Prefeasibility Study Mayaniquel Project Guatemala

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prefeasibility Study Mayaniquel Project Guatemala CANADIAN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT PREFEASIBILITY STUDY MAYANIQUEL PROJECT GUATEMALA EFFECTIVE DATE: October 24, 2012 DATE OF REPORT: December 7, 2012 QUALIFIED PERSONS: Neil B. Prenn, PE Robert Sim, PGeo Bruce M. Davis, PhD Nicholas A. Barcza, PhD, Pr Eng _________________________________________________________________________ Prepared by: Prepared for: MTB Project Management Professionals, Inc. 8301 E. Prentice Avenue, Suite 312 Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 P: 303.741.9633 F: 303.741.9636 Table of Contents 1.0 Summary ............................................................................................ 15 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................15 1.2 Project Location, Accessibility and Climate .................................................................15 1.3 Property Ownership ....................................................................................................15 1.4 Property Description ...................................................................................................16 1.5 Geology and Mineralization .........................................................................................18 1.6 Drilling .........................................................................................................................20 1.7 Mineral Resource ........................................................................................................21 1.8 Mining .........................................................................................................................23 1.9 Mineral Reserve Estimate ...........................................................................................24 1.10 Metallurgical Testwork ................................................................................................25 1.10.1 Prior Testwork ......................................................................................................25 1.10.2 Ore Upgrading Pilot Testwork ..............................................................................25 1.10.3 Smelter Pilot Testwork .........................................................................................26 1.11 Process Design and Recovery ....................................................................................26 1.12 Execution Plan and Schedule .....................................................................................27 1.13 Capital Cost ................................................................................................................28 1.14 Operating Cost ............................................................................................................28 1.15 Marketing Studies .......................................................................................................29 1.16 Economic Evaluation ..................................................................................................29 1.17 Conclusions and Recommendations ...........................................................................30 1.17.1 Conclusions .........................................................................................................30 1.17.2 Recommendations ...............................................................................................31 1.18 Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Statements .................31 2.0 Introduction ......................................................................................... 34 2.1 Purpose of the Technical Report .................................................................................34 2.2 Sources of Information ................................................................................................34 2.3 Personal Inspections of the Mayaniquel Project ..........................................................35 2.4 Currency Assumptions ................................................................................................35 3.0 Reliance on Other Experts .................................................................. 36 4.0 Property Description and Location ...................................................... 37 MTB Project Management Professionals, Inc. 2 4.1 Property Ownership and Agreements .........................................................................37 4.2 Environmental Liabilities and Permitting ......................................................................39 4.2.1 Environmental and Permitting Requirements .......................................................39 4.2.2 Environmental Baseline .......................................................................................40 4.2.3 Reclamation Activities ..........................................................................................40 4.3 Other Significant Factors and Risks Affecting Access or Title .....................................41 4.4 Royalties .....................................................................................................................41 5.0 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure & Physiography ................................................................................................................. 42 5.1 Location and Access ...................................................................................................42 5.2 Physiography ..............................................................................................................42 5.3 Climate .......................................................................................................................42 5.4 Local Resources .........................................................................................................42 5.5 Infrastructure ...............................................................................................................43 6.0 History ................................................................................................ 44 6.1 Regional Exploration ...................................................................................................44 6.2 Project Area Exploration .............................................................................................44 7.0 Geological Setting and Mineralization ................................................. 46 7.1 Regional Geology .......................................................................................................46 7.2 Local and Property Geology ........................................................................................46 7.3 Mineralization ..............................................................................................................50 8.0 Deposit Types ..................................................................................... 51 9.0 Exploration .......................................................................................... 53 9.1 Historical Exploration ..................................................................................................53 9.2 Exploration by Anfield Nickel Corp. .............................................................................53 10.0 Drilling ............................................................................................... 54 11.0 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security ..................................... 57 11.1 Sampling Method and Approach .................................................................................57 11.2 Sample Preparation ....................................................................................................59 11.3 Chemical Analysis.......................................................................................................60 11.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control ..............................................................................60 11.5 Sample Security ..........................................................................................................61 MTB Project Management Professionals, Inc. 3 12.0 Data Verification ............................................................................... 63 13.0 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing ................................... 64 13.1 Background.................................................................................................................64 13.2 Ore Upgrading Pilot Testwork .....................................................................................65 13.2.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................65 13.2.2 Pilot Scale Testing ...............................................................................................66 13.3 Smelter Pilot Testwork ................................................................................................68 13.3.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................68 13.3.2 Objectives of the Testwork Campaign ..................................................................68 13.3.3 Ore Sample Selection and Preparation at the Mine..............................................69 13.3.4 Ore Sample, Sampling, Analysis, and Homogenization at Morro Azul .................69 13.3.5 Feed Processing ..................................................................................................70 13.3.6 Smelting Operating Philosophy
Recommended publications
  • Isheries Surney
    ISHERIES SURNEY JUAGULTURE WED AQUACULTURES WON 0 0 0 0 LAKE IZABAL FISHERIES SURVEY INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AQUACULTURE DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND ALLIED AQUACULTURES AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION AUBURN UNIVERSITY AUBURN, ALABAMA 36830 Project: AID/cs'd-2-780 Date: September 5, 1973 LAKE JZABAL FISHERIES SURVEY by W.D. Davies Auburn University Auburn, Alabama 36830 Project: AID/csd-2780 Date of Survey: June 11 - 22, 1973 Date: September 5, 1973 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 ITINERARY .............................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................... 2 2.1 Guatemalan Geography and Population ............... 3 2.2 Fish Marketing and Consumption .................... 4 2.3 Government Division Responsible for Fisheries 6 2.4 Lake Izabal, El Golfete and the Rio Dulce Water Resources. ...................................... 7 3.0 THE FISHERIES ........................................... 8 3.1 Lake and River Fisheries ........................... 8 3.2 Fishing Regulations ................................ 10 3.3 Assessment of the Fishery .......................... 10 4.0 RECREATIONAL USE OF LAKE IZABAL, RIO DULCE AND EL GOLFETE......................................... 11 5.0 SUMMARY OF SURVEY AND PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS .. 12 5.1 Summary ....................... ................... 12 5.2 Recommended Scope of Work ........................ 13 5.3 Program Requirements .............................. 15 6.0 CONFERENCES ............................................ 17 7.0 LITERATURE CITED .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Report on Guatemala
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT ON GUATEMALA PREPARED BY THE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DIVISION, LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. AID/DS/ST CONTRACT NO. SA/TOA 1-77 WITH U.S. MAN AND THE BIOSPHERE SECRETARIAT DEPARTMENT OF STATE WASHINGTON, D.C. MAY 1979 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT ON GUATEMALA Table of Contents Section page 0.0 Introduction and summary 1.0 Population characteristics 1.1 General population statistics 1 1.2 Ethnic composition of population 3 1.3 Educational characteristics of population 4 1.4 Health characteristics of population 5 1.5 Population control 6 1.6 Water supply and sanitation 7 2.0 Organizations with interest in environment and natural resources 2.1 Government agencies 9 2.2 Non-governmental organizations 17 2.3 International organizations 19 2.4 International cooperation 20 2.5 Educational, research and training capabilities 20 2.6 Monitoring capabilities 21 2.7 Statistical capabilities 22 3.0 Legislation dealing with environment and natural resources 3.1 Renewable resources 3.1.1 Water resources 24 3.1.2 Forests 26 3.1.3 Wildlife and hunting 27 3.1.4 Fisheries 29 3.1.5 Air and the atmosphere 30 3.1.6 Proposed pollution control legislation 30 3.2 Non-renewable resources 3.2.1 Mineral resources 31 3.2.2 Soil 33 3.2.3 Coasts and beaches 33 3.3 Land use and agriculture 3.2.1 Land use 33 3.2.1 Land ownership and reform 33 3.4 Pesticides control 34 4.0 Resources 4.1 Water resources 4.1.1 Rainfall and climate 35 4.1.2 Rivers 37 4.1.3 Lakes 39 4.1.4 Groundwater 41 4.2 Forests 42 4.3 Soil 51 4.4 Wildlife 54 4.5 Coasts,
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    VANCOUVER SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY GUARDIANS OF THE BLUE-GREEN PLATE, THE BLUE GREEN BOWL: WHAT THE WORLD CAN LEARN FROM THE MAYA-SIPAKAPENSE OF GUATEMALA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF THEOLOGY by THE REVEREND EMILIE TERI SMITH VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA April 2009 The Reverend Dr. Martin Brokenleg The Reverend Dr. Paula Sampson Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57327-3 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57327-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, pr§ter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Petén, Guatemala by Markus Zander and Jochen Dürr
    Dynamics in land tenure, local power and the peasant economy: the case of Petén, Guatemala by Markus Zander and Jochen Dürr Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing 6-8 April 2011 Organised by the Land Deals Politics Initiative (LDPI) in collaboration with the Journal of Peasant Studies and hosted by the Future Agricultures Consortium at the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex Draft Version Dynamics in land tenure, local power and the peasant economy: the case of Petén, Guatemala Markus Zander, Jochen Dürr Abstract This article analyses the ongoing process of land grabbing by cattle farmers and drug traffickers in south-eastern Petén, Guatemala and its socio-economic consequences. In the last decade, this process has strongly accelerated due to several factors, which made investment in land more attractive and resulted in sharply increasing land prices. In the 236 communities included in the field study, 30% of all peasant families have already sold their land, some of them hoping to escape poverty, others under often violent pressure from buyers mostly related to the drug trade, who are securing control over large territories. For lack of economic alternatives the landless families end up leasing plots for cultivation from their neighbours, working as day labourers on big cattle ranches or occupying land in the protected areas in northern Petén, with poverty and conflicts about resources on a steady rise. Value chain analysis shows that the conversion from small scale peasant agriculture to extensive livestock production reduces land productivity and diminishes local added value and employment, thus providing further arguments for changes in agricultural politics to halt or reverse the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Impact on the Development of Pre-Classic Maya Civilisation
    Clim. Past, 14, 1253–1273, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1253-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Climate impact on the development of Pre-Classic Maya civilisation Kees Nooren1, Wim Z. Hoek1, Brian J. Dermody1,2, Didier Galop3, Sarah Metcalfe4, Gerald Islebe5, and Hans Middelkoop1 1Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands 2Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands 3Université Jean Jaurès, CNRS, UMR 5602 GEODE, 31058 Toulouse, France 4School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK 5El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Chetumal Herbario, Chetumal, AP 424 Quintana Roo, Mexico Correspondence: Kees Nooren ([email protected]) Received: 23 February 2018 – Discussion started: 6 March 2018 Revised: 20 June 2018 – Accepted: 25 July 2018 – Published: 20 August 2018 Abstract. The impact of climate change on the develop- 1 Introduction ment and disintegration of Maya civilisation has long been debated. The lack of agreement among existing palaeocli- During the last decades, a wealth of new data has been gath- matic records from the region has prevented a detailed un- ered to understand human–environmental interaction and the derstanding of regional-scale climatic variability, its climatic role of climate change in the development and disintegra- forcing mechanisms and its impact on the ancient Maya. We tion of societies in the Maya lowlands (e.g. Akers et al., present two new palaeo-precipitation records for the central 2016; Douglas et al., 2015, 2016; Dunning et al., 2012, 2015; Maya lowlands, spanning the Pre-Classic period (1800 BCE– Lentz et al., 2014; Turner and Sabloff, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Mexican and Guatemalan Landscapes
    new EUROPAMUNDO TOURS EUROPAMUNDO Inicio Ruta 1 Nº noches pernocta No se pernocta FROM $990-DAYS 11/16 DEPARTURE DATES Apr.18 : 06 May.18 : 04 Jun.18 : 01 Jul.18 : 13 Guatemala Aug.18 : 10 Sep.18 : 07 Oct.18 : 05 option 1 Nov.18 : 02 Dec.18 : 14 MEXICAN AND GUATEMALAN Jan.19 : 11 Feb.19 : 08 Mar.19 : 08 LANDSCAPES option 2 PRICE PER PERSON HISTORY AND TRADITION: OPTION 1 OPTION 2 ID: 15323 ID: 15511 MEXICO AND GUATEMALA DBL INDIV DBL INDIV High S. $ 1000 1290 2095 2775 01 FRI. Mexico DF.- 04 MON. Oaxaca- Monte Albán- Oaxaca.- Mid S. $ 995 1285 2090 2770 Arrival. Welcome to Mexico. Transfer to hotel and free Visit included to OAXACA, a UNESCO World Heritage City time. Our guide will contact you late in the afternoon or of Aztec origin with its impressive monumental heritage, after Low S. $ 990 1280 2085 2765 provide information through the informative panels in the which we go up to the site of MONTE ALBAN, which is set hotel reception area.- deep in a 400-metre mountain above the Valley of Oaxaca entry tickets and visit are included. This is the most 02 SAT. Mexico City. magnificent of the Zapotec cities. Free afternoon in Oaxaca, EXPECTED HOTELES Today we have a fantastic day acquaint ourselves an extremely beautiful colonial city which is full of life. with Mexico. We include a sightseeing tour of the Print your final list of hotels in your “My trip” city. We will visit the Plaza of Three Cultures, and the 05 TUE.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala Seeks Solutions to Extensive Environmental Degradation LADB Staff
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiCen Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 8-15-1996 Guatemala Seeks Solutions to Extensive Environmental Degradation LADB Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen Recommended Citation LADB Staff. "Guatemala Seeks Solutions to Extensive Environmental Degradation." (1996). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ noticen/8139 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiCen by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 55570 ISSN: 1089-1560 Guatemala Seeks Solutions to Extensive Environmental Degradation by LADB Staff Category/Department: Guatemala Published: 1996-08-15 Growing civic awareness of environmental degradation in Guatemala has led to increased public pressure on the government to protect the country's natural resources. In recent months, debate has centered on the extensive deterioration of Lake Amatitlan, the nation's fourth largest fresh- water lake and the capital's only long-term reservoir. Debate is also intensifying over rampant deforestation around the country as well as the alarming level of air and water pollution in the capital and other urban areas. In recent years, domestic and international pressure to protect the environment has grown immensely in all the Central American countries, which led to the creation of the Central American Sustainable Development Alliance (Alianza para el Desarrollo Sostenible, ALIDES) in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Livingston, Guatemala
    Building a Network for Guatemalan Replenishment Zones In March 2013, the Leadership Learning Community was hired by the MAR Leadership Program (MAR-L) to evaluate their program. The evaluation team conducted site visits to spend time with fellows and the people who work with them daily to learn firsthand about the challenges, achievements and impact of their conservation projects. Name of Fellows: Ana Giro Petersen Blanca Rosa García Hernández City, Country: Livingston, Guatemala MAR -L Cohort Year: 201 1 Project: Declaration of the first three fully protected “no-take” zones or replenishment zones in: La Graciosa, Punta Gruesa, and La Laguna Santa Isabel, Guatemala. Key wins: In the declaration of the first three fully protected no-take zones or replenishment zones in: La Graciosa, Punta Gruesa, and La Laguna Santa Isabel. Reached an agreement around the boundaries and legal foundations of replenishment zones among key Guatemalan stakeholders, including Fishing Groups, the National Protected Areas Council (CONAP) Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food (MAGA) through the office of Regulations of Fisheries and Aquaculture (DIPESCA), and The Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MARN). Page | 1 I. Chapter 1: The Story of Place Only accessible by boat, travel to Livingston, Guatemala, is about 30 minutes from Puerto Barrios along the Amatique Bay. The town sits at the mouth of the Rio Dulce River at the Port of Honduras. The boundaries of Amatique Bay are mostly in Guatemala while the northeastern portion is shared with Belize. The dark blue green water contrasts with the lush green landscape along the Caribbean Guatemalan coastline. The jungle vegetation covers the hillsides along the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • And That There Are 6 Wells Used for the Water Supply, and Some Other Private Wells
    2.3 Hazard mapping and that there are 6 wells used for the water supply, and some other private wells. The municipal wells were visited and the locations confirmed with GPS. EMPRESO, the Civil Engineering Department of Puerto Santo Tomas, informed us of the construction boring details of the dock and helped us confirm geographic features and conditions in the aerial photos, as well as providing us with a detail map of Santo Tomas. They also informed us of the July 11, 1999 earthquake that caused damages to the dock foundation and damaged the customs building so badly that it is unsafe to use. Several neighborhoods were visited to investigate local conditions, and a large spring (Pozo Azul) was visited to confirm the location with GPS and observe the water level. The port authority of Puerto Barrios, COBIGUA, was visited and they informed us about some damages from the 1999 earthquake. The area of La Refinería was investigated and people interviewed told us about the flooding problems in this area. 6) Tacana volcano We left San Marcos early in the morning of July 11, 2002 and, from the mountain pass in the east of Sibinal (about 3,500 meters in altitude), the highest peaks in Central America, i.e., Tajumulco and Tacaná Volcanoes. To confirm the topographic and geological features near the Tacaná volcano, we went down to Sibinal, checked with the local police chief about the access, and climbed via Haciendita to the Tacaná volcano. Along the road, we found collapses of weathered granite. We went down from Haciendita to Vega del Volcán and confirmed that thick layers of tephra were on the lava flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala a Country Profile
    PN -/Hif<.- 31 ~ Guatemala A Country Profile. June 1981 Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance Agency for International Development Washington. D.C. 20523 Guatemala " .2 90 i ( ~ ----- • t 18 f ~ " f 1 \ J; I ( " Belize ~~"I- City • \ ." MEXICO . Tikal ~, L';j< P Pel "'Itza ,. ... Belize (U.K.) Comitin San A onia Gulf of Honduras PUnla Gorda ~io SSf$(tln CaU n ( . HuehuetenaniO r-....---,,·-.·i?,o en _'~<o~y_~ • " PA CIFIC OCEAN San Salv-.t6r Zacaleco\tlca o '25 50 100 MIles ~I----,'--~' ~'-----r~' --~'~~~-------' o 25 so 100 K,lornll'lOrS 90 I 5024731·78 (5<11403) lAmberl ConlOfmat Prolechon ---- Railroad 5Iand.rd_pa~llels 9-20' and 14 ·'0' Seele 1.2 ,800,000 Rood --,..,-_.LIjBoufld'"'l" __"''''''' ... +- Airpor1 GUATEMALA: A COUNTRY PROFILE prepared for The Office of U. S. Foreign Disaster Assistance Bureau for Private and Development Cooperation • Agency for International Development Department of State Washington, D. C. 20523 • by Evaluation Technologies, Inc. Arlington, Virginia under contract AID/SOD/PDC-C-0283 The profile on Guatemala Is one In a series designed to provide baseline country data In support of the planning and relief operations of the Office of U. S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA). The content, scope, and sources have evolved over the course of the last three years, and no doubt will continue to do so. The relatively narrow focus is intentional. To avoid r.edundancy, some topics one might expect to find in a "country prof II e" are not covered here. If the information provided'can also be useful to others in the disaster assistance and development communities, so much the better.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Abundance and Community Composition in Native and Non-Native Littoral Aquatic Plants at Lake Izabal, Guatemala
    FISH ABUNDANCE AND COMMUNITY COMPOSITION IN NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE LITTORAL AQUATIC PLANTS AT LAKE IZABAL, GUATEMALA By CHRISTIAN ALBERTO BARRIENTOS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Christian Alberto Barrientos To God, who provides all wisdom and judgment. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I first thank my advisor, Dr. Mike Allen, for his guidance and willingness to do research in Guatemala. I also thank my committee members, Dr. William Haller and Dr. Daniel Canfield. I really appreciate Patrick Cooney and Maritza Aguirre’s help and support on this project, in the field and by email. Special thanks go to Dr. Mark Brenner who, on one of his research trips to Petén, encouraged me to pursue a higher education level.. Thanks also go to my parents, Jorge and Alicia Barrientos, who provided logistical and moral support. Most importantly, my parents were always there for me. Partial funding for this research was provided by the Wildlife Conservation Society, Mesoamerican Program, especially thanks to Archie Carr III. Funding was also provided by the Fulbright Scholarship and the University of Florida. Last, but not least, I thank my wife Corina and my two daughters Ana Isabel and Ana Cris, who came with me from Guatemala to Gainesville, Florida. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EVALUATION of the COASTAL and MARINE RESOURCES of the ATLANTIC COAST of GUATEMALA CEP Technical Report No
    CEP Technical Report: 34 1995 EVALUATION OF THE COASTAL AND MARINE RESOURCES OF THE ATLANTIC COAST OF GUATEMALA CEP Technical Report No. 34 Note: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. The document contains the views expressed by the authors acting in their individual capacity and may not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP. For bibliographic purposes this document may be cited as: Yañez-Arancibia, Alejandro, Zárate Lomelí, David, and Terán Cuevas, Angel. 1994. EPOMEX. CEP Technical Report No. 34. UNEP Caribbean Environment Programme, Kingston, Jamaica. 64 pp. ii Caribbean Environment Programme United Nations Environment Programme EVALUATION OF THE COASTAL AND MARINE RESOURCES OF THE ATLANTIC COAST OF GUATEMALA Alejandro Yañez-Arancibia David Zárate Lomelí Angel Terán Cuevas Prepared in cooperation with: Program of Ecology, Fisheries and Oceanography Of the Gulf of Mexico CEP Technical Report No. 34 1995 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document could not have been written without the assistance of Rodolfo Godínez Orantes, INGUAT; Mamerto Gomez Cruz of the Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala; Antonio Salaverría Reyes and Marco Vinicio Cerezo of FUNDAECO, Ana Báez of Turismo y Conservación Consultores, and Emma Diaz of CONAP. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Background 1 II. Objectives 1 III. Methodology 2 IV. Analysis 3 V. Environmental Analysis 22 VI. Definition of Management Guidelines 37 VII. Sectorial Level 42 VIII.
    [Show full text]