DOCSLIB.ORG

GREAT LAKES REVIVAL How Restoring Polluted Waters Leads to Rebirth of Great Lakes Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GREAT LAKES REVIVAL How Restoring Polluted Waters Leads to Rebirth of Great Lakes Communities GREAT LAKES REVIVAL How Restoring Polluted Waters Leads to Rebirth of Great Lakes Communities IAGLR GREAT LAKES REVIVAL How Restoring Polluted Waters Leads to Rebirth of Great Lakes Communities Co-edited by John H. Hartig University of Windsor Gail Krantzberg McMaster University John C. Austin The Brookings Institution Paula McIntyre International Association for Great Lakes Research IAGLR ©2019 International Association for Great Lakes Research 4840 South State Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 USA iaglr.org 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is a collaborative effort among numerous Canadian and U.S. researchers, agencies, institutions, and nongovernmental organizations. Any binational effort covering such a broad scope, by nature, requires considerable collaboration and numerous contributions. Without their significant contributions, this report would not have been possible. We also gratefully acknowledge all the stakeholders in the 43 Areas of Concern over the past 34 years who are the lifeblood of these restoration efforts. The lessons learned presented in this report were developed from a symposium titled “Restoring Great Lakes Areas of Concern” convened at the 2017 annual conference of the International Association for Great Lakes Research. Symposium co-sponsors included the Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society, the International Association for Great Lakes Research, the Great Lakes Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge, and the International Joint Commission. We gratefully acknowledge their contributions and input. This project was made possible by a grant from The Erb Family Foundation to the International Association for Great Lakes Research to review and evaluate what has been achieved and learned over the past more than three decades of the remedial action plan program to clean up Great Lakes Areas of Concern. We are grateful for their support and leadership on Great Lakes issues. The views expressed in the St. Louis River case study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. On the cover Background photo: Detroit riverfront circa early 2000s (courtesy of Detroit Riverfront Conservancy) Postcard photos, clockwise, from upper left: Detroit RiverWalk (courtesy of Detroit Riverfront Conservancy); Watching the fire boat on the Cuyahoga River (courtesy of Cuyahoga River Restoration); Collingwood Harbour Yacht Club with The Shipyards in the background (courtesy of FRAM Building Group); Activity along the Buffalo River (courtesy of Joe Cascio); and the Simcoe Wavedeck, Toronto (courtesy of Waterfront Toronto) iii CONTENTS Acknowledgements ...........................................................iii Executive Summary ...........................................................ix 1 Introduction .................................................................. 1 2 Buffalo River Cleanup Improves Buffalo’s Ecological Health, Economy, and Public Spaces ................................................................3 J. Jedlicka and J.H. Hartig 3 The Collingwood Harbour Story: From Shipbuilding Center to Great Lakes Pollution Hot Spot to Waterfront Revitalization ....................................11 G. Krantzberg and N. Farrer 4 Cleveland Flats’ Revitalization Linked to Recovery of the Cuyahoga River ............17 J. Goodman and M. Gigante 5 From Cleanup of the Detroit River to Revitalization of the Waterfront ...............27 J.H. Hartig 6 Economic Benefits of Remediating Contaminated Sediments at Hamilton Harbour’s Randle Reef .......................................................33 K. O’Connor and C. McLaughlin 7 From Lumber to Foundries to Revitalization: The Muskegon Lake Story .............39 K. Evans, P. Isely, and A. Steinman 8 From Cleanup of the River Raisin to Revitalization of Monroe, Michigan .............47 S.J. Bentley, M. Cochran, and J.H. Hartig 9 Economic Benefits Help Drive Cleanup of Severn Sound .........................53 K. Sherman 10 From Remediation to Restoration and Revitalization: The St. Louis River Story ....... 61 K. Williams, J. Hoffman, and N.T. French 11 Cleanup of Toronto Harbour Leads to Waterfront Revitalization ....................67 V. Francella, with input from M. Wolfe 12 Lessons Learned ............................................................79 Literature Cited .............................................................95 Appendix 1 .................................................................101 v List of Figures Figure 1. 43 AOCs identified in the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem .....................................1 Figure 2. River Raisin Heritage Trail system linking Downtown Monroe with River Raisin National Battlefield Park, the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge, Sterling State Park, historic districts and sites, waterfront parks, and cultural destinations ................................ 50 Figure 3. Map of municipalities in the Severn Sound watershed. .....................................54 Figure 4. Map depicting the Toronto and Region AOC, including its six major watersheds: Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Humber River, Don River, Highland Creek, and Rouge River ............68 List of Tables Table 1. Examples of Buffalo River habitat restoration projects completed with GLRI funding since 2012 .....................................................................................6 Table 2. A summary of waterfront development projects along the Buffalo River in Buffalo, New York, 2012-2018 ............................................................................9 Table 3. A summary of the fiscal impact of the proposed development of the former Canada Steamships property (now called The Shipyards) in Collingwood, Ontario. ............................15 Table 4. A timeline of significant activities related to the restoration of impaired beneficial uses in the Cuyahoga River AOC ................................................................21 Table 5. Flats development projects planned as of August 2018 .....................................25 Table 6. Summary of Detroit River environmental improvements .....................................28 Table 7. Summary of Detroit riverfront economic impacts in the first 10 years ..........................31 Table 8. Summary of the status of beneficial use impairments in Hamilton Harbour .....................35 Table 9. Total estimated benefits by beneficiary for the Randle Reef project and all other remedial projects for Hamilton Harbour ...........................................................38 Table 10. A timeline of significant activities related to the restoration of impaired beneficial uses in the Muskegon Lake AOC ................................................................41 Table 11. Major habitat restoration projects completed with GLRI, Great Lakes Legacy Act, and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding in support of delisting Muskegon Lake as an AOC ...............................................................................44 Table 12. List of sites in Monroe appearing on the National Register of Historic Places ..................48 Table 13. Park attendance, 2011-2017 ............................................................49 vi List of Tables continued Table 14. Estimates of economic benefits of River Raisin National Battlefield Park based on three different models .................................................................51 Table 15. River Raisin Heritage Corridor East Master Plan cost summary ..............................51 Table 16. Estimated total cost savings and monetary benefits generated by implementation of the Severn Sound Remedial Action Plan (RAP), compared to costs of the rehabilitation projects, 1991–2002 ...........................................................................59 Table 17. Highlights of progress in key indicators of the Toronto and Region RAP .......................69 Table 18. A summary of economic benefits of construction projects located on public lands controlled by Waterfront Toronto in the East Bayfront and West Don areas, and privately owned lands in adjoining neighborhoods .........................................................77 Table 19. RAP institutional structures to help achieve public involvement, implement an ecosystem approach, and build capacity for implementation of remedial and preventive actions .........81 Table 20. Contaminated sediment remediation costs in the 10 AOC case studies ......................84 Table 21. A summary of habitat restoration efforts in the 10 AOC case studies .........................86 Table 22. A summary of economic benefits resulting from the cleanup and restoration of 10 AOCs in the United States and Canada. ..........................................................87 vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HE GREAT LAKES are one of the world’s most distinctive, valuable, and emotionally resonant natural features. Their water basin and ecosystem both serve the people and define the character and lifestyle of eight U.S. states and two Canadian provinces. TThe ties to these waters and the bounty of the lakes have shaped and sustained native peoples for millennia. The beauty and grandeur of the lakes left European explorers and settlers in awe. These waters also supported the industrial and agricultural revolutions of the 19th and 20th centuries. These revolutions, in turn, powered the growth of Great Lakes’ cities and provided jobs and wealth to millions; yet over time,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lake Michigan Natural Division Characteristics
    The Lake Michigan Natural Division Characteristics Lake Michigan is a dynamic deepwater oligotrophic ecosystem that supports a diverse mix of native and non-native species. Although the watershed, wetlands, and tributaries that drain into the open waters are comprised of a wide variety of habitat types critical to supporting its diverse biological community this section will focus on the open water component of this system. Watershed, wetland, and tributaries issues will be addressed in the Northeastern Morainal Natural Division section. Species diversity, as well as their abundance and distribution, are influenced by a combination of biotic and abiotic factors that define a variety of open water habitat types. Key abiotic factors are depth, temperature, currents, and substrate. Biotic activities, such as increased water clarity associated with zebra mussel filtering activity, also are critical components. Nearshore areas support a diverse fish fauna in which yellow perch, rockbass and smallmouth bass are the more commonly found species in Illinois waters. Largemouth bass, rockbass, and yellow perch are commonly found within boat harbors. A predator-prey complex consisting of five salmonid species and primarily alewives populate the pelagic zone while bloater chubs, sculpin species, and burbot populate the deepwater benthic zone. Challenges Invasive species, substrate loss, and changes in current flow patterns are factors that affect open water habitat. Construction of revetments, groins, and landfills has significantly altered the Illinois shoreline resulting in an immeasurable loss of spawning and nursery habitat. Sea lampreys and alewives were significant factors leading to the demise of lake trout and other native species by the early 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Settlement
    HISTORICAL SETTLEMENT CHAPTER 3 The period of historical settlement in the Highland Creek watershed began in about 1650 when aboriginal populations first made contact with European explorers and settlers. A major landmark on the north shore of Lake Ontario, the Scarborough Highlands lent their name to the creek immediately below them from the beginning. Its Mississauga name of “Yat.qui.I.be.no.nick”, recorded in 1796, and all subsequent names reflect its geographical position as the first creek below the high land. Travellers going westward on the lake would often camp at the mouth of the Highland Creek rather than attempt a passage along the base of the Bluffs in darkness or bad weather. The following sections provide an overview of the historical period including contact between aboriginal and Euro-Canadian peoples, key characteristics of the successive periods of settlement, the impact of this settlement on the environment, and a summary of heritage resources found in the watershed. 3.1 CONTACT 1650 TO 1800 Following the decimation and ultimate dispersal of the Petun and Huron by the Iroquois in 1650, southern Ontario was uninhabited for a few years before the Iroquois moved into the area to establish a number of large villages along the north shore of Lake Ontario for the exploitation of the local fur resources. One such village was Ganatsekiagon, located on the Rouge River. No villages of this size and importance have been found in the Highland Creek watershed, but evidence shows that the resources of Highland Creek were used by the native peoples of these villages.
    [Show full text]
  • GLRI Fact Sheet
    WISCONSIN PROJECTS FOR 2010-2011 Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Federal funds support critical restoration and protection work on Wisconsinʼs Great Lakes Wisconsinʼs agencies and Priorities for the Great Lakes. GLRI funds will help Wisconsin address Great Lakes Drainage Basins in Wisconsin organizations received almost $30 these priorities on Lake Michigan and Lake Superior million in grants for the first year of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative – a Lake Superior. federal basin-wide effort to restore and Economic Benefits of Restoration protect the Great Lakes. Restoring the Great Lakes will bring great benefits to our state. Work done A Vital Economic Asset under the GLRI will create jobs, The Great Lakes have had profound stimulate economic development, and Lake effects on our environment, culture, Michigan improve freshwater resources and ! and quality of life. They have fueled shoreline communities. A study our economic growth in the past and – conducted by the Brookings Institution if properly restored and protected – will Map Scale: found that fully implementing the 1 inch = 39.46 miles help us revitalize our economy in the regional collaboration strategy will future. generate $80-$100 billion in short and Lake Superior and Lake Michigan are affected by the actions of people throughout their watersheds. Lake Lake Michigan and Lake Superior long term benefits, including: Superior’s watershed drains 1,975,902 acres and provide: • $6.5-$11.8 billion in benefits supports 123,000 people. Lake Michigan’s watershed from tourism, fishing and drains 9,105,558 acres and supports 2,352,417 • Sport fishing opportunities for people. more than 250,000 anglers, recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes/Big Rivers Fisheries Operational Plan Accomplishment
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fisheries Operational Plan Accomplishment Report for Fiscal Year 2004 March 2003 Region 3 - Great Lakes/Big Rivers Partnerships and Accountability Aquatic Habitat Conservation and Management Workforce Management Aquatic Species Conservation and Aquatic Invasive Species Management Cooperation with Native Public Use Leadership in Science Americans and Technology To view monthly issues of “Fish Lines”, see our Regional website at: (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Fisheries/) 2 Fisheries Accomplishment Report - FY2004 Great Lakes - Big Rivers Region Message from the Assistant Regional Director for Fisheries The Fisheries Program in Region 3 (Great Lakes – Big Rivers) is committed to the conservation of our diverse aquatic resources and the maintenance of healthy, sustainable populations of fish that can be enjoyed by millions of recreational anglers. To that end, we are working with the States, Tribes, other Federal agencies and our many partners in the private sector to identify, prioritize and focus our efforts in a manner that is most complementary to their efforts, consistent with the mission of our agency, and within the funding resources available. At the very heart of our efforts is the desire to be transparent and accountable and, to that end, we present this Region 3 Annual Fisheries Accomplishment Report for Fiscal Year 2004. This report captures our commitments from the Region 3 Fisheries Program Operational Plan, Fiscal Years 2004 & 2005. This document cannot possibly capture the myriad of activities that are carried out by any one station in any one year, by all of the dedicated employees in the Fisheries Program, but, hopefully, it provides a clear indication of where our energy is focused.
    [Show full text]
  • Highland Creek Watershed
    WHAT ARE THE WATERSHED’S HOW CAN WE ENHANCE THE WATERSHED? WHERE ARE WE? KEY ISSUES? Highland Creek What can you do? • Plant native trees and shrubs on your property. WATERSHED • Reduce or eliminate the use of deicing salt, pesticides, and fertilizers Report Card 2018 which can contaminate water. • Volunteer for community tree plantings, litter pick-ups, or other stewardship events: trca.ca/get-involved • Read the Creek Connect blog: highlandcreekconnect.ca Toronto and Region Conservation Authority THE SALMON FESTIVAL AT HIGHLAND CREEK Other Ontario Conservation Authorities Many residents are not aware that there are salmon in many Toronto region rivers. The What is a watershed? Salmon Festival, hosted at Morningside Park A watershed is an area of land, drained by a creek or stream into a each autumn, provides an opportunity for local river, which drains into a body of water such as a lake. Everything in residents to view the salmon migration and Stormwater Runoff a watershed is connected. Our actions upstream affect conditions connect with the beautiful natural ecosystem downstream. • Water from rain or snow runs off hard surfaces like pavement into found in Highland Creek. nearby streams. thesalmonfestival.ca • The high water flows associated with stormwater results in streambank erosion and increased flooding during storm events. GRADING What is a watershed What local actions are planned? A Excellent • Stormwater is also associated with poor water quality because it report card? carries sediments and contaminants directly into the river system. Highland Greening Strategy B Good Ontario’s Conservation Authorities TRCA and the City of Toronto are currently developing the Highland • Stormwater carries chloride from road salt to streams, ponds, and lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fish Communities of the Toronto Waterfront: Summary and Assessment 1989 - 2005
    THE FISH COMMUNITIES OF THE TORONTO WATERFRONT: SUMMARY AND ASSESSMENT 1989 - 2005 SEPTEMBER 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the many technical staff, past and present, of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Ministry of Natural Resources who diligently collected electrofishing data for the past 16 years. The completion of this report was aided by the Canada Ontario Agreement (COA). 1 Jason P. Dietrich, 1 Allison M. Hennyey, 1 Rick Portiss, 1 Gord MacPherson, 1 Kelly Montgomery and 2 Bruce J. Morrison 1 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, ON, M3N 1S4, Canada 2 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Lake Ontario Fisheries Management Unit, Glenora Fisheries Station, Picton, ON, K0K 2T0, Canada © Toronto and Region Conservation 2008 ABSTRACT Fish community metrics collected for 16 years (1989 — 2005), using standardized electrofishing methods, throughout the greater Toronto region waterfront, were analyzed to ascertain the current state of the fish community with respect to past conditions. Results that continue to indicate a degraded or further degrading environment include an overall reduction in fish abundance, a high composition of benthivores, an increase in invasive species, an increase in generalist species biomass, yet a decrease in specialist species biomass, and a decrease in cool water Electrofishing in the Toronto Harbour thermal guild species biomass in embayments. Results that may indicate a change in a positive community health direction include no significant changes to species richness, a marked increase in diversity in embayments, a decline in non-native species in embayments and open coasts (despite the invasion of round goby), a recent increase in native species biomass, fluctuating native piscivore dynamics, increased walleye abundance, and a reduction in the proportion of degradation tolerant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Greening Resource Guide Highland Creek Acknowlegements
    Highland Creek Watershed For more information visit www.trca.on.ca/highland or email: [email protected] Neighbourhood Greening ResouRce Guide Highland Creek acknowlegements TRcA would like to thank the volunteers, partners and funders that contributed to the development of the Neighbourhood Greening Resource Guide, especially: Kevin Freiburger, sir sanford Fleming college; Daniel Growden, sir sanford Fleming college; Laura Myers, sir sanford Fleming college; Miriam Odermatt, sir sanford Fleming college; Vaskar Thapa, Toronto and Region conservation intern Matthew Smith, Toronto and Region conservation Volunteer; and The Ontario Trillium Foundation for funding support table of contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Highland Creek Watershed ................................................................................................................ 9 Milliken Park Neighbourhood Greening Plan ............................................................................... 10 Neighbourhood Greening Resources: creating Natural Landscapes ...........................................................................................................................................12 Water-Wise Actions ..............................................................................................................................................................15 Growing Local Food ............................................................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Current Pressures Impacting Lake Erie
    STATE OF THE GREAT LAKES 2005 WHAWHATT AREARE THETHE CURRENTCURRENT PRESSURESPRESSURES IMPIMPACTINGACTING LAKELAKE ERIE?ERIE? Land use practices, nutrient inputs, and the introduction of non-native invasive species are the greatest threats Land use, nutrient inputs, natural resource use, chemical and biological contaminants, and non- to the Lake Erie ecosystem. Natural resource use and chemical and biological contaminants also continue to native invasive species are the greatest threats to the Lake Erie ecosystem. impact the Lake Erie basin. Pressures and Actions Needed Land use Lake Superior Land use changes, including urban development and sprawl, intensification of agriculture, and Lake Huron construction of shore structures continue to negatively impact water quality and quantity, and Lake Ontario fish and wildlife habitats in Lake Erie and its Lake Michigan tributaries. Unless significant changes are made, this trend is expected to continue as demand for land Lake Erie conversion and use in the Lake Erie basin intensifies. In some areas of the Lake Erie watershed, over 90 actually render the ecosystem more susceptible to percent of the land has been converted to future invasions. Increased water transparency due to agriculture, urban and industrial use. A major focus the combined effects of nutrient control and zebra on the rehabilitation of remaining natural habitats mussel filtering has reduced habitat for walleye, and the physical processes that support them is which avoid high light conditions. Increased water required in order to restore Lake Erie's aquatic transparency combined with lower Lake Erie water ecosystems. Through best management practices, we levels has resulted in an increase of submerged must undertake rural, urban and industrial land use aquatic plants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laurentian Great Lakes
    The Laurentian Great Lakes James T. Waples Margaret Squires Great Lakes WATER Institute Biology Department University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Brian Eadie James Cotner NOAA/GLERL Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota J. Val Klump Great Lakes WATER Institute Galen McKinley University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Atmospheric and Oceanic Services University of Wisconsin-Madison Introduction forests. In the southern areas of the basin, the climate is much warmer. The soils are deeper with layers or North America’s inland ocean, the Great Lakes mixtures of clays, carbonates, silts, sands, gravels, and (Figure 7.1), contains about 23,000 km3 (5,500 cu. boulders deposited as glacial drift or as glacial lake and mi.) of water (enough to flood the continental United river sediments. The lands are usually fertile and have States to a depth of nearly 3 m), and covers a total been extensively drained for agriculture. The original area of 244,000 km2 (94,000 sq. mi.) with 16,000 deciduous forests have given way to agriculture and km of coastline. The Great Lakes comprise the largest sprawling urban development. This variability has system of fresh, surface water lakes on earth, containing strong impacts on the characteristics of each lake. The roughly 18% of the world supply of surface freshwater. lakes are known to have significant effects on air masses Reservoirs of dissolved carbon and rates of carbon as they move in prevailing directions, as exemplified cycling in the lakes are comparable to observations in by the ‘lake effect snow’ that falls heavily in winter on the marine coastal oceans (e.g., Biddanda et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Highland Creek Treatment Plant 2018 Annual Report
    HIGHLAND CREEK TREATMENT PLANT 2018 Annual Report March 28, 2019 CITY OF TORONTO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ANNUAL REPORTS HIGHLAND CREEK TREATMENT PLANT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Highland Creek Treatment Plant (HCTP) is one of four wastewater treatment facilities operated by the City of Toronto. This facility, located at 51 Beechgrove Drive has a rated capacity of 219,000 m3/day, or 219 ML/day, and serves an equivalent population of approximately 533,000. The Highland Creek Treatment Plant discharges into Lake Ontario and operated under Amended Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) Sewage No. 8261-99EP4S from January 1 to December 17, 2018, at which point it was replaced by Amended ECA No. 3448-B2UK8W, issued on December 17, 2018. The average daily flow rate in 2018 was 171.7 ML/day. Influent concentrations of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5), Total Phosphorus (TP) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) averaged 255.9 mg/L, 5.7 mg/L and 288.7 mg/L, respectively. Highland Creek Treatment Plant achieved the following effluent quality and loading rates in 2018 in comparison to ECA limits: ECA1 2018 Final Effluent Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 25.0 mg/L 15.9 mg/L Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD5) 25.0 mg/L 7.3 mg/L Total Phosphorus (TP) 1.0 mg/L 0.7 mg/L Escherichia coli (E. Coli)2 200 CFU/100mL 21 CFU/100mL pH 6.0 - 9.5 6.7 Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) (i.e. Dechlorination) 0.02 mg/L 0.004 mg/L TSS Loading Rate 5,475 kg/day 2,736 kg/day CBOD5 Loading Rate 5,475 kg/day 1,245 kg/day TP Loading Rate 219 kg/day 121 kg/day 1 Referenced from Amended ECA No.
    [Show full text]
  • The People of Scarborough
    ~THE SCARf>OROUGH PuBLIC LIBF{\RY I BOARP THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH Map of Scarborough ,.; .; .,; ::. .,; .,; .,; "'""- :;, -< "" -< "" "" 'ti "" "" S.teele~ Ave. V IV Finch Avenue III Sileppail.d Ave. 11 D St. REFERENCE POINTS 1. Thomson Park Z. Bluffer's Park J 3. civic Centre 4. Kennedy Subway 5. Metro Zoo Ikml 6. Guild Inn 1 mile! Map of Scarborough courtesy of Rick Schofield, Heritage Scarborough THE PEOPLE OF SCARBOROUGH The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Copyright© The City of Scarborough Public Library Board 1997 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise for purposes of resale. Published by The City of Scarborough Public Library Board Grenville Printing 25 Scarsdale Rd. Don Mills, Ontario M3B 2R2 Raku ceramic Bicentennial Collector Plate and cover photo by Tom McMaken, 1996. Courtesy of The City of Scarborough. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Myrvold, Barbara The People of Scarborough: a history Includes index. ISBN 0-9683086-0-0 1. Scarborough (Ont.) - History. I. Fahey, Curtis, 1951- . II Scarborough Public Library Board. III. Title. FC3099.S33M97 1997 971.3'541 C97-932612-5 F1059.5.T686S35 1997 iv Greetings from the Mayor As Mayor of the City of Scarborough, and on behalf of Members of Council, I am pleased that The People of Scarborough: A History, has been produced. This book provides a chronological overview of the many diverse peoples and cultures that have contributed to the city's economic, cultural and social fabric.
    [Show full text]