History and Current Status of Sitka Black-Tailed Deer in the Kodiak Archipelago

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History and Current Status of Sitka Black-Tailed Deer in the Kodiak Archipelago History and Current Status of Sitka Black-tailed Deer in the Kodiak Archipelago by Roger B. Smith Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Kodiak I vwwduc.:Uo n. In the Kodiak Archipelago, populations of the introduced Sitka black-tailed deer (Odoco~e~ hemion~ ~~keno~) inhabit vegetative associations quite distinct from deer ranges in the rest of Alaska. Deer populations are still expanding into pre­ viously unoccupied or lightly occupied ranges. Concurrent with this range expansion, a decline in the population in areas first occupied by deer is evident. The direction of deer management has evolved from a protective phase, through a conservative phase, and into an exploitive phase as deer populations have expanded. This paper will re­ f view the history of the transplant and subsequent pattern of occupation of the Kodiak Archipelago by deer. Deer/habitat relationships, natural mortality, harvest patterns, and management problems will also be discussed. V~~p~on aS ~ea--Karlstrom [1969] provides an accurate description of the topography, climate, and geology of the Kodiak Archipelago. The Archipelago is a ( group of islands extending 177 miles in a southwesterly direction off the southern tip of the Kenai Peninsula (fig. 1). The area is mountainous with maximum elevations above 4,000 feet. The 2 largest islands, Kodiak and Afognak, are characterized by steep bluffs descending into numerous long glacially-scoured straits and fiords. The islands in the Archipelago cover an area of approximately 5,000 square miles. Seldom do temperatures fall below 0° F and average annual precipitation is about 60 inches, although much local variation in rainfall and temperature occurs. l The vegetation of the Kodiak Archipelago can be classified into 3 major types. Batchelor [1965] describes the Sitka spruce (P~cea ~~tcheno~) type which covers Afognak, Shuyak, Raspberry, and much of northeastern Kodiak Island. tf,ost of Kodiak Island is dominated by a grass-brush type. Alder (A!n.~ ~~nuata) stands are inter­ spersed with dense meadows of salmonberry (Rub~ ~pectabJ~) and grass (Ca!amag~o~~ canadeno~). Cottonwood (Popu£~ bc~ami{\e~a) and birch (Betula kenaica) occupy valleys and lower foothills. Approximately the southwestern quarter of Kodiak is occupied by tundra vegetation of willows (S~x spp.) and heath plants, including 184 c 0 UGANIK CHINIAK PENINSULA KODIAK ISLAND 185 Figure 1. Location map of major islands in Kodiak Archipelago, Alaska. crowberry (Empetnum n{g~um), bearberry (Aketohzaphyloh uva-unhi) and low cranberry (Vac.un{um vUM-idaea). Hu"lten [1969] described this vegetative type in detail. H~zony o6 ~al1./.}plant and popula:Uon ~endo--Fourteen deer, captured in the Sitka area, were released in 1924 on Long Island, about 4 miles east of the town of Kodiak [Burris and McKnight, 1973]. Two more deer were placed there in 1930. A small popu­ la~ion of deer became established on this spruce-forested island approximately 3 square miles in area. Although reports are sketchy, apparently it was intended that deer moving from Long Island would eventually stock Kodiak Island. Long Island is separated from Kodiak's mainland by some smaller islands and deer would have to swim a maximum of 1 mile between adjacent islands. A 1931 Alaska Game Commission report mentioned that 3 does and 2 bucks had been seen on Kodiak. An additional transplant seemed appropriate and in 1934 4 bucks and 5 does were released on Kodiak Island. If the 1931 Game Commission report was accurate, deer had probably already become estab­ lished on Kodiak when the 1934 transplant was accomplished. The Long Island deer population was estimated at 80 deer in 1938, according to Palmer [Rhode, 1948]. Jack Benson, Wildlife Agent in Kodiak, in a March, 1941 letter to the Alaska Game Commission, detailed a proposal to move the Long Island deer herd to Afognak Island in anticipation of planned military fortification which, he felt, would doom the Long Island deer herd. The transplant was not initiated and deer were reduced to a low level when the Island was occupied by extensive military install­ ations during the 1940s. Only an occasional straggler occupies Long Island today as cattle grazing, maturation of the spruce forest, and high recreational use of the Island have seriously diminished the habitat. Back on Kodiak's mainland, the 1940s found deer rapidly occupying the north­ eastern corner of the Island. By 1950, deer were quite common near the town of Kodiak and the first hunting season was held in 1953. During that ~-day August season, 200 hunters took 38 bucks, mostly from the Chiniak Bay drainages. According to Chapados [1953], deer populations were still increasing on northeastern Kodiak in the early 1950s. While the nucleus of the population inhabited the Chiniak Peninsula and Chiniak Bay drainages, deer had already moved as far south and west as Ugak Bay, Terror Bay, and Uganik Island. Reports of deer on Whale, Raspberry, Afognak, and Shuyak Islands were becoming more common. Hoffman [1953] reported the first observa­ tion of deer wintering in the Pasagshak Bay area in 1953. During the 1952-1953 winter, 11 deer were found dead of apparent malnutrition on the Chiniak Peninsula [Hoffman, 1953]. The same report stated that the browse on the winter ranges did not appear overutilized. The first season in 1953 followed the first reported significant mortality from winter starvation. The remainder of the 1950s decade was marked by a rapidly increasing population .1 spreading southward along Kodiak Island. In 1958, 25 percent of the harvest was taken in areas remote from the road system on northeastern Kodiak [Troyer, 1958]. By 1955, Troyer [1955] estimated that half the deer population was found outside the road system drainages. Although Troyer then opined that either-sex hunting would probably constitute good management, it wasn't until 1959 that a 3-day doe hunt was held. The annual harvest continued to increase as seasons became more liberal and deer popu­ lations expanded. The average annual harvest during the 1957-1959 period was about 200 bucks. 186 Whether by coincidence or consequence, the estimated Kodiak deer harvest nearly doubled when the State of Alaska assumed administration of its wildlife in 1960. A trend toward liberalization of harvest in the 1960s began when the bag limit was raised to 2 deer in 1960. Bathelor [1962] observed that the major deer ranges occupied by the early 1960s were in the Sitka spruce climax forest of northeastern Kodiak and nearby islands. He observed that deer were found nearly exclusively in the spruce zone in bad weather. He felt that spruce cover was a primary requirement for establishing substantial deer populations, although acknowledging that Uganik Island, a relatively sparsely forested area, was already one of the major deer winter ranges. Merriam [1964] reported that, by 1963, the deer population in the Chiniak Bay drainages had declined appreciably, despite a series of apparently mild winters and little observed mortality other than from hunting. In 1960, 41 percent of the harvest was recorded from the drainages along the road system between Kalsin and Women's Bays and this had declined to only 7 percent in 1962. Merriam felt that overhunting may have contributed to the decline and that areas without spruce forests were more likely to be overharvested. Erickson [1958] observed that competition between deer and cattle was occurring near the ocean fringe in the Chiniak Bay drainages. The lowlands near the ocean became critical range during periods of heavy snow cover. Erickson noted that willow (Salix spp.) and blueberry (Va~c{n{um ovaliflo~um), prime deer browse species, were also browsed heavily by cattle. He believed that cattle were primarily responsible for range deterioration. Recognizing that limited winter range was pro­ bably responsible in part for the decline, and observing that populations were build­ ing in other areas, Erickson recommended instituting an either-sex season encompassing the month of December, when deer would be vulnerable to hunting. A record estimated harvest of 1,040 deer occurred in 1965 during a season extend­ ing from August through December 31. Over 400 deer (42 percent) were taken on the Chiniak Peninsula excluding the Kalsin Bay-Women's Bay drainages where the population had declined and had a more restrictive season. Another harvest record was set in 1967 when an estimated 1,500 deer were taken following a winter with only light natural mortality. The following year, the harvest rose to 2,100, with 50 percent of the harvest from the Chiniak Peninsula; the Chiniak Peninsula was probably at a population high then and has subsequently declined. The Chiniak Peninsula area today has the best deer population in the part of northeastern Kodiak Island accessible by road, but is still far below the mid-1960s level, despite relatively light hunting pressure. Much of the Chiniak Peninsula is only lightly grazed by cattle compared to the drainages in which the early-l960s decline was recorded. Extreme browsing of willow by deer is apparent along the ocean fringe wintering areas where cattle use is lighter or non-existent. Overall range quality has undoubtedly declined to well below the former carrying capacity. During the 1969-1970 winters, unusually severe cold and heavy snows resulted in heavy mortality from starvation. Despite the low deer population, hunters took 870 and 915 deer following those respective winters. Although 54 percent of the harvest in 1971 came from the area accessible by road, hunters were taking deer on Afognak, Raspberry, Whale and Uganik Islands and about 10 percent of the harvest occurred even further south on Kodiak Island. A general upward trend in the Game Management Unit 8 deer population has occurred since the 1970-1971 winter. During the past decade deer have populated most of the available deer habitat on Kodiak, Afognak and adjacent islands.
Recommended publications
  • Bathymetry and Geomorphology of Shelikof Strait and the Western Gulf of Alaska
    geosciences Article Bathymetry and Geomorphology of Shelikof Strait and the Western Gulf of Alaska Mark Zimmermann 1,* , Megan M. Prescott 2 and Peter J. Haeussler 3 1 National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Seattle, WA 98115, USA 2 Lynker Technologies, Under contract to Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA 98115, USA; [email protected] 3 U.S. Geological Survey, 4210 University Dr., Anchorage, AK 99058, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-206-526-4119 Received: 22 May 2019; Accepted: 19 September 2019; Published: 21 September 2019 Abstract: We defined the bathymetry of Shelikof Strait and the western Gulf of Alaska (WGOA) from the edges of the land masses down to about 7000 m deep in the Aleutian Trench. This map was produced by combining soundings from historical National Ocean Service (NOS) smooth sheets (2.7 million soundings); shallow multibeam and LIDAR (light detection and ranging) data sets from the NOS and others (subsampled to 2.6 million soundings); and deep multibeam (subsampled to 3.3 million soundings), single-beam, and underway files from fisheries research cruises (9.1 million soundings). These legacy smooth sheet data, some over a century old, were the best descriptor of much of the shallower and inshore areas, but they are superseded by the newer multibeam and LIDAR, where available. Much of the offshore area is only mapped by non-hydrographic single-beam and underway files. We combined these disparate data sets by proofing them against their source files, where possible, in an attempt to preserve seafloor features for research purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Kodiak Alutiiq Heritage Thematic Units Grades K-5
    Kodiak Alutiiq Heritage Thematic Units Grades K-5 Prepared by Native Village of Afognak In partnership with: Chugachmiut, Inc. Kodiak Island Borough School District Alutiiq Museum & Archaeological Repository Native Educators of the Alutiiq Region (NEAR) KMXT Radio Station Administration for Native Americans (ANA) U.S. Department of Education Access additional resources at: http://www.afognak.org/html/education.php Copyright © 2009 Native Village of Afognak First Edition Produced through an Administration for Native Americans (ANA) Grant Number 90NL0413/01 Reprint of edited curriculum units from the Chugachmiut Thematic Units Books, developed by the Chugachmiut Culture and Language Department, Donna Malchoff, Director through a U.S. Department of Education, Alaska Native Education Grant Number S356A50023. Publication Layout & Design by Alisha S. Drabek Edited by Teri Schneider & Alisha S. Drabek Printed by Kodiak Print Master LLC Illustrations: Royalty Free Clipart accessed at clipart.com, ANKN Clipart, Image Club Sketches Collections, and drawings by Alisha Drabek on pages 16, 19, 51 and 52. Teachers may copy portions of the text for use in the classroom. Available online at www.afognak.org/html/education.php Orders, inquiries, and correspondence can be addressed to: Native Village of Afognak 115 Mill Bay Road, Suite 201 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 (907) 486-6357 www.afognak.org Quyanaasinaq Chugachmiut, Inc., Kodiak Island Borough School District and the Native Education Curriculum Committee, Alutiiq Museum, KMXT Radio Station, & the following Kodiak Contributing Teacher Editors: Karly Gunderson Kris Johnson Susan Patrick Kathy Powers Teri Schneider Sabrina Sutton Kodiak Alutiiq Heritage Thematic Units Access additional resources at: © 2009 Native Village of Afognak http://www.afognak.org/html/education.php Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Unit 4: Russian’s Arrival (3rd Grade) 42 Kodiak Alutiiq Values 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Assessment, Ecology and Trophic Relationships of Steller Sea Liorq in the Gulf of Alaska
    Al'lNUAL REPORT Contract #03-5-022-69 Research Unit #243 1 April 1978 - 31 Marc~ 1979 Pages: Population Assessment, Ecology and Trophic Relationships of Steller Sea LiorQ in the Gulf of Alaska Principal Investigators: Donald Calkins, Marine Mammal Biologist Kenneth Pitcher, Marine ~~mmal Biologist Alaska Department of Fish and Game 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Assisted by: Karl Schneider Dennis McAllister Walt Cunningham Susan Stanford Dave Johnson Louise Smith Paul Smith Nancy Murray TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction. • . i Steller Sea lions in the Gulf of Alaska (by Donald Calkins). 3 Breeding Rookeries and Hauling Areas . 3 I. Surveys • . 3 II. Pup counts. 4 Distribution and Movements . 10 Sea Otter Distribution and Abundance in the Southern Kodiak Archipelago and the Semidi Islands (by Karl Schneider). • • • • 24 Summary •••••• 24 Introduction • • • 25 Kodiak Archipelago 26 Background • • • • . 26 Methods•.•••. 27 Results and discussion • • • • • . 28 1. Distribution••• 30 2. Population size •••••. 39 3. Status. 40 4. Future. 41 Semidi Islands 43 Background • • 43 Methods ••••••••• 43 Results and discussion • 44 Belukha Whales in Lower Cook Inlet (by Nancy Murray) . • • • • • 47 Distribution and Abundance • 47 Habitat••..•••• 50 Population Dynamics •• 54 Food Habits•••••.••. 56 Behavior • . 58 Literature Cited. 59 Introduction This project is a detailed study of the population dynamics, life history and some aspects of the ecology of the Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus). In addition to the sea lion investigations, the work has been expanded to include an examination of the distribution and abundance of belukha whales (Detphinapterus Zeu~dS) in Cook Inlet and the distribution and abundance of sea otters (Enhydra lutris) near the south end of the Kodiak Archipelago.
    [Show full text]
  • Stacy Studebaker P.O
    Stacy Studebaker P.O. Box 970 Kodiak, AK 99615 (907) 486-6498 email: [email protected] PROFILE A highly creative, energetic individual, dedicated environmental educator and conservationist who thrives on wild places and natural history. Kodiak, Alaska has been Stacy’s home since 1980. She was born in La Jolla California in 1947 and grew up in Bronxville, New York and Woodside, California. After getting her Bachelor’s Degree, she worked in Yosemite National Park, Glacier Bay National Park, and Katmai National Park. She returned to college in 1977 and earned a Master’s in Science Teaching degree before moving to Kodiak Alaska where she taught high school biology until she retired in 2000. She has lived in Alaska for the last 35 years. EXPERIENCE Coordinator, Kodiak Gray Whale Project 2000-2010 In 2000, Stacy found a dead gray whale on a Kodiak beach and over a period of 8 years rallied 150 community members and partnered with the U.S. Fish and Wild- life Service to treat the bones and reconstruct the skeleton for a permanent display at the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge Visitor Center. She received a grant from the Alaska Conservation Foundation in 2005 to finance the project and formed her own nonprofit organization that continues to support ongoing educational and art projects that further the awareness of conservation issues surrounding Gray Whales and the marine environment. Field Botanist, Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge 2005-2010 Stacy has been studying and documenting coastal Alaskan botany since 1973. Since 2005, she has conducted botanical inventory and plant community research in the Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Kodiak Bear Habitat
    3. Kodiak Bear Habitat Synopsis: Kodiak bears live throughout most of the Kodiak archipelago and use virtually all available habitats from the coast to alpine regions. The archipelago is considered high-quality bear habitat, containing ample food, water, cover, and space. While vegetation is a substantial part of the bears’ diet, salmon is the most important source of protein for most Kodiak bears. Currently, the human population and related human development have minimal impacts on bear habitat. Potential threats include seasonal human use of inland and coastal areas, future developments (e.g., road and energy development) and related problems (e.g., oil spills), and natural occurrences (e.g., reduction in salmon stocks). Bear habitat and bear-human relationship are intimately intertwined; if people are not willing to make an effort to live around bears, large expanses of wilderness areas are necessary for sustainable bear populations. With this information in mind, the Citizens Advisory Committee(CAC) makes a number of recommendations to protect bear habitat on the archipelago. These recommendations cover the following subject areas: land use, acquisition, and planning; activities on Afognak Island; minimizing habitat degradation; road building in bear habitat; motorized access; bear-use areas; human activities in bear habitat; introduced species; and salmon as a part of bear habitat. 3.1 Habitat Requirements Kodiak bears live throughout the archipelago, except on Chirikof and the Trinity islands, and use virtually all available habitats from the coast to alpine regions. An estimated 2,980 bears live within the 4,757-square–mile area, and bear densities vary by area and by season.
    [Show full text]
  • Kodiak 18 Bear Essentials
    The Grizzlies of Kodiak: up close and personal An unique, exclusive, six person photographic experience to the remote bear habitat of Alaska’s Kodiak Island with Andy Skillen. September 2018 GBP6,595; US$8,350 (based on double occupancy) The Bear Essentials… The largest bear ever killed in North America was from Kodiak Island with a total skull size of 30.75 in (78.1 cm), and 8 of the top 10 brown bears listed in the Boone and Crockett record book are from Kodiak. The Kodiak Brown Bear (Ursus arctos middendorffi), is the largest subspecies of brown bear. These bears can weigh up to 1500 lb. (682 kg) or more and they occupy the islands of the Kodiak Archipelago in Southwestern Alaska. The bears’ traditional name in the Alutiiq language is Taquka-aq (Tah-goo-kuk) Taxonomy Taxonomist C.H. Merriam was the first to recognize Kodiak bears as unique and he named the species in honor of the celebrated Russian naturalist Dr. A. Th. von Middendorff. Subsequent taxonomic revisions merged most North American brown bears into a single subspecies (Ursus arctos horribilis), but Kodiak bears are still considered to be a unique subspecies (Ursus arctos middendorffi). Recent investigations of genetic samples from bears on Kodiak have shown that they are closely related to brown bears on the Alaska Peninsula and Kamchatka, Russia. It appears that Kodiak bears have been genetically isolated since at least the last ice age (10,000 to 12,000 years ago) and there is very little genetic diversity within the population. Although the current population is healthy and productive and has shown no overt adverse signs of inbreeding, it may be more susceptible to new diseases or parasites than other more diverse brown bear populations.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEW and Approvals
    . KODIAK NATIONAL WilDLIFE REFUGE Kodiak, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORI' Calendar Year 1987 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM REVIEW AND APPROVAlS KODIAK NATIONAL WilDLIFE REFUGE Kcxliak, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REroRI' calendar Year 1987 IN'I'ROil.X:TION The Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge was established by Executive Order Nt.nnber 8657 on August 19, 1941 "for i:J:e purpose of protecting i:J:e natural feeding and breeding range of i:J:e brown bears and oi:J:er wildlife on Uganik and Kodiak Islands, Alaska" (Figure l) • A one mile wide shoreline strip was made part of i:J:e refuge but remained open to i:J:e public land laws, resulting in rn.m:erous small OJaStal i.nf'x)ldings. In 1958 i:J:e one mile sh:>reline strip was closed to i:J:e public land laws and two la:r:ge peninsulas were rerroved fran i:J:e Refuge by Public Land Order Nt.nnber 1634. These peninsulas were to be rerroved fran i:J:e refuge so that they might be opened to livestock grazing. No leases have ever been let on i:J:ese areas and in 1982 as part of mitigation for i:J:e Terror Lake Hydroelectric Project one of i:J:ese peninsulas (Shea:rwater) was pennanently closed to livestock entry. The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation .Act of 1980 added approximately 50,000 acres of land on Afognak and Ban Islands to i:J:e Refuge, bringing i:J:e total acreage to approxi.m:l.tely 1.865 million acres, of which approxi.m:l.tely 310,000 acres are Native CMned but subject to Refuge regulations per Alaska Native Claims Settlenent .Act Section 22( g) (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine F. West Department of Archaeology Boston University 675 Commonwealth Avenue Boston, Massachusetts 02215
    Catherine F. West Department of Archaeology Boston University 675 Commonwealth Avenue Boston, Massachusetts 02215 [email protected] (617) 358-1652 http://sites.bu.edu/zooarchlab/ ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Academic Positions Boston University, Department of Archaeology 2013-Present Research Assistant Professor Boston University Marine Program 2015-Present Affiliated Faculty Boston University Biogeosciences Program 2015-Present Affiliated Faculty University of Maine, Department of Anthropology and Climate Change Institute 2011-2013 Assistant Professor National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution 2011-Present Research Collaborator Program in Human Ecology and Archaeobiology, Smithsonian Institution 2010-2011 Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA Research Assistant 2001-2005 Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, Seattle, WA 2000-2003 Research Assistant, Archaeology Public Outreach Coordinator Education University of Washington, Seattle, WA March 2009 Ph.D., Anthropology University of Washington, Seattle, WA March 2003 M.A., Anthropology Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA May 1999 B.A., History 2 Archaeological Field Experience Alutiiq Museum Community Archaeology Project and Field School, Kodiak, AK 2015 Co-Director http://www.alutiiqmuseum.org/education/programs/208-community-archaeology.html Chirikof Island, Alaska Expedition (funded by National Geographic) 2013 Principal Investigator http://sites.bu.edu/zooarchlab/research/
    [Show full text]
  • Kodiak Island Is a Part of an Archipelago of Islands Including Afognak, Shuyak, and 20 Smaller Islands
    Southcentral Region Southcentral Alaska Alaska Department of Fish and Game Recreational Fishing Series Division of Sport Fish Kodiak About Kodiak Kodiak Island is a part of an archipelago of islands including Afognak, Shuyak, and 20 smaller islands. Kodiak Island is the second-largest in the United States; only the big island of Hawaii is larger. The Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge covers two-thirds of Kodiak Island. The State of Alaska, various Alaska Native corporations, and private individuals own the remainder. The city of Kodiak is 250 air miles southwest of Anchorage. Two airlines, Alaska Airlines (1-800-252-7522) and ERA Airlines (1-800-866-8394), have daily flights from Anchorage. The Alaska Marine Highway system offers a passenger and vehicle ferry from Homer and Seward to Kodiak four times a week during the fishing season (1-800-642- 0066). About 11,000 people live along the Kodiak Island’s streams and lakes offer easily accessible and remote fishing Kodiak road system, and 14,000 opportunities for salmon, steelhead, Dolly Varden (above) and more. (ADF&G) visitors arrive every year. Available services include approximately 70 Regulations on the Road System differ slightly from charter operators, 33 remote lodges, six air taxi services, the Remote Area, so check the regulations book carefully. 12 state and federal public-use cabins, 10 private remote There are 75 miles of paved and hard-packed gravel roads cabins for rent, five hotels and motels, 30 bed-and- that cross 10 significant streams and provide access to 18 breakfasts, three sporting goods stores, and other amenities stocked lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Are the Alutiiq People?
    WHO A RE THE ALUT ii Q PEOPLE ? In the historic era, Russian traders called all of the Native peoples of southwestern Alaska “Aleut” – despite regional differences in language, cultural practices, and history. In the modern era, this has caused confusion. People with distinct cultures are known by the same name. Today, Kodiak’s Native people use a variety of self-designators. There is no one correct term. Many Elders prefer Aleut, a term they were taught as children. Today others choose Alutiiq or Sugpiaq. What does each of these terms mean? SUGPIAQ – This is a traditional self-designator of the Native people of Prince William Sound, the outer Kenai Peninsula, the Kodiak Archipelago, and the Alaska Peninsula. It means “real person” and it is the way Native people described themselves prior to Western contact. This term is used by some today. Sugpiaq is a popular self-designator on the Kenai Peninsula, and is gaining use on Kodiak. ALEUT – This word means “coastal dweller” and it is derived ALUTIIQ from a Siberian Native language. Russian traders introduced the OR term, using it to describe the Native people they encountered ALUTIIT? in the Aleutian Islands, the Alaska Peninsula, and the Kodiak archipelago. Aleut is still frequently used to refer to the Native ALUTIIQ (singular) • Noun: to describe one person: people of the Aleutian Islands, although the word Unangan – I am an Alutiiq. meaning “we the people” in the region’s traditional language – is • Noun: to describe the language: gaining popularity. They are speaking Alutiiq. • Adjective: as a modified: There are many Alutiiq artists.
    [Show full text]
  • Deedie Pearson
    Deedie Pearson Transcript of an Oral History Conducted by Anjuli Grantham at Kodiak, Alaska On June 12, 18, and 26, 2015 (With subsequent corrections and additions) Kodiak Historical Society About West Side Stories This oral history is part of the West Side Stories project of the Kodiak Historical Society. West Side Stories is a public humanities and art project that intended to document the history of the west side of Kodiak Island through oral history, photography, and art. The oral histories chart the personal stories of individuals with a longtime connection to the west side of Kodiak Island, defined for the scope of this project as the area buffeted by the Shelikof Strait that stretches from Kupreanof Strait south to the village of Karluk. The project endeavored to create historical primary source material for a region that lacks substantive documentation and engage west side individuals in the creation of that material. The original audio recording of this interview is available by contacting the Kodiak Historical Society. Additional associated content is available at the Kodiak Historical Society/ Baranov Museum, including photographs of interview subjects and west side places taken during the summer of 2015, archival collections related to the west side, and journals and art projects created by west side residents in 2015. This project is made possible due to the contributions of project partners and sponsors, including the Alaska Historical Society, Alaska Humanities Forum, Alaska State Council on the Arts, Kodiak Maritime Museum, Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge, Kodiak Public Broadcasting, Prince William Sound Regional Citizens Advisory Council, and Salmon Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for Proposed Kodiak Microwave Systems, LLC Telecommunications Project
    Environmental Assessment for Proposed Kodiak Microwave Systems, LLC Telecommunications Project U.S. Fish United States Fish and Wildlife Service Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge 1390 Buskin River Road Kodiak, AK 99615 June 2016 Photo by Yathin Krishnappa U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Environmental Assessment For the Kodiak Microwave Systems, LLC Telecommunications Project, Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge, Kodiak Island, Alaska This Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared in accordance with the US Department of Interior Departmental Manual 516, and is in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (and subsequent amendments) (P.L. 91-190) and the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations dated November 1978 (40 CFR 1500-1508). This EA serves as a public document to briefly provide sufficient evidence and analysis for determining the need to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement or a Finding of No Significant Impact. This EA concisely describes the need for the proposal, a reasonable range of alternatives, and potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternatives. The EA provides a list of the agencies and persons consulted during EA preparation. 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction & Executive Summary 4 1.1 Purpose and Need 6 1.2 Criteria Being Used to Evaluate the Project 6 1.3 Key Environmental Requirements & Integration of Other Environmental Statutes & Regulations 6 1.4 Non-Federal Permits Required for the Project 8 1.5 Agency and Public Involvement 9 1.6 Government-to-Government Consultation
    [Show full text]