DOCSLIB.ORG

IDP Situation Monitoring Initiative (ISMI) CCCM CLUSTER Monthly Overview of IDP Movements and Spontaneous Returns in North-West Syria, January 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IDP Situation Monitoring Initiative (ISMI) CCCM CLUSTER Monthly Overview of IDP Movements and Spontaneous Returns in north-west Syria, January 2019 Summary of Findings About ISMI & This Factsheet Communities assessed: 582 In January, assessed communities in north-west Syria witnessed a total of The IDP Situation Monitoring Initiative (ISMI) is an initiative of the Camp Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) Cluster, implemented by REACH 1 2 42,863 IDP arrivals, more than two thirds (71%) of whom arrived to the Total IDP arrivals: 42,863 (43%) northern Aleppo region and 29% of whom arrived to Idleb and surrounding and supported by cluster members. Total IDP departures:3 35,298 (117%) areas. As seen in December, hostilities between Government of Syria- Following a baseline assessment conducted at the end of 2016, weekly, bi- allied forces and armed opposition groups (AOGs), as well as inter- weekly and now monthly data collection cycles were initiated. This factsheet Total spontaneous returns (SRs):4 7,632 (2%) AOG violence continued to be driving forces behind displacements in the presents an overview of reported inward and outward movements of IDPs from north-west5, including an increase in aerial bombardments on Ma’arrat 1 to 31 January 2019. Such displacements were reported in 582 communities Total IDP arrivals, IDP departures and Spontaneous Returns by region: An Nu’man6 and Daret Azza7 sub-districts. in sub-districts monitored by ISMI. The coverage map in this section shows the sub-districts that were monitored for the most recent round of data collection, 24,906 30,460 Idleb and surrounding areas witnessed 24,906 IDP departures, more as well as the communities reporting movements. ISMI monitoring coverage than half (52%) of which were primary departures. Many IDPs reportedly varies over time depending on access. Displacements are identified through intended to move to Sarmada (1,494), Atma (1,569) and Qah (1,084) an extensive key informant (KI) network, either from alerts initiated by KIs or from follow-up by enumerators. At least two KIs are interviewed in each communities in Dana sub-district, likely due to their perceived stability within assessed community, and collected information is further triangulated through 12,403 the region. other sources, including CCCM member data and humanitarian updates. This 10,392 In parallel, the northern Aleppo region witnessed 3,686 SRs. Overall, approach allows for regular updates on IDP movements at the community level across sub-districts monitored by ISMI in north-west Syria. 3,946 almost all (90%) of SRs reportedly returned to solid or finished houses. More 3,686 than a third of these returned to Ma’btali (998) and Raju (502) sub-districts. The data used for this product was collected, triangulated and verified based 3 IDP departure figures reflect aggregated departures of both IDP and resident/pre-conflict populations. on submissions from ISMI’s network and select CCCM cluster members Idleb and surrounding areas Northern Aleppo region 4 Regular monitoring of spontaneous returns under ISMI monthly assessments was re-introduced from following the ISMI methodology. Due to differences in methodology and December 2018. 50+ IDP arrivals100 16 + IDP departures Spontaneous returns 5 UN News, ‘UN rights chief ‘alarmed’ by upsurge in attacks against civilians in Syria’s Idlib’, 19 February coverage, figures presented in this output may differ from official CCCM ■ ■ 100+■ 3412+ 2019. Cluster or UNHCR data. All data is for humanitarian use only. 6 1 The Washington Times, ‘Government shelling kills 10 in rebel holdout in Syria’, 29 January 2019. Some figures reported may be repeated displacements. 7 2 CCCM/REACH, ISMI Monthly Displacement Summary, December 2018 Al Jazeera, ‘HTS offensive could draw in Syria and Turkey’, 9 January 2019. Coverage, January 2019 !!! ! !! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!! ! ! !!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! ! !!! !!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!! !!!!!! !! ! !! !! !!!! ! ! !! !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!! !! !!! ! !!! !!!!!!! !! !!! !!!! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!! ! ! !!! ! !!! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! ! !!!! ! ! !!! !!!!! ! !!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!! IDP arrivals to sub-districts monitored by ISMI, January 2019 ! !!!!!!!!! ! !!! ! Percentage of total IDP Administrative !! !!!!!!! ! !! !! Al-Hasakeh !!!!!!!! ! !! ! !!!!!! !!!!!! !! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! arrivals by sub-district boundaries !! !! ! ! !!! !! ! ! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Aleppo !!! ! ! Ü ! !! ! Bulbul ! (1/1/19 - 31/1/19) !! !! !! !! Jarablus ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! Ar-Raqqa Raju ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !!! ! !! ! (2,968) Ghandorah !!! ! !! !! !!!! ! !! (3,102) ! !!!!! ! !!! ! ! Sharan 0.1% - 0.5% !!!!! ! !! ! !! !! ! (3,143) Governorate ! ! Idle! b! ! Suran - ! ! ! ! (2,089) ! !!!!! ! !!! !! ! ! !! ! ! (3,016) ! ! ! ! Aleppo 0.6% - 1.5% Lattakia !! ! ! Azaz Ar-Raee !! ! 1,071 ! ! Deir-ez-Zor Sheikh Mabtali !! (57) ! TTUURRKKEEYY (2,651) (232) (289) IDPs 1.6% - 5.0% El-Hadid Aghtrin Sub-district Hama (1,118) Menbij 5.1% - 11.3% Afrin Mare (165) Tartous Al Bab Jandairis (4,156) (57) Major displacements (4,840) (2,577) Most common sub-districts Qourqeena of departure ( >1,500 IDP ( >1,000 IDPs ) Homs Harim 1,340 (143) IDPs arrivals from sub-district) (109) Dana Salqin Daret Azza Outward External (2,686) (143) (268) displacement Darkosh Maaret Inward & outward Damascus Rural Damascus Tamsrin Janudiyeh (320) Armanaz displacement Internal (673) (92) (241) Quneitra Badama Idleb Sarmin Dar'a Zarbah ALEPPO As-Sweida (1,302) (348) (46) IDLEB (98) Jisr-Ash-Shugur Ariha Saraqab 1,261 (160) Mhambal (234) ! IDPs (262) Sub-districts monitored by ISMI Sub-districts not monitored Assessed communities (269) Ehsem 1,933 Maarrat AR-RAQQA Ziyara (382) IDPs An Numan (86) (3,222) Sanjar Kafr Nobol Heish LATTAKIA (52) (177) (656) Madiq CCCM CLUSTER Castle Khan Shaykun (154) (280) Feedback: CCCM Cluster Northern Syria Email: [email protected] HAMA Km 0 25 50 100 Info: www.globalcccmcluster.org, www.humanitarianresponse.info 1 IDP Situation Monitoring Initiative (ISMI) CCCM CLUSTER Monthly Overview of IDP Movements and Spontaneous Returns in north-west Syria, January 2019 IDLEB & SURROUNDING AREAS8 IDP arrivals to assessed communities in Idleb and surrounding areas9 Total IDP arrivals displacements, many of whom left their communities ( 1/1/19 - 31/1/19 ) Key Figures !( 6 - 100 !( 201 - 500 of origin in neighbouring Kafr Zeita (2,362) and !( Atma !( Deir Hassan !( 101 - 200 !( 501 - 1,545 Heish (1,710) sub-districts. Communities assessed: 191 ² Qah - Darhashan Major IDP arrivals (>420 IDPs) !( !(" !( Top intended destination sub-districts (# IDPs): !( !( 100+72+51+32+29 !( !( Sarmada !( !( Total IDP arrivals: 12,403 (36%) !( !(!( !( * Major departure communities Dana 5,463 !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( Afrin 1,802 Sub-districts with100+83+40+21+20 most arrivals (# IDPs): !( Ma’arrat An Nu’man 743 !( Ma’arrat An Nu’man 3,222 !(IDLEB !( Badama 702 Dana 2,686 !( !( !( !( Hesih 555 !( !( !( Badama 1,302 !(!( !( ALEPPO Kherbet Eljoz !( !( !( Maaret Tamsrin 673 !( !( !( !( Many IDPs reportedly intended to move to Sarmada !(" !( !( !( Heish 656 !( (1,494), Atma (1,569) and Qah (1,084) communities " !( !( !( !( !( Baksariya* !( in Dana sub-district, likely due to their perceived !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Total IDP departures: 24,906 (156%) !( !( !( !( stability within the region. !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Sub-districts with100+96+78+34+29 most departures (# IDPs): !( !( !( !( !( !( Maar Shurin !( !( !( !( !( Ghadqa Spontaneous Returns Haritan 5,063 !( " !( LATTAKIA !(" !( Heish 4,845 !( Ma'arrat !(" Between 1 and 31 January, 3,946 SRs were reported Kafr Zeita 3,957 !( An!( Nu'man " !( in assessed communities in Idleb and surrounding !( Jarjnaz* Suran 1,744 areas, over half of whom returned to Ma’arrat An !( !( " Kafr Nobol 1,444 !( !( Nu’man (2,326) sub-district. Almost all (87%) SRs !( Tah* !( to Ma’arrat An Nu’man sub-district returned to their !(" Total SRs: 3,946 (8%) !( !( Khan Shaykun* former homes. Many of these SRs were likely short- Kms HAMA term displacements following insecurity and aerial Sub-districts with most spontaneous returns: 0 25 50 100+22+16+7+6 bombardments in the sub-district. Ma’arrat An Nu’man 2,326 Most common push factors of IDP arrivals:10 Jisr-Ash-Shugur 519 Top 3 shelter types of SRs: IDP Arrivals 1st 2nd 3rd Kafr Nobol 382 (1) Solid/finished house 1,698 SRs More than half (58%) of the 12,403 total IDP Escalation of aerial bombardment 29 16 5 Madiq Castle 171 arrivals reported in the region in January were to Loss of income 14 19 13 (2) Solid/finished apartment 1,042 SRs Tamanaah 143 assessed locations in Ma’arrat An Nu’man (3,222), Escalation of ground-based conflict 34 6 0 (3) Unfinished/damaged building 777 SRs Dana (2,686) and Badama (1,302) sub-districts. Reduced access to humanitarian assistance 13 13 13 The majority (86%) of IDP arrivals reported other Anticipation of future conflict escalation 3 17 16 KIs reported a desire to return home, improved Overview safety and security, as well as increased access Following a sharp increase in IDP departures in communities within the region to be their last place of departure. Escalation of aerial bombardment, loss of income to shelter as the main pull factors for SRs to return January, several areas of opposition-held Idleb, to their community of origin. western Aleppo and northern Hama governorates Last sub-district of departure of arrivals (# IDPs): and escalation of ground-based conflict were 100+42+39+33+24
Recommended publications
  • I. Turkish Gendarmerie Fires Directly at Asylum-Seekers

    I. Turkish Gendarmerie Fires Directly at Asylum-Seekers

    Casualties on the Syrian Border continue to fall by the www.stj-sy.org Turkish Gendarmerie Casualties on the Syrian Border Continue to Fall by the Turkish Gendarmerie At least 12 asylum-seekers (men and women) killed and others injured by the Turkish Gendarmerie in July, August, September and October 2019 Page | 2 Casualties on the Syrian Border continue to fall by the www.stj-sy.org Turkish Gendarmerie At least, 12 men and women shot dead by the Turkish border guards (Gendarmerie) while attempting to access into Turkey illegally during July, August, September and October 2019. Turkey continues violating its international obligations, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, by firing live bullets, beating, abusing and insulting asylum-seekers on the Syria-Turkey border. These violations have not ceased, despite dozens of appeals and many human rights reports that documented these acts since the outset of the asylum process to Turkey in 2012.1 According to victims’ relatives and witnesses who managed to access into Turkey, the Gendarmerie forces always fire live bullets on asylum-seekers and beats, tortures, insults, and uses those they caught in forced labor, and deport them back to Syria. STJ recommends that the Turkish government and the international community need to take serious steps that reduce violations against asylum seekers fleeing death, as violence and military operations continue to threaten Syrians and push them to search for a safe place to save their lives, knowing that Turkey has closed its borders with Syria since mid- August 2015, after the International Federation concluded a controversial immigration deal with Turkey that would prevent the flow of refugees to Europe.2 For the present report, STJ meets a medical worker and an asylum seeker tortured by the Turkish Gendarmerie as well as three relatives of victims who have been recently shot dead by Turkish border guards.
  • SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020

    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020

    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 23 June 2020 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; in- cident data: ACLED, 20 June 2020; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 23 JUNE 2020 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 3058 397 1256 violence Development of conflict incidents from December 2017 to December 2019 2 Battles 1023 414 2211 Strategic developments 528 6 10 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 327 210 305 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 169 1 9 Riots 8 1 1 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 5113 1029 3792 Disclaimer 8 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 20 June 2020). Development of conflict incidents from December 2017 to December 2019 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 20 June 2020). 2 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 23 JUNE 2020 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
  • Environmental Research & Technology

    Environmental Research & Technology

    Environmental Research & Technology, Vol. 2 (4), pp. 191-210, 2019 Environmental Research & Technology http://dergipark.gov.tr/ert RESEARCH ARTICLE Solid waste management in non-State armed group-controlled areas of Syria case study - Jisr-Ash-Shugur-district Abdullah Saghir1 1 Syrian engineers for construction and development, Gaziantep, TURKIYE ABSTRACT The purpose of this study (technical assessment) is to understand the effect of the Syrian crisis on the solid waste management (SWM) sector in Non-State Armed Group (NSAG) controlled areas and define the worst communities located in Jisr-Ash-Shugur-district (JASD)/Idleb governorate of Syria. The assessment showed that: SWM sector, in general, is not supported by Non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The number of communities of JASD is ninety- nine about 262,246 persons (113382 Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs),147,449 resident population, 1,415 returnees, and population) live in it, all these local councils are not received or supported by SW equipment, tools, and machines, About seventy communities out of ninety-nine communities (92,195 persons of 262,246 persons) of JASD does not have dedicated works for solid waste collection , and Eighty 80 communities (120,237 persons of 262,246 persons) do not have SW containers, and 67 communities (77,195 persons of 262,246 do not have solid waste tractors with a trails are necessary for SWM. the average, maximum and minimum of SW production per capita at JASD communities (0.21; 0.79; 0.02) kg day-1. All the landfills of JASD are not sanitary and could be considered a randomly dumps. Keywords: Jisr-Ash-Shugur, solid waste, the Syrian crisis 1.
  • (ISIMM), July 2017

    (ISIMM), July 2017

    CCCM Cluster_ IDPs Sites Integrated Monitoring Matrix (ISIMM), July 2017 PCODES Camp/ Settlement Details # of IDPs in Jul 2017 Sectoral Analysis Protection Sanitation Education Health** Removal Shelter Waste Water Type of Total IDPs in Food PCODE PCODE PCODE PCODE PCODE GBV MA NFI No. Admin1 Admin2 Admin3 Admin4 Camps Gov. District Sub District Community Cluster Name Location Name Location Name_AR Location* Girls Boys Women Men Jul CP IS 554 530 456 348 1,888 40% 40% 40% 50% 30% 30% No No No No MC Yes روبار SY02 SY0203 SY020300 C1371 CP000002 Aleppo Afrin Afrin Baselhaya Afrin Roubar Camp 1 TC 2,189 1,938 1,396 1,198 6,721 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Yes No No No MC الحرمين (SY02 SY0204 SY020400 C1566 CP000007 Aleppo A'zaz A'zaz Shamarin Azaz Al Harameen (and extensions 2 IS 2,420 2,491 1,588 1,294 7,793 100% 100% 100% 100% Yes No Yes No الريان SY02 SY0204 SY020400 C1566 CP000290 Aleppo A'zaz A'zaz Shamarin Azaz Al Rayan 3 PC 2,911 2,738 3,159 2,717 11,525 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% No No No No MC Yes الرسالة )العرموطة( (SY02 SY0204 SY020400 C1566 CP000278 Aleppo A'zaz A'zaz Shamarin Azaz Al Resalah (Al Armuda 4 IS 1,650 2,152 1,579 1,794 7,175 10% 100% 100% 100% 10% 88% Yes No Yes No باب اﻻيمان SY02 SY0204 SY020400 C1566 CP000003 Aleppo A'zaz A'zaz Shamarin Azaz Bab Al Iman 5 IS 2,835 2,940 2,415 2,310 8,752 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Yes No Yes No باب النور SY02 SY0204 SY020400 C1566 CP000004 Aleppo A'zaz A'zaz Shamarin Azaz Bab Al Noor 6 IS 1,830 1,333 992 1,012 4,991 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% Yes No No No شمارين ) ضاحية الشهداء ,
  • Syria - Displacements from Northern Syria Production Date : 25/08/2016 IDP Locations - As of 16 August 2016

    Syria - Displacements from Northern Syria Production Date : 25/08/2016 IDP Locations - As of 16 August 2016

    For Humanitarian Purposes Only Syria - Displacements from Northern Syria Production date : 25/08/2016 IDP Locations - As of 16 August 2016 Total number of IDPs: 749,275 BULBUL Raju " RAJU Shamarin Talil Elsham ² Krum Zayzafun - Ekdeh Gender & Age SHARAN Shmarekh Sharan Kafrshush Baraghideh " Tatiyeh Jdideh Maarin Ar-Ra'ee Salama AR-RA'EE " Nayara Ferziyeh A'ZAZ Azaz " Azaz Niddeh 19% MA'BTALI Sijraz Yahmul Maabatli Suran " Jarez " Kafr Kalbein 31% Maraanaz Girls under 18 Al-Malikeyyeh Kaljibrin AGHTRIN Afrin Manaq Akhtrein Boys under 18 " " Sheikh El-Hadid " Mare' Women " A'RIMA Tall Refaat 24% " Men Baselhaya TALL REFAAT AFRIN Deir Jmal MARE' Kafr Naseh Tal Refaat 26% Kafrnaya JANDAIRIS Jandairis " Nabul AL BAB " Al Bab " NABUL Tal Jbine Tadaf " Shelter Type Hayyan T U R K E Y Qah Atma Selwa Random gatherings HARITAN Andan Haritan TADAF Unfinished houses or Daret Azza " " buildings Reyhanli Kafr Bssin Other Qabtan Eljabal Tilaada Individual tents DARET AZZA A L E P P O Babis Deir Hassan - Darhashan Hur Maaret Elartiq Kafr Hamra Rented houses DANA Hezreh - Hezri Termanin Dana Anjara Foziyeh Harim " Bshantara RASM HARAM EL-IMAM Open areas " Tqad Majbineh Aleppo Antakya Ras Elhisn " Total Tlul Kafr Hum Ein Elbikara Aleppo HARIM Tuwama Hoteh Under trees Kafr Mu Tlul Big Hir Jamus QOURQEENA Tal Elkaramej Sahara JEBEL SAMAN Um Elamad Alsafira Besnaya - Bseineh Sarmada Oweijel Htan Tadil Collective center Ariba Qalb Lozeh Barisha Eastern Kwaires " Bozanti Kafr Deryan Kafr Karmin Abzemo Maaret Atarib Allani Radwa Kafr Taal Kafr Naha Home Kafr
  • SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021

    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021

    SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 25 March 2021 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, 6 May 2018a; administrative divisions: GADM, 6 May 2018b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 12 March 2021; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 1539 195 615 violence Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 2 Battles 650 308 1174 Violence against civilians 394 185 218 Methodology 3 Strategic developments 364 1 1 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 158 0 0 Riots 9 0 0 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 3114 689 2008 Disclaimer 7 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). Development of conflict incidents from December 2018 to December 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 12 March 2021). 2 SYRIA, FOURTH QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 25 MARCH 2021 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
  • Idleb Governorate, Jisr-Ash-Shugur District April 2018

    Idleb Governorate, Jisr-Ash-Shugur District April 2018

    Humanitarian Situation Overview in Syria (HSOS): Sub-district Factsheets Idleb GovernorateGovernorate, Jisr-Ash-Shugur District JanuaryApril 2018 Introduction This multi-sectoral needs assessment is part of a monthly data collection exercise which aims to gather information about needs and the humanitarian situation inside Syria. The factsheets present information collected in MayFebruary 2018, 2018, referring referring to the to situation the situation in April in ALEPPO January2018. 2018. These factsheets present information at the community level for Darkosh 21four sub-districts sub-districts in in Idleb Jisr-Ash-Shugur governorate. districtSelected in Idlebkey indicatorsgovernorate. for Janudiyeh IDLEB theSelected following key sectorsindicators are for included the following in the sectors factsheets: are included displacement, in the shelter,factsheets: non-food displacement, items (NFIs), shelter, health, non-food food itemssecurity, (NFIs), water health, sanitation food Jisr- andsecurity, hygiene water (WASH) sanitation and education.and hygiene The (WASH) factsheets and do education. not cover The the Badama Ash-Shugur entirefactsheets range do of not indicators cover the gathered entire rangein the ofquestionnaire. indicators gathered in the questionnaire. For full visualisation of all indicators collected, please see the SIMAWG NeedsFor full visualisationIdentification of Dynamicall indicators Reporting collected, Tool, please available see thehere: SIMAWG http://www.reach-info.org/syr/simawg/.Needs Identification Dynamic Reporting
  • 011 Solid Waste Managment in Non-State Armed Group-Controlled

    011 Solid Waste Managment in Non-State Armed Group-Controlled

    Solid Waste Managment in Non-State Armed Group-Controlled Areas of Syria Case Study “Jisr-Ash-Shugur-District “ Abdullah Saghir 1 Abstract The purpose of this study (technical assessment) is to understand the effect of the Syrian crisis on the solid waste management (SWM) sector in Non-State Armed Group (NSAG) controlled areas and define the worst communities located in Jisr-Ash-Shugur-district (JASD) /Idleb governorate of Syria. The assessment showed that: SWM sector, in general, is not supported by Non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The number of communities of JASD is ninety-nine about 262246 persons (113382 Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs),147449 resident population, 1415 returnees, and population) live in it, all these local councils are not received or supported by SW equipment, tools, and machines, About seventy communities out of ninety-nine communities (92195 persons of 262246 persons) of JASD does not have dedicated works for solid waste collection , and Eighty 80 communities (120237 persons of 262246 persons) do not have SW containers, and 67 communities (77195 persons of 262246 do not have solid waste tractors with a trails are necessary for SWM. the average, maximum and minimum of SW production per capita at JASD communities (0.21,0.79,0.02) kg.day-1. All the landfills of JASD are not sanitary and could be considered a randomly dumps. , Keywords: Jisr-Ash-Shugur, Solid waste, the Syrian crisis. 1-INTRODUCTION Waste management accordingly from concept and practices that are used in different countries there are differences, particularly between developed and developing countries [1]. Solid wastes are any non-liquid wastes that arise from human and animal activities and are discarded as useless or unwanted [2].
  • CCCM Cluster IDP Sites Integrated Monitoring Matrix (ISIMM), August 2020/ 2020 بأ ، ﺣزﺎﻨﻟا تﺎﻌﻤ

    CCCM Cluster IDP Sites Integrated Monitoring Matrix (ISIMM), August 2020/ 2020 بأ ، ﺣزﺎﻨﻟا تﺎﻌﻤ

    ﻣﺼﻔﻮﻓﺔ اﻟﻤﺮاﻗ�ﺔ اﻟﻤﺘ�ﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﺘﺠﻤﻌﺎت اﻟﻨﺎزﺣ���، أب CCCM Cluster_ IDP Sites Integrated Monitoring Matrix (ISIMM), August 2020/ 2020 Total PCODES LOCATION SITE DETAILS Number of SECTORAL ANALYSIS ﺗﺤﻠ�ﻞ اﻟﻘﻄﺎﻋﺎت IDPs ﺗﻔﺎﺻ�ﻞ اﻟﻤﻮﻗﻊ اﻟﻤﻮﻗﻊ اﻟ�ﻮد February Shelter& WASH PROTECT FSL ION HEALTH EDUCATION اﻟﻤ�ﺎە / NFI اﻷﻣﻦ اﻟﻐﺬا��� اﻟﺘﻌﻠ�ﻢ ﻟﺼﺤﺔ اﻟﺤﻤﺎ�ﺔ واﻟ�ف اﻟﻤﺄوى وﺳ�ﻞ اﻟﻌ�ﺶ Boys (Children Education اﺳﺎس اﻟﻨ�ع اﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋ�ﺔ اﻟﺼ�� واﻟﻤﻮاد ﻏ�� اﻟﻤﻮاد اﻟﻐ�� Protectio اﻟﻌﻨﻒ ﻋ� Protectio Health Sanitatio زاﻟﺔ اﻻﻧﻘﺎذ Removal Violence ﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋ�ﺔ اﻻﺟﺮاءات Gender اﻟﺼﺤ�ﺎت ﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎ�� Girls (Children under 18) Women (Female Men- (Male Total Special Needs اﻟﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ Shelter Waste اﻟﺤﻤﺎ�ﺔ Based Action Water �ﺎﻻﻟﻐﺎم اﻟﺼﺤﺔ Mine ﺣﻤﺎ�ﺔ Child ﻟﺘﻌﻠ�ﻢ اﻟﻄﻌﺎم ﻏﺬاﺋ�ﺔ ﻟﻤﺄوى اﻟﻄﻔﻞ Food ذوي اﻻﺣﺘ�ﺎﺟﺎت adults) adults) Individuals Total Families اﻻوﻻد دون ﺳﻦ (PCODE PCODE Governorate District Sub District Community Cluster Site Name Type of Location* Shelter Details under 18 اﻟﻤﺎء NFI ** n n n اﻟﺨﺎﺻﺔ ﻣﺠﻤ�ع اﻟﻌﻮاﺋﻞ ﻣﺠﻤ�ع اﻻﻓﺮاد اﻟﺮﺟﺎل اﻟ�ﺎﻟﻐ��� اﻟ�ﺴﺎء اﻟ�ﺎﻟﻐﺎت 18 اﻟﺒﻨﺎت دون ﺳﻦ 18 وﺛﺎﺋﻖ اﻟﻤﻠ��ﺔ / HLP ﺗﻔﺎﺻ�ﻞ اﻟﻤﺄوى ﻧ�ع اﻟﻤﻮﻗﻊ اﺳﻢ اﻟﻤﻮﻗﻊ اﻟ�ﺘﻠﺔ / اﻟﻤﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ اﻟﻘ��ﺔ اﻟﻨﺎﺣ�ﺔ اﻟﻤﻨﻄﻘﺔ اﻟﻤﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪ S.N. PCODE Admin1 PCODE Admin2 PCODE Admin3 Admin4 Sites Waste_Removal Sanitation Education Special Needs Health Shelter Water اﻟﺼﺤﺔ اﻟﺘﻌﻠ�ﻢ Food GBV ذوي اﻻﺣﺘ�ﺎﺟﺎت _PCODE_ Total_Individua Total_Families PRT MA NFI ** CP اﻟﺨﺎﺻﺔ SN Admin1 Admin2 Admin3 Admin4 Sites Governorate District Sub_District Community Cluster Site_Name Type_of_Location Shelter_Details Land Type HLP Status Girls_June Boys_June Women_June
  • SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 19 December 2019

    SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 19 December 2019

    SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 19 December 2019 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; incid- ent data: ACLED, 14 December 2019; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 19 DECEMBER 2019 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 7110 925 3048 violence Development of conflict incidents from June 2017 to June 2019 2 Battles 1282 659 4216 Strategic developments 602 9 20 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 527 339 658 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 110 1 5 Riots 12 1 1 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 9643 1934 7948 Disclaimer 8 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 14 December 2019). Development of conflict incidents from June 2017 to June 2019 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 14 December 2019). 2 SYRIA, FIRST HALFYEAR 2019: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 19 DECEMBER 2019 Methodology on what level of detail is reported. Thus, towns may represent the wider region in which an incident occured, or the provincial capital may be used if only the province The data used in this report was collected by the Armed Conflict Location & Event is known.
  • Syria, Second Quarter 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project

    Syria, Second Quarter 2020: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project

    SYRIA, SECOND QUARTER 2020: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 28 October 2020 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; in- cident data: ACLED, 3 October 2020; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SYRIA, SECOND QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 28 OCTOBER 2020 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Explosions / Remote Conflict incidents by category 2 1051 193 496 violence Development of conflict incidents from June 2018 to June 2020 2 Strategic developments 439 1 1 Battles 415 203 760 Methodology 3 Violence against civilians 326 223 283 Conflict incidents per province 4 Protests 131 2 4 Riots 20 2 11 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 2382 624 1555 Disclaimer 7 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 3 October 2020). Development of conflict incidents from June 2018 to June 2020 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, 3 October 2020). 2 SYRIA, SECOND QUARTER 2020: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 28 OCTOBER 2020 Methodology GADM. Incidents that could not be located are ignored. The numbers included in this overview might therefore differ from the original ACLED data.
  • SYRIEN, 1. QUARTAL 2018: Kurzübersicht Über Vorfälle Aus Dem Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) - Aktualisierte 2

    SYRIEN, 1. QUARTAL 2018: Kurzübersicht Über Vorfälle Aus Dem Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) - Aktualisierte 2

    SYRIEN, 1. QUARTAL 2018: Kurzübersicht über Vorfälle aus dem Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) - aktualisierte 2. Version zusammengestellt von ACCORD, 20. Dezember 2018 Anzahl der berichteten Vorfälle mit mindestens einem Anzahl der berichteten Todesopfer Todesopfer Staatsgrenzen: GADM, November 2015a; Verwaltungsgliederung: GADM, November 2015b; Vorfalls- daten: ACLED, 15. Dezember 2018; Küstenlinien und Binnengewässer: Smith und Wessel, 1. Mai 2015 SYRIEN, 1. QUARTAL 2018: KURZÜBERSICHT ÜBER VORFÄLLE AUS DEM ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) - AKTUALISIERTE 2. VERSION ZUSAMMENGESTELLT VON ACCORD, 20. DEZEMBER 2018 Inhaltsverzeichnis Konfliktvorfälle nach Kategorie Anzahl der berichteten Todesopfer 1 Anzahl der Anzahl der Vorfälle mit Anzahl der Kategorie Anzahl der berichteten Vorfälle mit mindestens einem Todesopfer 1 Vorfälle mindestens Todesopfer einem Todesopfer Konfliktvorfälle nach Kategorie 2 Fernangriffe 5112 1064 5281 Entwicklung von Konfliktvorfällen von Jänner 2017 bis März 2018 2 Kämpfe 1860 610 5825 strategische 183 1 7 Methodologie 3 Entwicklungen Berichtete Konfliktvorfälle nach Provinz 4 gewaltlose Aktivitäten 137 0 0 Gewalt gegen 106 81 155 Lokalisierung der Konfliktvorfälle 4 Zivilpersonen Errichtung von Basen 60 0 0 Hinweis 9 Ausschreitungen/Proteste 54 0 0 Gesamt 7512 1756 11268 Die Tabelle basiert auf Daten von ACLED (verwendete Datensätze: ACLED, 15. Dezember 2018). Entwicklung von Konfliktvorfällen von Jänner 2017 bis März 2018 Das Diagramm basiert auf Daten von ACLED (verwendete Datensätze: ACLED, 15. Dezember 2018). 2 SYRIEN, 1. QUARTAL 2018: KURZÜBERSICHT ÜBER VORFÄLLE AUS DEM ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) - AKTUALISIERTE 2. VERSION ZUSAMMENGESTELLT VON ACCORD, 20. DEZEMBER 2018 Methodologie Die beiden oben dargestellten Karten dienen dazu, die Anzahl berichteter Todes- opfer (die Schätzungen beinhalten kann) mit der Anzahl an Vorfällen mit mindes- Die Daten, die in diesem Bericht verwendet werden, stammen vom Armed Conflict tens einem berichteten Todesopfer zu vergleichen.