Quantum matter without quasiparticles
!
M.I.T. March 13, 2014 ! Subir Sachdev
Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD William Witczak-Krempa Perimeter Erik Sorensen McMaster Andrew Lucas Harvard
Raghu Mahajan Stanford Sean Hartnoll Matthias Punk Koenraad Schalm Stanford Innsbruck Leiden Foundations of quantum many body theory: 1. Ground states connected adiabatically to Metal Metal independent electron states carrying a current 2. Quasiparticle structure of excited states
Metals
SuperconductorMetal InsulatorMetal carrying E a current
k Superconductor Insulator E
k Foundations of quantum many body theory: 1. Ground states connected adiabatically to Metal Metal independent electron states carrying a current 2. Boltzmann-Landau theory of quasiparticles
Metals
SuperconductorMetal InsulatorMetal carrying E a current
k Superconductor Insulator E
k Modern phases of quantum matter: 1. Ground states disconnected from independent electron states: many-particle entanglement 2. Boltzmann-Landau theory of quasiparticles
Famous examples: The fractional quantum Hall effect of electrons in two dimensions (e.g. in graphene) in the presence of a strong magnetic field. The ground state is described by Laughlin’s wavefunction, and the excitations are quasiparticles which carry fractional charge. Modern phases of quantum matter: 1. Ground states disconnected from independent electron states: many-particle entanglement 2. Boltzmann-Landau theory of quasiparticles
Famous examples: Electrons in one dimensional wires form the Luttinger liquid. The quanta of density oscillations (“phonons”) are a quasiparticle basis of the low- energy Hilbert space. Similar comments apply to magnetic insulators in one dimension. Modern phases of quantum matter: 1. Ground states disconnected from independent electron states: many-particle entanglement 2. Quasiparticle2. No quasiparticlesstructure of excited states Modern phases of quantum matter: 1. Ground states disconnected from independent electron states: many-particle entanglement 2. Quasiparticle2. No quasiparticlesstructure of excited states
Only 2 examples:
1. Conformal field theories in spatial dimension d >1 ! 2. Quantum critical metals in dimension d=2 Iron pnictides: a new class of high temperature superconductors
Ishida, Nakai, and Hosono arXiv:0906.2045v1 Resistivity ⇢ + AT ↵ ⇠ 0 T BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 0 TSDW
Tc
α"
2.0
AF 1.0 +nematicSDW Superconductivity 0
S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, K. Hashimoto, K. Ikada, S. Tonegawa, R. Okazaki, H. Shishido, H. Ikeda, H. Takeya, K. Hirata, T. Terashima, and Y. Matsuda, Physical Review B 81, 184519 (2010) Resistivity ⇢ + AT ↵ ⇠ 0 T BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 0 TSDW
Tc
α" 2.0 Neel (AF) and “nematic” order
AF 1.0 +nematicSDW Superconductivity 0
S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, K. Hashimoto, K. Ikada, S. Tonegawa, R. Okazaki, H. Shishido, H. Ikeda, H. Takeya, K. Hirata, T. Terashima, and Y. Matsuda, Physical Review B 81, 184519 (2010) Resistivity ⇢ + AT ↵ ⇠ 0 T BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 0 TSDW
Tc
α"
2.0
AF 1.0 +nematicSDW Superconductivity 0 Superconductor S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi,Bose K. Hashimoto, condensate K. Ikada, S. Tonegawa, R.of Okazaki, pairs H. Shishido, of electrons H. Ikeda, H. Takeya, K. Hirata, T. Terashima, and Y. Matsuda, Physical Review B 81, 184519 (2010) Resistivity ⇢ + AT ↵ ⇠ 0 T BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 0 TSDW
Tc
α"
2.0
AF 1.0 +nematicSDW Superconductivity 0 Ordinary metal S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, K. Hashimoto, K. Ikada, S. Tonegawa, R. Okazaki, H. Shishido, H. Ikeda, H. Takeya, K. Hirata, T. Terashima, and Y. Matsuda,(Fermi liquid) Physical Review B 81, 184519 (2010) Resistivity ⇢ + AT ↵ ⇠ 0 T BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 0 TSDW
Tc
no quasiparticles, α" Landau-Boltzmann theory 2.0 does not apply
AF 1.0 +nematicSDW Superconductivity 0
S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, K. Hashimoto, K. Ikada, S. Tonegawa, R. Okazaki, H. Shishido, H. Ikeda, H. Takeya, K. Hirata, T. Terashima, and Y. Matsuda, Physical Review B 81, 184519 (2010) Resistivity ⇢ + AT ↵ ⇠ 0 T Strange BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 0 TSDW
Metal Tc
no quasiparticles, α" Landau-Boltzmann theory 2.0 does not apply
AF 1.0 +nematicSDW Superconductivity 0
S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, K. Hashimoto, K. Ikada, S. Tonegawa, R. Okazaki, H. Shishido, H. Ikeda, H. Takeya, K. Hirata, T. Terashima, and Y. Matsuda, Physical Review B 81, 184519 (2010) Outline
1. The simplest model without quasiparticles Superfluid-insulator transition of ultracold bosonic atoms in an optical lattice (Conformal field theories in 2+1 dimensions) !
2. Strange metals in the high Tc superconductors Non-quasiparticle transport at the Ising-nematic quantum critical point Outline
1. The simplest model without quasiparticles Superfluid-insulator transition of ultracold bosonic atoms in an optical lattice (Conformal field theories in 2+1 dimensions) !
2. Strange metals in the high Tc superconductors Non-quasiparticle transport at the Ising-nematic quantum critical point Superfluid-insulator transition
Ultracold 87Rb atoms - bosons
M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Nature 415, 39 (2002). T
Quantum critical
TKT =0 =0 h i6 h i Superfluid Insulator 0 g cc g a complex field representing the Bose-Einstein! condensate of the superfluid T
Quantum critical
TKT =0 =0 h i6 h i Superfluid Insulator 0 g cc g = d2rdt @ 2 c2 2 V ( ) S | t | |rr | Z 2 V ( )=( )⇥ 2 + u 2 ⇤ c | | | | T
Quantum critical
TKT =0 =0 h i6 h i Superfluid Insulator 0 g cc g LETTER RESEARCH
a The results for selected lattice depths V are shown in Fig. 2b. We 1 V j/j 1 0 c observe a gapped response with an asymmetric overall shape that will be analysed in the following paragraphs. Notably, the maximum observed temperature after modulation is well below the ‘melting’ 25 temperature for a Mott insulator in the atomic limit , Tmelt < 0.2U/kB (kB,Boltzmann’sconstant),demonstratingthatourexperimentsprobe the quantum gas in the degenerate regime. To obtain numerical values for the onset of spectral response, we fitted each spectrum with an error function centred at a frequency n0 (Fig. 2b, black lines). With j Nambu– approaching jc, the shift of the gap to lower frequencies is already Goldstone Higgs mode visible in the raw data (Fig. 2b) and becomes even more apparent for mode the fitted gap n0 as a function of j/jc (Fig. 2a, filled circles). The n0 values are in quantitative agreement with a prediction for the Higgs gap n at Im(Ψ ) SF commensurate filling (solid line): Re(Ψ ) LETTER RESEARCHLETTER RESEARCH 1=2 hn =U~ 3p2{4 1zj=j j=j {1 1=2 SF ðÞc ðÞc 2 j/jc * 1 a The results for selected lattice depths V0 are shown in Fig. 2b. We a 1 V Thej/j results Here 1 h fordenotes selected Planck’s latticeÂÃÀÁ constant. depthsffiffiffi ThisV0 are value shown is based in Fig. on an 2b. analysis We of 1 V j/j 1 c 7,16 c observe avariations gappedobserve response around a a gappedwith mean-field an response asymmetric state with(throughout overall an asymmetric shape the that manuscript, overall will shape that will be analysed in the following paragraphs. Notably, the maximumLETTER RESEARCH 2 2 2 2 be analysedwe have in rescaled the followingjc in the paragraphs. theoretical calculations Notably, the to match maximum the value 26 = d rdt @t c r V ( ) jc<0:06 obtainedobserved from temperature quantum Monte after modulation Carlo simulations is well). below the ‘melting’ S | | |r | observed temperature after modulation is well below the ‘melting’25 Z The sharpnesstemperature of the for spectral a Mott onset insulator can be in quantified25 the atomic by the limit width, Tmelt of < 0.2U/kB ⇥ 2 2 2 ⇤ temperature for a Mott insulator in the atomic limit , Tmelt < 0.2U/kB V ( )=( ) + u the fitted( errorkB,Boltzmann’sconstant),demonstratingthatourexperimentsprobe function, which is shown as vertical dashed lines in a c (k ,Boltzmann’sconstant),demonstratingthatourexperimentsprobeThe results for selected lattice depths V0 are shown in Fig. 2b. We 1 | | | | V B j/j Fig. 1 2a. Approachingthe quantum the gas critical in the degenerate point, the regime. spectral To onset obtain becomes numerical values T the quantumc gas in the degenerate regime. To obtain numerical values sharper, andforobserve the the width onset of normalized a spectral gapped response, to response the centre we fitted frequency with each an spectrumn0 asymmetricremains with an error overall shape that will 3 j/jc ,for 1 the onset of spectral response, we fitted each spectrum with an error constant (Supplementaryfunctionbe analysed centred Fig. at 3). in a The frequency the constancy followingn0 of(Fig. this ratio 2b, paragraphs. black indicates lines). Notably, With j the maximum Particles and holes correspond function centred at a frequency n (Fig. 2b, black lines). With j Nambu– that the widthapproaching of the spectraljc, the0 shift onset of scales the gap with to the lower distance frequencies to the is already to the 2 normal modes in the observed temperature after modulation is well below the ‘melting’ Nambu– QuantumGoldstone approachingHiggs modecriticaljc, point thevisible shift in the in of the same the raw way gap data as to the (Fig. lower gap 2b) frequency. frequencies and becomes is even already more apparent for oscillation of about = 0. mode 25 Goldstone Higgs mode visible in theWe raw observethe datatemperature fitted similar (Fig. gap 2b) gappedn0 andas a becomes responsesfor function a Mott of even inj/ thejc insulator more(Fig. Mott 2a, apparent insulating filled in circles). the for regime atomic The n0 values limit , Tmelt < 0.2U/kB mode critical the fitted(Supplementary gap n0 asare a function in quantitative Information of j/jc (Fig. agreement and 2a, Fig. filled 5a), with circles). with a prediction the The gapn0 closing forvalues the con- Higgs gap nSF at Im(Ψ ) (kB,Boltzmann’sconstant),demonstratingthatourexperimentsprobe Re( ) are in quantitativetinuouslycommensurate when agreement approaching with filling a prediction the (solid critical line): for point the (Fig. Higgs 2a, gap opennSF circles).at TKT Ψ Im(Ψ ) b commensurateWe interpret fillingthe this (solid as quantum a line): result of combined gas in the particle degenerate and hole excitations regime. To obtain numerical values Re(Ψ Lattice ) loading Modulation Hold time Ramp to Temperature p 1=2 1=2 atomic measurement with a frequencyfor the givenh onsetnSF by=U the~ of Mott spectral3 excitation2{4 response,1z gapj=jc that closes wej=jc fitted{ at1 the each spectrum with an error 20=0 2 =0 j/j * 1 1=2 ðÞ1=2 ðÞ limit ctransitionhnSF=UHere point~ h163denotes.p The2{ fitted4 Planck’s1z gapsj=jc are constant. consistentj=jc This{1 with value the is Mott based gap on an analysis of h i6 h i function centredðÞÂÃÀÁffiffiffi atðÞ a frequency n0 (Fig. 2b, black lines). With j 2 Insulator j/jc * 1 7,16 Superfluid Here h denotes Planck’svariations constant. around This a mean-field value is based state1=2 on an(throughout analysis1=2 of the manuscript, ) ÂÃÀÁffiffiffi p r hn =U~ 1z 12 2{17 j=j 1{j=j Nambu– approachingMI 7,16jc, the shiftc of thec gap to lower frequencies is already 0 E 15 variations aroundwe a mean-field have rescaled statejc in the(throughout theoreticalðÞ the calculations manuscript, to match the value Goldstone T = 200 ms j 0:06 obtained from quantum Monte Carlo simulations16 26). tot Higgswe have modewhere rescalednMIjcis