DOCSLIB.ORG

Suction Installed Caisson Foundations for Offshore Wind: Design Guidelines February 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suction Installed Caisson Foundations for Offshore Wind: Design Guidelines February 2019 Offshore Wind Accelerator Suction Installed Caisson Foundations for Offshore Wind: Design Guidelines February 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. i LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................... vii Disclaimer .............................................................................................................................................. viii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. ix 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Objectives .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Offshore Wind Accelerator background ..................................................................... 1 1.3 Suction Installed Caisson Foundations (SICF) background .......................................... 1 1.4 Stakeholders ................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Extents and limitations ................................................................................................ 2 1.6 Document structure .................................................................................................... 3 2. Terminology, Notations and Abbreviations ............................................................................ 4 2.1 Terminology................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Conventions ................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 7 3. Design Principles ...................................................................................................................10 3.1 Safety philosophy ......................................................................................................10 3.2 Limit states ................................................................................................................10 3.2.1 Ultimate Limit State (ULS) ...................................................................................10 3.2.2 Accidental Limit State (ALS) .................................................................................11 3.2.3 Fatigue Limit State (FLS) ......................................................................................11 3.2.4 Serviceability Limit State (SLS) .............................................................................11 3.3 Design Optimisation ..................................................................................................12 3.4 Design by LRFD (partial safety factor) method .........................................................13 3.4.1 Approach .............................................................................................................13 3.4.2 Load and material factors for WTG foundations .................................................14 3.4.3 Load and material factors for offshore substation foundations .........................15 4. Site Geotechnical Conditions ................................................................................................16 4.1 Site characterisation requirements ...........................................................................16 February 2019 – Issue 1.0 | i 4.2 Geotechnical hazards ................................................................................................17 4.3 Geophysical survey ....................................................................................................18 4.4 Geotechnical survey ..................................................................................................19 4.5 Ground model ...........................................................................................................21 4.6 Geotechnical parameters for design and installation ...............................................21 4.7 Special considerations for selection of soil parameters............................................22 4.8 Clustering...................................................................................................................23 5. Foundation Loading ..............................................................................................................24 5.1 General ......................................................................................................................24 5.2 Interfaces between model elements ........................................................................24 5.2.1 Sign convention ...................................................................................................24 5.2.2 Load reference point (interface point) ................................................................25 5.3 Foundation load components ...................................................................................25 5.4 Load cases .................................................................................................................25 5.5 Load generation and modelling.................................................................................26 5.5.1 Design process .....................................................................................................26 5.5.2 Integrated Load Analysis (ILA) / Coupled approach ............................................27 5.5.3 Sequential Load Analysis (SLA) / Uncoupled approach .......................................27 5.5.4 Comparison of Integrated and Sequential Load Analysis ....................................28 5.6 Foundation damping .................................................................................................29 5.7 Extraction of loads acting on SICFs ............................................................................30 5.7.1 Relevant load characteristics ...............................................................................30 5.7.2 Reporting .............................................................................................................31 6. Installation Design ................................................................................................................32 6.1 Installation design and risk management .................................................................32 6.2 Penetration resistance ..............................................................................................32 6.2.1 Mechanism-based methods ................................................................................34 6.2.2 CPT-based methods .............................................................................................36 6.3 Touch down and self-weight penetration .................................................................37 6.4 Suction installation ....................................................................................................38 6.4.1 Limits to suction pressures ..................................................................................38 6.4.2 Installation tolerances – penetration and verticality ..........................................41 6.5 Trial installations .......................................................................................................42 6.6 Non-homogenous soils for installation .....................................................................42 February 2019 – Issue 1.0 | ii 6.6.1 Installation in layered or heterogeneous soils ....................................................43 6.6.2 Installation in other materials .............................................................................43 6.7 Multi-chamber designs ..............................................................................................44 7. Site Installation Operations ..................................................................................................45 7.1 Criticality ....................................................................................................................45 7.2 Instrumentation ........................................................................................................45 7.3 Seabed preparation and scour protection ................................................................46 7.4 Lowering through splash zone (venting) and touchdown .........................................47 7.5 Self-weight penetration ............................................................................................48 7.6 Suction-assisted penetration.....................................................................................48 7.7 Underbase filling .......................................................................................................49 7.7.1 Considerations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture Notes on CAISSONS Version
    CT3330 Hydraulic Structures Caissons Lecture notes version February 2011 M.Z. Voorendt, W.F. Molenaar, K.G. Bezuyen Hydraulic Structures Caissons Department of Hydraulic Engineering 2 CT3330 Faculty of Civil Engineering Delft University of Technology Hydraulic Structures Caissons TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE......................................................................................................................................................5 READER TO THESE LECTURE NOTES .....................................................................................................5 1. Introduction to caissons.........................................................................................................................7 1.1 Definition ..............................................................................................................................................7 1.2 Types ...................................................................................................................................................7 1.2.1 Standard caisson...........................................................................................................................7 1.2.2 Pneumatic caisson ........................................................................................................................7 1.3 Final positions of caissons / where caissons end up ...........................................................................8 1.4 Functions..............................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector M. Dolores Esteban *, José-Santos López-Gutiérrez and Vicente Negro Research Group on Marine, Coastal and Port Environment and other Sensitive Areas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, E28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (J.-S.L.-G.); [email protected] (V.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 December 2018; Accepted: 24 January 2019; Published: 12 March 2019 Abstract: In recent years, the offshore wind industry has seen an important boost that is expected to continue in the coming years. In order for the offshore wind industry to achieve adequate development, it is essential to solve some existing uncertainties, some of which relate to foundations. These foundations are important for this type of project. As foundations represent approximately 35% of the total cost of an offshore wind project, it is essential that they receive special attention. There are different types of foundations that are used in the offshore wind industry. The most common types are steel monopiles, gravity-based structures (GBS), tripods, and jackets. However, there are some other types, such as suction caissons, tripiles, etc. For high water depths, the alternative to the previously mentioned foundations is the use of floating supports. Some offshore wind installations currently in operation have GBS-type foundations (also known as GBF: Gravity-based foundation). Although this typology has not been widely used until now, there is research that has highlighted its advantages over other types of foundation for both small and large water depth sites. There are no doubts over the importance of GBS.
    [Show full text]
  • Suction Caisson Track Record 2019
    Suction Caisson Track Record 2019 Expertise, Seabed and Below. cathiegroup.com Pushing Boundaries, Delivering Solutions cathie-associates.com Client Project Name Description Date Region Sector Genesis Oil and Gas Detailed design and seismic assessment of suction caissons for a manifold Consultants Ltd Design experience & fishing protection structure. 2019 Middle East Oil & Gas Third party driveability analysis for CP and assessment of suction-assisted Northern Total E&P Third-party review penetration of CAN-ductor (composite CP and suction can). 2018-2019 Europe Oil & Gas FPSO mooring anchor concept selection (driven or suction pile), FEED- stage sizing and installation analysis of selected concept (suction caisson), including inverse catenary assessment and effect of seismic loading/ SBM Offshore Design experience liquefaction. 2018-2019 Oceania Oil & Gas R&D and development of Development of philosophy and design standard doucments for design methods/ geotechnical anchor systems, which will be part of SBM Corporate Northern SBM Offshore guidelines Specifications, Geotechnical discipline. 2018-2019 Europe Oil & Gas R&D and development of design methods/guide- Update seismic design guidelines to address specific Technip queries Northern Technip U.K. lines (including design of caisson foundations). 2018-2019 Europe Oil & Gas Mc Dermott Inc Foundation design review Design review of skirted mudmat and bucket foundations . 2018 Mediterranean Oil & Gas Holding capacity analysis accounting f.or chain trenching for different ExxonMobil Third-party review configurations. 2018 Africa Oil & Gas Suction Caisson Track Record 2019 Client Project Name Description Date Region Sector Geotechnical design review of 2 Universal Foundation monobucket designs for Deutsche Bucht site in Germany. The review covers document review Northern Offshore Van Oord Third-party review and independent installation and in-service design calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Options in the Oil and Gas Industry, Practical Law UK Practice Note
    Financing options in the oil and gas industry, Practical Law UK Practice Note... Financing options in the oil and gas industry by Suzanne Szczetnikowicz and John Dewar, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP and Practical Law Finance. Practice notes | Maintained | United Kingdom Scope of this note Industry overview Upstream What is an upstream oil and gas project? Typical equity structure Relationship with the state Key commercial contracts in an upstream project Specific risks in financing an upstream project Sources of financing in the upstream sector Midstream, downstream and integrated projects Typical equity structures What is a midstream oil and gas project? Specific risks in financing a midstream project What is a downstream oil and gas project? Specific risks in financing a downstream project Integrated projects Sources of financing in midstream, downstream and integrated projects Multi-sourced project finance Shareholder funding Equity bridge financing Additional sources of financing Other financing considerations for the oil and gas sectors Expansion financings Hedging Refinancing Current market trends A note on the structures and financing options and risks typically associated with the oil and gas industry. © 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1 Financing options in the oil and gas industry, Practical Law UK Practice Note... Scope of this note This note considers the structures, financing options and risks typically associated with the oil and gas industry. It is written from the perspective of a lawyer seeking to structure a project that is capable of being financed and also addresses the aspects of funding various components of the industry from exploration and extraction to refining, processing, storage and transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Evaluation of a Pneumatic Caisson Shaft Alternative for a Proposed Subterranean Library at MIT
    Design and Evaluation of a Pneumatic Caisson Shaft Alternative for a Proposed Subterranean Library at MIT by Jon Brian Isaacson B.Sc. Geological Engineering 1998 B.Sc. Economics 2000 M.Sc. Geological Engineering 2000 University of Missouri-Rolla Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF ENGINEERING OF TECHNOLOGY in Civil and Environmental Engineering JUN 0 4 2001 AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIES JUNE 2001 ( 2001 Jon Brian Isaacson. All Rights Reserved. BARKER The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distributepublicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis for the purpose of publishing other works. Signature of Author___ _____ u oDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 11, 2001 Certified by Herbert H. Einstein, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Oral Buyukozturk, Ph.D. Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Studies Room 14-0551 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Ph: 617.253.2800 MITLibraries Email: [email protected] Document Services http://Iibraries.mit.eduldocs DISCLAIMER OF QUALITY Due to the condition of the original material, there are unavoidable flaws in this reproduction. We have made every effort possible to provide you with the best copy available. If you are dissatisfied with this product and find it unusable, please contact Document Services as soon as possible. Thank you. The images contained in this document are of the best quality available. 2 Design and Evaluation of a Pneumatic Caisson Shaft Alternative for a Proposed Subterranean Library at MIT by Jon Brian Isaacson Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 11, 2001 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Suction Caissons: Model Tests PI’S: R.E
    1 Comprehensive Status Report: November 18, 2004 OTRC Project Title: Suction Caissons & Vertically Loaded Anchors MMS Project 362 TO 16169 Project Subtitle: Suction Caissons: Model Tests PI’s: R.E. Olson, Alan Rauch, & Robert B. Gilbert MMS COTR: A. Konczvald This report provides a comprehensive summary the research completed in all prior Phases of this project (September 1999 – August 2004), and describes research being done in the present Phase (September 2004 – August 2005) to complete this project. Note that this report addresses one of four related research areas on this project. The other three areas are reported separately under the subtitles – Suction Caissons: Seafloor Characterization for Deepwater Foundations, Suction Caissons: Finite Element Modeling, and Suction Caissons & Vertically Loaded Anchors: Design Analysis Methods. Suction Caissons: Model Tests Roy E. Olson and Robert B. Gilbert BRIEF HISTORY OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES The intent of this introductory section is to provide a brief history of evolution that led to use of suction caissons. It is not intended to deal with offshore structures in general, nor with structures not part of the evolution of suction caissons. Further, views here are those of the authors and may not represent the convoluted manner in which developments typically occur. The early offshore oil production structures were steel frames (Fig. 1), called jackets, which were fixed to the seafloor using open-end steel pipe piles that were driven through the jacket legs and then welded to the jacket. When oil was discovered in the North Sea, the subsoil was generally stiff enough that shallow foundations could be used. This allowed the design to change to gravity platforms (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Element Analysis of Suction Bucket Foundations in Sand Subjected to Cyclic Loading
    Finite Element Analysis of Suction Bucket Foundations in Sand Subjected to Cyclic Loading Ingerid Elisabeth Rolstad Jahren Civil and Environmental Engineering Submission date: June 2018 Supervisor: Hans Petter Jostad, IBM Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering i Preface This is a master thesis written in the spring of 2018 as the final part of my M.Sc. degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) in Trondheim. The thesis is a part of the master’s programme in Geotechnical Engi- neering at the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The thesis has been carried out in a cooperation with the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), which also proposed the thesis. Trondheim, 2018-06-10 Ingerid Rolstad Jahren iii Acknowledgement I would like to express my gratitude to my academic supervisor Adjunct Prof. Hans Petter Jostad, NGI, who provided great insight and expertise throughout the thesis work. His interest and enthusiasm for the topic in addition to great knowledge is truly inspiring. I also thank members of the staff at the Geotechnical Division at NTNU for kindly sharing their wisdom during my years as a student at NTNU. Finally, thank you to all my fellow students for valuable discussions and support. I.R.J. v Abstract A suction bucket or suction caisson is a foundation concept for supporting offshore installa- tions. The practical experience related to this concept is mainly based on applications in the oil and gas industry. Observations show significant difference in response for wind turbines compared to more traditional installations offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Caisson Disease1
    CAISSON DISEASE1 BY A. E. BOYCOTT COMPRESSED air has been used for a long time to keep out the water in making tunnels, sinking shafts and the like in watery ground. A rigid metal tube or caisson is driven into the earth and filled with air compressed to the pressure necessary to keep out the water. The mon excavate the earth, fix the lining of the tunnel or the foundations of the bridge, &c, as the case may be, from inside, working in the compressed air. They enter and leave the tube by a small chamber at one end provided with doors, which open on the one hand to outside air and on the other to the compressed air. This 'air-lock' is furnished with taps whereby the pressure within it is first brought to atmospheric pressure; the men then enter, close the door to air, open the cock which is in communication with the caisson, equalize the pressures in the caisson and the air-lock, and then open the other door and so enter the caisson. They leave by following the reverse process. 1 The important literature of caisson disease is contained in, or may bo readily found through, the following:— (1) Paul Bert, La Presslon Varomttriqiie, Paris, 1878. Full account of all the earlier literature with the classical researches of the author. (2) E. H. Snell, Compressed Air Illness, London, 1896. Besides a critical account of the theories of caisson disease, gives the author's experience as medical officer of the Blackwall Tunnel. (3) R. Heller, W. Mager, and H.
    [Show full text]
  • Tip Focus Group on Energy Innovation System Country Report Upstream Oil and Gas in Norway
    TIP FOCUS GROUP ON ENERGY INNOVATION SYSTEM COUNTRY REPORT UPSTREAM OIL AND GAS IN NORWAY Aslaug Mikkelsen, Stavanger University College/Rogaland Research Kari Jøsendal, Rogaland Research Jon Moxnes Steineke, Nordregio Antje Rapmund, Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education TABLE OF CONTENT 1 Government institutions and regulatory bodies...................................................................8 Main government institutions........................................................................................................8 Natural resource conditions and regulatory framework ..............................................................9 Globalization and market conditions..........................................................................................10 2 Private sector drivers of innovation in upstream oil and gas ...........................................10 Trends in private sector R&D expenditures ...............................................................................11 3 Public research organizations active in oil and gas exploration and production............12 Trends in public sector R&D expenditures.................................................................................13 Publicly funded research programmes .......................................................................................13 4 Upstream oil and gas: knowledge creation, diffusion and exploitation ...........................15 Private and national oil companies ............................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Architects and Offshore Engineering Consultants
    Geanti Marine Naval Architects and Offshore Engineering Consultants GEANTI have just completed the world’s first RBA (Risk Based Approach) Life Extensions of entire oil rigs based on our world-leading methodology obtained through our Research and Development, which is approved and in accordance with Classification Societies’ Rules and Regulations We Make I d e a s F l o a t www.geantimarine.com © Copyright 2016 of Geanti Marine Limited TRADEMARK: UK00003219595 1 Our Driving Values We aim to always achieve our mission by adhering to our six core driving values: Inspiration Collaboration We are a group of inspired Marine Consultants that personally We focus on integrating with our clients, as if we were support Asset Managers to achieve their duties. part of your company and achieve your goals as if they were our own. Innovation We innovate using the latest methods to bring success to our Responsiveness clients' projects. We look at problems from different angles and We respond to the needs of our clients whilst being perspectives. respectful to deadlines and the pressures of working in a global industry. Geanti is available to provide 24 hour Flexibility support and guidance to your business. Relocatable to project site team of Naval Architects, Marine Engineers and other Consultants that are always ready to re- Progress spond in a timely manner. Geanti is on the forefront of offshore technology prac- tices and engineering standards. Project and Consultancy Services Geanti offers you services with a full range of marine capabilities for all stages of a project’s lifecycle from conceptual design to decommissioning covering desktop/feasibility studies, anal- yses, appraisals, optimisations, life time extensions, mooring, testing and verification services, risk management and safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewables Investor Event
    Renewables Investor Event 29 September 2020 1 © Subsea 7 - 2020 Subsea 7 Renewables Forward looking statements This announcement may contain ‘forward-looking statements’ (within the meaning of the safe harbour provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements relate to our current expectations, beliefs, intentions, assumptions or strategies regarding the future and are subject to known and unknown risks that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘future’, ‘goal’, ‘intend’, ‘likely’ ‘may’, ‘plan’, ‘project’, ‘seek’, ‘should’, ‘strategy’ ‘will’, and similar expressions. The principal risks which could affect future operations of the Group are described in the ‘Risk Management’ section of the Group’s Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2019. Factors that may cause actual and future results and trends to differ materially from our forward-looking statements include (but are not limited to): (i) our ability to deliver fixed price projects in accordance with client expectations and within the parameters of our bids, and to avoid cost overruns; (ii) our ability to collect receivables, negotiate variation orders and collect the related revenue; (iii) our ability to recover costs on significant projects; (iv) capital expenditure by oil and gas companies,
    [Show full text]
  • Technipfmc 2021.3.31-8K ER Exhibit
    Press Release TechnipFMC Announces First Quarter 2021 Results • Strong financial performance in both Subsea and Surface Technologies • Cash flow from continuing operations $182 million, free cash flow $137 million • Subsea inbound orders more than doubled sequentially to $1.5 billion • New partnerships leverage subsea expertise for integrated wind, wave energy LONDON, PARIS, HOUSTON, April 27, 2021 - TechnipFMC plc (NYSE: FTI) (Paris: FTI) today reported first quarter 2021 results. Summary Financial Results from Continuing Operations Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures are provided in financial schedules. Three Months Ended March 31, March 31, (In millions, except per share amounts) 2021 2020 Change Revenue $1,632.0 $1,582.6 3.1% Income (loss) $430.3 $(3,234.8) n/m Diluted earnings (loss) per share $0.95 $(7.23) n/m Adjusted EBITDA $165.2 $79.7 107.3% Adjusted EBITDA margin 10.1% 5.0% 510 bps Adjusted income (loss) $(14.5) $(60.0) n/m Adjusted diluted earnings (loss) per share $(0.03) $(0.13) n/m Inbound orders $1,722.1 $1,538.4 11.9% Backlog $7,221.4 $8,195.5 (11.9%) Total Company revenue in the first quarter was $1,632 million. Income from continuing operations attributable to TechnipFMC plc was $430.3 million, or $0.95 per diluted share. These results included income from the Company’s equity investment in Technip Energies of $470.1 million primarily related to a favorable change in fair market value. After-tax charges and credits totaled $444.8 million of credit, or $0.99 per diluted share.
    [Show full text]