Democratic Change and Crime Control in Lithuania: Compiling New Criminological Discourses
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lithuania by Vaidotas A
Lithuania by Vaidotas A. Vaicˇaitis This monograph is up-to-date as of MONTH YEAR 2020 Constitutional Law – Suppl. 149 (2020) Lithuania – 1 Published by: Kluwer Law International B.V. PO Box 316 2400 AH Alphen aan den Rijn The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Website: lrus.wolterskluwer.com Sold and distributed in North, Central and South America by: Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory U.S. 7201 McKinney Circle Frederick, MD 21704 United States of America Email: [email protected] Sold and distributed in all other countries by: Air Business Subscriptions Rockwood House Haywards Heath West Sussex RH16 3DH United Kingdom Email: [email protected] The monograph Lithuania is an integral part of Constitutional Law in the International Encyclopaedia of Laws series. Printed on acid-free paper. ISBN 978-90-654-4944-3 Constitutional Law was first published in 1992. Vaicˇaitis, Vaidotas A. ‘Lithuania’. In International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Constitutional Law, edited by André Alen & David Haljan. Alphen aan den Rijn, NL: Kluwer Law International, 2020. This title is available on www.kluwerlawonline.com © 2020, Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher. Permission to use this content must be obtained from the copyright owner. More information can be found at: lrus.wolterskluwer.com/policies/permissions-reprints-and-licensing Printed in the United Kingdom. 2 – Lithuania Constitutional Law – Suppl. 149 (2020) The Author Vaidotas A. -
GENERAL ELECTIONS in LITHUANIA 14Th and 28Th October 2012
GENERAL ELECTIONS IN LITHUANIA 14th and 28th October 2012 European Elections monitor The leftwing opposition running favourite in the general elections in Lithuania Corinne Deloy Translated by Helen Levy On 14th October next 2.5 million Lithuanians will be electing the 141 MPs who sit in the Seimas, the only chamber in parliament. They will also be voting by referendum on the building of a new nuclear power station in Visaginas (in the country’s north east). The second round of the general election will take place on 28th October. Analysis The general election date has to be set and announced by presidential decision at least six months before the end of the previous legislature. On 11th April last, Lithuanian President, Dalia Grybauskaite announced the dates of the next election. The campaign started immediately after this announcement with the official campaign beginning on 14th September. 2 000 candidates (+ 400 in comparison with the previous elections on 12th and 26th October 2008) from 27 of the country’s 44 political parties (including six new ones), are running in this election. The situation in Lithuania The two heads of the Lithuanian executive have implemented a severe policy to consolidate public The country has been governed by the right for the finances. At present the country is experiencing the past four years. The government comprises the Ho- highest growth rate in the EU (3% forecast in 2012 meland Union – Lithuanian Christian Democrats (TS- after 6% last year). Its public deficit is due to drop LK), led by Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius, the Liberal below the 3% of the GDP this year and its debt lies and Centre Union (LLC-LSC) led by Gintautas Babravi- at 38.5% (2011). -
From Liberal to Predatory Mass Media in Post-Communist Lithuania
JOURNALISM RESEARCH • Science journal (Communication and information) • 2009 No. 2 From liberal to predatory mass media in post-communist Lithuania Irmina Matonytė Professor ISM University of Management and Economics Arklių g. 18, Vilnius LT-01305, Lithuania [email protected] Referring to the concepts, communicative democracy is defined as free, open and democratic communication organized around three equally legitimate public sphere actors – politicians, journalists and public opinion, and populism is under- stood as good, entertaining and effective communication with people, eroding basic functions of the political parties (institutionalization of ideological con- flicts) and politicians (representation), the paper provides insights about the dan- gers to quality of democracy if the free mass media gets utterly away from political parallelism. Special attention is placed on the tendencies of media personnel to be active in the political life. The paper conceptualizes a tremendous decrease (by one third) in public trust in mass media in Lithuania, observed from 1998 to 2009 and interprets this change as a cumulative result of the post-communist ill- structured political field under pressing liberalization and democratization cou- pled with specific patterns of the Lithuanian political culture and public sphere. In the conditions of a still relatively high public trust in mass-media and scarce foreign ownership of the mass-media outlets in Lithuania, the local media barons are able to produce and impose their own public-agenda. The Lithuanian mass- media and government relations evolve along the lines of the zero-sum game: they seek to control each other, and at the same time try to avoid being controlled by the other, while any other pattern of inter-relations does not appear as viable and appropriate. -
RRTA 714 (18 August 2011)
1102720 [2011] RRTA 714 (18 August 2011) DECISION RECORD RRT CASE NUMBER: 1102720 DIAC REFERENCE(S): CLF2010/174879 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Lithuania TRIBUNAL MEMBER: John Cipolla DATE: 18 August 2011 PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney DECISION: The Tribunal affirms the decisions not to grant the applicants Protection (Class XA) visas. STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of decisions made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship to refuse to grant the applicants Protection (Class XA) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicants, who claim to be citizens of Lithuania, arrived in Australia and applied to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship for the visas on [date deleted under s.431(2) of the Migration Act 1958 as this information may identify the applicants] December 2010. The delegate decided to refuse to grant the visas [in] February 2011 and notified the applicants of the decisions. 3. The delegate refused the visas on the basis that the applicants are not persons to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention. 4. The applicants applied to the Tribunal [in] March 2011 for review of the delegate’s decisions. 5. The Tribunal finds that the delegate’s decisions are RRT-reviewable decisions under s.411(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal finds that the applicants have made a valid application for review under s.412 of the Act. RELEVANT LAW 6. Under s.65(1) a visa may be granted only if the decision maker is satisfied that the prescribed criteria for the visa have been satisfied. -
Successful New Parties in the Baltic States: Similar Or Different?
Successful new parties in the Baltic states: similar or different? Paper prepared for the conference ‘The Baltic States: New Europe or Old?’ University of Glasgow, 22-23 January 2004 Allan Sikk Department of Political Science University of Tartu Ülikooli 18, Tartu 50090 Estonia [email protected] http://www.ut.ee/SOPL/cv/sikke.htm Tel +372 7 375 668 Fax +372 7 375 154 DRAFT VERSION – PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE WITHOUT PERMISSION Introduction Last elections in the Baltic states witnessed a rise of strong and significant new parties. In October 2000 parliamentary elections in Lithuania, the New Union – Social Liberals (Naujoji Sąjunga – Socialliberalai) led by Artūras Paulauskas, was supported by 19.6% of the electorate in the proportional representation part thereby coming second after the Algirdas Brazauskas’ Social-Democratic Coalition. It gained 28 seats, being the third largest group in the Seimas as the Liberal Union was more successful in the single mandate constituencies. Nevertheless, the New Union was an equal partner in the governing coalition, Paulauskas becoming the chairman of the parliament. Furthermore, it has been in the Lithuanian cabinet ever since, while the Liberal Union was forced to leave after only eight months in office and was replaced by the Social Democrats. Two years later, in October 2002 Saeima elections, the New Era (Jaunais Laiks) surfaced becoming the most popular party in Latvia. It won 24% of the votes and 26 seats in the 100-strong parliament. Despite being in a difficult position concerning finding appropriate coalition partners, the New Era leader Einars Repse succeeded in putting together a government rather swiftly (in less than three weeks, Ikstens 2002) and becoming the prime minister. -
Mass Media and the (Multi)Party System in Post-Communist Lithuania Irmina Matonytė EUROPEAN HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY in VILNIUS, LITHUANIA
(Liberal) mass media and the (multi)party system in post-communist Lithuania Irmina Matonytė EUROPEAN HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY IN VILNIUS, LITHUANIA ABSTRACT: Th e aim of this paper is to describe and assess the political parallelism pertinent to the post-communist Lithuanian mass media; and to show potential risk (for democracy, civil society) of the absence of the political parallelism. Referring to the concepts, communicative democracy is defi ned as free, open and democratic communication organized around three equally legitimate public sphere actors – politicians, journalists and public opinion, and populism is understood as good, entertaining and eff ective communication with people, eroding basic functions of the political parties (institution- alization of ideological confl icts) and politicians (representation). Th e paper provides insights about the dangers to quality of democracy which the free mass media might present when it gets utterly away from political parallelism. Special attention is placed on the tendencies of media personnel to be active in the political life. Th e (universal) contemporary mass society phenomenon, coupled with the (post- communist regional) ill-structured of the post-communist political fi eld and (local) specifi c traditions of the Lithuanian political culture and public sphere, gave birth to the peculiar absence of the mass- media and politics parallelism in the country. In the conditions of the relative absence of foreign ownership of the mass-media outlets in Lithuania, the local media barons are able to produce and impose their own public-agenda, which hampers development of the civic-minded public sphere and defi nition of the social and professional responsibilities of the journalism as a profession and as a so- cial category. -
INTERCAFE Meeting Report, Saxony, Germany, October 2005
Final Draft INTERCAFE @ Saxony meeting report – 31 Mar 2006 MEETING REPORT INTERCAFE @ Saxony 01-03 October 2005 “Commercial Carp Aquaculture” INTERCAFE Meeting Report, Saxony, Germany, October 2005 D. N. Carss & M. Marzano (Editors) This full report of the meeting is in six parts: (1) Work Group 1: Ecological databases and analyses; (2) Work Group 2: Conflict management and resolution; (3) Work Group 3: Linking science with policy and best practice, (4) Report on field trip, including Q&A session with local stakeholders, (5) Carp pond sub-group report, (6) Interdisciplinarity – progress report. An example of the datasheet available to input data into the Water Systems Database is given in Appendix 1. PART (1) Work Group One: Ecological databases and analyses Drafted and compiled by Stef van Rijn, Mennobart van Eerden, Jean-Yves Paquet and Stefano Volponi Participants: Ian Russell, Bruno Broughton, Catarina Vinagre, Kareen Seiche, Botond Kiss, Loïc Marion, Szymon Bzoma, Stefano Volponi, Stef van Rijn, Mennobart van Eerden, Josef Trauttmansdorff, Mikael Kilpi, Marijan Govedic, Svein- Håkon Lorentsen, Ivailo Nikolov, Janis Baumanis, Renata Martincova, Michal Adamec, Jean-Yves Paquet. Work Group One primarily undertook four activities during the Saxony meeting and these are described below. (1) Field trip analysis WG1 members spent a considerable amount of time focusing on ecological aspects in relation to cormorant presence in the whole carp pond area. Taking into account basic data on cormorant behaviour and ecological requirements, as -
GENERAL ELECTION in LITHUANIA 9Th October 2016
GENERAL ELECTION IN LITHUANIA 9th October 2016 European Elections monitor The Social Democratic Party of outgoing Prime Minister Algirdas Butkevicius may arrive ahead in the Lithuanian general elections. Corinne Deloy On 9th April last the President of the Republic of Republic (2003-2004) and presently led by MEP Lithuania Dalia Grybauskaite set the dates for the Rolandas Paksas, is due to win over the vital 5% next general elections for 9th and 23rd October threshold in order to enter parliament, with 5.1%. Analysis next. The publication of the decree heralded the start of the electoral campaign. The political parties running The Social Democrats might retain the majority. 1,461 people on 14 lists (and from 16 political They have governed Lithuania for the last four parties), 31.7% of whom are women, are years in coalition with the Labour Party and For running in this election. 10 people are running as Order and Justice. Electoral Action for Lithuanian independents. Poles (LLRA), which represents the country’s Polish minority (around 7% of the population) took part The elections should lead to the formation of a in government from 2012 to 2014. Four years after government comprising several political parties. their victory the Social Democrats still lead in terms Since the general elections on 10th and 28th of voting intentions even though they suffered at October 2004 no political party in Lithuania has the start of the year due to a corruption scandal won more than 20% of the vote, and coalitions of over construction work in protected areas near three or four parties have become a tradition. -
Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review 2004
ISSN 1648-8024 General Jonas Þemaitis Lithuanian Military Academy Institute of International Relations and Political Science of the University of Vilnius STRATEGIC RESEARCH CENTER LITHUANIAN ANNUAL STRATEGIC REVIEW 2004 Vilnius 2005 Editorial Board Raimundas Lopata, Jûratë Novagrockienë, Gediminas Vitkus Reviewers for sections: “Global International System and Lithuania”; “Changing European Security Space” and “Security Issues in Lithuania” Prof. habil. dr. Jonas Èièinskas, Head of the European Studies Department, Insti- tute of International Relations and Political Science, University of Vilnius Dr. Vaidotas Urbelis, Head of the Defence Policy Planning Department of the Ministry of National Defence Reviewers for section “Lithuania’s Eastern Neighbours” Doc. dr. Kæstutis Ðerpetis, Assoc. prof. of the Political Science Department, School of Social Sciences, University of Klaipëda Doc. dr. Vladas Sirutavièius, Assoc. prof. of the Institute of International Relations and Political Science, University of Vilnius Managing Editor: Gediminas Vitkus Assitant to the Editor: Eglë Ðataitë-Drëgvienë Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review 2004, Vilnius: Lithuanian Military Academy, 2005 The main objective of this publication is to provide the readers with a wide-scale analysis and generalization of the changes, essential and significant, for the national security of Lithuania at international–systemic, regional and national levels. The book also aims to give maximum emphasis to the specificity of Lithuanian national security issues and comprehensively -
Economic Voting in Post-Communist Eastern Europe Is to Analyze How Individual-Level Factors Affect Vote Choice from a Cross-National Perspective
CSD Center for the Study of Democracy An Organized Research Unit University of California, Irvine www.democ.uci.edu Between 1992 and 1994 a puzzling phenomenon manifested itself in four newly democratized states of Eastern Europe: political parties directly descendant of Soviet-era communist parties achieved parliamentary victories in Lithuania, Poland, Hungary, and Bulgaria. In less than five years of democratic government, the citizens of these countries had become largely disillusioned with the myriad parties which had arisen in opposition to communism. 2 The relatively peaceful transitions in Eastern Europe permitted the formerly monolithic communist parties to continue playing significant roles in many of these new political regimes. Following internal restructuring, these ex-communist parties, with their established material, networking, and organizational resources, presented themselves as credible democratic alternatives to the major opposition parties associated with the transition to democracy and free-market capitalism. In Lithuania, Hungary, and Bulgaria, ex-communist parties acquired sufficient votes to obtain manufactured parliamentary majorities, 3 while in Poland, the ex-communist Democratic Left Alliance (SLD) formed a coalition with two other parties to capture nearly three-quarters of the seats in the Polish Sejm. The behavior of voters in these four countries might be interpreted as a manifestation of nostalgia for the securities associated with the communist past: a time when street crime, unemployment, and unaffordable housing were practically non- existent. Yet, it would be misguided to suppose that electoral support for ex-communist parties equated to a desire for the return of the communist political regime. As Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan explain: . -
Socio-Spatial Change in Lithuania
09 2017 Socio-spatial change in Lithuania Depopulation and increasing spatial inequalities Rūta Ubarevičienė Socio-spatial change in Lithuania Depopulation and increasing spatial inequalities Rūta Ubarevičienė Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, OTB – Research for the Built Environment TOC abe.tudelft.nl Design: Sirene Ontwerpers, Rotterdam Cover photo: Andrius Ufartas (www.fotobankas.lt) ISBN 978-94-92516-75-6 ISSN 2212-3202 © 2017 Rūta Ubarevičienė All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the author. Unless otherwise specified, all the photographs in this thesis were taken by the author. For the use of illustrations effort has been made to ask permission for the legal owners as far as possible. We apologize for those cases in which we did not succeed. These legal owners are kindly requested to contact the publisher. TOC To my beloved family TOC TOC Foreword Lithuania is a small European country (pop. 2.9 million in 2016), located on the eastern border of the EU, surrounded by Latvia, Belarus, Poland, Kaliningrad Oblast (Russia) and the Baltic Sea. Quite recently, in 1990, the country regained its independence from the Soviet Union and began a process of democratic development. Both its peripheral geographical location and its history have created demographic and economic challenges that Lithuania has had to face over recent decades. The most significant issue is the huge drop in population, with Lithuania losing more than 20 percent of its inhabitants since the 1990s, which makes it one of the fastest shrinking countries in the world. -
2016 Lithuania Country Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators
Lithuania Report Vitalis Nakrosis, Ramunas Vilpisauskas, Detlef Jahn (Coordinator) m o c . a i l o t o F – Sustainable Governance g i n n a v Indicators 2016 o j © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2016 | 2 Lithuania Report Executive Summary Formal democracy is well developed in Lithuania. Participation rights, electoral competition and the rule of law are generally respected by the Lithuanian authorities. However, substantive democracy suffers from a few weaknesses. Despite some recent improvements, party financing is not sufficiently monitored or audited, and campaign-financing fraud is not subject to adequate enforcement. In addition, discrimination continues to be evident, sometimes significantly so. Most importantly, corruption is not sufficiently contained in Lithuania. Anti-corruption legislation is well developed, but the public sector continues to offer opportunities for abuses of power or position, and the enforcement of anti-corruption laws remains insufficient. Lithuanian policymakers have sought to establish and maintain social, economic and environmental conditions promoting their citizens’ well-being. However, the country’s policy performance remains mixed, with social-policy results lagging behind those of economic and environmental policies. Some observers attribute this to transition and EU-integration processes that have focused on primarily political, economic and administrative matters. The country’s formal governance arrangements are quite well designed. However, these arrangements do not always function to their full potential. There are significant gaps in policy implementation and in practical use of the impact- assessment process for most important policy decisions, and societal consultation remains underdeveloped. There were a few important developments in the 2014 – 2015 period. In 2015, the country’s first direct mayoral election were held successfully.