State Defense Forces and Their Role in American Homeland Security

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State Defense Forces and Their Role in American Homeland Security NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS STATE DEFENSE FORCES AND THEIR ROLE IN AMERICAN HOMELAND SECURITY by Jonathan R. Pohnel March 2015 Thesis Advisor: Erik J. Dahl Second Reader: Carolyn C. Halladay Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2015 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS STATE DEFENSE FORCES AND THEIR ROLE IN AMERICAN HOMELAND SECURITY 6. AUTHOR(S) Jonathan R. Pohnel 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. IRB Protocol number ____N/A____. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited A 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) State Defense Forces (SDFs), or organized state militias and naval militias, have a long and distinguished history of service in the United States. These state-sanctioned organizations are substantiated and legitimized through the U.S. justice system and constitutional law. Currently, 23 states and U.S. territories have SDFs; unlike National Guard units, they cannot be federalized, which means they remain a state-level asset during emergency management operations. SDFs were utilized successfully during Hurricane Katrina, proving their value in state and federal emergency response efforts. This thesis seeks to analyze the structure and usefulness of the SDF as a volunteer emergency response organization. Second, it seeks to understand the evolution of the SDF by examining U.S. militia history. Third, it examines the disaster-relief efforts of SDFs with regard to Hurricane Katrina. SDFs provide state governors with emergency response personnel who are locally available and ready to serve in multiple capacities. Presently, state officials can promote legislation and develop a mission-flexible State Defense Force that can act as a reserve force for local law enforcement and the National Guard during natural and man-made disasters. The SDF may be the next step in the evolution of state and local emergency response in the 21st century. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF state defense forces, homeland security PAGES 89 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UU NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited STATE DEFENSE FORCES AND THEIR ROLE IN AMERICAN HOMELAND SECURITY Jonathan R. Pohnel Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy B.A., Middle Tennessee State University, 2001 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN SECURITY STUDIES (HOMELAND SECURITY AND DEFENSE) from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL March 2015 Author: Jonathan R. Pohnel Approved by: Erik J. Dahl Thesis Advisor Carolyn C. Halladay Second Reader Mohammed M. Hafez, Ph.D. Chair, Department of National Security Affairs iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT State Defense Forces (SDFs), or organized state militias and naval militias, have a long and distinguished history of service in the United States. These state-sanctioned organizations are substantiated and legitimized through the U.S. justice system and constitutional law. Currently, 23 states and U.S. territories have SDFs; unlike National Guard units, they cannot be federalized, which means they remain a state-level asset during emergency management operations. SDFs were utilized successfully during Hurricane Katrina, proving their value in state and federal emergency response efforts. This thesis seeks to analyze the structure and usefulness of the SDF as a volunteer emergency response organization. Second, it seeks to understand the evolution of the SDF by examining U.S. militia history. Third, it examines the disaster-relief efforts of SDFs with regard to Hurricane Katrina. SDFs provide state governors with emergency response personnel who are locally available and ready to serve in multiple capacities. Presently, state officials can promote legislation and develop a mission-flexible State Defense Force that can act as a reserve force for local law enforcement and the National Guard during natural and man-made disasters. The SDF may be the next step in the evolution of state and local emergency response in the 21st century. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION................................................................2 B. IMPORTANCE ................................................................................................2 1. Economic Importance ..........................................................................2 2. Political and Historical Importance ...................................................3 C. PROBLEMS AND HYPOTHESES ...............................................................4 D. METHODS AND SOURCES .........................................................................4 E. THESIS OVERVIEW .....................................................................................5 II. STATE DEFENSE FORCES: AN OVERVIEW ......................................................7 A. SDF COMPOSITION AND COMMAND STRUCTURE ...........................9 B. SDF AND NATIONAL GUARD INTERACTION AND ITS EFFECTIVENESS .........................................................................................12 C. POSSE COMITATUS ADVANTAGE ........................................................15 III. THE COLONIAL MILITIA—THE GENESIS OF THE STATE DEFENSE FORCE........................................................................................................................17 A. THE EARLY COLONIAL MILITIA 1607–1754 .......................................17 B. ENGLISH PHILOSOPHY ............................................................................20 C. COLONIAL MILITIAS AND THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR .......21 IV. THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR MILITIA AND THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION ..................................................................................................25 A. THE FIRST CONTINENTAL CONGRESS ..............................................25 B. THE SECOND CONTINENTAL CONGRESS AND THE CONTINENTAL ARMY ..............................................................................27 C. THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION ................................................30 V. THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK TO THE MODERN SDF ..............33 A. THE CONSTITUTION AND THE MILITIA ............................................33 B. THE SECOND AMENDMENT ...................................................................37 C. THE MILITIA ACTS OF 1792 ....................................................................38 D. THE DICK ACT ............................................................................................39 E. WWI TO THE PRESENT ............................................................................40 F. TITLE 32 U.S. CODE § 109 AND TENNESSEE SDF LEGISLATION ..41 VI. STATE DEFENSE FORCES AND HURRICANE KATRINA.............................43 A. SDFS AND THEIR ROLE IN HURRICANE KATRINA .........................45 B. U.S. MILITARY, NATIONAL GUARD, AND SDF RESPONSE ............47 C. FUNDING KATRINA DISASTER RELIEF ..............................................48 VII. CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................................53 APPENDIX .............................................................................................................................57 A. PATRIOT MILITIA ETHOS AND U.S. MILITIA HISTORY ................57 B. WEAKNESS OF THE CONFEDERATION ..............................................58 vii C. THE CONFEDERATION, ANARCHY, AND OFFENSIVE REALISM .......................................................................................................58 D. THE SDFS IN CONTRAST TO THE PATRIOT MILITIAS ..................60 LIST OF REFERENCES ......................................................................................................65 INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST .........................................................................................73
Recommended publications
  • The International Legal Implications of Potential Sdf Action
    13_MUELLER_FORMAT 2 MACROS(DO NOT DELETE) 6/10/2015 10:42 PM A STATE’S RIGHT TO MILITARY POWER: THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF POTENTIAL SDF ACTION RACHEL MUELLER* INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 237 I. STRUCTURE OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES ...................... 239 A. Federal Forces ...................................................................................... 239 B. The National Guard .............................................................................. 240 C. State Defense Forces ............................................................................ 241 II. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR SDFS ........................................................................ 244 A. History of SDFs Prior to the Constitution ............................................ 245 B. The Constitution ................................................................................... 246 C. Interpreting the Constitutional Grant of Power .................................... 247 III. FOREIGN RELATIONS POWERS IN THE UNITED STATES .................. 250 A. International Relations Power and Preemption .................................... 250 B. Declaring War and Engaging in War .................................................... 251 C. Categorizing Mexican Drug Cartels as Political Entities Capable of Provoking the Internationally Legal Use of Force by SDFs.............. 252 IV. INTERNATIONAL LAW .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State Defense Force Times Winter 2020
    State Defense Force Times Message from the President Winter 2020 MG Jay Coggan • Increase our external California State Guard communications to educate the public and government at all First, as we start off a new year, let me levels as to our mission congratulate BG Hayhurst and BG • Expand training opportunities Santiago for a great annual conference in across the country and online Biloxi, MS. Unfortunately, prior California State Guard commitments kept Internal communications have been me from attending, but I received great driven mostly by our web, newsletter, and feedback from our members. Your periodic announcements. We will be dedication and work is appreciated! updating our email capabilities to provide As we move into 2020 we have the more relevant and timely information to opportunity to build on our past success our members. To make this effort and make this a transformative year. My successful, I ask that each member please singular mission focus for SAGUS this go to their member profile in the SGAUS year is to improve our communications to web site make sure your contact and make us the most effective organization email information is current. We are that we can be. My key strategies to establishing a team to evaluate and accomplish this goal are: implement new strategies for internal communications. More information on • Improve our communications with this effort will be forthcoming. members 1 Now, regarding external communications, opportunity for SGAUS to SDF help our I firmly believe that this year SGAUS can respective states deal with this issue. take it to the next level in how we make It’s never too early to start planning for ourselves known outside our association the 2020 SAGUS Annual Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 80 the South Carolina Maritime Security Commission and Naval Militia
    CHAPTER 80 The South Carolina Maritime Security Commission and Naval Militia (Statutory Authority: 1976 Code § 54–17–50) 80–001. Functions of the South Carolina Maritime Security Commission. 1. The South Carolina Maritime Security Commission (SCMSC) reports administratively to the Governor of the State of South Carolina as Chief Executive and operationally to the Governor as Commander-in-Chief of State Forces. 2. The SCMSC consists of nine commissioners and is headed by a Chairman and Vice Chairman elected by the members. It will meet at the direction of the Chairman at least quarterly. A quorum consists of a simple majority of the commissioners appointed by the Governor who are present. Ex- officio members are excluded from the quorum. If a quorum is not available, actions are effective as if made by a quorum but implemented on an interim basis until validated by a quorum. 3. The SCMSC reviews all requests for operational tasking for the SCNM. It will ensure compliance with federal and state law, pertinence to Captain of the Port requirements and other applicable policies and procedures, operational tempo and consider availability of volunteer SCNM assets. 4. The SCMSC shall publish and maintain a Policies and Procedures Manual (PPM). The PPM shall provide guidance regarding the administration of matters coming before the SCMSC. 5. The Chairman of the SCMSC annually shall submit a report to the Governor and to the General Assembly that will include a summary of the activities and operations of the SCMSC and the SCNM during the previous calendar year, and shall contain such general observations and recommendations relating to maritime security, as the SCMSC deems appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Naval Militia Newsletter Spring 2020
    NEW YORK NAVAL MILITIA NEWSLETTER SPRING 2020 NEW YORK NAVAL MILITIA 330 Old Niskayuna Road Latham, New York 12110 NYNM - An entity of the 1 (518) 786-4583 New York State Division of Military & Naval Affairs Fax: (518) 786-4427 http://dmna.ny.gov/nynm/ COMMANDER’S CORNER: RDML Warren T. Smith Commander New York Naval Militia To All Members of the New York Naval Militia: All of us understand by now that we are in the midst of a state, national, and global emergency the scale of which we have never experienced before. While comparisons to World War II and the Spanish flu pandemic following WWI give some historical context, the unprecedented nature of virus transmission facilitated by international air travel and global commerce as well as the rapid dissemination of information – some accurate, some speculation, and some nonsense – means that we are in uncharted waters. No one is or will remain immune from the effects, whether physical, psychological or economic, which will be long lasting. The health care system of no city or country is adequately prepared to administer to the numbers of people who require care. The good news is that our Naval Militia members have responded. The number of Militia men and women on active duty has grown to 81 as of this writing, some working at Latham, others with the various Joint Task Forces deployed around the state. While the primary demand has been for medical and logistics specialties, some general purpose Militia members have been working side by side with the NY State Guard and National Guard helping with the transport of test samples from collection sites to labs, the cleaning of public facilities, and the distribution of food to communities in need.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Naval Militia
    FOR OFFICIAL NYNM USE ONLY NYNM Form 1121 New York Naval Militia How to Join the New York Naval Militia If you are interested in becoming a member of the New York Naval Militia, you must meet eligibility requirements. Prior to submitting an application, please determine your eligibility by ensuring you meet the below criteria. Please note, standards for affiliation can be found in the following directives by visiting our website at http://dmna.ny.gov/nynm/, clicking on the Forms/Instructions tab on the left, and finding the following instructions: • Administrative requirements: NYNMINST 1001.1 (series) • Grooming and uniform requirements: NYNMINST 1020.1 (series) • Physical and medical requirements: NYNMINST 6110.1 (series) • Billet requirements: NYNMINST 5320.1 (series) Basic Eligibility for Membership: Basic eligibility criteria for membership in the New York Naval Militia include: a. Age: 18 – 67 years. b. Citizenship: • Enlisted: United States citizen, or applicants who have made a declaration of intent to become citizen of the United States. • Commissioned officers & warrant officers: United States citizen. c. Residency: All members of the New York Naval Militia must be legal residents of New York State, or be a drilling reservist whose primary drilling location is located within New York State. Any non-drilling member who subsequently changes their legal residence to a location outside of New York State is no longer eligible for membership in the New York Naval Militia. d. Education: Enlisted and warrant officer: High school graduate or graduate equivalency diploma (GED). e. Medical: Maintain standards of medical fitness in accordance with Department of the Navy (Navy or Marine Corps) or Department of Homeland Security (Coast Guard) regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Analysis and Fiscal Impact Statement
    The Florida Senate BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) Prepared By: The Professional Staff of the Committee on Criminal Justice BILL: SB 296 INTRODUCER: Senator Brandes SUBJECT: Carrying a Concealed Weapon or a Concealed Firearm DATE: February 24, 2014 REVISED: ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR REFERENCE ACTION 1. Cellon Cannon CJ Pre-meeting 2. MS 3. CA I. Summary: SB 296 creates an exception to s. 790.01, F.S. Section 790.01, F.S., is the statute that prohibits carrying concealed weapons or firearms unless a person is licensed to do so or if the weapon is a self-defense chemical spray or nonlethal stun gun or similar device designed for defensive purposes. The exception provided in the bill only allows a person to carry a concealed weapon or firearm while complying with a mandatory evacuation order issued pursuant to ch. 252, F.S., regardless of licensure status. II. Present Situation: Concealed and Open Carry, Weapons and Firearms, Criminal Penalties Under current Florida law, it is lawful for a person to carry a concealed weapon without a concealed weapon license for purposes of lawful self-defense, so long as the weapon is limited to self-defense chemical spray, a nonlethal stun gun, a dart-firing stun gun, or other nonlethal electric weapon or device that is designed solely for defensive purposes.1 1 s. 790.01(4), F.S. BILL: SB 296 Page 2 Without licensure, carrying a different type of concealed weapon,2 electric weapon, or device other than one designed solely for defensive purposes is a first degree misdemeanor.3 Carrying a concealed firearm without proper licensure is a third degree felony offense.4 It is lawful for a person to openly carry a self-defense chemical spray, nonlethal stun gun or dart- firing stun gun, or other nonlethal electric weapon or device that is designed solely for defensive purposes.5 Certain persons under particular circumstances are exempt from the limitations on the open carry of weapons in s.
    [Show full text]
  • SDF Times Newsletter
    Spring SDF Times 2016 Presidents Message Coming Soon! As I approach the end of my tour as your President, I would like to thank you for your membership and service in you State Defense Force. It is wonderful to 2016 work with many selfless servants and patriots as we strive to add value to our SDF Nationwide Commex Military Department teams. I encourage you to continue to enhance your skills in disaster mitigation, preparedness and response. 25 June I would also like to thank the many Committee Chairs, Committee members, and the Board of Directors for their efforts to improve our organization. Over SGAUS Annual the last year, our membership has grown 20%. We instituted a new JAG train- ing program, and improved our Chaplain, Engineer and MEMS programs. The Conference-Puerto Rico board just recently approved the PME Academy, and in a couple of months we will be offering our members the opportunity to obtain a veteran’s ID card, 16-18 September and purchase all their equipment needs through a partnership we have with ROTHCO, a supplier of military tactical outdoor clothing and gear. JAG Conference & We continue our efforts to engage USAA so that our members may one day have access to the range of their benefits. Last year, the Board of Directors, Training- Puerto Rico approved the migration of the SGAUS website to its current website which is 16-17 September more robust and contains more resources for our membership. As a result of the Strategic Plan survey we sent out two years ago, we now have an Education, Engineer, Medical, and JAG Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • State Defense Force Times
    State Defense Force Times and rescue efforts, provided medical services, and distributed food and water to hurricane victims. SGAUS is composed of over 3,000 soldiers throughout the 50 states and several territories, and over 570 attended the largest SGAUS Conference in its history. The annual conference provides opportunities for soldiers to obtain training in best practices in their specialties including communications, engineering, law, chaplain services, search and rescue, public affairs, and coordination with the United States Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Organized as a military force, each SDF reports to the state’s governor through the adjutant general, and best practices and training are developed through SGAUS and disseminated through the conference. SFC Patricia Isenberg of the South Carolina State Guard leads the way at the Hurricane Hike at the 2017 SGAUS Annual Conference in Myrtle Beach, SouthSpring Carolina. (Photo: – Summer Ms. Ronnie Berndt of2018 Hickory, North Carolina) The SGAUS Conference concluded on 23 September 2017 with its annual banquet. The South Carolina State Guard hosted the annual Keynoting the conference was former South conference of the State Guard Association of the Carolina Congressman Jim DeMint. United States (SGAUS) from September 21 – 23, 2017. SGAUS, the professional association of A Message from the Editor… State Defense Forces (SDF), provides organizational and training information for the Articles and images for the SDF Times are state militias organized under Title 10 of the welcome. Please send all articles to CPT (TN) United States Federal Code. Under Title 10 each Steven Estes at: state may organize a military force to respond to emergencies such as the recent Harvey and Irma [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Captain of the Naval Militia
    NAVAL MILITIA. 813 FIRST SEPARATE NAVAL DIVISION. This division was organized, April 15, 1898; its headquarters were on the naval militia ship " New Hampshire," and it was dis• banded, February 15, 1899. SECOND SEPARATE NAVAL DIVISION. State Armory, Wood and South streets, Rochester; Boathouse, Char• lotte. The -second separate naval division was organized, November 24, 1891, and performed duty for the United States during the Spanish-American war in the United States navy, and in the United States auxiliary naval force aboard the " Franklin " and other vessels. REPORT OF THE CAPTAIN OF THE NAVAL MILITIA. HEADQUARTERS, NAVAL MILITIA, N. Y., 31 NASSAU STREET, NEW YORK, October 10th, 1898. Adjutant-General, General Headquarters, Albany, A. Y. SIR:—I have the honor to submit the following report on the naval militia during the war with Spain: The operations of the state naval forces were divided into two periods—one of preparation, and one of active service'—and into two officially distinct duties, that in the navy proper, and that in the auxiliary naval force. I. About the first of March, the naval militia, of New York con• sisted of forty-nine officers and five hundred and four men. On March 26th, orders were received from general headquarters, to call for volunteers to proceed to League Island, Pa., to man the monitors " Jason " and " Nahant." On March 31st, the men were ready to proceed, but the detail for the " Nahant" did not leave until April 12th, as the vessel was not in condition, until that date, to be put into commission. During the early days of April, NEW YORK IN SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR.
    [Show full text]
  • Times Spring 2015
    SDF Times Spring 2015 COMMUNICATIONS Message from the President, BG(AK) Roger E. Holl: s Message from the President The Need Other News The State Guard Association of the United States is highly proactive in its News from the State Guards efforts to prepare State Defense Forces to respond to the needs of the states. In Word Search today’s environment, the world is a dangerous place. In addition, changing weather patterns are continuing to bring natural disasters which affect our citizens. There has never been a greater need for State Defense Forces to be UPCOMING EVENTS capable of augmenting the National Guard in time of emergencies in a highly October 29, 2015 professional manner. SGAUS Board Meet at 1600 Hanover, MD Strategic Planning October 30, 2015 The Strategic Planning Committee of the State Guard Association of the SGAUS JAG/Legal CLE Training United States will soon be contacting you to survey your thoughts on how SGAUS Hanover, MD can best serve every soldier in SGAUS and your State Defense Force. SGAUS is Oct 30 – Nov 1, 2015 concerned with every soldier, so please participate in the survey. In addition, the 2015 Annual Conference State Guard Association has a working group that is making recommendations for Hanover, MD changes to NGR 10-4. NGR 10-4 is the regulation which defines the relationship of Nov 18 – 21, 2015 State Defense Forces to the National Guard Bureau. SGAUS Chaplain Training Edinburgh, IN All State Defense Force Commanders should be involved in this NGR-10-4 analysis. This is a unique opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Federalism on the United States National Guard’S Emergency Response Mission
    The Duel Over Duality: Effects of Federalism on the United States National Guard’s Emergency Response Mission A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Public Administration School of Public Affairs University of Baltimore Baltimore, Maryland March, 2010 Copyright © 2010 by Aaron Sean Poynton All Rights Reserved ii The Duel Over Duality: Effects of Federalism on the United States National Guard’s Emergency Response Mission A Dissertation Submitted to Yale Gordon College of Liberal Arts, University of Baltimore in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Public Administration by Aaron Sean Poynton _____________________________________ Dr. John J. Callahan, Chair University of Baltimore ______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Lenneal Henderson, Member Dr. Lorenda Ann Naylor, Member University of Baltimore University of Baltimore ______________________________ Dr. Charles Barry, Outside Member National Defense University School of Public Affairs University of Baltimore Baltimore, Maryland March, 2010 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation represents the culminating point of a lifetime of academic preparation and it could not have been achieved alone. I am thankful for having the opportunity to study under the tutelage of admirable professors and for being lucky enough to have the loving support of family and friends. I would like to acknowledge and extend my heartfelt gratitude to several specific persons who have made the completion of this dissertation possible. First, I wish to express special thanks to Dr. John J. Callahan, my dissertation chair, for his vital encouragement, support, and guidance. Also, I would like to extend appreciation to my dissertation committee members, Dr. Lenneal Henderson, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • House Bill No. 871
    FIRST REGULAR SESSION [PERFECTED] HOUSE BILL NO. 871 99TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS. 1773H.01P D. ADAM CRUMBLISS, Chief Clerk AN ACT To repeal sections 41.050, 41.070, 41.080, 41.110, 41.450, 41.460, 41.490, and 41.500, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof eight new sections relating to the Missouri military code. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows: Section A. Sections 41.050, 41.070, 41.080, 41.110, 41.450, 41.460, 41.490, and 41.500, 2 RSMo, are repealed and eight new sections enacted in lieu thereof, to be known as sections 3 41.050, 41.070, 41.080, 41.110, 41.450, 41.460, 41.490, and 41.500, to read as follows: 41.050. The militia of the state shall include all able-bodied citizens and all other 2 able-bodied residents, who, in the case of the unorganized militia and the Missouri [reserve 3 military force] state defense force, shall be more than seventeen years of age and not more than 4 sixty-four, and such other persons as may upon their own application be enrolled or 5 commissioned therein, and who, in the case of the organized militia, shall be within the age 6 limits and possess the physical and mental qualifications prescribed by law or regulations for the 7 reserve components of the Armed Forces of the United States, except that this section shall not 8 be construed to require militia service of any persons specifically exempted by the laws of the 9 United States or the state of Missouri.
    [Show full text]