DOCSLIB.ORG

Atiqot — Journal of the Israel Department of Antiquities, English Series (Until 1990; Thereafter, Bilingual)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atiqot — Journal of the Israel Department of Antiquities, English Series (Until 1990; Thereafter, Bilingual) Abbreviations AASOR Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research. ‘Atiqot ‘Atiqot — Journal of the Israel Department of Antiquities, English Series (until 1990; thereafter, bilingual). 'Atiqot (HS) 'Atiqot — Journal of the Israel Department of Antiquities, Hebrew Series. BA Biblical Archaeologist. BAIAS Bulletin of the Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society. BAR Biblical Archaeology Review. BASOR Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. CDSAJ City of David Studies of Ancient Jerusalem. CNJD 2 L. Wexler (ed.), Surveys and Excavations of Caves in the Northern Judean Desert (CNJD) – 1993, Part 2 ('Atiqot 41). Jerusalem 2002. DSD Dead Sea Discoveries. EI Eretz-Israel. ESI Excavations and Surveys in Israel. FDLI The Frontier and the Desert in the Land of Israel (Hebrew). HA Hadashot Arkheologiyot (Hebrew). HA-ESI Hadashot Arkheologiyot; Excavations and Surveys in Israel (online edition: http://www.hadashot-esi.org.il). IEJ Israel Exploration Journal. JSRS Judea and Samaria Research Studies. LA Liber Annuus. MH Mitekufat Haeven: Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society. NEAEHL E. Stern and A. Lewinson-Gilboa (eds.), New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land. Jerusalem 1993. NEAEHL (Sup) E. Stern, H. Geva and A. Paris (eds.), The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land: Supplementary Volume. Jerusalem 2008. NSJ New Studies on Jerusalem. NSAJR New Studies in the Archaeology of Jerusalem and Its Region. PEQ Palestine Exploration Quarterly. RB Revue Biblique. ZDPV Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins. Bibliography Abeles, Z. 1997. Qubur Bani Israil. 'Atiqot 32: 131-134 (Hebrew; English summary: 46*). Abeles, Z. 2002. Region VII: Survey and Excavation of Caves along the Eastern Escarpment of Jebel Qurunṭul. CNJD 2: 109-115. Abu Raya, R. and Zissu, B. 2005. A Second Temple Burial Cave from the Mount of Olives, Jerusalem. 'Atiqot 49: 33-37. Amit, D. and Adler, Y. 2007. Revisiting the 1913-1914 Weill Expedition: Recent Excavations in the City of David. CDSAJ 2: 69-79 (Hebrew). Aizik, N. 2009a. A Winepress, Quarries, a Pit Tomb and a Burial Cave at Khirbet Sirisye (South). In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 62-70 (Hebrew; English summary: 31*). Aizik, N. 2009b. Remains from the Late Roman to Early Islamic Periods near Izzun-‘Atme. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 227-231 (Hebrew; English summary: 52*-53*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2005. H. Mahalhala — A Late Roman Site near ‘Alei-Zahav. JSRS 14: 191-200 (Hebrew; English summary: XVIII-XIX). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2007. A Roman Burial Cave in Khirbet el-Babariyye. JSRS 16: 285-290 (Hebrew; English summary: XIX-XX). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009a. Field Towers and a Winepress Southwest of er-Riḥ an. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 3-10 (Hebrew; English summary: 25*-26*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009b. Agricultural Installations and a Burial Cave to the North of Khirbet Shuweikeh. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 11-21 (Hebrew; English summary: 26*-27*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009c. A Roman Period Burial Cave in Khirbet el-Babariyyeh. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 30-43 (Hebrew; English summary: 29*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009d. Roman and Byzantine Period Remains to the East of Peduel. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 142-155 (Hebrew; English summary: 37*-38*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009e. A Field Tower to the West of Shaked. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 195-196 (Hebrew; English summary: 45*-46*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009f. Field Towers in East Khinanit. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 197-201 (Hebrew; English summary: 46*-47*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009g. An Iron Age IIb Burial Cave to the East of Khirbet Shemsin. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 201-204 (Hebrew; English summary: 47*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009h. Field Towers and Winepresses between Salit and Kokhav Ya’ir. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 209-212 (Hebrew; English summary: 48*-49*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009i. Caves, Winepresses, and a Field Tower to the South and the East of Tsufin. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 212-215 (Hebrew; English summary: 49*-50*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009J. Caves, a Cistern, a Quarry, and a Winepress from the Byzantine Period at Qedumim. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 217-220 (Hebrew; English summary: 50*-51*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009k. Excavations near Alfei Menashe. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 220-224 (Hebrew; English summary: 51*). Aizik, N. and Peleg, Y. 2009l. Field Towers, a Quarry, A Cistern, and a Lime Pit East of Alei Zahav. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 231-235 (Hebrew; English summary: 53*-54*). Amiran, R. and Eitan, A. 1970a. Excavations in the Courtyard of the Citadel, Jerusalem, 1968- 1969 (Preliminary Report). IEJ 20: 9-17. Amiran, R. and Eitan, A. 1970b. Excavations in the Jerusalem Citadel. Qadmoniot 10: 64-66 (Hebrew). Amiran, R. and Eitan, A. 1972. Herod's Palace. IEJ 22: 50-51. Amiran, R. and Eitan, A. 1973. Excavations in the Citadel, Jerusalem, 1968-1969 (Preliminary Report). EI 11: 213-218 (Hebrew). Amiran, R. and Eitan, A. 1975. Excavations in the Jerusalem Citadel. In: Y. Yadin (ed.), Jerusalem Revealed: Archaeology in the Holy City 1968-1974. Jerusalem: 52-54. Amit, D. 1984. The Water Supply to the Alexandrium Fort. In: M. Rosenfeld (ed.), Qarn Sartaba and the Shomron Desert. Tel Aviv: 59-68 (Hebrew). Amit, D. 1994. Ritual Baths (Miqva'ot) from the Second Temple Period in the Hebron Mountains. JSRS 3: 157-189 (Hebrew; English summary: XVIII-XIX). Amit, D. 1999. A Miqveh Complex near Alon Shevut. 'Atiqot 38: 75-90. Amit, D. 2003. The Synagogues of Ḥurbat Ma'on and Ḥurbat 'Anim and the Jewish Settlement in Southern Hebron Hills (Ph.D. dissertation, Hebrew University). Jerusalem (Hebrew; English summary). Amit, D. and Ilan, Z. 1990. The Ancient Synagogue at Ma‘on in Judah. Qadmoniot 91-92: 115- 125 (Hebrew). Amit, D., Ilan, Z. and Mazar, A. 1983. The Roads from Bethel Mountain to Jericho. Qardom 28- 30: 225-230 (Hebrew). Amit, D., Seligman, J. and Zilberbod, I. 2003. The "Monastery of Theodorus and Cyriacus" on the Eastern Slope of Mount Scopus. In: G.C. Bottini, L. Di Segni and L.D. Chrupcała (eds.), One Land — Many Cultures. Jerusalem: 139-148. Amitai-Preiss, N. 2006. An Inscribed Jar Handle from Khirbat Ka‘kul. 'Atiqot 54: 105. Anbar, M. and Na'aman, N. 1986-1987. An Account Tablet of Sheep from Ancient Hebron. Tel Aviv 13-14: 3-12. Arav, R., Di Segni, L. and Kloner, A. 1990. An Eighth Century Monastery near Jerusalem. LA 40: 313-320. Arensburg, B. and Rak, Y. 1975. Skeletal Remains of an Ancient Jewish Population from French Hill, Jerusalem. BASOR 219: 69-71. Ariel, D.T. 1990. Excavations at the City of David 1978-1985, Directed by Yigal Shiloh, Vol. II: Imported Stamped Amphora Handles, Coins, Worked Bone and Ivory, and Glass. Qedem 30. Jerusalem. Ariel, D.T. (ed.) 2000a. Excavations at the City of David 1978-1985, Directed by Yigal Shiloh, Vol. V: Extramural Areas. Qedem 40. Jerusalem. Ariel, D.T. (ed.) 2000b. Excavations at the City of David 1978-1985, Directed by Yigal Shiloh, Vol. VI: Inscriptions. Qedem 41. Jerusalem. Ariel, D.T. 2004. The Coins from Qalandiya. In: Y. Magen, D.T. Ariel, G. BiJovsky, Y. Tzionit and O. Sirkis (eds.), The Land of Benjamin. Judea and Samaria Publications 3. Jerusalem: 145- 177. Ariel, D.T. and De Groot, A. (eds.) 1996. Excavations at the City of David 1978-1985, Directed by Yigal Shiloh, Vol. IV: Various Reports. Qedem 35. Jerusalem. Aronshtam, A. 1997. A Byzantine Church at Khirbet Ḥamad. 'Atiqot 32: 177-182 (Hebrew; English summary: 49*-50*). Aronshtam, A. 2002. Region V: Survey and Excavation of Caves along the Jebel Qurunṭul Escarpment between Wadi Abu SaraJ and Wadi Ḥalq er-Rummana. CNJD 2: 85-95. Aronshtam, E. and Peleg, Y. 2009a. Byzantine Period Farmhouse and Agricultural Installations at Khirbet ed-Duweir. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 124-141 (Hebrew; English summary: 36*-37*). Aronshtam, E. and Peleg, Y. 2009b. A Ritual Bath at Khirbet Abu Ubeida. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Samaria. Judea and Samaria Publications 9. Jerusalem: 216 (Hebrew; English summary: 50*). Aronshtam, E. and Peleg, Y. 2009c. Excavations along the ed-Dhaheriyeh Bypass Road, between otni’el and Meitar. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Benjamin and Judea. Judea and Samaria Publications 10. Jerusalem: 168-174 (Hebrew; English summary: 15*-16*). Aronshtam, E. and Peleg, Y. 2009d. Remains from the Byzantine and Mamluke Periods in Kiryat Arba’, Area 26. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Benjamin and Judea. Judea and Samaria Publications 10. Jerusalem: 281-284 (Hebrew; English summary: 35*-36*). Aronshtam, E. and Peleg, Y. 2009e. An Iron Age IIB Strucure at Metsadot Yehuda. In: I. Yezerski (ed.), Excavations and Discoveries in Benjamin and Judea.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women's Israel Trip ITINERARY
    ITINERARY The Cohen Camps’ Women’s Trip to Israel Led by Adina Cohen April 10-22, 2018 Tuesday April 10 DEPARTURE Departure from Boston (own arrangements) Wednesday April 11 BRUCHIM HABA’AIM-WELCOME TO ISRAEL! . Rendezvous at Ben Gurion airport at 14:10 (or at hotel in Tel Aviv) . Opening Program at the Port of Jaffa, where pilgrims and olim entered the Holy Land for centuries. Welcome Dinner at Café Yafo . Check-in at hotel Overnight: Carlton, Tel Aviv Thursday April 12 A LIGHT UNTO THE NATIONS . Torah Yoga Session . Visit Save a Child’s Heart-a project of Wolfston Hospital, in which Israeli pediatric surgeons provide pro-bono cardiac surery for children from all over Africa and the Middle East. “Shuk Bites” lunch in the Old Jaffa Flea Market . Visit “The Women’s Courtyard” – a designer outlet empowering Arab and Jewish local women . Israeli Folk Dancing interactive program- Follow the beat of Israeli women throughout history and culture and experience Israel’s transformation through dance. Enjoy dinner at the “Liliot” Restaurant, which employs youth at risk. Overnight: Carlton, Tel Aviv Friday April 13 COSMOPOLITAN TEL AVIV . Interactive movement & drum circle workshop with Batya . “Shuk & Cook” program with lunch at the Carmel Market . Stroll through the Nahalat Binyamin weekly arts & crafts fair . Time at leisure to prepare for Shabbat . Candle lighting Cohen Camps Women’s Trip to Israel 2018 Revised 22 Aug 17 Page 1 of 4 . Join Israelis for a unique, musical “Kabbalat Shabbat” with Bet Tefilah Hayisraeli, a liberal, independent, and egalitarian community in Tel Aviv, which is committed to Jewish spirit, culture, and social action.
    [Show full text]
  • View Daily Report
    Israeli Violations' Activities in the oPt 16 May 2016 The daily report highlights the violations behind Israeli home demolitions and demolition threats The Violations are based on in the occupied Palestinian territory, the reports provided by field workers confiscation and razing of lands, the uprooting and\or news sources. and destruction of fruit trees, the expansion of The text is not quoted directly settlements and erection of outposts, the brutality from the sources but is edited for of the Israeli Occupation Army, the Israeli settlers clarity. violence against Palestinian civilians and properties, the erection of checkpoints, the The daily report does not construction of the Israeli segregation wall and necessarily reflect ARIJ’s opinion. the issuance of military orders for the various Israeli purposes. Brutality of the Israeli Occupation Army Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) opened fire at Palestinian farmers while they were working in their land, near the border fence, at the eastern part of Gaza city. (Wafa 16 May 2016) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) stormed and searched dozens of Palestinian houses in Deir Al ‘Asal village, southwest of Hebron city. One of the targeted house is owned by Ibrahim Ash-Shawamrah. (RB2000 16 May 2016) 1 Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) raided and searched four Palestinian houses in Al ‘Asakira village, east of Bethlehem city. The targeted houses are owned by: Adel Ahmed ‘Asakra, Karem ‘Asakra, Nasri ‘Asakra, Nasser ‘Asakra. (RB2000 16 May 2016) Ahmed Omar Abu ‘Amar (32 years) was injured after the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) opened fire at him while he was in Wadi Abu Al Humos area between Al Khas and An-Nu’man villages, east of Bethlehem city.
    [Show full text]
  • Betar and Aelia Capitolina: Symbols of Jewish Suffering Dr
    Betar and Aelia Capitolina: Symbols of Jewish Suffering Dr. Jill Katz Professor of Archaeology and Anthropology, Yeshiva University Of the five specific tragedies that warrant fasting on Tishah b’Av (Mishnah Taanit 4:6), two are related to the Second Jewish Revolt against Rome. The first is the capture of the city of Betar (135 CE) and the second is the plowing of Jerusalem one year later. At first glance, these calamities do not seem to be of the same scale as the destruction of the First and Second Temples. The Jews were neither forcibly removed en masse to a distant land nor was a standing Temple destroyed. Perhaps one could argue that their inclusion within the list was simply due to their still being fresh in people’s memories. Surely, the rabbis of the Mishnaic period would have encountered eyewitnesses to these events and been moved by their recollections. Yet, if this were so, then the Mishnah really need only include one reference to the rebellion. By including two, the Mishnah is teaching us something about the magnitude of this tragedy and the challenges that lay ahead for the Jewish people. Betar If not for the Bar Kokhba rebellion, it is unlikely many people would be familiar with Betar. The ancient city (Khirbet el-Yahud – “ruin of the Jews”) was a modest settlement southwest of Jerusalem in the Judean Hills. Surveys and brief excavations have demonstrated that Betar was first settled during the period of the Shoftim and became a city of moderate importance by the time of Hizkiyahu.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Judah: 18. Temple Interior and Dedication
    Associates for Scriptural Knowledge • P.O. Box 25000, Portland, OR 97298-0990 USA © ASK, March 2019 • All rights reserved • Number 3/19 Telephone: 503 292 4352 • Internet: www.askelm.com • E-Mail: [email protected] How the Siege of Titus Locates the Temple Mount in the City of David by Marilyn Sams, July 2016 Formatted and annotated by David Sielaff, March 2019 This detailed research paper by independent author Marilyn Sams is one of several to follow her 2015 book, The Jerusalem Temple Mount Myth. Her book was inspired by a desire to prove (or disprove) Dr. Ernest Martin’s research in The Temples That Jerusalem Forgot. Ms. Sams wrote a second book in 2017, The Jerusalem Temple Mount: A Compendium of Ancient Descriptions expanding the argument in her first book, itemizing and analyzing 375 ancient descriptions of the Temple, Fort Antonia, and environs, all confirming a Gihon location for God’s Temples.1 Her books and articles greatly advance Dr. Martin’s arguments. David Sielaff, ASK Editor Marilyn Sams: The siege of Titus has been the subject of many books and papers, but always from the false perspective of the Jerusalem Temple Mount’s misidentification.2 The purpose of this paper is to illuminate additional aspects of the siege, in order to show how they cannot reasonably be applied to the current models of the temple and Fort Antonia, but can when the “Temple Mount” is identified as Fort Antonia. Conflicts Between the Rebellious Leaders Prior to the Siege of Titus A clarification of the definition of “Acra” is crucial to understanding the conflicts between John of Gischala and Simon of Giora, two of the rebellious [Jewish] faction leaders, who divided parts of Jerusalem 1 Her second book shows the impossibility of the so-called “Temple Mount” and demonstrate the necessity of a Gihon site of the Temples.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Base of Israel's Colonial Settlements in the West Bank
    Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute The Economic Base of Israel’s Colonial Settlements in the West Bank Nu’man Kanafani Ziad Ghaith 2012 The Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute (MAS) Founded in Jerusalem in 1994 as an independent, non-profit institution to contribute to the policy-making process by conducting economic and social policy research. MAS is governed by a Board of Trustees consisting of prominent academics, businessmen and distinguished personalities from Palestine and the Arab Countries. Mission MAS is dedicated to producing sound and innovative policy research, relevant to economic and social development in Palestine, with the aim of assisting policy-makers and fostering public participation in the formulation of economic and social policies. Strategic Objectives Promoting knowledge-based policy formulation by conducting economic and social policy research in accordance with the expressed priorities and needs of decision-makers. Evaluating economic and social policies and their impact at different levels for correction and review of existing policies. Providing a forum for free, open and democratic public debate among all stakeholders on the socio-economic policy-making process. Disseminating up-to-date socio-economic information and research results. Providing technical support and expert advice to PNA bodies, the private sector, and NGOs to enhance their engagement and participation in policy formulation. Strengthening economic and social policy research capabilities and resources in Palestine. Board of Trustees Ghania Malhees (Chairman), Ghassan Khatib (Treasurer), Luay Shabaneh (Secretary), Mohammad Mustafa, Nabeel Kassis, Radwan Shaban, Raja Khalidi, Rami Hamdallah, Sabri Saidam, Samir Huleileh, Samir Abdullah (Director General). Copyright © 2012 Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute (MAS) P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2014 Al-Malih Shaqed Kh
    Salem Zabubah Ram-Onn Rummanah The West Bank Ta'nak Ga-Taybah Um al-Fahm Jalameh / Mqeibleh G Silat 'Arabunah Settlements and the Separation Barrier al-Harithiya al-Jalameh 'Anin a-Sa'aidah Bet She'an 'Arrana G 66 Deir Ghazala Faqqu'a Kh. Suruj 6 kh. Abu 'Anqar G Um a-Rihan al-Yamun ! Dahiyat Sabah Hinnanit al-Kheir Kh. 'Abdallah Dhaher Shahak I.Z Kfar Dan Mashru' Beit Qad Barghasha al-Yunis G November 2014 al-Malih Shaqed Kh. a-Sheikh al-'Araqah Barta'ah Sa'eed Tura / Dhaher al-Jamilat Um Qabub Turah al-Malih Beit Qad a-Sharqiyah Rehan al-Gharbiyah al-Hashimiyah Turah Arab al-Hamdun Kh. al-Muntar a-Sharqiyah Jenin a-Sharqiyah Nazlat a-Tarem Jalbun Kh. al-Muntar Kh. Mas'ud a-Sheikh Jenin R.C. A'ba al-Gharbiyah Um Dar Zeid Kafr Qud 'Wadi a-Dabi Deir Abu Da'if al-Khuljan Birqin Lebanon Dhaher G G Zabdah לבנון al-'Abed Zabdah/ QeiqisU Ya'bad G Akkabah Barta'ah/ Arab a-Suweitat The Rihan Kufeirit רמת Golan n 60 הגולן Heights Hadera Qaffin Kh. Sab'ein Um a-Tut n Imreihah Ya'bad/ a-Shuhada a a G e Mevo Dotan (Ganzour) n Maoz Zvi ! Jalqamus a Baka al-Gharbiyah r Hermesh Bir al-Basha al-Mutilla r e Mevo Dotan al-Mughayir e t GNazlat 'Isa Tannin i a-Nazlah G d Baqah al-Hafira e The a-Sharqiya Baka al-Gharbiyah/ a-Sharqiyah M n a-Nazlah Araba Nazlat ‘Isa Nazlat Qabatiya הגדה Westהמערבית e al-Wusta Kh.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem: City of Dreams, City of Sorrows
    1 JERUSALEM: CITY OF DREAMS, CITY OF SORROWS More than ever before, urban historians tell us that global cities tend to look very much alike. For U.S. students. the“ look alike” perspective makes it more difficult to empathize with and to understand cultures and societies other than their own. The admittedly superficial similarities of global cities with U.S. ones leads to misunderstandings and confusion. The multiplicity of cybercafés, high-rise buildings, bars and discothèques, international hotels, restaurants, and boutique retailers in shopping malls and multiplex cinemas gives these global cities the appearances of familiarity. The ubiquity of schools, university campuses, signs, streetlights, and urban transportation systems can only add to an outsider’s “cultural and social blindness.” Prevailing U.S. learning goals that underscore American values of individualism, self-confidence, and material comfort are, more often than not, obstacles for any quick study or understanding of world cultures and societies by visiting U.S. student and faculty.1 Therefore, international educators need to look for and find ways in which their students are able to look beyond the veneer of the modern global city through careful program planning and learning strategies that seek to affect the students in their “reading and learning” about these fertile centers of liberal learning. As the students become acquainted with the streets, neighborhoods, and urban centers of their global city, their understanding of its ways and habits is embellished and enriched by the walls, neighborhoods, institutions, and archaeological sites that might otherwise cause them their “cultural and social blindness.” Jerusalem is more than an intriguing global historical city.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme of the Seminar
    Seminar and Workshop Announcement and Invitation Professional Certification for Israeli Conservators cA ollaboration of the key Israeli heritage stakeholders Organised by The Society for the Conservation and Preservation of Israeli Cultural Property, The Israel Antiquities Authority and UNESCO‐Israel sponsored by Israel Ministry of Culture and Sport ‐Museums Dept; Israel Foreign Ministry : Haifa University; ICOMOS‐ Israel; Society for Preservation of Israel Heritage Sites; Israel Nature and Parks Authority; ICOM‐Israel; Israel Museum, Jerusalem; Eretz Israel Museum; Israel Archives and Information Association; Israeli Society of United Architects, Hosted by the Tel Aviv Museum of Art Monday August 2nd 2010 10:00 – 15:00 8:30: Registration 9:30 Welcoming speeches 10:00‐12:00 Morning session‐ Chaired by James Snyder, Director of the Israel Museum, Jerusalem • Dr. Stan Lester ‐ Specialist in professional accreditation, chief designer of the ICON accreditation scheme, Director Stan Lester Developments Education and Training Sytems – Becoming a qualifying profession • Prof. Amos Notea – Head of Quality and Reliability Engineering in Electronics Program, Kinneret College, expert in certification systems in industry. Establishment and management of a professional certification system in Israel • Mr. Ingval Maxwell OBE –Consultant in Architectural Conservation Pan‐professional Accreditation in UK Building Conservation ‐ Background, Development and Operation • Mrs. Susan Bradshaw ACR ‐ ICON Accreditation Manager Operating PACR Accreditation in the UK 12:00 Break 13:00 – 15:00 Afternoon Session – Chaired by Prof. Amos Notea , Kinneret College • Dr. Chris Woods ACR‐ Chairman, ICON Professional Standards Committee, Director, Conservation Ltd ʹWhy Accredit Conservators? ‐ assessing the impact of accreditation and registration in the UK • Panel Session – chaired by Gideon Koren Adv.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah Weekly
    בס״ד TORAH WEEKLYParshat Va’etchanan 22 - 28 July, 2018 A GODLY bilitation process after the beds, calling out, “Shema 10 - 16 Av, 5778 liberation of some of the de- Yisrael Hashem Elokeinu, SPARK PLUG ath camps. While there, they Hashem Echad - Hear, Israel, Torah: During the Second were told that many Jewish the Lord is our God, the Lord Deuteronomy 3:23 - 7:11 World War, countless Jewish children had been placed in is One!” parents gave their precious a monastery in Alsace-Lor- As they did this, child raine. Without hesitation, the after child sat up in their beds Haftorah: children to Christian neigh- bors and orphanages in the rabbis went there to reclaim and began to recite the Shema Isaiah 40:1 - 26 hope that these would provide them. along with the rabbi. Some When they appro- even raised their hands to TORAH STUDIES safe havens for them. The pa- ached the priest in charge, cover their eyes, as they had We have many rents hoped that they, or their relatives, would take these they asked that the Jewish been taught by their mothers. Judaic topics for you to children back if they survi- children be released into the They remembered study. We will provide ved the war. The few parents rabbis’ care. “I’m sorry,” the their mothers and fathers reci- the material and cour- who did not perish in the priest responded, “but there ting the Shema with them as ses. Please write to us Holocaust, and were able to is no way of knowing whi- they put them to sleep when for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Temple Mount in the Herodian Period (37 BC–70 A.D.)
    The Temple Mount in the Herodian Period (37 BC–70 A.D.) Leen Ritmeyer • 08/03/2018 This post was originally published on Leen Ritmeyer’s website Ritmeyer Archaeological Design. It has been republished with permission. Visit the website to learn more about the history of the Temple Mount and follow Ritmeyer Archaeological Design on Facebook. Following on from our previous drawing, the Temple Mount during the Hellenistic and Hasmonean periods, we now examine the Temple Mount during the Herodian period. This was, of course, the Temple that is mentioned in the New Testament. Herod extended the Hasmonean Temple Mount in three directions: north, west and south. At the northwest corner he built the Antonia Fortress and in the south, the magnificent Royal Stoa. In 19 B.C. the master-builder, King Herod the Great, began the most ambitious building project of his life—the rebuilding of the Temple and the Temple Mount in lavish style. To facilitate this, he undertook a further expansion of the Hasmonean Temple Mount by extending it on three sides, to the north, west and south. Today’s Temple Mount boundaries still reflect this enlargement. The cutaway drawing below allows us to recap on the development of the Temple Mount so far: King Solomon built the First Temple on the top of Mount Moriah which is visible in the center of this drawing. This mountain top can be seen today, inside the Islamic Dome of the Rock. King Hezekiah built a square Temple Mount (yellow walls) around the site of the Temple, which he also renewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Yael Bartana 1970 Born in Kfar Yehezkel, Israel Currently Lives and Works in Amsterdam and Berlin
    Yael Bartana 1970 born in Kfar Yehezkel, Israel currently lives and works in Amsterdam and Berlin Education 2000–01 Rijksakademie van Beeldende Kunsten, Amsterdam, NL 1999 MFA studies, School of Visual Arts, New York, US 1992–96 BFA, The Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design, Jerusalem, IL Prizes 2010 Artes Mundi 4, Wales, UK Principal Prize by the International Jury and the Prize of the Ecumenical Jury at the Oberhausen Short Film Festival, DE Häagendaismo, Madrid, ES 2009 Prix Dazibao, Montreal, CAN 2007 Gottesdiener Foundation Israeli Art Prize 2006, IL 2006 Recipient of the 2006 Ministry of Science, Culture and Sport Prize, Israel, IL 2005 Dorothea von Stetten-Kunstpreis, Kunstmuseum Bonn, DE Prix de Rome, 2nd award winner, Rijksakademie, Amsterdam, NL 2003 Anselm Kiefer Prize, The Wolf Foundation, IL 1996 The Samuel Prize, for the video / sound installation ‘Ant-Bulb, Bezalel Academy of Art and Design, Jerusalem, IL Residencies / Fellowships / Stipends 2009 Center for Curatorial Studies, Bard Collage, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, US 2007 Fonds BKVB, Amsterdam, NL 2006 Foksal Gallery Foundation, Warsaw, PL 2005 Platform Garanti, Istanbul, TR 2003 Rooseum – Center for Contemporary Art, Malmo, SE 2002 Jerusalem Center for Visual Arts (JCVA), Jerusalem, IL 2001 NUFFIC, NL Rijksakademie van beeldende kunsten / Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, NL 2000 Stichting Schürmann-Krant, NL Stichting Trustfonds Rijksakademie, Amsterdam, NL Gallery representations Annet Gelink Gallery, Amsterdam, NL Sommer Contemporary Art, Tel Aviv, IL
    [Show full text]
  • The Walls of Jerusalem
    Palestine Exploration Quarterly ISSN: 0031-0328 (Print) 1743-1301 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ypeq20 The Walls of Jerusalem C. W. Wilson To cite this article: C. W. Wilson (1905) The Walls of Jerusalem, Palestine Exploration Quarterly, 37:3, 231-243, DOI: 10.1179/peq.1905.37.3.231 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/peq.1905.37.3.231 Published online: 20 Nov 2013. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 13 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ypeq20 Download by: [UNSW Library] Date: 23 April 2016, At: 06:55 231 THE 'VALLS OF JERUSALEM. By Major-Gen. Sir C. W. WILSON, K.C.B., l).C.L., F.R.S. 1. General Remarks; 2. The City Walls in A.D. 70. 1. Gene"'alRernarks.-Before attempting to investigate the questions connected with the ancient walls of Jerusalem, some consideration of the general principles that governed the construction of fortifica- tions in early times is not only desirable, but necessary. Jerusalem was strongly fortified at all periods of its· history, but there is .no reason to suppose that there was anything unusual in the trace and construction of its walls. The defences of Jebus could not have differed greatly from those of other Canaanite cities; the walls of David and his successors, which Nehemiah restored, ,vere constructed probably in accordance with Phrenician systems of fortification; and the citadels and ,valls built ·by Herod the Great and Herod Agrippa were almost certainly Greek or Greco-Roman in character.
    [Show full text]