DOCSLIB.ORG

The Terminologia Anatomica Matters: Examples from Didactic, Scientific, and Clinical Practice B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Terminologia Anatomica Matters: Examples from Didactic, Scientific, and Clinical Practice B Folia Morphol. Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 340–347 DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0078 R E V I E W A R T I C L E Copyright © 2017 Via Medica ISSN 0015–5659 www.fm.viamedica.pl The Terminologia Anatomica matters: examples from didactic, scientific, and clinical practice B. Strzelec1, 2, P.P. Chmielewski1, B. Gworys1 1Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland 2Department and Clinic of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland [Received: 19 August 2016; Accepted: 20 October 2016] The proper usage of the anatomical terminology is of paramount importance to all medical professionals. Although a multitude of studies have been devoted to issues associated with the use and application of the recent version of the anatomical terminology in both theoretical medicine and clinical practice, there are still many unresolved problems such as confusing terms, inconsistencies, and errors, including grammar and spelling mistakes. The aim of this article is to describe the current situation of the anatomical terminology and its usage in practice, as well as explain why it is so important to use precise, appropriate, and valid anatomical terms during the everyday communication among physicians from all medical branches. In this review, we discuss some confusing, obsolete, and erroneous terms that are still commonly used by many clinicians, and surgeons in particular, during the process of diagnosis and treatment. The use of these ambiguous, erroneous, and obsolete terms enhances the risk of miscommunication. We also provide some edifying examples from everyday clinical practice. (Folia Morphol 2017; 76, 3: 340–347) Key words: anatomical terminology, anatomical nomenclature, clinical anatomy, clinical practice, coding system of Terminologia Anatomica, general anatomy, gross anatomy INTRODUCTION tomical vocabulary is based on Ancient Greek and Latin Unlike in other medical fields, in anatomy it is impor- words, contains casual eponyms, used especially by clini- tant to distinguish between terminology, which is the cians and surgeons, and the literal meaning of a term set of terms approved by the Federative Committee on may not lend insight into its definition. Moreover, the Anatomical Terminology (FCAT) and nomenclature, which terminology commonly used by health care profession- is the standardised system of precisely defined terms, als in hospitals may significantly differ from the official created within the scope of terminology [6, 10, 12]. terminology used by anatomists. Such discrepancy can Human anatomy is a fundamental science, and the be a source of confusion or erroneous diagnosis and proper usage of anatomical terminology is of para- treatment, which eventually can be pernicious. There- mount importance to both medical students and prac- fore, the use of the recent version of the anatomical ticing physicians [9, 18, 28, 29]. Learning, remembering, terminology [5] in clinical practice is highly recommend- and understanding the specialised anatomical terms ed [10–13]. Although a host of studies have focused are arguably the greatest challenges faced by first year on issues associated with the use and application of medical students. All the more so because the ana- anatomical terminology and nomenclature in prac- Address for correspondence: Dr. P.P. Chmielewski, Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, ul. T. Chałubińskiego 6a, 50–368 Wrocław, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] 340 B. Strzelec et al., The usage of the Terminologia Anatomica tice [9, 13, 14, 17–22, 27, 30–32], there are still many as the Basel Nomina Anatomica (BNA), which omitted unresolved problems. For example, there is currently many synonymous and eponymous terms. In 1897, no precise definition of fascia as a unit [15, 25, 26]. Professor Stanisław Krysiński incorporated the BNA Similarly, we lack an exact definition of an arteriole [8]. into the Polish anatomical terminology. The BNA was Moreover, numerous terms are stated as synonyms [13]. accepted in Europe and in America, although older It should be stressed, however, that any minor change clinicians continued to use the previous terminology. to the current version of the anatomical terminology [5] Moreover, the BNA was not accepted worldwide, e.g. should be introduced with utmost caution, and any in France and Great Britain. In 1928, a Committee of major change would do more harm than good. the Anatomists of Great Britain and Ireland was set The purpose of this article is to describe the current up. The committee adopted the nomenclature known situation of the anatomical terminology and its usage in as the Birmingham Revision (BR). In 1935, the Jena clinical practice, as well as to explain why it is so impor- Nomina Anatomica (JNA) reformed the system of ana- tant to use precise, appropriate, and valid anatomical tomical nomenclature, but this attempt received little terms during both the process of teaching anatomy to attention. Until 1955, the BNA and JNA remained the medical students and in the everyday communication standard international anatomical terminology. In 1955, among health care specialists from all medical branches. the International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee We discuss some confusing, obsolete, and erroneous (IANC) established the Nomina Anatomica (NA), which terms that are still commonly used by clinicians and contained 5640 terms (4311 items), of which 76% were surgeons during diagnosis and treatment, which can unchanged from the BNA [13]. easily lead to miscommunication and misunderstanding. We also provide some edifying examples from everyday A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE didactic and clinical practice. TERMINOLOGIA ANATOMICA In 1997, the latest revision of the Latin and English THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT terminology was approved by the FCAT and published OF THE ANATOMICAL TERMINOLOGY as Terminologia Anatomica (TA) in 1998 [5]. It contains The anatomical terminology has been a matter of 7635 items, which shows a trend of extension and sta- controversy and disagreement since time immemorial. bilisation of nomenclature. Nevertheless, several errors, The same anatomical structures were differently named, including typographical ones, as well as some inconsist- described, and defined by different authors. Many terms encies have been noted. Therefore, a new edition of TA designated the shape, resemblance to other structures, has been published online in 2011 along with several or the function of the anatomical structures or even corrections and remedies to these errors. Moreover, religious beliefs and misunderstandings like the issue it has emerged that the TA has several weak points, of Adam’s apple. Therefore, over the centuries, many discrepancies, and certain segments are insufficiently attempts have been made in order to establish a general rich as they do not contain new terms for some small or terminology that would be acceptable to all anatomists variant structures. Since these structures and appropri- throughout the world. ate terms for them are very important from a scientific Ancient authors like Galen used only a limited num- point of view, some authors selected the most important ber of terms, and they were usually colloquial Greek structures and proposed new terms for them in order words [23]. In the early 16th century, Andreas Vesalius, to ameliorate and extend the most recent version of the one of the founders of modern human anatomy, de- TA [14]. Modern anatomical terms used in TA designate: scribed many new structures with the help of detailed — the shape of structures or resemblance to some and magnificent illustrations in his books. The third other structures found in nature, e.g. arachnoidea stage of development of terminology in the late 16th mater, hippocampus, uncus, cochlea, cauda equina, century was marked by innovation of a large number of sella turcica, cartilago arytenoidea et cricoidea, mus- terms for the muscles, nerves, and blood vessels. Sylvius culus deltoideus et trapezius, os pisiforme, vomer; in Paris and Bauhin in Basel, were the most prominent — the size or dimension of structures, e.g. tuberculum figures at that stage of the development of anatomical majus et minus (humeri), trochanter major et minor terminology and nomenclature [23]. (femoris), musculus gluteus maximus, medius et In 1895, an international commission formulated minimus, m. latissimus dorsi, m. pectoralis major et a standardised and simplified nomenclature, known minor, vena saphena magna et parva; 341 Folia Morphol., 2017, Vol. 76, No. 3 — the location or spatial relations, e.g. ligg. collateralia, ally contain small departures (Table 1) from the ter- lig. coracoacromiale, planum transpyloricum, trigonum minology adopted by the FCAT [5]. Fortunately, such femorale, epigastrium, cardia, regio hypochondriaca; minor mistakes or inaccuracies do not usually lead to — the function, e.g. atlas, cisterna chyli, confluens sinu- miscommunication as they do not change the mean- um, vesica urinaria, vesica biliaris seu fellea, funiculus ing of the term. For example, if the carotid triangle is spermaticus, m. sphincter et dilatator pupillae; erroneously referred to as “the carotid artery triangle” [2], — the colour, e.g. ligamenta flava, linea alba, macula it is redundant but relatively harmless because of explic- lutea, substantia nigra, nucleus ruber, and some itness. Similarly, the common use
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download PDF File
    Folia Morphol. Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 1–14 DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2019.0047 R E V I E W A R T I C L E Copyright © 2020 Via Medica ISSN 0015–5659 journals.viamedica.pl Should Terminologia Anatomica be revised and extended? A critical literature review P.P. Chmielewski1, B. Strzelec2, 3 1Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland 2Department and Clinic of Vascular, General and Transplantation Surgery, Jan Mikulicz-Radecki Medical University Hospital, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland 3Department and Clinic of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland [Received: 14 November 2018; Accepted: 31 December 2018] The first edition of the Terminologia Anatomica was published in 1998 by the Federative Committee for Anatomical Terminology, whereas the second edition was issued in 2011 by the Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminologies. Since then many attempts have been made to revise and extend the official terminology as several inconsistencies have been noted. Moreover, numerous crucial terms were either omitted or deliberately excluded from the official terminology, like sulcus popliteus and diaphragma urogenitale, respec- tively. Furthermore, several synonyms are to be discarded. Notwithstanding the criticism, the use of the current version of terminology is strongly recommended. Although the Terminologia Anatomica is open to future expansion and revision, every change should be made after a thorough discussion of the historical context and scientific legitimacy of a given term. The anatomical nomenclature must be as simple as possible but also precise and coherent. It is generally accepted that hasty innovation ought not to be endorsed.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix-A-Osteology-V-2.0.Pdf
    EXPLORATIONS: AN OPEN INVITATION TO BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY Editors: Beth Shook, Katie Nelson, Kelsie Aguilera and Lara Braff American Anthropological Association Arlington, VA 2019 Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. ISBN – 978-1-931303-63-7 www.explorations.americananthro.org Appendix A. Osteology Jason M. Organ, Ph.D., Indiana University School of Medicine Jessica N. Byram, Ph.D., Indiana University School of Medicine Learning Objectives • Identify anatomical position and anatomical planes, and use directional terms to describe relative positions of bones • Describe the gross structure and microstructure of bone as it relates to bone function • Describe types of bone formation and remodeling, and identify (by name) all of the bones of the human skeleton • Distinguish major bony features of the human skeleton like muscle attachment sites and passages for nerves and/or arteries and veins • Identify the bony features relevant to estimating age, sex, and ancestry in forensic and bioarchaeological contexts • Compare human and chimpanzee skeletal anatomy Anthropology is the study of people, and the skeleton is the framework of the person. So while all subdisciplines of anthropology study human behavior (culture, language, etc.) either presently or in the past, biological anthropology is the only subdiscipline that studies the human body specifically. And the fundamental core of the human (or any vertebrate) body is the skeleton. Osteology, or the study of bones, is central to biological anthropology because a solid foundation in osteology makes it possible to understand all sorts of aspects of how people have lived and evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 TERMINOLOGIA ANTHROPOLOGICA Names of The
    TERMINOLOGIA ANTHROPOLOGICA Names of the parts of the human body, terms of aspects and relationships, and osteological terminology are as in Terminologia Anatomica. GENERAL TERMS EXPLANANTION ADAPTATION Adjustment and change of an organism to a specific environment, due primarily to natural selection. ADAPTIVE RADIATION Divergence of an ancestral population through adaption and speciation into a number of ecological niches. ADULT Fully developed and mature individual ANAGENESIS The progressive adaption of a single evolutionary line, where the population becomes increasingly specialized to a niche that has remained fairly constant through time. ANCESTRY One’s family or ethnic descent, the evolutionary or genetic line of descent of an animal or plant / Ancestral descent or lineage ANTEMORTEM Biological processes that can result in skeletal modifications before death ANTHROPOCENTRICISM The belief that humans are the most important elements in the universe. ANTHROPOLOGY The study of human biology and behavior in the present and in the past ANTHROPOLOGIST BIOLOGICAL A specialist in the subfield of anthropology that studies humans as a biological species FORENSIC A specialist in the use of anatomical structures and physical characteristics to identify a subject for legal purposes PHYSICAL A specialist in the subfield of anthropology dealing with evolutionary changes in the human bodily structure and the classification of modern races 1 SOCIAL A specialist in the subfield of anthropology that deals with cultural and social phenomena such as kingship systems or beliefs ANTHROPOMETRY The study of human body measurement for use in anthropological classification and comparison ARCHETYPE That which is taken as the blueprint for a species or higher taxonomic category ARTIFACT remains of past human activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Terminologia Anatomica International Anatomical Terminology
    Terminologia Anatomica International Anatomical Terminology FCAT Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology 1998 Thieme Stuttgart • New York VIII Contents Anatomia generalis General Anatomy 1 .. Nomina generalia General terms 2 .. Partes corporis humani Parts of human body 3 .. Plana, linea et regiones Planes, lines and regions 7 ... Anatomia systemica Systemic anatomy 7 ... Ossa; Systema skeletale Bones; Skeletal system 7 .. Nomina generalia General terms 8 .. Cranium Cranium 9 .. Ossa cranii Bones of cranium 16 .. Columna vertebralis Vertebral column 17 .. Skeleton thoracis Thoracic skeleton 18 .. Ossa membri superioris Bones of upper limb 21 .. Ossa membri inferioris Bones of lower limb 25 ... Juncturae; Systema articulare Joints; Articular system 25 .. Nomina generalia General terms 26 .. Juncturae cranii Joints of skull 27 .. Juncturae columnae vertebralis Vertebral joints 28 .. Juncturae thoracis Thoracic joints 28 .. Juncturae cinguli pelvici Joints of pelvic girdle 28 .. Juncturae membri superioris Joints of upper limb 30 .. Juncturae membri inferioris Joints of lower limb 33 ... Musculi; Systema musculare Muscles; Muscular system 33 .. Nomina generalia General terms 34 .. Musculi capitis Muscles of head 35 .. Musculi colli; Musculi cervicis Muscles of neck 36 .. Musculi dorsi Muscles of back 37 ..., Musculi thoracis Muscles of thorax 38 .. Musculi abdominis Muscles of abdomen 40 .. Musculi membri superioris Muscles of upper limb 42 .. Musculi membri inferioris Muscles of lower limb 44 .. Vaginae tendinum et bursae Tendon sheaths and bursae 47 ... Systema digestorium Alimentary system 47 .. Os Mouth 50 .. Fauces Fauces 50 .. Pharynx Pharynx 51 .. Oesophagus Oesophagus 51 .. Gaster Stomach 52 .. Intestinum tenue Small intestine 53 .. Intestinum crassum Large intestine 54 .. Hepar Liver 56 .. Vesica biliaris; Vesica fellea Gallbladder 56 .. Pancreas Pancreas Contents IX 57 ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Terminologia Anatomica Matters: Examples from Didactic, Scientific, and Clinical Practice B
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Foliaprovided Morphol. by Via Medica Journals Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 340–347 DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0078 R E V I E W A R T I C L E Copyright © 2017 Via Medica ISSN 0015–5659 www.fm.viamedica.pl The Terminologia Anatomica matters: examples from didactic, scientific, and clinical practice B. Strzelec1, 2, P.P. Chmielewski1, B. Gworys1 1Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland 2Department and Clinic of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland [Received: 19 August 2016; Accepted: 20 October 2016] The proper usage of the anatomical terminology is of paramount importance to all medical professionals. Although a multitude of studies have been devoted to issues associated with the use and application of the recent version of the anatomical terminology in both theoretical medicine and clinical practice, there are still many unresolved problems such as confusing terms, inconsistencies, and errors, including grammar and spelling mistakes. The aim of this article is to describe the current situation of the anatomical terminology and its usage in practice, as well as explain why it is so important to use precise, appropriate, and valid anatomical terms during the everyday communication among physicians from all medical branches. In this review, we discuss some confusing, obsolete, and erroneous terms that are still commonly used by many clinicians, and surgeons in particular, during the process of diagnosis and treatment. The use of these ambiguous, erroneous, and obsolete terms enhances the risk of miscommunication.
    [Show full text]
  • Ta2, Part Iii
    TERMINOLOGIA ANATOMICA Second Edition (2.06) International Anatomical Terminology FIPAT The Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology A programme of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) TA2, PART III Contents: Systemata visceralia Visceral systems Caput V: Systema digestorium Chapter 5: Digestive system Caput VI: Systema respiratorium Chapter 6: Respiratory system Caput VII: Cavitas thoracis Chapter 7: Thoracic cavity Caput VIII: Systema urinarium Chapter 8: Urinary system Caput IX: Systemata genitalia Chapter 9: Genital systems Caput X: Cavitas abdominopelvica Chapter 10: Abdominopelvic cavity Bibliographic Reference Citation: FIPAT. Terminologia Anatomica. 2nd ed. FIPAT.library.dal.ca. Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology, 2019 Published pending approval by the General Assembly at the next Congress of IFAA (2019) Creative Commons License: The publication of Terminologia Anatomica is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license The individual terms in this terminology are within the public domain. Statements about terms being part of this international standard terminology should use the above bibliographic reference to cite this terminology. The unaltered PDF files of this terminology may be freely copied and distributed by users. IFAA member societies are authorized to publish translations of this terminology. Authors of other works that might be considered derivative should write to the Chair of FIPAT for permission to publish a derivative work. Caput V: SYSTEMA DIGESTORIUM Chapter 5: DIGESTIVE SYSTEM Latin term Latin synonym UK English US English English synonym Other 2772 Systemata visceralia Visceral systems Visceral systems Splanchnologia 2773 Systema digestorium Systema alimentarium Digestive system Digestive system Alimentary system Apparatus digestorius; Gastrointestinal system 2774 Stoma Ostium orale; Os Mouth Mouth 2775 Labia oris Lips Lips See Anatomia generalis (Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardized Digital Mapping of the Central Nervous System Connections in Humans
    Article ID: WMC00995 2046-1690 Standardized Digital Mapping Of The Central Nervous System Connections In Humans Corresponding Author: Dr. Slobodan Malobabic , Professor of Human Anatomy , Dept. of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade University , Dr Subotica 4/II , 11 0000 Submitting Author: Dr. Slobodan P Malobabic , Professor of Human Anatomy , Dept. of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade University , Dr Subotica 4/II , 11 0000 Article ID: WMC00995 Article Type: Original Articles Submitted on:16-Oct-2010, 09:39:54 AM GMT Published on: 16-Oct-2010, 01:42:44 PM GMT Article URL: http://www.webmedcentral.com/article_view/995 Subject Categories:ANATOMY Keywords:Human neuroanatomy, Central nervous system, Presentation, Connections mapping, Nervous pathways, Terminology How to cite the article:Malobabic S . Standardized Digital Mapping Of The Central Nervous System Connections In Humans . WebmedCentral ANATOMY 2010;1(10):WMC00995 Source(s) of Funding: There is not any founding source Competing Interests: There is not competition of interests related to this article. WebmedCentral > Original Articles Page 1 of 12 WMC00995 Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 22-Dec-2011, 07:25:05 AM Standardized Digital Mapping Of The Central Nervous System Connections In Humans Author(s): Malobabic S Abstract about the connections within the central nervous system (CNS) of vertebrates has been accumulated. In addition to directions of fiber pathways, also the sizes of these fibers, transmitters, actions (e.g. This paper attempts to unite different aspects of excitation- inhibition) and other relevant data were knowledge of both, human neuroanatomists and reported, identified or described. Throughout the neuroinformatics engineers, related to the same neuroscience community, there is a general frustration problem of presentation of human brain connections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standardisation of Anatomical, Histological and Embryological Terminology in Translating English-Based Anatomy Textbook Into Indonesian
    THE STANDARDISATION OF ANATOMICAL, HISTOLOGICAL AND EMBRYOLOGICAL TERMINOLOGY IN TRANSLATING ENGLISH-BASED ANATOMY TEXTBOOK INTO INDONESIAN (STANDARDISASI TERMINOLOGI ANATOMI, HISTOLOGI DAN EMBRIOLOGI DALAM MENERJEMAHKAN BUKU TEKS ANATOMI BERBASIS BAHASA INGGRIS KE BAHASA INDONESIA) Wita Anggraini Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Trisakti University Jl. Kyai Tapa (Grogol), West Jakarta 11440 (Campus B) email: [email protected] Abstract Anatomical terminology is derived from classical languages, primarily Latin. Latin was used as the language of science until the early 18th century, so all medical textbooks were previously written in Latin. The existence of Latin in the textbooks of anatomy-histology-embryology in Indonesia becomes a challenge for students, lecturers, and researchers because they often have no background knowledge of Latin. The gap in Latin makes English textbooks preferable. English-based anatomy textbooks have been widely translated into Indonesian, but the translation of anatomical terminology in English has no standardization yet. The translations of anatomical terms can be based on several sources, namely: (1) Nomina Anatomica, Nomina Histologica, and Nomina Embryologica; (2) Terminologia Anatomica (TA), Terminologia Histologica (TH), and Terminologia Embryologica (TE); (3) Absorption language by adopting Latin and writing the anatomical terms in accordance with Indonesian spelling; and (4) Translation from English to Indonesian. The aim of this paper was to initiate the selection and determination of the anatomical terms which should be used in Indonesian in order to translate the English-based anatomy textbooks. Keywords: anatomical terminology, translation, English, Latin, Indonesian Abstrak Istilah anatomi berakar pada bahasa klasik, terutama dalam bahasa Latin. Bahasa Latin digunakan sebagai bahasa ilmu sampai awal abad ke-18, sehingga semua buku teks kedokteran ditulis dalam bahasa Latin.
    [Show full text]
  • Usage of a Translated Version of Terminologia Anatomica in Brazil
    Published online: 2019-04-02 THIEME 106 Original Article | Artigo Original Usage of a Translated Version of Terminologia Anatomica in Brazil: An Examination of the Neurosurgical Literature Aderência à versão traduzida da terminologia anatômica no Brasil: Análise da literatura neurocirúrgica Krysna Pires Lessa1 Ítalo Gonçalo Matias Vilasbôas2 Marcos de Amorim Aquino3 Igor Lima Maldonado3,4,5,6 1 Department of Life Sciences, Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Address for correspondence Igor Lima Maldonado, Departamento de Salvador, Brazil Biomorfologia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal 2 Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil da Bahia, Avenida Reitor Miguel Calmom s/n. Vale do Canela Salvador, 3 Department of Biomorphology, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, BA, 40110-100, Brazil (e-mail: [email protected]). Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 4 Postgraduate Program in Medicine and Health, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 5 UMR Inserm U1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Tours, France 6 Le Studium Loire Valley Institute for Advanced Studies, Orleans, France Arq Bras Neurocir 2019;38:106–111. Abstract Introduction The linguistic factor may have delayed the universal adoption of the International Anatomical Terminology (IAT), which was widespread in Latin and in English only. Independent translations are possible, but they are not devoid of methodological difficulties. Objective To estimate the usage of the translated version of the Terminologia Anatomica in neurosurgical articles in Brazil. Method Consecutive national publications were checked for the correspondence of their anatomical terms to the following categories: IAT – Brazilian version; IAT in Latin; Nomina Anatomica – previous versions; incomplete terms; derivative terms; eponyms; neologisms; and others (misspellings and prosaic terms).
    [Show full text]
  • A Plea for an Extension of the Anatomical Nomenclature: Organ Systems
    BOSNIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES REVIEW ARTICLE WWW.BJBMS.ORG A plea for an extension of the anatomical nomenclature: Organ systems Vladimir Musil1*, Alzbeta Blankova2, Vlasta Dvorakova3, Radovan Turyna2,4, Vaclav Baca3 1Centre of Scientific Information, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic,2 Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 3Department of Health Care Studies, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Jihlava, Czech Republic, 4Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic ABSTRACT This article is the third part of a series aimed at correcting and extending the anatomical nomenclature. Communication in clinical medicine as well as in medical education is extensively composed of anatomical, histological, and embryological terms. Thus, to avoid any confusion, it is essential to have a concise, exact, perfect and correct anatomical nomenclature. The Terminologia Anatomica (TA) was published 20 years ago and during this period several revisions have been made. Nevertheless, some important anatomical structures are still not included in the nomenclature. Here we list a collection of 156 defined and explained technical terms related to the anatomical structures of the human body focusing on the digestive, respiratory, urinary and genital systems. These terms are set for discussion to be added into the new version of the TA. KEY WORDS: Anatomical terminology; anatomical nomenclature; Terminologia Anatomica DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2018.3195 Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2019;19(1):1‑13. © 2018 ABMSFBIH INTRODUCTION latest revision of the histological nomenclature under the title Terminologia Histologica [15]. In 2009, the FIPAT replaced This article is the third part of a series aimed at correct‑ the FCAT, and issued the Terminologia Embryologica (TE) ing and extending the anatomical nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Adjective Lymphaticus
    1 Lymphology 48 (2015) 1-5 ON THE ADJECTIVE LYMPHATICUS F. Simon, J. Danko Department of Classics (FS), Faculty of Arts, Pavol Jozef Safárik University in Kosice, and Institute of Anatomy (JD), Histology and Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacology in Kosice, Slovakia ABSTRACT The origin of the word lympha in Latin grammar is not entirely clear. Linguisticians The Latin word lympha is derived from make the connection with the adjective the adjective limpidus = clear, transparent, limpidus = clear, transparent, used especially although some Roman grammarians tried to mean clear, pellucid liquid (1). In Roman another derivation from the Greek word for literature the word lympha, more frequently water sprite nymfé, and then the adjective the plural lymphae, was commonly used in lymphaticus meant in Latin “stricken with the sense of clear water, or a source of pure nymph-like anger, gripped by madness.” water. Isidor of Seville, polyhistorian at the Thomas Bartholin, discoverer of the lymphatic crossover from antiquity to medieval times, system, was the first to use the word observes that Limpidum vinum, id est lymphaticus for new veins, because the liquid perspicuum, ab aquae specie dictum, quasi in them was watery. This term was accepted lymphidum; lympha enim aqua est (2), i.e., into the Basiliensia Nomina Anatomica but limpid wine is that which is translucent, this did not mean the end of attempts at named for its watery look, as if it were terminological changes, probably in an effort lymphidum, for lympha is water. The Roman to eliminate the incorrect connotations based grammarian Varro however tried to derive on the original understanding of this adjective.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Anatomical Terminology in the Last 25 Years
    Journal of the Anatomical Society of India 66S (2017) S31–S33 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of the Anatomical Society of India journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasi Review Article A comparison of the anatomical terminology in the last 25 years a, a a a Mert Ocak *, Hilal Akdemir Aktaş , Muhammet Bora Uzuner , Ferhat Geneci , b a Çagatay Aşkit , Mustafa F. Sargon a Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Ankara, Turkey b Ankara University Faculty of Languages, Hıstory and Geography Department of Ancient Languages and Literatures, Ankara, Turkey A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Introduction: Anatomical terminology forms the basis of communication in all health sciences. The Received 19 August 2016 terminology has been changing continuously since the 19th century, in accordance with the scientific Accepted 28 September 2017 innovations and clinical requirements. Available online 29 September 2017 Methods: In this study, the changes in anatomical terminology observed over the past 25 years were examined. The changes in anatomical terminology in Nomina Anatomica (1989), the Federative Keywords: Committee on Anatomical Terminology list (1996) and Terminologia Anatomica (1998) were assessed. Nomina anatomica Results: Comparisons revealed that 129 terms were removed from the terminology and 1359 terms were Terminologia anatomica added from Nomina Anatomica to Terminologia Anatomica. Furthermore, 196 of these terms were added FCAT from the FCAT list. In addition, grammatical changes were made in 563 terms over the past 25 years. Anatomy and medical Discussion: Many terms were added or replaced in accordance with scientific innovations and clinical needs.
    [Show full text]