The Celtic War, 225-222 BC but Marcellus Was Already a Seasoned

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Celtic War, 225-222 BC but Marcellus Was Already a Seasoned The Celtic War, 225-222 BC Cisalpine Gaul, to carry on this war. ship in 222 BC, at the age of 46. His But Marcellus was already a seasoned The two consuls joined forces to campaign against the Insubres and commander before the Second Punic besiege the Insubres Celtic strong- Gaesatae Celts marked him as an War began. He had served as a hold of Acerrae with a combined extraordinary Roman commander. junior officer during the latter years force of four double legions. The of the First War with Carthage, Celtic King Britomartus responded by Following the Celtic invasion of Italy fighting against Hamilcar Barca's leading an army of 10,000 Gaesatae mercenaries in Sicily. In one hotly in 225 BC (see the Telamon campaign and Insubres warriors to ravage the contested battle he saved the life of featured in C3i Nr.6), Rome launched territory around Clastidium, a Roman his brother, Otacilius, and was a series of punitive expeditions into stronghold. ^ awarded the 'civic crown'. He then the Celtic homelands along the Po progressed through the normal series River in Northern Italy during 224- Marcellus, displaying his aggressive of offices during the interwar years. 223 BC. The consuls for 222 BC, character, decided to lead a flying In what would normally have been Marcellus and Gnaeus Cornelius column after Britomartus. Marcellus the culmination of a successful career, Scipio (the uncle of Africanus) were took only two thirds of the cavalry of Marcellus was elected to the consul- again allotted the province of the four legions, a little over 3,000 Marcellus was still organizing his and paralyzed with indecision, horsemen, and a picked force of 600 fleet at Ostia, Rome's main port at the Marcellus kept his head. Although velites. With this small detachment mouth of the Tibur River. While he realized that there was little Marcellus surprised Britomartus and most Romans were seized with panic danger that Hannibal could actually immediately offered battle. Britomartus hurriedly threw his troops into line, with nearly 8,000 infantry in the center and more than 1,500 cavalry on the flanks. Marcellus, in decidedly un-Roman fashion, rode out ahead of his army to engage King Britomartus in single combat. The two war leaders charged at each other, and Marcellus slew the Celtic King with one thrust of his lance. Thus he became only the third Roman commander in history to kill an enemy king in hand to hand combat, and despoil him of his armor. This feat was known as taking the 'spolia optima'. Marcellus then rejoined his detachment and lead them to an astonishing victory over the much larger Celtic army. For this victory, Marcellus was awarded a triumph upon his return to Rome. The Second Punic War Begins, 218-216 BC When the Second Punic War began, the Romans had no premonition of the magnitude of the struggle about to ensue. Hence, regular constitu- tional procedures for electing generals (two consuls and four praetors) were in effect. Normally, a Roman noble could expect to serve only one consulship in a lifetime. Truly extraordinary generals (with plenty of political pull) might be awarded a second consulship, but usually only after at least a decade had passed. So, even though Marcellus was recognized as one of Rome's top commanders, he was not called upon to serve in the first two years of the war. The defeats at Ticinus, Trebbia and Trasimene caused the Roman Senate to begin to rethink its policies, however. In 216 BC Marcellus, now 52 years of age, was elected as one of the four Praetors, and assigned to command of the fleet, to operate in Sicilian waters. When Hannibal enveloped and destroyed the army of the Consuls Varro and Paullus at Cannae, capture Rome, Marcellus nevertheless Marcellus correctly foresaw that the Marcellus also sent word to the immediately dispatched 1,500 arrival of any fresh troops would Senate that he was ready and willing marines to the capitol. Even though bolster the confidence of the populace to take the field against Hannibal, their numbers were insignificant, and help restore calm to the city. wherever he might be needed. The Senate ordered the Praetor to proceed to Canusium and relieve Varro of the command of the 14,000 fugitives of Cannae that had gath- ered there. Marcellus combined these demoralized troops with his remaining marines and hastily organized a new army. Meanwhile, two legions of new recruits and two legions of volunteer slaves and convicts were raised at Rome. These three weak armies were in no condition to confront Hannibal directly, but sought to maneuver to bring aid to wavering allied cities. Campaigning on Campania, 216-215 BC Capua, the second city of Italy and chief city of the province of Campania, led a wave of defections to the side of Carthage. Marcellus was therefore directed to Campania to protect the remaining allies. Marcellus first secured Neapolis (Naples), the chief seaport, with a strong garrison. But the city of Nola presented a more complicated problem. In this city, as in many others, the popular party favored alliance with Carthage while the aristocrats stood by Rome. Hannibal was in communication with the popular leaders of Nola to betray the city to him. Marcellus placed a strong garrison in Nola, and diplomatically won over some key popular leaders. Hannibal advanced to storm the city, expecting a fifth column to support him from within the city. Instead the Carthaginians were met by a power- ful sortie led by Marcellus. Although this affair was little more than a skirmish, it was played up back in Rome as the "Battle of Nola." The Roman people were desparate for some good news. Marcellus was able to ride the popularity of the action at Nola into a second election as Consul in 215 BC. However, both Marcellus and his colleague as consul, Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, were plebe- ians. Tradition dictated that at least one consul must be a patrician. showed. Marcellus, hard pressed, walls, Hannibal faced not only his Marcellus' political enemies in the reluctantly ordered a withdrawal army but two to three additional Senate took advantage of this to back into the city. The Third Battle of Roman armies in Southern Italy. drum up religious omens to force his Nola ended in a draw. Nero didn't Hannibal fought all through resignation of the consulship. The arrive till evening, and was re- Samnium, Apulia, Lucania and patrician Fabius was elected in his proached by Marcellus for spoiling Bruttium as well as in Campania. stead. It mattered little though, as the opportunity for a decisive victory. Marcellus' role, and the celebrated Marcellus was again given command But, as Nero was later to demonstrate Nola battles probably seemed quite of an army as a proconsul. during the Meaturus campaign, he insignificant to the great was a brilliant strategist and a hard Carthaginian. But in Rome the view Since the two legions of disgraced marcher. It seems likely that Nero's was different. The people were Cannae survivors had been banished flanking march was either poorly starved for any good news, and to serve the remainder of the war planned by Marcellus (too long a Marcellus provided what little they outside Italy, Marcellus was given the route) or foiled by Hannibal's flank got. At least he wasn't afraid to fight. XVI and XVII legions for his army. security detachments (which he These legions had been raised surely posted). The Sicilian Interlude, 214-211 following Cannae, and served the BC remainder of the year 216 BC as the Marcellus had campaigned for three Meanwhile, in Sicily, the faithful urban legions, the garrison of Rome. years in Campania, and was hailed as Roman ally King Hiero of Syracuse Marcellus was again assigned to a great general in Rome. But his had died in 215 BC. Hannibal sent a Campania, and once more saw action Campanian campaigns, and the Nola pair of mixed blood Syracusan- at Nola. This time, when Hannibal battles, must be viewed in perspec- Carthaginian officers, Epicydes and approached, Marcellus led out his tive. While Marcellus conducted a Hippocrates, to foment a revolt in the entire army. He took up a position defensive campaign from behind city city. Engineering a series of plots, close to the city, with his flanks assassinations and counterplots, it secured, and offered battle. Hannibal accepted the challenge, and a battle was fought that resulted in a draw. This, the Second Battle of Nola, enhanced Marcellus' reputation as the only general who could fight Hannibal and not get his command annihilated. Marcellus Strikes Back at Nola, 214 BC With steadily growing popularity, Marcellus was elected to his third consulship in 214 BC. This time, the Senate did not interfere. Marcellus retained his army, the XVI and XVII legions and was again posted to Campania. In his favorite locale, at Nola, Marcellus offered battle to the wily, one-eyed Carthaginian for a third time. This time, however, Marcellus would play to win. He developed a plan to out-Punic the master. The evening before the intended action, Marcellus dis- patched one of his tribunes, Gaius Claudius Nero (later victor at Metaurus) with a picked force of cavalry, velites and infantry out the back gate of Nola. Nero was ordered to make a wide, flanking night march so as to be able to fall on Hannibal's rear the next morning. On the morrow, Marcellus led out his army and engaged in a fierce battle with Hannibal. But Nero never appeared in 214 BC that Epicydes methodical Roman siege-craft was While Marcellus was gone, the was about to succeed.
Recommended publications
  • Ancient Roman Admirals"
    RRROM@NROM@N N@VY Caius Duilius Columna rostrata (Szczebrzeszynski, Wikipedia, Creative Commons). NAVIGARE NECESSE EST Non solo per gli appassionati di storia navale, ma per tutti gli amanti del mare e della classicità, ed in particolare per coloro che, come me, non sanno sottrarsi al fascino della civiltà romana. di DOMENICO CARRO Introduzione (in Italiano): genesi e nome di questo sito Web. Parte I VETRINA « CLASSICA» sulla storia navale e marittima dell'antica Roma (in Italiano): elementi relativi alla ricerca che da diversi anni sto conducendo al fine di pervenire ad una migliore messa a fuoco degli aspetti navali e marittimi del mondo romano. Dati sulle pubblicazioni maggiori (situazione e progetti) e bibliografia delle fonti antiche. Parte II ROMA MARITTIMA - Roma Eterna sul mare (in Italiano, con un po' di Francese e un po' di Inglese): altri miei contributi alla ricostruzione della storia navale e marittima dell'antica Roma e alla conoscenza dei Romani che si sono illustrati sul mare. Contiene alcuni saggi, qualche altro scritto minore e una bibliografia di fonti moderne. Parte III TESTI ANTICHI (in Italiano e Latino): alcuni scritti poco conosciuti, che trattano questioni navali o marittime secondo gli usi degli antichi Romani. Parte IV CONTRIBUTI ESTERNI (in Italiano): spazio predisposto per ospitare scritti di altri autori, quali ulteriori contributi alla conoscenza della storia navale e marittima dell'antica Roma. Parte V GALLERIA NAVALE (in Italiano): selezione di immagini navali romane (affreschi, mosaici, bassorilievi, sculture, monete e altri reperti) pubblicate su «Classica» o sulla Rete. Accreditamenti (titoli in Italiano e Inglese; commenti in Italiano): Guida alle risorse Internet d'interesse per la ricerca di altri elementi relativi alla storia navale e marittima dell'antica Roma.
    [Show full text]
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon Pirngruber, R. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Pirngruber, R. (2012). The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon: in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 - 140 B.C. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: vuresearchportal.ub@vu.nl Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. R. Pirngruber VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background Italy, Due to the Threat There from Throw the Entire Balance Over in the Following the Defeat of Hasdrubal Barca Hannibal
    • The numerical superiority they enjoyed with their new mercenaries; • The superior quality of their legions, probably the finest in the Roman army; and, • Overconfidence bred from seven years of campaigning without a serious defeat. Had the Scipios actually faced only 35,000 Carthaginians with over 50,000 legionnaires and mercenaries as they believed, their chances for success would have been good. But Hasdrubal Barca had two additional detachments: 3,000 Numidian cavalry under Masinissa and 7,500 warriors under Indibilis. And Hasdrubal Barca also were unable to obtain more troops from had a trick up his sleeve that was to Historical Background Italy, due to the threat there from throw the entire balance over in the Following the defeat of Hasdrubal Barca Hannibal. Instead, the Scipios hired on a favor of Carthage. at Dertosa (see issue Nr. 4 of C3i for large body of 20,000 Celt-Iberian Dertosa Battle Module) by the Scipio mercenaries. The Celt-Iberians were a While Hasdrubal Barca observed the brothers in 215 BC, Carthage responded mix of those two peoples, found mainly Romans from his position at Amtorgis, by sending reinforcements. Two armies in the wilds of central Spain. They had a he ordered the forces of Hasdrubal were dispatched, one under Hasdrubal's reputation for ferocity and fighting skill. Gisgo, Masinissa and Indibilis to younger brother Mago, and another Both sides confidently planned to take concentrate at Mago Barca's camp under a political rival of the Barca clan, the offensive in 211 BC. near Castulo. Once these forces were Hasdrubal Gisgo. For the next three united, it appears he intended to move years (214-212 BC), the three Publius and Gnaeus Scipio knew that north against the Romans with his Carthaginian armies battled the two Hasdrubal Barca was encamped north combined forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings on Coins: the Appearance of Numa on Augustan Coinage
    Kings on Coins: The Appearance of Numa on Augustan Coinage AIMEE TURNER1 iconography, which he began to develop and experiment with in the triumviral period, and continued to utilise into his principate.6 Many In 22 BCE, an as was minted bearing the of the images he employed focus on religious image of Augustus Caesar on the obverse and iconography which promoted Augustus as a 7 Numa Pompilius on the reverse. Discussion of restorer of Roman tradition. In 22 BCE, an this coin in the context of Augustan ideology as was produced that featured the image of has been limited.2 Although one aspect of the Augustus on the obverse and Numa Pompilius, coin’s message relates to the promotion of the second king of Rome, on the reverse. the moneyer’s family, a closer analysis of its Numa was the quasi-legendary second king 8 iconographical and historical context provides of Rome, following Romulus. He is credited important evidence for the early public image with establishing the major religious practices 9 of Augustus, particularly in regard to religion. of the city as well as its first peaceful period. To that end, this paper intends to establish the As one of the earliest coins of the principate, traditional use of kings in Republican coins it offers important evidence for the early and the development of religious iconography public image of Augustus and the direction he in early Augustan coinage. By ascertaining intended to take at that time. His propaganda this framework, the full significance of the as was fluid, changing to meet the demands of the of 22 BCE becomes clearer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Glimpse Into the Roman Finances of the Second Punic War Through
    Letter Geochemical Perspectives Letters the history of the western world. Carthage was a colony founded next to modern Tunis in the 8th century BC by Phoenician merchants. During the 3rd century BC its empire expanded westward into southern Spain and Sardinia, two major silver producers of the West Mediterranean. Meanwhile, Rome’s grip had tight- © 2016 European Association of Geochemistry ened over the central and southern Italian peninsula. The Punic Wars marked the beginning of Rome’s imperial expansion and ended the time of Carthage. A glimpse into the Roman finances The First Punic War (264 BC–241 BC), conducted by a network of alliances in Sicily, ended up with Rome prevailing over Carthage. A consequence of this of the Second Punic War conflict was the Mercenary War (240 BC–237 BC) between Carthage and its through silver isotopes unpaid mercenaries, which Rome helped to quell, again at great cost to Carthage. Hostilities between the two cities resumed in 219 BC when Hannibal seized the F. Albarède1,2*, J. Blichert-Toft1,2, M. Rivoal1, P. Telouk1 Spanish city of Saguntum, a Roman ally. At the outbreak of the Second Punic War, Hannibal crossed the Alps into the Po plain and inflicted devastating mili- tary defeats on the Roman legions in a quick sequence of major battles, the Trebia (December 218 BC), Lake Trasimene (June 217 BC), and Cannae (August 216 BC). As a measure of the extent of the disaster, it was claimed that more than 100,000 Abstract doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1613 Roman soldiers and Italian allies lost their lives in these three battles, including The defeat of Hannibal’s armies at the culmination of the Second Punic War (218 BC–201 three consuls.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia GALIJSKA KATASTROFA POD TELAMONEM W 225 ROKU P.N.E
    ZESZYTY NAUKOWE UNIWERSYTETU JAGIELLOŃSKIEGO Studia Prace Historyczne 144, z. 3 (2017), s. 427–439 doi: 10.4467/20844069PH.17.024.6939 www.ejournals.eu/Prace-Historyczne GALIJSKA KATASTROFA POD TELAMONEM W 225 ROKU P.N.E. – ASPEKT MILITARNO-PSYCHOLOGICZNY Bronisław Szubelak Brzeg ABSTRACT THE GALLIC DISASTER AT TELAMON IN 225 BC: THE MILITARY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT The Celtic tribes migrated into Northern Italy in the late 8th and 7th centuries BC. In 390 BC the Gauls sacked the city of Rome. The Romans believed that they would never be safe while the Gauls threatened their northern frontier, so they colonized the land in the northern part of Picenum in 232 BC. In 225 BC, a huge Gallic army swarmed southwards through Etruria. Some 50,000 infantry and 20,000 cavalry and chariots drawn from the Cisalpine Boii, Insubres, Taurisci and Transalpine Gaesatae plundered the region and annihilated the Roman forces at Clusium, 3 days of march north of Rome. At Telamon, however, they were intercepted by two Roman forces (8 legions and allies), approaching them from two opposite directions. The Gauls were forced to deploy their army fac- ing both ways. The line facing rearward, anticipating Aemilius, had the Gaesatae in front and the Insubres behind them. Facing the opposite direction, ready to meet Atilius, were the Taurisci and Boii. Gaesatae (probably javeleeners) fought naked, standing proudly in front of the whole army with nothing but their weapons to protect them. The Insubres and Boii, by contrast, wore trousers and cloaks. The strength of a Gallic attack lay in the fi rst onslaught, its power fuelled by the belief in a glorious afterlife, the desire for fame, and some hysteria fuelled by noise and chanting, and often enhanced by alcohol.
    [Show full text]
  • < ;-Thames & Hudson
    Philip Matyszak and Joanne Berry OF THE ROMANS With 217 illustrations, 135 in color -<�;- Thames & Hudson HALF-TITLE Bronze bust of (1616). Decius Mus typified the Augustus, formerly Octavian, warrior aristocracy of the early 27-25 BC. Republic, when Roman leaders FRONTISPIECE Fourth-century were expected to command from mosaic of a house on a lake. the front. PREVIOUS PAGE Bust of Lucius OPPOSITE Romulus and Remus Cornelius Sulla, 138-78 BC. being suckled by the wolf, thought BELOW Decius Mus addressing the to be an Etruscan statue of the sth Legions, by Peter Paul Rubens century BC. © 2008 Thames & Hudson Ltd, London All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. First published in 2008 in hardcover in the United States of America by Thames & Hudson Inc., 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10110 thamesandhudsonusa.com Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 2008901001 ISBN 978-o-soo-25144-7 Printed and bound in Singapore by Tien Wah Press (Pte) Ltd The Triumph of Quintus Fabius by Samuel Elliot (1849). Fabius celebrated two triumphs, the first in 233 sc after his defeat of the Ligurians, the second in 209 sc after he recaptured Tarentum (which Hannibal had taken three years previously). Livy claims that Fabius brought back to Rome 30,000 captives and thousands of pounds of gold and silver, but he left behind statues of Tarentum's warrior gods -unlike his rival Marcellus who had stripped the temples of Syracuse in 211 sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing the Ancient Urban Landscape in a Long-Lived City: the Asculum Project – Combining Research, Territorial Planning and Preventative Archaeology
    Archeologia e Calcolatori 28.2, 2017, 301-309 RECONSTRUCTING THE ANCIENT URBAN LANDSCAPE IN A LONG-LIVED CITY: THE ASCULUM PROJECT – COMBINING RESEARCH, TERRITORIAL PLANNING AND PREVENTATIVE ARCHAEOLOGY 1. The Asculum Project. Aims, methods and landscape In recent years the University of Bologna has gained valuable experience in the field of archaeological impact assessment and development-led archae- ology. This has been achieved within studies focused on the phenomenon of cities and urban life in antiquity, this being one of the long-standing lines of research pursued by the University’s Department of History and Cultures (Boschi 2016a). Within this general line of investigation the Asculum Project was initiated as an agreed cooperation between the University, the former Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici delle Marche and the Municipality of Ascoli Piceno, primarily as a project of urban and preventative archaeology in a long-lived city. Through that cooperation the Asculum Project aims to generate new knowledge and understanding about the past of this important city while at the same time playing an active role in the planning process within a func- tioning urban landscape, producing benefits for a wide range of interests and helping to reconcile the needs of preservation and research within the ambit of sustainable urban development. The city of Ascoli Piceno is situated in the heart of the ancient region of Picenum within the valley of the River Tronto that provides a natural com- munication route by way of the Gole del Velino to the Tiber and thence to the Tyrrhenian side of the Italian peninsula. The city originated as the main settlement of the Piceni culture, during the Iron Age, at the confluence of the River Tronto and its smaller tributary the River Castellano.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Army Lists. Part 2). “Allies
    “IN DEATH GROUND”: ADDITIONAL ARMY LISTS. PART 2). “ALLIES AND ENEMIES OF ROME AND CARTHAGE, c. 264 to 202 BC”. The First and Second Punic Wars are longstanding favourites with ancient wargamers, thanks to the varied and effective armies which they featured, and of course to the characters of great commanders like Hannibal and Scipio. The conflict was also of enormous historical significance, leading to the establishment of Rome as the unchallenged superpower in the Western Mediterranean, and it was fought with desperate ferocity over a period of three generations. The two main protagonists, Rome and Carthage, are already covered by lists in the “In Death Ground” rule book, and the extra ones provided here are intended to complete the list of combatants. Some of these, such as the Gauls, had been major military powers in their own right for many years before the Punic Wars broke out, but others - the Spanish and Numidians for example - make their first appearance in history as allies of one or both of the rivals. It is in fact quite likely that they were encouraged to organise themselves into kingdoms by the examples of Rome or Carthage, and by the need for unity in the face of the perils of such a warlike age. It is therefore not always easy to set start and end dates for these lists, but most of the armies which continued their careers beyond the end of the Second Punic War will be revisited in a later supplement, under the heading of the “Armies and Enemies of Republican Rome”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: O.Hekster@let.ru.nl and G.deKleijn@let.ru.nl Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient People of Italy Before the Rise of Rome, Italy Was a Patchwork
    The Ancient People of Italy Before the rise of Rome, Italy was a patchwork of different cultures. Eventually they were all subsumed into Roman culture, but the cultural uniformity of Roman Italy erased what had once been a vast array of different peoples, cultures, languages, and civilizations. All these cultures existed before the Roman conquest of the Italian Peninsula, and unfortunately we know little about any of them before they caught the attention of Greek and Roman historians. Aside from a few inscriptions, most of what we know about the native people of Italy comes from Greek and Roman sources. Still, this information, combined with archaeological and linguistic information, gives us some idea about the peoples that once populated the Italian Peninsula. Italy was not isolated from the outside world, and neighboring people had much impact on its population. There were several foreign invasions of Italy during the period leading up to the Roman conquest that had important effects on the people of Italy. First there was the invasion of Alexander I of Epirus in 334 BC, which was followed by that of Pyrrhus of Epirus in 280 BC. Hannibal of Carthage invaded Italy during the Second Punic War (218–203 BC) with the express purpose of convincing Rome’s allies to abandon her. After the war, Rome rearranged its relations with many of the native people of Italy, much influenced by which peoples had remained loyal and which had supported their Carthaginian enemies. The sides different peoples took in these wars had major impacts on their destinies. In 91 BC, many of the peoples of Italy rebelled against Rome in the Social War.
    [Show full text]