuania ANALYSIS At the beginning of April, while Lithuanians were in Political observers expect little change in the voting on lockdown the President of the Republic Gitanas Nauseda October 11 and 25. They anticipate that negotiations announced that his fellow-citizens would be called to over a future governing coalition will be lengthy. It could ballot on October 11 and 25 to renew the 141 elected also be unstable. MPs of the Seimas, the only house of parliament. 22 According to the latest opinion poll conducted by the political parties are competing in these parliamentary Spinter Tyrimai Institute, the Homeland Union-Christian elections, 332 people, including 282 affiliated to a Democrats (TS-LKD), the main opposition party led by party and 38 who are running as independents, are Gabrielius Landsbergis, is due to come out ahead with candidates. 21.7% of the vote. It is expected to be followed by the Farmers and Greens Party with 19.4%, the Social Lithuania is governed by a coalition government led by Democratic Party with 12.6%, and the Labour Party Prime Minister Saulius Skvernelis, which includes the with 8.6%, followed by the Freedom Party (Laisves), a LVZS and the Social Democratic Labour Party (LSDDP) social-liberal party led by Ausrinė Armonaite with 6.8% of Gediminas Kirkilas. The government is supported and the Liberal Movement (LRLS) of Eugenijus Gentvilas by “Welfare Lithuania” and the Electoral Action for with 5.9%.
    [Show full text]
  • The Women's Movement in Lithuania: Discourses and Lobbying Strategies
    “The Women’s Movement in Lithuania: Discourses and Lobbying Strategies” Meilute Taljunaite Institute for Social Research Lithuania A paper presented at the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA)/CEE Network for Gender Issues Conference The Implementation of Quotas: European Experiences Budapest, Hungary, 22–23 October 2004 Introduction Like other countries in Europe, the participation of women in politics in Lithuania has ebbed and flowed. In Soviet times, more than 35 percent of all deputies in the former Supreme Soviet of the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic (SSR) were women. However, this institution had no real power and there were very few women in other administrative structures like the supreme bodies of the Communist Party or the Council of Ministers. Like many other countries in the former Soviet block, women’s representation dropped in the first post-communist multi-party elections. In Lithuania, quotas were partially lifted in the 1989 parliamentary elections, and consequently, the proportion of women deputies fell from 36 percent (in 1984) to 16 percent in 1990. Since then, women’s representation has continued to climb, with 21 percent female members of parliament in 2004. This case study examines the political participation of women, gender quotas and the women’s movement. The Electoral System The first democratic parliamentary elections, in 1990, employed electoral rules inherited from the Soviet era, that is, the majority/plurality formula, combined with an element of competition achieved through the liberalization of nomination procedures. Political organizations, social movements and community entities had the right to nominate electoral candidates; the number of candidates was unlimited.
    [Show full text]
  • Poles in Lithuania Demographics
    NATIONAL COMMUNITIES IN LITHUANIA FACTS NUMBERS ACTIVITIES POLES IN LITHUANIA DEMOGRAPHICS Poles are the largest national minority in Lithuania. According to the data gathered during the National Population and Housing Census in 2011, there are 200 thousand Polish nationals, which represents 6.6% of the en- tire population (overall there are 2 814 696 inhabitants). If one compares the largest cities in Lithuania, the Polish minority in each city is as follows: Vilnius – over 88 thousand; Kaunas – approximately 1136; Klaipėda – 540; Šiauliai – 160; Panevėžys – 180. In some municipalities, the Polish minority forms the majority of residents. These are: the municipality of Šalčininkai district (77.8%), the Vilnius dis- trict municipality (52.1%), the Trakai district municipality (30.1%) and the Švenčionys district municipality (26%). The highest number of Polish mi- nority representatives can be found in the following cities: Šalčininkai Polish nationality/ County % overall number of population ALYTUS COUNTY 1,92% 3 029 / 157 766 Alytus city municipality 0,64% 384 / 59 964 Alytus district municipality 0,71% 201 / 28 167 Druskininkai district municipality 3,46% 755 / 21 803 Lazdijai district municipality 0,34% 77 / 22 455 Varėna district municipality 6,35% 1 612 / 25 377 UTENA COUNTY 4,03% 6 126 / 152 004 Anykščiai district municipality 0,34% 97 / 28 668 Ignalina district municipality 7,05% 1 297 / 18 386 Molėtai district municipality 6,34% 1 313 / 20 700 Utena district municipality 0,53% 229 / 43 275 Visaginas municipality 9,33% 2 108 / 22
    [Show full text]