DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Phase 2 Report – Development of Potential Salt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Phase 2 Report – Development of Potential Salt CENTRAL VALLEY SALINITY ALTERNATIVES FOR LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY (CV–SALTS) Strategic Salt Accumulation Land and Transportation Study (SSALTS) Draft Final Phase 2 Report – Development of Potential Salt Management Strategies S e p t e m b e r 2014 Prepared for SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY DRAINAGE AUTHORITY Submitted by CDM SMITH This page is intentionally left blank Table of Contents (continued) Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Phase 1 SSALTs Archetype Study Areas ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Phase 2 Scope of Work .............................................................................................................................................. 1-6 Section 2 Salt Balance ................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Regulatory and Compliance Goals ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Estimates of Salt Accumulation and Salt Extraction .................................................................................... 2-2 Section 3 Source Control Measures ......................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Source Control BMPs .................................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Land Management ....................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 De-Designation of Management Zones .............................................................................................................. 3-2 Section 4 Desalination and Brine Minimization Technologies ..................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Mature Treatment Technologies .......................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Emerging Treatment Technologies ..................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Concept Level Capital Cost Estimate for Salinity Treatment .................................................................... 4-3 Section 5 Brine Storage, Disposal, and Use Options .......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Deep Well Injection ..................................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Supply for Hydraulic Fracturing ........................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 San Joaquin River Real-Time Management ...................................................................................................... 5-2 5.4 Salt Accumulation Areas/Landfilling .................................................................................................................. 5-3 5.4.1 SJRIP .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5-3 5.4.2 Tulare Lake Bed ............................................................................................................................................................ 5-5 5.5 Ocean Disposal .............................................................................................................................................................. 5-6 5.5.1 Dicharge through EBMUD ........................................................................................................................................ 5-7 5.5.2 Other Ocean Disposal Options ............................................................................................................................... 5-8 5.6 Salt Marketability ......................................................................................................................................................... 5-9 Section 6 Brine and Salt Transportation Options .............................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 Trucking and Rail ......................................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Regional Pipeline ......................................................................................................................................................... 6-4 6.3 Concept Level Cost Estimate for Regional Brine Line ................................................................................. 6-5 Section 7 Salinity Management Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 No Action ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Alternative 1 – San Francisco Bay Discharge to EBMUD, Deep Well Injection in IAZ 6; and Disposal of Brine for Hydraulic Fracturing ............................................................................................. 7-2 7.3 Alternative 2 – San Francisco Bay Discharge to an Alternate Outfall; Deep Well Injection in IAZ 6; and Disposal of Brine for Hydraulic Fracturing ........................................................................... 7-3 7.4 Alternative 3 – San Francisco Bay Discharge to EBMUD, Deep Well Injection in IAZ 6; and Disposal of Brine for Hydraulic Fracturing; Lower San Joaquin River Real Time Management Program ......................................................................................................................... 7-4 7.5 Alternative 4 – San Francisco Bay Discharge to EBMUD, Deep Well Injection in IAZ 6; and Disposal of Brine for Hydraulic Fracturing; Lower San Joaquin River Real Time Management Program; Salt Accumulation Areas ............................................................................................................................... 7-4 7.6 Summary of Cost for the Salt Management Alternatives ........................................................................... 7-5 SSALTS Phase 2 Report i September 2014 Table of Contents (continued) Section 8 Phase 3 SSALTS - Evaluate Potential Salt Disposal Alternatives to Identify Acceptable Alternatives for Implementation ................................................................................................................................ 8-1 Section 9 References ....................................................................................................................................................... 9-1 Appendix A – Estimate of Landfill Costs at Kettlemen Hills Appendix B – Comments to Draft Phase 2 SSALTS Reports and Responses List of Tables Table 1-1 Matrix of Methods and Implementation Actions: Lower San Joaquin River Implementation Plan and SSALTS Phase 1 and Phase 2............................................................................... 1-8 Table 2-1 IAZ Designations ................................................................................................................................................................ 2-5 Table 2-2 Salt Loading and Salt Extraction by IAZ .................................................................................................................. 2-6 Table 2-3 Salt Loading and Salt Extraction by IAZ – TDS Degraded Areas Only ........................................................ 2-6 Table 4-1 Concept Level Capital Cost Estimate for RO Treatment Facilities and Extraction Facilities – Southern and Middle Central Valley IAZs ........................................................................................................... 4-5 Table 4-2 Concept Level Capital Cost Estimate for RO Treatment Facilities and Extraction Facilities – IAZ 6 ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 5-5 Table 5-1 Mass of Salt Removed by Deep Injection Wells ................................................................................................. 5-11 Table 5-2 Mass of Salt Removed by Supplying Water for Hydraulic Fracturing...................................................... 5-11 Table 5-3 Potential Revenue Stream from Supplying Water for Hydraulic Fracturing ........................................ 5-11 Table 5-4 Monthly Discharge at the San Joaquin River near Vernalis, CA Gaging Station (11303500) from 1963 to 2014....................................................................................................................................................... 5-12 Table 5-5 Monthly Electrical Conductivity at the San
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EXPERIMENTAL SALINITY ALLEVIATION at MALAGA BEND of the PECOS RIVER, EDDY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO by John S
    UMW PB80-177900 Experimental Salinity Alleviation at lalaga Bend of the Pecos River Eddy County, New Mexico (U.S.) Geological Survey Albuquerque, NM Dec 79 EE QE — 75 .U58w no.80-4 1979 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Technical Information Service 111111S. LIBRARY. OCT 05 198,, , '-,RARy Bureau or Acclamation Denver, Coinro, BUREAU OF RECLAMAT ON DENVER LIBRAF 111011111111 92015347 . BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA 1. Report No. 2. C CI ii fr's.-1 77 cinn SHEET USGS/WRD/WRI-80/a22,„ 4. Title and Subtitle 41. 5. Report Dam Experimental salinity alleviation at Malaga Bend of December 1979 the Pecos River, Eddy County, New Mexico 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Repc. No. John S. Havens and D. W. Wilkins USGS/WRI-80-4 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. U. S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division 11. Contract/Grant No. P.O. Box 26659 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87125 . 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period U. S. Geological Survey Covered Water Resources Division Final P.O. Box 26659 14. Albu.uer.ue, New Mexico 87125 15. Supplementary Notes . 16. Abstracts Upward-leaking brine, from a confined aquifer_ at the base of the Rustler Formation, mixes with fresher water in a shallow aquifer, resulting in discharge to the Pecos River .n southern Eddy County, New Mexico, of about 0.5 cubic feet per second of saturated .rine. Pumping brine from the aquifer at a rate greater than 0.5 cubic feet per second owered the potentiometric head in the confined aquifer.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Urban Development of Hallstatt
    About the Urban Development of Hallstatt CONTENTS 1. STARTING POINT 2 2. TOPOGRAPHY 3 2.1. Topographical survey 3 The Lake 3 The Mountains 3 The Communes of the Lake of Hallstatt 3 The Market Commune of Hallstatt 3 Names of Streets, Meadows and Marshes 4 2.3. The Morphology of the Villages 4 The Market 4 Lahn 4 3. URBAN DEVELOPMENT 6 3.1 The Development of the Traffic Network 6 The Waterway 6 The Paths 6 The Street 7 The Railway 7 The Pipeline, the so called "Sulzstrenn" 7 3.2. The Evolution of the Buildings 9 3.2.1. The Market 9 The Early History and the Age of Romans 9 The Founding in the Middle Ages 9 The Extension in the 16th Century 9 The Stagnation since the Beginning of the 17th Century until the catastrophic conflagration in 175010 The "Amthof" 10 The Court Chapel 11 The Hospital 11 The Hospital Chapel 11 The "Pfannhaus" and the "Pfieseln" 11 The Recession, Starting in 1750 until the Beginning of Tourism 11 The Flourishing of Tourism 12 3.2.2. Lahn 12 The Roman Ages 12 The Modern Times 12 3.3. The Analysis of the Sites and the Structures 15 3.3.1. The Market 15 The Market Place 16 The Landing Place 16 3.3.2. Lahn 17 The Agricultural Area 17 The Industrial Area 17 The Expansion 17 The Condensing 18 4. ANHANG 19 4.1. Commissions Relation dieses hochen Mittels Hoff Raths Herrn v. Quiex die zu Haalstatt abgebrunnenen Sallz Pfannen betreffend. 19 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquids Gathering Pipelines: a Comprehensive Analysis
    Prepared for: North Dakota Industrial Commission and Energy Development Liquids and Transmission Committee Gathering Pipelines: A Comprehensive Analysis Prepared by: Energy & Environmental Research Center University of North Dakota 15 North 23rd Street, Stop 9018 Grand Forks, ND 58202-9018 December 2015 EERC DISCLAIMER LEGAL NOTICE This research report was prepared by the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC), an agency of the University of North Dakota, as an account of work sponsored by the North Dakota Industrial Commission. Because of the research nature of the work performed, neither the EERC nor any of its employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement or recommendation by the EERC. NDIC DISCLAIMER This report was prepared by the EERC pursuant to an agreement partially funded by the Industrial Commission of North Dakota, and neither the EERC nor any of its subcontractors nor the North Dakota Industrial Commission nor any person acting on behalf of either: (A) Makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or (B) Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009
    Keuper Gas Storage Project Project Overview November 2015 Application Reference No: EN030002 THE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING (APPLICATIONS: PRESCRIBED FORMS AND PROCEDURE) REGULATIONS 2009 KEUPER GAS STORAGE PROJECT PROJECT OVERVIEW Zyda Law 60 Cygnet Court Timothy’s Bridge Road Stratford upon Avon Warwickshire CV37 9NW www.zydalaw.com Regulation No: 5(2)(q) Document Ref: 8.1 Author: Zyda Law 60 Cygnet Court Stratford upon Avon Warwickshire CV37 9NW Date: November 2015 Version: Final Contents 0. Executive Summary ............................................................................................... v Introduction ................................................................................................................... v The Applicant ................................................................................................................ vi DCO Development Areas .............................................................................................. vi The Project .................................................................................................................... vi Phase 1 ................................................................................................................... vii Year 1 ............................................................................................................... vii Year 2 ............................................................................................................... vii Phase 2 ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Great Saltworks of Salins-Les-Bains Grassias, I., Ph
    Literature consulted (selection): Great Saltworks of Salins-les-Bains Grassias, I., Ph. Markarian, & P. Petrequin, O. Weller, De pierre et de sel. Les salines de Salins-les-Bains, Salins-les-Bains, Musée (France) des techniques et cultures comtoises, 2006. Technical Evaluation Mission: 3–6 September 2008. No 203bis Additional information requested and received from the State Party: A letter was sent to the State Party on 10 December 2008 requesting the State Party to: Official name as proposed – Review the buffer zone for Arc-et-Senans and include by the State Party: From the Great Saltworks of the brine pipeline; Salins-les-Bains to the Royal – Provide assurances regarding the adoption of the Saltworks of Arc-et-Senans, the production of open-pan management plan and the implementation of the joint management structure for the two sites; and salt – Review the urban development of Salins-les-Bains in Location: Franche-Comté Region, the immediate vicinity of the Saltworks and the Doubs and Jura historical enclosure with the visual impact of the Département, casino. France The State Party sent a reply (80 pages) dated 27 February Brief description: 2009. An analysis of this documentation is included in this evaluation. The Great Saltworks of Salins-les-Bains have exploited the brine extracted from the considerable underground deposits Date of ICOMOS approval of this report: 10 March 2009. since the Middle Ages and, in all likelihood, since before that. It is one of the rarer testimonies to the production of open-pan salt (crystallization by heating), with its 2. THE PROPERTY underground and above-ground buildings and technical facilities still in place.
    [Show full text]
  • As Amended) the Preesall (Underground Gas Storage Facility
    The Planning Act 2008 (as amended) The Preesall (Underground Gas Storage Facility) Order Panel’s Report of Findings and Conclusions and Recommendation to the Secretary of State Panel’s findings and conclusions and recommendation in respect of an application for a Development Consent Order for an underground gas storage facility including associated development that comprises a brine pipeline and gas interconnector pipeline in Preesall, Lancashire Date: 21 January 2013 This page intentionally left blank Preesall Underground Gas Storage Facility File Ref EN030001 Preesall Underground Gas Storage Facility x The application, dated 30 November 2011, was made under s37 of the Planning Act 2008 (as amended) x The Applicant is Halite Energy Group Limited x The application was accepted for examination on 23 December 2011 x The examination of the application began on 24 April 2012 and was completed on 24 October 2012 x The development proposed is the creation of underground gas storage (UGS) caverns by solution mining of the Preesall Halite deposit in Lancashire to provide a working capacity of up to 600 million cubic metres at standard temperature and pressure (Mcm) together with associated development including wellhead compound areas, a gas compressor compound (GCC), a booster pump station, a seawater pump station, a brine outfall pipeline, a gas pipeline connecting to the national gas grid, pipelines and other elements. Summary of Recommendation: the Panel recommends that the Order be made, subject to modifications. Preesall Underground Gas
    [Show full text]
  • Kalium Lakes Limited
    KALIUM LAKES POTASH PTY LTD – S38 REFERRAL SUPPORTING INFORMATION Beyondie Sulphate of Potash Project BEYONDIE SULPHATE OF POTASH PROJECT SECTION 38 REFERRAL – SUPPORTING INFORMATION 30 OCTOBER 2017 PREPARED FOR KALIUM LAKES POTASH PTY LTD P a g e | 1 BY PRESTON CONSULTING PTY LTD KALIUM LAKES POTASH PTY LTD – S38 REFERRAL SUPPORTING INFORMATION Beyondie Sulphate of Potash Project Document prepared for: KALIUM LAKES LIMITED Contact Person: Brett Hazelden – Managing Director Email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 9240 3200 Street Address: Unit 1, 152 Balcatta Road, Balcatta WA 6021 Postal Address: PO Box 610, Balcatta WA 6914 Document developed by: PRESTON CONSULTING PTY LTD Contact Person Phil Scott – Director Email: [email protected] Website: www.prestonconsulting.com.au Phone: +61 8 9221 0011 Fax: +61 8 9221 4783 Street Address: Level 3, 201 Adelaide Terrace, East Perth WA 6004 Postal Address: PO Box 3093, East Perth WA 6892 KALIUM LAKES POTASH PTY LTD – S38 REFERRAL SUPPORTING INFORMATION Beyondie Sulphate of Potash Project CONTENTS PART A: PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 1 Short summary of the Proposal ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hallstatt-Dachstein Salzkammergut Cultural Landscape
    road along the lake-shore, being rejected from early in the 1960s and appropriate alternatives being encouraged in order to preserve the historie material. The cultural landscape of the Hallstatt-Dachstein region boasts a continuing organic evolution covering 2500 years. From the very beginning its history has been linked primarily with the economie history of salt extraction. Salt mining has always determined every aspect of life, as well as the architectural and artistic material evidence. Salt production on a major scale can be traced in Hallstatt back to the Middle Bronze Age in the mid 2nd millennium BC. The rich and variegated flora and fauna of the Identification Hallstatt-Dachstein region draws its support from a changing mountain landscape that reaches up to the snow-belt, thus providing many ecological niches, Nomination Hallstatt-Dachstein both large and small. It is remarkable for a mountain Salzkammergut Cultural region to have so many rare and endangered plant Landscape species that are on the Red Lists. The fact that many stretches of woodland in inaccessible locations are Location Provinces ofUpper Austria almost untouched by humans is worthy of special (nominated property and buffer mention. Owing to the low leve! of development and zone) and Styria and Salzburg the enclosed character of the region, these (buffer zone) conservation areas are also of major importance for those species that are very sensitive to human StateParty Republic of Austria interference. Date 16 July 1996 The significance of the glaciated Dachstein mountain, nearly 3000m high, lies in the great density of caves and the three important sites designed to explain the origin and formation of caves to the general public, each representing a different speleological type.
    [Show full text]
  • STARTING POINT in Hallstatt an Intensive Salt Mining Industry Can Be Traced Back to the Middle and Late Bronze Ages by a Lot of Single and Deposit Findings
    STARTING POINT In Hallstatt an intensive salt mining industry can be traced back to the middle and Late Bronze Ages by a lot of single and deposit findings. Generally three ways of salt extraction can be distinguished: 1) The extraction of sea salt by drying out the sea water in salt gardens. 2) The mainly prehistorical mining of crystalline rock salt. 3) The extraction of salt by dissolving salty water in a salt mine and the following drying up of the brine. The production of brine in the salt mine of Hallstatt has been proved since 1305. The processing of the brine demanded an appropriate concentration of the production facilies, specific forms of manufacturing, organisation, and technology at this very early stage. Taking into consideration the necessary equipment, the division of labour and the diversity of tasks, the evaporation of the brine is classified as a pre-industrial activity. Defining a "Single factory Town" as a place where one company structures the entire communal life, Hallstatt could be seen as the European prototype of this form of settlement. The subject of this lecture will focus on the modern times period, putting stress on the urban, the operational and the functional development of Hallstatt. Furthermore I will show that the urban structure of the area is mainly determined by operational necessities. The systematically planned medieval foundation of the site was destroyed by a catastrophic fire in 1750. All the company's buildings and about 35 town houses were destroyed in it. The reconstruction of the town of Hallstatt after 1750 and the dynamic development of tourism during the 19th century changed the site substantially.
    [Show full text]
  • Company History @ Murgatroyd's
    Company History @ Murgatroyd’s Hoffman Bearings The UK’s first ball bearing factory was established at New Street on Rectory Lane in Chelmsford 1898 by cousins Geoffrey and Charles Barnett and financed by American ball bearing machine manufacturer Ernst Gustav Hoffman from where the company took its name The Hoffman Manufacturing company rapidly expanded and soon achieved worldwide fame for their precision bearings boasting accuracy better than 1/10,000 of an inch (2.5 micrometres) for all their products Hoffman’s bearings were later used in the first transatlantic flights and extensively on machinery during WWI. For many years it was Chelmsford’s main employer with more employees than the Marconi Company 1892 – Hoffman patented a ball lathe 1897 – Barratt’s persuaded Hoffman to relocate in the UK Since the 1900’s Hoffman supplied all major manufacturers including Rolls Royce, Bentley, Daimler, Austin Riley and many more. They were also involved in the aircraft industry. The company amalgamated with Ransome and Marles Bearing Co and Pollard Ball and Roller Bearing Co in 1969. The works finally closed on 23rd December 1989. Mather and Platt Mather and Platt were established in 1852, a partnership between Colin Mather and William Platt. Colin had leased part of the Salford Iron Works from John Platt, William’s father, in 1845. Mather and Platt became famous for manufacturing centrifugal pumps. They also manufactured an innovative turbine pump designed by Osbourne Reynolds. Due to expansion they purchased a factory in Newton Heath, Manchester in 1900. The iron foundry was the last part of Salford Iron Works to be moved finally closing the factory in 1938.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX C Dispersion Modeling of Discharged Brine
    FINAL REPORT APPENDIX C Dispersion Modeling of Discharged Brine Smart Solutions for Engineering, Science and Computing Numerical Brine Dispersion Modeling in the Shubenacadie River Martec Technical Report # TR-07-12 March 2007 Management System Certified to: I SO 9001:200 Smart Solutions for Engineering, Science & Computing Martec Limited tel. 902.425.5101 1888 Brunswick Street, Suite 400 fax. 902.421.1923 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3J8 Canada email. [email protected] www.martec.com 1.0 Numerical Brine Dispersion Modeling in the Shubenacadie River The numerical modeling of brine dispersion in receiving waters of the Shubenacadie River is based on the USEPA supported Cormix Modeling System (Jirka et. al., 1996) for near-field mixing predictions, and a detailed RMA 10/11 finite element hydrodynamic/water quality river model (United States Waterways Experimental Station Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory) to quantify far-field dispersion. Various outfall configurations were considered as potential designs for brine discharge in the Shubenacadie River. These included the following: Option # 1 Submerged Outfall at mid-channel and shore-attached. Option # 2 Submerged Diffuser positioned across the river width (perpendicular diffuser) and along the riverbank (parallel diffuser). In addition, multi- staged diffuser configurations were considered where ports operate only under specific ambient and discharge conditions. Option # 3 Shore-attached discharge from pre-mixing pond. A mid-channel single outfall as well as the perpendicular diffuser were not considered feasible options due to the potential problems associated with sedimentation covering the outfall or ports, erosion, potential damage to the pipe from ice flows, difficulties associated with laying or directional drilling of the pipe or diffuser across the river and the required annual maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquids Gathering Pipelines in North Dakota
    Prepared for: North Dakota Industrial Commission and Energy Development Liquids and Transmission Committee Gathering Pipelines: A Comprehensive Analysis Prepared by: Energy & Environmental Research Center University of North Dakota 15 North 23rd Street, Stop 9018 Grand Forks, ND 58202-9018 December 2015 EERC DISCLAIMER LEGAL NOTICE This research report was prepared by the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC), an agency of the University of North Dakota, as an account of work sponsored by the North Dakota Industrial Commission. Because of the research nature of the work performed, neither the EERC nor any of its employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement or recommendation by the EERC. NDIC DISCLAIMER This report was prepared by the EERC pursuant to an agreement partially funded by the Industrial Commission of North Dakota, and neither the EERC nor any of its subcontractors nor the North Dakota Industrial Commission nor any person acting on behalf of either: (A) Makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or (B) Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report.
    [Show full text]