DOCSLIB.ORG

Federation – Wide Internal Situation Update No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federation – Wide Internal Situation Update No Federation – Wide Internal Situation Update No. 44 POPULATION MOVEMENT OPERATION Reporting Period: 1 to 31 January 2019 PSS support for children through fun activities in camp 13. Source: BDRCS Key Highlights • Since 1 January 2019, BDRCS started managing the field hospital. The hospital is renamed as ‘Bangladesh Red Crescent society Hospital’ and run by Bangladeshi qualified nurses and doctors with 10 bed facilities. Until 31 March 2019, it will be running as transitional hospital. Eye, Dental and surgical section, obstetrics and gynae have been planned to start from 1 April 2019. At present, one Hospital Manager, six doctors, 12 Nurses, one Admin & Finance officer, one Pharmacist, one NDRT member, one Electrical Engineer, two Lab Technicians, one X-Ray Technicians, six Porters, eight Cleaners, four Tech team members, six Cooks and one laundry man are working for the hospital. • German Red Cross is in process of identifying land for 500 midterm shelters in camp 19, 20 and 20 Ext. and defining the design of midterm shelters. • Since November 2018, BDRCS with support from IFRC provided LPG tanks and refilling to 873 households in camp 11-A. • The 2019 Joint Response Plan (JRP) has been launched in January on behalf of Strategic Executive Group and partners active in Cox’s Bazar. The plan shows a collective requirement of USD 920.5 million to maintain priority responses to approximately 1.2 million people in the camp and host communities. Food security is the area that requires most support, which is followed by WASH, shelter, site management and health areas. The plan emphasises on key cross cutting issues to focus within and between sectors which are protection and gender mainstreaming, environment and eco-system rehabilitation, social cohesion, and natural disaster preparedness. Partners who have contributed to the IFRC Emergency Appeal are: American Red Cross, Australian Red Cross, Austrian Red Cross, Bahrain Red Crescent, Belgian Red Cross, British Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross, Red Cross Society of China Macau branch, Danish Red Cross, Finnish Red Cross, German Red Cross, Hong Kong branch of the Red Cross Society of China, the Iranian Red Crescent, Italian Red Cross, Japanese Red Cross Society, Luxembourg Red Cross, Maldivian Red Crescent, Netherlands Red Cross, New Zealand Red Cross, Norwegian Red Cross, Red Cross of Monaco, Republic of Korea National Red Cross, Singapore Red Cross, Spanish Red Cross, Swedish Red Cross, Swiss Red Cross, Taiwan Red Cross Organization and Turkish Red Crescent. The German Red Cross, Italian Red Cross, the Iranian Red Crescent, Kuwait Red Crescent, Swiss Red Cross, Qatar Red Crescent and the United Arab Emirates Red Crescent contributed to the BDRCS activities through bilateral channels. Situation Overview As of January 2019, more than 900,000 people from Rakhine State live in 34 extremely congested camps, located in Ukhiya and Teknaf sub-district of Cox’s Bazar district. Approximately 626,500 people stay only in Kutupalong-Balukhali expansion. Since January 2018, there are more than 16,000 new arrivals. On Jan 8, the State Minister for Foreign Affairs, Shahriar Alam, stated that the Government of Bangladesh (GoB) will continue to address the crisis whilst also expressing his “hope that the Rohingya repatriation process, based on the agreed list of verified Rohingyas, will begin soon” – no further timeframe was given. The UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar visited Bangladesh and, in her statement, she commended the efforts of the Government of Bangladesh to develop the island but stressed that “no relocation should even be contemplated until a framework to protect any refugees who do relocate is agreed upon”. She further stated the need to fully involve the displaced in the decision to relocate in the form of ‘go and see’ visits emphasizing that there must be voluntary, informed consent, freedom of movement and called on the GoB to release “feasibility studies it has undertaken and to allow the UN to carry out a full technical and humanitarian assessment, including a security assessment, before making any further plans for the housing of people on the island.” The GoB has stated that relocation of people from Rakhine to Bhasan Char is a priority, with the State Minister for Disaster and Relief Management stating that the relocation of 23,000 families would be completed by April 15, 2019. There has been a reported increase in attacks against the female population working and living in the camps. It concerns women from the displaced community in general and female volunteers and NGO staff. Men have also been targeted where they have been seen to support women accessing work and educational opportunities. The BDRCS and Red Cross partners have been impacted, in certain camps female volunteers are not going to work and there have been reported incidents of harassment. IFRC and BDRCS are working with the sector to report incidents and take appropriate actions to ensure the safety of our volunteers/staff and the continuation of our operations. The Government of Bangladesh has been engaged as this is an issue of respect for humanitarian workers and principles. The GoB is ultimately responsible for the overall safety and security in the camps. The host community in Cox’s Bazar has been holding a series of protests and demonstrations over employment practices of NGOs which started peaceful but have turned increasingly hostile. On Jan 14 and 17, peaceful protests were held on the loss of jobs as some local NGO staff were released from their contracts at the end of last year (because projects have ended or are being transferred to national actors). Furthermore, several hundred people have lost their jobs mainly in the health sector due to the rationalization of services. The current situation remains severe as the displaced population continue to face threats. They live in congested sites that impact all aspects of living and are ill-equipped to handle the monsoon rains and upcoming cyclone season– with alarmingly limited options for evacuation. Needs and Operational Environment Overarching Considerations Current needs: • Access to quality protection and assistance is vital, particularly for adolescent girls and women including psychosocial support for all people affected. One of the most pressing issues that needs to be addressed is incidents of gender-based violence (GBV) and abuse taking place in the camp population. GBV prevention mechanisms need to be strengthened, including GBV case management, counter-trafficking programming and psychosocial support for children and adults. Community-based protection interventions and efforts to ensure safety and security in the camps, including basic requirements such as lighting, presence of law enforcement authorities and access to justice, require continuous strengthening by all actors. • The protection sector working group in Cox’s Bazar, which RCRC is part of, set strategy to address women security is to focus on constructive engagement with authorities, expand community-based engagement with men, boys, religious leaders, and opinion makers alongside ongoing community and women empowerment initiatives and evidence-based protection analysis and timely interventions 2 • For unaccompanied and separated children (UASC), there is an urgent need for robust, family-based alternative care arrangement. • In 2019, disaster risk reduction and disaster preparedness will build on both achievements and lessons learned during the cyclone and monsoon seasons of 2018. Across sectors, improved quality of facilities is needed to enhance weather resilience and sustainability. • The number of people from Rakhine State has almost tripled the total population in Ukhiya and Teknaf Upazilas, with sizable consequences for the environment and livelihoods of Bangladeshi residents — as well as significant new development opportunities that have yet to be maximized. The influx of one million people has significant impact on fragile forest and land resources. So, there is a need to continue addressing concerns of the local population under the leadership of the Government and the local authorities. • A recent survey conducted by IOM and the UNHCR collected feedback from 12,373 people regarding WASH in camps 8W, 9, 10, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 and 24 and summarized the following six major concerns and needs: - Insufficient number of tube wells, toilets, washrooms, drains, and dustbins. - Women, children and older people are particularly struggling with washrooms and toilet access due to distance, privacy, and safety concerns. - Most of the toilets, drains and dustbins need better maintenance and regular cleaning. - Collecting water from shallow tube wells is very difficult during the winter with lower water levels. - Community members are suffering from various water – and air-borne diseases and skin diseases because of a lack of access to WASH facilities. - Women face issues with disposing of menstrual hygiene products and lack of adequate facilities. Operational Challenges and mitigation Sector specific challenges: Amongst the many challenges within the operation, the following have been identified in the last month: • Shelter: Local political leaders in host communities in Palongkhali Union (Ward no. 5 and 6) attempted to influence the selection of vulnerable households that need shelter improvement and it led to confusion among the community people regarding the process. Dialogue with public representatives (Ward commissioners) and government executive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recovery Matters Recovery Matters WORKPLACE WORKSHOP WORKPLACE WORKSHOP
    recovery matters recovery matters WORKPLACE WORKSHOP WORKPLACE WORKSHOP WORKPLACE www.redcross.org.nz 0800 RED CROSS facebook.com/NewZealandRedCross Psychosocial Support @NZRedCross Acknowledgements Red Cross kindly thanks all those involved in the planning, development and review of this resource. Special thank you to Australian Red Cross for sharing their knowledge, materials and guidance. New Zealand Red Cross acknowledges the contributions and materials provided by the following: The International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support; All Right?; Anne Leadbeater (Office of the Emergency Services Commissioner, Victoria); Jemima Richards and Kate Riddell (Firefoxes); The Hull Flood Project, UK; Guy Fredricks; Frank Film; Paua Productions; Australian Broadcasting Agency; The Guardian; Tom Scott. Thank you to the following people and organisations for sharing their knowledge and reviewing the content of this resource: Dr Rob Gordon; Dr Sarb Johal (Joint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University); Dr Caroline Bell (Mental Health Clinical Research, University of Otago); Maureen Mooney (Joint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University); Mike Moss (St John of God Waipuna); Graham Allan (Mental Health and Addiction Services, Canterbury District Health Board); Ciaran Fox (Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand); Kerri Bonner (Youthline); Shirley Wright (Christchurch Resettlement Services); Cameron Scott (Disability Services, Christchurch City Council); Trisha Ventom (IHC); Kate van Heugten (Department of Human Services and Social Work, University of Canterbury); Yvonne Gray (New Zealand Red Cross). Jolie Wills and Holly Griffin are the principal creators of the Recovery Matters psychosocial training resources. Holly Griffin is the principal author of this workbook. New Zealand Red Cross material The material contained in this resource is the intellectual property of New Zealand Red Cross.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka : Emergency Appeal N° MDRLK002 Support for Internally Operations Update N° 10 16 February 2012 Displaced People
    Sri Lanka : Emergency appeal n° MDRLK002 Support for internally Operations update n° 10 16 February 2012 displaced people Period covered by this operations update: 13 October 2011 to 12 January 2012 Appeal target (current): CHF 6.17 million <click here to view the interim financial report> Appeal coverage: 98 per cent based on current revised appeal budget. <click here for the donors’ response list or here for contact details> Appeal history: This Emergency Appeal was initially launched on a preliminary basis on 12 April 2010 for CHF 3,604,299 (USD 3,382,480 or EUR 2,504, 250) for 24 months to assist The first training on Psychosocial Support Programming under Red Cross Post-Conflict Recovery Programme was conducted with the participation 5,000 families. of 30 volunteers of Kilinochchi and Mulathivu branches in Vavuniya in December 2011. Photo: IFRC. The revised emergency appeal was launched in July 2011 seeking CHF 6.17 million in cash, kind, or services to support the Sri Lanka Red Cross Society (SLRCS) to assist at least 7,000 families (35,000 people) for 36 months, and planned to complete by 12 April 2013. A Final Report will be made available by 12 July 2013 (three months after the end of the operation). In brief Programme purpose: Restore and support SLRCS branch structure in northern and eastern regions of Sri Lanka, increase SLRCS‟s capacity in local community and civil society through the branches as well as Red Cross Red Crescent‟s capacity to address the most urgent situations of vulnerability. Support the returning population in shelter and livelihood to restore the living environment, in health and care, and water, sanitation and hygiene promotion to reduce the number of deaths, illnesses and impact from diseases and public health emergencies, and in disaster management to reduce the number of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters by enhancing coping capacities.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Data During an Emergency Catherine Burns Database & Supporter Care Manager New Zealand Red Cross
    Dealing with Data During an Emergency Catherine Burns Database & Supporter Care Manager New Zealand Red Cross #bbcon2017 Social Goodness @NZRedCross @nzredcross Facebook.com/NewZealandRedCross linkedin.com/in/catherine-burns-b742a9a7 #bbcon2017 Random fact about me Most Saturday nights, and for 24 hours in most holiday weekends, you will find me playing strategy board games with my friends and Wellington On Board members. https://boardgamegeek.com/user/KiwiCat #bbcon2017 New Zealand Red Cross Fundraising environment #bbcon2017 Red Cross and Raiser’s Edge Date Status 2013 June Went live with Raiser’s Edge combining two databases into one. 2014 October Raiser’s Edge database moved from National Office server to a private Red Cross cloud. It could only be accessed from within the Red Cross network/firewall. 2016 January Started detailed business continuity planning across the organisation and identified lack of remote access to Raiser’s Edge as a critical issue. 2016 February One remote computer was set up in Hamilton with Raiser’s Edge installed so we could process monthly payments remotely if necessary. This required a double remote desktop connection to access from outside the Red Cross network. 2016 March Added move to Blackbaud hosting to budget and business plan for the 2016/17 FY. Not scheduled due to lack of buy in from Red Cross IT to provide data and any additional support required for the transition. 2016 November We had ten Raiser’s Edge users at National Office in Wellington plus four community fundraising staff and one planned giving officer located in other parts of the country with access to Raiser’s Edge.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteering in Emergencies: Practical Guidelines for Red Cross
    Volunteering in emergencies Practical guidelines for Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies managing volunteers in emergency situations How we work Strategy 2020 voices the collective determination of the IFRC to move forward in tackling the major challenges that confront humanity in the next decade. Informed by the needs and vulnerabilities of the diverse communities with whom we work, as well as the basic rights and freedoms to which all are entitled, this strategy seeks to benefit all who look to Red Cross Red Crescent to help to build a more humane, dignified, and peaceful world. Over the next ten years, the collective focus of the IFRC will be on achieving the following strategic aims: 1. Save lives, protect livelihoods, and strengthen recovery from disasters and crises 2. Enable healthy and safe living 3. Promote social inclusion and a culture of non-violence and peace © International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, 2012 Any part of this publication may be cited, copied, translated into other languages or adapted to meet local needs without prior permission from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, provided that the source is clearly stated. Requests for commercial reproduction should be directed to the IFRC at [email protected] All photos used in this study are copyright of the IFRC unless otherwise indicated. Cover photo: IFRC During the Myanmar Cyclone Nargis, the winds and the tide lifted up the family’s boat and smashed it into their house, which collapsed. Myanmar Red Cross volunteer and community-based first aid trainer Nyi Nyi Zaw and his family jumped on board the boat, which then P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices Turkish Red Crescent 2021
    TURKISH RED CRESCENT MIGRATION SERVICES DIRECTORATE BEST PRACTICES 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Foreword…………………………….............................................................……..3 II. Emergency Social Safety Net (ESSN) – KIZILAYKART.………......……4 III. Community Based Migration Programmes……………….…………….. 10 IV. Child Programmes…………………............................................................ 16 2 I. Foreword More than a century and a half of history, the Turkish Red Crescent (TRC) has been fighting against the global diseases, effects of war, natural disasters, earthquakes, famine, and poverty whilst representing mercy and compassion all over the world. One of the primary objectives of Turkish Red Crescent is to empower individuals, and thus the society to alleviate the human suffering caused by diseases, disasters and poverty. The Turkish Red Crescent is the largest humanitarian organization in Turkey with 541 branches and over 11000 staff countrywide. Turkish Red Crescent is the sole host and operational Movement actor in the country, and works closely with the relevant Turkish government ministries, local authorities, disaster response, and migration management agencies in line with its assigned mandate and duties. Due to the continuing conflict in Syria, Turkey remains host to some 5 million refugees within its borders, including nationals from Syria, Somalia, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan – making it the country with the largest refugee population in the world. Given the protracted nature of the crisis, interventions seek to
    [Show full text]
  • MRC Activities Update
    ANNUAL REPORT From 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2010 Issued: 16 April 2011 MRC ANNUAL REPORT 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Page 3 RECOGNITION BY ICRC AND IFRC MEMBERSHIP -----------------------------------Page 3 GOVERNANCE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------Page 3 SECOND GENERAL ASSEMBLY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Page 3 STATUTORY BODIES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Page 3 MANAGEMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR MRC ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 HUMAN RESOURCES AND CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT ---------------------------------------------- Page 4 FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 6 COMMUNICATIONS--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 RESOURCE MOBILIZATION------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 7 MEMBERSHIP AND VOLUNTEERS----------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 EXTERNAL RELATIONS AND PARTNERSHIPS---------------------------------------------------------- Page 9 BRANCH DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRAMMES------------------------------------------------------- Page 11
    [Show full text]
  • International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement Family Links Network Code of Conduct on Data Protection
    International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement Family Links Network Code of Conduct on Data Protection Version 1.0 November 2015 International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement Family Links Network Code of Conduct _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Foreword This Code of Conduct (CoC) was drafted by a working group composed of representatives of the Austrian Red Cross (Claire Schocher-Döring), Belgian Red Cross (Flanders) (Axel Vande Veegaete, Nadia Terweduwe), British Red Cross (Mark Baynham and Emily Knox), German Red Cross (Jutta Hermanns), Red Cross EU Office (Olivier Jenard), International Committee of the Red Cross (Romain Bircher, Massimo Marelli, Katja Gysin) and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Cross Societies (Christopher Rassi) (Working Group). Several other representatives of these organizations also took part in the drafting, discussions, and meetings, making important contributions. The Working Group began discussions on this project in late 2013, and has had several working meetings in Mechelen (April 2014), Brussels (July 2014), Vienna (September 2014), Sofia (November 2014), and London (January 2015), in addition to multiple phone conferences and e-mail exchanges. The CoC was adopted within the Working Group by consensus, incorporating feedback received from many National Societies. The CoC was deemed necessary due to (1) the many actors of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (Movement) operating in the Family Links Network , and the need to transfer data within the Movement and to other actors, and (2) the changing regulatory environment in Europe and worldwide with regard to data protection laws and standards. The CoC sets out the minimum principles, commitments, and procedures that members of the Movement must comply with when processing data within the Family Links Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 Preparedness Profile(As of May 5
    Swiss Red Cross COVID-19 preparedness profile (as of May 5, 2020) Risk & Hazards Demography of mental health conditions, Psychiatric assessment, Psychological assessment, Psychological support INFORM COVID-19 Risk Index1 Population:7 8,516,543 provision in health facilities, Rehabilitation (substance abuse, physiotherapy etc.), Specialized psychological Population over 65:7 19% Hazard & Lack coping support, Training of community actors in basic Vulnerability Risk class psychological support, Training of health staff in basic Exposure capacity Income level:7 High income psychological support, Trauma treatment centres 3.7 4.3 0.0 Very Low 7 Urban (percentage): 74% 9 MHPSS target populations: INFORM COVID-19 risk rank: 189 of 191 countries Adolescents, Children, Families of missing persons, IFRC Operations (last 5 years) Migrants, People affected by violence, People affected Highlighted INFORM COVID-19 sub-components by war and armed conflict, People living with mental 11 DREF & Appeals health conditions, Survivors of sexual and gender-based Socio-Economic Vulnerability: 0.3 violence, Survivors of torture Epidemics Non-Epidemics Total Food Security: 1.3 Count 1 0 1 Other programming19, 20, 6, 21, 22, 23 Gender Based Violence (GBV): 1.8 CHF 5,709,720 0 5,709,720 People reached Movement (international & national): 2.4 All IFRC supported responses (last 5 yrs): - Program: Active: Direct: Indirect: Behaviour (awareness & trust)): 3.9 Epidemic/Pandemic: No - - Governance (effectiveness & corruption): 1.2 Swiss Red Cross Access to healthcare: 0.9 Mandate and resources13, 9, 6 CBS: No - - Health context NS Auxiliary role recognized: - Health (all program): No - - IDRL Law/Mechanism: - WASH: No - - Global Health Security Index:2 13 out of 195 Branches and warehouses: 80 DRR: Yes - - Global Health Security preparedness levels: Staff (% accidental insurance): 4,782 (100%) Social Inclusion: No - - Preventing pathogens: More prepared Volunteers (% a.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Sheltering Guidelines on Emergency Sheltering for ­Refugees in Germany German Red Cross & IFRC-Shelter Research Unit TABLE of CONTENTS
    Shelter Research Unit Innovating shelter Emergency Sheltering Guidelines on emergency sheltering for refugees in Germany GERMAN RED CROSS & IFRC-SHELTER RESEARCH UNIT TABLE OF CONTENTS A cknowledgements 2 Methodology of Information gathering 2 Shelter and Settlement terminology 3 Acronyms 4 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1. Objective 5 1.2. How to use this guide 5 2. BACKGROUND 6 2.1. Context (autumn 2015) 6 2.2. Germany´s asylum seekers procedures 7 2.3. Role of the German Red Cross 8 2.4. Country codes, regulations and procedures 8 2.5. Standards and Guidelines in the Humanitarian Shelter Sector 11 2.6. Settlement Typologies for Displaced Population 13 2.7. Cross-Cutting Humanitarian Aspects 15 2.8. Main difficulties encountered 16 2.9. Lessons learned and recommendations 18 3. SHELTER AND SETTLEMENT STANDARDS AND INDICATORS 20 3.1. Accomodation Typologies in Germany 20 3.2. Cross-Cutting Considerations 22 3.3. Standards and Indicators 24 3.3.1. Settlement Planning 24 3.3.2. Construction 30 3.3.3. Collective Spaces and Services 35 3.3.4. Sleeping Arrangements 43 3.3.5. Water 50 3.3.6. Sanitation 58 3.3.7. Solid Waste Management 66 3.3.8. Non Food Items (NFIs) 70 3.3.9. CHECKLIST 78 REFERENCES AND GENERAL RESOURCES 82 General References 82 Settlement and Shelter References 82 References for the German context 83 ANNEX 84 Imprint 86 Poster MINIMUM STANDARDS AND INDICATORS TABLE 1 GUI DELINES ON EMERGENCY SHELTERING FOR REFUGEES IN GERMANY AOECKN WL DGEMENTS T hese guidelines have been developed by IFRC-Shelter Research Unit com missioned by German Red Cross (GRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Movement Flood Response Fact Sheet No. 17
    Movement flood response Fact sheet no. 17 28 March 2011 The following factsheet provides an overview of the assistance provided to flood-affected people up to 17 March by the Pakistan Red Crescent Society (PRCS) with the support of its Red Cross Red Crescent Movement (Movement) partners. The information presented is based on the reports shared by all partners and is compiled to present the overall achievements according to each sector. Highlights As of 17 March: · 2,830,275 people have received food and non-food items through relief distributions. · 219,739 people have been reached with health services and psychosocial support. · 704,803 have benefited from water and sanitation services. · Winterized transitional shelter distribution in KPK, as part of early recovery, reaching 63,021 people. · The Movement continues early recovery interventions. 421,260 people received agricultural assistance material in KPK, Sindh and Balochistan. Relief · The Red Cross Red Crescent Movement has reached 2,454,550 people with food and 1,649,109 people with non-food items, reaching its initial targets. · In FATA and KPK, the Movement has completed relief distributions. Based on further needs transitioning into recovery, more food distribution is planned for Balochistan, KPK, Gilgit Baltistan, AJK, Punjab and Sindh, with 375,725 people already reached. The following graph gives an overview of people reached so far with food distributions: Shelter · 358,465 tarpaulins, 25,483 tents and 66,882 shelter kits have been distributed under the non- food items relief distribution. This will cater for emergency shelter needs of the flood-affected people. · The Movement’s winterized shelter distribution is nearly completed in KPK.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Appeal Final Report Syria: Floods
    Emergency Appeal Final Report Syria: Floods Emergency Appeal Operation n° MDRSY004 Date of issue: 08 April 2020 GLIDE n° FL-2019-000031-SYR Date of disaster: 31 March - 30 April 2019 Operation start date:12 April 2019 Operation end date:15 October 2019 Host National Society presence: Syrian Arab Red Operation budget: CHF 3,500,000 Crescent (SARC) Headquarters; Al-Hassakeh Branch (75 staff and 120 volunteers covering Al- DREF amount allocated: CHF 500,000 (12 April 2019) Hassakeh Governorate) Number of people affected: 235,000 Number of people assisted: Planned 45,000; actual 153,417 Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners involved in the operation: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC); International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), British Red Cross, Canadian Red Cross, Danish Red Cross, Finnish Red Cross, German Red Cross, Norwegian Red Cross and Swiss Red Cross. Other partner organizations involved in the operation: National government authorities, Al-Hassakeh Governorate and local authorities, and World Food Programme (WFP). The IFRC, on behalf of SARC, would like to thank the following for their generous contributions to this Appeal: Canadian Red Cross (from Canadian Government), Red Cross Society of China Hong Kong Branch, Finnish Red Cross, Japanese Red Cross, Netherlands Red Cross (from Netherlands Government) and Swedish Red Cross. In addition, SARC would like to thank the following for their bilateral contributions: British Red Cross, Danish Red Cross, German Red Cross and Swiss Red Cross. Summary This Emergency Appeal was launched on 15 April 2019, seeking CHF 3.5 million to enable IFRC to support Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC) to provide assistance to 45,000 people affected by floods in Al-Hassakeh Governorate in northeast Syria, over a six-month period, mid-April to mid-October 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent
    Volume 91 Number 876 December 2009 The International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent: challenges, key issues and achievements Franc¸ois Bugnion* Franc¸ois Bugnion, Doctor of Political Science, is an independent consultant in humanitarian law and humanitarian action. From January 2000 to June 2006 he was Director for International Law and Cooperation at the International Committee of the Red Cross. Abstract Since the constituent Conference in October 1863, which gave birth to the Red Cross,1 the International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent has met on thirty occasions. The first meeting took place in Paris in 1867 and the thirtieth in Geneva in November 2007. What contribution has the Conference made to the development of international humanitarian law and humanitarian action? What are the main challenges that the Conference has had to face? Where has it succeeded and where has it failed? These are the questions that this article seeks to answer. * This article is a personal contribution and does not necessarily reflect the views of the International Committee of the Red Cross. English translation by Mrs Glynis Thompson. doi:10.1017/S1816383110000147 675 F. Bugnion – The International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent: challenges, key issues and achievements The International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent: an unparalleled forum The composition of the Conference The matters submitted to the International Conference, the nature of its debates, and the bearing of its decisions are determined by its composition. Virtually unique among international bodies, the International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent brings together institutions born out of private initiative – the components of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement – and the States parties to the Geneva Conventions.2 This hybrid composition, which brings together institutions established as a result of private initiative and states, derives from the organization’s objectives.
    [Show full text]