Let Loose the Scorpions!
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The South African Criminal Law's Response to The
THE SOUTH AFRICAN CRIMINAL LAW’S RESPONSE TO THE CRIMES OF FRAUD AND CORRUPTION WITHIN LOCAL GOVERNMENT by STEPHANIE NAIDOO Submitted in accordance with the requirements of the degree of MASTERS OF LAW (LLM) in the subject PUBLIC LAW at the UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR G.P. STEVENS OCTOBER 2016 © University of Pretoria ii DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA The Department of Public Law places great emphasis upon integrity and ethical conduct in the preparation of all written work submitted for academic evaluation. While academic staff teach you about referencing techniques and how to avoid plagiarism, you too have a responsibility in this regard. If you are at any stage uncertain as to what is required, you should speak to your lecturer before any written work is submitted. You are guilty of plagiarism if you copy something from another author’s work (eg a book, an article or a website) without acknowledging the source and pass it off as your own. In effect you are stealing something that belongs to someone else. This is not only the case when you copy work word-for-word (verbatim), but also when you submit someone else’s work in a slightly altered form (paraphrase) or use a line of argument without acknowledging it. You are not allowed to use work previously produced by another student. You are also not allowed to let anybody copy your work with the intention of passing if off as his/her work. Students who commit plagiarism will not be given any credit for plagiarised work. The matter may also be referred to the Disciplinary Committee (Students) for a ruling. -
Country Guide South Africa
Human Rights and Business Country Guide South Africa March 2015 Table of Contents How to Use this Guide .................................................................................. 3 Background & Context ................................................................................. 7 Rights Holders at Risk ........................................................................... 15 Rights Holders at Risk in the Workplace ..................................................... 15 Rights Holders at Risk in the Community ................................................... 25 Labour Standards ................................................................................. 35 Child Labour ............................................................................................... 35 Forced Labour ............................................................................................ 39 Occupational Health & Safety .................................................................... 42 Trade Unions .............................................................................................. 49 Working Conditions .................................................................................... 56 Community Impacts ............................................................................. 64 Environment ............................................................................................... 64 Land & Property ......................................................................................... 72 Revenue Transparency -
South Africa to Prosecute Apartheid-Era Police for Murder
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO: i\,\i \ /18 ln the ex parte application of: THEMBISILE PHUMELELE NKADIMENG Applicant ---------------- CONSOLIDATED INDEX: NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT I PAGE NO. I - -----1 1 . Notice of Motion 1 - 3 I I 2. Founding Affidavit of Thembisile Phumelele 4-30 Nkadimeng 7 I 3. Annexure "TN 1" - Confirmatory Affidavit of 31 -33 Sizakele Ernestina Simelane 4. Annexure "TN 2" - Decision of the Amnesty 34- 43 \ Committee 5. Annexure "TN 3" - Indictment 44- 57 6. Annexure "TN 4" - Supporting Affidavit of Frank 58 - 102 Dutton 7. Annexure "TN 5" - Newspaper Report 103 - 104 8. Annexure "TN 6" - Newspaper Report 105 9. Annexure "TN 7'' - Letter from Neville Thoms 106 - 110 10. Annexure "TN 8" - Letter from Neville Thoms 111-115 11. Annexure "TN 9" - Warning in terms of Section 35 116-119 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 12. Annexure "TN 1O " - Letter from the Chairperson of 120-121 the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances _ _J 2 13. Annexure "TN 11" - City Press Opinion 122 - 132 14. Annexure "TN 12" - Media Briefing 133 - 143 15. Annexure "TN 13" - Newspaper report 144-155 ON THIS'l.R~DAY OF ~0\1'L"'~ 2018. 1 llia\l~~ WEBBER WENTZEL Attorneys for the Applicant 90 Rivonia Road, Sandton PO Box 61771, Marshalltown Docex 26, Johannesburg Tel: 011 530 5000 Fax: 0115305111 Email: moray.hath a [email protected] Ref: M Hathorn C/0 Stephen Leinberger Per: SAVAGE JOOSTE & ADAMS INC 141 Boshoff Street Niew Muckleneuk, Pretoria PO Box 7 45 Pretoria 0001 Docex 58 Pretoria Tel: (012) 452 8200 Fax: (012) 452 8230 Email: [email protected] TO: THE REGISTRAR OF THE ABOVE HONOURABLE COURT • PRETORIA .r IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO: 2,hSg l /18 In the ex parte application of: THEMBISILE PHUMELELE NKAOIMENG NOTICE OF MO • \ on ~ J U1\e. -
In the High Court of South Africa Gauteng Local
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 2015/42219 In the matter between: WILLEM HELM JOHANNES COETZEE First Applicant ANTON PRETORIUS Second Applicant FREDERICK BARNARD MONG Third Applicant THEMBISILE PHUMELELE NKADIMENG Fourth Applicant and THE MINISTER OF POLICE First Respondent THE PROVINCIAL COMMISSIONER FOR GAUTENG, SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE Second Respondent ___________________________________________________________________ HEADS OF ARGUMENT FOR THE FOURTH APPLICANT ___________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW OF THE CASE ....................................................................................... 3 THE SCHEME OF THESE SUBMISSIONS ............................................................... 6 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................. 7 Nkadimeng’s Efforts to Secure Justice .............................................................. 7 Further Delay ...................................................................................................... 10 THE APPLICANTS’ ACTIONS WERE AUTHORISED ............................................ 11 Expert Affidavit – Dumisa Ntsebeza SC ............................................................ 13 Expert Affidavit – Frank Dutton ......................................................................... 20 APPLICABLE LEGAL FRAMEWORK & OBLIGATION TO PAY ACCUSEDS’ LEGAL FEES .......................................................................................................... -
Developing a New Policing Reform Agenda
APCOF Policy Paper 15 Februay 2017 Substantive areas of police reform: Developing a new policing reform agenda Melanie Lue Dugmore Introduction Against a framework for democratic policing, this paper provides the reader with an accessible overview of the extensive policing reform agenda in South Africa over the democratic period. Mindful of the still-pending review of the South African Police Act, it provides a summary of some of the key issues that should be considered. The paper addresses substantive reform in the following thematic areas: • The protection of human rights and demilitarisation, with particular emphasis on public order policing; • Independence and operational autonomy of policing institutions and oversight bodies; and • Police responsiveness, efficiency and professionalism. This forms the basis for revisiting outstanding police reform imperatives that should be addressed in an agenda for change. The recommendations proposed in this paper are not new. They have been consistently addressed by judicial commissions of inquiry, task teams, parliament, the Ministry of Police and by the police themselves. Given the vast range of reform initiatives, including those pertinent to areas such as systems and logistics management, democratic policing principles were used as a lens to focus the study on those areas of reforms relevant to the interaction between police and civilians. David Bayley identifies two essential features of policing in a democracy: responsiveness and accountability.1 A democratic police service ‘responds to -
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report
VOLUME THREE Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction to Regional Profiles ........ 1 Appendix: National Chronology......................... 12 Chapter 2 REGIONAL PROFILE: Eastern Cape ..................................................... 34 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Eastern Cape........................................................... 150 Chapter 3 REGIONAL PROFILE: Natal and KwaZulu ........................................ 155 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in Natal, KwaZulu and the Orange Free State... 324 Chapter 4 REGIONAL PROFILE: Orange Free State.......................................... 329 Chapter 5 REGIONAL PROFILE: Western Cape.................................................... 390 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Western Cape ......................................................... 523 Chapter 6 REGIONAL PROFILE: Transvaal .............................................................. 528 Appendix: Statistics on Violations in the Transvaal ...................................................... -
S African Cabinet Divided'over OAD Monitoring Visit
E for a FREE SOUTHERN AFRICA C EPISCOPAL CHURCH PEOPLE S 339 Lafayette Street A Phone (212) 477-0066 New York, N.Y. 10012 FAX: (212) 979-1013 #123 13 May 1992 ~ THE INDEPENDENT Monday 4 May 1992 European The South AfricaD 1l0vernmeDl 15 uDderstood to br IlMDtbusw tic about an IDternltional mission The Synod of the proposal scrutiDisiDg the lItCUrit) fot cts. Bishops of the bat both the govern_at and tbe The questloa wal dbcuned at Anglican Church, aD lDformaJ meetiac ofEC fo~ign IDbtba Freedom Pam' Ila' f to monitor mial.ten that eDded ID Portupl stated tul electiolls art oiat of the 3 May 1992 question while tbt towtibip wars 011 Saturday. "All art agrHd OD tbt UfJeDCY or the problem IDd persisL DiplollUlu bope to ftJJd a tilt Deed to do 5OJMtbiDg. Wbat formula for IDlervtlltioa that Mil 'We callan the SA police bt diftlcuJt to ~isL The suppon lias DOt beta decided vet a~ tbe Convention for a M the AtriaD National CoDgJ"fss. modal.idel or tbt EC rOle." I Eu Derrocratic South ropean diplomat said. AmoDl tbe whose presldeDt. Nelson Mande Fr..- Job Carlin ta. bas raiJed tbt IIUItter both Africa to VDrk in Johannesburg aJternatins UDder scrutiDv art aD EC Illisslo.. a bod) co~prislog ltith Mr EllellUlnD-JeDsfD aDd quickly towards OAl leaden, is IlW"aIIleed. THE !aropeu C_aDiay is membrrs of the OrpaisaooD or AfricaD Ualt), (OAUl - perhaps 11lt SolIdi Africu .J-dkiar:v setting up an in plIttiIIc its wdPI behi.cI propos. bKbd b,· tJ.t CommooweaJth lias jobIed dw cm-r for artioo ternational IIDni als for Ihf muoDctioa M IDler aplut dw poIb. -
Marikana and the Doctrine of Maximum Force
MARIKANA AND THE DOCTRINE OF MAXIMUM FORCE 1 MARIKANA AND THE DOCTRINE OF MAXIMUM FORCE Marikana and the Doctrine of Maximum Force By David Bruce LONDON — Nearly a quarter of a century after 96 Liverpool soccer fans were crushed to death in one of the worst stadium disasters in history, Prime Minister David Cameron formally apologized on Wednesday to the victims’ families, saying their “appalling deaths” were compounded by an attempt by the police, investigators and the news media to depict the victims as hooligans and to blame them for the disaster. Before a hushed House of Commons, Mr. Cameron said the families had suffered “a double injustice” in the failures of the police, fire officials and other authorities to anticipate the disaster or to contain its scale once it occurred, and in the efforts that followed to cover up police failings by altering witness statements, and to pin responsibility on the victims for their own deaths. -- New York Times, September 13, 2012 2 MARIKANA AND THE DOCTRINE OF MAXIMUM FORCE David Bruce David Bruce has been researching and writing about policing, violence and the criminal justice system since 1996, and is regarded as the country's leading experts on issues relating to police use of force. He has worked for a variety of think-tanks and NGOs, including the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, the Institute for Security Studies, and Corruption Watch. 3 MARIKANA AND THE DOCTRINE OF MAXIMUM FORCE Published in South Africa in 2012 by PARKTOWN PUBLISHERS (Pty) Ltd Trading as MAMPOER SHORTS Harrow Court 1, Isle of Houghton, Boundary Road, Parktown, Johannesburg 2011/107084/07 Copyright © Parktown Publishers, South Africa, 2012 DB_Marikana20121018 Website: www.mampoer.co.za Email: [email protected] MampoerShorts promotes South Africa’s top writers. -
South Africa Country Report BTI 2018
BTI 2018 Country Report South Africa This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — South Africa. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2018 | South Africa 3 Key Indicators Population M 55.9 HDI 0.666 GDP p.c., PPP $ 13225 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.6 HDI rank of 188 119 Gini Index 63.4 Life expectancy years 61.9 UN Education Index 0.720 Poverty3 % 35.9 Urban population % 65.3 Gender inequality2 0.394 Aid per capita $ 25.8 Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary In the period under review, South Africa faced some of its most stringent economic-, social- and political challenges since its democratic transition in 1994. -
Stop Police Killings & Hands Off Our Protectors
NEWSLETTER SAPUSOUTH AFRICAN POLICING UNION ISSN 2310-1032 SAPU Second Quarter 2015 www.sapu.org.za Stop police killings & hands off our protectors Editorial SAPU Newsletter - Second quarter 2015 SAPU Newsletter - Second quarter 2015 Contents The killing of police officers The South African Policing Union should stop and the police (SAPU) Newsletter is published Main feature should defend themselves Protect our protectors quarterly. Hands ‘off’ our protectors 4 when necessary but within The views and opinions expressed Police Killings - Impact and effects 5 the law. The community in the articles are those of the authors Put an end to Police Attacks 6 should also play a and do not necessarily represent those Senseless killing of W/O Holz 7 part in ‘protecting our of SAPU. Police service should remain professional 8 - 9 protectors’. This is in line Acceptance and publication of Women in service 10 with South African Policing advertorial and advertising matter Tribute to Jojo 11 Union (SAPU)’s motto: in the SAPU Newsletter does not Professional policing - A must for better SA 12 - 14 Together we can make a constitute SAPU endorsement or De-Politicised and Professional Policing 15 - 16 difference. A change in warranty in respect of goods or services Status of policing in South Africa 18 - 20 the way street patrols are therein described. COPS must defend themselves 20 carried out can also help SAPU does not assume any liability in improving security for in respect of any claims made in on-duty police officers. advertisements. We also welcome the recent pronouncements Publisher: Lebo Zulu Creatives on by President Jacob Zuma behalf of SAPU. -
Unveiling the Third Force: Toward
This article was downloaded by: [James Gump] On: 26 February 2014, At: 06:56 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Safundi: The Journal of South African and American Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsaf20 Unveiling the Third Force: Toward Transitional Justice in the USA and South Africa, 1973–1994 James Gumpa a Department of History, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcala Park, San Diego, CA 92110, USA Published online: 21 Feb 2014. To cite this article: James Gump (2014) Unveiling the Third Force: Toward Transitional Justice in the USA and South Africa, 1973–1994, Safundi: The Journal of South African and American Studies, 15:1, 75-100, DOI: 10.1080/17533171.2013.864164 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17533171.2013.864164 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. -
South Africa Survey
file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/05%20Post-Transition/T_SAIRR%20Reports%201994-2000/SAIRR%20Survey%201996-97.HTM SOUTH AFRICA SURVEY 1996/97 ELIZABETH SIDIROPOULOS ANTHEA JEFFERY SHAUN MACKAY HERMA FORGEY CHERYL CHIPPS TERENCE CORRIGAN Research staff South African Institute of Race Relations with contributions from Carmel Musiker Kecia Rust Tanya Zack Published with the financial assistance of the United States Agency for International Development SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS JOHANNESBURG 1997 Published by the South African Institute of Race Relations file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/05%20Post...0Reports%201994-2000/SAIRR%20Survey%201996-97.HTM (1 of 1640)25/11/2004 15:36:43 PM file:///G|/ProjWip/Products/Omalley/Tim/05%20Post-Transition/T_SAIRR%20Reports%201994-2000/SAIRR%20Survey%201996-97.HTM Auden House, 68 De Korte Street Braamfontein, Johannesburg, 2001 South Africa Copyright South African Institute of Race Relations, 1997 ISSN 1027-1724 PD 11/1997 ISBN 0-86982-454-6 Members of the media are free to reprint or report information, either in whole or in part, contained in this publication on the strict understanding that the South African Institute of Race Relations in acknowledged. Otherwise no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronical, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. This publication was made possible through support provided by USAID/South Africa under the terms of Grant No 674-0301-A-00-6081-00. Opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Agency for International Development.