DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Annex a TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Annex a TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Annex A TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Subpart C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES ARTICLE II. WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER 93. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS DESIGNATED WATER USES AND WATER QUALITY CRITERIA § 93.9d. Drainage List D. Delaware River Basin in Pennsylvania Lehigh River Exceptions Water Uses Stream Zone County To Specific Protected Criteria 2—Lehigh River Main Stem, the point Lehigh TSF, MF None at 40° 52' 3.5" N; 75° 44' 9.3" W to Allentown Dam 3—[Unnamed Basins, the point at Carbon[- CWF, MF None Tributaries] UNTs 40° 52' 3.5" N; 75° Lehigh] to Lehigh River 44' 9.3" W to [Allentown Dam] UNT 03913 at 40°48`11.1"N; 75°40`20.6"W 3—Silkmill Run Basin Carbon CWF, MF None 3—Mauch Chunk Creek 5—White Bear Creek Basin, Source to SR Carbon EV, MF None 902 Bridge 5—White Bear Creek Basin, SR 902 Bridge Carbon CWF, MF None to inlet of Mauch Chunk Lake 4—Mauch Chunk Basin Carbon CWF, MF None Lake 3—Mauch Chunk Basin, Mauch Chunk Carbon CWF, MF None Creek Lake Dam to Mouth 1 3—Beaver Run Basin Carbon HQ-CWF, None MF 3—Long Run Basin Carbon CWF, MF None 3—Mahoning Creek Basin, Source to [Carbon] CWF, MF None Wash Creek Schuylkill 4—Wash Creek Basin Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None MF 3—Mahoning Creek Basin, Wash Creek Schuylkill CWF, MF None to UNT 04074 at 40°46`43.4"N; 75°50`35.2"W 4—UNT 04074 Basin Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None MF 3—Mahoning Creek Basin, UNT 04074 to Carbon CWF, MF None Mouth 3—Pohopoco Creek Basin, Source to SR Monroe CWF, MF None 3016 Bridge at Merwinsburg 3—Pohopoco Creek Main Stem, SR 3016 Monroe HQ-CWF, None Bridge to US 209 MF Bridge at Kresgeville at 40°53`51.0"N; 75°30`8.8"W 4—[Unnamed Basins, SR 3016 Monroe CWF, MF None Tributaries] UNTs Bridge to US 209 to Pohopoco Creek Bridge at Kresgeville 4—Sugar Hollow Basin Monroe CWF, MF None Creek 4—Weir Creek Basin Monroe CWF, MF None 4—Middle Creek Basin, Source to T Monroe CWF, MF None 444 Bridge 4—Middle Creek Basin, T 444 Bridge Monroe HQ-CWF, None to Mouth MF 3—Pohopoco Creek Basin, US 209 Bridge Carbon CWF, MF None at Kresgeville to Wild Creek 4—Wild Creek Basin Carbon EV, MF None 2 3—Pohopoco Creek Basin, Wild Creek to Carbon CWF, MF None UNT 64089 at 40°48`55.7"N; 75°40`21.0"W [Mouth] 4—UNT 64089 Basin, Source to Carbon CWF, MF None (locally known as UNT 04088 at Lehigh Canal) 40°49`47.3"N; 75°41`58.9"W 5—UNT 04088 Basin, Source to Carbon HQ-CWF, None Phifer Ice Dam inlet MF at 40°50`27.7"N; 75°41`21.0"W 5—UNT 04088 Basin, Phifer Ice Carbon CWF, MF None Dam inlet to Mouth 4—UNT 64089 Basin, UNT 04088 to Carbon CWF, MF None Mouth 3—Pohopoco Creek Basin, UNT 64089 to Carbon CWF, MF None Mouth 3—UNT 03913 [Main Stem] BASIN Carbon HQ-CWF, None (locally known as MF Nis Hollow) [4—Tributaries to Basins Carbon CWF, MF None] UNT 03913 3—UNTs to Lehigh Basins, UNT 03913 Carbon- CWF, MF None River to Allentown Dam Lehigh- Northampton 3—Fireline Creek Basin, Source to Carbon HQ-CWF, None UNT 03907 at MF 40°49`1.0"N; 75°38`5.2"W 4—UNT 03907 Basin Carbon CWF, MF None 3—Fireline Creek [Main Stem] BASIN, Carbon HQ-CWF, None UNT 03907 to MF Mouth [4—Tributaries to Basins, UNT 03907 Carbon CWF, MF None] Fireline Creek to Mouth 3—Lizard Creek Basin, Source to T- Schuylkill CWF, MF None 922 Bridge * * * * * § 93.9f. Drainage List F. Delaware River Basin in Pennsylvania 3 Schuylkill River Exceptions Water Uses Stream Zone County To Specific Protected Criteria 4—Still Creek Basin, Tamaqua Schuylkill CWF, MF None Water Supply Dam to Mouth 3—Little Schuylkill Basin, Still Creek to Schuylkill CWF, MF None River [Owl Creek] UNT at 40°48`48.5"N; 75°58`45.0"W 4—UNT at Basin Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None 40°48`48.5"N; MF 75°58`45.0"W 3—Little Schuylkill Basin, UNT at Schuylkill CWF, MF None River 40°48`48.5"N; 75°58`45.0"W to Owl Creek 4—Owl Creek Basin Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None MF 3—Little Schuylkill Basin, Owl Creek to Schuylkill CWF, MF None River [Cold Run] UNT 02248 at 40°46`46.8"N; 75°57`39.6"W 4—UNT 02248 to Basin Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None Little Schuylkill MF River 3—Little Schuylkill Basin, UNT 02248 to Schuylkill CWF, MF None River Cold Run 4—Cold Run Basin, Source to Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None Beaver Creek MF 5—Beaver Creek Basin, Source to Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None [Church Lane] MF Tabernacle Drive at [RM 1.5] 40°44`18.7"N; 76°1`26.9"W 5—Beaver Creek Basin, [RM 1.5] Schuylkill CWF, MF None 40°44`18.7"N; 76°1`26.9"W to Mouth 4 4—Cold Run Basin, Beaver Creek Schuylkill CWF, MF None to Mouth 3—Little Schuylkill Basin, Cold Run to Schuylkill CWF, MF None River UNT 02206 at [RM 4.3] 40°37`40.8"N; 76°0`53.8"W 4—[Unnamed Basin Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None Tributary] UNT MF 02206 to Little Schuylkill River 3—Little Schuylkill Basin, UNT 02206 to Schuylkill CWF, MF None River [Rattling Run] UNT 02204 at 40°36`41.4"N; 76°1`6.3"W 4—UNT 02204 to Basin Schuylkill HQ-CWF, None Little Schuylkill MF River 3—Little Schuylkill Basin, UNT 02204 to Schuylkill CWF, MF None River Rattling Run 4—Rattling Run Basin, Source to [PA] Schuylkill EV, MF None SR 61 4—Rattling Run Basin, [PA] SR 61 to Schuylkill CWF, MF None Mouth 3—Little Schuylkill Basin, Rattling Run to Schuylkill CWF, MF None River Mouth * * * * * 3—Hay Creek Basin, Birdsboro Berks CWF, MF None Boundary to Mouth 3—Sixpenny Creek Basin[, Source to Berks HQ-CWF, None UNT 64027 at MF 40°14`37.2"N; 75°46`40.3"W] [4—UNT 64027 to Basin Berks HQ-CWF, None Sixpenny Creek MF 3—Sixpenny Creek Basin, UNT 64027 to Berks CWF, MF None] Mouth 3—Monocacy Creek Basin, Source to UNT Berks WWF, MF None 01762 at 40°22`1.3"N; 75°48`35.3"W * * * * * 5 § 93.9j. Drainage List J. Susquehanna River Basin in Pennsylvania Lackawanna River Exceptions Water Uses Stream Zone County To Specific Protected Criteria 1—Susquehanna River 2—Lackawanna Basin, Source to Susquehanna CWF, MF None River East Branch Lackawanna River [3—West Branch Basin, Source to Susquehanna CWF, MF None] Lackawanna River Confluence with East Branch 3—East Branch Basin[, Source to Susquehanna HQ-CWF, None Lackawanna River Confluence with MF West Branch] 2—Lackawanna Main Stem, Lackawanna HQ-CWF, None River [Confluence of East MF and West Branches] East Branch Lackawanna River to SR 0347 Bridge at Dickson City 3—[UNTs] Basins, [Confluence Susquehanna CWF, MF None Tributaries to of East and West [—Wayne] Lackawanna River Branches] East Branch Lackawanna River to [Clarks Creek] Brace Brook 3—Brace Brook Basin Susquehanna HQ-CWF, None MF 3—Tributaries to Basins, Brace Brook Wayne CWF, MF None Lackawanna River to Clarks Creek 3—Clarks Creek Basin Wayne EV, MF None 3—[UNTs] Basins, Clarks Creek Wayne— CWF, MF None Tributaries to to [SR 0347 Bridge Lackawanna Lackawanna River at Dickson City] Aylesworth Creek [3—Wilson Creek Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 3—Coal Brook Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 6 3—Racket Brook Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 3—Fall Brook Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 3—Lees Creek Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 3—Powderly Creek Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 3—Rush Brook Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None] 3—Aylesworth Creek Basin, Source to Lackawanna HQ-CWF, None UNT 28567 at MF 41°31`18.6"N; 75°31`23.5"W 4—UNT 28567 Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 3—Aylesworth Basin, UNT 28567 to Lackawanna CWF, MF None Creek Mouth 3—Tributaries to Basins, Aylesworth Lackawanna CWF, MF None Lackawanna River Creek to Grassey Island Creek [3—White Oak Run Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 3—Laurel Run Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None] 3—Grassey Island Basin, Source to Lackawanna HQ-CWF, None Creek [1100 ft Contour MF Line (Olyphant 7 1/2` Quadrangle)] US Hwy 6 3—Grassey Island Basin, [1100 ft Lackawanna CWF, MF None Creek Contour Line] US Hwy 6 to Mouth 3—Tributaries to Basins, Grassey Lackawanna CWF, MF None Lackawanna River Island Creek to SR 0347 Bridge [3—Sterry Creek Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 3—Wildcat Creek Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 3—Hull Creek Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None 2—Lackawanna Main Stem, SR 0347 Luzerne CWF, MF None River Bridge to Mouth 3—Unnamed Basins, SR 0347 Luzerne CWF, MF None] Tributaries to Bridge to Mouth Lackawanna River 2—Lackawanna Basin, SR 0347 Lackawanna CWF, MF None River Bridge to Eddy Creek 3—Eddy Creek Basin Lackawanna WWF, MF None 7 2—Lackawanna Basin, Eddy Creek Lackawanna CWF, MF None River to Leggetts Creek 3—Leggetts Creek Basin, Source to Lackawanna CWF, MF None Summit Lake Creek 4—Summit Lake Basin Lackawanna TSF, MF None Creek 3—Leggetts Creek Basin, Summit Lake Lackawanna TSF, MF None Creek to Mouth [3—Meadow Brook Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None] 2—Lackawanna Basin, Leggetts Lackawanna CWF, MF None River Creek to Roaring Brook 3—Roaring Brook Basin, Source to Inlet Lackawanna HQ-CWF, None of Elmhurst Reservoir MF 3—Roaring Brook Basin, Inlet of Lackawanna CWF, MF None Elmhurst Reservoir to Mouth 2—Lackawanna Basin, Roaring Lackawanna CWF, MF None River Brook to Stafford Meadow Brook 3—Stafford Meadow Basin, Source to Lackawanna HQ-CWF, None Brook Farthest Downstream MF Crossing of Scranton- Moosic Corporate Boundary 3—Stafford Meadow Basin, Farthest Lackawanna WWF, MF None Brook Downstream Crossing of Scranton-Moosic Corporate Boundary to Mouth [3—Keyser Creek Basin Lackawanna CWF, MF None] 2—Lackawanna Basin, Stafford Lackawanna CWF, MF None River Meadow Brook to Spring Brook 3—Spring Brook Basin, Source to N.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leggets Creek Habitat Enhancement
    Cheryl Nolan 2017 COLDWATER Watershed Specialist Lackawanna County Conservation District HERITAGE PARTNERSHIP IMPLEMENTATION GRANT Leggetts Creek Habitat Enhancement and Streambank Stabilization Project Coldwater Heritage Partnership Grant Final Report January 9, 2018 Table of Contents I. Project summary ............................................................................................................................................ 2 II. Project Outcomes...................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Were all project objectives met? .......................................................................................................... 3 B. If not, which ones and why not? .......................................................................................................... 3 C. Is project considered complete? If not, what remains to be accomplished? .................................... 3 III. Project Sustainability................................................................................................................................. 6 A. Discuss the long term sustainability of the project as implemented. What are potential threats to sustainability? ................................................................................................................................................ 6 B. Monitoring, operation and maintenance plans. .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marcellus Cover.Indd
    The Science beneath the Surface A Very Short Guide to the Marcellus Shale Don Duggan-Haas, Robert M. Ross, and Warren D. Allmon The Science beneath the Surface: A Very Short Guide to the Marcellus Shale by Don Duggan-Haas, Robert M. Ross, and Warren D. Allmon with contributions by Kelly E. Cronin, Trisha A. Smrecak, and Sara Auer Perry Paleontological Research Institution 2013 ISBN 978-0-87710-502-2 Paleontological Research Institution Special Publication No. 43 © 2013 Paleontological Research Institution 1259 Trumansburg Road Ithaca, New York 14850 U.S.A. http://www.museumoftheearth.org Design and layout by Paula M. Mikkelsen. Th is book is printed on paper certifi ed by the Forest Stewardship Council, https://us.fsc.org/. Cite this book as: Duggan-Haas, D., R. M. Ross, and W. D. Allmon, with K. E. Cronin, T. A. Smrecak, and S. Auer Perry. 2013. Th e Science Beneath the Surface: A Very Short Guide to the Marcellus Shale. Paleontological Research Institution (Special Publication 43), Ithaca, New York, 252 pp. On the cover: Outcrop of the Marcellus Shale at its “type locality” (the fi rst place that it was described in scientifi c literature, and for which it is named) in Marcellus, New York. Photo by Ben Aronson, courtesy of Linda Ivany. Table of Contents Preface and Acknowledgments . iii Introduction . .1 Chapter 1. Geology of the Marcellus Shale . 5 Chapter 2. Why the Geology Matters . 19 Chapter 3. Th e Technology of Shale Gas Extraction . 33 Chapter 4. Water and Marcellus Shale Development . 63 Chapter 5. Beyond Water: Other Environmental Impacts of Marcellus Gas Development .
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • AML Pilot Program) for FY 2016 – FY 2017
    Report on Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Economic Development Pilot Program (AML Pilot Program) for FY 2016 – FY 2017 Prepared by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) Prepared by the OSMRE Program Support Directorate March 28, 2017 Page 1 of 18 I. Introduction and Background The Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Economic Development Pilot Program (AML Pilot) for FY 2016 was authorized by Congress under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (Public Law 114-113) and enacted on December 18, 2015. Administered by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), the AML Pilot provided $30 million of US Treasury Funds to each of the three Appalachian state AML Programs (Kentucky, Pennsylvania and West Virginia) which have the highest amount of unfunded coal-related problems that are classified as Priority 1 and Priority 2 abandoned mine lands sites and inventoried in the Enhanced Abandoned Mine Land Inventory System (e-AMLIS). The AML Pilot funds are to be used “for the reclamation of abandoned mine lands in conjunction with economic and community development and reuse goals”. This report describes implementation actions for the AML Pilot. II. Implementation of the AML Pilot Program OSMRE facilitated a meeting on February 24, 2016, in West Virginia with state AML Program staff from Kentucky, Pennsylvania and West Virginia to obtain input on the implementation on the AML Pilot Program. A second meeting was held on March 16, 2016, in Lexington, Kentucky to solicit input from additional stakeholders on the AML Pilot. OSMRE also participated in workshops with economic development organizations convened by the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) in the three states to provide information about the AML Pilot Program and to encourage state and local economic developers to identify opportunities to align and leverage their efforts with AML reclamation projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Geology and Soils of the Elmira -Williamsport Region, New York and Pennsylvania
    Surficial Geology and Soils of the Elmira -Williamsport Region, New York and Pennsylvania GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 379 Prepared cooperatively by the U.S. Department of the Interior^ Geological Survey and the U.S. De­ partment of Agriculture^ Soil Conservation Service Surficial Geology and Soils of the Elmira-Williamsport Region, New York and Pennsylvania By CHARLES S. DENNY, Geological Survey, and WALTER H. LYFORD, Soil Conservation Service With a section on FOREST REGIONS AND GREAT SOIL GROUPS By JOHN C. GOODLETT and WALTER H. LYFORD GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 379 Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey and the Soil Conservation Service UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 CONTENTS Page Soils Continued Page Abstract--- ________________________________________ 1 Sols Bruns Acides, Gray-Brown Podzolic, and Red- Introduction_______________________________________ 2 Yellow Podzolic soils.._--_-_-__-__-___-_-__-__ 34 Acknowledgments-- _ ________________________________ 3 Weikert soil near Hughesville, Lycoming County, Topography. _______________________________________ 3 Pa______________________________________ 34 Bedrock geology.___________________________________ 4 Podzols and Sols Bruns Acides ____________________ 36 Surficial deposits of pre-Wisconsin age_________________ 4 Sols Bruns Acides and LowHumic-Gley soils._______ 37 Drift...__.____________________________________ 5 Chenango-Tunkhannock association. __________ 37 Colluvium and residuum_--_______-_--_-___-_____ 6 Chenango soil near Owego, Tioga County, Drift of Wisconsin age_-_-___________________________ 6 N.Y_________________________________ 37 Till. ________________________________________ 6 Lordstown-Bath-Mardin-Volusia association.... 39 Glaciofluvial deposits.___________________________ 7 Bath soil near Owego, Tioga County, N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • RULES and REGULATIONS Title 25—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION [25 PA
    1226 RULES AND REGULATIONS Title 25—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION [25 PA. CODE CH. 93] Corrective Amendment to 25 Pa. Code § 93.9j The Department of Environmental Protection (Department) has discovered a discrepancy between the agency text of 25 Pa. Code § 93.9j (relating to Drainage List J) as deposited with the Legislative Reference Bureau (Bureau) and published at 32 Pa.B. 4695, 4699 (September 28, 2002) and the official text as published in the Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet No. 337, December 2002), and as currently appearing in the Pennsylvania Code. When the amendments made by the Department at 32 Pa.B. 4695 were codified, an entry for the Lackawanna River in Luzerne County and an unnamed tributary to it were never deleted as proposed. Therefore, under 45 Pa.C.S. § 901: The Department has deposited with the Bureau a corrective amendment to 25 Pa. Code § 93.9j. The corrective amendment to 25 Pa. Code § 93.9j is effective as of December 7, 2002, the date the defective official text was announced in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. The correct version of 25 Pa. Code § 93.9j appears in Annex A, with ellipses referring to the existing text of the regulation. Annex A TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Subpart C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES ARTICLE II. WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER 93. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS § 93.9j. Drainage List J. Susquehanna River Basin in Pennsylvania Lackawanna River Exceptions Water Uses To Specific Stream Zone County
    [Show full text]
  • Download Proposed Regulation
    REVISED 12/16 INDEØTg%ORV Regulatory Analysis Form (Completed by PromulgatingAgency) Wfl[: >ic (All Comments submitted on this regulation will appear on IRRC’s website) Mt. — 4 (1) Agency I Environmental Protection Thdepenqp Rf&uIt -Ui, Review r,.qu; (2) Agency Number: 7 Identification Number: 548 IRRC Number: (3) PA Code Cite: 25 Pa. Code Chapter 93 (4) Short Title: Water Quality Standards — Class A Stream Redesignations (5) Agency Contacts (List Telephone Number and Email Address): Primary Contact: Laura Edinger; 717.783.8727; ledingerpa.gov Secondary Contact: Jessica Shirley; 717.783.8727; jesshirleypa.gov (6) Type of Rulemaking (check applicable box): Proposed Regulation El Emergency Certification Regulation El Final Regulation El Certification by the Governor El Final Omitted Regulation El Certification by the Attorney General (7) Briefly explain the regulation in clear and nontechnical language. (100 words or less) The amendments to Chapter 93 reflect the list of recommended redesignations of streams as embedded in the attached Water Quality Standards Review Stream Redesignation Evaluation Report. The proposed regulation will update and revise stream use designations in 25 Pa. Code § 93.9d, 93.9f, 93.9j, 93.9k, 93.91, 93.9m, 93.9p, 93.9q, 93.9r, and 93.9t. These changes will not impose any new operating requirements on existing wastewater discharges or other existing activities regulated by the Department under existing permits or approvals. If a new, increased or additional discharge is proposed by a permit applicant, more stringent treatment requirements and enhanced best management practices (BMPs) may be necessary to maintain and protect the existing quality of those waters.
    [Show full text]
  • April 24, 2010 (Pages 2077-2232)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 40 (2010) Repository 4-24-2010 April 24, 2010 (Pages 2077-2232) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2010 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "April 24, 2010 (Pages 2077-2232)" (2010). Volume 40 (2010). 17. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2010/17 This April is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 40 (2010) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 40 Number 17 Saturday, April 24, 2010 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 2077—2232 See Part II page 2211 Part I for the Environmental Quality Board’s Agencies in this issue Dam Safety and Waterway Management The Courts Delaware River Basin Commission Department of Banking Department of Environmental Protection Department of Health Department of Labor and Industry Department of Public Welfare Department of Revenue Department of Transportation Environmental Quality Board Executive Board Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission State Board of Chiropractic State Board of Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists and Professional Counselors State Conservation Commission Detailed
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway and Bridge Projects With
    Date: 5/28/20 3:53PM Page 1 of 74 Scranton/Wilke-Barre MPO TIP - Highway & Bridge Projects Lackawanna PennDOT Project Id: 7764 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: West Lackawanna Ave. Bridge over Conrail Railroad Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on State Route 7302 (West Lackawanna Avenue) over Conrail Railroad in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County. Project Costs(In Thousands) Phase Fund 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Final Design STU $0 $0 $120 $0 $0 $0 Final Design 185 $0 $0 $30 $0 $0 $0 Construction STU $0 $0 $0 $800 $0 $0 Construction 185 $0 $0 $0 $200 $0 $0 Federal: $0 $0 $120 $800 $0 $0 State: $0 $0 $30 $200 $0 $0 Local/Other: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 - 2028 2029 - 2032 Period Totals: $0 $0 $150 $1,000 $0 $0 Total FFY 2021-2032 Cost $1,150 PennDOT Project Id: 7911 Project Administrator: PENNDOT Title: North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek Improvement Type: Replace/Rehab State Route: 7302 Municipality: Scranton (CITY) Air Quality Status: Exempt from Regional Conformity Analysis Estimated Construction Bid Date: 8/22/24 Air Quality Exempt Reason: S19 - Widen narw. pave. or recon brdgs (No addtl lanes) Actual Construction Bid Date: Location: Lackawanna County, City of Scranton, North Main Avenue Bridge Project Description: Bridge rehabilitation/replacement on North Main Avenue Bridge over Leggetts Creek in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County.
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Greatest Conservation Need Species Accounts
    2 0 1 5 – 2 0 2 5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Species Accounts Appendix 1.4C-Amphibians Amphibian Species of Greatest Conservation Need Maps: Physiographic Provinces and HUC Watersheds Species Accounts (Click species name below or bookmark to navigate to species account) AMPHIBIANS Eastern Hellbender Northern Ravine Salamander Mountain Chorus Frog Mudpuppy Eastern Mud Salamander Upland Chorus Frog Jefferson Salamander Eastern Spadefoot New Jersey Chorus Frog Blue-spotted Salamander Fowler’s Toad Western Chorus Frog Marbled Salamander Northern Cricket Frog Northern Leopard Frog Green Salamander Cope’s Gray Treefrog Southern Leopard Frog The following Physiographic Province and HUC Watershed maps are presented here for reference with conservation actions identified in the species accounts. Species account authors identified appropriate Physiographic Provinces or HUC Watershed (Level 4, 6, 8, 10, or statewide) for specific conservation actions to address identified threats. HUC watersheds used in this document were developed from the Watershed Boundary Dataset, a joint project of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Physiographic Provinces Central Lowlands Appalachian Plateaus New England Ridge and Valley Piedmont Atlantic Coastal Plain Appalachian Plateaus Central Lowlands Piedmont Atlantic Coastal Plain New England Ridge and Valley 675| Appendix 1.4 Amphibians Lake Erie Pennsylvania HUC4 and HUC6 Watersheds Eastern Lake Erie
    [Show full text]