Physical Geography of Ontario

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Physical Geography of Ontario C h a p t e r 2 : Physical Geography of Ontario David J. B. Baldwin1, Joseph R. Desloges2, and Lawrence E. Band3 Introduction Table 2.1 Ontario, the second largest province of Canada, covers English as a Second Language (ESL) enrolment by approximately 1 million km2 and extends approximately School District, 1993-94. from 42°N to 57°N latitude and from 75°W to 95°W longitude. The major patterns of geoclimatic features ESL as Percent across the province are strongly interrelated and form of Total District School District ESL Enrolment Enrolment the foundation for the biotic and natural disturbance processes of Ontario’s many different landscapes. In this Vancouver 25,960 48% chapter, we describe the spatial distribution of the abi- Richmond 8,686 39% otic factors, including bedrock, surficial geology, climate, Surrey 5,775 12% soils and hydrology, that influence and interact with Burnaby 3,599 17% the biotic systems. The relationships among these ele- Coquitlam 2,571 9% North Vancouver 1,892 11% ments, and the various biotic and natural disturbance Abbotsford 1,073 6% processes at work across the province, are the subject Victoria 1,043 4% of subsequent chapters in Sections I and II of this book. In keeping with the focus of this book on Ontario’s Source: BCTF (1994). northern managed forest landscape, we do not describe the southern, settled portion of the province, but refer cent of the province is underlain by Precambrian rock the reader to well-known summaries of that region, such of the Canadian Shield (Thurston 1991). In the Phan- as Chapman and Putnam (1984). erozoic age, sedimentary rocks developed in marine basins along the northern border of the Shield, form- Geology and Terrain ing the Hudson Bay lowlands, and in the Great Lakes The geology and terrain of Ontario are best understood Basins in the south (Figure 2.1). The Shield can be di- by first examining the foundation of bedrock geology vided into three major geological and physiographic underlying the surficial deposits and landforms. Table regions, from the oldest in the northwest to the young- 2.1 provides a summary of the geologic time scale rel- est in the southeast. The northwestern region, known evant to Ontario’s bedrock and surficial geology. as the Superior Province, is more than 2.5 billion years The bedrock geology of Ontario is variable in lithol- old. This region, which can be described as lying north ogy, structure and age, although approximately 61 per- and west of the present city of Sudbury, is composed 1 Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ontario Ministry of Natural 3 Department of Geography, University of North Carolina, CB# Resources, 1235 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario 3220 Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 27599 P6A 2E5 2 Department of Geography, University of Toronto, 100 George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3 2 Physical Geography of Ontario Table 2.1 Geologic periods relevant to Ontario’s bedrock and surficial geology. (Adapted from Trenhaile 1998 and Webber and Hoffman 1970) Physical Geography of Ontario 3 mainly of felsic intrusive rocks forming the rocky Sev- across most of Ontario have low total relief and de- ern and Abitibi uplands (Bostock 1970). The central ranged drainage patterns from glaciation, both of which region, known as the Grenville Province, is 1.0 to 1.6 result in poor drainage. billion years old. This region lies to the south of Sudbury, All of Ontario underwent a set of major glacial ad- and is dominated by metasedimentary rocks that form vances and retreats during the last major glacial stade, the Laurentian highlands. The Penokean hills, a fold up to 12,000 years BP. Northern parts of the province belt, and the Cobalt plain, an embayment, constitute were still covered with ice 8000 years BP (Hardy 1977, the Southern Province, which is a narrow region ap- Ritchie 1989). The Hudson Ice, a distinct domain within proximately 1.8 to 2.4 billion years old extending from the Laurentide Ice Sheet, had a number of separate Sault Ste. Marie in the west approximately to Kirkland lobes, one extending northeastward up the St. Lawrence Lake in the east. River, a second westward into Lake Huron, and a third To the north of the Shield, in the area generally re- east-to-northeastward out of Lake Superior (Dyke et ferred to as the Hudson Bay lowlands, the bedrock is com- al. 1989). The retreat of the ice was neither uniform posed of carbonate sedimentary formations. These nor continuous. Isolated re-advances, such as the formations date primarily from the Silurian period, but Cochrane surge, occurred during the period of final there are significant areas from the Ordovician and deglaciation. Figure 2.3 provides an overview of the Devonian periods as well. Other sedimentary rocks occur major features and surficial materials across the prov- near the city of Ottawa, in an area referred to as the ince. During the retreat, streams formed along the mar- Ottawa embayment, as well as throughout areas north gins of the ice sheets and created oblique, linear patterns of Lakes Erie and Ontario (Dyke et al. 1989). The clas- of deposition. Glaciofluvial complexes that occur in vari- tic and marine carbonate bedrock of southern Ontario ous parts of the province (for example, the Oak Ridges is interrupted by the Frontenac Axis, a southern exten- complex in southern Ontario, and the Burntwood-Knife sion of the Shield, which intersects the St. Lawrence and Harricana-Lake McConnell complexes in central Seaway east of Kingston. The Frontenac Axis has dif- Ontario, each extending hundreds of kilometres, pro- ferent forest cover and land use patterns than areas to vide evidence of the massive scale of the convergent either the west or east, owing to its uneven terrain and ice lobes and catastrophic meltwater discharges shallow, acidic soils, both characteristic of the Cana- (Brennand and Shaw 1994) beneath the ice sheets and dian Shield. at their forward margins. The topography of Ontario varies from flat plains to The retreating ice sheet fed a series of large meltwa- low, rolling uplands having 60 m to 90 m of relative ter lakes. Glacial Lake Algonquin covered much of the relief, to dissected uplands with ridges, escarpments and area from Sudbury to Huntsville. The Champlain Sea cuestas as high as 200 m above the adjacent terrain. flooded well above the current levels of the Ottawa This variation in topography originates from the bed- River Valley and of Lake Ontario. Lake Barlow-Ojibway rock structure; from extensive pre-Quaternary erosion, covered a large area south of James Bay over what is which is estimated at more than 6000 m since the last now referred to as the Claybelt. The Tyrrell Sea lay mountain-building episode (Card et al. 1972); and from over the Hudson Bay lowlands. In the northwest, Lake Quaternary glaciations that both eroded and filled the Agassiz covered virtually one-third of the province, pre-Quaternary surface. The significant relief that is joining with the Tyrrell Sea to the east for a short pe- present elsewhere in eastern North America is absent riod (Teller 1985). Neither the postglacial lakes nor from Ontario. The highest point in the province, Maple the Tyrrell Sea had fully receded until about 6000 BP. Mountain near Temagami, is 693 m. The most rugged The general northward retreat of the Laurentide Ice and fragmented surfaces occur in a band extending from Sheet left a predominately sandy to silty till cover over the north shore of Lake Superior, across the Algoma the southern part of the Shield and over southern On- highlands, through the Sudbury region and north of tario, in contrast to the silty and clayey till and clay- Manitoulin Island, and across the Madawaska highlands. rich lake and marine deposits that dominate the This height of land forms a continental divide between northern half of the province (Dredge and Cowan the Great Lakes and Arctic drainage of Hudson Bay; 1989). Low-lying and poorly-drained glacial deposits north of this line, the elevation falls off monotonically have become covered with peat and other organic de- (Figure 2.2). The large river basins that flow to the north posits (Figure 2.3). 4 Physical Geography of Ontario Figure 2.2 Topography of Ontario, generated from a 1-km digital elevation model. (Data from Mackey et al. 1994) Physical Geography of Ontario 5 Figure 2.3 Surficial geology of Ontario. (Adapted from Forest Landscape Ecology Program 1996) 6 Physical Geography of Ontario Figure 2.4 Temperature characteristics of Ontario: (a) annual mean daily temperature; (b) mean daily minimum temperature for January; (c) mean daily maximum temperature for July; and (d) growing-degree-days over 5oC. Temperatures interpolated from 30 years of data from more than 400 AES stations. (Adapted from Watson and MacIver 1995) Physical Geography of Ontario 7 Together, glaciation and postglacial deposition largely areas as far south as Kirkland Lake. The result is a sub- account for the present landscape of the province. The stantial reduction in growing-degree-days, relative to ice sheets sculpted or rounded the land and generally other locations in Canada at similar latitudes. For ex- reduced its elevation, removed the original topsoils, and ample, Winnipeg, Manitoba lies at approximately the exposed the bedrock. Deposits laid down by glacial same latitude as Cochrane, Ontario, but has about 1000 streams and lakes have strongly influenced soil devel- more growing-degree-days. Lake Superior and the Lake opment and, consequently, the composition of present- Huron moderate the winter temperature, “bending” the day forests (Thompson 2000, this volume). isolines around their shores (Figure 2.4b).
Recommended publications
  • Maternal-Newborn Gap Analysis a Review of Low Volume, Rural, and Remote Intrapartum Services in Ontario
    The Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health Maternal-Newborn Gap Analysis A review of low volume, rural, and remote intrapartum services in Ontario. August, 2018 Project Team Vicki Van Wagner, RM, PhD Associate Professor, Ryerson University Jane Wilkinson, BSc., MD, FRCSC, CSPE Obstetrician-Gynecologist Doreen Day, MHSc Senior Program Manager, Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health Laura Zahreddine, RN, BScN, MN Program Coordinator, Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health Sherry Chen, MBBS, MHI Decision Support Specialist, Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health The project team would like to thank the interview participants as well as the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences for supporting the data needs of this work. © 2018 Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health Materials contained within this publication are copyright by the Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health. Publications are intended for dissemination within and use by clinical networks. Reproduction or use of these materials for any other purpose requires the express written consent of the Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health. Anyone seeking consent to reproduce materials in whole or in part, must seek permission of the Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health by contacting [email protected]. Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health 555 University Avenue Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8 [email protected] Maternal Newborn Gap Analysis | 2 Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Henslow's Sparrows: an Up-Date by Madeline J.W
    59 Henslow's Sparrows: An Up-Date by Madeline J.W. Austen Introduction Knapton 119821 reported that only In Canada, Henslow's Sparrow 17 individuals in seven widely (Ammodramus henslowiil has been scattered areas across southern known to breed in Ontario and in Ontario were detected during the southwestern Quebec. In recent 1981 breeding season. In 1983, the years, Henslow's Sparrow has been known Ontario population of known to breed only in Ontario, with Henslow's Sparrows was 25 to 29 the majority of nesting sites in the individuals at 13 sites (Ontario mid-1980s being located in the Breeding Bird Atlas; Risley 19831. southern part of Hastings, Lennox­ During the Atlas of the Breeding Addington, and Frontenac Counties, Birds of Ontario, the Henslow's and in Prince Edward County. It also Sparrow was found in only 38 has occurred in Grey, Bruce, and squares, and in only 8% of these was Dufferin Counties. Figure 1 shows breeding confirmed (Cadman et al. the breeding distribution of 19871. At this time, it was unlikely Henslow's Sparrow in Ontario, based that the total provincial population on data from the Breeding Bird Atlas exceeded 50 pairs in any given year and the Ontario Rare Breeding Bird (Knapton 1987). The ORBBP received Program (ORBBPI. information on only 23 Henslow's This article provides an up-date Sparrow sites, seven of which were on the status of Henslow's Sparrow active during the 1986 to 1991 period. and summarizes the results of survey However, breeding site information efforts since Knapton (19861. from the Kingston area was not reported to the ORBBP.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Better Future
    BUILDING A BETTER FUTURE FINANCIAL LITERACY WORK READINESS ENTREPRENEURSHIP Annual Report 2015-2016 JA Central Ontario A Member of JA Canada About JA JA Worldwide is one of the largest global NGOs dedicated to addressing fundamental social and economic challenges of young people by educating and empowering them to transform their future and own their economic success. With more than 100 member countries, the JA Worldwide network is powered by over 450,000 volunteers and mentors, reaching more than 10 million young people around the world every year. From Barrie to Burlington to Bowmanville, JA Central Ontario delivers cutting-edge, experiential learning in financial literacy, work readiness, and entrepreneurship. We broaden the canvas of possibility for young people across Central Ontario and enrich their ability to engage in their own economic development and contribute to the strength of their families, communities, and local economies. IN FISCAL 2016, JA CENTRAL ONTARIO WAS PROUD TO: INSPIRE CONNECT WITH REACH DELIVER 51,224 3,366 563 2,005 STUDENTS VOLUNTEERS SCHOOLS PROGRAMS AND AND 69 99 CORPORATE NEW PARTNERS SCHOOLS What’s Inside? Leadership Message 1 Award Winning Volunteers 2 Financial Literacy 3 Work Readiness 4 Entrepreneurship 5 Company Program 6 Program Events 7 Corporate Donors 8 Individual Donors 12 Bold Thinkers 13 Governors’ Dinner 14 Golf Classic 15 Auditor’s Report 16 Financial Statements 17 Board of Directors 18 Board of Governors 19 Leadership Message It’s tough to be a student these days. While it is true that they don’t have to walk miles in the snow, they do face higher unemployment and under-employment levels, grow up in households with the highest debt ratios in G7 countries, and increasingly find that their academic careers do not prepare them for the workplace.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton to Brantford Rail Trail
    Thanks to Our Donors Who Helped Build the Trails TheThe Hamilton-Brantford-CambridgeHamilton-Brantford-Cambridge LinkageLinkage ofof TrailsTrails The trails are provided free for public use, but the cost to acquire the land and build the four trails approached $1.5 million. The funds were provided P by generous donations from the following corporations, individuals and like-minded foundations. In 1993, the City of Brantford commenced its Gordon Glaves Memorial Pathway A major trail system now links the cities of Hamilton, Station Masters Honour Roll along the scenic Grand River. Brantford and Cambridge. These 80 kms of trail form a u SC Johnson and Son, Limited major component in the southern Ontario loop of the u Canadian General-Tower Trans Canada Trail System. u Trans Canada Trail Foundation When opened in 1994 by the Grand River Conservation Authority, u The Jean Rich Foundation the Cambridge to Paris Rail Trail was one of the first abandoned rail lines u Redland Quarries to be converted for recreational trail use in southern Ontario. u TCG Materials u Brant Waterways Foundation P u Province of Ontario In 1996, the Hamilton to Brantford Rail Trail was completed by the Hamilton P & Grand River Conservation Authorities and became Canada's first fully developed, Kilometer Club entirely off-road interurban trail. u Brantford Jaycees u CAA South Central Ontario ! u Canada Trust - Friends of the Environment Foundation In October of 1998 these three trails were joined by the SC Johnson Trail, u Ciba-Geigy through the generosity of SC Johnson and Son Limited of Brantford, to form a u Dofasco Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Vulnerability of Peatland Carbon in the Albany Ecodistrict of the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Ontario, Canada to Climate Change
    Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Assessment of the vulnerability Science and Research of peatland carbon in the Albany Ecodistrict of the 46 Hudson Bay Lowlands, Ontario, CLIMATE CHANGE Canada to climate change RESEARCH REPORT CCRR-46 Responding to Climate Change Through Partnership Assessment of the vulnerability of peatland carbon in the Albany Ecodistrict of the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Ontario, Canada to climate change Jim McLaughlin, Maara Packalen, and Bharat Shrestha Forest Research and Monitoring Section Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2018 Science and Research Branch • Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry © 2018, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada Single copies of this publication are available from [email protected]. Cette publication hautement spécialisée Assessment of the Vulnerability of Peatland Carbon in the Albany Ecodistrict of the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Ontario, Canada to Climate Change n’est disponible qu’en anglais conformément au Règlement 671/92, selon lequel il n’est pas obligatoire de la traduire en vertu de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir des renseignements en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des Richesses naturelles et des Forêts au [email protected]. Some of the information in this document may not be compatible with assistive technologies. If you need any of the information in an alternate format, please contact [email protected]. Cite this report as: McLaughlin, J., M. Packalen and B. Shrestha. 2018. Assessment of the vulnerability of peatland carbon in the Albany Ecodistrict of the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Ontario, Canada to climate change. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Science and Research Branch, Peterborough, ON.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Storage and Potential Methane Production in the Hudson Bay Lowlands Since Mid-Holocene Peat Initiation
    ARTICLE Received 28 Aug 2013 | Accepted 9 May 2014 | Published 11 Jun 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5078 Carbon storage and potential methane production in the Hudson Bay Lowlands since mid-Holocene peat initiation Maara S. Packalen1, Sarah A. Finkelstein2 & James W. McLaughlin3 Peatlands have influenced Holocene carbon (C) cycling by storing atmospheric C and releasing methane (CH4). Yet, our understanding of contributions from the world’s second largest peatland, the Hudson Bay Lowlands (HBL), Canada, to peat-climate-C-dynamics is constrained by the paucity of dated peat records and regional C-data. Here we examine HBL peatland development in relation to Holocene C-dynamics. We show that peat initiation in the HBL is tightly coupled with glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) through most of the record, and occurred within suitable climatic conditions for peatland development. HBL peatlands initiated most intensively in the mid-Holocene, when GIA was most rapid and climate was cooler and drier. As the peat mass developed, we estimate that the HBL potentially released 1–7 Tg CH4 per year during the late Holocene. Our results indicate that the HBL currently stores a C-pool of B30 Pg C and provide support for a peatland-derived CH4 contribution to the late Holocene atmosphere. 1 Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G3. 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B1. 3 Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.S.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Barrie, Ontario, Canada | Red Seal Recruiting
    Barrie, ON www.barrie.ca/ Barrie is a city located in the central part of the province of Ontario and home for 143,634 people. Barrie is a beautiful, lively and attractive city that offers ski opportunity, swimmable beaches and many park lands to enjoy. The city is known for as Age-Friendly Barrie, improving the quality of life for all residents in all ages. Being a city that has numerous community centres and recreational venues, the city of Barrie is definitely a great place to work, live and have fun! Weather Barrie has a humid continental climate with humid, warm summers and cold winters. The average temperature in Barrie ranges from -5°C in the winter to 27° C in the summer. The warm season lasts from May to September, the cold season from late November to March. During the Phone: 1-866-483-5954 Fax: 1-866-891-4360 Email: [email protected] beginning and end of summer, it is advisable to bring a light jacket for the evenings. Although winter in Barrie can be a bit cold, this can still be a perfect time to enjoy skiing and winter outdoor activities. To find out the current weather conditions in Barrie, click here. Location Barrie is located in Central Ontario on the western shore of Lake Simcoe. Driving Distances: Ottawa, ON……………413km (5 hours) Mississauga, ON……101km (1 hour) Toronto, ON…………..97.6km (1 hour) Niagara Falls…………211km (2 hours) Transportation Air Lake Simcoe Regional Airport (CYLS) is operated by both municipalities of Barrie and Orillia, ON. Lake Simcoe Regional Airport serves small to large recreational and corporate flights, regional and commercial aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Circles of Support & Accountability: an Evaluation of the Pilot Project in South-Central Ontario
    ________ Research Report __________ Circles of Support & Accountability: An Evaluation of the Pilot Project in South-Central Ontario This report is also available in French. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. Veuillez vous adresser à la Direction de la recherche, Service correctionnel du Canada, 340, avenue Laurier ouest, Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0P9. Should additional copies be required they can be obtained from the Research Branch, Correctional Service of Canada, 340 Laurier Ave., West, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0P9. 2005 N0 R-168 Circles of Support & Accountability: An Evaluation of the Pilot Project in South-Central Ontario Robin J. Wilson, Janice E. Picheca & Michelle Prinzo Correctional Service of Canada May, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The latter part of the 20th Century was witness to considerable renewed interest in restorative approaches to crime and offender management. Ironically, professional interest in restoration increased as the public’s cries for more punitive measures rang out loud and clear. Politically, such measures as detention, specialized peace bonds, registries, and long term supervision orders were instituted as a means to demonstrate that the system was serious about “getting tough on crime”. Meanwhile, meta-analytic reviews of the effects of incarceration and rehabilitative programming continued to suggest that longer, harsher sentences were not likely to achieve the sort of value-added that either the public wanted or the government hoped to achieve. No offender population has been more affected by these perspectives than sexual offenders. Understandably, the public has rather strong views about sexual offender risk management, and this has been reflected to a degree in policy and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Together: the Southern Ontario Airport Network May 2017
    Flying Together: The Southern Ontario Airport Network May 2017 FLYING TOGETHER: THE SOUTHERN ONTARIO AIRPORT NETWORK 1 1 INTRODUCTION Southern Ontario is set to experience significant growth over the next three decades and is one of the fastest growing regions in North America. Not surprisingly, demand for air travel across the region will follow suit, rising to approximately 110 million passengers over the same timeframe. This growth presents significant opportunities for the region, local communities and their airports. As growth comes to Southern Ontario it is critical that we are ready for it. By working together, our region’s airports will be better placed to support local economic development, and in doing so increase the competitiveness of the region, the province and the country. Successful cities and regions around the world have reaped the benefits of a network approach to supporting air service needs, and by better using the available airport infrastructure in Southern Ontario, our region can benefit as well. This approach will ensure that Southern Ontario is well placed to keep the jobs and economic benefits of growth in air service demand in the region. 2 FLYING TOGETHER: THE SOUTHERN ONTARIO AIRPORT NETWORK 2 UNPRECEDENTED AIR TRAVEL DEMAND IS COMING TO SOUTHERN ONTARIO As the most densely populated and economically productive region in Canada, Southern Ontario is an engine of the Canadian economy. The region is Canada’s export powerhouse, accounting for 37 per cent of the Canadian economy overall, 39 per cent of the goods exports and 48 per cent of the services exports. 88 per cent of Southern Ontario’s The region is also home to several Fortune population lives in the metropolitan areas 500 companies, 28 universities and colleges, of the Greater Toronto Area, Hamilton, and an innovation corridor that features the second-largest concentration of tech Kingston, Kitchener-Waterloo, London, companies in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    Newcomer Tour of Norfolk County Student Start Up Program participants Tourism & Economic Development Annual Report 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 3 Business Incentives & Supports ...................................................................................... 5 Investment Attraction ..................................................................................................... 11 Collaborative Projects ................................................................................................... 14 Marketing & Promotion .................................................................................................. 20 Strategy, Measurement & Success ............................................................................... 31 Performance Measurement ........................................................................................... 32 Advisory Boards ............................................................................................................ 33 Appendix ....................................................................................................................... 35 Staff Team ..................................................................................................................... 40 Prepared by: Norfolk County Tourism & Economic Development Department 185 Robinson Street, Suite 200 Simcoe ON N3Y 5L6 Phone: 519-426-9497 Email: [email protected] www.norfolkbusiness.ca
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem Overview
    i SUMMARY OF THE HUDSON BAY MARINE ECOSYSTEM OVERVIEW by D.B. STEWART and W.L. LOCKHART Arctic Biological Consultants Box 68, St. Norbert P.O. Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA R3V 1L5 for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans Central and Arctic Region, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 Draft March 2004 ii Preface: This report was prepared for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Central And Arctic Region, Winnipeg. MB. Don Cobb and Steve Newton were the Scientific Authorities. Correct citation: Stewart, D.B., and W.L. Lockhart. 2004. Summary of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem Overview. Prepared by Arctic Biological Consultants, Winnipeg, for Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Winnipeg, MB. Draft vi + 66 p. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1 2.0 ECOLOGICAL OVERVIEW.........................................................................................................3 2.1 GEOLOGY .....................................................................................................................4 2.2 CLIMATE........................................................................................................................6 2.3 OCEANOGRAPHY .........................................................................................................8 2.4 PLANTS .......................................................................................................................13 2.5 INVERTEBRATES AND UROCHORDATES.................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Election: Seat Clusters June to September Survey Results
    2019 Election: Seat Clusters June to September Survey Results August 2019 2 Overview In Canada, we count seats, not vote. Just like in American Presidential elections, you can win the popular vote and lose the election. In fact, that happened to Justin Trudeau’s father in 1979. The general way analysts address that is to look at seats by region. However, seats in the same region can move differently. This release tries to get closer to reality in the seat-by-seat contest. Our analysis combines two projects: • An analysis of federal election districts (which we call “seats”) that groups them into 14 clusters based on which parties are most competitive in those seats. Given the shifting dynamics of Canada’s party system, we have relied on only the results of the past two elections. However, to assess where the parties stand in these 14 seat clusters, we need a lot of data. • A merge of the most recent three national surveys that include federal votes, creating a unweighted total of 7,555 respondents and a weighted total of 4,900. In each of our surveys, we collect postal codes. That allows us to create a riding variable for almost all our respondents and to group their responses by the riding they are in. The deck below shows the output from the analysis. The key finding is that, with the NDP in the doldrums, the Liberals are in a strong position coming into the race. Not only have they cemented their hold on last elections core seats, they may be able to gain seats to offsets the losses they will likely experience in the Toronto and Vancouver suburbs and Atlantic Canada.
    [Show full text]