DOCSLIB.ORG

Bristol Bay and the Bering Sea on the North and West from the Pacific Ocean on the South and East

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bristol Bay and the Bering Sea on the North and West from the Pacific Ocean on the South and East ALASKA PENINSULA/BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX King Salmon, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT 0 Calendar Year f 991 0 Department of the Interior and Wildlife Service WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEWS AND APPROVALS ALASKA PENINSULA/BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX King Salmon, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1991 US FISH & WILDLI FE SERVICE--ALASKA 111~~~~~00~~~~~~~~ 3 4982 00020984 0 ALASKA PENINSULA/BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE COMPLEX King Salmon, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1991 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. HIGHLIGHTS .............................. 9 B. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS .................... 10 C. LAND ACQUISITION 1. Fee Title .......................................................... 14 2. Easements ......................................................... NTR 3. Other ............................................................. NTR D. PLANNING 1. Master Plan ....................................................... NTR 2. Management Plan .................................................... 16 3. Public Participation ............................................... 17 4. Compliance with Environmental Mandates ............................. 18 5. Research and Investigations ........................................ 20 6. Other .............................................................. 20 7. Subsistence ........................................................ 21 E. ADMINISTRATION 1. Personnel .......................................................... 23 2. Youth Programs ..................................................... 38 3. Other Staffing Programs ............................................ 39 4. Volunteer Programs ................................................. 40 5 . Funding ............................................................ 40 6. Safety ............................................................. 42 7. Technical Assistance ............................................... 46 8. Other Items ........................................................ 47 F. HABITAT MANAGEMENT l. General ............................................................ 49 2. Wetlands ........................................................... 50 3. Forests ........................................................... NTR 4. Crop lands ......................................................... NTR 5. Grasslands ........................................................ NTR 6. Other Habitats ..................................................... 51 7. Grazing ........................................................... NTR 8 . Haying ............................................................ NTR 9. Fire Management ................................................... NTR 10. Pest Control ...................................................... NTR 11. Water Rights ...................................................... NTR 12. Wilderness and Special Areas ....................................... 52 13. WPA Easement Monitoring ........................................... NTR 14. Exxon Valdez Oil Spill ............................................. 54 G. WILDLIFE 1. Wildlife Diversity ................................................ NTR 2. Endangered andjor Threatened Species ............................... 56 3. Waterfowl .......................................................... 57 4. Marsh and Water Birds ............................................. NTR 5. Shorebirds, Gulls, Terns, and Allied Species ....................... 67 6. Raptors ............................................................ 76 7. Other Migratory Birds .............................................. 77 8 . Game Mammals ....................................................... 7 9 9. Marine Mammals ..................................................... 89 10. Other Resident Wildlife ........................................... NTR 11. Fisheries Resources ................................................ 90 12. Wildlife Propogation and Stocking ................................. NTR 13. Surplus Animal Disposal ............................................ 93 14. Scientific Collection ............................................. NTR 15. Animal Control .................................................... NTR 16. Marking and Banding ............................................... NTR 17. Disease Prevention and Control .................................... NTR 18. Subsistence ........................................................ 93 H. PUBLIC USE 1. General ............................................................ 94 2. Outdoor Classrooms- Students ...................................... 98 3. Outdoor Classrooms- Teachers ...................................... 99 4. Interpretive Foot Trails .......................................... NTR 5. Interpretive Tour Trails .......................................... NTR 6. Interpretive Exhibits/Demonstrations ............................... 99 7. Other Interpretive Programs ....................................... 100 8. Hunting ........................................................... 103 9. Fishing ........................................................... 106 10. Trapping .......................................................... 108 11. Wildlife Observation .............................................. NTR 12. Other Wildlife Oriented Recreation ................................ NTR 13. Camping ........................................................... NTR 14. Picnicking ........................................................ NTR 15. Off-Road Vehicling ................................................ 108 16. Other Non-Wildlife Oriented Recreation ............................ NTR 17. Law Enforcement ................................................... 109 18. Cooperating Associations .......................................... 114 19. Concessions ....................................................... NTR 20. Cabins ............................................................ 114 21. Guides and Outfitters ............................................. 116 22. Take Pride in America and Alaska .................................. 122 23. Subsistence ....................................................... 124 I. EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 1. New Construction .................................................. 124 2. Rehabilitation .................................................... 125 3. Major Maintenance ................................................. 127 4. Equipment and Utilization and Replacement ......................... 129 5. Communications Systems ............................................ 130 6. Computer Systems .................................................. 131 7. Energy Conservation ............................................... 132 8. Other ............................................................. 133 J. OTHER ITEMS 1. Cooperative Programs .............................................. 133 2. Other Economic Uses ............................................... 134 3. Items of Interest ................................................. 135 4. Credits ........................................................... 137 K. FEEDBACK ........................... 138 INTRODUCTION The Alaska Peninsula splits Bristol Bay and the Bering Sea on the north and west from the Pacific Ocean on the south and east. This rugged peninsula juts out in a southwesterly crescent from the mainland beginning a t the 59th parallel of latitude and running nearly 400 miles to about the 54th parallel. The southwestward crescent is continued for another 1, 500 miles by the Aleutian Islands . The backbone of the Alaska Peninsula is the Aleutian Mountain Range . This volcanic mountain range lies along the Pacific coast on the east side of the peninsula. Numerous peaks rise above 6,000 feet elevation. This creates a Pacific coast that is rocky and heavily fjorded. The Aleutian Range, including the Aleutian Islands , contains nearly 50 volcanoes known to have erupted or vented steam since 1760. They are part of a chain of volcanoes that rim the Pacific Ocean known as the "Ring of Fire" . The Alaska Peninsula and Becharof National Wildlife Refuges (Figure 1) are superimposed over this rugged range of mountains . The Kejulik Pinnacles on the Becharof Refuge and Katmai National Park boundary typify the rugged Aleutian Mountain Range. 7/91 , DAD r The Becharof Refuge contains approximately 1.2 million acres (Figure 2 ) . It is 10 miles south of King Salmon and 295 mil es sou thwest of Anchorage. The refuge lies between Katmai National Park and Alaska Peninsula Refuge . The refuge landscape consists of tundra, lakes, wetlands, and volcanic peaks. Becharof Lake , the second largest lake in Alaska, is nestled between the low tundra wetlands to the north and west and the Aleutian Mountain Range to the east and south. Mount Peulik drops to the edge of the lake about midway along its southern shore. The geologically active Ukinrek (Ookeenuk) Maars bares scars of the eruption that took place in 1977 . :C>:t:J 1-'· 1-'· }-'()Q 0..~ 1-'t-l 1-'· (!) >-h (!) !-' !AI (!) >-h l' Katmat National Park ~ 0 ()Q () & Preserve (!) Ill (JJ rt 1-'· 0 ::l 0 >-h rt ::r """ (!) ;J> 1-' Ill (JJ,.. ~<Q'l>-"i Ill ·F:;,\.0 <Q~ (!) "'::l 1-'· ::l Becharof National (JJ ~ Wildlife Refuge 1-' Ill Ill ::l 0.. tJj (!) Ugashik Unit () ::r Alaska Peninsula Ill t-1 National Wildlife 0 >-h Refuge z Ill rt 1-'· 0 Chignik Unit Pacific Ocean ::l Ill Alaska
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great Lakes Islands: Biodiversity Elements And
    GREAT LAKES ISLANDS: BIODIVERSITY ELEMENTS AND THREATS A FINAL REPORT TO THE GREAT LAKES NATIONAL PROGRAM OFFICE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AUGUST 6, 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this project has been provided by the Great Lakes Program Office (GLNPO) of the Environmental Protection Agency (Grant No. Gl-96521901: Framework for the Binational Conservation of Great Lakes Islands). We especially appreciated the support of our project officer, K. Rodriquez, and G. Gulezian, director of the GLNPO. Project team members were F. Cuthbert (University of Minnesota), D. Ewert (The Nature Conservancy), R. Greenwood (U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service), D. Kraus (The Nature Conservancy of Canada), M. Seymour (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service), K. Vigmostad (Principal Investigator, formerly of Northeast-Midwest Institute), and L. Wires (University of Minnesota). Team members for the Ontario portion of the project included W. Bakowsky (NHIC), B. Crins (Ontario Parks), J. Mackenzie (NHIC) and M. McMurtry (NHIC). GIS and technical support for this project has been provided by T. Krahn (Provincial Geomatics Service Centre, OMNR), J. Slatts (The Nature Conservancy), and G. White (The Nature Conservancy of Canada). Many others have provided scientific and policy support for this project. We particularly want to recognize M. DePhillips (The Nature Conservancy), G. Jackson (Parks Canada), B. Manny (Great Lakes Science Center), and C. Vasarhelyi (policy consultant). Cover photograph: A Bay on Gibraltar Island (Lake Erie) ©2005 Karen E. Vigmostad 2 Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Caspian Tern Nesting Island Construction Draft Supplemental
    Draft Supplemental Environmental Assessment (with Draft Amended FONSI) and Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Alternatives Analysis Caspian Tern Nesting Island Construction Project Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge Siskiyou and Modoc Counties, California U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District June 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Proposed Project 1.1 Proposed Project Description 1.2 Proposed Location 1.3 Purpose and Need for Proposed Action 1.4 Project Authority 2.0 Scope of Analysis 3.0 Proposed Action 3.1 Habitat Construction: Sheepy Lake in Lower Klamath NWR 3.1.1 Demolition and Disposal of Sheepy Floating Island 3.1.2 Sheepy Rock Island Design 3.1.3 Timing of Construction 3.1.4 Construction Methods 3.1.5 Access 3.1.6 Staging Area 3.1.7 Temporary Access Road 3.1.8 Maintenance Methods 3.1.9 Summary of Fill Requirements and Footprint 3.1.10 Post-Construction Monitoring 4.0 Alternatives 4.1 No Action Alternative 4.2 Repair the existing floating island 5.0 Impact Assessment 6.0 Summary of Indirect and Cumulative Effects 6.1 Indirect Effects 6.1.1 Caspian Terns 6.1.2 Fishes 6.1.3 Endangered and Threatened Species 6.1.4 Other Birds 6.1.5 Socioeconomic Effects 6.2 Cumulative Impacts 7.0 Environmental Compliance 8.0 Agencies Consulted and Public Notifications 9.0 Mitigation Measures 10.0 Draft Amended FONSI LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 Map of Tule Lake NWR and Lower Klamath NWR within the vicinity of Klamath Basin NWRs, Oregon and California 3.1 Sheepy Lake Floating Island Failure (1 of 3) 3.2 Sheepy Lake Floating Island Failure (2 of 3) 3.3
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin № 1 Symposium
    INTRODUCTION THEMES Government Sakhalin Region Construction of infrastructure and transport structures in complicated The Symposium themes are geo-monitoring; modeling and prognosis of Far Eastern Railway geological conditions and to be safe under natural disasters is a very natural and emergency situations; preventive geotechnical measures for The Russian Academy of Architecture and challenging task and demands cooperating efforts from scientists, designers disaster reduction. and contractors. Complicated geotechnical problems are confronted under 1.Use geomaterials for construction and reconstruction transportation objets Construction Sciences conditions of high probability of earthquakes, landslides, mud flows, snow 2. Geomonitoring, modeling of geodynamic processes, prognoses of International Geosyntetical Society avalanches, flooding and other hazardous phenomena such as break of natural phenomena: dams, underground mountain row collapsing, a large-scale and intensive oil - earthquakes, tsunamis, typhoons; International Technical Committee №4 and gas leakage, industrial and terrorist explosions and other - landslids, mud flows, volcanic eruptions, floodings; of Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering and techno/antropogenic impacts. The International Technical Committee 203 - soil liquefaction, scuffling, swelling, freezing of the soil bases. of Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering and Associated Problems 3. Geotechnical measures for natural disaster reduction of: Associated Problems (TC203) (TC203); International Technical Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into Rhyolite Magma Dome Systems Based on Mineral and Whole Rock Compositions at the Mono Craters, Eastern California
    ABSTRACT INSIGHTS INTO RHYOLITE MAGMA DOME SYSTEMS BASED ON MINERAL AND WHOLE ROCK COMPOSITIONS AT THE MONO CRATERS, EASTERN CALIFORNIA The Mono Craters magmatic system, found in a transtensional tectonic setting, consists of small magmatic bodies, dikes, and sills. New sampling of the Mono Craters reveals a wider range of magmatic compositions and a more complex storage and delivery system than heretofore recognized. Space compositional patterns, as well as crystallization temperatures and pressures taken from olivine-, feldspar-, orthopyroxene-, and clinopyroxene-liquid equilibria, are used to create a new model for the Mono Craters magmatic system. Felsic magmas erupted throughout the entire Mono Craters chain, whereas intermediate batches only erupted at Domes 10-12 and 14. Mafic magmas are spatially restricted, having erupted only at Domes 10, 12 and 14. Data from the new whole rock analyses illustrates a linear trend. Fractional crystallization does not replicate this trend but rather the linear trend indicates magma mixing. This study also analyzes samples from the Mono Lake Islands and the June Lake Basalts and compares them to the Mono Craters. Although the Mono Lake Islands fall into the intermediate to felsic group, they contain distinctly higher Al2O3 and Na2O at a given SiO2. Therefore, this study concludes that the Mono Craters represent a distinct magmatic system not directly related to the magmatic activity that created the Mono Lake Islands. Michelle Ranee Johnson May 2017 INSIGHTS INTO RHYOLITE MAGMA DOME SYSTEMS BASED
    [Show full text]
  • NSF 03-021, Arctic Research in the United States
    This document has been archived. Home is Where the Habitat is An Ecosystem Foundation for Wildlife Distribution and Behavior This article was prepared The lands and near-shore waters of Alaska remaining from recent geomorphic activities such by Page Spencer, stretch from 48° to 68° north latitude and from 130° as glaciers, floods, and volcanic eruptions.* National Park Service, west to 175° east longitude. The immense size of Ecosystems in Alaska are spread out along Anchorage, Alaska; Alaska is frequently portrayed through its super- three major bioclimatic gradients, represented by Gregory Nowacki, USDA Forest Service; Michael imposition on the continental U.S., stretching from the factors of climate (temperature and precipita- Fleming, U.S. Geological Georgia to California and from Minnesota to tion), vegetation (forested to non-forested), and Survey; Terry Brock, Texas. Within Alaska’s broad geographic extent disturbance regime. When the 32 ecoregions are USDA Forest Service there are widely diverse ecosystems, including arrayed along these gradients, eight large group- (retired); and Torre Arctic deserts, rainforests, boreal forests, alpine ings, or ecological divisions, emerge. In this paper Jorgenson, ABR, Inc. tundra, and impenetrable shrub thickets. This land we describe the eight ecological divisions, with is shaped by storms and waves driven across 8000 details from their component ecoregions and rep- miles of the Pacific Ocean, by huge river systems, resentative photos. by wildfire and permafrost, by volcanoes in the Ecosystem structures and environmental Ring of Fire where the Pacific plate dives beneath processes largely dictate the distribution and the North American plate, by frequent earth- behavior of wildlife species.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal 78 – 5 Aac 01.320
    PROPOSAL 78 – 5 AAC 01.320. Lawful gear and gear specifications. Change the boundaries, methods of harvest, and seasons for subsistence harvests of sockeye salmon in the Naknek River drainage, as follows: 5 AAC 01.320 is amended to read: From August 30 through DECEMBER 31 by spear, dipnet, gillnet, AND BEACH SEINE. Along a 100 yard length of shoreline near the outlet of Naknek River as marked by ADF&G regulatory markers; at Johnny’s Lake on the Northwestern side of Naknek Lake; at the outlet of Idavians Creek on the North side of Naknek Lake; at the mouth of Brooks River from September 18 through December 31. What is the issue you would like the board to address and why? Allow for beach seining to release non-targeted finfish species. Idavians Creek is a traditional location used by local residents. (At the mouth of Brooks River by spear, dipnet, gillnet, and beach seine from September 18 through December 31.) Separate season for Brooks River. Extend season to Dec 31 for said descriptions and include beach seine as additional method to harvest spawned out sockeye. The proposed seasons and methods will be in line with traditionally practiced subsistence practices of local residents. The 2014 forecast for Bristol Bay sockeye for the Naknek River portion is estimated to be 3.35 million and escapement at 1.10 million into the Naknek River drainage. Forecast for harvest is estimated at 2.25 million. The Naknek River portion estimate does not account for the South Peninsula. Spawned out sockeye have traditionally been harvested for personal (subsistence) use by the Katmai descendants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Fish and Wildlife Resources by Residents of the Bristol Bay Borough, Alaska
    THE USE OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES BY RESIDENTS OF THE BRISTOL BAY BOROUGH, ALASKA BY Judith M. Morris Technical Paper Number 123 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence December 1985 ABSTRACT This report describes contemporary harvest and use patterns of wild fish and game resources of Bristol Bay Borough residents. Located on the Alaska Peninsula, the three borough communities of King Salmon, Naknek, and South Naknek are situated on the banks of the Naknek River. In 1980 the population of the borough was 879, excluding 375 active duty military personnel stationed at the King Salmon Air Force Station. Approximately half of the borough residents were Alaska Natives, most whom consider themselves Aleut. The extent of particpation and level of resource harvest and other socioeconomic data were collected by Division of Subsistence personnel. Data collection was conducted from May 1982 through April 1984. Research methods included participant-observation, mapping, literature review, and two systematic households surveys. Particular attention was focused on the local subsistence salmon fishery. Elements of the fishery, such as targarted species, harvest sites, processing and preservation methods, the composition of work groups and distribution networks were documented. Survey data collected for 1983 showed that sampled borough residents reported a mean per capita harvest of 215 pounds. Caribou and salmon made up 84 percent of the total harvest. It was found that salmon were obtained through harvests with set gill net subsistence gear, sport fishing with rod and reel gear, and fish retained from commercial catches. Many harvesting activities occurred within the Naknek River drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • STD/HIV Intervention and Research Programme Mwanza Region, NW Tanzania J Changalucha, a Gavyole, H Grosskurth, R Hayes, D Mabey
    i91 Sex Transm Infect: first published as 10.1136/sti.78.suppl_1.i91 on 1 April 2002. Downloaded from SYMPOSIUM STD/HIV intervention and research programme Mwanza Region, NW Tanzania J Changalucha, A Gavyole, H Grosskurth, R Hayes, D Mabey ............................................................................................................................. Sex Transm Infect 2002;78(Suppl I):i91–i96 The social determinants and epidemiology of sexually Population distribution transmitted disease (STD) were studied in rural The region had about 1.8 million inhabitants in 1988,1 and about 2.5 million inhabitants in 1999, communities in Mwanza Region, Tanzania, in the based on a population growth rate of 2.6% per context of the phase specific model of STD transmission. annum.3 The population in Mwanza town grows The prevalence of HIV and syphilis was higher in faster than that in rural areas (about 8% per annum), from around 200 000 people in 1988 to communities close to main roads, and lower in almost 500 000 by 1999. The region also has six communities living on islands in Lake Victoria, probably semiurban centres with a population of about reflecting the proportion of high risk individuals in the 20 000 each, serving as district administrative headquarters. The great majority of the popula- population. The prevalence of Herpes simplex virus type tion lives in rural villages or in communities with 2 infection, gonorrhoea, chlamydial infection, and widely scattered compounds. (A compound is a trichomoniasis was similar in all types of community, group of houses occupied by one or more families, and surrounded by their farm land.) reflecting the fact that these infections remain in the hyperendemic phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Peninsula Becharof National Wildlife Refuges
    Fishery Management Plan ALASKA PENINSULA BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES July 1994 Region 7 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • Department of the Interior FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN ALASKA PENINSULA AND BECHAROF NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES Fiscal Years 1994 - 1998 Prepared By: King Salmon Fishery Resource Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service P.O. Box 277 King Salmon, Alaska 99613 May 1994 SUMMARY STATEMENT The Alaska Peninsula and Becharof National Wildlife Refuges Fishery Management Plan (Plan) provides the management direction necessary to ensure conservation of fishery resources and habitat. In addition, the Plan provides for continued use of fishery resources by subsistence, commercial, and recreational users consistent with the purposes for which the Alaska Peninsula and Becharof refuges (Complex) were established and are managed. The Complex's biological and physical environment is described and fishery resources, human use, management history, and major issues and concerns are discussed. This information was obtained from the Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plans, a literature search, and discussions with Alaska Department of Fish and Game personnel. Objectives and tasks are developed to address the issues and concerns. Federal tasks are assigned priorities and costs for each year of continuation. The Plan encompasses a five year period, at which time it will be revised. Major issues and concerns identified include the following: competition between user groups; incomplete salmon escapement data bases to refine management of the Complex fish populations; and inadequate fishery law enforcement. In some cases, concerns were identified because of the perception that they would develop into serious problems if current levels of use or consumption were allowed to continue or expand.
    [Show full text]
  • CROSBY WETLANDS Flanagement DISTRICT LAKE ZAHL
    CROSBY WETLANDS flANAGEMENT DISTRICT LAKE ZAHL NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Crosby, North Dakota ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1989 U. S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEW AND APPROVALS CROSBY WETLANDS MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Crosby, North Dakota ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1989 ^3— jCA.- Refuge Manager Date Project Leader Ddte iiffi Date egional Office Approval 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .' S A. HIGHLIGHTS 6 B. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS 6 C. LAND ACQUISITION 1 . Fee Title 8 2. Easements 8 3. Other Nothing to Report D. PLANNING 1 . Master Plan . Nothing to Report 2. Management Plan 8 3. Public Participation Nothing to Report 4. Compliance with Environmental and Cultural Resource Mandates Nothing to Report 5. Research and Investigations Nothing to Report 6. Other Nothing to Report. E. ADMINISTRATION 1. Personnel . 9 2. Youth Programs Nothing to Report 3. Other Manpower Programs . Nothing to Report 4. Volunteer Programs, 11 5. Funding Nothing to Report 6. Safety 11 7. Technical Assistance 12 8. Other Nothing to Report F. HABITAT MANAGEMENT 1. General 17 2. Wetlands 17 3. Forests Nothing to Report 4. Croplands 21 5. Grasslands 21 6. Other Habitats 22 7. Grazing 23 8. Haying 25 9. Fire Management 25 10. Pest Control 27 11. Water Rights Nothing to Report 12. Wilderness and Special ireas ... Nothang to Report 13. WPA Easement. Monitoring. 27 14. Private Lands Enhancement. , . ...... 28 3 G. WILDLIFE 1. Wildlife Diversity - Nothing to Report 2. Endangered and/or Threatened Species 32 3. Waterfowl 34 4. Marsh and Water Birds Nothing to Report 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Spawning Ground Surveys in the Bristol Bay Area, Alaska, 2001
    SALMON SPAWNING GROUND SURVEYS IN THE BRISTOL BAY AREA, ALASKA, 2001 By James Browning Steve Morstad Tim Sands Keith Weiland Regional Information Report1 No. 2A02-14 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, Alaska 99518-1599 March, 2002 1 The Regional Information Report Series was established in 1987 to provide an information access system for all unpublished divisional reports. These reports frequently serve diverse ad hoc informational purposes or archive basic un-interpreted data. To accommodate timely reporting of recently collected information, reports in this series undergo only limited internal review and may contain preliminary data; this information may be subsequently finalized and published in the formal literature. Consequently, these reports should not be cited without prior approval of the author or the Division of Commercial Fisheries. AUTHORS James Browning is the Nushagak Area Management Biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Commercial Fisheries Division, 333 Raspberry Road, Anchorage, AK 99518. Steve Morstad is the Naknek/Kvichak Area Management Biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Commercial Fisheries Division, P.O. Box 37, King Salmon, AK 99613. Tim Sands is the Togiak Area Management Biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Commercial Fisheries Division, P.O. Box 230, Dillingham, AK 99576-0230. Keith A. Weiland is the Egegik and Ugashik Area Management Biologist for the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Commercial Fisheries Division, 333 Raspberry Road, Anchorage, AK 99518. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, and the University of Washington, Fisheries Research Institute for equipment, personnel and funding they provided to help gather escapement data in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Complete Southwest Sport Fish Regulation Booklet
    BRISTOL BAY SALT AND FRESH WATER 12 Major Drainages of Bristol Bay k See the Northern ar Cl Alaska Sport Fish e Regulation Summary Lak Port Alsworth es ag in ra Iliamna D Wood River er age Togiak River iv rain Ungalikthluk Drainage R r D Drainage a ive River Drainage tn R Lake Iliamna a k h a lc h u ic M v / K k a g a Riv Dillingham gnak er Drain h Ala ag s e See the Southcentral u Alaska Sport Fish N Regulation Summary Cape Newenham King Salmon Naknek Rive r Dra B inag ris e to l Ege Ba gik y Ri S ver alt D wa ra te in rs a ge Cape Menshikof U ga sh ik R i Dr ve ain r ag Alaska Peninsula & e Kodiak Island Aleutian Islands See pages 24 - 28 Miles See pages 22 - 23 0 25 50 ARCTIC CHAR AND DOLLY VARDEN LINGCOD General Regulations - Bristol Bay • Season: June 8–October 31 . • No limit . • 3 per day, 3 in possession . Inclusive waters: All fresh waters draining into Bristol ROCKFISH Bay between Cape Menshikof and Cape Newenham, and • Season: November 1–June 7 . • No limit . all salt waters east of a line from Cape Newenham to • 10 per day, 10 in possession. KING CRAB Cape Menshikof . RAINBOW TROUT • Season: June 1–January 31 . The fishing season for all species is open year-round • Season: June 8–October 31 . • Males only: unless otherwise noted below. • 2 per day, 2 in possession, only 1 of which may • 6½ inches or more: 6 per day, 6 in possession.
    [Show full text]