Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau Ignazio Castellucci
Document generated on 09/30/2021 1:22 p.m. McGill Law Journal Revue de droit de McGill Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau Ignazio Castellucci Volume 57, Number 4, June 2012 Article abstract The article aims to compare the case of the two Chinese Special Administrative URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013028ar Regions (SARs) of Hong Kong and Macau against the theoretical grid developed DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1013028ar by Vernon V. Palmer to describe the “classical” civil law-common law mixed jurisdictions. The results of the research include an acknowledgement of the See table of contents progressive hybridization of the legal systems of Hong Kong and Macau, hailing from the English common law and the Portuguese civil law tradition, respectively, by infiltration of legal models and ideologies from Mainland Publisher(s) China. The research also leads to a critical revision and refinement of the McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill methodology and tools developed by Palmer in order to make them applicable to a wider range of processes of legal hybridization beyond “classical” mixes, ISSN and to a better appreciation of how transitional political and institutional phases play a critical role inlegal “mixity” or hybridity. 0024-9041 (print) 1920-6356 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Castellucci, I. (2012). Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau. McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill, 57(4), 665–720. https://doi.org/10.7202/1013028ar Copyright © Ignazio Castellucci, 2012 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online.
[Show full text]