DOCSLIB.ORG

Universidade Federal Do Rio De Janeiro (Ufrj)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Universidade Federal Do Rio De Janeiro (Ufrj) UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO (UFRJ) CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS JURÍDICAS E ECONÔMICAS (CCJE) FACULDADE DE ADMINISTRAÇÃO E CIÊNCIAS CONTÁBEIS (FACC) CURSO DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E GESTÃO DE UNIDADE DE INFORMAÇÃO (CBG) LARISSA GUIMARÃES QUINTANILHA UM ESTUDO DA AUTORIA E DA AUTORIDADE NA WIKIPÉDIA Rio de Janeiro 2017 LARISSA GUIMARÃES QUINTANILHA UM ESTUDO DA AUTORIA E DA AUTORIDADE NA WIKIPÉDIA Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso apresentado ao Curso de Biblioteconomia e Gestão de Unidade de Informação da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, como requisito parcial à obtenção do título de bacharel em biblioteconomia. Orientadora: Prof.ª Dra. Marianna Zattar. Rio de Janeiro 2017 Q7e Quintanilha, Larissa Guimarães. Um estudo da autoria e da autoridade na Wikipédia. / Larissa Guimarães Quintanilha -- Rio de Janeiro, 2017. 62 f.: il. Orientadora: Marianna Zattar. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (graduação em Biblioteconomia) – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Faculdade de Administração e Ciências Contábeis, Curso de Biblioteconomia e Gestão de Unidade de Informação, 2017. 1. Fonte de informação. 2. Competência em mídia e em informação. 3. Autoria. 4. Autoridade. 5. Desinformação. 6. Wikipédia. I. Zattar, Marianna. II. Título. CDD 025.5 LARISSA GUIMARÃES QUINTANILHA UM ESTUDO DA AUTORIA E DA AUTORIDADE NA WIKIPÉDIA Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso apresentado ao Curso de Biblioteconomia e Gestão de Unidade de Informação da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, como requisito parcial à obtenção do título de bacharel em biblioteconomia. Rio de Janeiro, 15 de dezembro de 2017. ________________________________________________ Prof. M.e. Antonio Victor Botão. Curso de Biblioteconomia e Gestão de Unidade de Informação Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) ________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Márcio Gonçalves Faculdades Integradas Hélio Alonso (FACHA) Instituto Brasileiro de Mercado de Capitais (IBMEC) Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNESA) ________________________________________________ Profa. Dra. Marianna Zattar (orientadora) Curso de Biblioteconomia e Gestão de Unidade de Informação Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Ao meu Pai Elcio Feliciano Quintanilha, por toda paciência, dedicação e incentivo, que me fizeram chegar aonde cheguei e no que estou para conquistar. (In Memorian) AGRADECIMENTO À Deus por toda sua glória e por ter guiado os meus passos durante está difícil jornada na conquista da graduação. Ao meu Pai Elcio por ter sido meu amigo, conselheiro e incentivador das minhas escolhas, que se doou para que eu e minhas irmãs pudéssemos ter as melhores oportunidades. À minha Mãe Teresa pelo amor e dedicação. À minhas irmãs e meus familiares pelo apoio. À minha Vó Mirene que agradeço por todo carinho e apoio. À minha orientadora Marianna Zattar por toda paciência e dedicação na elaboração deste trabalho, por suas palavras de conforto durante um momento de angústia que me levaram a adiar por um tempo à este trabalho, mas que me trouxe palavras de incentivo para continuá-lo. Às minhas amigas de longa data e aos meus novos amigos que fiz durante esses 4 anos e 6 meses de faculdade, agradeço pelo compartilhamento das mesmas inseguranças, objetivos profissionais e de todo apoio oferecido. Ao meu amigo Gustavo por todo incentivo. Ao meu namorado Fábio por estar sempre ao meu lado em todos os momentos. Aos estágios que passei durante o período de faculdade, que me proporcionaram meu crescimento profissional e pessoal. À todo corpo docente pelo ensino, construção humana e profissional. Agradeço a todos que direta ou indiretamente contribuíram em algum momento para meu crescimento e para a concretização deste trabalho. “Se um artista, um lenhador e um botânico passearem pela mesma floresta, suas experiências serão muito diferentes. Cada um observará aquilo que lhe interessa. [...] Crenças, percepções e interesses limitados empobrecem o mundo, tornando-o previsível e insípido. Este mesmo mundo pode ser muito rico e estimulante. A diferença não está no mundo, e sim nos filtros por meio dos quais percebemos” (O’CONNOR, J; SEYMOUR, J, 1990, p. 22). RESUMO Apresenta um trabalho de conclusão de curso em Biblioteconomia e Gestão de Unidade de informação, que tem como objetivo estudar os aspectos relacionados à autoria e autoridade nos conteúdos dos verbetes da Wikipédia. Aponta, como uma das justificativas, a necessidade de práticas informacionais críticas com a avaliação de fontes de informação em contextos de desinformação e hiperinformação. Para isso, indica das temáticas referentes à autoria, coautoria e colaboração (Beatriz Martins, Samili Vanz e Ida Stumpf), fonte de informação (Lena Pinheiro, Murilo Cunha, Maria Inês Tomaél e Marta Valentim), competência em mídia e em informação (Arthur Bezerra, Regina Beluzzo, Bernadete Campello e Eli Pariser), desinformação (Vladimir Volkoff, Don Fallis, Vladimir Brito e Marta Pinheiro). Desenvolve uma pesquisa descritiva e exploratória em seu procedimento metodológico na elaboração da análise da autoria e da autoridade dos verbetes da Wikipédia, servindo como medidores na identificação da qualidade e veracidade com que são produzidos os verbetes. Apresenta como resultado, o surgimento das diferentes práticas de autoria e validação de autoridade como forma de avaliar uma fonte de informação. Conclui que a competência em informação é o principal aliado no combate a desinformação e a informação falsa. Palavras-chave: Fonte de informação. Competência em mídia e em informação. Autoria. Autoridade. Desinformação. Wikipédia. ABSTRACT It presents a final paper for Librarianship and Management of Information Unit course, which aims to study those related to authorship and authority in the contents of the Wikipedia entries. As one of the justifications, it points out a need for critical information practices with an evaluation of sources of information in contexts of disinformation and hyperinformation. In addition, it indicates the themes related to authorship, co-authorship and collaboration (Beatriz Martins, Samili Vanz and Ida Stumpf), source of information (Lena Pinheiro, Murilo Cunha, Maria Inês Tomaél and Marta Valentim), media and information literacy (Bezerra, Regina Beluzzo, Bernadette Campello and Eli Pariser), disinformation (Vladimir Volkoff, Don Fallis, Vladimir Brito and Marta Pinheiro). It develops a descriptive and exploratory research in its methodological procedure in the elaboration of the analysis of the authorship and the authority of the articles of Wikipedia, serving as meters in the identification of the quality and veracity with the entries are produced. It presents as a result, the emergence of the different practices of authoring and validation of authority as a form of evaluation a source of information. It concludes that information literacy is the main ally in combating disinformation and false information. Keywords: Information sources. Media and information literacy. Authorship. Authority. Disinformation. Wikipédia. LISTA DE ABREVIATURAS E SIGLAS ALA American Library Association AMI Avaliação Global da Alfabetização Midiática e Informacional COINFO Competência em Informação GLAM Galleries, Libraries, Archives & Museums GNU Free Documentation License GPL General Public License IBICT Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia IFAP The Information for All Programme IFLA Federação Internacional das Associações e Bibliotecários e de Bibliotecas IP Internet Protocol PBM Pesquisa Brasileira de Mídia SPAM Sending and Posting Advertisement and Unwanted Information in Mass TIC Tecnologia de Informação e Comunicação UNESCO Organização das Nações Unidas para Educação, a Ciência e a Cultura. LISTA DE ILUSTRAÇÃO Quadro 1 - Permissão de nível de acesso para os participantes do projeto Wikipédia............. 39 Figura 1 - Busca pelo termo "autoria" .................................................................................... 42 Figura 2 - Remissiva de autoria .............................................................................................. 43 Figura 3 - Aba de discussão (direito autoral) ......................................................................... 43 Figura 4 - Definição de autor .................................................................................................. 44 Figura 5 - Lista de discussão (autor) ...................................................................................... 45 Figura 6 - Busca do termo (coautoria) .................................................................................... 45 Figura 7 - Resultado da busca (coautoria) .............................................................................. 46 Figura 8 - Colaboração ........................................................................................................... 46 Figura 9 - Colaboração (discussão do conteúdo) ................................................................... 47 Figura 10 - Verbete de fonte de informação ............................................................................. 48 Figura 11 - Fonte (jornalismo) da aba de discussão ................................................................. 48 Figura 12 - Resultado de pesquisa (competência em informação) ...........................................49 Figura 13 - Competência (informacional) ................................................................................ 50 Figura 14 - Aba de discussão "competência (informacional)" ................................................. 50 Figura 15 - Desinformação .......................................................................................................51
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Knihovny Současnosti 2016
    Sdružení knihoven ČR Ústřední knihovnická rada ČR Knihovny současnosti 2016 Sborník z 24. ročníku knihovnické konference, konané pod záštitou Mgr. Daniela Hermana, ministra kultury ČR, a Ing. Jiřího Rozbořila, hejtmana Olomouckého kraje, pořádané ve dnech 6.–8. září 2016 v areálu Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci Prosinec 2016 Vydáno za finanční podpory Ministerstva kultury v rámci dotačního programu Knihovny 21. století. © Sdružení knihoven ČR, Praha 2016 Konference se konala pod záštitou Mgr. Daniela Hermana, ministra kultury ČR, a Ing. Jiřího Rozbořila, hejtmana Olomouckého kraje. OBSAH Úvodní slovo .......................................................................................... 8 Jak to vidí jinde .......................................................................................... 9 Úvod ...................................................................................................... 10 Inga Lundén: Všechno je o důvěře. Knihovny tvoří kompaktní města ...................................................................................................... 11 Knihovna jako vzdělávací instituce ...................................................... 21 Úvodní slovo k sekci „Knihovna jako vzdělávací instituce“ ......... 22 Mgr. Pavlína Mazáčová, Ph.D.: Inkluzivní přístup k edukaci informační gramotnosti v praxi učícího knihovníka ...................... 24 PhDr. Martin Krčál: Spolupráce knihoven a středních škol .......... 38 Mgr. et Mgr. Zuzana Teplíková: Vzdělávací aktivity Citace.com pro knihovny .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For the Field
    For the Field Of the People, For the People: Exploring Wikipedia as a Site for Community Building Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened the need for equal access to factual information about the virus. Free and open sources of information are increasingly important in our digital age. Although Wikipedia has often been touted as an unreliable source in the academic context, it can provide a great starting place for those interested in researching a given topic. Additionally, due to its inherently collaborative structure, this could be a site to help build community or extend an existing community, from the physical into the digital. Through a brief examination of the player/editor created and maintained Nukapedia, a wiki-site hosted by Fandom.com and dedicated to the videogame Fallout 4, I will demonstrate that a community can be formed even through asynchronous editing projects. I have experienced the power of this game in building community as a long-time fan of this series who has played through three of its titles: Fallout: New Vegas, Fallout 3, and Fallout 4. My long-time partner and I even had out first “official date” on the midnight release of Fallout 4 at our local EB Games. Although I am not an especially talented videogame player, I do enjoy the storylines and aesthetic of its fictional world. These collaborative projects based on collecting, organizing, and sharing knowledge can be employed by library professionals for community programming. As mentioned by Snyder in Edit-a-thons and Beyond (2018), organizing “edit-a-thon Emerging Library & Information Perspectives 1 events” can be a way to meet institutional goals and even engage with new patrons.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Jahre Wikipedia Pressemappe
    20 Jahre Wikipedia Pressemappe Inhalt Pressemitteilung 2 Facts & Fun 4 Geburt einer Online-Enzyklopädie 4 Eine niemals fertige Enzyklopädie 4 Wer schreibt Wikipedia 6 Real Life 7 Von Mängeln zu Exzellenz 8 Sprachvielfalt 9 Mehr als Worte 10 Freies Wissen: die Idee dahinter 11 Kontakt & Gesprächspartner*innen 12 Datum: 17. Dezember 2020 Pressemitteilung Wikipedia wird 20 Aktivitäten rund um den Enzyklopädie-Geburtstag am 15. Jänner mit Österreich-Bezug Die Online-Enzyklopädie Wikipedia feiert am 15. Jänner 2021 einen runden Geburtstag. An diesem Tag vor zwanzig Jahren ging die englische Sprachversion online, die deutsche folgte bereits am 16. März 2001. Seitdem wurden fast 52 Millionen Wikipedia-Artikel veröffentlicht und der freie Zugang zu Wissen revolutioniert. In Österreich wird das Jubiläumsjahr mit einer Reihe von Aktivitäten begangen. Während der deutschsprachige Wikipedia-Artikel zur COVID-19-Pandemie inzwischen weit über 5,3 Millionen Seitenaufrufe verzeichnet, setzt die Online-Enzyklopädie bei ihren Feierlichkeiten auf einen Remote-Zugang. Die Wikipedia-Aktiven beschenken sich gegenseitig bei einem Engerl-Bengerl-Spiel. Dabei dürfen sie sich bestimmte neue oder überarbeitete Wikipedia-Artikel wünschen und erfahren am 15. Jänner, wer den Wunsch erfüllt hat – vorausgesetzt eigener Wikipedia-Beiträge für jemand anders. Auch ohne jede aktive Wikipedia-Erfahrung lässt es sich am 15. Jänner ab 17 Uhr mitteleuropäischer Zeit bei einem globalen YouTube-Livestream mitfeiern, bei dem Wikipedia-Gründer Jimmy Wales die letzten zwanzig Jahre Revue passieren lässt und einen Blick in die Zukunft wagt. Eine virtuelle Ausstellung der Deutschen Digitalen Bibliothek, die am 16. März veröffentlicht wird, versammelt zwanzig Objekte aus der Wikipedia-Geschichte in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz und dazugehörige persönliche Geschichten.
    [Show full text]
  • Blind Trust Is Not Enough”: Considering Practical Verifiability and Open Referencing in Wikipedia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies Perspective “Blind Trust is Not Enough”: Considering Practical Verifiability and Open Referencing in Wikipedia Cal Murgu and Krisandra Ivings ABSTRACT This article draws attention to the often-unseen information inequalities that occur in the way that Wikipedia content is referenced. Drawing on digital information control and virtual gatekeeping scholarship, we contend that by not considering the degree to which references are practically accessible and verifiable, Wikipedia editors are implicitly promoting a control mechanism that is limiting the potential of Wikipedia to serve, as Willinsky puts it, “as a gateway to a larger world of knowledge.” We question the widespread practice of referencing peer-reviewed literature that is obscured by prohibitive paywalls. As we see it, two groups are disadvantaged by this practice. First, Wikipedia editors who lack access to the most current scholarly literature are unable to verify a reference or confirm the veracity of a fact or figure. Second, and perhaps most important, general readers are left with two unsatisfactory options in this scenario: they can either trust the authority of the citation or pay to access the article. Building on Don Fallis’ work on epistemic consequences of Wikipedia, this paper contends that promoting practically verifiable references would work to mitigate these inequalities and considers how relatively new initiatives could be used to improve the quality and utility of Wikipedia more generally. Murgu, Cal and Krisandra Ivings. “’Blind Trust is Not Enough’: Considering Practical Verifiability and Open Referencing in Wikipedia,” in “Information/Control: Control in the Age of Post-Truth,” eds.
    [Show full text]
  • Citations Needed: Build Your Wikipedia Skills While Building the World’S Encyclopedia
    A companion guide to deepen your learning during the WebJunction webinar on January 10, 2018, at 3:00 pm EST Citations Needed: Build Your Wikipedia Skills While Building the World’s Encyclopedia A glimpse into the inner workings of English Wikipedia for information professionals The Five Pillars of Wikipedia What are the ways in which the five pillars of Wikipedia align 1. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with the mission of libraries? 2. It is written from a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) 3. It’s free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute 4. Editors should treat each other with respect and civility 5. Wikipedia has no firm rules Learn about what U.S. public library staff are doing with Wikipedia in the WebJunction series Librarians Who Wikipedia List two (or more) insights you’ve gained about how Wikipedia editing works, such as the color-coded peer assessments that are shown in the chart below. 1. 2. How does learning about Wikipedia’s inner workings help you evaluate the quality of articles? Wikipedia’s articles are in a constant state of development, learn more about quality assessments made by other editors 1 | P a g e OCLC Wikipedia + Libraries: Better Together About the #1lib1ref campaign (and how you and your library can participate) What is the #1lib1ref campaign? How can you participate? How can your library participate? #1lib1ref The Wikipedia Library’s annual It’s easy! Follow the steps on Plan a #1lib1ref event for your #1lib1ref (“One Librarian, One pages three and four to insert a library, Wikipedia is better with Reference”) global campaign reference as a footnote citation.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia and Libraries
    Wikipedia @ 20 Wikipedia and Libraries Phoebe Ayers Published on: Jun 11, 2019 Updated on: Sep 15, 2019 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Wikipedia @ 20 Wikipedia and Libraries image credit: Pdx.leecat. “Wikipedia Loves Libraries at Multnomah County (OR) Library.” 2012. CC-BY-SA. I am a librarian, and a Wikipedia editor. One identity is professional, the other a late-night hobby, but they are two approaches to the same goal: sharing knowledge with the world. Wikipedia and libraries have similar aspirations and goals. They both exist to help people who are looking for information, and they both help curate our society’s memory and community. And despite their different cultures and Wikipedia’s upstart nature, today there are hundreds of collaborations between librarians and Wikipedians to build the future of open knowledge. In the areas in which libraries and librarians have participated in Wikipedia, I see three overriding themes that relate to the future of Wikipedia: quality, inclusiveness, and sustainability. In each of these areas, both institutions and individual librarians have already done tremendous work and have a future role to play. It is not a one-way street, either: the aspirations, idealistic values and joy of the Wikipedia project can also help make the ancient profession of librarianship better, even as we critique and improve Wikipedia. My story is about building the future of the world’s greatest reference work. It is about libraries and Wikipedia, and what it is like to be an author of an encyclopedia, and about being part of a community, and those three things are, for me, inseparable.
    [Show full text]
  • Revistă De Bibliologie Și Știința Informării
    BibliotecaRevistă de bibliologie și știința informării 2 / 2020 Biblioteca Revistă bimensuală Editată de Biblioteca Naţională a României UMAR Anul înfiinţării: 1948 S SUMMARy Anul LXXII. Serie nouă, Anul XXXI EDITORIAL EDITORIAL Numărul 2/2020 Fără bibliotecă nu există civilizație There is No Civilization without a Library Elena Dobrescu ........................................................p. 1 Elena Dobrescu ........................................................p. 1 COLEGIUL EDITORIAL: REPERE PROFESIONALE. METODOLOGIE comitet ştiinţific highLights on Librarianship. prof. univ. dr. Doina banciu Wikipedia în educația universitară și Library gUiDeLines prof. univ. dr. agnes erich rolul bibliotecarului de referințe Wikipedia in Higher Education and lect. univ. dr. maria micle Lenuța Ursachi ........................................................p. 3 the Role of Reference Librarian elena Pintilei Vedeta de autor nume japonez Lenuța Ursachi ........................................................p. 3 conf. univ. dr. cristina PoPescu Cristina Marinescu ..................................................p. 9 Authorithy Heading - Japanese Name prof. univ. dr. angela rePanovici viaţa bibLioteCiLor Cristina Marinescu ..................................................p. 9 prof. univ. dr. elena tîrziman on roManian Libraries acad. Florin FiliP Serviciul Referințe al Bibliotecii Centrale prof. univ. dr. zanFir ilie Universitare „Carol I” - necesitatea reinventării Reference Services of the Central University prof. univ. dr. mircea regneală Corina
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Annual Plan Grant
    Simple Annual Plan Grant Wikimedia Australia 2020-21 Final report Program story Contracting an inaugural Wikimedia Australia Executive Officer Executive Officer Caddie Brain After nearly 13 years operating with only a volunteer committee, 2020-21 saw a significant milestone for the Wikimedia movement in Australia with the contracting of WMAU’s first staff member, a Community Support and Outreach Coordinator. In order to grow, increase partnerships and professionalise its operations, WMAU required additional support to coordinate its community development and outreach work. Since the chapter was established in 2007, the small managing committee has carried responsibility for governance, community engagement activities and communications. While successful to this point, the committee had reached the limit of its ability to continue to grow operations on an entirely volunteer basis. The Community Support and Outreach Coordinator role was a three-month short-term contract position approximately 15 hours per week that managed communications, volunteer engagement and development, and general administration for the WMAU committee and wider community. At the midterm review of progress against the WMAU Annual Plan 2020-21, there were many identified activities within the budget that could not proceed due to COVID-19 pandemic-related travel restrictions. WMAU reallocated AUD$10,000 to establish the Community Support and Outreach Coordinator. This pilot funding enabled both the committee and the coordinator to establish working arrangements and informed WMAU’s annual plan and budget for 2021-22. WMAU contracted experienced Wikimedian Caddie Brain, who is well- recognised in the community and familiar with Wikimedia Australia events and operations, to establish the duties and procedures within the interim role.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia @ 20
    Wikipedia @ 20 Wikipedia @ 20 Stories of an Incomplete Revolution Edited by Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2020 Massachusetts Institute of Technology This work is subject to a Creative Commons CC BY- NC 4.0 license. Subject to such license, all rights are reserved. The open access edition of this book was made possible by generous funding from Knowledge Unlatched, Northeastern University Communication Studies Department, and Wikimedia Foundation. This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans by Westchester Publishing Ser vices. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Reagle, Joseph, editor. | Koerner, Jackie, editor. Title: Wikipedia @ 20 : stories of an incomplete revolution / edited by Joseph M. Reagle and Jackie Koerner. Other titles: Wikipedia at 20 Description: Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press, [2020] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2020000804 | ISBN 9780262538176 (paperback) Subjects: LCSH: Wikipedia--History. Classification: LCC AE100 .W54 2020 | DDC 030--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020000804 Contents Preface ix Introduction: Connections 1 Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner I Hindsight 1 The Many (Reported) Deaths of Wikipedia 9 Joseph Reagle 2 From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia’s First Two Decades 21 Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison 3 From Utopia to Practice and Back 43 Yochai Benkler 4 An Encyclopedia with Breaking News 55 Brian Keegan 5 Paid with Interest: COI Editing and Its Discontents 71 William Beutler II Connection 6 Wikipedia and Libraries 89 Phoebe Ayers 7 Three Links: Be Bold, Assume Good Faith, and There Are No Firm Rules 107 Rebecca Thorndike- Breeze, Cecelia A.
    [Show full text]
  • Criticism of Wikipedia from Wikipidia.Pdf
    Criticism of Wikipedia from Wikipidia For a list of criticisms of Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Criticisms. See also Wikipedia:Replies to common objections. Two radically different versions of a Wikipedia biography, presented to the public within days of each other: Wikipedia's susceptibility to edit wars and bias is one of the issues raised by Wikipedia critics http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Criticism%20of%20Wikipedia%20from%20Wikipidia.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Examples%20of%20Bias%20in%20Wikipedia.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Wikipedia%20is%20Run%20by%20Latent%20Homosexual%20Homophob ics.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Bigotry%20and%20Bias%20in%20Wikipedia.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Dear%20Wikipedia%20on%20Libelous%20lies%20against%20Desire%20 Dubounet.pdf http://medicalexposedownloads.com/PDF/Desir%c3%a9%20Dubounet%20Wikipidia%20text.pdf Criticism of Wikipedia—of the content, procedures, and operations, and of the Wikipedia community—covers many subjects, topics, and themes about the nature of Wikipedia as an open source encyclopedia of subject entries that almost anyone can edit. Wikipedia has been criticized for the uneven handling, acceptance, and retention of articles about controversial subjects. The principal concerns of the critics are the factual reliability of the content; the readability of the prose; and a clear article layout; the existence of systemic bias; of gender bias; and of racial bias among the editorial community that is Wikipedia. Further concerns are that the organization allows the participation of anonymous editors (leading to editorial vandalism); the existence of social stratification (allowing cliques); and over-complicated rules (allowing editorial quarrels), which conditions permit the misuse of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is described as unreliable at times.
    [Show full text]
  • 6€€€€Wikipedia and Libraries
    Wikipedia @ 20 • ::Wikipedia @ 20 6 Wikipedia and Libraries Phoebe Ayers Published on: Oct 15, 2020 Updated on: Nov 16, 2020 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0) Wikipedia @ 20 • ::Wikipedia @ 20 6 Wikipedia and Libraries Wikipedia is pushing the venerable field of librarianship to recognize a lesson of the twenty-first century: making knowledge accessible to all requires Wikipedians, librarians, academics, and citizens to work together in collaboration and community. I am a librarian and a Wikipedia editor. One identity is professional, the other a late-night hobby, but they are two approaches to the same goal: sharing knowledge with the world. Wikipedia and libraries have similar aspirations and goals. They both exist to help people who are looking for information, and they both help curate our society’s memory and community. And despite their different cultures and Wikipedia’s upstart nature, today there are hundreds of collaborations between librarians and Wikipedians to build the future of open knowledge. In the areas in which libraries and librarians have participated in Wikipedia, I see three overriding themes that relate to the future of Wikipedia: quality, inclusiveness, and sustainability. In each of these areas, both institutions and individual librarians have already done tremendous work and have a future role to play. It is not a one-way street, either: the aspirations, idealistic values, and joy of the Wikipedia project can also help make the ancient profession of librarianship better, even as we critique and improve Wikipedia. My story is about building the future of the world’s greatest reference work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomy of Knowledge Gaps for Wikimedia Projects (Second Draft)
    A Taxonomy of Knowledge Gaps for Wikimedia Projects (Second Draft) MIRIAM REDI, Wikimedia Foundation MARTIN GERLACH, Wikimedia Foundation ISAAC JOHNSON, Wikimedia Foundation JONATHAN MORGAN, Wikimedia Foundation LEILA ZIA, Wikimedia Foundation arXiv:2008.12314v2 [cs.CY] 29 Jan 2021 2 Miriam Redi, Martin Gerlach, Isaac Johnson, Jonathan Morgan, and Leila Zia EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In January 2019, prompted by the Wikimedia Movement’s 2030 strategic direction [108], the Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation1 identified the need to develop a knowledge gaps index—a composite index to support the decision makers across the Wikimedia movement by providing: a framework to encourage structured and targeted brainstorming discussions; data on the state of the knowledge gaps across the Wikimedia projects that can inform decision making and assist with measuring the long term impact of large scale initiatives in the Movement. After its first release in July 2020, the Research team has developed the second complete draft of a taxonomy of knowledge gaps for the Wikimedia projects, as the first step towards building the knowledge gap index. We studied more than 250 references by scholars, researchers, practi- tioners, community members and affiliates—exposing evidence of knowledge gaps in readership, contributorship, and content of Wikimedia projects. We elaborated the findings and compiled the taxonomy of knowledge gaps in this paper, where we describe, group and classify knowledge gaps into a structured framework. The taxonomy that you will learn more about in the rest of this work will serve as a basis to operationalize and quantify knowledge equity, one of the two 2030 strategic directions, through the knowledge gaps index.
    [Show full text]