Objective: to Examine the Importance of Common Sense, and the Signing of the Declaration of Independence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Objective: To examine the importance of Common Sense, and the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Common Sense (1776) - Common Sense was a pamphlet written by Thomas Paine that helped convince thousands of colonists to support independence from Great Britain. Video: Thomas Paine and Common Sense (4:48) Thomas Paine Declaration of Independence - In June of 1776, the Continental Congress agreed that a Declaration of Independence needed to be written. Liberty`s Kids: "The First Fourth of July" 10:51 (1/2) - On July 4, 1776, the delegates accepted the Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson. John Trumbull's "Declaration of Independence”, 1817 Declaration of Independence – 3 Main Parts 1 – All people have equal rights. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” 2 – Great Britain had treated the colonists wrongfully. 3 – The colonies were now an independent country known as the United States of America. Declaration of Independence (3:49) Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Site of the 1776 signing of the United States Declaration of Independence. Reading of the Declaration of Independence from the East balcony of the Old State House, Boston, Massachusetts July 18, 1776. Pulling Down the Statue of King George III. A depiction of the Sons of Liberty destroying the statue after the Declaration was read by George Washington to citizens and his troops in New York City on July 9, 1776. 1890's caricature of Americans kicking out the British. Uncle Sam looks on as a youthful George Washington kicks John Bull across the water, out of the United States and back to England. Liberty`sJefferson Kids: "The Memorial, First Fourth Washington, of July" D.C. 10:51 (2/2) "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free… …Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them." - Thomas Jefferson .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Discover Woman American History
soei D g American Democracy et. 07 How Women Shaped American Life and Culture Prepared by Susan Sullivan Lagon,Ph.D., Historian, The Jefferson, Washington, DC The Jefferson, Washington, DC • 1200 16th St. NW • Washington DC, 20036 1 The Jefferson, Washington, DC • 1200 16th St. NW • Washington DC, 20036 How Women Shaped American Life and Culture Prepared by Susan Sullivan Lagon, Ph.D., Historian, The Jefferson, Washington, DC John Adams, whose bust is opposite Thomas Jefferson’s in the lobby, was a faithful correspondent with his wife Abigail while she remained in Massachusetts. In a famous letter from Abigail to her husband on March 31, 1776, she wrote: “I long to hear that you have declared an independency. And, by the way, in the new code of laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands. Remember, all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation.” Day One Walking Tour From the hotel, head south on 16th St. to Lafayette Square. The large building at H St. and Madison Place is Dolley Madison House. The stately home was built in 1820 by Congressman Richard Cutts who was married to Dolley Madison’s sister Anna.
[Show full text]
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, William Howard, ed. The Eye of Thomas Jefferson. Blake, Channing. “The Early Interiors of Carrère and Hastings.” Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1981. The Magazine Antiques 110 (1976): 344–351. Aikman, Lonnelle. We, the People: The Story of the United Blum, John M., et. al., eds. The National Experience. New States Capitol. Washington: U. S. Capitol Historical Society, 1991. York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1963. Alex, William. Calvert Vaux: Architect & Planner. New York: Bowling, Kenneth R. Creating the Federal City, 1774–1800: Ink, Inc., 1994. Potomac Fever. Washington: The American Institute of Archi- tects Press, 1988. Alexander, R. L. “The Grand Federal Edifice.” Documentary Editing 9 (June 1987): 13–17. Bowling, Kenneth R., and Helen E. Veit., eds. The Diary of William Maclay and Other Notes On Senate Debates. Balti- Allen, William C. “In The Greatest Solemn Dignity”: The Capi- more: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988. tol’s Four Cornerstones. Washington: Government Printing Bristow, Ian C. Interior House-Painting Colours and Tech- Office, 1995. nology 1615–1840. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996. ———. “‘Seat of Broils, Confusion, and Squandered Thousands’: Brown, Glenn. “Dr. William Thornton, Architect.” Architectural Building the Capitol, 1790–1802.” The United States Capitol: Record 6 (1896): 53–70. Designing and Decorating a National Icon. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2000. ———. History of the United States Capitol. 2 vols. Washing- ton: Government Printing Office, 1900, 1902. ———. The Dome of the United States Capitol: An Architec- tural History. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1992. ———. Memories: A Winning Crusade to Revive George Washington’s Vision of a Capital City.
[Show full text]
P.S.: You Had Better Remove the Records: Early Federal Archives
“P.S.: You had better remove the records” Early Federal Archives and the Burning of Washington during the War of 1812 By Jessie Kratz hen British troops began to advance toward And so clerks packed Wthe United States’ new capital of Wash such things as the books and ington in the summer of 1814, it was clear that papers of the State Department; government leaders had not prepared an adequate unpublished secret journals of defense for the city and its government buildings. Congress; George Washington’s The British navy already had control of nearby Chesa commission and correspondence; peake Bay and some 4,500 troops in the port town of the Articles of Confederation; papers Benedict, Maryland—poised for an attack on the capital. of the Continental Congress; and all the Despite the show of force, the secretary of war, treaties, laws, and correspondence dating John Armstrong, was convinced the British were back to 1789. more interested in the port of Baltimore than in Along with these early records, the clerks Washington, which then had only 8,200 residents. also bagged up the Charters of Freedom—the Secretary of State James Monroe felt differently collective term for the Declaration of Indepen and met with President James Madison to discuss dence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. the enemy’s intentions. Then Monroe himself rode And so these three documents began a long jour by horse, accompanied by cavalry, into southern ney as the War of 1812 raged. Maryland to scout the situation. The journey would not end until 1952, when Upon seeing the British advancing toward all three were placed together, side by side, in special Washington, Monroe dispatched a note to Presi encasements in the Rotunda of the National Archives dent Madison.
[Show full text]
The War of 1812 and American Self-Image
Educational materials developed through the Howard County History Labs Program, a partnership between the Howard County Public School System and the UMBC Center for History Education. The War of 1812 and American Self-Image Historical Thinking Skills Assessed: Sourcing, Close Reading, Corroboration Author/School/System: Emily Savopoulos, Howard County Public School System, Maryland Course: United States History Level: Middle Task Question: How did Americans' opinion of the United States change during the War of 1812? Learning Outcome: Students will be able to describe the change in opinion of Americans toward the United States during the War of 1812 based on a close reading and corroboration of two editorial cartoons. Standards Alignment: Common Core Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies RH.6-8.1 Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources. RH.6-8.2 Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary of the source distinct from prior knowledge or opinions. RH.6-8.7 Integrate visual information (e.g. charts, graphs, photographs, videos, or maps) with other information in print and digital texts. National History Standards Era 3: Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s) Standard 3: The institutions and practices of government created during the Revolution and how they were revised between 1787 and 1815 to create the foundation of the American political system based on the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies Standards D2.His.2.6-8 Classify series of historical events and developments as examples of change and/or continuity.
[Show full text]
Building Stones of the National Mall
The Geological Society of America Field Guide 40 2015 Building stones of the National Mall Richard A. Livingston Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Carol A. Grissom Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746, USA Emily M. Aloiz John Milner Associates Preservation, 3200 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22207, USA ABSTRACT This guide accompanies a walking tour of sites where masonry was employed on or near the National Mall in Washington, D.C. It begins with an overview of the geological setting of the city and development of the Mall. Each federal monument or building on the tour is briefly described, followed by information about its exterior stonework. The focus is on masonry buildings of the Smithsonian Institution, which date from 1847 with the inception of construction for the Smithsonian Castle and continue up to completion of the National Museum of the American Indian in 2004. The building stones on the tour are representative of the development of the Ameri can dimension stone industry with respect to geology, quarrying techniques, and style over more than two centuries. Details are provided for locally quarried stones used for the earliest buildings in the capital, including A quia Creek sandstone (U.S. Capitol and Patent Office Building), Seneca Red sandstone (Smithsonian Castle), Cockeysville Marble (Washington Monument), and Piedmont bedrock (lockkeeper's house). Fol lowing improvement in the transportation system, buildings and monuments were constructed with stones from other regions, including Shelburne Marble from Ver mont, Salem Limestone from Indiana, Holston Limestone from Tennessee, Kasota stone from Minnesota, and a variety of granites from several states.
[Show full text]
The Thomas Jefferson Memorial, Washington
JL, JLornclt ),//,.,on Wn*ooio/ memorial ACTION PUBLICATIONS Alexandria, Va. JL" llo*oo )"ff",.", TLln^o,io/ This great National Memorial to the aurhor of the Declaration of Indepen- dence and the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, First Secretary of State and Third President of the United States, possesses mlny of the qualities ascribed to the brilliant revolutionary leader in whose memory it has been dedicated by a grateful Nation It is magnificent-as Jefferson's chrracter was magnificent. Simple as his Democracy. Aesthetic as l.ris thoughts. Courageous as his chempion- ship of the righrs of man. The memorial structure is in itself a tribute to Jefferson's artistic tastes and preference and a mark of respect for his architectural and scientific achievements. A farmer by choice, a lawyer by profession, and an architect by avocation, JelTer- son \r,as awed by the remarkable beauty of design and noble proportions of the Pantheon in Rome and foilou,ed irs scheme in the major architectururl accom- plishments of his oq,n life Its inlluence is evident in his ovu'n home at Monticello and in the Rotunda of the University of Virginia at Cl.rarkrttesville, which he designed. The monumental portico complimenrs Jellerson's design for the Yir- ginia State Capitol at Richmond. h But it is not alone the architectural splendor or the beiruty of its settir,g ',irhich makes this memcrial one of the mosr revered American patriotic shrines. In it the American people find the spirit of the living Jefferson and the fervor which inspired their colonial forbears to break, by force of erms, the ties which bound them to tyrannical overlords; to achieve not only nltional independence.
[Show full text]
Defining John Bull: Political Caricature and National Identity in Late Georgian England
Published on Reviews in History (https://reviews.history.ac.uk) Defining John Bull: Political Caricature and National Identity in Late Georgian England Review Number: 360 Publish date: Saturday, 1 November, 2003 Author: Tamara Hunt ISBN: 1840142685 Date of Publication: 2003 Price: £57.50 Pages: 452pp. Publisher: Ashgate Publisher url: https://www.ashgate.com/default.aspx?page=637&calcTitle=1&title_id=1454&edition_id=1525 Place of Publication: Aldershot Reviewer: David Johnson The period between 1760 and 1820 was the golden age of British pictorial satire. But only in the last 20 years have the artists and their work attracted serious study in their own right. Rather than being seen as attractive but essentially incidental illustrations for the study of British society and politics, political and social caricatures are now analysed in depth as both a reflection of, and sometimes a formative influence upon, public opinion. Increasingly their propagandist role as tools in the hands of national government or opposition is recognised. The creators of what are often highly sophisticated and intricate images are now regarded as serious artists, and the importance of their place in the political and social world of the time recognised. The setting up of a national centre in Britain for the study of cartoons and caricature at the University of Kent at Canterbury (see http://library.kent.ac.uk/cartoons [2]) and the major James Gillray exhibition at the Tate Gallery in 2001 (see http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/exhibitions/gillray/ [3]) have set the agenda, while Diana Donald's The Age of Caricature: Satirical Prints in the Reign of George III (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1996) is currently the seminal text.
[Show full text]
John Bull's Other Ireland
John Bull’s Other Ireland: Manchester-Irish Identities and a Generation of Performance Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors O'Sullivan, Brendan M. Citation O'Sullivan, B. M. (2017). John Bull’s Other Ireland: Manchester- Irish identities and a generation of performance (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, United Kingdom. Publisher University of Chester Download date 28/09/2021 05:41:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/620650 John Bull’s Other Ireland Manchester-Irish Identities and a Generation of Performance Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Chester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Brendan Michael O’Sullivan May 2017 Declaration The material being presented for examination is my own work and has not been submitted for an award of this, or any other HEI except in minor particulars which are explicitly noted in the body of the thesis. Where research pertaining to the thesis has been undertaken collaboratively, the nature of my individual contribution has been made explicit. ii Table of Contents Preface .......................................................................................................... 2 Locating Theory and Method in Performance Studies and Ethnography. .. 2 Chapter 1 ..................................................................................................... 12 Forgotten but not Gone ............................................................................ 12 Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Declaration of Independence Signed Date Thomas Jefferson
Declaration Of Independence Signed Date Thomas Jefferson Rhizopod and gassier Webster desquamate, but Sterne inappositely plebeianize her psilocin. Which Jerrie ruralised so extortionately that Francis requote her logion? Hebert is heterophyllous: she outdriven gey and suberises her arytaenoids. He is that the leaderboard and national library director lillian bradshaw argued for daily stanford news, burned his legal career that independence declaration of men Written in June 1776 Thomas Jefferson's draft start the Declaration of. Meet Mary Katherine Goddard the only mortal who signed. The plot important and dramatic statement comes near right end but these United Colonies are and of right ought to gather Free and Independent States It declares a good break with Britain and thunder King and claims the powers of an independent country. This Fourth of July America needs to surrender its founding. Is the Declaration of Independence in quotes? Two withstand the signers would become president Thomas Jefferson and John Adams. At a prompt date bear in the nineteenth century Jefferson indicated in the. Who did Thomas Jefferson quote add the Declaration of Independence? As Thomas Jefferson explained in sleep Summary work of the Rights of British America 1774. Show will have long bedazzled the declaration of independence thomas jefferson completed. Declaration inspire future security of humidity, signed declaration of jefferson and our fortunes and in their independence, dar library director lillian bradshaw argued for his son could jefferson was agreed on. As Thomas Jefferson and John Adams never signed the Constitution. Who owns the original Declaration of Independence? Sign the national parks and shipbuilder, he was intact during july fun abilities of independence declaration of five of.
[Show full text]
John Trumbull of the Signing of the Declaration of Independence
Bicentennial Moment #2: the Naming of Livingston County, New York Livingston County was named in honor of Chancellor Robert R. Livingston (1746-1813), a man who never resided Livingston County, but who was among the Founding Fathers of the United States of America. Livingston was the eldest son of Judge Robert Livingston (1718–1775) and Margaret (née Beekman) Livingston, uniting two wealthy Hudson River Valley families. Among his many contributions, Livingston was a member of the Second Continental Congress, co-author of the Declaration of Independence, and in 1789 he administered the oath of office to President George Washington. As a member of the Committee of Five that drafted the Declaration of Independence, Livingston worked alongside Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Roger Sherman. A regional and national luminary, Livingston served as Chancellor of the Supreme Court of New York (1777 to 1801). As the United States Minister to France from 1801 to 1804, he was one of the key figures in negotiating the Louisiana Purchase with Napoleon Bonaparte, a sale that marked a turning point in the relationship between the two nations. During his time as U.S. Minister to France, Livingston met Robert Fulton, with whom he developed the first viable steamboat, the North River Steamboat, whose home port was at the Livingston family home of Clermont Manor in Clermont, New York. In addition to the naming of Livingston County in his honor, Robert R. Livingston's legacy lives on in numerous ways including a statue commissioned by the State of New York and placed in the National Statuary Hall at the U.S.
[Show full text]
Founding Fathers" in American History Dissertations
EVOLVING OUR HEROES: AN ANALYSIS OF FOUNDERS AND "FOUNDING FATHERS" IN AMERICAN HISTORY DISSERTATIONS John M. Stawicki A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2019 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Ruth Herndon Scott Martin © 2019 John Stawicki All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor This thesis studies scholarly memory of the American founders and “Founding Fathers” via inclusion in American dissertations. Using eighty-one semi-randomly and diversely selected founders as case subjects to examine and trace how individual, group, and collective founder interest evolved over time, this thesis uniquely analyzes 20th and 21st Century Revolutionary American scholarship on the founders by dividing it five distinct periods, with the most recent period coinciding with “founders chic.” Using data analysis and topic modeling, this thesis engages three primary historiographic questions: What founders are most prevalent in Revolutionary scholarship? Are social, cultural, and “from below” histories increasing? And if said histories are increasing, are the “New Founders,” individuals only recently considered vital to the era, posited by these histories outnumbering the Top Seven Founders (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine) in founder scholarship? The thesis concludes that the Top Seven Founders have always dominated founder dissertation scholarship, that social, cultural, and “from below” histories are increasing, and that social categorical and “New Founder” histories are steadily increasing as Top Seven Founder studies are slowly decreasing, trends that may shift the Revolutionary America field away from the Top Seven Founders in future years, but is not yet significantly doing so.
[Show full text]
Durham Research Online
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Durham Research Online Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 26 April 2019 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: O'Donoghue, Aoife (2018) '`The admixture of feminine weakness and susceptibility' : gendered personications of the state in international law.', Melbourne journal of international law., 19 (1). pp. 227-258. Further information on publisher's website: https://law.unimelb.edu.au/mjil/issues/issue-archive/191 Publisher's copyright statement: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 http://dro.dur.ac.uk ‘THE ADMIXTURE OF FEMININE WEAKNESS AND SUSCEPTIBILITY’: GENDERED PERSONIFICATIONS OF THE STATE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW Gendered Personifications of the State AOIFE O’DONOGHUE* 19th century international law textbooks were infused with the gendered personification of states. Legal academics, such as Johann Casper Bluntschli, John Westlake, Robert Phillimore and James Lorimer, relied on gendered personification to ascribe attributes to states.
[Show full text]