Scottish Sanitary Survey Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scottish Sanitary Survey Report Scottish Sanitary Survey Report Sanitary Survey Report Brindister Voe SI 023 February 2013 Report Distribution – Brindister Voe Date Name Agency Linda Galbraith Scottish Government Mike Watson Scottish Government David Denoon SEPA Douglas Sinclair SEPA Fiona Garner Scottish Water Alex Adrian Crown Estate Dawn Manson Shetland Island Council Angus Walterson Harvester Sandy Duncan HMMH Alice Mathewson SSQC Partner Organisations The hydrographic assessment and the shoreline survey and its associated report were undertaken by SSQC, Scalloway. i Table of Contents 1. General Description ................................................................ 4 2. Fishery .................................................................................... 6 3. Human Population ................................................................... 8 4. Sewage Discharges .............................................................. 10 5. Agriculture ............................................................................. 13 6. Wildlife .................................................................................. 16 7. Land Cover ........................................................................... 19 8. Watercourses ........................................................................ 21 9. Meteorological data ............................................................... 24 9.1 Rainfall ............................................................................................ 24 9.2 Wind ................................................................................................ 26 10. Classification Information ...................................................... 28 11. Historical E. coli data ............................................................. 29 11.1 Validation of historical data ............................................................. 29 11.2 Summary of microbiological results ................................................. 29 11.3 Overall geographical pattern of results ............................................ 30 11.4 Overall temporal pattern of results .................................................. 31 11.5 Seasonal pattern of results ............................................................. 31 11.6 Analysis of results against environmental factors............................ 33 11.6.1 Analysis of results by recent rainfall ........................................ 33 11.6.2 Analysis of results by tidal height ............................................ 34 11.6.3 Analysis of results by water temperature ................................ 36 11.6.4 Analysis of results by salinity .................................................. 37 11.7 Evaluation of results over 230 E. coli MPN/100 g ........................... 37 11.8 Summary and conclusions .............................................................. 38 12. Designated Shellfish Growing Water Data ............................ 39 13. Bathymetry and Hydrodynamic Assessment ......................... 41 13.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 41 13.2 Bathymetry ...................................................................................... 42 13.3 Field Data ........................................................................................ 45 13.4 Tidal Information ............................................................................. 47 13.5 Currents .......................................................................................... 51 13.6 Salinity ............................................................................................ 65 13.7 Summary ......................................................................................... 68 14. Shoreline Survey Overview ................................................... 70 15. Overall Assessment .............................................................. 73 16. Recommendations ................................................................ 78 17. References ............................................................................ 80 18. List of Figures and Tables ..................................................... 82 ii Appendices 1. General Information on Wildlife Impacts 2. Tables of Typical Faecal Bacteria Concentrations 3. Statistical Data 4. Hydrographic Section Glossary 5. Shoreline Survey Report © Crown Copyright 2013. Food Standards Agency Scotland and Cefas. All rights reserved. iii I. Executive Summary The sanitary survey at Brindister Voe was undertaken due to the risk ranking the area received amongst areas that had not yet been surveyed. Brindister Voe is a narrow inlet on the western coast of Mainland Shetland opens to the Atlantic Ocean in the North and to the south meets the shallow, sheltered lagoons of The Vadills at Uni Firth. Brindister Voe production area contains one long-line mussel farm. At the time of survey it consisted of three long-lines near to the east shore of the voe, one set on the north end of the seabed lease and two set on the southern end. To the north of the production area boundary, a farm consisting of 6 sets of long-lines is used for collection of spat. A small salmon and mussel shore base is located on the northwest shore of the voe. Overall, the Brindister Voe production area is subject to relatively little faecal contamination. The main sources of contamination are varied diffuse sources along the western shoreline. Livestock, wildlife and a failing septic tank contribute to modest faecal contamination of watercourses discharging to the voe along much of the western shore and the head of the voe. A septic tank discharge from the shore base was the only direct discharge seen to the marine environment. There is a possibility of overboard discharges from boats, particular at the north end of the voe. A few watercourses also discharge to the east side of the voe. These drain steep, inaccessible terrain used for grazing sheep. Contamination observed in mussels appears to be rainfall associated which is consistent with the observed diffuse, land-based sources. Due to its association with freshwater sources, it is anticipated that faecal contaminants may be more concentrated in lower salinity water at or near the surface. Seasonal variation is seen in monitoring results, with lowest results are occurring from April to July. This corresponds with the trend in historical rainfall over the same period. A significant correlation was found between historical monitoring results and rainfall, although this was driven by the number of very low results rather than by high results. Results exceeding 230 E. coli MPN/100 g occurred at low as well as high rainfall values, indicating that rainfall is a poor predictor of high results at this location. Hydrographic analysis showed a consistent near surface flow from the head toward the mouth of the loch, which suggests that contamination carried into the loch via watercourses would move predominantly northward. Given this, it 1 is likely that sources arising in the north of the voe from the shore station and adjacent burn would be taken out of the voe and therefore would be less likely to impact the mussel farm and spat farm to the south. It is recommended that the production area boundaries be extended northward to cover the entire Brindister Voe waterbody and curtailed at the south end to exclude Uni Firth and the Vadills. The RMP should be relocated to a point on the southern end of the Brindister Voe site and bagged shellfish should be placed at that location to ensure consistency in sampling location. Further details on the sampling plan and recommended boundaries can be found in tabular form overleaf and on page 78. 2 II. Sampling Plan and Recommended Production Area Boundaries Production Area Brindister Voe Site Name Brindister Voe SIN SI 023 406 08 Species Common mussel Type of Fishery Long-line aquaculture NGR of RMP HU 2877 5649 East 428770 North 1156490 Tolerance (m) 40 Depth (M) 1 Method of sampling Hand Frequency of Sampling Monthly Local Authority Shetland Islands Sean Williamson Authorised Marion Slater Sampler(s) Daniel Stone Vicki Smith HMMH Sean Williamson Liaison Officer Area bounded by lines drawn between HU 2865 5630 and Production Area HU 2877 5640 and between Boundaries HU 2827 5770 and HU 2858 5782 and extending to MHWS. 3 III. Report 1. General Description Brindister Voe is an inlet on the western coast of Mainland Shetland. It is approximately 1.5 km long and 500 m wide. The voe opens to the Atlantic Ocean in the North and to the south meets The Vadills at Uni Firth. The area around the Voe is very sparsely populated, with road access to the western shore only. A small number of farms and a shore base with pier are located along the road, and cattle grids are identified on the OS map. The sanitary survey at Brindister Voe was undertaken due to the risk ranking the area received amongst areas that had not yet been surveyed. A map showing the location of the area is shown in Figure 1.1. 4 © Crown Copyright and Database 2013. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey licence number [GD100035675] Figure 1.1 Location of survey area 5 2. Fishery The currently classified fishery at Brindister Voe is comprised of a single mussel (Mytilus edulis) farm at site Brindister Voe (SIN SI-023-406-08) in two adjoining legs running parallel to the east shore of the voe. As the site and production area have the same name, the mussel farm itself will be referred to as Brindister Voe site. At the time
Recommended publications
  • SCOTLAND's COASTS and WATERS 2020 Orkney and Shetland
    SCOTLAND’S COASTS AND WATERS 2020 Orkney and Shetland search Seastack at Yesnaby, Orkney search Breckon Sands, Yell, Shetland search Ness of Ork, Shapinsay, Orkney search Braewick, Shetland An island holiday is a very special experience. The distinctive Formed by ancient hills sitting on the submerged continental shelf, coastlines and culture of Scotland's northern isles, Orkney and Shetland boasts over 100 islands, 15 of which are inhabited. Shetland Shetland, make a trip to remember. has an incredibly long coastline of over 2700km, equating to 15% of the entire UK coastline, including some of the highest sea cliffs in The Orkney Islands are an archipelago of around 70 islands (20 of Britain, hundreds of pristine, sandy beaches, sea stacks and caves. which are inhabited) lying a mere 10 miles north of the Scottish mainland. The number of islands, countless cliffs and endless white The unique scenery is due to the diverse geology (all of Shetland is a sandy beaches make for a dramatic shoreline sculpted by the seas UNESCO accredited Geopark), with some rocks over 370 million years over thousands of years. You’re never far from a cliff walk in Orkney. old, the beautiful landscape also including trout lochs, salt marshes, The magnificent red sandstone cliffs on Hoy, the striking natural arch sand dunes, exposed ancient sea floors and the best cross-section of known as the Vat of Kirbister on Stronsay, or the cliff walks at Yesnaby a volcano in Britain. and Marwick Head on West Mainland are just some examples Shetland's wildlife is rich and varied, with 12% of Britain's otters Thanks to its coast, cliffs, wetlands and moorlands, the Orkney around its shores, significant common and grey seal populations, Islands invite waterfowl, waders, raptors and seabirds, including some of the UK's largest seabird colonies (including puffins and the much loved puffin, to make their homes here.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    SCULI'Tl/KED SLAB FRO ISLANE MTH BVKKA,F DO SHETLAND9 19 . ir. NOTIC A SCULPTURE F O E D SLAB FROE ISLANTH M F BURRADO , SHETLAND GILBERY B . T GOUDIE, F.S.A. SCOT. This unique monument, now safely deposited in the Museum of the Society, camo under my eye in the course of investigations which I made in the Burra Isles on the occasion of a visit to Shetland in the month of July 1877. Eichly sculpture wits i t wheel-croshi a s da f eleganso t design, with interlaced ornamentation of Celtic pattern, and a variety of figure subjects carefull ye ranke b executedy dma amont i , e foremosth g n i t interese Sculptureth f o t d Stone f Scotland o t si lay s , A wite . th h decorated side uppermost shora t a ,t distanc e churce soutth th f ho o eht in the ancient churchyard at Papil, it might have been noticed at any time by any one who chose to look for it, or who, chancing to observe it, had recognised its significanc a reli f s Christiao a ce t froar n ma perio f o d remote antiquity. But from age to age it appears to have escaped notice. Th Statisticaw e parisNe e th h l d clergymeAccountan d wroto Ol e snwh e th distric e e yearoth fth n si t 179 184d 9an 1 respectively, see havmo t e been unawar y othes existencit an rf f o o esculpture r o e d t i remains s i r no , noticed by any authors, natives or strangers, who have published accounts of the country from time to time, though the site is of more than ordinary interest ecclesiologically, from the fact of its having been occupied formerly by one of the towered churches of the north, of which that on the island of Egilsa Orknen y i e onlth ys y i preserved specimen s wila , l afterwards shown.e stonb e pass Th ha et memory marke e restindth ge placth f o e members of the family of Mr John Inkster, Baptist missionary in the island case s usua f th sucA eo n .i lh beed relicsha n t i regarde, n a s da importation t soma , e unknown period, from East.e "th " Beyond thio sn traditional idea appear havo st e been preserved regardin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iconography of the Papil Stone: Sculptural and Literary Comparisons with a Pictish Motif*
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot 141 (2011), 159–205 THE ICONOGRAPHY OF THE PAPIL STONE | 159 The iconography of the Papil Stone: sculptural and literary comparisons with a Pictish motif* Kelly A Kilpatrick† ABSTRACT The axe-carrying bird-men and the remaining iconography of the cross-slab from Papil, West Burra, Shetland, are described and analysed. Special emphasis is placed on examining the Papil bird- men first with Irish and Pictish examples of the Temptation of St Antony and second with detailed descriptions of weapon-carrying bird-men and axe-carrying human figures in Pictish sculpture, concluding that the Papil bird-men belong with the latter. This motif is compared with descriptions of battlefield demons in early Irish literature, namely, Morrígan, Bodb and Macha. The Papil cross- slab is suggested to date to the early 9th century, based on technique and comparative iconographic evidence, and is thus contemporary with related Pictish examples. This motif is shown to represent a common ideal of mythological war-like creatures in Pictish tradition, paralleled by written descriptions of Irish battlefield demons, thus suggesting shared perceptions of similar mythological figures in the Insular world. A further connection between Ireland, Irish ecclesiastical foundations in the Hebrides, Shetland and southern Pictland is also discussed. INTRODUCTION Pictish monumental art. In many instances this has conditioned the suggested interpretations The cross-slab known as the Papil Stone of the monument’s iconography. In previous (illus 1 & 2) was discovered in 1887 by studies, various icons from this cross-slab Gilbert Goudie (1881) in the churchyard of have been compared individually with similar St Laurence’s Church, Papil, West Burra, examples in Britain and Ireland, especially Shetland (NGR HU 3698 3141).
    [Show full text]
  • Central Mainland the Heart of Shetland Research Facilities for Scientific and Technological Projects Relating to the Fishing and Aquaculture Industries
    Central Scalloway’s Westshore Public art on New Street Mainland Out at Port Arthur the marina and Scalloway Boating Club offer a safe haven and a warm welcome for visiting boats and their crews. Next to the boating club is the NAFC Marine Centre, the Centre offers training in nautical studies and Central Mainland The heart of Shetland research facilities for scientific and technological projects relating to the fishing and aquaculture industries. It also houses an excellent fish restaurant. Traditional boats drawn up on shore recall Shetland’s Some Useful Information fishing past. In Norse times Scalloway (‘the bay of the Accommodation: VisitShetland hall’) may have been the home of an important landowner Tel: 08701 999440 or official. Airport (inter-island): Tingwall Tel: (01595) 840246 Scalloway’s other attractions include a heated 17-metre Neighbourhood Scalloway Post Office indoor swimming pool, the youth centre, a hotel, guest Information Point Shetland Jewellry, Weisdale houses, cafes, pubs, shops and playing fields. Shops: Hamnavoe; Scalloway; Throughout the village are a number of works of public Whiteness; Weisdale art including sculptures done in Hildasay granite and Petrol: Burra; Weisdale flower tubs recycled from tractor wheels and tyres. Public toilets: Hamnavoe; Meal Beach; Scalloway Pubs and places to eat: Scalloway; Tingwall; Whiteness; Weisdale Post Offices: Hamnavoe; Weisdale; Scalloway Public telephones: Scalloway; Burra; Tingwall; Whiteness; Weisdale Museums and The NAFC Marine Centre overlooks the entrance to Scalloway Harbour Heritage Centres Scalloway, Burra Swimming pool: Scalloway Tel: (01595) 880745 Churches: Burra; Scalloway; Whiteness; Weisdale; Girlsta; Tingwall Doctor and Health Centre: Scalloway Tel: (01595) 880219 Police Station: Scalloway Tel: (01595) 880222 Contents copyright protected – please contact Shetland Amenity Trust for details.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Landscape Areas- Draft
    Shetland Local Development Plan Consultation Draft 2014 Supplementary Guidance Landscape Areas Local DRAFT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Supplementary Guidance - Local Landscape Areas- Draft The Shetland Local Development Plan (the Plan), together with any Supplementary Guidance, sets out the policies and criteria against which planning applications submitted in Shetland will be considered. This Supplementary Guidance sets out detailed policy advice to help you meet the requirements of the Plan. It is therefore recommended that it is read in conjunction with the policies in the Plan and any other Supplementary Guidance relevant to the type of development proposed. The purpose of this Supplementary Guidance (SG) is to provide additional information and maps of the proposed Local Landscape Areas. Introduction The purpose of the Local Landscape Areas is to ensure sympathetic siting and design of new development within the Local Landscape Areas, (LLA). It is not the intention of the Council to prevent development, but to encourage appropriate consideration of the landscape. The introduction of Local Landscape Areas will help to protect and enhance some of Shetlands unique environment and may provide direction for access and tourism. The information used to devise the Local Landscape Areas SG has been produced from the research conducted by Land Use Consultants. The full report including the research methodology can be seen in Shetland Islands Local Landscape Designation Review. The proposed Local Landscape Areas are; 1. Ronas Hill 2. Nibon and Mangaster 3. Vementry and West Burrafirth 4. Papa Stour and Sandness 5. Walls and Vaila 6. Culswick and Westerwick 7. Weisdale 8. Scat Ness and Sumburgh Head 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taing, Bridge End, Burra, Shetland, ZE2
    The Taing, Bridge End, Burra, Shetland, ZE2 9LE This two bedroom bungalow is situated in a Offers over £47,000 are invited secluded and picturesque voe of West Burra just a stones through to the shoreline and with stunning Kitchen, Sitting Room, Bathroom and two Double Accommodation sea views. Bedrooms. Refurbishment and repair is required to the dwellinghouse. Planning Permission (ref Extensive grassed garden grounds with Planning 2019/064/PPP) has been obtained to include an External Permission in principle for the erection of a large extension to the rear of the property encompassing Boat Shed. the existing stone built outbuildings. Burra is linked to the mainland by two bridges Highly recommended. Please contact the Seller Viewings affording a rural lifestyle with the amenities of on 01595 696969 to arrange a viewing. Scalloway and Lerwick no more than 20 minutes away. Early entry is available once conveyancing Entry This property presents an ideal opportunity for formalities permit. those looking for a project and county living. EPC Rating Not applicable. Further particulars and Home Report from and all offers to:- Anderson & Goodlad, Solicitors 52 Commercial Street, Lerwick, Shetland, ZE1 0BD T: 01595 692297 F: 01595 692247 E: [email protected] W: www.anderson-goodlad.co.uk Accommodation This property requires extensive renovation and has Planning Permission in principle (“PPP”) (ref. 2019/064/PPP). In its current condition the dwellinghouse has hot and cold water, working toilet, electricity supply, heating and
    [Show full text]
  • An Old Find from Shetland Re-Interpreted | 119 Doi
    Proc Soc AntiqANOTHER Scot 147 PICTISH (2017), 119–126 CROSS-OF-ARCS: AN OLD FIND FROM SHETLAND RE-INTERPRETED | 119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9750/PSAS.147.1238 Another Pictish cross-of-arcs: an old find from Shetland re-interpreted Anna Ritchie1 ABSTRACT A fragment of carved stone known as ‘Lerwick’ (NMS X.IB.19) is argued to have come, most probably, from the Pictish levels at Jarlshof, Dunrossness, Shetland, sometime before June 1861. The stone bears part of a Pictish crescent symbol on one side and part of a cross-of-arcs embellished with decorated lentoid forms on the other. The symbol-bearing cross-slab from which the fragment comes probably dates to the 7th century and may have stood in or near a churchyard at Jarlshof. It is compared with the cross-slabs from Papil and Bressay and with fragments of similar Shetland stones, and its place in the development of the cross-of-arcs is discussed. In the collections of National Museums Scotland extant. At the time of the sale in 1882, Alexander is a small fragment of a Pictish carved stone for Cunningham Hay wrote to John Alexander Smith which the given provenance is simply ‘Lerwick at the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland: ‘We Museum’. This was a museum in the Tolbooth have tried all means to recover the Catalogue in Lerwick and it belonged to the Shetland of the Museum but without success’ (National Literary and Scientific Society, founded in Museums Scotland Research Centre, NMS SAS 1861 to ‘promote the formation of a Museum UC 85/9, 30 October 1882).
    [Show full text]
  • Shetland's Wildlife
    Shetland’s Wildlife Naturetrek Tour Report 24 June - 2 July 2013 Arctic Skua 2013 Naturetrek Group on St.Ninian's Isle with tombolo behind Northern Fulmars Noup of Noss Report & images compiled by David McAllister Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Shetland’s Wildlife Tour Leader: David McAllister - Naturalist Participants Angela Melamed Robert Pluck Megan Howells Helen Young Nicky Brooks Andy Wainwright Julia Spragg Day 1 Monday 24th June Weather: Calm, clear Between 3 and 5 pm we met David in the Northlink Ferry terminal. On boarding MV Hrossey we settled into our cabins and seats then ate our evening meal so that we could be on deck when the ship sailed. We did some bird-watching as the ship manoeuvred through Aberdeen harbour, and had excellent views of a Grey Seal with fish. Unfortunately the local group of Bottle-nosed Dolphins were not off the pier this year but we did have a brief view of one further out. Day 2 Tuesday 25th June Weather: Bright, sunny in PM The ship passed Fair Isle at about 5am and David and a few of the group were on deck from 5:30 am watching the Fulmars, auks, Gannets and Bonxies (Great Skuas) following the ship. We passed Sumburgh Head and as we came into the Bressay Sound leading to Lerwick met our first Tysties (Black Guillemots), a common sight in Shetland’s harbours. On disembarking we collected the waiting minibus and headed straight for the Sumburgh Hotel where we met Megan, the last member of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics for Inhabited Islands
    General Register Office for S C O T L A N D information about Scotland’s people Occasional Paper No. 10 Published on 28 November 2003 Scotland’s Census 2001 Statistics for Inhabited Islands This paper present data from the 2001 Census of Population, as well as from earlier Censuses, on the inhabited islands of Scotland. It makes comparisons between individual islands groups and also compares the islands as a whole with Scotland. Contact point: Customer Services Population Statistics Branch General Register Office for Scotland Ladywell House Ladywell Road Edinburgh EH12 7TF Tel: 0131 314 4299 Fax: 0131 314 4696 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.gro-scotland.gov.uk General Register Office for Scotland, © Crown copyright 2003 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 Commentary............................................................................................................... 3 Demography ........................................................................................................... 3 Households and families......................................................................................... 5 Housing .................................................................................................................. 6 Cultural attributes.................................................................................................... 6 Illness and health...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 In-Migrants 8 to Island Groups and Out-Migrants 8 from Island Groups
    Table 7 In-migrants 8 to island groups and out-migrants 8 from island groups Breakdown by island group destination area (for in-migrants) and origin area (for out-migrants) In-migrants to islands Out-migrants from islands Net migration to/(from) Island group groups groups islands Inhabited island groups 4,293 4,846 (553) Argyll & Bute Bute 370 268 102 Coll 8 8 0 Colonsay 12 4 8 Easdale 6 10 (4) Gigha 8 12 (4) Iona 26 20 6 Islay 115 153 (38) Jura 6 6 0 Lismore 1 16 (15) Luing 19 14 5 Mull 177 196 (19) Seil 48 60 (12) Tiree 37 34 3 Eilean Siar Barra 47 52 (5) Benbecula 93 115 (22) Berneray (North Uist) 12 8 4 Eriskay 8 0 8 Great Bernera 18 10 8 Grimsay (North) 23 16 7 Lewis and Harris 573 728 (155) North Uist 49 58 (9) Scalpay (Harris) 6 2 4 South Uist 52 118 (66) Vatersay 12 7 5 Highland Eigg 12 30 (18) Raasay 20 15 5 Skye 486 518 (32) North Ayrshire Arran 344 251 93 Great Cumbrae 91 102 (11) Orkney Islands Burray 12 20 (8) Eday 11 16 (5) Flotta 4 28 (24) Hoy 11 35 (24) Mainland of Orkney 564 584 (20) North Ronaldsay 3 2 1 Papa Westray 6 4 2 Rousay 28 26 2 Sanday (Orkney) 30 39 (9) Shapinsay 12 26 (14) South Ronaldsay 38 88 (50) Stronsay 23 24 (1) Westray 24 33 (9) General Register Office for Scotland, © Crown copyright 2003 Table 7 In-migrants 8 to island groups and out-migrants 8 from island groups Breakdown by island group destination area (for in-migrants) and origin area (for out-migrants) In-migrants to islands Out-migrants from islands Net migration to/(from) Island group groups groups islands Shetland Islands Bressay 21 22 (1) East Burra 8 2 6 Fair Isle 5 4 1 Fetlar 5 4 1 Housay 4 2 2 Mainland of Shetland 596 722 (126) Muckle Roe 1 5 (4) Trondra 13 5 8 Unst 87 183 (96) West Burra 30 49 (19) Whalsay 31 50 (19) Yell 47 42 5 Footnote 8 In-migrants are persons who, in the year prior to Census date, moved to an address in an island group from an address outwith that island group.
    [Show full text]
  • Vementry North and South
    S cottish Sanitary Survey Report S anitary Survey Report V ementry North and South SI -322 & SI-321 Fe bruary 2014 , Food Standards Agency food.gov.uk Buidheann lnbne-Bldhe Vementry North and South Report Title Sanitary Survey Report Project Name Scottish Sanitary Survey Food Standards Agency Client/Customer Scotland Cefas Project Reference C5792E Document Number C5792C_2013_14 Revision V1.0 Date 13/02/2014 Revision History Revision Date Pages revised Reason for revision number Draft for external 0.1 8/11/2013 All consultation 4,9,13,79,80 and Appendix 5, Correction of typographical 1.0 12/02/2014 31-35 errors Name Position Date Michelle Price-Hayward, Scottish sanitary survey Author Jessica Larkham, Liefy 13/02/2014 team Hendrikz, Frank Cox Principal shellfish hygiene Checked Ron Lee 13/02/2014 scientist Principal shellfish hygiene Approved Ron Lee 13/02/2014 scientist This report was produced by Cefas for its Customer, FSAS, for the specific purpose of providing a sanitary survey as per the Customer’s requirements. Although every effort has been made to ensure the information contained herein is as complete as possible, there may be additional information that was either not available or not discovered during the survey. Cefas accepts no liability for any costs, liabilities or losses arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon the contents of this report by any person other than its Customer. Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Weymouth Laboratory, Barrack Road, The Nothe, Weymouth DT4 8UB. Tel 01305 206 600 www.cefas.defra.gov.uk Vementry North & South Sanitary Survey Report V1.0 13/02/2014 i Report Distribution – Vementry North and South Date Name Agency Joyce Carr Scottish Government David Denoon SEPA Hazel MacLeod SEPA Fiona Garner Scottish Water Alex Adrian Crown Estate Dawn Manson Shetland Islands Council Sean Williamson HMMH, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees in Shetland? – a Palynological Exploration
    TREES IN SHETLAND? A PALYNOLOGICAL EXPLORATION Graeme Whittington Introduction In 1774, the Reverend George Low undertook a perambulation through the 'Islands of Orkney and Schetland'. He kept a journal of his tour but it had to wait a century before being published. He approached Mainland from the south and made the following observation: -...... ... a clear view of the whole south part of the country, which indeed affords no very prepossessing appearance, the whole vista of ranges of dreary wilds, black and dismal mountains, whose tops are covered with almost perpetual fogs, their sides swampy bogs, without either good heath or shrub; the rocks in most places being the only support the eye has under the general dusk, which sticking thro' the sides of the hills is a sort of variety in this wretched prospect (Low 1879: 65). He certainly pre-dated the romantic view of mountains purveyed by Walter Scott. He was not as caustic, however, about the appearance of trees as Johnson, who commented : A tree might be a show in Scotland, as a horse in Venice. At St Andrews Mr Boswell found only one, and recommended it to my notice; I told him, that it was rough and low, or looked, as I thought, so. This said he 'is nothing to another a few miles off' (Johnson 1775: 6). Low left arboreal comment with: Busta, a large house with a good garden, planted with different sorts of wood but all stunted as soon as it comes above the garden wall. I observed Common Elder, Rowan and Plane Trees, grow highest, but even these could not stand the climate (Low 1879: 129).
    [Show full text]