2010 September
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pine Island Ridge Management Plan
Pine Island Ridge Conservation Management Plan Broward County Parks and Recreation May 2020 Update of 1999 Management Plan Table of Contents A. General Information ..............................................................................................................3 B. Natural and Cultural Resources ...........................................................................................8 C. Use of the Property ..............................................................................................................13 D. Management Activities ........................................................................................................18 E. Works Cited ..........................................................................................................................29 List of Tables Table 1. Management Goals…………………………………………………………………21 Table 2. Estimated Costs……………………………………………………………….........27 List of Attachments Appendix A. Pine Island Ridge Lease 4005……………………………………………... A-1 Appendix B. Property Deeds………….............................................................................. B-1 Appendix C. Pine Island Ridge Improvements………………………………………….. C-1 Appendix D. Conservation Lands within 10 miles of Pine Island Ridge Park………….. D-1 Appendix E. 1948 Aerial Photograph……………………………………………………. E-1 Appendix F. Development Agreement………………………………………………….. F-1 Appendix G. Plant Species Observed at Pine Island Ridge……………………………… G-1 Appendix H. Wildlife Species Observed at Pine Island Ridge ……... …………………. H-1 Appendix -
FLORIDA GOLDEN ASTER Chrysopsis Floridana
FLORIDA GOLDEN ASTER Chrysopsis floridana Above: Photo of Florida Golden Aster flower cluster. Photo courtesy of Laurie Markham. Left: Photo of Florida Golden Aster plant. Photo courtesy of Laurie Markham. FAMILY: Asteraceae (Aster family) STATUS: Endangered (Federal Register, May 16, 1986) DESCRIPTION AND REPRODUCTION: Young plants of this perennial herb form rosettes with leaves that are covered with dense, white, short-wooly hairs. Upright stems that grow from the rosettes are 0.3-0.4 meters (1-1.5 feet) tall, with closely-spaced, obovate-elliptic, hairy leaves. The leaves are nearly as large at the top of the stem as at the bottom. The flower heads are arranged in a more or less flat-topped cluster. Each head is slightly over 2.5 centimeters (1 inch) in diameter. Both the central disc and the rays are yellow. This plant is short-lived, and reproduces entirely by seeds. Its seeds are apparently dispersed primarily by the wind. RANGE AND POPULATION LEVEL: Florida golden aster is currently known from Hardee, Hillsborough, Manatee and Pinellas Counties, Florida. 2004 surveys on Hillsborough County lands have discovered several new populations (Cox et al. 2004). Additional survey will be conducted in 2005 on additional Hillsborough and Manatee Counties land. Systematic surveys should be continued and De Soto and Sarasota Counties should be included in this search. Historic sites include Long Key (St. Petersburg Beach) in Pinellas County, and Bradenton Beach and Bradenton in Manatee County. HABITAT: The species grows in open, sunny areas. It occurs in sand pine-evergreen oak scrub vegetation on excessively-drained fine white sand. -
Cocoa Beach Maritime Hammock Preserve Management Plan
MANAGEMENT PLAN Cocoa Beach’s Maritime Hammock Preserve City of Cocoa Beach, Florida Florida Communities Trust Project No. 03 – 035 –FF3 Adopted March 18, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………. 1 II. Purpose …………………………………………………………….……. 2 a. Future Uses ………….………………………………….…….…… 2 b. Management Objectives ………………………………………….... 2 c. Major Comprehensive Plan Directives ………………………..….... 2 III. Site Development and Improvement ………………………………… 3 a. Existing Physical Improvements ……….…………………………. 3 b. Proposed Physical Improvements…………………………………… 3 c. Wetland Buffer ………...………….………………………………… 4 d. Acknowledgment Sign …………………………………..………… 4 e. Parking ………………………….………………………………… 5 f. Stormwater Facilities …………….………………………………… 5 g. Hazard Mitigation ………………………………………………… 5 h. Permits ………………………….………………………………… 5 i. Easements, Concessions, and Leases …………………………..… 5 IV. Natural Resources ……………………………………………..……… 6 a. Natural Communities ………………………..……………………. 6 b. Listed Animal Species ………………………….…………….……. 7 c. Listed Plant Species …………………………..…………………... 8 d. Inventory of the Natural Communities ………………..………….... 10 e. Water Quality …………..………………………….…..…………... 10 f. Unique Geological Features ………………………………………. 10 g. Trail Network ………………………………….…..………..……... 10 h. Greenways ………………………………….…..……………..……. 11 i Adopted March 18, 2004 V. Resources Enhancement …………………………..…………………… 11 a. Upland Restoration ………………………..………………………. 11 b. Wetland Restoration ………………………….…………….………. 13 c. Invasive Exotic Plants …………………………..…………………... 13 d. Feral -
Florida Golden Aster Chrysopsis (=Heterotheca) Floridana Small
Florida Golden Aster Chrysopsis (=Heterotheca) floridana Small he Florida golden aster is a perennial herb in the Federal Status: Endangered (May 16, 1986) aster family with a distribution limited to a few Critical Habitat: None Designated Tcounties in west-central Florida. The Florida golden Florida Status: Endangered aster occurs in sand pine and oak scrub or in disturbed areas at the edges of scrub. Recovery Plan Status: Contribution (May 1999) This account represents South Floridas contribution to Geographic Coverage: South Florida the existing recovery plan for the Florida golden aster (FWS 1988). Figure 1. County distribution of the Florida golden aster. Description Chrysopsis floridana is a perennial herb with stems that are woody toward the base and non-woody above. The plants have basal rosettes (clusters of leaves at ground level) with leaves 4 to 10 cm long, 1.5 to 2.0 cm wide; the leaves of the rosette are densely short-wooly pubescent. The stem leaves are nearly the same size from the top to the bottom of the stem; they are obovate-elliptic, slightly clasping the stem, entire, and densely short-wooly pubescent. The flower heads are grouped into a more or less flat-topped cluster of 1 to 25 heads at the top of the stem. Each head is slightly over 2.5 cm in diameter. Both the central disc and the rays are golden yellow. C. floridana is distinguished from other members of its genus by its perennial habit, the woodiness of its stems, the wooliness and the shape of the stem and the leaves, and the way the flower heads are arranged in a flat-topped cluster (Semple 1981, Wunderlin et al. -
Suncoast Grapevine
www.ficus.usf.edu/orgs/suncoastwww.suncoastnps.org The Suncoast Grapevine Newsletter of the Suncoast Native Plant Society, Inc. Volume 28 Number 5 May 2011 Chrysopsis floridana Restoration Efforts: Bok Tower Gardens, a National Historic Landmark Presented by Cindy Campbell Wednesday, May 18 @ 7pm Hillsborough County Extension Service Ms. Cindy Campbell will be talking about the work her team at Bok Tower Gardens has done reintroducing one of the most interesting rare endemics that is found right here in central Florida, Chrysopsis floridana. This native plant is a beautiful aster with frosty white hairs on its foliage that gives it protection from the harsh conditions of the white sand scrubs it is found in. While working at Bok Tower Gardens , Cindy has learned very much about the growing characteristics of Chrysopsis floridana as well as many other species of endangered plants in Florida. Her team has pioneered many growing techniques and plant reestablishment techniques of rare plants. Her work will ensure that the population of these beautiful plants will continue to improve. Cindy organized efforts along with our Suncoast chapter and numerous other groups to plant over 1,000 Chrysopsis floridana plants at SWFWMD’s Southfork Tract in Manatee County. Later, our chapter participated in monitoring the condition of the restoration. Detailed data of health, failure rate, and size were recorded. This monitoring program is to continue for five years. Cindy is currently the rare plant curator at Bok Tower Gardens in Lake Wales. Previously, she has worked at the Disney Preserve and at The Nature Conservancy Preserve in Kentucky. -
State and Federally Listed Species for Hillsborough County
State and Federally Listed Species for Hillsborough County - Note: Only federally listed plant species are included; “=”means a.k.a.; “SA” means similarity of appearance Scientific Name Common Name State USFWS Habitats Used Amphibians Rana capito Gopher (=crawfish) frog Sp. Spec. Concern Longleaf Pine/Turkey Oak Hills, Sand Pine Scrub, Scrubby Flatwoods, Xeric Oak Hammock (uses ephemeral wetlands for breeding) Birds Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub-jay Threatened Threatened Sand Pine Scrub and Scrubby Flatwoods Aramus guarauna Limpkin Sp. Spec. Concern Mangrove Swamp, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Cypress Swamp, Springs, Slough, Sawgrass Marsh, Ruderal (impoundments, canals, sugarcane, etc.) Athene cunicularia floridana Florida burrowing owl Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Flatwoods (dry prairie or grassland habitat), Ruderal (primarily pasture) Charadrius alexandrinus Southeastern snowy plover Threatened N. & S. FL Coastal Strand (west coast only) tenuirostris Charadrius melodus Piping plover Threatened Threatened N. & S. FL Coastal Stand, Nearshore Reef Egretta caerulea Little blue heron Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Egretta rufescens Reddish egret Sp. Spec. Concern Mangrove Swamp, N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Salt Marsh Egretta thula Snowy egret Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Egretta tricolor Tricolored (=Louisiana) heron Sp. Spec. Concern N. & S. FL Coastal Strand, Wet Prairie or Slough, Freshwater Marsh & Ponds, Mangrove Swamps, Cypress Swamp, Sawgrass Marsh, Salt Marsh, Shrub Bog & Bay Swamp, Ruderal Eudocimus albus White ibis Sp. -
PALM 31 3 Working.Indd
Volume 31: Number 3 > 2014 The Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society Palmetto Rare Plant Conservation at Bok Tower Gardens ● Yaupon Redeemed ● The Origin of Florida Scrub Plant Diversity Donna Bollenbach and Juliet Rynear A Collaboration of Passion, Purpose and Science Bok Tower Gardens Rare Plant Conservation Program “Today nearly 30 percent of the native fl ora in the United States is considered to be 1 of conservation concern. Without human intervention, many of these plants may be gone within our lifetime. Eighty percent of the at-risk species are closely related to plants with economic value somewhere in the world, and more than 50 percent are related to crop species...but it can be saved.” – Center for Plant Conservation Ask the average Florida citizen to name at least one endangered native animal in the state and they will likely mention the Florida manatee or the Florida panther. Ask the same person to name one endangered native plant and they give you a blank stare. Those of us working to conserve Florida’s unique plant species know this all 2 too well, and if the job isn’t diffi cult enough, a lack of funding and support for the conservation of land supporting imperiled plant communities makes it harder. Bok Tower Gardens Rare Plant Conservation Program is one of 39 botanical institutions throughout the United States that collaborate with the Center for Plant Conservation (CPC) to prevent the extinction of native plants in the United States. Created in 1984, CPC institutions house over 750 living specimens of the nation’s most endangered native plants, the largest living collection of rare plants in the world. -
Beta-Sitosterol [BSS] and Betasitosterol Glucoside [BSSG] As an Adjuvant in the Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients.” TB Weekly (4 Mar 1996)
Saw Palmetto (Serenoa repens) and One of Its Constituent Sterols -Sitosterol [83-46-5] Review of Toxicological Literature Prepared for Errol Zeiger, Ph.D. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences P.O. Box 12233 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 Contract No. N01-ES-65402 Submitted by Raymond Tice, Ph.D. Integrated Laboratory Systems P.O. Box 13501 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 November 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The nomination of saw palmetto and -sitosterol for testing is based on the potential for human exposure and the limited amount of toxicity and carcinogenicity data. Saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), a member of the palm family Arecaceae, is native to the West Indies and the Atlantic Coast of North America, from South Carolina to Florida. The plant may grow to a height of 20 feet (6.10 m), with leaves up to 3 feet (0.914 m) across. The berries are fleshy, about 0.75 inch (1.9 cm) in diameter, and blue-black in color. Saw palmetto berries contain sterols and lipids, including relatively high concentrations of free and bound sitosterols. The following chemicals have been identified in the berries: anthranilic acid, capric acid, caproic acid, caprylic acid, - carotene, ferulic acid, mannitol, -sitosterol, -sitosterol-D-glucoside, linoleic acid, myristic acid, oleic acid, palmitic acid, 1-monolaurin and 1-monomyristin. A number of other common plants (e.g., basil, corn, soybean) also contain -sitosterol. Saw palmetto extract has become the sixth best-selling herbal dietary supplement in the United States. In Europe, several pharmaceutical companies sell saw palmetto-based over-the-counter (OTC) drugs for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). -
Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases List of Plants for Diverticulitis
Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases List of Plants for Diverticulitis Plant Chemical Count Activity Count Picrasma quassioides 1 1 Diospyros undulata 1 1 Plectranthus rugosus 1 1 Rhizophora mucronata 1 1 Pterospermum acerifolium 1 1 Salvia apiana 1 1 Duboisia leichhardtii 1 1 Erythroxylum zambesiacum 1 1 Ilex verticillata 1 1 Aglaia leptantha 1 1 Cephalotaxus harringtonii 2 1 Dianthus sp. 1 1 Larix laricina 1 1 Lycopodium serratum 1 1 Plectranthus trichocarpus 1 1 Helleborus niger 1 1 Rhododendron anthopogon 1 1 Vancouveria hexandra 1 1 Alnus rubra 1 1 Hedyotis lawsoniae 1 1 Garcinia xanthochymus 1 1 Acanthus ilicifolius 1 1 Pterospermum lanceaefolium 1 1 Simaba obovata 1 1 Salvia beckeri 1 1 Polypodium aureum 1 1 Sorbus americana 1 1 Plant Chemical Count Activity Count Banisteriopsis caapi 2 1 Cephalotaxus spp 1 1 Betula alba 1 1 Dianthus superbus 1 1 Astragalus gummifer 1 1 Citrus unshiu 1 1 Prunus pensylvanica 1 1 Alnus rugosa 1 1 Euphorbia broteri 1 1 Gmelina arborea 1 1 Caladium bicolor 1 1 Hippomane mancinella 1 1 Casearia arborea 1 1 Pterospermum suberifolium 1 1 Aralia spinosa 1 1 Fagonia cretica 1 1 Indigofera tinctoria 1 1 Ornithogalum umbellatum 1 1 Tripterygium wilfordiim 1 1 Haplophyton cimicidum 1 1 Betula alleghaniensis 1 1 Glechoma hirsuta 1 1 Hygrophila auriculata 1 1 Lasianthus chinensis 1 1 Bupleurum salicifolium 1 1 Acacia lenticularis 1 1 Euphorbia hermentiana 1 1 2 Plant Chemical Count Activity Count Rhus alata 1 1 Pterospermum xylocarpum 1 1 Thymus piperella 1 1 Castanopsis concinna 1 1 Senecio -
Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park
Lake Manatee State Park Advisory Group Draft Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks March 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ....................................... 1 Park Significance ................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN..................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................... 7 Management Authority and Responsibility .............................................. 7 Park Management Goals ...................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................... 8 Public Participation ..............................................................................8 Other Designations .............................................................................9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT..................................... 12 Natural Resources ............................................................................. 12 Topography .................................................................................. 12 Geology ...................................................................................... -
Bonita Bay Presentation Center Mitigation Plan Permit No
BONITA BAY PRESENTATION CENTER MITIGATION PLAN PERMIT NO. 36-00289-S, APPLICATION NO. 180907-3 JANUARY 18, 2019 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARIELLE KITCHENER 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 (239) 643-0166- OFFICE, (239) 253-1860- CELL [email protected] Bonita Presentation Center- App. 180907-3 Mitigation Plan (1/18/19) 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Bonita Bay Presentation Center Project is a 1.408-acre parcel, which was previously developed in 1995 as a sales center in Bonita Bay with associated parking (Application 950726-1). Under the previous permit not all of the 1.41 upland acres was cleared and filled. Some areas remained untouched as native habitat. Several years ago, the sales center was removed, and the pavement scraped up and disposed of to make room for new development. The new applicant is requesting to construct two (2) structures on this parcel with associated stormwater management for pre-treatment. The new development would for the most part lie within the old clearing footprint. A very minor amount of new additional clearing is needed to accommodate the water management system and building bulkhead installation, but all new clearing and filling lies landward of the 1993 DER Binding Jurisdictional Line. The site is located on a peninsular island in the far west side of Bonita Bay with other development and golf courses. It is specifically situated in Section 29, Township 47 South, Range 25 East, Lee County, Florida (site address 4701 Bonita Bay Blvd., Bonita Springs, FL 34134). 2 Bonita Presentation Center- App. 180907-3 Mitigation Plan (1/18/19) 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Habitats onsite as referenced in the FLUCCS Map are found described below. -
Induced Prostatic Hyperplasia in Sprague?Dawley Rats
JPP.book Page 995 Monday, May 28, 2007 12:41 PM JPP 2007, 59: 995–999 © 2007 The Authors Received December 18, 2006 Accepted March 30, 2007 DOI 10.1211/jpp.59.7.0012 Effects of coconut oil on testosterone-induced prostatic ISSN 0022-3573 hyperplasia in Sprague–Dawley rats María de Lourdes Arruzazabala, Vivian Molina, Rosa Más, Daisy Carbajal, David Marrero, Víctor González, Eduardo Rodríguez Abstract Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the benign uncontrolled growth of the prostate gland, leading to difficulty with urination. Saw palmetto lipid extracts (SPLE), used to treat BPH, have been shown to inhibit prostate 5a-reductase, and some major components, such as lauric, myristic and oleic acids also inhibit this enzyme. Coconut oil (CO) is also rich in fatty acids, mainly lauric and myristic acids. We inves- tigated whether CO prevents testosterone-induced prostate hyperplasia (PH) in Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals were distributed into seven groups (10 rats each). A negative control group were injected with soya oil; six groups were injected with testosterone (3 mg kg−1) to induce PH: a positive control group, and five groups treated orally with SPLE (400 mg kg−1), CO or sunflower oil (SO) (400 and 800 mg kg−1). Treatments were given for 14 days. Rats were weighed before treatment and weekly thereafter. Rats were then killed and the prostates were removed and weighed. CO (400 and 800 mg kg−1), SPLE (400 mg kg−1) and SO at 800 mg kg−1, but not at 400 mg kg−1, significantly reduced the increase in pros- tate weight (PW) and PW:body weight (BW) ratio induced by testosterone (% inhibition 61.5%, 82.0%, 43.8% and 28.2%, respectively).