DOCSLIB.ORG

Dealing with Data During an Emergency Catherine Burns Database & Supporter Care Manager New Zealand Red Cross

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dealing with Data During an Emergency Catherine Burns Database & Supporter Care Manager New Zealand Red Cross Dealing with Data During an Emergency Catherine Burns Database & Supporter Care Manager New Zealand Red Cross #bbcon2017 Social Goodness @NZRedCross @nzredcross Facebook.com/NewZealandRedCross linkedin.com/in/catherine-burns-b742a9a7 #bbcon2017 Random fact about me Most Saturday nights, and for 24 hours in most holiday weekends, you will find me playing strategy board games with my friends and Wellington On Board members. https://boardgamegeek.com/user/KiwiCat #bbcon2017 New Zealand Red Cross Fundraising environment #bbcon2017 Red Cross and Raiser’s Edge Date Status 2013 June Went live with Raiser’s Edge combining two databases into one. 2014 October Raiser’s Edge database moved from National Office server to a private Red Cross cloud. It could only be accessed from within the Red Cross network/firewall. 2016 January Started detailed business continuity planning across the organisation and identified lack of remote access to Raiser’s Edge as a critical issue. 2016 February One remote computer was set up in Hamilton with Raiser’s Edge installed so we could process monthly payments remotely if necessary. This required a double remote desktop connection to access from outside the Red Cross network. 2016 March Added move to Blackbaud hosting to budget and business plan for the 2016/17 FY. Not scheduled due to lack of buy in from Red Cross IT to provide data and any additional support required for the transition. 2016 November We had ten Raiser’s Edge users at National Office in Wellington plus four community fundraising staff and one planned giving officer located in other parts of the country with access to Raiser’s Edge. The remote staff were not trained in donation processing. 2017 – March We went live with Raiser’s Edge NXT ☺ (I will share lot’s of visual delighted from NXT in this preso) #bbcon2017 Special Appeals 100% Guarantee When a special appeal is launched • This is a great reason to donate to by New Zealand Red Cross we New Zealand Red Cross instead of guarantee that 100% of funds one of another charity. donated by the public will be • However, it limits the budget to spend used to help people affected. on promoting special appeals. • Special appeals actually increase None of the donated funds can be fundraising expenditure with no used for publicity of the appeal or increase in funds to spend. donation processing costs. • Special appeals are popular but we still need donors to support the rest of our work – national programmes, refugee resettlement etc. where the 100% guarantee does not apply. #bbcon2017 Special Appeals for acquisition Special appeals are one of our best acquisition tools if we can convert special appeal donors to support New Zealand Red Cross’ ongoing programmes. #bbcon2017 Earthquake 12:02 am Monday November 14 2016 Photo Credit: Simon Makker/New Zealand Red Cross #bbcon2017 November 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake • Magnitude 7.8 • 2 deaths • 57 people treated for injuries • 2 minutes long • 573+ homes damaged or • 15 km deep destroyed • 110 km stretch of seabed • Triggered a 7 m uplifted by up to 6m to form a tsunami new coastline • 8,500 aftershocks • Major infrastructure damage – in the first four weeks road and rail. • Many households and communities were cut off. #bbcon2017 In context – the shaky isles This was the second (equal) largest earthquake in NZ recorded history after 1855 Wairarapa earthquake at 8.2. Same size as the Hawkes Bay earthquake in February 1931 that led the New Zealand Red Cross becoming an independent society separate from the British Red Cross. Following the quakes in Christchurch in 2010 and 2011 New Zealand Red Cross raised NZ $120 million for recovery efforts and began a number of recovery programmes for the community. #bbcon2017 Following the quake – Monday 14th November • The first donation of $100 was made through our website at 1:27 am. • An official earthquake appeal was launched online at 1 pm despite staff working from home. • NZ $450,000 received online in the first week. NZ $800,000 received online in the first month. #bbcon2017 #bbcon2017 Photo Credit: /New Zealand Red Cross #bbcon2017 Photo Credit: Simon Makker/New Zealand Red Cross #bbcon2017 Following the quake – Tuesday 15th November • Red Cross National Office was checked and considered safe. • Worked from the office on Tuesday. • 4:45 pm received a panicked message from one of the tenants next door to evacuate because their building was “about to collapse.” • Did not return to National Office until the end of January 2017 after the building next door had been demolished. #bbcon2017 Immediate challenges for donation processing Challenge Achievement Launching and promoting the appeal while • The appeal was launched online 13 hours after the quake working from home. struck. Continuing to process 35,000 monthly • Tested remotely on 14/11. donations – 12,000 due on the 1st, 15th and 20th • Successfully processed from National Office on 15/11 before of each month. evacuation. Access to Raiser’s Edge, and phone system • Database & Supporter Care team set up at Wellington Service following the evacuation. Centre the day after evacuation. Raiser’s Edge installed x 4. • Phones were diverted. • 13 new Raiser’s Edge installations done in the week following evacuation. Processing cheque donations without the use of • NZ Post mail delivery was disrupted for two weeks. National Office resources –bank deposit books, • Urgent orders of new envelopes. branded, post-paid envelopes, folding machine. • Volunteers had to hand fold receipts. A direct mail appeal was about to be printed. This was stopped, and rewritten to focus on the work of the Red Cross Disaster Welfare Support Teams with minimal delays. #bbcon2017 #bbcon2017 Dealing with data #bbcon2017 Donation streams & useful tools and services • Online donations. • The Raiser’s Edge • Multiple fundraising platforms. • QAS Batch • Direct credits. • ImportOmatic • Post / direct mail response. • SegmentOmatic • Phone donations. • Campaign Monitor • Text to donate. • Cloud based phone system • Kiwibank / NZ Post donations. • Office 365 email and intranet • Red Cross Service Centres and • Existing relationships with Charity Shops. telemarketing agencies • Community Fundraising. • Existing corporate relationships • Pledges and donations from • Paperless direct debit facility corporates and trusts. #bbcon2017 How we managed these sources • Processes had already been set up to clean and import data from these income steams • Excel and QAS Batch to clean data and addresses prior to import. • ImportOmatic to import data and minimize duplicates. • Staff and volunteers backfilled supporter care tasks to free up time to process increased volumes of donations. • A temp was employed for a few weeks to assist with supporter care enquiries and appeal donation processing. #bbcon2017 Using the data – appeal updates • Everyone wanted to know the latest appeal total • A shared Excel document was used to compile appeal updates from all the streams to estimate the appeal total even before all the data had been imported into Raiser’s Edge or been entered into the General Ledger. • We also used it to track major pledges from Corporates. • This was • Shared within the team • Used for press releases, fact sheets etc. • Emailed to other managers • Used to update a Fundometer on the wall to encourage and update all staff. #bbcon2017 #bbcon2017 Results #bbcon2017 Figures correct as of 12 December 2016 #bbcon2017 Special Appeal success #bbcon2017 Special Appeal Acquisition #bbcon2017 Special Appeal success #bbcon2017 Special Appeal by constituency #bbcon2017 Comparison with other special appeals #bbcon2017 Successful Direct Mail appeal for general funds #bbcon2017 Successful Direct Mail appeal for general funds November 2016 Direct Mail Appeal January 2017 Direct Mail Appeal #bbcon2017 Going further with data #bbcon2017 Telemarketing Conversion Campaign 1,730 names were supplied. These were segmented in Raiser’s Edge: • New donors - first ever gift to Red Cross to the Earthquake appeal. • Reactivated donors - did not receive the direct mail appeal and donated to the Earthquake appeal. Donors were told about the other work of Red Cross and asked to set up a monthly gift to support the ongoing work of Red Cross. Calling started two weeks after the disaster on 28 November and continued until the end of January. • 1,166 were reached. • 62 set up regular gifts. • 4 others made a further one off gift. #bbcon2017 Telemarketing Conversion Recurring % Number Monthly Monthly Segment Cash Gifts Gift Sum to Conversion Contacted Gifts Amount 31 July Rate New 940 $125 53 $955 $6,120 5.6% Reactivated 226 $30 9 $185 $1,205 4.0% Totals 1,166 $155 62 $1,140 $7,325 5.3% 8 months later 95% of the converted donors are still giving monthly. #bbcon2017 Direct Mail Conversion / Reactivation This was sent to 6,294 donors Segmented with SegmentOmatic in Raiser’s Edge • New donors (174) first ever gift to the Red Cross Earthquake appeal. • Reactivated donors (18) donated to the Earthquake appeal and had donated before but did not receive the standard direct mail appeal. • Lapsed special appeal donors (5,699) did not donate to the Earthquake Appeal but had donated to a special appeal in the last 13-24 months. Did not receive the standard direct mail appeal. • Long lapsed High Value (26) Christchurch donors who gave $5000+ to that appeal but had not donated in the last four years • Long lapsed donors (377) did not donate to the Earthquake Appeal and had not donated in the last four years but donated to a special appeal in the past. #bbcon2017 Direct Mail Conversion / Reactivation The direct mail went to 6,294 donors and was a slightly updated version of the direct mail piece that went to 19,000 active donors in November. The letter focused on the work of the Disaster Welfare Support Teams and donors were asked to make a donation to support the work of Red Cross. There was also an option on the response form to set up a regular gift.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Resilience, Capitals, and Power Relations
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Community Resilience, Capitals, and Power relations: Stories from the Waimakariri District about the aftermath of the 2010-2011Canterbury Earthquakes in New Zealand. A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Resource and Environmental Planning at Massey University, Manawatu, New Zealand. Martín García Cartagena 2019 ABSTRACT Situated on the southern Pacific Rim, New Zealand’s seismic profile has long posed risks for New Zealand communities. In this geological context, fostering community resilience to natural hazards is vital and resilience is beginning to be mainstreamed into New Zealand’s planning and emergency management systems. However, a challenge emerges: how can the complex and contested concept of community resilience be operationalised in practice? This thesis addresses this question by critically evaluating how community resources and assets can be framed as community capitals, and exploring how these were mobilised in the Waimakariri District; an area affected by the 2010/11 Canterbury earthquake sequence. A novel conceptual framework, the Community Resilience Capitals Framework, is developed on the basis of a literature review on resilience and capitals integrating Social-Ecological Systems theory, community resilience theory, and multi-capital frameworks. The research was underpinned by social constructionism, framed by a critical inquiry perspective and conducted using a Community-Based Participatory design. A mixed-methods approach was applied to explore the breadth and depth of Waimakariri post-Canterbury earthquake recovery stories.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Matters Recovery Matters WORKPLACE WORKSHOP WORKPLACE WORKSHOP
    recovery matters recovery matters WORKPLACE WORKSHOP WORKPLACE WORKSHOP WORKPLACE www.redcross.org.nz 0800 RED CROSS facebook.com/NewZealandRedCross Psychosocial Support @NZRedCross Acknowledgements Red Cross kindly thanks all those involved in the planning, development and review of this resource. Special thank you to Australian Red Cross for sharing their knowledge, materials and guidance. New Zealand Red Cross acknowledges the contributions and materials provided by the following: The International Federation of Red Cross Red Crescent Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support; All Right?; Anne Leadbeater (Office of the Emergency Services Commissioner, Victoria); Jemima Richards and Kate Riddell (Firefoxes); The Hull Flood Project, UK; Guy Fredricks; Frank Film; Paua Productions; Australian Broadcasting Agency; The Guardian; Tom Scott. Thank you to the following people and organisations for sharing their knowledge and reviewing the content of this resource: Dr Rob Gordon; Dr Sarb Johal (Joint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University); Dr Caroline Bell (Mental Health Clinical Research, University of Otago); Maureen Mooney (Joint Centre for Disaster Research, Massey University); Mike Moss (St John of God Waipuna); Graham Allan (Mental Health and Addiction Services, Canterbury District Health Board); Ciaran Fox (Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand); Kerri Bonner (Youthline); Shirley Wright (Christchurch Resettlement Services); Cameron Scott (Disability Services, Christchurch City Council); Trisha Ventom (IHC); Kate van Heugten (Department of Human Services and Social Work, University of Canterbury); Yvonne Gray (New Zealand Red Cross). Jolie Wills and Holly Griffin are the principal creators of the Recovery Matters psychosocial training resources. Holly Griffin is the principal author of this workbook. New Zealand Red Cross material The material contained in this resource is the intellectual property of New Zealand Red Cross.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaky Isles Economic Impact of the Canterbury Earthquake
    6 September 2010 Shaky isles Economic impact of the Canterbury earthquake damage to at least one dairy manufacturing plant, although it • The earthquake that struck the Canterbury region is expected to return to normal operation within days. There is this weekend has resulted in extensive damage to sure to be as-yet unreported damage to productive capacity infrastructure and property, with early estimates elsewhere. putting the total damage at around $2bn, or 1% of national GDP. A survey of the 1994 Los Angeles earthquake – which was of • Reconstruction efforts are likely to be a net positive comparable magnitude to the Canterbury quake – found that for measured GDP – but the national balance sheet 57% of businesses suffered some degree of physical damage; has undoubtedly been weakened by this event. about 22% of premises suffered structural damage, although • The local nature of the event, and a high level of ultimately only 2% were condemned. 1 The median loss was preparedness for it, should limit the implications for about NZ$12,000 in current price terms, reflecting the fact financial markets. that most firms were small (though there were a few very large losses; the largest in the survey was $35m). The 7.1 magnitude earthquake that struck Canterbury in the early hours of Saturday morning resulted in no loss of life, but More than half had to close temporarily, even if only for a few has wrought extensive damage to infrastructure and property. days. The most common reason given was employees unable to Media reports have varied from 5% of buildings sustaining get to work (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Ambassador Report – January 2006
    Article from: International Section News July 2006 – Issue No. 39 New Zealand’s Ambassador Report – January 2006 by Richard Geisler ew Zealand sits astride the earthquakes go, 2005 was an average year Australian and Pacific tectonic with two quakes bigger than 6.0 and 24 N plates, which produced our spectacu- between 5.0 and 5.9. lar mountain ranges. As the plates continue to There have been some disastrous quakes in grind together we can offer visitors a walk New Zealand’s short history. The most tragic through fascinating areas of visible geothermal was the Hawkes Bay quake in 1931 that activity (geysers and bubbling mud) as well as levelled the town of Napier causing 256 deaths the occasional rumble when you least expect it. and 500 injuries. Napier was rebuilt in the As this is an actuarial report, I’ll discuss a bit styles of the 1930s and is now a beautiful stop about how this risk is mitigated for New on any tour as the art deco capital of the world. Zealanders, and then see if I can entice you to Add volcanoes and tsunamis to the earth- visit the “Shaky Isles.” quake risk, and occasionally there are some front-page stories of particular interest to insurers. Due to the risk of extensive property loss from natural disaster, the New Zealand government created the Earthquake Commission. The EQC (http://www.eqc. govt.nz/) provides insurance to residential property owners to cover damage caused by earthquake, natural landslip, volcanic erup- tion, hydrothermal activity and tsunami. New Zealand is known as the “Shaky Isles.” Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Post-Disaster Recovery Capitals (Recap)
    Guide to Post-Disaster Recovery Capitals (ReCap) Pilot | Australian edition Acknowledgements: The ReCap project has drawn upon relevant data and findings from the Beyond Bushfires study and related research conducted by the University of Melbourne, Australia; on Resilient Wellington and related research conducted by Massey University, New Zealand; and other relevant disaster recovery research. The authors gratefully acknowledge the specific contributions of Professor Daniel Aldrich (Northeastern University, USA), Dr Melissa Parsons (University of New England, Australia), Professor Mehmet Ulubasoglu and Farah Beaini (Deakin University, Australia) and the conceptual contributions of all academic, end- user and other stakeholder partners including Australian Red Cross, Leadbeater Group, Victoria State Emergency Service, Country Fire Authority, University of Melbourne Department of Social Work, Wellington Region Emergency Management Office, New Zealand Red Cross, Fire and Emergency New Zealand, Phoenix Australia, Social Recovery Reference Group, Australian Department of Home Affairs, Department of Primary Industries and Regions South Australia, Emergency Management Victoria, Resilient Melbourne, Creative Recovery Network and Regional Arts Victoria. Funding: This study is funded by the Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre. Suggested citation: Quinn P, Gibbs L, Blake D, Campbell E, Johnston D, Ireton G. Guide to Post-Disaster Recovery Capitals (ReCap). Melbourne, Australia: Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre; July 2020. Retrieved from <www.redcross.org.au/recap> Contact: Please direct any enquiries or comments regarding this pilot resource to Phoebe Quinn: (03) 8344 3097, [email protected] or [email protected]. Further project information: Australian ReCap resources are hosted on the Australian Red Cross website: www.redcross.org.au/recap.
    [Show full text]
  • Charity in Uniform
    New Zealand Journal of History, 50, 2 (2016) Charity in Uniform THE VOLUNTARY AID DETACHMENTS OF THE NEW ZEALAND RED CROSS ‘I HAVE WORN A UNIFORM ALL MY LIFE’, said Rachel Simpson, director of the New Zealand Red Cross Voluntary Aid Detachments (VADs) in 1968. After wearing a school uniform she had dressed in uniforms representing various levels of the professional nursing hierarchy and, finally, as matron to the Royal New Zealand Air Force, nursing’s overlap with the military.1 Simpson was to die in office in 1972 as director of the uniformed branch of a voluntary organization, but not before overseeing the introduction of a new Red Cross uniform. Such was the resistance to change that a frustrated Simpson declared herself ‘fed up with the uniform’: ‘We should be bringing forward new and better ideas which show we are a bit more alive and not concerned only with what we look like …. I think it is high time we set our sights a little higher than we are at the moment’.2 Simpson may have spent a lifetime conforming to uniform codes, but her volunteers were proving less compliant. A generational divide between those loyal to a past uniform and all that it denoted and those who rejected uniforms altogether was played out within the Red Cross. The uniform change in the late 1960s preceded a wider transformation of New Zealand Red Cross structures, but also symbolized the diminishing presence of uniforms within New Zealand society more generally. The range of regulated clothing falls within a spectrum of highly prescriptive, required conformity,
    [Show full text]
  • Donor Response Refreshed on 02-Oct-2021 at 08:16
    Page 1 of 2 Selected Parameters Appeal Code MDRBD018 Year / Range 1900-2100 Donor response Refreshed on 02-Oct-2021 at 08:16 MDRBD018 - Bangladesh - Population Movement FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: 82,200,000 APPEAL LAUNCH DATE: 18-Mar-2017 RECEIVED TO DATE: 66,027,591 APPEAL COVERAGE TO DATE: 80% TIMEFRAME: 13-Jan-2017 to 31-Dec-2021 LOCATION: Bangladesh Bilateral Cash Inkind Goods Inkind Other Income Contributions Total contributions & Transport Personnel * CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF FUNDING REQUIREMENTS 82,200,000 FUNDING Opening Balance Income American Red Cross 179,521 73,250 13,940 266,711 Australian Red Cross 826,382 361,650 1,188,032 Australian Red Cross (from Australian Government*) 1,194,930 1,194,930 Australian Red Cross (from Swedish Red Cross*) 24,644 24,644 Austrian Red Cross (from Austrian Government*) 399,617 399,617 Bahrain Red Crescent Society 88,672 88,672 Belgian Red Cross (Flanders) 51,780 51,780 Belgian Red Cross (Francophone) 51,780 51,780 British Red Cross 2,443,596 288,785 154,847 644,234 3,531,463 British Red Cross (from British Government*) 2,565,312 890 2,566,202 British Red Cross (from DEC (Disasters Emergency 269,459 269,459 Committee)*) China Red Cross, Hong Kong branch 169,712 131,521 301,232 China Red Cross, Macau Branch 250 250 Danish Red Cross 82,000 82,000 Danish Red Cross (from Danish Government*) 147,500 147,500 European Commission - DG ECHO 165,896 165,896 Finnish Red Cross 1,486,573 1,486,573 Finnish Red Cross (from Finnish Government*) 120,678 120,678 German Red Cross 23,908 23,908 IFRC at the UN Inc 977
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Our Volunteers
    1 The value of our volunteers A Volunteering Study Focusing on the Participants, Facilitators and Community of the 2015 Youth Emergency Preparedness Programme (YEPP) Dunedin, New Zealand New Zealand Red Cross Society by Hannah Cruickshank Sarita Aldred National Youth Panel National Youth Panel New Zealand Red Cross New Zealand Red Cross Strategy 2020 voices the collective determination of the IFRC to move forward in tackling the major challenges that confront humanity in the next decade. Informed by the needs and vulnerabilities of the diverse communities with whom we work, as well as the basic rights and freedoms to which all are entitled, this strategy seeks to benefit all who look to Red Cross Red Crescent to help to build a more humane, dignified, and peaceful world. Over the next ten years, the collective focus of the IFRC will be on achieving the following strategic aims: 1. Save lives, protect livelihoods, and strengthen recovery from disasters and crises 2. Enable healthy and safe living 3. Promote social inclusion and a culture of non-violence and peace © International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Asia Pacific Regional office Asia Pacific Region, Kuala Lumpur, 2017 The Ampwalk, Suite 10.02 (North Block) Any part of this publication may be cited, copied, 218 Jalan Ampang translated into other languages or adapted to meet local 50450, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia needs without prior permission from the International Tel: +60 3 9207 5700 Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Fax: +60 3 2161 0670 provided that the source is clearly stated. Requests for E-mail: [email protected] commercial reproduction should be directed to the IFRC at [email protected] P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW ZEALAND Queenstown South Island Town Or SOUTH Paparoa Village Dunedin PACIFIC Invercargill OCEAN
    6TH Ed TRAVEL GUIDE LEGEND North Island Area Maps AUCKLAND Motorway Tasman Sea Hamilton Rotorua National Road New Plymouth Main Road Napier NEW Palmerston North Other Road ZEALAND Nelson WELLINGTON 35 Route 2 Number Greymouth AUCKLAND City CHRISTCHURCH NEW ZEALAND Queenstown South Island Town or SOUTH Paparoa Village Dunedin PACIFIC Invercargill OCEAN Airport GUIDE TRAVEL Lake Taupo Main Dam or (Taupomoana) Waterway CONTENTS River Practical, informative and user-friendly, the Tongariro National 1. Introducing New Zealand National Park Globetrotter Travel Guide to New Zealand The Land • History in Brief Park Government and Economy • The People akara highlights the major places of interest, describing their Forest 2. Auckland, Northland ort Park principal attractions and offering sound suggestions and the Coromandel Mt Tongariro Peak on where to tour, stay, eat, shop and relax. Auckland City Sightseeing 1967 m Around Auckland • Northland ‘Lord of the The Coromandel Rings’ Film Site THE AUTHORS Town Plans 3. The Central North Island Motorway and Graeme Lay is a full-time writer whose recent books include Hamilton and the Waikato Slip Road Tauranga, Mount Maunganui and The Miss Tutti Frutti Contest, Inside the Cannibal Pot and the Bay of Plenty Coastline Wellington Main Road Rotorua • Taupo In Search of Paradise - Artists and Writers in the Colonial Tongariro National Park Seccombes Other Road South Pacific. He has been the Montana New Zealand Book The Whanganui River • The East Coast and Poverty Bay • Taranaki Pedestrian Awards Reviewer of the Year, and has three times been a CITY MALL 4. The Lower North Island Zone finalist in the Cathay Pacific Travel Writer of the Year Awards.
    [Show full text]
  • REDCROSS + R[PEKA WHERO AOTEAROA New Zealand Red Cross Policies
    NEW ZEALAND REDCROSS + R[PEKA WHERO AOTEAROA New Zealand Red Cross Policies The following are policies of New Zealand Red Cross and may be of interest to Members. They are combined into one document in this PDF, but can be accessed individually on request. FN03 Handling Cash and Donations at Branches Page 2-4 FNOS Delegated Financial Authorities Policy Page 5-18 FN06 Fraud, Corruption & Dishonesty Policy Page 19-27 FN08 Procurement Policy Page 28-46 PC07 Code of Conduct Page 47-50 PC01 Health Safety & Wellbeing Management System Framework Page 51-69 PC04 Background Check Policy Page 70-71 PC15 Problem Resolution, Bullying & Harassment Policy Page 72-87 PC22 Motor Vehicle Policy Page 88-99 Driving for New Zealand Red Cross Standards Page 100-104 PC24 Privacy Policy Page 105-113 FC0l Media Communications Policy Page 114-121 FC03 Social Media Policy Page 122-132 FC04 Ethical Fundraising Policy Page 133-139 FCOS Community Partnerships Policy Page 140-148 FC06 Special Appeals Policy Page 149-153 G0l Members' Handbook Separate File G02 Board Charter Page 154-161 G03 People & Remuneration Committee Terms of Reference Page 162-163 G04 International Committee Terms of Reference Page 164 GOS Audit & Risk Committee Terms of Reference Page 165-166 G06 Honours & Awards Committee Terms of Reference Page 167 GO7 National Youth Panel Terms of Reference Page 168-171 G09 Migration Committee Terms of Reference Page 172-173 GlO Maori Advisory Group Memorandum of Understanding To be approved Gll Pasifika Advisory Group Terms of Reference To be approved HD01 Child Protection Policy Page 174-196 ORO! Business Continuity Plan To be approved OR02 Emblem Policy Page 197-212 OR03 Advocacy Policy Page 213-223 OR04 Youth Participation Policy Page 224-235 DR01 Event First Aid & Standard Operating Procedures Page 236-252 For a full list of policies, please refer to the New Zealand Red Cross Members' Handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • MDRSY003 Year / Range 1900-2100 Donor Response Refreshed on 27-Sep-2021 at 08:21
    Page 1 of 6 Selected Parameters Appeal Code MDRSY003 Year / Range 1900-2100 Donor response Refreshed on 27-Sep-2021 at 08:21 MDRSY003 - Syria - Syria Complex Emergency FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: 208,882,000 APPEAL LAUNCH DATE: 06-Jul-2012 RECEIVED TO DATE: 188,093,194 APPEAL COVERAGE TO DATE: 90% TIMEFRAME: 06-Jul-2012 to 31-Dec-2021 LOCATION: Syria Bilateral Cash Inkind Goods Inkind Other Income Contributions Total contributions & Transport Personnel * CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF CHF FUNDING REQUIREMENTS 208,882,000 FUNDING Opening Balance Income Airbus 37,652 -1,857 35,795 Amazon 89 89 American Red Cross 1,080,570 168,056 1,248,626 Andorran Red Cross 7,576 7,576 Australian Red Cross 1,509,968 1,509,968 Austrian Red Cross 30,290 30,290 Austrian Red Cross (from Austrian Government*) 3,318,354 3,318,354 Austria - Private Donors 975 975 Belgian Red Cross (Flanders) 69,384 158,249 227,633 Belgian Red Cross (Francophone) (from Belgian Federal 358,399 358,399 Government*) Belgium - Private Donors 283 283 BG Group 570 570 British Red Cross 11,095,033 10,451,898 23,017 21,569,948 British Red Cross (from British Government*) 3,504,290 3,504,290 British Red Cross (from DEC (Disasters Emergency 1,702,866 1,702,866 Committee)*) British Red Cross (from Great Britain - Private Donors*) 4,140 4,140 British Red Cross (from Unidentified donor*) 27,207 27,207 China Red Cross, Hong Kong branch 70,943 71,841 142,785 Danish Red Cross 2,364,559 146,392 504,566 3,015,517 Danish Red Cross (from Danish Government*) 112,000 112,000 Danish Red Cross (from European Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Operations Update Mozambique: Tropical Cyclone Idai & Kenneth
    Operations Update Mozambique: Tropical Cyclone Idai & Kenneth Emergency Appeal n° MDRMZ014 GLIDE n° TC-2019-000021-MOZ Operations Update n° 6, Timeframe covered by this update: Date of Issue: 12 Nov 2020 01 April 2020 to 30 September 2020 Operation start date: 19 March 2019 Operation timeframe: 28 Months until 19 July 2021 Current Emergency Appeal Budget: 32,000,000 CHF Appeal Coverage: 84% Initial DREF Allocated: 750,000 CHF (CHF 26,783,646 raised; CHF 5,216,354 funding gap) Project Manager Contact: National Society contact: Letizia Vero – Operation Manager Mozambique Maria Cristina Uamusse, Secretary-General, [email protected] Mozambique Red Cross (CVM), [email protected] Total Number of people reached: 515,636 people Host National Society presence: Mozambique Red Cross (Cruz Vermelha de Mozambique, CVM) was established in 1981, and officially recognized by the Government of Mozambique in 1988. It became a member of the IFRC in 1989. CVM has a presence in all of the country’s 11 provinces and 133 districts (out of 154). It has approximately 220 staff, 5,500 active volunteers and 70,000 members across the country. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners involved in the operation (since the beginning of the operation): National Red Cross Societies from Spain, Belgium-Flanders, Germany, Italy and Portugal, as well as International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) are present in the country and are actively supporting CVM. Many more partner
    [Show full text]