DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 47/Wednesday, March 11, 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 47/Wednesday, March 11, 1998 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 47 / Wednesday, March 11, 1998 / Notices 11875 Park Place area in Scranton, and not for emergency preparedness, and building 8. The SEIS is tentatively scheduled the Plot and Green Ridge areas within relocation. to be available for public review in Scranton. In 1996 the Corps of 5. The decision to implement these August 1998. Engineers was directed by the 1996 actions will be based on an evaluation James F. Johnson, Water Resources Development Act to of the probable impact of the proposed Chief, Planning Division. carry out flood control for the Plot and activities on the public interest. That [FR Doc. 98±6207 Filed 3±10±98; 8:45 am] Green Ridge areas. Therefore, the U.S. decision will reflect the national BILLING CODE 3710±41±M Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore concern for both protection and District, is now preparing a utilization of important resources. The Supplemental Environmental Impact DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Statement (SEIS) for the Plot and Green benefit that may be expected to accrue from the proposal will be balanced Ridge Flood Protection Projects. Department of the Army, Corps of against its reasonable foreseeable 2. Specific authorization for the Plot Engineers and Green Ridge Flood Protection impacts. The Baltimore District is Projects are from Section 342 of the preparing an SEIS that will describe the Intent to Prepare an Environmental Water Resources Act of 1996 which impacts of the proposed projects on Impact Statement (EIS) for the San directs the Corps of Engineers environmental and cultural resources in Diego Harbor Navigation Improvement ``* * * to carry out the project for flood the study area and the overall public Study, San Diego County, California control for the Plot and Green Ridge interest. The SEIS will be in accordance sections of the [Lackawanna] project.'' with NEPA and will document all AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 3. The Plot and Green Ridge Flood factors that may be relevant to the DoD. Protection study areas are located in proposal, including the cumulative ACTION: Notice of Intent. northeastern Pennsylvania in the city of effects thereof. Among these factors are SUMMARY: The Los Angeles District Scranton. They encompass an estimated resource conservation, socio-economics intends to prepare an EIS to support the area of 400 acres adjacent to the considerations, economic benefits, proposed navigation improvement study Lackawanna River and extend for a aesthetics, general environmental at San Diego Harbor, California. The distance of approximately 21¤2 miles. concerns, wetlands, cultural concerns, The Green Ridge area is located on the purpose of the proposal is to identify fish and wildlife concerns, flood measures that will improve navigation left descending bank of the river, hazards, floodplain values, land use, directly across the river from Albright in San Diego Harbor from the 10th recreation, water supply, water quality, Avenue Marine Terminal to the Avenue, and the Plot area is located on project implementation costs, energy the right descending bank, immediately Coronado Bay Bridge. Alternative needs, safety, and the general needs and measures include harbor deepening by upstream of the Green Ridge area. The welfare of the people. If applicable, the upstream limit of the Plot area extends dredging to approximately ´45.0 feet SEIS will also apply guidelines issued Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) at the to approximately the confluence of the by the Environmental Protection Lackawanna River and Leggetts Creek. 10th Avenue terminal, as well as a no Agency, under the authority of Section The downstream limit of the proposed action alternative. The EIS will analyze 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act of 1977 Green Ridge area will be the potential impacts on the environmental (Public Law 95±217). Lackawanna tributary of Meadow Brook. range of alternatives, including the 4. The investigation of local flood 6. The public involvement program recommended plan. protection projects for the Plot and will include workshops, meetings, and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Green Ridge areas is in response to other coordination with interested For further information contact Ms. problems and opportunities associated private individuals and organizations, Stephanie Hall, Project Environmental with the Federal objectives and specific as well as with concerned Federal, state, Coordinator, (213) 452±3862, or Mr. state and local concerns. Federally, the and local agencies. Coordination letters Joseph Johnson, Study Manager, (213) investigation is based on the objective to have been sent to appropriate agencies, 452±3831. contribute to the national economic organizations, and individuals on an SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Army development while protecting the extensive mailing list. Additional public Corps of Engineers intends to prepare nation's environment pursuant to the information will be provided through and EIS to assess the environmental national environmental statutes, print media, mailings, and radio and effects associated with the proposed applicable executive orders, and other television announcements. navigation improvement measures at Federal planning requirements. San Diego Harbor, from the 10th Avenue 7. In addition to the Corps, other Considerations are also given to the Marine Terminal to the Coronado Bay participants who will be involved in the benefits of the plan and expenditures Bridge. The public will have the necessary to construct and maintain the study and SEIS process include, but are opportunity to comment on this analysis plan. The plan must be engineeringly not limited to, the following: U.S. before any action is taken to implement and institutionally implementable and Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. the proposed action. consistent with certain environmental Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Forest statutes and Executive Orders. The Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Scoping desires of the non-Federal sponsors for National Resource Conservation Service; a. The Army Corps of Engineers will a particular project are additional U.S. National Park Service, conduct a scoping meeting prior to criteria for plan development and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania preparing the Environmental Impact evaluation. Specific solutions that will Department of Environmental Statement to aid in the determination of be evaluated with these criteria include Protection, and the City of Scranton, significant environmental issues both structural and non-structural Pennsylvania. The Baltimore District associated with the proposed action. solutions such as levees and floodwalls, invites potentially affected Federal, The public, as well as Federal, State, channel dredging and enlargements, state, and local agencies, and other and local agencies, are encouraged to channel improvements, modifications to organizations and entities to participate participate in the scoping process by buildings, roads, and structures, flood in this study. submitting data, information, and 11876 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 47 / Wednesday, March 11, 1998 / Notices comments identifying relevant Study and Environmental Impact proposed actions, including the environmental and socioeconomic Statement. The study proposes solutions cumulative effects thereof, are being issues to be addressed in the to several interrelated water resources considered; among these factors are environmental analysis. Useful problems in Ocean City, Maryland. The economics, aesthetics, general information includes other study area includes Ocean City and environmental concerns, wetlands, environmental studies, published and Assateague Island, adjacent coastal bays cultural values, flood hazards, fish and unpublished data, alternatives that and nearshore waters of the Atlantic wildlife values, flood plain values, land could be addressed in the analysis, and Ocean, and Maryland mainland areas use, recreation, water supply and potential mitigation measures associated within the coastal watershed boundary. conservation, water quality, energy with the proposed action. The Feasibility Study includes four needs, safety, food and fiber production, b. A public scoping meeting will be separate components, which present and the general needs and welfare of the held in the City of San Diego on March solutions for four different water-related people. 18, 1998, concurrent with a public problems in the Maryland coastal bay 2. The four components of the study workshop. The location and time of the area. The components include (a) the include the following: public scoping meeting will be short-term restoration of the northern (a) The short-term restoration plan for announced in the local news media. A end of Assateague Island, (b) long-term the northern end of Assateague Island separate notice of this meeting will be sand management for Assateague Island was developed because of the sent to all parties on the study mailing and Ocean City, (c) navigation endangered condition of the island. The list. improvements to the Ocean City harbor sediment-starved condition of c. Individuals and agencies may offer and inlet, and (d) restoration of Assateague Island was partially caused information or data relevant to the terrestrial and aquatic habitat. A Draft by construction of the Ocean City inlet environmental or socioeconomic Integrated Interim Report and jetties, which disrupted the sediment impacts by attending the public scoping Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) flow between Ocean City and meeting. Comments, suggestions, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leggets Creek Habitat Enhancement
    Cheryl Nolan 2017 COLDWATER Watershed Specialist Lackawanna County Conservation District HERITAGE PARTNERSHIP IMPLEMENTATION GRANT Leggetts Creek Habitat Enhancement and Streambank Stabilization Project Coldwater Heritage Partnership Grant Final Report January 9, 2018 Table of Contents I. Project summary ............................................................................................................................................ 2 II. Project Outcomes...................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Were all project objectives met? .......................................................................................................... 3 B. If not, which ones and why not? .......................................................................................................... 3 C. Is project considered complete? If not, what remains to be accomplished? .................................... 3 III. Project Sustainability................................................................................................................................. 6 A. Discuss the long term sustainability of the project as implemented. What are potential threats to sustainability? ................................................................................................................................................ 6 B. Monitoring, operation and maintenance plans. .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marcellus Cover.Indd
    The Science beneath the Surface A Very Short Guide to the Marcellus Shale Don Duggan-Haas, Robert M. Ross, and Warren D. Allmon The Science beneath the Surface: A Very Short Guide to the Marcellus Shale by Don Duggan-Haas, Robert M. Ross, and Warren D. Allmon with contributions by Kelly E. Cronin, Trisha A. Smrecak, and Sara Auer Perry Paleontological Research Institution 2013 ISBN 978-0-87710-502-2 Paleontological Research Institution Special Publication No. 43 © 2013 Paleontological Research Institution 1259 Trumansburg Road Ithaca, New York 14850 U.S.A. http://www.museumoftheearth.org Design and layout by Paula M. Mikkelsen. Th is book is printed on paper certifi ed by the Forest Stewardship Council, https://us.fsc.org/. Cite this book as: Duggan-Haas, D., R. M. Ross, and W. D. Allmon, with K. E. Cronin, T. A. Smrecak, and S. Auer Perry. 2013. Th e Science Beneath the Surface: A Very Short Guide to the Marcellus Shale. Paleontological Research Institution (Special Publication 43), Ithaca, New York, 252 pp. On the cover: Outcrop of the Marcellus Shale at its “type locality” (the fi rst place that it was described in scientifi c literature, and for which it is named) in Marcellus, New York. Photo by Ben Aronson, courtesy of Linda Ivany. Table of Contents Preface and Acknowledgments . iii Introduction . .1 Chapter 1. Geology of the Marcellus Shale . 5 Chapter 2. Why the Geology Matters . 19 Chapter 3. Th e Technology of Shale Gas Extraction . 33 Chapter 4. Water and Marcellus Shale Development . 63 Chapter 5. Beyond Water: Other Environmental Impacts of Marcellus Gas Development .
    [Show full text]
  • Download Proposed Regulation
    REVISED 12/16 INDEØTg%ORV Regulatory Analysis Form (Completed by PromulgatingAgency) Wfl[: >ic (All Comments submitted on this regulation will appear on IRRC’s website) Mt. — 4 (1) Agency I Environmental Protection Thdepenqp Rf&uIt -Ui, Review r,.qu; (2) Agency Number: 7 Identification Number: 548 IRRC Number: (3) PA Code Cite: 25 Pa. Code Chapter 93 (4) Short Title: Water Quality Standards — Class A Stream Redesignations (5) Agency Contacts (List Telephone Number and Email Address): Primary Contact: Laura Edinger; 717.783.8727; ledingerpa.gov Secondary Contact: Jessica Shirley; 717.783.8727; jesshirleypa.gov (6) Type of Rulemaking (check applicable box): Proposed Regulation El Emergency Certification Regulation El Final Regulation El Certification by the Governor El Final Omitted Regulation El Certification by the Attorney General (7) Briefly explain the regulation in clear and nontechnical language. (100 words or less) The amendments to Chapter 93 reflect the list of recommended redesignations of streams as embedded in the attached Water Quality Standards Review Stream Redesignation Evaluation Report. The proposed regulation will update and revise stream use designations in 25 Pa. Code § 93.9d, 93.9f, 93.9j, 93.9k, 93.91, 93.9m, 93.9p, 93.9q, 93.9r, and 93.9t. These changes will not impose any new operating requirements on existing wastewater discharges or other existing activities regulated by the Department under existing permits or approvals. If a new, increased or additional discharge is proposed by a permit applicant, more stringent treatment requirements and enhanced best management practices (BMPs) may be necessary to maintain and protect the existing quality of those waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Lackawanna River Citizens
    Lackawanna River Citizens Water Quality Handbook Lackawanna River Citizens Water Quality Handbook Written by Arthur Popp Bernard McGurl Edited by Jack Coyle A publication of the Lackawanna River Corridor Association P.O. Box 368 Scranton, PA 18501 For additional information please contact the LRCA at (570) 347-6311 or email us at [email protected]. Visit our website at www.lrca.org. © 1998 Revised December 2004 Revised March 2008 INTRODUCTION Intended for residents of the Lackawanna River watershed; this Lackawanna River Citizens Water Quality Handbook provides information on protecting water quality of the Lackawanna River and tributaries. The first section describes pollutants found in the River and explains how they get there. The Handbook illustrates what concerned citizens can do to prevent pollution and protect water quality. Best Management Practices (BMP) describes practices we can use to control pollution in our homes and businesses. The last section is a resource on recycling in our watershed complete with a list of agencies providing information on Best Management Practices (“Getting Help”) or recycling (“Recyclers”). The Lackawanna River Corridor Association acknowledges support from the Scranton Area Foundation and the Membership of the LRCA in funding the development of this publication. Further, the staff and board of the LRCA cites the continued support given by the Scranton Area Foundation throughout the nearly 20-year history of the Association. As a member-driven environmental organization, LRCA welcomes membership. LRCA is a non-for-profit, 501(C) 3 corporation. All gifts to the LRCA are tax-deductible. Visit our website at www.lrca.org. Contact us via email at [email protected] or call the Association at 570- 207-7608.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL SESSION FLOOD CONTROL and HAZARD MITIGATION ITEMIZATION ACT of 1996 Act of Jul
    SPECIAL SESSION FLOOD CONTROL AND HAZARD MITIGATION ITEMIZATION ACT OF 1996 Act of Jul. 11, 1996, Special Session 2, P.L. 1791, No. 8 Cl. 86 Special Session No. 2 of 1996 No. 1996-8 AN ACT Itemizing public improvement projects for flood protection and flood damage repair to be constructed by the Department of General Services, together with their estimated financial costs; authorizing the use of disaster assistance bond funding for financing the projects to be constructed by the Department of General Services; stating the estimated useful life of the projects; making an appropriation; providing for the adoption of specific blizzard or flood mitigation projects or flood assistance projects to be financed from current revenues or from debt incurred under clause (1) of subsection (a) of section 7 of Article VIII of the Constitution of Pennsylvania; and making repeals. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 101. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Special Session Flood Control and Hazard Mitigation Itemization Act of 1996. CHAPTER 3 FLOOD CAPITAL BUDGET PROJECT ITEMIZATIONS Section 301. Short title of chapter. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Special Session Flood Capital Budget Project Itemization Act of 1996. Section 302. Construction of chapter. The provisions of this chapter shall be construed unless specifically provided otherwise as a supplement to the act of July 6, 1995 (P.L.269, No.38), known as the Capital Budget Act of 1995-1996. Section 303. Total authorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 2.6.1 Hydrologic11x17
    HE k AR e T LEMON e LA NICHOLSON r K N RD C E O S k R K c SOUTH BRANCH TUNKHANNOCK CREEK b D R o Tri 288 A n J 95 L n O T C a o S k D h R o R o k D ut KS ck D h o FELL 107 n no Cre B TUNKHANNOCK CREEK ek R r GREENFIELD r N u n an a A c T h B A h E k N h L T h B n c u s H L n u I n H u a T k S Y unkhannock Creek O R r 407 V h D k h 7 e B a c L S GREE n 4 N e h n 2 FALL BROOK t L n 11 r a N A V 0 u r I o C o O T A B c S K r S k k f h W NFI i t SR c ranch T P b E O u C o o r E 2 3 R n M G S e L 85 n 5 o e D 83 E a 8 T D O k O SR 0 BENTON f 8 R F L h 8 T RD a 2 7 ll Broo L k S 8 k U n b 8 D i R O 2 u r b S R 011 SH SR 0107 SH T C T i 0 H RD To South B r S 4 T LL h B HI c BU ER 0 NK N n R 7 a A O r S M O B 28849 H A K h t E S S u Trib D o S 438 R T S R k E e 1 o L e 0 T ek L r k re I 0 V e C A C 6 k W L L S 6 k oc roo e 1 n y B r an S 8 h d D sh k e u C n 8 Tu H R n o s 2 anch R T e r n Tun b B h kh T 3 a e e 107 nc nno 7 i ra ck C A r h re 5 L t K B ek CLINTON T h C 8 t L u o u 2 LACKAWANNA o D o S e T b o e S i T IL 4 97 r s 6 88 T 2 W C R 8 RD ib R D Tr r C 8 2 k e Y e NING e D k D ib N RUSH BROOK R E 524 re A HW r C ON C M S E N T W M K y 81 N e HRIS E U n d TY MAT H L E n P D ed e A T R K y n L SE C n 6 N r e U ee S k K S o 6 R SR T 0006 SH LAPLUME 0 FACTORYVILLE 5 4 G 6 I LEES CREEK 8 3 B 8 8 S NORTH ABINGTON 2 O k Sou N To th Bran H S 827 S e ch b B 28 o S U ib e T i H R Tr u r N t r u TUNKHANNOCK h n T H D C k CARBONDALE B R h 524 U r E ly a 0 a r n B n M e k n U e o R C D ch L k e c S SOUTH BRANCH TUNKHANNOCK CREEK P c r k O R T A
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - November 2018
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - November 2018 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.554253 -80.206802 7.91 Armstrong Birch Run Allegheny River Headwaters dnst to mouth 41.033300 -79.619414 1.10 Armstrong Bullock Run North Fork Pine Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.879723 -79.441391 1.81 Armstrong Cornplanter Run Buffalo Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.754444 -79.671944 1.76 Armstrong Cove Run Sugar Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.987652 -79.634421 2.59 Armstrong Crooked Creek Allegheny River Headwaters to conf Pine Rn 40.722221 -79.102501 8.18 Armstrong Foundry Run Mahoning Creek Lake Headwaters
    [Show full text]
  • Annex a TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I
    Annex A TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Subpart C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES ARTICLE II. WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER 93. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS DESIGNATED WATER USES AND WATER QUALITY CRITERIA Editor’s Note: Additional changes to drainage list 93.9d were proposed on October 21, 2017 in the Pennsylvania Bulletin (47 Pa.B. 6609), including a stream name correction from “Beaverdam Run” to “Beaver Run.” § 93.9d. Drainage List D. Delaware River Basin in Pennsylvania Lehigh River Stream Zone County Water Uses Exceptions Protected to Specific Criteria * * * * * * 2—Lehigh River Main Stem, PA 903 Lehigh TSF, MF None Bridge to Allentown Dam 3—[Unnamed Basins, PA 903 Carbon[- CWF, MF None Tributaries] UNTs to Bridge to [Allentown Lehigh] Lehigh River Dam] UNT 03913 at 40°48'11.1"N; 75°40'20.6"W 3—Silkmill Run Basin Carbon CWF, MF None 3—Mauch Chunk Basin, Source to SR Carbon EV, MF None Creek 902 Bridge 3—Mauch Chunk Basin, SR 902 Bridge Carbon CWF, MF None Creek to Mouth 1 3—Beaverdam Run Basin Carbon HQ-CWF, None MF 3—Long Run Basin Carbon CWF, MF None Basin, Source to [Carbon] 3—Mahoning Creek CWF, MF None Wash Creek Schuylkill HQ-CWF, 4—Wash Creek Basin Schuylkill None MF Basin, Wash Creek to UNT 04074 at 3—Mahoning Creek Schuylkill CWF, MF None 40°46'43.4"N; 75°50'35.2"W HQ-CWF, 4—UNT 04074 Basin Schuylkill None MF Basin, UNT 04074 3—Mahoning Creek Carbon CWF, MF None to Mouth Basin, Source to SR 3—Pohopoco Creek 3016 Bridge at Monroe CWF, MF None Merwinsburg Main Stem, SR 3016 Bridge to
    [Show full text]
  • Lackawanna River Tributaries Study/Plan
    Cheryl Nolan 2013 COLDWATER Watershed Specialist Lackawanna County Conservation District HERITAGE PARTNERSHIP GRANT LACKAWANNA RIVER TRIBUTARIES STUDY/PLAN Coldwater Heritage Partnership Grant Final Report June 25, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 2 II. Methodology .......................................................................................................................................... 5 III. Results .................................................................................................................................................... 5 A. Chemistry ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Equipment .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Results Summary ............................................................................................................................... 5 B. Benthic Macroinvertebrates ................................................................................................................. 7 C. Fish Population – Leggetts Creek (see Appendix A for complete report) .......................................... 9 D. Habitat Assessment (see Appendix B for complete assessment) ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Bulletin
    Volume 33 Number 50 Saturday, December 13, 2003 • Harrisburg, Pa. Pages 6005—6196 See Part II page 6137 for the Part I Department of Agriculture’s Agencies in this issue: Food Code Regulations The General Assembly The Courts Department of Agriculture Department of Banking Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of State Department of Transportation Fish and Boat Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Liquor Control Board Municipal Police Officers’ Education and Training Commission Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 349, December 2003 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publication and effectiveness of Com- monwealth Documents). Subscription rate $82.00 per year, postpaid to points in the United States. Individual copies $2.50. Checks for subscriptions and individual copies should be made payable to ‘‘Fry Communications, Inc.’’ Periodicals postage paid at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Postmaster send address changes to: FRY COMMUNICATIONS Orders for subscriptions and other circulation matters Attn: Pennsylvania Bulletin should be sent to: 800 W. Church Rd. Fry Communications, Inc. Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania 17055-3198 Attn: Pennsylvania Bulletin (717) 766-0211 ext. 2340 800 W. Church Rd. (800) 334-1429 ext. 2340 (toll free, out-of-State) Mechanicsburg, PA 17055-3198 (800) 524-3232 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Annex a TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    Annex A TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Subpart C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES ARTICLE II. WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER 93. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS DESIGNATED WATER USES AND WATER QUALITY CRITERIA § 93.9d. Drainage List D. Delaware River Basin in Pennsylvania Lehigh River Exceptions Water Uses Stream Zone County To Specific Protected Criteria 2—Lehigh River Main Stem, the point Lehigh TSF, MF None at 40° 52' 3.5" N; 75° 44' 9.3" W to Allentown Dam 3—[Unnamed Basins, the point at Carbon[- CWF, MF None Tributaries] UNTs 40° 52' 3.5" N; 75° Lehigh] to Lehigh River 44' 9.3" W to [Allentown Dam] UNT 03913 at 40°48`11.1"N; 75°40`20.6"W 3—Silkmill Run Basin Carbon CWF, MF None 3—Mauch Chunk Creek 5—White Bear Creek Basin, Source to SR Carbon EV, MF None 902 Bridge 5—White Bear Creek Basin, SR 902 Bridge Carbon CWF, MF None to inlet of Mauch Chunk Lake 4—Mauch Chunk Basin Carbon CWF, MF None Lake 3—Mauch Chunk Basin, Mauch Chunk Carbon CWF, MF None Creek Lake Dam to Mouth 1 3—Beaver Run Basin Carbon HQ-CWF, None MF 3—Long Run Basin Carbon CWF, MF None 3—Mahoning Creek Basin, Source to [Carbon] CWF, MF None Wash Creek Schuylkill 4—Wash Creek Basin Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None MF 3—Mahoning Creek Basin, Wash Creek Schuylkill CWF, MF None to UNT 04074 at 40°46`43.4"N; 75°50`35.2"W 4—UNT 04074 Basin Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None MF 3—Mahoning Creek Basin, UNT 04074 to Carbon CWF, MF None Mouth 3—Pohopoco Creek Basin, Source to SR Monroe CWF, MF None 3016 Bridge at Merwinsburg 3—Pohopoco Creek Main Stem, SR 3016
    [Show full text]