DOCSLIB.ORG

17090 NAE Bridge Spr 01

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
17090 NAE Bridge Spr 01 The BRIDGE National Academy of Engineering George M. C. Fisher, Chair Wm. A. Wulf, President Sheila E. Widnall, Vice President W. Dale Compton, Home Secretary Harold K. Forsen, Foreign Secretary Paul E. Gray, Treasurer Editor-in-Chief George Bugliarello (Interim) The Bridge (USPS 551-240) is published quarterly by the National Academy of Engineering, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Periodicals postage paid at Washington, D.C. Vol. 31, No. 1, Spring 2001 Editor: Greg Pearson (Interim) Production Assistants: Penelope Gibbs, Kimberly West Postmaster—Send address changes to The Bridge, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Papers are presented in The Bridge on the basis of general interest and timeliness in connection with issues associated with engineering. They reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the National Academy of Engineering. The Bridge is printed on recycled paper. © 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. A complete copy of each issue of The Bridge is available online at http://www.nae.edu/TheBridge in PDF format. Some of the arti- cles in this issue are also available as HTML documents and may contain links to related sources of information, multimedia files, or other content. The VOLUME 31, NUMBER 1 SPRING 2001 BRIDGE Editorial 3 3 Brad Allenby Earth Systems Engineering Features 5 5 George Bugliarello Rethinking Urbanization Balancing the biological, social, and machine elements of modern cities will be key to creating environmentally sustainable, emotionally satisfying urban centers of the future. 13 Robert M. White Climate Systems Engineering Forestalling the projected adverse effects of climate change presents an immense and complex challenge to the engineering profession. 18 Geeta Pradhan and Hybrid Cities: A Basis for Hope Rajesh K. Pradhan Combining the best features of city and country life in one place can create the diversity and sense of commu- nity needed to nurture creativity and innovation. NAE News and Notes 24 24 Class of 2001 Elected 29 Draper, Russ Recipients Honored 30 NAE Hosts Draper Forum for Students 30 Gordon Prize Launched 31 NAE Treasurer Gray to Step Down 32 From the Home Secretary 33 NAE Thanks Donors 38 Committee on Engineering Education Adds Staff 38 NAE Fellow on Board 39 NAE Newsmakers 40 NAE Calendar of Meetings 41 In Memoriam National Research Council Update 42 42 High-Tech Labor Squeeze 43 An Agenda for Environmental Sciences Publications of Interest 44 National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Engineering Institute of Medicine National Research Council The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter grant- ed to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Acad- emy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Acade- my of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and tech- nology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal oper- ating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the pub- lic, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council. Editorial Earth Systems of projects within the city but learning how to engineer Engineering the city as an organic whole, along its three dimen- The National Acad- sions: biological, social, and machine. emy of Engineering’s The challenges that this poses to engineering—in annual meeting tech- scale, complexity, and multidisciplinarity—are appar- nical session last Octo- ent. Moreover, they will grow as the complexity and ber was, as always, power of our technologies grow. What will be the informative and enter- impact on the city of biotechnology, information taining. But it was also technology, and nanotechnology? At what scales will noteworthy, for it functionality, such as energy or water services, best be introduced a new provided? adventure for engi- White discusses an issue on many people’s minds neers and the engi- these days, climate change, but does so from an ESE Brad Allenby is environment, perspective. He thus introduces what may be the first health and safety vice presi- neering professions: branch of ESE: climate systems engineering (CSE). dent at AT&T, an adjunct Earth systems engi- professor at Columbia Uni- neering (ESE). ESE, The couplings between human systems and complex versity’s School of Interna- as I define it, is the natural systems, including not just atmospheric tional and Public Affairs, study and practice of dynamics, but also the carbon, hydrological, and and the inaugural Batten engineering human oceanic systems as well, are both apparent and quite Fellow at the Darden Gradu- technology systems in complex in this instance. ate School of Business at the such a way as to pro- Moreover, the climate change issue is pervaded by University of Virginia. The vide the required engineering and technology, from the systems that views expressed in this editor- functionality while generate greenhouse gases to the systems that enable ial are the author’s alone. facilitating the active us to perceive relevant changes in natural systems in management of the the first place to the technologies that can mitigate dynamics of strongly coupled fundamental natural such impacts. In this regard, the lack of a robust tech- systems. nology dimension to existing global climate change The articles in this issue, based on presentations negotiations is both noteworthy and dysfunctional. It made at the technical session, begin to flesh out that is to be hoped that this gap will be addressed in any definition. In the process, several themes that continuing process intended to address global climate undoubtedly will characterize any ESE discourse can change. already be discerned: the need for the designer of What roles, for example, can biotechnology, infor- technology systems, and society as a whole, to assume mation technology, and new energy technologies such ethical responsibility for both artifact and systems as active carbon sequestration play in enabling devel- effects; the role of technology as an absolutely critical opment, especially in emerging countries, while at the element of social response to environmental pertur- same time reducing anthropogenic climate change bations; and the significance of complexity, not only forcing? of the technical systems, but also of the environmen- That this and related questions have not even been tal, social, and cultural systems to which they are asked yet is a serious indictment of the existing process inevitably coupled. and probably reflects a profound lack of understand- Bugliarello provides an ESE vision of cities as places ing of technological evolution on the part of many par- where technology, population, culture, economics, ties currently engaged in such negotiations. CSE clear- and natural systems intersect and interact. He calls for ly poses a profound challenge for engineering going rethinking the city in terms of efficiency, manageabili- forward, and an active role for the Academy in this ty, and (especially emotional) quality of life. The area would be entirely appropriate. approach requires not just the traditional engineering Pradhan and Pradhan urge the redefinition of cities The BRIDGE 4 in an attempt to capture the benefits of both large and dialog by questioning accepted “opposing concepts” is small scale, of the urban center and the village. Some a productive and necessary first step. may feel that reconceptualizing big cities as conglom- Humans will exist within complex systems, both erations of small towns can hinder, rather than sup- social and natural,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 C35 SE 046 420 International
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 C35 SE 046 420 TITLE International Cooperation in Science. Science Policy Study--Hearings Volume 7. Hearings before the Task Force on Science Policy of the Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session (June 18, 19, 20, 27, 1985). No. 50. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. House Committee on Science and Technology. PUB DATE 85 NOTE 1,147p.; Photographs and pages containing small and light print may not reproduce well. For related documents, see SE 046 411-413 and SE 046 419. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (09G) EDRS PRICE MF08/PC46 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Financial Support; Hearings; Higher Education; *International Cooperation; *International Programs; Mathematics; Physics; Policy Formation; *Program Content; Psychology; Research Needs; *Sciences; *Scientific Research; *Technology; Training IDENTIFIERS Congress 99th; *Science Policy; UNESCO ABSTRACT These hearings on international cooperation in science focused on three issues: (1) international cooperation in big science; (2) the impact of international cooperation on research priorities; and (3) coordination in management of international cooperative research. Witnesses presenting testimony and/or prepared statements were: Victor Weisskopf; Sandra D. Toye; Walter A. McDougall; Harold Jaffe; Herbert Friedman; Joseph C. Gavin, Jr.; H. Guyford Stever; Kenneth S. Pedersen; John P. McTague (accompanied by Wallace Kornack); Charles Horner (accompanied by Jack Blanchard); John F. Clarke; Eugene Skolnikoff; and Rans-Otto Wuster. Witnesses' questions and answers are also included. Two appendices are provided. The first is the record of the briefing of the task force staff by the American Association for the Advancement of Science Consortium of Affiliates for International Programs (with these participants: Richard D.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Guyford Stever 1916–2010
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES H. GUYFORD S TEVER 1 9 1 6 – 2 0 1 0 A Biographical Memoir by BY T. K E N N E TH F O W L E R Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2010 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. H. GUYFORD STEVER October 24, 1916–April 9, 2010 BY T. KENNET H FOWLER FTER A DISTINGUISHED CAREER OF SERVICe in academia, govern- Ament, and industry, Guy Stever died on April 9, 2010, at his home in Gaithersburg, Maryland. He was 9. During 1965-1976, he served as president of Carnegie Tech, then Carnegie-Mellon University; director of the National Science Foundation; and science adviser to Presidents Nixon and Ford. He was a member of Section 1 of the National Academy of Sciences, elected in 197, having already been elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 1965. He was awarded the National Medal of Science in 1991. I knew Guy best when I served with him on the Fusion Policy Advisory Committee of 1990, which played an important role in enabling Princeton finally to conduct experiments with tritium that yielded the first definitive demonstration of controlled fusion power, in 199. Guy was chair, a frequent role for him after his years in the White House. Just the year before, in 1989, he had completed a far more difficult assignment as chair of a panel overseeing booster-rocket redesign following the Challenger disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugh L. Dryden's Career in Aviation and Space
    MONOGRAPHS IN AREROSPACE HISTORY #5 Hugh Dryden's Career Hugh L. Dryden's Career in Aviation and Space by Michael H. Gorn NASA History Office Code ZH NASA Headquarters Washington, DC 20546 Monographs in Aerospace History Number 5 1996 Hugh Dryden's Career Foreword This account of the life of Dr. Hugh Latimer Dryden is especially appropriate now. The NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) was named in his honor exactly 20 years ago. This year we also celebrate 50 years of flight research here. It is fitting that people associated with the Center, with NASA as a whole, and those outside of NASA who are interested in the history of aviation and space, be reminded of Hugh Dryden’s enormous contributions. Hugh Dryden was a research scientist of the highest order, an aeronautics pioneer, the Director of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), and then the first NASA Deputy Administra- tor. Dr. Hugh Dryden’s special relationship to the Dryden Flight Research Center goes far beyond its name. Among Hugh Dryden’s first actions after becoming the NACA’s Director of Research in September 1947, was to inform Walt Williams, the director of the flight research operation here in the desert, that the NACA Muroc organization, formed the previous year, would now become a permanent facility known as the NACA Muroc Flight Test Unit. Hugh Dryden strongly supported the flight research conducted here with the early rocket-powered aircraft. He represented the NACA on the interagency Research Airplane Committee that supervised the beginnings of the critically important X-15 research at the High Speed Flight Station.
    [Show full text]
  • PURM Revised Manuscript -- Stretching Beyond
    Finding Patterns and Making Predictions: A Dialogue on Mentored Student Research and Engaged Learning Abroad Anthony Hatcher, Ph.D., Elon University, US, [email protected] Mia Watkins, A.B., Elon University, US During the week of April 7-11, 2014, a team of five undergraduate researchers and two mentors from Elon University in Elon, N.C., traveled to Hong Kong to conduct oral history interviews with inductees at the Internet Hall of Fame (IHOF) Induction/International IT Fest 2014. Coverage of IHOF is one of the many joint initiatives of the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project and the Imagining the Internet Center at Elon University. This essay presents an overview of the planning and research processes used by Elon University School of Communications students who interviewed and recorded inductees to the 2014 Internet Hall of Fame. The essay concludes with a dialogue between a professor/mentor, Anthony Hatcher, and one of the student researchers, Mia Watkins, who conducted follow-up research based on the interviewees’ responses. Watkins’ commentary on various stages of the process also appears throughout the essay. About the Imagining the Internet Center A central purpose of Elon’s Imagining the Internet Center is primary source data collection in order to create a permanent, ongoing archive and interactive history of the rapidly evolving world of digital communication, specifically the origins and development of the Internet. These data include video interviews with Internet pioneers involved in significant discoveries and innovations. The Center maintains that learning from past achievements can inform future public policy. The mission of the Imagining the Internet Center is “to explore and provide insights into emerging network innovations, global development, dynamics, diffusion and governance” (Imagining the Internet, n.d.).
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008
    Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Paul Harold Rubinson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War Committee: —————————————————— Mark A. Lawrence, Supervisor —————————————————— Francis J. Gavin —————————————————— Bruce J. Hunt —————————————————— David M. Oshinsky —————————————————— Michael B. Stoff Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War by Paul Harold Rubinson, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 Acknowledgements Thanks first and foremost to Mark Lawrence for his guidance, support, and enthusiasm throughout this project. It would be impossible to overstate how essential his insight and mentoring have been to this dissertation and my career in general. Just as important has been his camaraderie, which made the researching and writing of this dissertation infinitely more rewarding. Thanks as well to Bruce Hunt for his support. Especially helpful was his incisive feedback, which both encouraged me to think through my ideas more thoroughly, and reined me in when my writing overshot my argument. I offer my sincerest gratitude to the Smith Richardson Foundation and Yale University International Security Studies for the Predoctoral Fellowship that allowed me to do the bulk of the writing of this dissertation. Thanks also to the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy at Yale University, and John Gaddis and the incomparable Ann Carter-Drier at ISS.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Engineering Research Centers: Purposes, Goals, and Expectations
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 315 272 SE 051 142 TITLE The New Engineering Research Centers: Purposes, Goals, and Expectations. Symposium (District of Colombia, April 29-30, 1985). INSTITUTION National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council, Washington, DC. Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems. SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, D. REPORT NO ISBN-0-309-03598-8 PUB DATE 86 GRANT NSF-MEG-8505051 NOTE 213p.; Prepared by the Cross-Disciplinary Engineering Research Committee. AVAILABLE FROM National Academy Press, 1201 Constitution Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20418 ($25.95). PUB TYPE Collected Works - Conference Proceedings (021) -- Viewpoints (120) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Engineering; *Engineering Education; *Engineering Technology; *Research Administration; Research and Development; *Research and Development Centers; Research Directors; Research Proposals; Scientific Research IDENTIFIERS *Engineering Research Centers ABSTRACT The aympoisum was held to describe the roots and future plans of the Engineering Research Center's (ERC's) concept and program. The first section of this symposium compilation describes the national goals that the ERCs represent. The second section presents the point of view of the National Science Foundation on the ERCs--the concept behind them, their goals, selection criteria, and mechanisms for support. The next section provides the plans and programs of the six existing centers:(1) Systems Research Center; (2) Center for Intelligent Manufacturin3 Systems;(3) Center for Robotic Systems in Microelectronics; (4) Center for Composites Manufacturing Science and Engineering; (5) Engineering Center for Telecommunications; and (6) Biotechnology Process Engineering Center. Two of the presentations were on exchange methods among the centers and the relationship between engineering.education and research.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE of IDEAS This Work Is Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (US/V3.0)
    less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page i THE FUTURE OF IDEAS This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (US/v3.0). Noncommercial uses are thus permitted without any further permission from the copyright owner. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are administered by Random House. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.randomhouse.com/about/ permissions.html The book maybe downloaded in electronic form (freely) at: http://the-future-of-ideas.com For more permission about Creative Commons licenses, go to: http://creativecommons.org less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page iii the future of ideas THE FATE OF THE COMMONS IN A CONNECTED WORLD /// Lawrence Lessig f RANDOM HOUSE New York less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page iv Copyright © 2001 Lawrence Lessig All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Random House, Inc., New York, and simultaneously in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto. Random House and colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Lessig, Lawrence. The future of ideas : the fate of the commons in a connected world / Lawrence Lessig. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-375-50578-4 1. Intellectual property. 2. Copyright and electronic data processing. 3. Internet—Law and legislation. 4. Information society. I. Title. K1401 .L47 2001 346.04'8'0285—dc21 2001031968 Random House website address: www.atrandom.com Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 24689753 First Edition Book design by Jo Anne Metsch less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page v To Bettina, my teacher of the most important lesson.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Baran, Network Theory, and the Past, Present, and Future of the Internet
    PAUL BARAN, NETWORK THEORY, AND THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF THE INTERNET CHRISTOPHER S. YOO* Paul Baran’s seminal 1964 article “On Distributed Communications Networks” that first proposed packet switching also advanced an underappreciated vision of network architecture: a lattice-like, distributed network, in which each node of the Internet would be homogeneous and equal in status to all other nodes. Scholars who have embraced the concept of a flat network have largely overlooked the extent to which it is inconsistent with network theory, which emphasizes the importance of short cuts and hubs in enabling networks to scale. The flat network is also inconsistent with the actual way the Internet was deployed, which relied on a three- tiered, hierarchical architecture resembling what Baran called a decentralized network. However, empirical studies reveal that the Internet’s architecture is changing; as large content providers build extensive wide area networks and undersea cables to connect directly to last-mile networks, it is in the process of becoming flatter and less hierarchical. This change is making the network become more centralized rather than more distributed. As a result, this article suggests that the standard reference model that places backbones at the center of the architecture may need to be replaced with a radically different vision: a stack of centralized star networks, each centered on one of the leading content providers. INTRODUCTION................................................................................. 162 I. BARAN’S UNREALIZED VISION OF A DISTRIBUTED NETWORKS 164 A. Baran’s Vision of a Distributed Network ........................ 164 B. The Partial Reception of Baran’s Vision ......................... 167 II. NETWORK SCIENCE’S INSIGHTS INTO THE BENEFITS OF NETWORKS ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marconi Society - Wikipedia
    9/23/2019 Marconi Society - Wikipedia Marconi Society The Guglielmo Marconi International Fellowship Foundation, briefly called Marconi Foundation and currently known as The Marconi Society, was established by Gioia Marconi Braga in 1974[1] to commemorate the centennial of the birth (April 24, 1874) of her father Guglielmo Marconi. The Marconi International Fellowship Council was established to honor significant contributions in science and technology, awarding the Marconi Prize and an annual $100,000 grant to a living scientist who has made advances in communication technology that benefits mankind. The Marconi Fellows are Sir Eric A. Ash (1984), Paul Baran (1991), Sir Tim Berners-Lee (2002), Claude Berrou (2005), Sergey Brin (2004), Francesco Carassa (1983), Vinton G. Cerf (1998), Andrew Chraplyvy (2009), Colin Cherry (1978), John Cioffi (2006), Arthur C. Clarke (1982), Martin Cooper (2013), Whitfield Diffie (2000), Federico Faggin (1988), James Flanagan (1992), David Forney, Jr. (1997), Robert G. Gallager (2003), Robert N. Hall (1989), Izuo Hayashi (1993), Martin Hellman (2000), Hiroshi Inose (1976), Irwin M. Jacobs (2011), Robert E. Kahn (1994) Sir Charles Kao (1985), James R. Killian (1975), Leonard Kleinrock (1986), Herwig Kogelnik (2001), Robert W. Lucky (1987), James L. Massey (1999), Robert Metcalfe (2003), Lawrence Page (2004), Yash Pal (1980), Seymour Papert (1981), Arogyaswami Paulraj (2014), David N. Payne (2008), John R. Pierce (1979), Ronald L. Rivest (2007), Arthur L. Schawlow (1977), Allan Snyder (2001), Robert Tkach (2009), Gottfried Ungerboeck (1996), Andrew Viterbi (1990), Jack Keil Wolf (2011), Jacob Ziv (1995). In 2015, the prize went to Peter T. Kirstein for bringing the internet to Europe. Since 2008, Marconi has also issued the Paul Baran Marconi Society Young Scholar Awards.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Amendment, Common Carriers, and Public Accommodations: Net Neutrality, Digital Platforms, and Privacy
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 2021 The First Amendment, Common Carriers, and Public Accommodations: Net Neutrality, Digital Platforms, and Privacy Christopher S. Yoo University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Digital Communications and Networking Commons, First Amendment Commons, Internet Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Policy Commons Repository Citation Yoo, Christopher S., "The First Amendment, Common Carriers, and Public Accommodations: Net Neutrality, Digital Platforms, and Privacy" (2021). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 2576. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/2576 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FIRST AMENDMENT, COMMON CARRIERS, AND PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS: NET NEUTRALITY, DIGITAL PLATFORMS, AND PRIVACY Christopher S. Yoo* Recent prominent judicial opinions have assumed that common car- riers have few to no First Amendment rights and that calling an actor a common carrier or public accommodation could justify limiting its right to exclude and mandating that it provide nondiscriminatory access. A re- view of the history reveals that the underlying law is richer than these simple statements would suggest. The principles for determining what constitutes a common carrier or a public accommodation and the level of First Amendment protection both turn on whether the actor holds itself out as serving all members of the public or whether it asserts editorial dis- cretion over whom to carry or host.
    [Show full text]
  • 8/12/76 - Remarks at the Swearing-In of Dr
    The original documents are located in Box 37, “8/12/76 - Remarks at the Swearing-in of Dr. Guyford Stever as Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy” of the President’s Speeches and Statements: Reading Copies at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 37 of President's Speeches and Statements: Reading Copies at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE PRESIDENT HAS SBEN ... REMARKS FOR SWEARING-IN OF DR. STEVER, THURSDAY, AUGUST 12, 1976 I WELCOME THIS DISTINGUISHED GROUP TO THE CABINET ROOM AND TO THIS HISTORIC OCCASION. TODAY I AM ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY, RETURNING FULL TIME SCIENTIFIC ..-- ~ AND TECHNICAL ADVICE TO THE WHITE HOUSE. THE DIRECTOR OF THAT OFFICE, WHO WILL ALSO SERVE AS ADVISER TO THE PRES I DENT ON SC fENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, IS ONE OF THE MOST EMINENT SCHOLARS, SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS IN AMERICA -- DR. GUYFORD STEVER (STEE-VER)e -- : • -2- DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Intelligent Machines at Deere &
    THE 2018 CT HALL OF FAME CES 2019 PREVIEW NOVEMBERDECEMBER 2018 BLOCKCHAIN NEW WAYS TO TRANSACT SMART CARS MONITORING DRIVERS TECH CONNECTING DOCTORS WITH PATIENTS SENIOR VP, INTELLIGENT SOLUTIONS GROUP John Stone Creating Intelligent Machines at Deere & Co. i3_1118_C1_COVER_layout.indd 1 10/24/18 3:50 PM MEET THE MOST IRRESISTIBLE NEW POWER COUPLE EVERYBODY’S TALKING Sharp’s all-new, modern and elegant, built-in wall oven features an edge-to-edge black glass and stainless steel design. The SWA3052DS pairs beautifully with our new SMD2480CS Microwave DrawerTM, the new power couple of style and performance. This 5.0 cu. ft. 240V. built-in wall oven uses True European Convection to cook evenly and heat effi ciently. The 8 pass upper-element provides edge-to-edge performance. Sharp’s top-of-the-line Microwave Drawer™ features Easy Wave Open for touchless operation. Hands full? Simply wave up-and-down near the motion sensor and the SMD2480CS glides open. It’s just the kind of elegant engineering, smart functionality and cutting-edge performance you’d expect from Sharp. NEW TOUCH GLASS CONTROL PANEL EDGE-TO-EDGE, BLACK GLASS & STAINLESS STEEL OPTIONAL 30" EXTENSION KIT SHOWN Simply Better Living www.SharpUSA.com © 2018 Sharp Electronics Corporation. All rights reserved. Sharp, Microwave Drawer™ Oven and all related trademarks are trademarks or regis- tered trademarks of Sharp Corporation and/or its affi liated entities. Product specifi cations and design are subject to change without notice. Internal capacity calculated by measuring maximum width,
    [Show full text]