Did Hunger Defeat the Confederacy?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Did Hunger Defeat the Confederacy? Andrew F. Smith DID HUNGER DEFEAT THE CONFEDERACY? etters, diaries, newspapers, and Southern Scarcity governmental communiques Prior to the Civil War, the prairies of the written in the South during the Midwest were opened for settlement, and L Americans began to convert vast new areas into Civil War increasingly mention food agricultural land. At the same time, the Mississippi shortages, hunger, and fears of famine River system provided Midwesterners with an easy as the war progressed. Reminiscences route over which to send their agricultural goods written after the war concur with to the South. As a result, it became less costly these contemporary accounts. As Basil and more efficient for the plantation owners to Gildersleeve, a Confederate officer and purchase food from Midwestern farmers than to grow it themselves.2 During the two decades later a classics professor at Johns Hopkins before the war, the Midwest thus supplied SOWING AND University, wrote retrospectively: “Hunger considerable food to the South. REAPING. Left: “Southern was the dominant note of life in the When the war began, the Federal women hound their men Confederacy, civil as well as military.”1 government imposed a blockade on the on to rebellion.” Right: Confederacy to stop the export of cotton and “Southern women feeling Why did the South—the preeminent the effects of rebellion and agricultural region of the nation—suffer the import of military equipment and supplies into states that had seceded. The blockade had creating bread riots.” from hunger, and what effect did this have (Frank Leslie’s Newspaper, a crucial unintended consequence: it greatly May 23, 1863) on the outcome of the Civil War? reduced the amount of foodstuffs going into the 40 NORTH & SOUTH MAY 2011・VOL.13・NUMBER 1 DID HUNGER DEFEAT Confederacy. policies also contributed to decreased food Confederate leaders were well aware of the production. Impressment (confiscating South’s reliance on imported food, and from agricultural goods to feed the troops), for THE CONFEDERACY? the beginning of the war, they encouraged instance, discouraged Southern farmers from Southerners to increase the production of growing surplus food. Meanwhile, Southern Former Confederate staples. Plantations, powered by slaves, answered economic policies produced hyperinflation, officer Basil Lanneau the call by decreasing cotton production which made food hoarding and speculation Gildersleeve wrote after the and increasing food crops. As a result, food inevitable. The most rational economic behavior war that “Hunger was the dominant note of life in the production on southern plantations soared was to buy and store commodities, whose values Confederacy, civil as well as during the first year of the conflict. It was a at least kept pace with inflation. Financially, it well as military.” different story on smaller farms, however. With was in the best interest of those with Confederate a large percentage of southern men under arms, currency to exchange it as quickly as possible for there were far fewer farm laborers to work the commodities, which could be stored and sold at land. As agricultural historian Charles Ramsdell a later time for more money. wrote of Southern agriculture, “There were large Because the Union blockade prevented coastal sections of the country—the small farm sections, shipping and Union gunboats patrolled rivers, primarily—almost bare of agricultural labor. railroads took on a crucial role for transporting The result was a marked decline in production.”3 goods, troops and military equipment. Before Moreover, as Federal armies steadily gained the war, the South had imported virtually all of control of Confederate territory, many food its railroad equipment. When the war began the producing areas were cut off, contributing to an Confederacy thus had few factories that could even greater decline in total food production. build train engines, rolling stock, rail track or The war also devastated agricultural areas still the machinery and equipment needed to sustain within the Confederacy—such as northern the region’s transportation needs. Moreover, Virginia, much of Louisiana, and northern the Confederate government made no effort to Mississippi— and this too reduced Southern launch such efforts nor did it encourage private food production. To avoid the fighting, enterprise to do so. Early in the conflict the plantation owners near Union lines moved their South also failed to centralize its railroads so that households and slaves further into the interior, they might run more efficiently, and it did not which removed yet more productive agricultural encourage blockade runners to bring in heavy land from cultivation and also brought equipment for railroads, when doing so might more hungry mouths deeper into the South. have made a difference. Meanwhile, slaves who remained on plantations The Confederacy did appoint a railroad czar became less willing to work, especially if who had little authority or power. In December plantation owners and their overseers were away 1861 he requested that the Confederate fighting the war. Other slaves headed for Union government exempt skilled railroad men lines, seeking whatever opportunities were from conscription, and supply much needed available. By the war’s end, the total number of equipment to repair the railroads. If this were former slaves behind Union lines numbered one not done, he warned, “the railroads will very million, many of whom joined the Union army soon be quite unable to meet requirements of or worked on Union-controlled plantations.4 Government.” More than a year later, in April Beginning in the second year of the war, the loss of agricultural areas and the loss of farm laborers began to affect agricultural production. Bad weather added to the Confederacy’s subsistence problems by significantly decreasing grain production in the South. Less grain meant Cotton production on less feed for animals, which caused a decrease in plantations was curbed, and meat production. the production of staples expanded. But no means Weather, refugees and loss of agricultural was found to get the excess land weren’t the only reasons for the food to the areas that Confederacy’s growing food crisis. Confederate needed it. VOL.13・NUMBER 1・MAY 2011 NORTH & SOUTH 41 On November 17, 1862, Confederate Secretary of War George W. Randolph resigned, after less than eight months in office, as a result of Jefferson Davis’s refusal to countenance trading with the enemy in order to subsist the army. 1863, the Richmond Sentinel provisions. This idea had been raised early in the conflict, but pointed to transportation as Confederate President Jefferson Davis opposed it, believing the bottleneck in the supply it would demoralize civilians as well as the army. On October system, and recommended that 30, 1862, the Confederate Secretary of War, George W. the Southern railways be coordinated by a “master mind” in Randolph, sent a letter to Jefferson Davis stating that “the order to transport provisions from where they were grown Army cannot be subsisted without permitting trade to some to where they were needed.5 But these suggestions, which extent with Confederate ports in the possession of the enemy. had been made by others, fell flat because of the laissez faire The alternative is thus presented of violating our established economic policies of the Confederate government. policy of withholding cotton from the enemy or of risking As a result, southern railroads slowly deteriorated, making the starvation of our armies.”9 Davis refused to sanction the food distribution increasingly difficult. When the main trade, and Randolph resigned. railroad lines began to give out, Southerners cannibalized On January 3, 1863, the new Secretary of War, James smaller trunk lines, decreasing the total number of miles A. Seddon, diplomatically told President Davis that “The served by the railroads, thus weakening the overall system. harvests of the past season have not generally proved Even when not interdicted by Union soldiers, the railroads propitious, and notwithstanding the much larger breadth of could not transport enough food to feed civilians, the land devoted to the culture of cereals and forage the product military, cavalry horses, and draft animals. Moreover, when in many extensive districts of the Confederacy is below food was available, inefficiencies in transportation prevented the average, and in some threatens scarcity.” Davis paid no adequate distribution. Civil War railroad historian George attention. Shortly after, in February 1863, the editor of the Edgar Turner concluded that “Tons of bacon, rice, sugar and Daily Southern Crisis, a newspaper published in Jackson, other perishable foods spoiled in accumulated masses while Mississippi, put it less diplomatically: “There is more to fear soldiers in near-by Virginia famished for want of them.” from a dearth of food than from all the Federal armies in Historian Charles W. Ramsdell pointed out that Lee’s army existence.” He then asked, “Who can fight starvation with starved, “not because there was no food in the Confederacy, hope of success?”10 for it was plentiful in many portions of Georgia, Alabama, The failure to solve the Confederate food problems led and Florida, but because the railroads simply could not carry to a series of bread riots that shook much of the eastern enough of it.” When Petersburg and Richmond were cut off, Confederacy beginning in 1863. With the exception of such and “the remnant of the feeble roads wrecked by Sherman’s events in Richmond and Mobile, the Southern bread riots destructive march through Georgia and the Carolinas,” were relatively small affairs, and authorities dealt with them Ramsdell continued, “the stoppage of all supplies followed, easily and with no deaths and few injuries. Nevertheless, and the long struggle was over.”6 the riots reflected real problems in the South and provided The South also had problems with its roads and wagon additional wake-up calls for Confederate leaders to address transportation. Southern roads were mainly unimproved, crucial problems with the Southern food system.
Recommended publications
  • List of Staff Officers of the Confederate States Army. 1861-1865
    QJurttell itttiuetsity Hibrary Stliaca, xV'cni tUu-k THE JAMES VERNER SCAIFE COLLECTION CIVIL WAR LITERATURE THE GIFT OF JAMES VERNER SCAIFE CLASS OF 1889 1919 Cornell University Library E545 .U58 List of staff officers of the Confederat 3 1924 030 921 096 olin The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030921096 LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES ARMY 1861-1865. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1891. LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE ARMY. Abercrombie, R. S., lieut., A. D. C. to Gen. J. H. Olanton, November 16, 1863. Abercrombie, Wiley, lieut., A. D. C. to Brig. Gen. S. G. French, August 11, 1864. Abernathy, John T., special volunteer commissary in department com- manded by Brig. Gen. G. J. Pillow, November 22, 1861. Abrams, W. D., capt., I. F. T. to Lieut. Gen. Lee, June 11, 1864. Adair, Walter T., surg. 2d Cherokee Begt., staff of Col. Wm. P. Adair. Adams, , lieut., to Gen. Gauo, 1862. Adams, B. C, capt., A. G. S., April 27, 1862; maj., 0. S., staff General Bodes, July, 1863 ; ordered to report to Lieut. Col. R. G. Cole, June 15, 1864. Adams, C, lieut., O. O. to Gen. R. V. Richardson, March, 1864. Adams, Carter, maj., C. S., staff Gen. Bryan Grimes, 1865. Adams, Charles W., col., A. I. G. to Maj. Gen. T. C. Hiudman, Octo- ber 6, 1862, to March 4, 1863. Adams, James M., capt., A.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Finegan
    Fall 2011 First we built a Sand Castle. Then we found our HOME. Discover what it’s like to own a piece of the island. Contact us today to learn about home and villa ownership opportunities in Amelia Island Plantation, the premier oceanfront resort community located on the picturesque shores of North Florida, just minutes from Jacksonville. Call 800-305-6157 or visit aipfl.com/realestate to learn more. 3.5 miles of beach • 7 miles of nature trails • Resort pools • Golf • Tennis • Fitness center • Spa • Clubhouse Homes | Homesites | Villas ©2011 Amelia Island Plantation OMAI-2000E_5x8_AmNow_F.indd 1 5/9/11 2:07 PM Fall Break Take a fall break on Amelia Island and enjoy the many special events and activities scheduled over the next three months. Live music will be plentiful at both the Amelia Island Blues Festival (Sep. 16-17) and the Amelia Island Jazz Festival (Oct. 2-9). For sports fans, the annual Florida- Georgia football game in Jacksonville (Oct. 29) is a can't miss event. And for the fourth consecutive year, the Petanque America Open will come to Historic Downtown Fernandina (Nov. 11-13). More fall event information can be found starting on page 8. Please consult the map on page 20 to help find your way around the island. Amelia Now is a quarterly magazine published by Charles Litrico, P. O. Box 1495, Fernandina Beach, FL 32035. Phone (904) 583-3216. ©Charles Litrico 2011. Cover photo by Charles Litrico. Photos this page: Amelia Island Jazz Festival by Caroline Blochlinger; beach by Charles Litrico; fishermen by Terry Lacoss.
    [Show full text]
  • VOL. XLIX, NO. 8 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 August 2009
    VOL. XLIX, NO. 8 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 August 2009 On Thursday, January 10, 1861, the Florida State Convention in Tallahassee passed an Ordinance of Secession by a vote of 62-7, thus becoming the third state to leave the Union. That night in Tallahassee a large torchlight parade celebrated the event. Secession had been on the minds of most Floridians for some time. Governor Madison Starke Perry had urged reorganization and rearming of the state militia following John Brown’s October, 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry. At the same time he called for an “external separation from those whose wickedness and fanaticism forbid us longer to live with them in peace and safety.” He later warned Floridians to prepare for the “emergency of the approaching [1860] Presidential election,” and announced Florida’s readiness to “wheel into line with the gallant Palmetto State, or any other Cotton State….” Of the eleven Confederate states Florida’s population was the smallest, showing 140,424 in the 1860 Census. Of this number 77,747 were white, 61,745 black with 932 Free Negroes. The state would furnish 21 military organizations— 14,000 to 15,000 men—to the Confederacy. Over 1300 would be killed or died of wounds, and 1100 more died of disease. About 1200 white Floridians and almost as many blacks served in Federal armies. The 1500-mile Florida coastline would prove problematic for both sides: the North in trying to blockade it, the South in its attempt to defend it. Cattle and salt were two of Florida’s primary substances for the Confederacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacksonville During the Civil War
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 41 Number 4 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 41, Article 5 Issue 4 1962 Jacksonville During the Civil War Samuel Proctor Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Proctor, Samuel (1962) "Jacksonville During the Civil War," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 41 : No. 4 , Article 5. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol41/iss4/5 Proctor: Jacksonville During the Civil War JACKSONVILLE DURING THE CIVIL WAR by SAMUEL PROCTOR HE YEAR 1860 was one of political unrest and agitation in T Florida. Most Southerners argued with an unyielding passion that secession had become a matter of necessity and that inde- pendence was the only possible course of action for the South. A political meeting in Jacksonville on May 15, 1860, overwhelm- ingly resolved: “We are of the opinion that the right of the citi- zens of Florida are no longer safe in the Union and we think she should raise the banner of secession and invite her southern sis- ters to join her.” 1 The Jacksonville Standard, on July 26, 1860, announced that if “in consequence of Northern fanaticism the irrepressible conflict must come we are prepared to meet it.” The presidential election of November 7, 1860, climaxed this year of fierce political strife.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Olustee: Its Meaning for the British
    Florida Historical Quarterly Volume 43 Number 3 Florida Historical Quarterly, Vol 43, Article 3 Number 3 1964 The Battle of Olustee: Its Meaning for the British Lawrence E. Breeze [email protected] Part of the American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Historical Quarterly by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Breeze, Lawrence E. (1964) "The Battle of Olustee: Its Meaning for the British," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 43 : No. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/fhq/vol43/iss3/3 Breeze: The Battle of Olustee: Its Meaning for the British THE BATTLE OF OLUSTEE: ITS MEANING FOR THE BRITISH by Lawrence E. Breeze ARLY IN FEBRUARY 1864, Major General Quincy A. Gillmore, commanding the Federal Department of the South with head- quarters at Hilton Head, South Carolina, ordered Brigadier Gen- eral Truman Seymour, commander of the District of Hilton Head, to prepare his forces for a seaborne expedition. 1 Subsequent or- ders, issued after the embarkation of the troops, directed the expe- dition to the east coast of Florida. 2 On February 7, Seymour’s forces reached the mouth of the St. Johns River. They ascended the river to Jacksonville and soon took possession of the town. 3 Meeting only token resistance in the area, they began raiding operations outward from Jacksonville.
    [Show full text]
  • Olustee Observer QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER of the OLUSTEE BATTLEFIED HISTORIC STATE PARK CITIZEN SUPPORT ORGANIZATION
    Olustee Observer QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER OF THE OLUSTEE BATTLEFIED HISTORIC STATE PARK CITIZEN SUPPORT ORGANIZATION Gary Dickinson - President, Tom Jesse - Vice-President, Mitzi Nelson - Secretary, Paul Duran - Treasurer, Boardmembers: James Permane, Bill Danforth, Bob Farrar, Tom Fasulo, David Richardson, Wilhamena Lauramore, Frank Maloney, Arnold O’Steen, George Scott, Bud Thayer, Jim Bishop th BattleOfOlustee.org Fall 2014 edition November 27 , 2014 DOUBLE HEADLINES!! THE BATTLE OF OLUSTEE 150TH BARNETT FRONCZAK ANNIVERSARY REENACTMENT A BARLOWE ARCHITECTS OF SUCCESS! ONE OF THE HIGHEST TALLAHASSEE SELECTED TO ATTENDANCE NUMBERS EVER. BUILD THE NEW HIGH MARKS ON THE BATTLE BATTLEFIELD MUSEUM, GIFT REENACTMENT! SHOP, & EDUCATION CENTER! As the newsletter resumes publication, it is proud to report two major stories coming from the oldest state park in the perennial award-winning Florida State Park system. First, the highly anticipated reenactment event marking the 150th anniversary of the actual battle came off with very good reviews. Then, the CSO and its museum committee in conjunction with expert representatives from the Park Service, after considerable debate, made what was a difficult decision in a very tight competition between 3 top Florida design firms to build the new museum center. More on this later! “General Seymour sent a flag of truce…with a letter” to Gen. Finegan, requesting that the wounded Federal prisoners be paroled. “A horse-car or ambulance will be sent for the wounded…should this proposal be acceded to”. Gen. Finegan responded, but declined to parole the wounded who he claimed were “properly taken care of, to await the future action of my government”. On the following Friday, another unsuccessful attempt would be made by Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Florida Civil War Heritage Trail
    Florida -CjvjlV&r- Heritage Trail .•""•^ ** V fc till -/foMyfa^^Jtwr^— A Florida Heritage Publication Florida . r li //AA Heritage Trail Fought from 1861 to 1865, the American Civil War was the country's bloodiest conflict. Over 3 million Americans fought in it, and more than 600,000 men, 2 percent of the American population, died in it. The war resulted in the abolition of slavery, ended the concept of state secession, and forever changed the nation. One of the 1 1 states to secede from the Union and join the Confederacy, Florida's role in this momentous struggle is often overlooked. While located far from the major theaters of the war, the state experienced considerable military activity. At one Florida battle alone, over 2,800 Confederate and Union soldiers became casualties. The state supplied some 1 5,000 men to the Confederate armies who fought in nearly all of the major battles or the war. Florida became a significant source of supplies for the Confederacy, providing large amounts of beef, pork, fish, sugar, molasses, and salt. Reflecting the divisive nature of the conflict, several thousand white and black Floridians also served in the Union army and navy. The Civil War brought considerable deprivation and tragedy to Florida. Many of her soldiers fought in distant states, and an estimated 5,000 died with many thousands more maimed and wounded. At home, the Union blockade and runaway inflation meant crippling scarcities of common household goods, clothing, and medicine. Although Florida families carried on with determination, significant portions of the populated areas of the state lay in ruins by the end of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Historic Context and References
    APPENDIX A: HISTORIC CONTEXT AND REFERENCES FROM THE HISTORIC PROPERTIES RESURVEY, CITY OF FERNANDINA BEACH, NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA, BLAND AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2007 Colonial Period, 1565-1821 Founded in the early nineteenth century and incorporated in 1824, Fernandina Beach is one of Florida's oldest cities. The principal city of Nassau County, Fernandina Beach is located on the north end of Amelia Island, which has a colonial heritage associated with early French explorers, the First Spanish period, the British period, and the Second Spanish period. Early French explorers named the island "Isle de Mai" and Pedro Menendez built a fort there in 1567. In 1598 and 1675, Spanish missions built on the island contributed to a larger system implemented by the Spanish Crown to convert the Indians to Catholicism. In 1702, an English incursion from Charleston, South Carolina, attacked St. Augustine, but also invaded an outpost on the island and threatened the missions. Later, in 1735, when James Oglethorpe attempted to secure the St. Marys River as the southern boundary of his new colony, the Georgian scouted the island, which he named Amelia for one of King George II's daughters (Johannes 2000:3-4). Between 1513 and 1763, Spain failed to settle permanently any area of Florida except the immediate environs of St. Augustine. Besides establishing a permanent base at the port city and a chain of missions into the interior, the Spanish accomplished little of lasting significance. Farmers and ranchers cleared land for cattle, and planted crops and fruit trees. But, the growth of English colonies to the north in the 1700s and forays by settlers and militia into Florida destabilized Spain's nascent agricultural economy and mission system.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Florida Cavalry (US): Union Enlistment in the Civil War's Southern Periphery
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2018 The First Florida Cavalry (US): Union Enlistment in the Civil War's Southern Periphery Tyler Campbell University of Central Florida Part of the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Campbell, Tyler, "The First Florida Cavalry (US): Union Enlistment in the Civil War's Southern Periphery" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 5819. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5819 THE FIRST FLORIDA CAVALRY (US): UNION ENLISTMENT IN THE CIVIL WAR’S SOUTHERN PERIPHERY by TYLER CAMPBELL B.A. University of Central Florida, 2014 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2018 ABSTRACT In 1863, along the southern periphery of the American Civil War, a Union Brigadier General began recruiting Southern white men into a Union cavalry regiment known as the First Florida Cavalry (US). This study investigates the regiment and those who enlisted in it to show the fluidity of Southern loyalty during the Civil War and the conditions of the Deep South Homefront that existed on the periphery of Union occupation and continue to exist on the periphery of Civil War historiography.
    [Show full text]
  • The Advent of the Spanish-American War in Florida, 1898
    THE ADVENT OF THE SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR IN FLORIDA, 1898 by WILLIAM J. SCHELLINGS N FEBRUARY 1, 1898, the Jacksonville Times Union and Citizen angrily denounced General Nelson Miles for what it termed an attempt to waste the taxpayers’ money. Miles had appeared before a Congressional committee with a plea for funds with which to build fortifications around Washington. The Jack- sonville editor declared that there was “no war in sight,” and that the money might better be spent on the construction of an intra- coastal waterway, a project already looming large in the minds of many Floridians. His denial of any need for defenses was merely another manner of expressing his stubborn opposition to anything that might encourage people to think that war with Spain might result from the Cuban crisis. His attitude on this matter was the same as that of other Florida editors, all of whom believed that war would be harmful to Florida’s future. 1 In the short period of one month it was evident that his attitude had changed. On March 2 the same paper published another editorial on the same subject, the need for coastal forti- fications. This time the editor pointed out that all of Florida’s cities were completely defenseless, and that all of them depended to a large degree on their trade with other ports for their liveli- hood. He also pointed out that in the event of war with Spain, these same cities would be more exposed to attack than any others, simply because of the fact that they were so close to Cuba.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Civil War Generals
    BIOGRAPHIES OF FLORIDA’S CIVIL WAR GENERALS JAMES PATTON ANDERSON Major-General James Patton Anderson was born in Tennes- see about 1820. Like other en- terprising Americans he lived in so many different sections of the Union that it is a diffi- cult matter to decide to which State he really should be assigned in this record of Confederate generals. At the opening of the Mexi- can war he was living in Mississippi and became lieutenant-colonel of Mississippi volunteers. Al- though he had not had the advantages of an educa- tion at the United States military academy, the Mexi- can conflict proved a good school for him in the military art. The good use he made of his opportu- nities in that practical military training school was afterward evidenced by the skill with which he man- aged troops upon the great arena of war from 1861 to 1865. The man who obtained a good reputation on that great theater of action had to keep abreast of many illustrious men of the same rank with him- self, and that is what General Anderson did. After the close of the Mexican war General Anderson lived for a time in Olympia, in what was then Wash- ington Territory, and served as territorial delegate to the national House of Representatives in 1855. eBooksOnDisk.com eBooksOnDisk.com Before the opening of the Confederate war he had removed to Florida, and as a citizen of Jefferson county he was a member of the secession conven- tion. Feeling, as did most Southern men, that the South was right, he entered heart and soul into the struggle to maintain Southern rights and honor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Florida Historical Quarterly
    COVER Downtown DeLand, ca. 1890s. Miller’s Feed & Hardware, corner New York Avenue and the Boulevard. Reproduced from A Pictorial History of West Volusia County, 1870-1940, by William J. Dreggors, Jr., and John Stephen Hess. The Volume LXIX, Number October 1990 THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY COPYRIGHT 1990 by the Florida Historical Society, Tampa, Florida. The Florida Historical Quarterly (ISSN 0015-4113) is published quarterly by the Florida Historical Society, Uni- versity of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, and is printed by E. O. Painter Printing Co., DeLeon Springs, Florida. Second-class postage paid at Tampa and DeLeon Springs, Florida. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to the Florida Historical Society, P. O. Box 290197, Tampa, FL 33687. THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY Samuel Proctor, Editor Canter Brown, Jr., Editorial Assistant EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD David R. Colburn University of Florida Herbert J. Doherty University of Florida Michael V. Gannon University of Florida John K. Mahon University of Florida (Emeritus) Joe M. Richardson Florida State University Jerrell H. Shofner University of Central Florida Charlton W. Tebeau University of Miami (Emeritus) Correspondence concerning contributions, books for review, and all editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor, Florida Historical Quarterly, Box 14045, University Station, Gainesville, Florida 32604-2045. The Quarterly is interested in articles, and documents pertaining to the history of Florida. Sources, style, footnote form, original- ity of material and interpretation, clarity of thought, and in- terest of readers are considered. All copy, including footnotes, should be double-spaced. Footnotes are to be numbered con- secutively in the text and assembled at the end of the article.
    [Show full text]