DOCSLIB.ORG

TAXONOMIC REVISION of Zelomorpha ASHMEAD, 1900 and Hemichoma ENDERLEIN, 1920 (BRACONIDAE: AGATHIDINAE) with a PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS of COLOR PATTERNS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 TAXONOMIC REVISION OF Zelomorpha ASHMEAD, 1900 AND Hemichoma ENDERLEIN, 1920 (BRACONIDAE: AGATHIDINAE) WITH A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF COLOR PATTERNS Carlos Eduardo Sarmiento-Monroy University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Sarmiento-Monroy, Carlos Eduardo, "TAXONOMIC REVISION OF Zelomorpha ASHMEAD, 1900 AND Hemichoma ENDERLEIN, 1920 (BRACONIDAE: AGATHIDINAE) WITH A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF COLOR PATTERNS" (2006). University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 351. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/351 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Carlos Eduardo Sarmiento-Monroy The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2006 iii TAXONOMIC REVISION OF Zelomorpha ASHMEAD, 1900 AND Hemichoma ENDERLEIN, 1920 (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE: AGATHIDINAE) WITH A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF COLOR PATTERNS ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Agriculture at the University of Kentucky By Carlos Eduardo Sarmiento-Monroy Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Michael J. Sharkey, Professor of Entomology Lexington, Kentucky 2006 Copyright © Carlos Eduardo Sarmiento-Monroy 2006 iii ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION TAXONOMIC REVISION OF Zelomorpha ASHMEAD, 1900 AND Hemichoma ENDERLEIN, 1920 (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE: AGATHIDINAE) WITH A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF COLOR PATTERNS A revision and a phylogenetic analysis of the genera Zelomorpha Ashmead, 1900 and Hemichoma Enderlein, 1920 were conducted. Phylogenetic analyses used molecular and morphological data. A total of 39 sequences were obtained for COI (887 bases long) and 57 for 28S (1254 bases long). DNA sequences were aligned manually and also aligned with ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1997). Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian approaches were applied to phylogenetic analyses with each gene region analyzed separately and in a combined analysis. The phylogenetic analysis analyses supported the monophyletic status of the genera Zelomorpha, as defined by Sharkey et al. (2006), and Hemichoma; they upholdseld the hypothesis that the the New World species formerly placed in Biroia belonged to Zelomorpha, and corroborated the synonomy ofgenus Dichelosus with Zelomorpha (Sarmiento and Sharkey, 2005). A total of 3,242 specimens of Hemichoma and Zelomorpha collected through the New World representing 113 species were examined. In addition to the 29 species of Zelomorpha described originally in diverse genera and now moved into the Zelomorpha, 74 new species are described. Seven new species are described for the genus Hemichoma for a total of 10 species. All species are fully redescribed. Fully illustrated keys to the species of Zelomorpha and Hemichoma are provided. The phylogenetic results based on maximum parsimony suggest that, despite the colorful nature of the sister group Hemichoma, species of Zelomorpha were nocturnal and became diurnal secondarily in one lineage. The change to diurnality is linked to a decrease in eye size, to an increase in body size, and to the emergence of colorful patterns. Palatability field tests using lizards as predators of Zelomorpha concinna, a common species with one of the more characteristic and bright color patterns, suggest that the coloration has a warning function and that this wasp is highly unpalatable. Evidence was found that the short ventrally curved ovipositor is an effective defensive structure. iii DISCLAIMER: The text of this dissertation does not constitute the publication of new species as defined by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The newly estrablished species names in this work will be/have been recognized as valid upon their publication in a peer-reviewed journal. KEY WORDS: Systematics and evolution, Braconidae, Color patterns origin, Mimicry, Taxonomy. Carlos Eduardo Sarmiento-Monroy. 11 December 2006 iii TAXONOMIC REVISION OF Zelomorpha ASHMEAD, 1900 AND Hemichoma ENDERLEIN, 1920 (BRACONIDAE: AGATHIDINAE) WITH A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF COLOR PATTERNS By Carlos Eduardo Sarmiento-Monroy Dr. Michael J. Sharkey Director of Dissertation Dr. Kenneth Yeargan Director of Graduate Studies 11 December, 2006 iii RULES FOR THE USE OF DISSERTATIONS Unpublished dissertations submitted for the Doctor's degree and deposited in the University of Kentucky Library are as a rule open for inspection, but are to be used only with due regard to the rights of the authors. Bibliographical references may be noted, but quotations or summaries of parts may be published only with the permission of the author, and with the usual scholarly acknowledgments. Extensive copying or publication of the dissertation in whole or in part also requires the consent of the Dean of the Graduate School of the University of Kentucky. A library that borrows this dissertation for use by its patrons is expected to secure the signature of each user iii .DISSERTATION Carlos Eduardo Sarmiento-Monroy The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2006 iii TAXONOMIC REVISION OF Zelomorpha ASHMEAD, 1900 AND Hemichoma ENDERLEIN, 1920 (BRACONIDAE: AGATHIDINAE) WITH A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF COLOR PATTERNS _______________________________________ DISSERTATION _______________________________________ A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Agriculture at the University of Kentucky By Carlos Eduardo Sarmiento-Monroy Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Michael J. Sharkey, Professor of Entomology Lexington, Kentucky Copyright © Carlos Eduardo Sarmiento-Monroy 2006 iii This dissertation is dedicated to my loving wife Angela Rocio Amarillo-Suarez and my daughter, María Alejandra Sarmiento-Amarillo, my parents Maria Cecilia Monroy, Helena Monroy, and Eduardo Monroy (R.I.P.), my guide and friend Dr. Michael J. Sharkey and Dr. Bobby Pass (R.I.P.), without whose encouragement this work would not have been possible iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The dissertation benefited from the advice of several people. First, to Dr. Michael J. Sharkey for his continuous encouragement and excellent advice. He was patient and interested in obtaining the best I could give in everything I did under his supervision. He is a great advisor and friend. Special thanks to my advisory committee members, Dr. David H. Wise, Dr. Christopher Schardl, Dr. Bruce Webb, and external examiner Dr. Randal Voss. Their advice was valuable throughout my graduate studies. Thanks to Dr. Bobby Pass (R. I. P.) and all professors I had during my graduate courses from which I found different and interesting ways too look at insects as model organisms in ecology, animal-plant interactions, behavior, systematics, genetics, evolution, and physiology. Thanks also to Drs. D. Potter, K. Haynes, K. V. Yeargan, Subba Reddi Palli, and J. Obrycki. I thank the curators of all the museums that loaned specimens. Several people provided advice and support for the field studies of color function: Dr. A. Bouskila (Ben Gurion Univ), Dr. N. Woodley (Smithsonian Institute), J. V. Rueda (Univ. Nacional de Colombia), M. Hernandez (R.I.P.) (Tayrona National Park), J. Avila. Dr. M. Speed, and Dr. L. Gilbert. I am indebted to my lab mates Katja Seltmann, Andy Boring, Tom Pucci, Kevin Pitz, and Barbara Sharanowski. To Dr. Sharkey’s Lab. Martha Potts. To my friend Dr. Jordi Moya-Laraño for his encouragement and mentorship during his stay at UKY. To Angelika Fath-Goodin for her help with translations from German. To the many fellow graduate students from whom I obtained valuable help, specially Janet Lensing, Charlene Rucker, Amanda Stayley, Cora Allard, Jamee Hubbard, and Torrence Gill. To Dr. Sharkey´s undergraduate team Cheryl Lindsay, Jonathan Roden, and Vasudevan Mahalingam. I thank Bruce Webb’s lab team I thank Bruce Webb´s lab team Matt, Turnbull, Kojhiro Tanaka, Walaikorn Rattanadechakul, Stephanie Dickey, and Jeremy Kroemer who provided important support in part of my thesis. I am sincerely grateful to all administrators, professors and graduate students with whom I shared my time, especially to the Dr. Bruce Webb and Dr. Michael Goodin families. They made iii this road easier and enjoyable. Thanks to the people at John Heraty´s lab (UC Riverside) who hosted me in 2002. To David Wesneat’s lab for support with color analyses From Colombia, I am grateful to the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, the Instituto de Ciencias Naturales and to my friends Fernando Fernandez, Helmuth Aguirre, Andrea Rodriguez, and Juan Vargas who were very helpful during the final days of this project The National Science Foundation of the United States of America (NSF-DEB 9972024, 0205982), the Graduate School of the University of Kentucky, the Humboldt Institute of Colombia and the Colombian National Parks System provided logistical and financial support to my research and to my participation at scientific meetings. Finally, but not least, I like to express my sincere gratitude to all members of my family for their encouragement, help and time iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................iii
Recommended publications
  • Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae)

    Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae)

    Zootaxa 3916 (1): 001–083 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3916.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:15384700-9D9B-4F77-AA0B-FA6DA317BCCB ZOOTAXA 3916 A revision of the New World species of Cremnops Förster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae) ERIKA M. TUCKER, ERIC G. CHAPMAN & MICHAEL J. SHARKEY Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by J. Jennings: 1 Oct. 2014; published: 9 Feb. 2015 ERIKA M. TUCKER, ERIC G. CHAPMAN & MICHAEL J. SHARKEY A revision of the New World species of Cremnops Förster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae) (Zootaxa 3916) 83 pp.; 30 cm. 9 Feb. 2015 ISBN 978-1-77557-633-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-634-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2015 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2015 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 3916 (1) © 2015 Magnolia Press TUCKER ET AL.
  • Autographa Gamma

    Autographa Gamma

    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
  • Cross-Crop Resistance of Spodoptera Frugiperda Selected on Bt Maize To

    Cross-Crop Resistance of Spodoptera Frugiperda Selected on Bt Maize To

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Cross‑crop resistance of Spodoptera frugiperda selected on Bt maize to genetically‑modifed soybean expressing Cry1Ac and Cry1F proteins in Brazil Eduardo P. Machado1, Gerson L. dos S. Rodrigues Junior1, Fábio M. Führ1, Stefan L. Zago1, Luiz H. Marques2*, Antonio C. Santos2, Timothy Nowatzki3, Mark L. Dahmer3, Celso Omoto4 & Oderlei Bernardi1* Spodoptera frugiperda is one of the main pests of maize and cotton in Brazil and has increased its occurrence on soybean. Field‑evolved resistance of this species to Cry1 Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) proteins expressed in maize has been characterized in Brazil, Argentina, Puerto Rico and southeastern U.S. Here, we conducted studies to evaluate the survival and development of S. frugiperda strains that are susceptible, selected for resistance to Bt‑maize single (Cry1F) or pyramided (Cry1F/Cry1A.105/ Cry2Ab2) events and F­ 1 hybrids of the selected and susceptible strains (heterozygotes) on DAS‑ 444Ø6‑6 × DAS‑81419‑2 soybean with tolerance to 2,4‑d, glyphosate and ammonium glufosinate herbicides (event DAS‑444Ø6‑6) and insect‑resistant due to expression of Cry1Ac and Cry1F Bt proteins (event DAS‑81419‑2). Susceptible insects of S. frugiperda did not survive on Cry1Ac/Cry1F‑ soybean. However, homozygous‑resistant and heterozygous insects were able to survive and emerge as fertile adults when fed on Cry1Ac/Cry1F‑soybean, suggesting that the resistance is partially recessive. Life history studies revealed that homozygous‑resistant insects had similar development, reproductive performance, net reproductive rate, intrinsic and fnite rates of population increase on Cry1Ac/Cry1F‑soybean and non‑Bt soybean. In contrast, heterozygotes had their fertility life table parameters signifcantly reduced on Cry1Ac/Cry1F‑soybean.
  • 197 Section 9 Sunflower (Helianthus

    197 Section 9 Sunflower (Helianthus

    SECTION 9 SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.) 1. Taxonomy of the Genus Helianthus, Natural Habitat and Origins of the Cultivated Sunflower A. Taxonomy of the genus Helianthus The sunflower belongs to the genus Helianthus in the Composite family (Asterales order), which includes species with very diverse morphologies (herbs, shrubs, lianas, etc.). The genus Helianthus belongs to the Heliantheae tribe. This includes approximately 50 species originating in North and Central America. The basis for the botanical classification of the genus Helianthus was proposed by Heiser et al. (1969) and refined subsequently using new phenological, cladistic and biosystematic methods, (Robinson, 1979; Anashchenko, 1974, 1979; Schilling and Heiser, 1981) or molecular markers (Sossey-Alaoui et al., 1998). This approach splits Helianthus into four sections: Helianthus, Agrestes, Ciliares and Atrorubens. This classification is set out in Table 1.18. Section Helianthus This section comprises 12 species, including H. annuus, the cultivated sunflower. These species, which are diploid (2n = 34), are interfertile and annual in almost all cases. For the majority, the natural distribution is central and western North America. They are generally well adapted to dry or even arid areas and sandy soils. The widespread H. annuus L. species includes (Heiser et al., 1969) plants cultivated for seed or fodder referred to as H. annuus var. macrocarpus (D.C), or cultivated for ornament (H. annuus subsp. annuus), and uncultivated wild and weedy plants (H. annuus subsp. lenticularis, H. annuus subsp. Texanus, etc.). Leaves of these species are usually alternate, ovoid and with a long petiole. Flower heads, or capitula, consist of tubular and ligulate florets, which may be deep purple, red or yellow.
  • Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae, Agathidini) 99 Doi: 10.3897/JHR.33.4373 Research Article

    Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae, Agathidini) 99 Doi: 10.3897/JHR.33.4373 Research Article

    JHR 33: 99–112Revision (2013) of Agathacrista new genus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae, Agathidini) 99 doi: 10.3897/JHR.33.4373 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoft.net/journals/jhr Revision of Agathacrista new genus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae, Agathidini) Michael J. Sharkey1,†, Stephanie A.C. Stoelb2,‡ 1 Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, S225 Agricultural Science Center North, Lexington, KY 40546-0091, USA 2 Bluegrass Community & Technical College, Lexington, KY 40546s † http://zoobank.org/77B8EC3A-442C-4A7A-AF85-A31C27E257F2 ‡ http://zoobank.org/9C4BCEB9-A6C7-4E7B-B9ED-334F7C8CE709 Corresponding author: Michael J. Sharkey ([email protected]) Academic editor: G. Broad | Received 21 November 2012 | Accepted 14 March 2012 | Published 1 August 2013 http://zoobank.org/2B514381-7262-4609-8441-EEDE2AF235E9 Citation: Sharkey MJ, Stoelb SAC (2013) Revision of Agathacrista new genus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae, Agathidini). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 33: 99–112. doi: 10.3897/JHR.33.4373 Abstract Based on a cladistic analysis, a new genus of Agathidini, Agathacrista Sharkey, is proposed and its phylo- genetic position hypothesized. Two previously described (Agathacrista cancellata, Agathacrista depressifera) and three new species (Agathacrista sailomi, Agathacrista winloni, Agathacrista krataeii) are included. The distribution of Agathacrista is limited to the Oriental region and southern portion of the eastern Palearctic. Keywords Insecta, identification key, taxonomy, systematics Introduction Agathacrista, as proposed here, includes two previously described species, both of which were included in the paraphyletic concepts of Bassus s.l. and Therophilus s.l. This paper is part of a series that investigates these non-monophyletic taxa, while describing taxa from Thailand, Costa Rica, or more inclusive areas of the world.
  • ATTRACTIVENESS and INJURY of Phaseolus Vulgaris L. GENOTYPES by Anticarsia Gemmatalis HÜBNER (LEPIDOPTERA: EREBIDAE)

    ATTRACTIVENESS and INJURY of Phaseolus Vulgaris L. GENOTYPES by Anticarsia Gemmatalis HÜBNER (LEPIDOPTERA: EREBIDAE)

    ATTRACTIVENESS AND INJURY OF Phaseolus vulgaris L. GENOTYPES BY Anticarsia gemmatalis HÜBNER (LEPIDOPTERA: EREBIDAE) J. G. E. A. R. Aiala1, L. Nogueira1*, G. A. P. Bernardes1, C. C. Melville2, N. T. Oliveira3, T. L. P. O. Souza4 1 Univ. Estadual de Goiás, UEG, Laboratório de Entomologia Agrícola, Rod. GO 330, Km 241, s/n°, Ipameri, GO, 75780-000, Brazil; 2Univ. Est. Paulista, UNESP/FCAV, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/nº, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil; 3Univ. Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, 37200-000, Brazil; 4Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, Santo Antônio de Goiás, GO, 75375- 000, Brazil; *corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) is the most defoliator pest, causing economic damage to many species of crop plants, including preferentially, soybeans – [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] and common bean - Phaseoulus vulgaris L. (Herzog; Todd, 1980; Panizzi et al., 2004). These crops are extensively cultivated in Brazil, thus forming very simplified and vulnerable agroecosystems, resulting in problems such as the excessive and indiscriminate use of pesticides, with adverse ecological consequences to the environment. In an attempt to diminish pesticide use in cropping systems, alternative control methods have been investigated, and host plant resistance is one of them (Boiça Júnior et al., 2014). Searching genotypes that express tolerance and/or resistance to insect pest represents an important step for plant breeding. Thus, the aim of this study we evaluated the attractiveness and the leaf injury caused by A. gemmatalis larvae in bean genotypes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Assays were conducted in the agricultural entomology Laboratory, UEG, Ipameri, GO, Brazil, under environmentally controlled conditions.
  • A New Skink Fauna from Caribbean Islands (Squamata, Mabuyidae, Mabuyinae)

    A New Skink Fauna from Caribbean Islands (Squamata, Mabuyidae, Mabuyinae)

    Zootaxa 3288: 1–244 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 3288 A new skink fauna from Caribbean islands (Squamata, Mabuyidae, Mabuyinae) S. BLAIR HEDGES1 & CAITLIN E. CONN Department of Biology, 208 Mueller Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by L.L. Grismer: 17 Feb. 2012; published: 30 Apr. 2012 S. BLAIR HEDGES & CAITLIN E. CONN A new skink fauna from Caribbean islands (Squamata, Mabuyidae, Mabuyinae) (Zootaxa 3288) 244 pp.; 30 cm. 30 Apr. 2012 ISBN 978-1-86977-893-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-894-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2012 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2012 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 3288 © 2012 Magnolia Press HEDGES & CONN Table of Contents Abstract . 4 Introduction . 5 Materials and methods. 8 Molecular analyses . 8 Morphological analyses . 9 Systematic accounts. 16 Results . 16 Molecular analyses . 16 Systematic Accounts .
  • Bacillus Thuringiensis Cry1ac Protein and the Genetic Material

    Bacillus Thuringiensis Cry1ac Protein and the Genetic Material

    BIOPESTICIDE REGISTRATION ACTION DOCUMENT Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac Protein and the Genetic Material (Vector PV-GMIR9) Necessary for Its Production in MON 87701 (OECD Unique Identifier: MON 877Ø1-2) Soybean [PC Code 006532] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division September 2010 Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac in MON 87701 Soybean Biopesticide Registration Action Document TABLE of CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 B. USE PROFILE ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 C. REGULATORY HISTORY .................................................................................................................................. 5 II. SCIENCE ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................................... 6 A. PRODUCT CHARACTERIZATION B. HUMAN HEALTH ASSESSMENT D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................. 15 E. INSECT RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT (IRM) ............................................................................................
  • Revision of the Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with Comparisons of Static and Dynamic Alignments

    Revision of the Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with Comparisons of Static and Dynamic Alignments

    Cladistics Cladistics 22 (2006) 546–567 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00121.x Revision of the Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with comparisons of static and dynamic alignments Michael J. Sharkey1,*, Nina M. Laurenne2,3, Barbara Sharanowski1, Donald L. J. Quicke4,5 and Debra Murray6 1S-225, Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Agric. Sci. Bldg-N., Lexington, KY, 40546, USA; 2Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum ⁄ Entomology Division, PO Box 17 (P. Rautatiekatu 13), FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland; 3Department of Biological and Enviromental Sciences, PO Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; 4Division of Biology, and Center for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK; 5Department of Entomology, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK; 6150_S Dirac Science Library, School of Computational Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA Accepted 30 May 2006 Abstract The phylogeny of the Agathidinae (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is investigated based on morphological and sequence data from the D2–3 regions of 28S rDNA. Morphology and molecular data were run simultaneously and separately and the molecular and combined data sets were analyzed using both static, Clustal W, and dynamic, POY, alignments. Both alignments were conducted under a variety of gap costs and results are compared. Sixty-two ingroup exemplars representing 22 genera and six outgroup taxa representing two subfamilies and five genera were included. Numerous taxa at the generic and tribal levels were tested for monophyly and the evolutionary history of several characters is discussed. The tribe Agathidini s.s. is found to be a derived member of the Microdini and the two are synonymized under the older name, Agathidini s.l.
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Alabagrus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

    A Taxonomic Revision of Alabagrus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

    yq~33 A taxonomic revision of Alabagrus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Michael J. Sharkey Biosystematics Research Centre , Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada KIA OC6 Contents Synopsis .................. ........................................... .. .................... .......... ..... 311 Introduction and historical review .............. ..................................... ............. .. 311 Material and methods .............................. ................................ .... ............... 312 Biology ................................................................................................... 313 Character analysis ...................................................................................... 314 Alabagrus Enderlein .... ...................................................... ............ .. .......... 341 Phylogeny ...... ........................................................ ............. .................. 341 Key to Alabagrus females ........................................... .......... ......... ........... 349 Acknowledgements ................................................................................... 416 References ............................................................. .. .. .. ....... ... .. ............. .... 416 Index ................ ...................................................................................... 437 Synopsis Alabagrus Enderl ein , a genus of New World, primarily Neotropical Agathidinae, is revised and redefined to include Asrriria Enderlein, Craspedoborhrus Enderlein
  • Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria 31

    Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria 31

    ^MEMOIRS of the NATIONAL I MUSEUM of VICTORIA 18 May 1970 %^ Registered at the G.P.O., Me MEMOIRS of the NATIONAL MUSEUM OF VICTORIA MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA No. 31 Director J. McNally Deputy Director and Editor Edmund D. Gill PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES 18 MAY 1970 NATIONAL MUSEUM OF VICTORIA Trustees Sir Robert Blackwood, MCE BEE FIE Aust (Chairman) Henry G. A. Osborne, BAgrSc (Deputy Chairman) James C. F. Wharton, BSc (Treasurer) Professor E. S. Hills, PhD (Lond) Hon DSc (Dunelm) DSc FIC FAA FRS Professor S. Sunderland, CMG MD BS DSc FRACP FRACS FAA The Hon. Sir Alistair Adam, MA LLM Sir Henry Somerset, CBE MSc FRACI MAIMM W. L. Drew, Secretary to Trustees Staff Director: John McNally, ED MSc Deputy Director: Edmund D. Gill, BA BD FGS FRGS Administration: A. G. Parsons (in charge) D. E. Quinn E. J. Peat G. H. Russell Patricia Rogers Nancie Wortley Gwenda Bloom Scientific Staff Geology and Palaeontology: Curator of Fossils: T. A. Darragh, MSc DipEd Curator of Minerals: A. W. Beasley, MSc PhD DIC Assistant Curator of Fossils: K. N. Bell, BSc DipEd Assistant: R. J. Evans Vertebrate Zoology: BSc (Hons) Curator of Vertebrates : Joan M. Dixon, Curator of Birds: A. R. McEvey, BA Assistant: A. J. Coventry Invertebrate Zoology: Curator of Insects: A. Neboiss, MSc FRES Curator of Invertebrates: B. J. Smith, BSc PhD Assistants: Elizabeth M. Matheson Ryllis J. Plant Anthropology: Curator of Anthropology: A. L. West, BA Dip Soc Stud Assistant: J. A. S. Holman Library: Librarian: Joyce M. Shaw, BA Assistant: Margret A. Stam, DipFDP Display and Preparation Staff: G.
  • Anticarsia Gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Effect of Formulations, Water Ph, Volume and Time of Application, and Type of Spray Nozzle

    Anticarsia Gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Effect of Formulations, Water Ph, Volume and Time of Application, and Type of Spray Nozzle

    January - March 2002 75 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL Field Efficacy of the Nucleopolyhedrovirus of Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Effect of Formulations, Water pH, Volume and Time of Application, and Type of Spray Nozzle MAURO TADEU BRAGA SILVA1 & FLÁVIO MOSCARDI2 1Fundacep Fecotrigo, C. postal 10, 98100-970, Cruz Alta, RS 2Embrapa Soja, C. postal 231, 86001-970, Londrina, PR Neotropical Entomology 31(1): 075-083 (2002) Eficiência do Nucleopoliedrovirus de Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) em Campo: Efeito de Formulações do Vírus, pH da Água, Volume e Horário de Aplicação, e Tipo de Bico de Pulverização RESUMO – Avaliou-se o controle de Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner através do seu nucleopoliedrovirus (AgMNPV), em função de diferentes parâmetros envolvidos com o uso desse inseticida biológico, visando elucidar alguns casos de baixa eficiência em determinadas regiões do País, principalmente no Rio Grande do Sul (RS). O trabalho foi conduzido em quatro safras, de 1994/95 a 97/98, em Cruz Alta – RS, avaliando-se os seguintes fatores sobre a eficiência do AgMNPV: formulações comerciais disponíveis; pH da calda; volume de calda; horário de aplicação; ponta de pulverização; e da mistura do vírus com óleo mineral. As parcelas consistiram de 28 fileiras de soja com 10 m de comprimento e espaçamento de 40 cm, adotando-se delineamento de blocos completamente casualizados, com quatro repetições. As amostragens foram realizadas pelo método do pano, determinando-se o número de lagartas infectadas pelo vírus (LI). As formulações comerciais produzidas pela Nitral, Nova Era, Coodetec e Embrapa controlaram adequadamente a praga, em comparação à testemunha; no entanto, foram significativamente inferiores à preparação do vírus obtida por maceração e filtragem de lagartas, demonstrando que essas formulações necessitam aperfeiçoamento.