Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany Promulgated by the Parliamentary Council on 23 May 1949 as amended up to June 2008 Published by: German Bundestag – Administration – Public Relations Division Berlin, 2008 www.bundestag.de Produced by: Ebner & Spiegel, Ulm Translated by: Professor Christian Tomuschat and Professor David P. Currie Translation revised by: Professor Christian Tomuschat and Professor Donald P. Kommers in cooperation with the Language Service of the German Bundestag All rights reserved. This publication is produced by the German Bundestag in the framework of its parliamentary public-relations activities. It is not intended for resale. It may not be used by political parties, parliamentary groups, Members of the Bundestag or candidates in their own public-relations activities, particularly those related to electoral canvassing. Contents Page BASIC LAW FOR THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY 8 PREAMBLE 8 I. BASIC RIGHTS 9 Article 1 [Human dignity – Human rights – Legally binding force of basic rights] 9 Article 2 [Personal freedoms] 9 Article 3 [Equality before the law] 9 Article 4 [Freedom of faith and conscience] 9 Article 5 [Freedom of expression, arts and sciences] 9 Article 6 [Marriage – Family – Children] 10 Article 7 [School system] 10 Article 8 [Freedom of assembly] 10 Article 9 [Freedom of association] 11 Article 10 [Privacy of correspondence, posts and telecommunications] 11 Article 11 [Freedom of movement] 11 Article 12 [Occupational freedom] 11 Article 12a [Compulsory military and alternative civilian service] 12 Article 13 [Inviolability of the home] 12 Article 14 [Property – Inheritance – Expropriation] 13 Article 15 [Socialisation] 13 Article 16 [Citizenship – Extradition] 14 Article 16a [Right of asylum] 14 Article 17 [Right of petition] 14 Article 17a [Restriction of basic rights in specific instances] 15 Article 18 [Forfeiture of basic rights] 15 Article 19 [Restriction of basic rights – Legal remedies] 15 II. THE FEDERATION AND THE LÄNDER 16 Article 20 [Constitutional principles – Right of resistance] 16 Article 20a [Protection of the natural foundations of life and animals] 16 Article 21 [Political parties] 16 Article 22 [Federal capital – Federal flag] 16 Article 23 [European Union – Protection of basic rights – Principle of subsidiarity] 16 Article 24 [Transfer of sovereign powers – System of collective security] 17 Article 25 [Primacy of international law] 18 Article 26 [Securing international peace] 18 Article 27 [Merchant fleet] 18 Article 28 [Land constitutions – Autonomy of municipalities] 18 Article 29 [New delimitation of the federal territory] 18 Article 30 [Sovereign powers of the Länder] 20 Article 31 [Supremacy of federal law] 20 Article 32 [Foreign relations] 20 Article 33 [Equal citizenship – Public service] 20 Article 34 [Liability for violation of official duty] 20 Article 35 [Legal and administrative assistance and assistance during disasters] 21 Article 36 [Personnel of federal authorities] 21 Article 37 [Federal execution] 21 III. THE BUNDESTAG 22 Article 38 [Elections] 22 Article 39 [Electoral term – Convening] 22 Article 40 [Presidency – Rules of procedure] 22 Article 41 [Scrutiny of elections] 22 Article 42 [Public sittings – Majority decisions] 22 Article 43 [Right to require presence, right of access and right to be heard] 23 Article 44 [Committees of inquiry] 23 Article 45 [Committee on the European Union] 23 Article 45a [Committees on Foreign Affairs and Defence] 23 Article 45b [Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces] 24 Article 45c [Petitions Committee] 24 Article 46 [Immunities of Members] 24 Article 47 [Right of refusal to give evidence] 24 Article 48 [Candidature – Protection of membership – Remuneration] 25 Article 49 [Repealed] 25 IV. THE BUNDESRAT 26 Article 50 [Functions] 26 Article 51 [Composition – Weighted voting] 26 Article 52 [President – Decisions – Rules of procedure] 26 Article 53 [Attendance of members of the Federal Government] 26 IVa. THE JOINT COMMITTEE 27 Article 53a [Composition – Rules of procedure] 27 V. THE FEDERAL PRESIDENT 28 Article 54 [Election – Term of office] 28 Article 55 [Incompatibilities] 28 Article 56 [Oath of office] 28 Article 57 [Substitution] 29 Article 58 [Countersignature] 29 Article 59 [Representation of the Federation for the purposes of international law] 29 Article 59a [Repealed] 29 Article 60 [Appointment of civil servants – Pardon – Immunity] 29 Article 61 [Impeachment before the Federal Constitutional Court] 30 VI. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 31 Article 62 [Composition] 31 Article 63 [Election of the Federal Chancellor] 31 Article 64 [Appointment and dismissal of Federal Ministers – Oath of office] 31 Article 65 [Power to determine policy guidelines – Department and collegiate responsibility] 31 Article 65a [Command of the Armed Forces] 32 Article 66 [Incompatibilities] 32 Article 67 [Vote of no confidence] 32 Article 68 [Vote of confidence] 32 Article 69 [Deputy Federal Chancellor – Term of office] 32 VII. FEDERAL LEGISLATION AND LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURES 33 Article 70 [Division of powers between the Federation and the Länder] 33 Article 71 [Exclusive legislative power of the Federation] 33 Article 72 [Concurrent legislative powers] 33 Article 73 [Matters under exclusive legislative power of the Federation] 34 Article 74 [Matters under concurrent legislative powers] 35 Article 74a [Repealed] 36 Article 75 [Repealed] 36 Article 76 [Bills] 36 Article 77 [Legislative procedure – Mediation Committee] 37 Article 78 [Passage of federal laws] 37 Article 79 [Amendment of the Basic Law] 38 Article 80 [Issuance of statutory instruments] 38 Article 80a [State of tension] 38 Article 81 [Legislative emergency] 39 Article 82 [Certification – Promulgation – Entry into force] 39 VIII. THE EXECUTION OF FEDERAL LAWS AND THE FEDERAL ADMINISTRATION 40 Article 83 [Execution by the Länder] 40 Article 84 [Länder administration – Federal oversight] 40 Article 85 [Execution by the Länder on federal commission] 40 Article 86 [Federal administration] 41 Article 87 [Matters] 41 Article 87a [Armed Forces] 42 Article 87b [Federal Defence Administration] 42 Article 87c [Production and utilisation of nuclear energy] 42 Article 87d [Air transport administration] 43 Article 87e [Rail transport administration] 43 Article 87f [Posts and telecommunications] 43 Article 88 [The Federal Bank – The European Central Bank] 44 Article 89 [Federal waterways – Administration of waterways] 44 Article 90 [Federal highways] 44 Article 91 [Internal emergency] 44 VIIIa. JOINT TASKS 46 Article 91a [Joint tasks – Responsibility for expenditure] 46 Article 91b [Education programmes and promotion of research] 46 IX. THE JUDICIARY 47 Article 92 [Court organisation] 47 Article 93 [Jurisdiction of the Federal Constitutional Court] 47 Article 94 [Composition of the Federal Constitutional Court] 48 Article 95 [Supreme federal courts] 48 Article 96 [Other federal courts] 48 Article 97 [Judicial independence] 49 Article 98 [Legal status of judges – Impeachment] 49 Article 99 [Constitutional disputes within a Land] 49 Article 100 [Concrete judicial review] 49 Article 101 [Ban on extraordinary courts] 50 Article 102 [Abolition of capital punishment] 50 Article 103 [Fair trial] 50 Article 104 [Deprivation of liberty] 50 X. FINANCE 52 Article 104a [Apportionment of expenditures – Financial system – Liability] 52 Article 104b [Financial assistance for investments] 52 Article 105 [Distribution of powers regarding tax laws] 53 Article 106 [Apportionment of tax revenue and yield of fiscal monopolies] 53 Article 106a [Federal grants for local mass transit] 55 Article 107 [Distribution of tax revenue – Financial equalisation among the Länder – Supplementary grants] 55 Article 108 [Financial administration of the Federation and the Länder – Financial courts] 55 Article 109 [Budget management in the Federation and the Länder] 56 Article 110 [Federal budget] 57 Article 111 [Interim budget management] 57 Article 112 [Extrabudgetary expenditures] 58 Article 113 [Increase of expenditures] 58 Article 114 [Submission and auditing of accounts] 58 Article 115 [Limits of borrowing] 58 Xa. STATE OF DEFENCE 60 Article 115a [Declaration of state of defence] 60 Article 115b [Power of command of the Federal Chancellor] 60 Article 115c [Extension of the legislative powers of the Federation] 60 Article 115d [Urgent bills] 61 Article 115e [Joint Committee] 61 Article 115f [Use of Federal Border Police – Extended powers of instruction] 61 Article 115g [Federal Constitutional Court] 62 Article 115h [Expiry of electoral terms and terms of office] 62 Article 115i [Powers of the Land governments] 62 Article 115k [Rank and duration of emergency provisions] 63 Article 115l [Repeal of emergency measures – Conclusion of peace] 63 XI. TRANSITIONAL AND CONCLUDING PROVISIONS 64 Article 116 [Definition of “German” – Restoration of citizenship] 64 Article 117 [Suspended entry into force of two basic rights] 64 Article 118 [New delimitation of Baden and Württemberg] 64 Article 118a [New delimitation of Berlin and Brandenburg] 64 Article 119 [Refugees and expellees] 64 Article 120 [Occupation costs – Burdens resulting from the war] 65 Article 120a [Equalisation of burdens] 65 Article 121 [Definition of “majority of the members”] 65 Article 122 [Date of transmission of legislative powers] 66 Article 123 [Continued applicability of pre-existing law] 66 Article 124 [Continued applicability of law within the scope of exclusive legislative power] 66 Article 125 [Continued applicability of law within the scope of
Recommended publications
  • Croatia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments Through 2010
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:24 constituteproject.org Croatia's Constitution of 1991 with Amendments through 2010 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:24 Table of contents I. Historical Foundations . 3 II. Basic Provisions . 4 III. Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms . 7 1. General Provisions . 7 2. Personal and Political Freedoms and Rights . 9 3. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights . 14 IV. Organization of Government . 18 1. The Croatian Parliament . 18 2. The President of the Republic of Croatia . 22 3. The Government of the Republic of Croatia . 26 4. Judicial Power . 28 5. The Office of the Public Prosecutions . 30 V. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia . 31 VI. Local and Regional Self-Government . 33 VII. International Relations . 35 1. International agreements . 35 2. Association and Succession . 35 VIII. European Union . 36 1. Legal Grounds for Membership and Transfer of Constitutional Powers . 36 2. Participation in European Union Institutions . 36 3. European Union Law . 37 4. Rights of European Union Citizens . 37 IX. Amending the Constitution . 37 IX. Concluding Provisions . 38 Croatia 1991 (rev. 2010) Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:24 I. Historical Foundations • Reference to country's history The millenary identity of the Croatia nation and the continuity of its statehood,
    [Show full text]
  • Open-And-Shut: Senate Impeachment Deliberations Must Be Public Marjorie Cohn
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 51 | Issue 2 Article 3 1-2000 Open-and-Shut: Senate Impeachment Deliberations Must Be Public Marjorie Cohn Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Marjorie Cohn, Open-and-Shut: Senate Impeachment Deliberations Must Be Public, 51 Hastings L.J. 365 (2000). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol51/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Open-and-Shut: Senate Impeachment Deliberations Must Be Public by MARJORIE COHN* Table of Contents I. Impeachment Rules and Precedents ................................................ 368 A. Current Impeachment Rules ............................................... 368 B. A Tradition of Senate Secrecy ............................................ 370 (1) Congressional Rule-Making Authority ........................ 370 (2) The "Closed-Door Policy"............................................. 370 (3) The Twentieth Century: The Door Opens Wider ...... 374 (4) When the Doors Are Closed ......................................... 376 C. Historical Impeachment Rules ............................................ 377 D. Why Did the Presumption of Openness Change in .. 1868 with the Andrew Johnson Impeachment?
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic and Political Situation in Croatia
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT D: BUDGETARY AFFAIRS The Economic and Political Situation in Croatia NOTE 08/06/2010 PE 411.280 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control. AUTHOR Ms Yana Mechkova RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Mr Christian EHLERS Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: poldep- [email protected] Manuscript completed in June 2010. Brussels, © European Parliament, 2010. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. The Economic and Political Situation in Croatia ___________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 2 2. THE POLITICAL SITUATION............................................................................. 2 2.1. THE POLITICAL STRUCTURE...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal of Republic of Germany Is a Democratic and Social Federal
    The Federal Republic of Germany Jutta Kramer The Federal Republic of Germany “is a democratic and social federal state” (Basic Law, Art. 20I). It was founded in 1949, after the Western Allies gave the prime ministers of the Länder (i.e., the constituent states), which were reestablished after the Second World War, the task of drafting a new constitution with a federal character in order to prevent a strong central state from arising in Germany again. However, the federal order in Germany does not follow the example of the United States Constitution, which emphasizes a division of powers between governments, but rather the German tradition, which is characterized by mutual connections, interconnections, and overlapping of the centralized and decentralized state units.1 When it was founded, the Federal Republic of Germany consisted of 11 Länder (without Berlin, which was a city-state under Allied control) that did not conform to the boundaries of the former Weimar Republic. Since reunification in 1990, Germany has consisted of 16 Länder, including three city-states: Hamburg, Bremen, and Berlin. Germany’s population is spread across 357,000 square kilometres. The highest population density is in Berlin, which has 3,800 inhabitants per square kilometre; the lowest is in the Land Brandenburg, which has only 88 inhabitants per square kilometre. Länder sizes differ considerably as well. The smallest Land, Bremen, consisting of two cities (Bremen and Bremerhaven), has 680,000 inhabitants; the largest Land, North Rhine-Westphalia, has more than 17.9 million inhabitants. The ethnicity of Germany’s population of 82.1 million people is largely homogeneous.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany (1950-2018)
    Germany Self-rule INSTITUTIONAL DEPTH AND POLICY SCOPE Germany has two-tiered regional governance consisting of sixteen Länder and (Land)Kreise. Several Länder have a third tier between these two, Regierungsbezirke (administrative districts). Two Länder have a fourth tier of regional governance, Landschaftsverbände in North-Rhine Westphalia and Bezirksverband Pfalz in Rhineland-Palatinate.1 The 1949 Basic Law of the German Federal Republic granted eleven Länder extensive competences, which include legislative powers for culture, education, universities, broadcasting/television, local government, and the police (C 1949, Art. 74; Council of Europe: Germany 1999; Hrbek 2002; Swenden 2006; Watts 1999a, 2008). Länder also exercise residual competences (C 1949, Art. 70). In addition, the Basic Law states that Länder are responsible for the implementation of most federal laws (C 1949, Arts. 83–85). The federal government may legislate to preserve legal and economic unity with respect to justice, social welfare, civil law, criminal law, labor law, and economic law (C 1949, Art 72.2), and it has authority to establish the legislative framework in higher education, the press, environmental protection, and spatial planning (C 1949, Art. 72.3; Reutter 2006). The federal government exercises sole legislative authority over foreign policy, defense, currency, and public services (C 1949, Art. 73; Council of Europe: Germany 1999; Hrbek 2002; Swenden 2006; Watts 1999a, 2008). It also has exclusive authority over immigration and citizenship (C 1949, Arts. 73.2 and 73.3), though Länder administer inter-Land immigration and have concurrent competence on residence (Bendel and Sturm 2010: 186-187; C 1949, Arts. 74.4 and 74.6).2 However, this is not enough to qualify for the maximum score on policy scope.β The constitutional division of authority was extended to the five new Länder after unification in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines's Constitution of 1987
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:44 constituteproject.org Philippines's Constitution of 1987 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:44 Table of contents Preamble . 3 ARTICLE I: NATIONAL TERRITORY . 3 ARTICLE II: DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES PRINCIPLES . 3 ARTICLE III: BILL OF RIGHTS . 6 ARTICLE IV: CITIZENSHIP . 9 ARTICLE V: SUFFRAGE . 10 ARTICLE VI: LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT . 10 ARTICLE VII: EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT . 17 ARTICLE VIII: JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT . 22 ARTICLE IX: CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS . 26 A. COMMON PROVISIONS . 26 B. THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION . 28 C. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS . 29 D. THE COMMISSION ON AUDIT . 32 ARTICLE X: LOCAL GOVERNMENT . 33 ARTICLE XI: ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS . 37 ARTICLE XII: NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY . 41 ARTICLE XIII: SOCIAL JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS . 45 ARTICLE XIV: EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ARTS, CULTURE, AND SPORTS . 49 ARTICLE XV: THE FAMILY . 53 ARTICLE XVI: GENERAL PROVISIONS . 54 ARTICLE XVII: AMENDMENTS OR REVISIONS . 56 ARTICLE XVIII: TRANSITORY PROVISIONS . 57 Philippines 1987 Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:44 • Source of constitutional authority • General guarantee of equality Preamble • God or other deities • Motives for writing constitution • Preamble We, the sovereign Filipino people, imploring the aid of Almighty God, in order to build a just and humane society and establish a Government that shall embody our ideals and aspirations, promote the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and secure to ourselves and our posterity the blessings of independence and democracy under the rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace, do ordain and promulgate this Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Commander's Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol
    Headquarters Army in Europe United States Army, Europe, and Seventh Army Pamphlet 360-6* United States Army Installation Management Agency Europe Region Office Heidelberg, Germany 20 September 2005 Public Affairs Commanders Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol *This pamphlet supersedes USAREUR Pamphlet 360-6, 8 March 2000. For the CG, USAREUR/7A: E. PEARSON Colonel, GS Deputy Chief of Staff Official: GARY C. MILLER Regional Chief Information Officer - Europe Summary. This pamphlet should be used as a guide for commanders new to Germany. It provides basic information concerning German society and customs. Applicability. This pamphlet applies primarily to commanders serving their first tour in Germany. It also applies to public affairs officers and protocol officers. Forms. AE and higher-level forms are available through the Army in Europe Publishing System (AEPUBS). Records Management. Records created as a result of processes prescribed by this publication must be identified, maintained, and disposed of according to AR 25-400-2. Record titles and descriptions are available on the Army Records Information Management System website at https://www.arims.army.mil. Suggested Improvements. The proponent of this pamphlet is the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI, DSN 370-6447). Users may suggest improvements to this pamphlet by sending DA Form 2028 to the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI), Unit 29351, APO AE 09014-9351. Distribution. B (AEPUBS) (Germany only). 1 AE Pam 360-6 ● 20 Sep 05 CONTENTS Section I INTRODUCTION 1. Purpose 2. References 3. Explanation of Abbreviations 4. General Section II GETTING STARTED 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impeachment and Trial of a Former President
    Legal Sidebari The Impeachment and Trial of a Former President January 15, 2021 For the second time in just over a year, the House of Representatives has voted to impeach President Donald J. Trump. The House previously voted to impeach President Trump on December 18, 2019, and the Senate voted to acquit the President on February 5, 2020. Because the timing of this second impeachment vote is so close to the end of the Trump Administration, it is possible that any resulting Senate trial may not occur until after President Trump leaves office on January 20, 2021. This possibility has prompted the question of whether the Senate can try a former President for conduct that occurred while he was in office. The Constitution’s Impeachment Provisions The Constitution grants Congress authority to impeach and remove the President, Vice President, and other federal “civil Officers” for treason, bribery, or “other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” Impeachment is one of the various checks and balances created by the Constitution, and it serves as a powerful tool for holding government officers accountable. The impeachment process entails two distinct proceedings carried out by the separate houses of Congress. First, a simple majority of the House impeaches—or formally approves allegations of wrongdoing amounting to an impeachable offense. The second proceeding is an impeachment trial in the Senate. If the Senate votes to convict with a two-thirds majority, the official is removed from office. The Senate also can disqualify an official upon conviction from holding a federal office in the future; according to Senate practice, this vote follows the vote for conviction.
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment As Judicial Selection?
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 18 (2009-2010) Issue 3 Article 3 March 2010 Impeachment as Judicial Selection? Tuan Samahon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Courts Commons, and the Judges Commons Repository Citation Tuan Samahon, Impeachment as Judicial Selection?, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 595 (2010), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol18/iss3/3 Copyright c 2010 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj IMPEACHMENT AS JUDICIAL SELECTION? Tuan Samahon* Ideological judicial selection encompasses more than the affirmative nominating, confirming, and appointing of judges who pre-commit to particular legal interpretations and constructions of constitutional text. It may also include deselection by way of im- peachment and removal (or at least its threat) of judges subscribing to interpretations and constructions of the Constitution that one disapproves. This negative tactic may be particularly effective when deployed against judges on closely divided collegial courts, such as the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. courts of appeals, where per- sonnel determine voting majorities and, in turn, majorities determine case outcomes. The Pickering-Chase, Fortas-Douglas, and Christian Coalition impeachments and threats of impeachment illustrate that the use or threat of this tactic is more common than might be supposed. Indeed, recent calls for the removal of Circuit Judge Jay Bybee demonstrate the continuing allure of impeachment as judicial selection. This Article examines the phenomenon of impeachment as judicial selection through Professors Tushnet’s and Balkin’s framework of “constitutional hardball.” In the case of impeachment as judicial selection, Congress plays constitutional hardball by claiming that it is an appropriate tool for political control and a fraternal twin to the modern appointments process.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210106111314445 Gohmert V Pence Stay Appl Signed.Pdf
    No. __A__________ In the Supreme Court of the United States LOUIE GOHMERT, TYLER BOWYER, NANCY COTTLE, JAKE HOFFMAN, ANTHONY KERN, JAMES R. LAMON, SAM MOORHEAD, ROBERT MONTGOMERY, LORAINE PELLEGRINO, GREG SAFSTEN, KELLI WARD AND MICHAEL WARD, Applicants, v. THE HONORABLE MICHAEL R. PENCE, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY. Respondent. EMERGENCY APPLICATION TO THE HONORABLE SAMUEL A. ALITO AS CIRCUIT JUSTICE FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAY AND INTERIM RELIEF PENDING RESOLUTION OF A TIMELY FILED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI William L. Sessions Sidney Powell* Texas Bar No. 18041500 Texas Bar No. 16209700 SESSIONS & ASSOCIATES, PLLC SIDNEY POWELL, P.C. 14591 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 400 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1100 Dallas, TX 75254 Dallas, TX 72519 Tel: (214) 217-8855 Tel: (214) 628-9514 Fax: (214) 723-5346 Fax: (214) 628-9505 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Lawrence J. Joseph Howard Kleinhendler DC Bar #464777 NY Bar No. 2657120 LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE J. JOSEPH HOWARD KLEINHENDLER ESQUIRE 1250 Connecticut Av NW, Ste 700 369 Lexington Ave., 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 New York, New York 10017 Tel: (202) 355-9452 Tel: (917) 793-1188 Fax: (202) 318-2254 Fax: (732) 901-0832 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Counsel for Applicants * Counsel of Record PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Applicants (plaintiffs-appellants below) are U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-1), Tyler Bowyer, Nancy Cottle, Jake Hoffman, Anthony Kern, James R. Lamon, Sam Moorhead, Robert Montgomery, Loraine Pellegrino, Greg Safsten, Kelli Ward, and Michael Ward. Respondent (defendant-appellee below) is the Honorable Michael R.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Years German Basic Law: the German Constitution and Its Court
    60 Years German Basic Law: The German Constitution and its Court Landmark Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany in the Area of Fundamental Rights Jürgen Bröhmer, Clauspeter Hill & Marc Spitzkatz (Eds.) 2nd Edition Edited by Suhainah Wahiduddin LLB Hons (Anglia) Published by The Malaysian Current Law Journal Sdn Bhd E1-2, Jalan Selaman 1/2, Dataran Palma, 68000 Ampang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia [Co No 51143 M] Tel: 603-42705400 Fax: 603-42705401 2012 © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Berlin / Germany. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any material form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. The following parts have been published earlier under the copyright of: © Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden / Germany Cases no. IV. 2 a) School Prayer, IV. 2 b) Classroom Crucifix, V. 2 d) First Broadcasting Decision and XV. a) and b) Solange I and II. Published in: Decisions of the Bundesverfassungsgericht - Federal Constitutional Court - Federal Republic of Germany, Vol. 1, 2 and 4, Baden-Baden 1993-2007. © Donald P. Kommers Case no. II. 1 a) Elfes, published in: Donald P. Kommers, The Constitutional of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2nd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018/19 of the German Council of Economic Experts (GCEE)
    1 © 2019 Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability Goethe University Frankfurt House of Finance Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 3 60323 Frankfurt am Main Tel.:+49 (0)69 798-33805 www.imfs-frankfurt.de PHOTOS IMFS / Hannelore Förster, German Council of Economic Experts, Hoover Institution / Tim Griffith, Kronberger Kreis DESIGN www.werbe-freiheit.com 2 Table of Contents 5 Highlights 2018 10 Institute and Staff 11 I. The Institute 15 II. The IMFS in Numbers 16 III. Macroeconomic Model Comparison Initiative (MMCI) 18 IV. External Research Funding 21 V. Member of the European Banking Institute 22 VI. The Researchers 35 VII. Organization Chart 36 Conversations with IMFS Researchers and Alumni 42 Teaching Concept and Activities 51 Publications and Presentations 52 I. IMFS Working Papers 54 II. IMFS Interdisciplinary Studies 55 III. Publications 60 IV. Speeches and Conference Presentations 67 Events 69 I. Conferences 82 II. Working Lunches 86 II. Distinguished Lectures 88 Research-Based Policy Advice 91 Public Outreach and Press 3 Editorial Dear friends of the IMFS, Having obtained financing for another 10-year At the same time, this open platform, where period in the preceding year, the IMFS made scientists can share formulas and code and another leap forward in 2018: Roland Broemel replicate models, represents the nucleus of and Alexander Meyer-Gohde were appointed a key international research initiative: the as IMFS professors and now contribute their Macroeconomic Model Comparison Initiative expertise in public law and financial regulation (MMCI), a joint project led by the Hoover and in macroeconomics and financial markets, Institution at Stanford University and the IMFS.
    [Show full text]