DOCSLIB.ORG

Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of Topic 017 RUB South AND IN THE MATTER of the submissions and further submissions set out in the Parties and Issues Report JOINT STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF VRINDA MOGHE, DANNI BRIGGS AND JOY LA NAUZE ON BEHALF OF AUCKLAND COUNCIL (URBAN EDGE – FLATBUSH, HOWICK - EAST TAMAKI, POINT VIEW DRIVE, MANGERE, FAVONA, OTAHUHU AND HINGAIA) 15 OCTOBER 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 2 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5 3. CODE OF CONDUCT .................................................................................................... 5 4. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................... 6 5. REZONING .................................................................................................................... 7 6. SUB-GROUP 1 HOWICK – EAST TAMAKI: POINT VIEW DRIVE ................................. 7 7. SUB-GROUP 2 – FLAT BUSH ..................................................................................... 17 8. SUB-GROUP 3 - MANGERE, FAVONA AND OTAHUHU ............................................ 24 9. SUB-GROUP 4 - HINGAIA .......................................................................................... 29 10. CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO OTHER PARTS OF THE PAUP ................ 36 11. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................... 36 Page 1 1. SUMMARY 1.1 Our names are Vrinda Moghe, Danni Briggs and Joy LaNauze. We are planners at Auckland Council (Council). Our evidence addresses Rural Urban Boundary (RUB) submissions that have been grouped into the "Urban Edge" group of submissions. Reasons for grouping these areas together has been discussed in the joint statement of evidence of Mr Trevor Watson, Mr Peter Vari and Mr Eryn Shields. Howick- East Tamaki 1.2 Several submitters have sought an expansion to the existing eastern urban edge along Point View Drive. 1.3 The proposed RUB follows the 2010 Metropolitan Urban Limit (MUL) in this location, with the exception of one property at 178 Point View Drive, that was included within the proposed RUB at the time of notification of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP). 1.4 Submitters consider expanding the urban area along the Point View Drive section of the ridgeline will lead to efficient use of land and provide for additional residential development in the region. 1.5 Submissions have also been received on amending the proposed RUB to the 2010 MUL i.e. excluding 178 Point View Drive from the urban area. Submitters consider inclusion of this property within the RUB has set a precedent of urban development in the area that could have an adverse impact on the surrounding rural uses. 1.6 The Council’s landscape expert witness Ms Rebecca Skidmore is of the view that the elevated area under consideration acts as an effective buffer to the more intensively developed urban corridor to the west and the rural uses to the east. In addition to the topography, established large scale vegetation assists dwellings to integrate with the surrounding landscape and visually reinforces the ridgeline when viewed from the west. She considers that from a landscape and urban design perspective, the location of the RUB as notified will maintain the buffer and backdrop to the urban environment. I agree with the conclusions of Ms Skidmore. 1.7 No information has been provided by the submitters on the potential transport infrastructure effects. Auckland Transport (AT) has indicated that urbanisation of the Page 2 area will require the upgrade of Point View Drive from a rural to urban standard. This would be a reasonably significant investment for the relatively low yield of residential development achieved. 1.8 Consequently, I consider the notified RUB along Point View Drive to be the most appropriate location to achieve the objectives of B2.1 and B2.2 of the RPS that seek to promote a compact urban form and a quality built environment. Flat Bush 1.9 A number of submitters have sought expansion of the urban area of Flat Bush (over countryside living areas) that was informed by extensive planning processes in the 2000s. 1.10 Submitters seeking the expansion state that there is additional land which is capable of urban development in the catchment. The submitters identify the area as an ideal location for accommodating part of the region’s urban population and consider that the PAUP has not given sufficient regard to the efficient use and development of the future urban land or to the supply of housing in Auckland which will result in unacceptable delays in the release of land. 1.11 The Council’s landscape expert witness Ms Rebecca Skidmore is of the view the elevated topography and the vegetation patterns in the area, assisted by the lower intensity residential environment within the Countryside Living zone, reinforces the landscape value of this area and provides a backdrop to the more intensively developing urban environment in the lowlands to the west. Ms Skidmore and Mr Hillier (the Council’s expert witness on geotechnical matters) note deeply dissected gullies within the upper catchment and associated geotechnical constraints that prohibit urban densities to be located within the area. 1.12 Ms Skidmore supports the proposed RUB location in Flat Bush, as in her view the historic subdivision patterns will limit the potential for further development at an urban intensity to create a good urban structure. I agree with the conclusions of Ms Skidmore. 1.13 AT is of the view that urban expansion of Flat Bush into the upper catchment along the ridge would place considerable pressure on the surrounding roading network. 1.14 Urban expansion into the upper catchment will also lead to development within areas marked as conservation stormwater management policy areas. Urbanisation would Page 3 require a reconsideration of the stormwater management strategy for the entire Otara catchment as development within the upper catchment would lead to additional impervious surfaces and associated stormwater flows into the already urbanised lower catchments. 1.15 I consider retaining the notified RUB is the most appropriate way to achieve the objectives of B2.1 of the RPS as it supports a quality compact urban form with a clear defensible limit to urban expansion. Furthermore, the retention of the proposed RUB in this location protects a number of sensitive landscape features, including the Redoubt Road ridgeline, the streams and conservation stormwater management policy areas in the upper catchment, and the identified significant ecological areas from inappropriate development. 1.16 I consider the notified RUB is effective in providing certainty, particularly with regard to character and amenity outcomes, while promoting significant environmental protection and enhancement for wider community benefits. Mangere, Favona and Otahuhu 1.17 The Council received several submissions regarding the southern RUB, specifically within Mangere, Favona and Otahuhu. The location of the RUB in this area reflects the fairly recent Environment Court Decision of Gavin H Wallace Ltd & Ors v Auckland Council [2012] NZEnvC 120 on Plan Change 13 to the Auckland Regional Policy Statement (PC13) and Plan Change 14 to the Auckland Council District Plan (Manukau Section) (PC14), which were made operative in May 2013. 1.18 Submitters have sought minor alterations to the RUB in the Ihumatao area, to include or exclude land from the RUB. Inclusion of the Auckland International Airport designated land and the Rennie Homestead site (619 Oruarangi Road) in the RUB would create a clear and defensible boundary and remove isolated rural parcels. However, the exclusion of the property at 1 Oruarangi Road would isolate this parcel and would not create a clear defensible RUB I consider that this property should remain within the RUB. 1.19 There are two submissions which relate to properties well within the urban area seeking to either retain the situation where the RUB does not apply to the site or to include a RUB along the coastline. I consider that no change should be made to the RUB in these locations. Page 4 Hingaia 1.20 Three submitters support the RUB as notified. 1.21 One submission relates to Pararekau and Kopuahingahinga Islands and seeks to include them in the RUB. 1.22 I do not support the inclusion of Pararekau and Kopuahingahinga Islands within the RUB. As discussed in the evidence of the Council's landscape witness, Mr Peter Kensington, Pararekau and Kopuahingahinga Islands have a unique coastal and non- urban character and this should be retained. The islands are an important sensitive environment visually, environmentally, and culturally, and therefore differentiated from urban zoned land on the mainland. 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 This evidence is a joint statement prepared by Vrinda Moghe (Principal Planner), Danni Briggs (Planner) and Joy LaNauze (Principal Planner) for PAUP Topic 017 RUB South (Topic 017). This statement relates to the submissions received on the RUB that comprise the Urban Edge group of submissions. This includes: Howick- East Tamaki - Point View Drive (Sub-Group
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schedule 14.1 Schedule of Historic Heritage [Rcp/Dp]
    Schedule 14.1 Schedule of Historic Heritage [rcp/dp] Introduction The criteria in B5.2.2(1) to (5) have been used to determine the significant historic heritage places in this schedule and will be used to assess any proposed additions to it. The criteria that contribute to the heritage values of scheduled historic heritage in Schedule 14.1 are referenced with the following letters: A: historical B: social C: Mana Whenua D: knowledge E: technology F: physical attributes G: aesthetic H: context. Information relating to Schedule 14.1 Schedule 14.1 includes for each scheduled historic heritage place; • an identification reference (also shown on the Plan maps) • a description of a scheduled place • a verified location and legal description and the following information: Reference to Archaeological Site Recording Schedule 14.1 includes in the place name or description a reference to the site number in the New Zealand Archaeological Association Site Recording Scheme for some places, for example R10_709. Categories of scheduled historic heritage places Schedule 14.1 identifies the category of significance for historic heritage places, namely: (a) outstanding significance well beyond their immediate environs (Category A); or (b) the most significant scheduled historic heritage places scheduled in previous district plans where the total or substantial demolition or destruction was a discretionary or non-complying activity, rather than a prohibited activity (Category A*). This is an interim category until a comprehensive re-evaluation of these places is undertaken and their category status is addressed through a plan change process; or 1 (c) considerable significance to a locality or greater geographic area (Category B).
    [Show full text]
  • TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach
    Warkworth Makarau Waiwera Puhoi TOP MEDIAN SALE PRICE (OCT19—SEP20) Hatfields Beach Wainui EPSOM .............. $1,791,000 HILLSBOROUGH ....... $1,100,000 WATTLE DOWNS ......... $856,750 Orewa PONSONBY ........... $1,775,000 ONE TREE HILL ...... $1,100,000 WARKWORTH ............ $852,500 REMUERA ............ $1,730,000 BLOCKHOUSE BAY ..... $1,097,250 BAYVIEW .............. $850,000 Kaukapakapa GLENDOWIE .......... $1,700,000 GLEN INNES ......... $1,082,500 TE ATATŪ SOUTH ....... $850,000 WESTMERE ........... $1,700,000 EAST TĀMAKI ........ $1,080,000 UNSWORTH HEIGHTS ..... $850,000 Red Beach Army Bay PINEHILL ........... $1,694,000 LYNFIELD ........... $1,050,000 TITIRANGI ............ $843,000 KOHIMARAMA ......... $1,645,500 OREWA .............. $1,050,000 MOUNT WELLINGTON ..... $830,000 Tindalls Silverdale Beach SAINT HELIERS ...... $1,640,000 BIRKENHEAD ......... $1,045,500 HENDERSON ............ $828,000 Gulf Harbour DEVONPORT .......... $1,575,000 WAINUI ............. $1,030,000 BIRKDALE ............. $823,694 Matakatia GREY LYNN .......... $1,492,000 MOUNT ROSKILL ...... $1,015,000 STANMORE BAY ......... $817,500 Stanmore Bay MISSION BAY ........ $1,455,000 PAKURANGA .......... $1,010,000 PAPATOETOE ........... $815,000 Manly SCHNAPPER ROCK ..... $1,453,100 TORBAY ............. $1,001,000 MASSEY ............... $795,000 Waitoki Wade HAURAKI ............ $1,450,000 BOTANY DOWNS ....... $1,000,000 CONIFER GROVE ........ $783,500 Stillwater Heads Arkles MAIRANGI BAY ....... $1,450,000 KARAKA ............. $1,000,000 ALBANY ............... $782,000 Bay POINT CHEVALIER .... $1,450,000 OTEHA .............. $1,000,000 GLENDENE ............. $780,000 GREENLANE .......... $1,429,000 ONEHUNGA ............. $999,000 NEW LYNN ............. $780,000 Okura Bush GREENHITHE ......... $1,425,000 PAKURANGA HEIGHTS .... $985,350 TAKANINI ............. $780,000 SANDRINGHAM ........ $1,385,000 HELENSVILLE .......... $985,000 GULF HARBOUR ......... $778,000 TAKAPUNA ........... $1,356,000 SUNNYNOOK ............ $978,000 MĀNGERE .............
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Schools of New Zealand
    All Secondary Schools of New Zealand Code School Address ( Street / Postal ) Phone Fax / Email Aoraki ASHB Ashburton College Walnut Avenue PO Box 204 03-308 4193 03-308 2104 Ashburton Ashburton [email protected] 7740 CRAI Craighead Diocesan School 3 Wrights Avenue Wrights Avenue 03-688 6074 03 6842250 Timaru Timaru [email protected] GERA Geraldine High School McKenzie Street 93 McKenzie Street 03-693 0017 03-693 0020 Geraldine 7930 Geraldine 7930 [email protected] MACK Mackenzie College Kirke Street Kirke Street 03-685 8603 03 685 8296 Fairlie Fairlie [email protected] Sth Canterbury Sth Canterbury MTHT Mount Hutt College Main Road PO Box 58 03-302 8437 03-302 8328 Methven 7730 Methven 7745 [email protected] MTVW Mountainview High School Pages Road Private Bag 907 03-684 7039 03-684 7037 Timaru Timaru [email protected] OPHI Opihi College Richard Pearse Dr Richard Pearse Dr 03-615 7442 03-615 9987 Temuka Temuka [email protected] RONC Roncalli College Wellington Street PO Box 138 03-688 6003 Timaru Timaru [email protected] STKV St Kevin's College 57 Taward Street PO Box 444 03-437 1665 03-437 2469 Redcastle Oamaru [email protected] Oamaru TIMB Timaru Boys' High School 211 North Street Private Bag 903 03-687 7560 03-688 8219 Timaru Timaru [email protected] TIMG Timaru Girls' High School Cain Street PO Box 558 03-688 1122 03-688 4254 Timaru Timaru [email protected] TWIZ Twizel Area School Mt Cook Street Mt Cook Street
    [Show full text]
  • South & East Auckland
    G A p R D D Paremoremo O N R Sunnynook Course EM Y P R 18 U ParemoremoA O H N R D E M Schnapper Rock W S Y W R D O L R SUNSET RD E R L ABERDEEN T I A Castor Bay H H TARGE SUNNYNOOK S Unsworth T T T S Forrest C Heights E O South & East Auckland R G Hill R L Totara Vale R D E A D R 1 R N AIRA O S Matapihi Point F W F U I T Motutapu E U R RD Stony Batter D L Milford Waitemata THE R B O D Island Thompsons Point Historic HI D EN AR KITCHENER RD Waihihi Harbour RE H Hakaimango Point Reserve G Greenhithe R R TRISTRAM Bayview D Kauri Point TAUHINU E Wairau P Korakorahi Point P DIANA DR Valley U IPATIKI CHIVALRY RD HILLSIDERD 1 A R CHARTWELL NZAF Herald K D Lake Takapuna SUNNYBRAE RD SHAKESPEARE RD ase RNZAF T Pupuke t Island 18 Glenfield AVE Takapuna A Auckland nle H Takapuna OCEAN VIEW RD kland a I Golf Course A hi R Beach Golf Course ro O ia PT T a E O Holiday Palm Beach L R HURSTMERE RD W IL D Park D V BEACH HAVEN RD NORTHCOTE R BAY RD R N Beach ARCHERS RD Rangitoto B S P I O B E K A S D A O D Island Haven I R R B R A I R K O L N U R CORONATION RD O E Blackpool H E Hillcrest R D A A K R T N Church Bay Y O B A SM K N D E N R S Birkdale I R G Surfdale MAN O’WA Hobsonville G A D R North Shore A D L K A D E Rangitawhiri Point D E Holiday Park LAK T R R N OCEANRALEIGH VIEW RD I R H E A R E PUPUKE Northcote Hauraki A 18 Y D EXMOUTH RD 2 E Scott Pt D RD L R JUTLAND RD E D A E ORAPIU RD RD S Birkenhead V I W K D E A Belmont W A R R K ONEWA L HaurakiMotorway .
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Council District Plan (Manukau Section) Plan Amendment 88
    Minister of Education Notice of Requirement for Flat Bush School 187 Flat Bush School Road Revision History Date Issue Description 28/09/15 1 Draft for review 11/01/16 2 Final draft for client review 15/02/16 3 Final for submission CONTENTS 1.0 THE REQUIRING AUTHORITY AND PROPERTY DETAILS .................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................ 2 3.1 Location ............................................................................................................ 2 3.2 Existing Site ...................................................................................................... 2 3.3 Surrounding Land use ...................................................................................... 3 4.0 NATURE OF THE PROPOSED DESIGNATION ..................................................... 3 4.1 Activity Outline ................................................................................................. 3 4.2 Site Development ............................................................................................. 4 4.3 Buildings ........................................................................................................... 5 4.4 Transport .......................................................................................................... 5 4.5 Outdoor recreation facilities ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South & East Auckland Auckland Airport
    G A p R D D Paremoremo O N R Sunnynook Course EM Y P R 18 U ParemoremoA O H N R D E M Schnapper Rock W S Y W R D O L R SUNSET RD E R L ABERDEEN T I A Castor Bay H H TARGE SUNNYNOOK S Unsworth T T T S Forrest C Heights E O South & East Auckland R G Hill R L Totara Vale R D E A D R 1 R N AIRA O S Matapihi Point F W F U I T Motutapu E U R RD Stony Batter D L Milford Waitemata THE R B O D Island Thompsons Point Historic HI D EN AR KITCHENER RD Waihihi Harbour RE H Hakaimango Point Reserve G Greenhithe R R TRISTRAM Bayview D Kauri Point TAUHINU E Wairau P Korakorahi Point P DIANA DR Valley U IPATIKI CHIVALRY RD HILLSIDERD 1 A R CHARTWELL NZAF Herald K D Lake Takapuna SUNNYBRAE RD SHAKESPEARE RD ase RNZAF T Pupuke t Island 18 Glenfield AVE Takapuna A Auckland nle H Takapuna OCEAN VIEW RD kland a I Golf Course A hi R Beach Golf Course ro O ia PT T a E O Holiday Palm Beach L R HURSTMERE RD W IL D Park D V BEACH HAVEN RD NORTHCOTE R N Beach ARCHERS RD Rangitoto B S P I O B E K A S D A O Island Haven I RD R B R A I R K O L N U R CORONATION RD O E Blackpool H E Hillcrest R D A A K R T N Church Bay Y O B A SM K N D E N R S Birkdale I R G Surfdale MAN O’WAR BAY RD Hobsonville G A D R North Shore A D L K A D E Rangitawhiri Point D E Holiday Park LAK T R R N OCEANRALEIGH VIEW RD I R H E A R E PUPUKE Northcote Hauraki A 18 Y D EXMOUTH RD 2 E Scott Pt D RD L R JUTLAND RD E D A E ORAPIU RD RD S Birkenhead V I W K D E A Belmont W R A L R Hauraki Gulf I MOKO ONEWA R P IA RD D D Waitemata A HINEMOA ST Waiheke LLE RK Taniwhanui Point W PA West Harbour OLD LAKE Golf Course Pakatoa Point L E ST Chatswood BAYSWATER VAUXHALL RD U 1 Harbour QUEEN ST Bayswater RD Narrow C D Motuihe KE NS R Luckens Point Waitemata Neck Island AWAROA RD Chelsea Bay Golf Course Park Point Omiha Motorway .
    [Show full text]
  • GP Auckland Travel Guide.Docx
    GP Auckland Travel Guide Written by Alan Peng & Matthew Miles-Watson Intro: Welcome to Auckland, the City of Sails! Located on a unique geological isthmus, the city is New Zealand’s largest and most populous city. We hope that this travel guide will be a helpful tool to learn more about this vibrant and multicultural city. Venue: The Grand Prix itself will be located in the Aotea Centre, right in the heart of Auckland’s CBD. It is easily accessed from all bus/train/ferry routes, and a 10 minute walk from Britomart - the main transport station in Auckland. The judge conference will be held in the Pioneer’s Women hall, also located in the CBD. It is located just off High Street, on the corner of Courthouse Lane and Chancery street. It isn’t hard to miss if you walk down along High Street. From High Street, you will be able to see the courtyard and the Pumpkin Patch. Above it is the Pioneer Women’s hall. The above picture is a view from Chancery street facing High Street. Getting to the venue From the airport: The most convenient and cheapest option is to take the airport bus from the international or domestic terminals and stop at the Auckland Town Hall. For the conference, you can get off at the bus stop by the CTS house at 175 Queen street. You can find more information about the airbus on http://www.airbus.co.nz/ - Fares are $16 one way from the airport to town. From around town: Generally, all forms stop at various points in the central city which will be within a 10 minute walk radius of the GP Venue.
    [Show full text]
  • New Network for East Auckland Consultation and Decisions Report
    New Network for East Auckland Consultation and Decisions Report Contents 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Background and Strategic Context ................................................................................................. 3 4. The Decision-Making Process ......................................................................................................... 4 5. Consultation Overview ..................................................................................................................... 5 5.1 Pre-Consultation ......................................................................................................................... 5 5.2 Consultation Period .................................................................................................................... 5 5.3 Post-Consultation Activity ......................................................................................................... 6 6. Public Engagement .......................................................................................................................... 6 6.1 Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................................................................... 6 6.2 Consultation Brochure ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Metro
    5/08/2021 Change in Delivery Partner- Auckland Metro Dear Valued Customer Effective Monday 9th August Auckland Metro deliveries and pick ups will be completed by Mainfreight. Map and Suburb list below for confirmation of affected areas Auckland Metro Ellerslie, Greenlane, Middlemore, Mt Wellington, Mt Wellington, One Tree Hill, Onehunga, Otahuhu, Area 1 Panmure, Penrose, Remuera, Royal Oak, Southdown, Tamaki, Te Papapa. Airport Oaks, Auckland Airport, Balmoral, Blockhouse Bay, Botany Downs, Clover Park, Burswood, Dannemora, East Tamaki, Epsom, Farm Cove, Favona, Flat Bush, Glen Innes, Goodwood Heights, Greenmount, Highbrook, Highland Park, Hillsborough, Lynfield, Mangere, Mangere Bridge, Manukau, Area 2 Meadowbank, Morningside, Mt Albert, Mt Eden, Mt Roskill, Northpark, Otara, Pakuranga, Papatoetoe, Pt England, Remuera, Sandringham, St Johns, St Lukes, Stonefields, Sunnyhills, Three Kings, Totara Heights, Wiri Avondale, Birkenhead, Castor Bay, Chatswood, Clendon, Conifer Grove, Edmonton, Forrest Hill, Glen Eden, Glendene, Glendowie, Glenfield, Green Bay, Hauraki, Half Moon Bay, Highbury, Hillcrest, Howick, Kelston, Area 3 Kohimaramara, Manurewa, Milford, Mission Bay, New Lynn, Northcote, Northcote Point, Orakei, Pt Chevalier, St Heliers, Te Atatu Peninsula, Takanini, Takapuna, Totara Vale, Wairau Valley, Waterview, Wattle Downs, Western Springs, Westmere, Weymouth Albany, Alfriston, Arch Hill, Auckland Central, Bayswater, Bayview, Beach Haven, Belmont, Birkdale, Bucklands Beach, Campbells Bay, Cockle Bay, Eastern Beach, Eden Terrace, Fairview Heights, Freemans Bay, Grafton, Grey Lynn, Henderson, Henderson Valley, Herne Bay, Hobsonville, Kingsland, Mairangi Bay, Area 4 Massey, Murrays Bay, Newmarket, Newton, North Harbour, Papakura, Parnell, Ponsonby, Ranui, Rosedale, Rosehill, Rothesay Bay, Royal Heights, St Marys Bay, Sunnynook, Swanson, Titirangi, West Harbour, Westgate Westhaven Ardmore, Bombay, Browns Bay, Devonport, Drury, Greenhithe, Herald Island, Karaka, Kumeu, Pukekohe, Area 5 Ramarama, Redvale, Torbay .
    [Show full text]
  • Of Auckland's Shopping Enclaves
    Espaços públicos da cidade pós-consumista: a ‘alteridade’ dos enclaves comerciais de Auckland, New Zealand Public spaces in the post-consumerist city: the ‘otherness’ of Auckland’s shopping enclaves Los espacios públicos de la ciudad post-consumista: la ‘alteridad’ de los enclaves comerciales de Auckland MANFREDINI, Manfredo and RUGIK GOMEZ, Sergio School of Architecture and Planning, the University of Auckland, New Zealand Corresponding Author: MANFREDINI, Manfredo, [email protected] Public spaces in the post-consumerist city: The ‘otherness’ of Auckland’s shopping enclaves Espaços públicos da cidade pós-consumista: a ‘alteridade’ dos enclaves comerciais de Auckland, New Zealand Resumo Novos fatores recombinantes emergentes no espaço público urbano contrariam a crescente disjunção de lugares urbanos sujeitos a mercantilização e privatização. Nas cidades de baixa densidade no âmbito de quadros políticos neoliberais, esses fatores têm desenvolvido lugares peculiares de relação social: os enclaves urbanos integrados dedicados ao consumo e estilo de vida, que são a mais recente evolução dos centros comerciais. Estes enclaves são locais heterotópicos mobilizados pelo espetáculo que rapidamente incorporam as mudanças fundamentais que ocorrem nas relações entre arquitetura e vida associativa em nossa era digital pós- consumista contemporânea. O artigo discute uma análise comparativa da nova tipologia de shopping centers recentemente introduzidas em Auckland, New Zealand, explorando o importante desafio que representam para a arquitetura e design urbano na definição do futuro do espaço público. Palavras-chave: Auckland, Espaço Público, Shopping centers V COLÓQUIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE O COMÉRCIO E CIDADE: UMA RELAÇÃO DE ORIGEM Page 1 of 19 Public spaces in the post-consumerist city: the ‘otherness’ of Auckland’s shopping enclaves Abstract New recombinant factors emerging in urban public space counteract the increasing disjunction of urban places subject to commodification and privatisation.
    [Show full text]
  • View Our Media Kit
    Times Media MEDIA KIT We are the readers choice CN 0 CN 0 CN 0 A Awards 202 A Awards 202 A Awards 202 Publishers of SOUTH EAST | FRANKLIN East design Auckland Settling In build App LEVEL 2 IN PICTURES Locals were so keen to get back to some normalcy when we dropped to Level 2 on Thursday. AWARD-WINNING VOICE OF THE COMMUNITY – NZCNA Est. 1972 See page 11. Have your own plans? Tuesday, May 19, 2020 General 09 271 8000 Classified 09 271 8055 Delivery Enquiries 09 271B 8000ring them Website to us.H avewww.times.co.nz your own plans? Vol 49, No 14 Building a home but prefer toB havering your them to us. plan drawn independently? BringBuilding them a home to but prefer to have your us and we will price them forplan you drawn. independently? Bring them to *Conditions apply us and we will price them for you. Come and see us at:*Conditions apply New Display Home open. 146 Eighth ViewOr if it's inspiration Avenue, you are afterNew come Display on Home open. over to Jennian Homes CBDOr & ifEast it's inspiration you are after come on Christopher Luxon Beachlands Auckland’s brand new Displayover Home to Jennian to Homes CBD & East see what this exceptional homeAuckland’s has to brand new Display Home to Botany • REPAIR • DESIGN • VALUE see what this exceptional home has to JH15993 offer - 146 Eighth View Ave, Beachlands.KC14848 P 09 918 9078 | jennian.co.nzoffer - 146 Eighth View Ave, Beachlands. Open: Monday - Sunday, 10am - 4pm P: 0800 628 268 HANDLING YOUR JEWELLERY WITH E [email protected] Open: Monday - Sunday, 10amwww.checkmein.co.nz - 4pm EXPERIENCE AND CARE E: [email protected] Made in Howick FB: @christopherluxon JennianSINCE Homes 1984 CBD & East AucklandJennian Homes CBD & East Auckland• Design & Build 59B Sir William Ave, East Tamaki 59B Sir William Ave, East Tamaki Major Sponsor Major Sponsor 09 534 7404 | 59 Picton Street, Howick • House & land P 09 918 9078 E [email protected] 09 918 9078 E [email protected] Phone 535 2002 Authorised by C.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland's Urban Form
    A brief history of Auckland’s urban form April 2010 A brief history of Auckland’s urban form April 2010 Introduction 3 1840 – 1859: The inaugural years 5 1860 – 1879: Land wars and development of rail lines 7 1880 – 1899: Economic expansion 9 1900 – 1929: Turning into a city 11 1930 – 1949: Emergence of State housing provision 13 1950 – 1969: Major decisions 15 1970 – 1979: Continued outward growth 19 1980 – 1989: Intensifi cation through infi ll housing 21 1990 – 1999: Strategies for growth 22 2000 – 2009: The new millennium 25 Conclusion 26 References and further reading 27 Front cover, top image: North Shore, Auckland (circa 1860s) artist unknown, Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tamaki, gift of Marshall Seifert, 1991 This report was prepared by the Social and Economic Research and Monitoring team, Auckland Regional Council, April 2010 ISBN 978-1-877540-57-8 2 History of Auckland’s Urban Form Auckland region Built up area 2009 History of Auckland’s Urban Form 3 Introduction This report he main feature of human settlement in the Auckland region has been the development This report outlines the of a substantial urban area (the largest in development of Auckland’s New Zealand) in which approximately 90% urban form, from early colonial Tof the regional population live. This metropolitan area settlement to the modern Auckland is located on and around the central isthmus and metropolis. It attempts to capture occupies around 10% of the regional land mass. Home the context and key relevant to over 1.4 million people, Auckland is a vibrant centre drivers behind the growth in for trade, commerce, culture and employment.
    [Show full text]