DOCSLIB.ORG

Two a LOCK CONSTRUCTED from a CONCEALED SPIRITUAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Two a LOCK CONSTRUCTED from a CONCEALED SPIRITUAL Two A LOCK CONSTRUCTED FROM A CONCEALED SPIRITUAL DISTINCTION 1. The Intellectual Backdrop Expounding his views on the nature of culture, the Viennese cultural critic and writer, Karl Kraus, once offered a ribald illustration. He remarked that he and his Viennese compatriot, the architect Adolf Loos, despite their different pursuits, were engaged in the same endeavor. Both of them, Loos practically and he “grammatically,” had done nothing more than show that there is a dis- tinction between an urn and a chamber pot and that it is this distinction, above all others, that provides culture with elbow room. The others, those who fail to make this distinction, are divided into those who use the urn as a chamber pot and those who use the chamber pot as an urn.1 Wit and sarcasm aside, Kraus was attempting to provide insight into the essence of culture as an expressive spiritual enterprise, by contrasting a cere- monial cultural artifact with a practical utensil belonging to the amenities of civilization. The aim of the contrast is to illustrate what in philosophical dis- course we are apt to classify as “a metaphysical difference” in two kinds of activities pursued by human beings, which is exemplified in this case by the use of certain manufactured utensils. It is described by Kraus as a “grammati- cal” distinction that is embodied in the concepts of culture and civilization. In drawing it, Kraus was expressing a philosophical desire to discriminate clear- ly between two central features of human life, manifested respectively as the spiritual and the material, the aesthetic and the functional, the ceremonial and the practical, or the ethical and the instrumental. The aim of this endeavor on his part was twofold. First, to demonstrate that an important difference emerges between practices and objects in human life that have religious, artis- tic, emotional or ethical value and purpose, and practices and objects, the value and purpose of which lies in their being useful and helpful in some practical or instrumental sense. Second, to castigate cultural trends and inno- vations that blur this important difference. The oblique manner in which the distinction between culture and civili- zation is illustrated through an insightful and humorous aphoristic example, as well as the way in which it is described as a “grammatical” rather than a “metaphysical” difference, both demonstrate Kraus’s injunction that the pro- found spiritual meaning of various aspects of human life can be expressed in art and religious ritual, but not explained through philosophy by means of a formulated metaphysical theory. Thus, a work of art—which demonstrates how an artist experiences the world and interprets it in a personally meaning- 94 WITTGENSTEIN ON THE HUMAN SPIRIT ful way—is an expression of something that cannot be meaningfully asserted and explained by means of metaphysics. It manifests the artist’s spiritual atti- tude toward life and what it encloses. Hence, the grammatical distinction be- tween objects and practices to which Kraus refers as “culture” and those that he refers to as “civilization” is not abstract. It is not formulated through some philosophical explanation of a metaphysical difference between the spiritual features of life that embody culture and the instrumental features of life that embody civilization. Instead, it is shown by means of a striking example that provides what later, in the context of his remarks on the meaning of words, Ludwig Wittgenstein calls “a perspicuous representation” of the “grammar” of our language.2 In this way, by providing immediate philosophical insight, the illustra- tion of the contrast is rendered into both a philosophical and an artistic achievement. It demonstrates a metaphysical difference between spiritual practices that provide for culture and instrumental practices that provide for civilization. This difference is perceived at once, without its having been ex- plicitly stated. The philosophical advantage of this aphoristic method of demonstrating the distinction between the concepts of culture and civilization is obvious. For, of course, once we try to state the distinction in an explicit way, we are forced to explain and support it. It may then become apparent that instrumen- tal practices and objects are often conjoined to aesthetic ones, as may be seen in styles of building houses, making furniture, fashioning clothes, etc.—all this despite Kraus’s doctrinaire efforts to separate the artistic from the instru- mental, due to concealed metaphysical assumptions about the spiritual es- sence of cultural practices. Oswald Spengler distinguished between culture and civilization in a dif- ferent way.3 His distinction was drawn within a metahistorical discourse, where it played a central role in what turned out to be a very ambitious at- tempt to formulate a new historical overview (or grand theory) of human life. This view emerges by comparing different historical periods in that to which he referred as “the great cultures” that human beings have created. In Speng- ler’s view, a great culture is the spiritual orientation of an historical group of people which achieves a unitary conception of its world, oriented on a dis- tinctive conception of the physical space in which the people live and act. This orientation informs all their activities: in art, religion, philosophy, science, politics, economics, and ways of waging war. The conceptual scheme put forward by Spengler purported to provide a grand historical over- view, regarding different periods of spiritual development through which such great cultures inevitably pass. He claimed that, like the seasons of the year, they divide into four consecutive periods. Of these, the first three are different subperiods of culture, the last one a period of civilization. Periods of culture, according to the view expounded by Spengler, are a spiritual stage distinguished by creative, artistic, religious, and scientific en-.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Marxism and Cultural Studies Douglas Kellner
    Cultural Marxism and Cultural Studies Douglas Kellner (http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/) Many different versions of cultural studies have emerged in the past decades. While during its dramatic period of global expansion in the 1980s and 1990s, cultural studies was often identified with the approach to culture and society developed by the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies in Birmingham, England, their sociological, materialist, and political approaches to culture had predecessors in a number of currents of cultural Marxism. Many 20th century Marxian theorists ranging from Georg Lukacs, Antonio Gramsci, Ernst Bloch, Walter Benjamin, and T.W. Adorno to Fredric Jameson and Terry Eagleton employed the Marxian theory to analyze cultural forms in relation to their production, their imbrications with society and history, and their impact and influences on audiences and social life. Traditions of cultural Marxism are thus important to the trajectory of cultural studies and to understanding its various types and forms in the present age. The Rise of Cultural Marxism Marx and Engels rarely wrote in much detail on the cultural phenomena that they tended to mention in passing. Marx’s notebooks have some references to the novels of Eugene Sue and popular media, the English and foreign press, and in his 1857-1858 “outline of political economy,” he refers to Homer’s work as expressing the infancy of the human species, as if cultural texts were importantly related to social and historical development. The economic base of society for Marx and Engels consisted of the forces and relations of production in which culture and ideology are constructed to help secure the dominance of ruling social groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Farmer Dialogue and Critique: Bakhtin and the Cultural Studies Writing Classroom
    4farmer.fm Page 186 Wednesday, April 8, 1998 8:12 AM Frank Farmer Dialogue and Critique: Bakhtin and the Cultural Studies Writing Classroom I repeated the line, “the idea was so simple, anyone could [have] thought of it, but it was so obvious that it never occurred to me.” I said that this was what a cultural critic needed to be able to do: to notice those simple-seeming, obvious things that usually go unnoticed. I said that this was what cultural theory was good for, helping us to see what is ordinarily invisible to the people who are actually members of the culture being studied. I said I thought this writer had understood that concept, and had become a cultural critic. —Kathleen Dixon (112) n the excerpt above, Kathleen Dixon re- peats what she obviously feels to be a crucial I line from one of her student’s papers, a line that expresses the kind of epiphany that would be pleasing to any writing teacher, but perhaps especially gratifying to those writing teachers who employ a cultural studies perspective in their classrooms. This is so be- cause insight for the cultural studies teacher is not simply a fortuitous, cur- sory moment in the process of rhetorical invention but is, indeed, the very heart of cultural critique. I would like to suggest further, that what Dixon reveals in this passage may well be the central dilemma faced by instructors who teach from a cultural studies perspective—namely, the difficulty in making a liberatory Frank Farmer is an associate professor of English at East Carolina University where he teaches writing and graduate courses in rhetorical theory and history.
    [Show full text]
  • ED351735.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 351 735 CS 508 010 AUTHOR Min, Eung-Jun TITLE Can Political Economy of Communication Be Incorporated with Cultural Studies in Postmodern Era? PUB DATE Nov 92 NOTE 28p. PUB TYPE Viewpoints (Opinion/Position Papers, Essays, etc.) (120) Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Cross Cultural Studies; *Cultural Context; *Culture; *Ideology; Marxian Analysis; *Mass Media; Media Research; *Social Class IDENTIFIERS *Bourdieu (Pierre); Intertextuality; Postmodernism; Theoretical Orientation ABSTRACT While not attempting to review and criticize the whole body of research of the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, this paper explores the applicability of his theory of culture to one of the critical theories of mass communication, namely cultural studies. The paper discusses political economy and Bourdieu's economic rationality and presents an overview of Bourdieu's sociology of culture. The paper compares the two theories within four concepts which are regarded as the central notions of cultural studies: culture, class, ideology, and intertextuality. The paper concludes that Bourdieu's sociology, especially the analysis of the relations between economic capital and cultural capital, would be a way of resolving the lack of political economic aspect of cultural studies. One hundred thirty-three references are attached. (RS) ********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * ***********************************************************************
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Theory and Popular Culture by John Storey
    CUL T CULTURAL FIFTH EDITION U FIFTH EDITION R THEORYAND JOHN STOREY AL POPULAR THEORY CULTURE AN INTRODUCTION AN CULTURAL D In this fifth edition of his successful Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction, John Storey has extensively revised the text throughout. As before, the book presents a clear and critical survey P of competing theories of and various approaches to popular culture. O PULA Retaining the accessible approach of previous editions, and using relevant and appropriate examples from the texts and practices of popular culture, this new edition remains a key introduction to the area. AND R THEORY NEW TO THIS EDITION CUL • Extensively revised, rewritten and updated • Improved and expanded content throughout including: • New chapter on ‘Race’, racism and representation T U • New sections on the Panoptic Machine and Convergence Culture RE • Continued explicit links to the new edition companion reader Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader POPULAR • More illustrative diagrams and images AN INTRODUCTION • Fully revised, improved and updated companion website at www.pearsoned.co.uk/storey providing practice questions and extension activities, as well as annotated links to relevant sites on the web and further reading, and a glossary of key terms, to promote further understanding of the study of cultural theory and popular culture The new edition remains essential reading for undergraduate and postgraduate students of cultural studies, media studies, communication studies, the sociology of culture, popular culture and other related subjects. CULTURE JOHN STOREY is Professor of Cultural Studies and Director of the Centre for Research in Media and Cultural Studies at the University of Sunderland.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Cultural Awareness and Teaching English As a Second Language in the Context of Globalization
    Sino-US English Teaching, September 2017, Vol. 14, No. 9, 549-558 doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2017.09.003 D DAVID PUBLISHING Cross-Cultural Awareness and Teaching English as a Second Language in the Context of Globalization Natia Davitishvili Gori State Teaching University, Gori, Georgia The paper focuses on the inseparability of language and culture, highlighting the significant role of cross-cultural awareness and communicative competence in Teaching English as a Second Language (TESL) in the context of increasingly internationalized global world. Cross-cultural awareness has always been important in modern language studies, as preparing students for effective and competent intercultural communication requires not only mere teaching of linguistic skills like phonology, morphology, lexicology, and syntax, but also the vital component of cultural knowledge and awareness. Communication that lacks appropriate cultural content often results in an odd or humorous situation leading to misunderstanding and miscommunication. Therefore, the present paper claims that in TESL it is necessary to incorporate and develop aspects of cross-cultural awareness as a part of the course curriculum to immerse students in effective intercultural communicative competence. It is strongly believed that developing cross-cultural awareness through learning and practicing the patterns of the current lifestyle in the target culture will help the learners overcome both cultural shock and intercultural communicative barriers easier, compare the target culture with their own, and find the similarities and differences between them, thus coping with cross-cultural communication problems successfully. There are many challenges related to teaching English as a lingua franka in a cross-cultural context of globalization—English, not being the native language of the learners, triggers a great number of problems connected with teaching and developing cross-cultural awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • British Cultural Studies: an Introduction, Third Edition
    British Cultural Studies British Cultural Studies is a comprehensive introduction to the British tradition of cultural studies. Graeme Turner offers an accessible overview of the central themes that have informed British cultural studies: language, semiotics, Marxism and ideology, individualism, subjectivity and discourse. Beginning with a history of cultural studies, Turner discusses the work of such pioneers as Raymond Williams, Richard Hoggart, E. P. Thompson, Stuart Hall and the Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies. He then explores the central theorists and categories of British cultural studies: texts and contexts; audience; everyday life; ideology; politics, gender and race. The third edition of this successful text has been fully revised and updated to include: • applying the principles of cultural studies and how to read a text • an overview of recent ethnographic studies • a discussion of anthropological theories of consumption • questions of identity and new ethnicities • how to do cultural studies, and an evaluation of recent research method- ologies • a fully updated and comprehensive bibliography. Graeme Turner is Professor of Cultural Studies at the University of Queensland. He is the editor of The Film Cultures Reader and author of Film as Social Practice, 3rd edition, both published by Routledge. Reviews of the second edition ‘An excellent introduction to cultural studies … very well written and accessible.’ John Sparrowhawk, University of North London ‘A good foundation and background to the development
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 What Is Culture?
    Chapter 1 What is Culture? Introduction When you start to study any topic or subject it is always useful to think about how that topic or subject has been defi ned by others and what questions are raised about the subject in the process of attempting to defi ne it. Culture is no exception. Raymond Williams, the British cultural critic, famously asserted that ‘culture is one of the two or three most complicated words in the English language’ (Williams, 1976, p. 87). It is undoubtedly one of the central con- cepts in our understanding of how modern societies work, and for this reason it is worth spending some time considering the different ways in which the term ‘culture’ has been and is used. In this chapter we want to introduce you to the variety of ways in which the term can be understood and to suggest how the tensions between different meanings have informed current debates about the place of culture in the social sciences and the humanities. We also want to introduce you to a way of understanding culture that is widely accepted and used among contemporary cultural theorists and students of culture. This is not to suggest that the ‘true’ meaning of culture has fi nally been defi ned: because culture is one of the key concepts in our knowledge of societies both past and present, defi nitions are constantly being developed and refi ned. We can only make a start in this chapter. You, too, may want to revisit, rethink and develop your understanding of the term as you engage with the material in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARD a PACIFIC CIVILIZATION 75 Ronment and Encounter
    The Japanese Journal of American Studies, No. 18 (2007) Toward a Pacific Civilization Gary Y. OKIHIRO* TRANS-PACIFIC AMERICA “American Studies in Trans-Pacific Perspective,” the theme com- memorating the fortieth anniversary of the Japanese Association for American Studies, maps a key moment in U.S. history and in the field of American studies, and it delineates a spatial extension of the American experience from a decidedly Atlantic and European orientation to an equally emphatic Pacific and Asian cast, affirming the fairly recent and liberating turn in American studies from an exceptionalist, interior gaze to a field of vision across national fences. Needless to say, those more expansive horizons accompany the current realities of increasingly porous borders violated routinely by capital, labor, and culture, and, in the case of the U.S., by its new nationalism that aspires toward global dominance and empire even as it strives to shore up its borders against the alleged danger of immigrants.1 America, as well we know, was always a transnational space in which indigenous peoples formed themselves into nations with territories even as they crossed those divides for thousands of years before the arrival of foreigners, aliens from Europe who later claimed nativity calling them- selves “Americans” in the continent they occupied through conquest. Despite and perhaps because of that spatial and historical fact, U.S. Copyright © 2007 Gary Y. Okihiro. All rights reserved. This work may be used, with this notice included, for noncommercial purposes. No copies of this work may be distributed, electronically or otherwise, in whole or in part, without permission from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Utopian Optics: Theodor W. Adorno's Prisms: Cultural Criticism and Society
    Utopian Optics: Theodor W. Adorno’s Prisms: Cultural Criticism and Society Gerry Stahl Northwestern University, Evening School, Chicago Campus The English-reading world has recently been offered the alpha and omega of Adorno's systematic works.1 Not only do Dialectic of Enlightenment and Negative Dialectics present Adorno's original programmatic evocation and his final methodological summary respectively, but the Jargon of Authenticity and Philosophy of New Music footnote these with lengthy statements on two favorite leit-motifs: the polemic against Heidegger and the praise of Schoenberg. Yet, one suspects this is all too good to be true; it couldn't happen in America. Paradoxically, it seems, the very culture industry Adorno accused of fostering the uncritical attitude is now dispensing the systematic essence of the most advanced critical theory of society. But Negative Dialectics does not present the core of yet another philosophical edifice, adequately expressed in a systematic summary. Rather, it represents the thorough rejection of such monstrosities, in the end uncritical affirmations of an evil social totality. The methodology of Negative Dialectics’s "anti-system" is fundamentally a referral back to those concrete analyses it purports to summarize. Taken in isolation from Adorno’s prior investigations, Negative Dialectics—meant to formulate the self-consciousness of those instances of critical thought and to establish their priority over the retrospective methodology—is alienated from its object and open to summary rejection as an example of precisely that mode of deranged consciousness it unceasingly battles. How then is one to bring Adorno's thought into focus without distorting it, without obscuring what is unique and critical in it? The choice of his most systematic works for translation was not the author’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Thinking of Popular Culture Studies As
    RE-THINKING OF POPULAR CULTURE STUDIES AS INTERDISCIPLINARY SUBJECT ∗ Min Bahadur Pun ABSTRACT This paper discusses the emergence of popular culture as an interdisciplinary subject of research. The simplest way to define the term 'popular culture's is a culture widely favored by many people. It refers to beliefs, practices and objects widely shared among people. Some of the examples of popular culture are romance novels, science fiction, photography, pop music, journalism, advertising, television, video, computers, Internet, etc. The study of popular culture entered a new phase in the cultural and intellectual history with the establishment of the Center for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS) led by Richard Hoggart and Stuart Hall. Two things happened to the study of popular culture as an interdisciplinary subject: (1) the study of popular culture has included wide range of issues (2) scholars have intellectual freedom in this field, and they show no interest in establishing clear boundaries around it. Popular culture is always defined in contrast to other conceptual categories such as folk culture, mass culture, dominant culture, and working class culture. Thus, popular culture becomes the 'Other' for them, which largely depends on the context of use. Lastly, the paper discusses the role of popular culture in history, anthropology, sociology and literary theories. In theory, the study of popular culture is always around the debate on postmodernism. It assumes that postmodern culture no longer recognizes the distinction between high culture and popular culture. INTRODUCTION The study of popular culture has undergone a dramatic change during the last phase of the twentieth century. Following the social upheavals of the 1960s, popular culture is taken more seriously as a terrain of academic enquiry and has also helped to change the outlooks of more established disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Wicked City in the Cultural Criticism of O
    LIMES: Borderland Studies ISSN 2029-7475 print / ISSN 2029-7483 online 2011 Volume 4(1): 64–74 doi: 10.3846/20290187.2011.577175 THE MYTH OF THE WICKED CITY IN THE CULTURAL CRITICISM OF O. SPENGLER Gábor Kovács Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Philosophical Research, H-1119 Budapest, Etele ut 59-61 E-mail: [email protected] O. Spengler was one of the leading protagonists of cultural criticism in the 20th century. His oeuvre had been rooted in the German intellectual climate of the pre-war period and war years. The German tradition based on an ambivalent relation to modernity, after the German defeat suffered at the end of the First World War, emerged as the movement of “conservative revolution”. This new kind of conservatism, on the one hand, enthusiastically greeted technological advancement, while, on the other hand, rejected social and political moderni- zation. The opposition of the city and the country-side was a central theme of this way of thought. Spengler in his “morphology of world history” gave an outstanding place to this opposition. Our paper offers a reconstruction, in this respect, of the theory of Spengler. Keywords: caesarism, civilization, conservative revolution, culture, decline, de- mocracy, morphology of world history, progress. Introduction It is impossible to find an author in the philosophy of the 20th century who criticized in a harder manner the megalopolis and its way of life than Oswald Spengler. His challeng- ing, astounding and sometimes alarming metaphors are almost always interconnected with the critique of urban civilization. In his magnum opus entitled The Decline of the West metropolis appears in many forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural Communication and Teaching Culturally Diverse Learners 3 from Another and Influence How One Interprets Or Lives in a Culture (Nieto, 2010)
    APTE CH R Intercultural 1 Communication and Teaching Culturally Diverse Learners Overview Home has really less to do with a piece of soil than, you could say, with a piece of soul. —Pico Iyer (2013) For most immigrants, “home” is a more complex and ever-changing phenomenon than just a place of residence or settlement; home is also an inner sense of belonging to one culture while learning to live and settle in another. Granted, immigrant experiences can be very different; they can involve both happy and unhappy memories. Nevertheless, the English to speakers of other languages (ESOL) student may not yet fully understand the process of adapting to a new home and navigating between or even among cultures. English language teachers simultaneously validate deep feelings their students have about their origins and introduce these students to a new language and culture. Intercultural work is often referred to as work that involves crossing borders, bridges, or territories, three common “journey” metaphors that imply a transformation of some kind. We inherently possess diverse cultural orientations to the world, which cause us to interpret events differently. Exploring intercultural differences, even the slightest of dif- ferences, such as the way someone looks or doesn’t look you in the eye, can evoke differ- ent emotional and physical responses. English language teachers shift and enter different mindsets and worldviews when they teach students with different cultural backgrounds, values, and life experiences. However, with curiosity, knowledge, and experience, educators learn to accommodate differences and adapt their lessons accordingly. For example, you might decide to have gender-based groupings because some members of the class may feel uncomfortable conversing in mixed company.
    [Show full text]