DOCSLIB.ORG

Defining Boundaries for National Register Properties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NATIONAL REGISTER BULLETIN Technical information on the the National Register of Historic Places: survey, evaluation, registration, and preservation of cultural resources U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Cultural Resources National Register, History and Education DEFINING BOUNDARIES FOR NATIONAL REGISTER PROPERTIES The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation's natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to tribes. This material is partially based upon work conducted under a cooperative agreement with the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers and the U.S. Department of the Interior. Cover: (Top Left) Detail of USGS map showing the National Register boundaries of the Columbia Historic District in Cedarburg, Wisconsin. (Top Right) View of Architect Marcel Breuer's International Style home in Lincoln, Massachusetts. (Ruth Williams) (Bottom Left) View of the Roxborough State Park Archeological District near Waterton, Colorado. (William Tate) (Bottom Right) Detail of a 1987 land survey map definingthe property boundaries of Gunston Hall in Buncombe County, North Carolina. (Blue Ridge Land Surveying, Inc.) NATIONAL REGISTER BULLETIN DEFINING BOUNDARIES FOR NATIONAL REGISTER PROPERTIES BY DONNA J. SEIFERT including Barbara J. Little, Beth L. Savage, and John H. Sprinkle, Jr. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 1995, REVISED 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................................................................. ii CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................................................... iii I. DEFINING BOUNDARIES FOR NATIONAL REGISTER PROPERTIES ................................................................................. 1 Why Boundaries are Important .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Getting Help .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Deciding What to Include ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Factors to Consider ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Selecting Boundaries ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Revising Boundaries ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 II. DOCUMENTING BOUNDARIES .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Completing Section 10, Geographical Data .......................................................................................................................... 5 The Verbal Boundary Description and Boundary Justification ........................................................................................ 5 Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) References ............................................................................................................. 6 Global Positioning System (GPS) ........................................................................................................................................... 6 III. CASE STUDIES ................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Boundaries for Buildings ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Buildings in Urban Settings ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Buildings in Rural Settings ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Boundaries for Historic Districts .......................................................................................................................................... 12 Contiguous Districts in Urban Settirigs ................................................................................................................ 13 Discontiguous Districts in Urban Settings ........................................................................................................... 16 Contiguous Districts in Rural Settings .................................................................................................................. 17 Discontiguous Districts in Rural Settings ............................................................................................................. 23 Parks as Districts ....................................................................................................................................................... 23 Boundaries for Particular Property Types .......................................................................................................................... 27 Traditional Cultural Properties .............................................................................................................................. 27 Mining Proper hes ..................................................................................................................................................... 27 Boundaries for Archeological Sites and Districts .............................................................................................................. 30 Archeological Sites ................................................................................................................................................... 31 Contiguous Archeological Districts ....................................................................................................................... 33 Discontiguous Archeological Districts .................................................................................................................. 34 Shipwreck Sites ......................................................................................................................................................... 35 Boundaries for Historic Sites ................................................................................................................................................ 36 Boundaries for Objects ........................................................................................................................................................... 40 Boundaries for Structures ...................................................................................................................................................... 41 IV. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................................................. 45 V. NATIONAL REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION ........................................................................................................ 46 VI. NATIONAL REGISTER BULLETINS ......................................................................................................................................... 47 APPENDIX: Definition of National Register Boundaries for Archeological Properties (formerly National Register Bulletin 12: Definition of National Register Boundaries for Archeological Properties) ....................... 48 PREFACE The National Register of Historic document, and register significant This bulletin was prepared by Places is the official Federal list of properties. This bulletin is designed Donna J. Seifert, archeologist, under a districts, sites, buildings, structures, to help preparers properly select, cooperative agreement between the and objects significant in American define, and document boundaries for National Conference of State Historic history, architecture, archeology, National Register listings and deter­ Preservation Officers and the Na­ engineering, and culture. National minations of eligibility. It includes tional Park Service. Register properties have significance basic guidelines for selecting bound­ in the prehistory or history of their aries to assist the preparer in complet­ Carol D. Shull community, State, or the nation. The ing the National Register Registration Keeper, National Register is maintained by the Form. Examples of a variety of National Register of Historic Places National Park Service on behalf of the property types are presented. These National Park Service Secretary of the Interior. examples illustrate several ways to U.S. Department of the Interior National Register Bulletins provide address boundary issues. guidance on how to identify, evaluate, ii CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This bulletin addresses
Recommended publications
  • Mapping and Cadastral Geographic Information System (GIS) Handbook

    Mapping and Cadastral Geographic Information System (GIS) Handbook

    The Mapping & Cadastral Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Handbook National Wildlife Refuge System Division of Realty Cadastral Data Working Group August 2018 Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 What is the purpose of The Mapping and Cadastral Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Handbook? .......................................................................................... 5 1.2 What are the objectives of this handbook? ............................................................ 5 1.3 What is the scope of the handbook? ...................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 - Authority and History .................................................................................... 6 2.1 What are the authorities for this chapter? .............................................................. 6 2.2 What is the history of the FWS Cartography and Cadastral GIS program? ........... 6 Chapter 3 – Organization, Administration, Requirements ............................................... 9 3.1 What is the organization and administration of the Service cartographers? .......... 9 3.2 What are the duties of the Chief Cartographer and Regional Realty Cartographers? ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2.A Chief Cartographer .......................................................................................... 9 3.2.B Regional Realty
  • University of Oklahoma

    University of Oklahoma

    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE ALTERNATE PATHWAYS TO RITUAL POWER: EVIDENCE FOR CENTRALIZED PRODUCTION AND LONG-DISTANCE EXCHANGE BETWEEN NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CADDO COMMUNITIES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By SHAWN PATRICK LAMBERT Norman, Oklahoma 2017 ALTERNATE PATHWAYS TO RITUAL POWER: EVIDENCE FOR CENTRALIZED PRODUCTION AND LONG-DISTANCE EXCHANGE BETWEEN NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CADDO COMMUNITIES A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Patrick Livingood, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Asa Randall ______________________________ Dr. Amanda Regnier ______________________________ Dr. Scott Hammerstedt ______________________________ Dr. Diane Warren ______________________________ Dr. Bonnie Pitblado ______________________________ Dr. Michael Winston © Copyright by SHAWN PATRICK LAMBERT 2017 All Rights Reserved. Dedication I dedicate my dissertation to my loving grandfather, Calvin McInnish and wonderful twin sister, Kimberly Dawn Thackston. I miss and love you. Acknowledgements First and foremost, I want to give my sincerest gratitude to Patrick Livingood, my committee chair, who has guided me through seven years of my masters and doctoral work. I could not wish for a better committee chair. I also want to thank Amanda Regnier and Scott Hammerstedt for the tremendous amount of work they put into making me the best possible archaeologist. I would also like to thank Asa Randall. His level of theoretical insight is on another dimensional plane and his Advanced Archaeological Theory class is one of the best I ever took at the University of Oklahoma. I express appreciation to Bonnie Pitblado, not only for being on my committee but emphasizing the importance of stewardship in archaeology.
  • Right of Way Manual

    Right of Way Manual

    Right of Way Manual Office of Land Management Updated 07/26/2018 General Index 100 Pre-Acquisition 200 Appraisals 300 Acquisition 400 Relocation Assistance Program 500 Property Management 800 Special Procedures Table of Contents 100 Pre-Acquisition ...................................................................................................................................1 101 Initial Program Development Process ........................................................................................................1 101.1 Background .........................................................................................................................................1 101.2 Policy ...................................................................................................................................................1 101.3 Procedures ..........................................................................................................................................1 102 Project Numbers and Right of Way State Project Numbers .......................................................................3 102.1 Policy ...................................................................................................................................................3 102.2 Procedure ...........................................................................................................................................3 103 Base Maps...................................................................................................................................................4
  • Boundary Disputes

    Boundary Disputes

    BOUNDARY DISPUTES I. FINDING THE SOLUTION TO UNRESOLVED BOUNDARIES. II. HANDLING RIGHT OF WAY PROBLEMS Mark S. Shipman, Esq. Shipman, Sosensky, Randich & Marks, LLC 135 South Road Farmington, CT 06032 Tel. (860) 606-1700 Fax (860) 606-1770 email: [email protected] I. FINDING THE SOLUTION TO UNRESOVED BOUNDARIES Generally. Robert Frost once said that “good fences do good neighbors make”. It is most often true. However, when the fence purports to describe a boundary and it’s in the wrong place, things are often not so neighborly. Fences are among a variety of ways that have been used to delineate the division between adjoining properties. Sometimes they are used as the boundary line and described as such. Other times they are placed subsequently to the division of property, to serve as a visual, if not legal divider. There are other ways to define the confines of particular properties. Boundaries are often mapped. They are described by metes and bounds. They are fixed by reference to markers or points. All of these methods are believed to be effective. Many times they conflict. A boundary is defined as: “Every separation, natural or artificial, which marks the confines or line of division of two contiguous properties. Limits or marks of enclosures if possession be without title, or the boundaries or limits stated in title deed if possession be under a title.” Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition. Boundaries may be natural, such as rocks, trees and rivers. They can be artificial, such as iron pins, merestones, monuments or fences. Today, it is the norm for purchasers and lenders to require surveys.
  • Smith Believes Record Justifies Another Term

    Smith Believes Record Justifies Another Term

    Roots and Shoots: Bagging the longhorned beetle | See page 15 FRIDAY, AUGUST 2, 2013 69 MAIN ST., COLD SPRING, N.Y. | www.philipstown.info Storm King reigns on a summer’s morning | For more Summer Photofest images see page 16. Photo by Kevin Harrison Smith Believes Record Manitou Properties Seeks to Justifies Another Term Turn Plumbush Restaurant into Sees opponent’s criticisms as not serious Pre-K to Grade 6 School were the crime other events. Located just outside of Cold By Kevin E. Foley numbers flowing Philipstown Spring, on Route 9D at Peekskill and the other way. s an incumbent, Putnam County Planning Board Moffatt Roads, the property is in a Town So Smith has a Sheriff Donald B. Smith would ap- of Philipstown hamlet-mixed use zoning right to lay claim gets site plan pear to have the wind at his back district. Manitou Properties does not yet A to success and as he seeks re-election to a fourth term submission own the site, with completion of the sale he proudly touts in office. According to the New York state dependent on site-plan approval. Putnam’s safety By Liz Schevtchuk Department of Criminal Justice Services, Sheriff Smith Photo by K.E. Foley When it met July 25, the Planning record as the Armstrong Putnam County has ranked number one Board declared the proposal a major primary reason in criminal safety for the last three years local business has begun efforts to project (triggering higher level scrutiny), voters should return him to office. This in a row.
  • Applicant's Guide to Boundary Adjustments, Certificates of Compliance and Final Maps

    Applicant's Guide to Boundary Adjustments, Certificates of Compliance and Final Maps

    Applicant’s Guide to Boundary Adjustments, Certificates of Compliance and Final Maps 1. Boundary Adjustment Purpose: To adjust the legal boundaries between two to four legally created parcels. A Boundary Adjustment may not create any new lots, nor may it include any lot not legally created. Application: A Boundary Adjustment Plat must be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer (licensed prior to 1982 with license number lower than 33965) that is able to practice surveying, or a Licensed Land Surveyor and submitted to the Development Services Center with the applicable Certificates of Compliance (COC) or Final Map and fees. Fee: See current fee schedule. 2. Certificate of Compliance Purpose: To establish a particular lot as a legal building site. It does not mean that the lot may necessarily be built upon since it may lack certain amenities, however it does establish a legal lot. A Certificate of Compliance or Parcel/Final Map is required for each lot affected by a Boundary Adjustment. Application: The applicant must submit the completed application to the Development Services Center with the Boundary Adjustment and all applicable fees. Fee: See current fee schedule. 3. Parcel Map and Final Map Purpose: To establish legal lots. This process of establishing lots is usually selected when the Boundary Adjustment and associated easements and encumbrances are completed or right-of- way dedication is proposed. Application: The applicant must provide a complete Parcel Map or Final Map submittal. Fee: See current fee schedule. Boundary Adjustment
  • BOUNDARY LAW and LANDOWNER DISPUTES in TEXAS Boundary Law and Landowner Disputes

    BOUNDARY LAW and LANDOWNER DISPUTES in TEXAS Boundary Law and Landowner Disputes

    BOUNDARY LAW AND LANDOWNER DISPUTES IN TEXAS Boundary Law and Landowner Disputes TABLE OF CONTENTS I. TRESPASS TO TRY TITLE 1 A. History, Purpose And Jurisdiction 1 B. Parties And Procedure 3 1. Parties. 3 2. Pleadings 3 3. Demand for Abstract. 5 II. PARTITION 5 A. Jurisdiction and Parties 5 B. Procedure 5 III. SUIT TO REMOVE CLOUD FROM TITLE OR QUIETING TITLE 7 A. History, Purpose and Jurisdiction 7 B. Evidence in Land Suits 8 C. Common Source 9 D. Adverse Possession 9 E. Prior Possession 12 F. Damages - Good Faith Improvements 13 G. Documentary Evidence 13 IV. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 14 A. Sufficiency of Description 14 B. Priority of Calls 16 V. LITIGATING BOUNDARY DISPUTES 17 A. E.H. Brainard, II, etal. vs. The State of Texas, 12 S.W.3d 6) (Tex. 1999) 17 B. Adverse Possession ~ Hostile claim 17 C. Adverse Possession - Character of Use 17 D. Terrill v. Tuckness, 985 S.W.2d 97 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, n.w.h.) 17 E. Garza v. Maddux, 988 S.W.2d 280 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1999, n.w.h.) 19 F. John G. and Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation v. Dewhurst, 994 S. W.2d 285 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, n.w.h.) 19 G. Wall v. Carrell, 894 S.W.2d 788 (Tex.App.BTyler 1995, writ denied) 19 H. Mohnke v. Greenwood, 915 S.W.2d 585 (Tex.App. - Hou[14th Dist.] 1996, n.w.h.) 20 I. McAllister v. Samuels, 857 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.App. -Houston [14th] 1993, n.w.h.) 21 VI.
  • Butterfield Hospital Phase 1A Literature Review and Sensitivity Analysis

    Butterfield Hospital Phase 1A Literature Review and Sensitivity Analysis

    Appendix J Archaeology Phase 1A Report Butterfield Hospital Phase 1A Literature Review and Sensitivity Analysis Paulding Avenue and Route 9D Town of Cold Spring, Putnam County New York Prepared for: Tim Miller Associates. 10 North Street Cold Spring NY By: CITY/SCAPE: Cultural Resource Consultants 166 Hillair Circle White Plains NY 10605 December 2013 BUTTERFIELD HOSPITAL Paulding Avenue and Route 9D Town of Cold Spring, Putnam County, New York TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Summary Map List Phase 1A Literature Review and Sensitivity Analysis Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Project Area Description ...................................................................................... 1 Environmental Information .................................................................................. 5 Potential for the Site to Contain Prehistoric or Historic Cultural Resources ....... 6 History of the Site ................................................................................................ 6 Butterfield Hospital ........................................................................................... 22 National Register Listed .................................................................................... 25 Additional Research Undertaken ....................................................................... 27 Sensitivity Assessment and Site Prediction ....................................................... 27 Conclusions and Recommendations
  • Massachusetts Massachusetts Office of Travel and Tourism, 10 Park Plaza, Suite 4510, Boston, MA 02116

    Massachusetts Massachusetts Office of Travel and Tourism, 10 Park Plaza, Suite 4510, Boston, MA 02116

    dventure Guide to the Champlain & Hudson River Valleys Robert & Patricia Foulke HUNTER PUBLISHING, INC. 130 Campus Drive Edison, NJ 08818-7816 % 732-225-1900 / 800-255-0343 / fax 732-417-1744 E-mail [email protected] IN CANADA: Ulysses Travel Publications 4176 Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec Canada H2W 2M5 % 514-843-9882 ext. 2232 / fax 514-843-9448 IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: Windsor Books International The Boundary, Wheatley Road, Garsington Oxford, OX44 9EJ England % 01865-361122 / fax 01865-361133 ISBN 1-58843-345-5 © 2003 Patricia and Robert Foulke This and other Hunter travel guides are also available as e-books in a variety of digital formats through our online partners, including Amazon.com, netLibrary.com, BarnesandNoble.com, and eBooks.com. For complete information about the hundreds of other travel guides offered by Hunter Publishing, visit us at: www.hunterpublishing.com All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a re- trieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechani- cal, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. Brief extracts to be included in reviews or articles are permitted. This guide focuses on recreational activities. As all such activities contain ele- ments of risk, the publisher, author, affiliated individuals and companies disclaim any responsibility for any injury, harm, or illness that may occur to anyone through, or by use of, the information in this book. Every effort was made to in- sure the accuracy of information in this book, but the publisher and author do not assume, and hereby disclaim, any liability for loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misleading information or potential travel problems caused by this guide, even if such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause.
  • An Archaeological Survey of the Wabash Valley in Illinois

    An Archaeological Survey of the Wabash Valley in Illinois

    LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY QF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 507 '• r CENTRAL CIRCULATION BOOKSTACKS The person charging this material is re- sponsible for its renewal or its return to the library from which it was borrowed on or before the Latest Date stamped below. You may be charged a minimum fee of $75.00 for each lost book. are reason* Thoft, imtfOaHM, and underlining of bck. dismissal from for dtelpltaary action and may result In TO RENEW CML TELEPHONE CENTER, 333-8400 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN APR 2003 MG 1 2 1997 AUG 2 4 2006 AUG 2 3 1999 AUG 13 1999 1ft 07 WO AU6 23 2000 9 10 .\ AUG 242000 Wh^^ie^i^ $$$ae, write new due date below previous due date. 1*162 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/archaeologicalsu10wint Howard D. Winters s AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OFTHE WABASH VALLEYin Illinois mmm* THE 3 1367 . \ Illinois State Museum STATE OF ILLINOIS Otto Kerner, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION John C. Watson, Director ILLINOIS STATE MUSEUM Milton D. Thompson, Museum Director REPORTS OF INVESTIGATIONS. No. 10 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE WABASH VALLEY IN ILLINOIS by Howard D. Winters Printed by Authority of the State of Illinois Springfield, Illinois 1967 BOARD OF THE ILLINOIS STATE MUSEUM Everett P. Coleman, M.D., Chairman Coleman Clinic, Canton Myers John C.Watson Albert Vice-President, Myers Bros. Director, Department of Springfield Registration and Education Sol Tax, Ph.D., Secretary William Sylvester White of Anthropology Professor Judge, Circuit Court Dean, University Extension Cook County, Chicago University of Chicago Leland Webber C.
  • A History of Tonto National Monument Nancy L

    A History of Tonto National Monument Nancy L

    Western National Parks Association Tucson, Arizona At the Confluence of Change: A History of Tonto National Monument Nancy L. Dallett Western National Parks Association Tucson, Arizona Copyright© 2008 by Nancy L. Dallett Published by Western National Parks Association The net proceeds from WNPA publications support educational and research programs in the national parks. To receive a free catalogue, featuring hundreds of publications, email: [email protected] or visit our online store at www.wnpa.org. Written by Nancy L. Dallett Edited by Melissa Urreiztieta Designed by Simpson & Convent Cover photograph: Lower Cliff Dwelling by Adriel Heisey Printed by Friesens Printed in Canada contents List of Illustrations 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction 1 1 Chapter One: Reclamation. Conservation, and Preservation: Three Currents Converge 17 Chapter Tw-a: One Land, Many Peoples 45 Chapter Three: The Early Years of Tonto National Monument: The Forest Service Era, 1807-1833 67 Chapter Four: The National Park Service Takes Over, 1 833-1 853 87 Chapter Five: A Time of Transition: Mission· BB, 1854-1866 147 Chapter Six: Taking Control: Fences, Science, and Surveys, 1867-1885 171 6 • CONTENTS Chapter Seven: Reclamation, Conservation, and Preservation Revisited: A Mission F.leborn, 1 BBB-2006 1 81 Epilogue 221 Appendix A: American Antiquities Act 223 Appendix B: Tonto National Monument Proclamations 225 Appendix C: Tonto National Monument Custodians and Superintendents 229 Appendix C: Tonto National Monument Visitors Per Year 231 References 233 Index 247 illustrations
  • Southwestern Monuments

    Southwestern Monuments

    SOUTHWESTERN MONUMENTS MONTHLY REPORT DECEMBER 1940 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GPO 25fi528 THE SOUTHWESTERN NAT10UAL IDNUMENTS DECEMBER, 1940.REPORT INDEX OPENING, by Superintendent Hugh M. Miller 337 CONDENSED GENERAL REPORT •Travel Statistics 339 3^0 Activities of Other Agen*> 000 General •. 3U0 cies in the monuments . 3I4.I 100 Administrative 3^0 , I4.CO Interpretation 3^-1 200 Maintenance, New Con- 600 protection ....... 3J42 struction, Improvements . 3Ul- REPORTS FRO?1: MEN IN TH3 FIELD Arches 370 . Navajo. 355- Aztec Ruins 359 Organ Pipe Cactus 351 Bandelier . 373 Pipe Spring 3^3 Canyon de Chelly 3&1 Saguaro 352 Capulin Mountain 3U3 .Sunset Crater 357 Casa Grande 3I4.5 Tonto 3&9 Chaco Canyon 372 Tumacacori. 3^4 Chaco Canyon CCC. , 373 Tuzigoot 3^7 Chiricahua 3^7 Walnut Canyon 358 El !Torro 36I4. V/hite Sands 366 Gran Quivira 353 Wupatki 35^ Hovenweep 359 Yucca House 359 Montezuma Castle 3U9 HEADQUARTERS Branch of Historic Sites . 375 Visitor Statistics 379 Branch of Accounting . .' 38O ' Personnel Notes 38I Branch of Maintenance. 380 THE SUPPLEMENT Compiled Index, April, 1926 to December 19-1.0 inclusive 387 ***** SV/NM* * * * * SOUTHWESTERN NATIONAL- MONUMENTS HEADQUARTERS NATIONAL PARK SERVICE COCLIDGE, ARIZONA 0-0-0-0-0 HUGH M. KILLER, SUPERINTENDENT ACRES FIELD STATION POST OFFICE CUSTODIANS 1940 VISITORS IH APJ.A 1. ARCHES Moab, Utah Henry G. Schmidt 2,5l8 33,6tC.OC 2. AZTEC RUINS Aztec, New !*ex. Thcnas C. Miller 10,550 25.& 3. BANDELIER Santa Fe, N.M. Chester A. Thomas 13,689 26,026.20 4. CANYON DE CHELLY Chin Lee, Ariz.