DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Act No. 11-48; House Bill No. 6651

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Act No. 11-48; House Bill No. 6651 House Bill No. 6651 Public Act No. 11-48 AN ACT IMPLEMENTING PROVISIONS OF THE BUDGET CONCERNING GENERAL GOVERNMENT. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: Section 1. Subsection (a) of section 17b-278g of the general statutes, as amended by section 94 of public act 11-44, is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2011): (a) To the extent permitted by federal law, no payment shall be provided by the Department of Social Services under the Medicaid program for more than one pair of eyeglasses every two years, except payment may be provided under the Medicaid program for an additional pair of eyeglasses during the two-year period when a Medicaid recipient's health care provider determines that such eyeglasses are necessary because of a change in the recipient's medical condition. Said department shall administer the payment for eyeglasses and contact lenses as cost effectively as possible. Sec. 2. Section 69 of public act 11-44 is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective from passage): Notwithstanding the provisions of section 60 of public act 05-251, effective January 1, 2012, the personnel, payroll, [administrative] affirmative action and business office functions of the Board of Education and Services for the Blind and the Commission on the Deaf and Hearing Impaired shall no longer be merged and consolidated into the Department of Administrative Services and will be assumed by the Bureau of Rehabilitative Services, provided the director of the Bureau of Rehabilitative Services may extend the effective date for the transfer of functions for six months, to June 30, 2012, by submitting a written notice to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to human services and appropriations and the budgets of state agencies. Sec. 3. Section 11 of public act 11-6 is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2011): (a) The Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management shall monitor expenditures for Personal Services, during the fiscal years ending June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2013, in order to reduce such expenditures by $ 12,014,800 for such purpose during each such fiscal year. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to the constituent units of the state system of higher education, as defined in section 10a-1 of the general statutes. (b) The Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management shall monitor expenditures for Other Expenses, during the fiscal years ending June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2013, in order to reduce such expenditures for such purpose by $ 9,440,200 during each such fiscal year. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to the constituent units of the state system of higher education, as defined in section 10a-1 of the general statutes. Sec. 4. Subsection (a) of section 12 of public act 11-6 is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2011): (a) Any agreement reached through negotiations between the state and the State Employees Bargaining [Unit] Agent Coalition (SEBAC) concerning wages, hours and other conditions of employment to achieve the labor- management savings specified in [this act] public act 11-6 shall be subject to approval of the General Assembly in accordance with section 5-278 of the general statutes. Sec. 5. Subsection (b) of section 48 of public act 11-6 is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2011): (b) The sum of $ 100,000 appropriated in section 1 of [this act] public act 11- 6 to the [Office of Policy and Management] Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, for Operation Fuel, for each of the fiscal years ending June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2013, shall be available for the purpose of providing a grant to Operation Fuel, Incorporated, for operating expenses incurred for administration of the emergency [home cooling] energy assistance provided pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. Sec. 6. (Effective July 1, 2011) Up to $ 100,000 of the unexpended balance of funds appropriated to the Banking Department in section 6 of public act 09-3 of the June special session, and carried forward by section 55 of public act 10- 179, for Other Expenses, shall not lapse on June 30, 2011, and such funds shall continue to be available for the purpose of upgrading software during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012. Sec. 7. (Effective July 1, 2011) Up to $ 15,000 of the unexpended balance of funds appropriated to the Banking Department in section 16 of public act 09-3 of the June special session, for Equipment, shall not lapse on June 30, 2011, and such funds shall continue to be available for the purpose of upgrading software during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012. Sec. 8. (Effective July 1, 2011) Up to $ 300,000 of the unexpended balance of funds appropriated to the Department of Motor Vehicles in section 12 of public act 09-3 of the June special session, as amended by section 2 of public act 10-179, for Equipment, shall not lapse on June 30, 2011, and such funds shall be transferred to Other Expenses, for the purpose of replacing the roof of the Department of Motor Vehicles' Enfield office during the fiscal years ending June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2013. Sec. 9. (Effective July 1, 2011) Up to $ 100,000 of the unexpended balance of funds appropriated to the Department of Motor Vehicles in section 12 of public act 09-3 of the June special session, as amended by section 2 of public act 10-179, for Other Expenses, shall not lapse on June 30, 2011, and such funds shall continue to be available for the purpose of replacing the roof of the Department of Motor Vehicles' Enfield office during the fiscal years ending June 30, 2012, and June 30, 2013. Sec. 10. Subsection (b) of section 36a-65 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2011): (b) (1) Each such bank and credit union shall pay the commissioner the amount allocated to it [within twenty business days from the time the commissioner mails a notice to it of the amount due, with] not later than the date specified by the commissioner for payment. Any such bank or credit union shall pay the commissioner an additional two hundred dollars if [the amount allocated] such payment is not paid [in] by the time specified. The provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to any person required to pay the commissioner any fee for license or registration or the whole cost of all examinations made by the commissioner. (2) [The] Except as provided in section 134 of public act 11-6, as amended by this act, the State Treasurer shall place all funds received from the commissioner[and all moneys received from any person for documents or reports sold by the commissioner] in a special fund to be known as the State Banking Fund. Amounts in the fund may be expended only pursuant to appropriation by the General Assembly. (3) The Comptroller shall determine for each fiscal year the expenses of the Department of Banking. (4) The Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management shall examine the State Banking Fund annually after the Comptroller has made his determination and shall direct the Treasurer to set aside within the Banking Fund amounts in excess of a reasonable reserve for contingencies, which excess amounts shall be considered a surplus for the purposes of subsection (a) of this section. Sec. 11. Section 134 of public act 11-6 is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2011): Any fines, civil penalties or restitution imposed by the Banking Commissioner or ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with section 36a-50, 36a-53, 36b-27 or [36a-57] 36b-72 of the general statutes and any late fees received by the commissioner pursuant to subsection (b) of section 36a-65 of the general statutes, as amended by this act, shall be deposited into the General Fund. Sec. 12. Subsection (c) of section 32-601 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2011): (c) (1) The board of directors shall annually elect one of its members as vice- chairperson and shall elect other of its members as officers, adopt a budget and bylaws, designate an executive committee, report semiannually to the appointing authorities with respect to operations, finances and achievement of its economic development objectives, be accountable to and cooperate with the state whenever, pursuant to the provisions of sections 32-600 to 32-611, inclusive, as amended by this act, the state may audit the authority or any project of the authority, as defined in section 32-600, or at any other time as the state may inquire as to either, including allowing the state reasonable access to any such project and to the records of the authority and exercise the powers set forth in section 32-602, as amended by this act. (2) The authority shall have an executive director [, who shall be a member of the staff of the Office of Policy and Management and shall act as project comptroller pursuant to subparagraph (A) of subdivision (1) of section 32- 655a. The executive director] who shall be appointed by the board of directors and shall be the chief administrative officer of the authority.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Telling Guilford's Story: Report on Interpretation and Signage
    December 31, 2013 Telling Guilford’s Story Report on Interpretation and Signage Prepared for the Heritage Tourism Initiative of the Guilford Preservation Alliance Nancy I. M. Morgan, Ph.D. Point Heritage Development Consulting Jeffrey Dawson Dawson Associates Carolyn Brackett National Trust for Historic Preservation This project was made possible through generous support from the Connecticut Humanities Council and the Guilford Foundation. Contents Project Background 1 Introduction 1 Telling Guilford’s Story: Project Scope 2 Summary of Meetings 2 Elisabeth C. Adams Middle School Meeting 2 Information Kiosk Meeting 3 Historical Experts Meeting 3 Guilford Community Meeting 5 Heritage Tourism Initiative Meeting 6 Telling Guilford’s Story 8 A Thematic Framework 9 Theme 1 9 Theme 2 11 Theme 3 13 Theme 4 16 A Selected Bibliography for Telling Guilford’s Stories 19 Identifying Target Audiences for Guilford’s Heritage Tourism Experience 21 Section Overview: Identifying Target Audiences 21 Current Traveler Profile 22 Potential Target Audiences for Guilford 27 Signing Guilford 29 Site Visit 29 Survey of Existing Conditions 31 Summary of Challenges and Opportunities 41 Examples from Other Communities 43 Maps 45 Telling Guilford’s Story A Report on Interpretation and Signage Project Background Introduction Guilford is a vibrant historic community that fronts the Long Island Sound and stretches into the rolling Connecticut farmland of New Haven County. The town is blessed with a history that stretches nearly four centuries into the past, the Guilford Green and architecture that define an incredible sense of place, and forward-looking citizens who appreciate the town’s legacy and are thoughtfully building upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation and the New Deal
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations Summer 2019 Restoring America: Historic Preservation and the New Deal Stephanie E. Gray Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Gray, S. E.(2019). Restoring America: Historic Preservation and the New Deal. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5433 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESTORING AMERICA: HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND THE NEW DEAL by Stephanie E. Gray Bachelor of Arts Mount Holyoke College, 2013 Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2016 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2019 Accepted by: Lauren Rebecca Sklaroff, Major Professor Robert Weyeneth, Committee Member Patricia Sullivan, Committee Member Lydia Mattice Brandt, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Stephanie E. Gray, 2019 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION For my mother, Lucy Gray. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is said that writing a dissertation is a solitary venture. While that is true to some extent, no dissertation is completed without the support of many people in many places. First, I extend my deepest gratitude to my wonderful committee. To my advisor, Lauren Sklaroff, tremendous thanks for accepting me as a student and teaching me to think and write like a cultural historian.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Procedure and Regulations
    TOWN OF GUILFORD HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION 50 Boston Street Guilford, Connecticut 06437 Telephone: (203) 453-8039 Rules of Procedure and Regulations Contents Page Historical Overview ................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 Map of Districts ....................................................................................................................... 6 Rules of Procedure and Regulations ........................................................................................ 7 Section I. General .................................................................................................................... 7 Section II. Organization of the Commission ........................................................................... 7 Section III. Administrative Procedures .................................................................................... 9 Section IV. Meetings and Public Hearings ............................................................................ 12 Section V. Regulated Activities ............................................................................................. 14 Section VI. Non-Regulated Activities ................................................................................... 17 Section VII. Certificates of Appropriateness ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SHARED STEWARDSHIP: 2018-2023 Statewide Historic Preservation Plan
    SHARED STEWARDSHIP: 2018-2023 Statewide Historic Preservation Plan State Historic Preservation Office Department of Economic & Community Development 450 Columbus Blvd, Suite 5 Hartford, CT 06103 Dear Connecticut, The staff of the State Historic Preservation Office is honored to work on your behalf to preserve the places that add meaning to our state. These places—where we live and work and play, and where the past is tethered to the future—express our humanity. With great enthusiasm, we present this plan to build on the work we do and ensure that our agency best serves the people of Connecticut. Thank you, Staff of the Connecticut State Historic Preservation Office & Museum Division 2 SHARED STEWARDSHIP: 2018-2023 Statewide Historic Preservation Plan State Historic Preservation Office Michael McBride Museum Curator, Henry Whitfield State Museum Julie Carmelich Historian, Tax Credit, Preservation Easement and Michelle Parrish Social Media Coordinator Museum Curator, Henry Whitfield State Museum Mary Dunne Barbara Russ Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Museum Assistant, Sloane Stanley Museum Architectural Historian, Certified Local Government and Grants Coordinator Historic Preservation Council Deborah Gaston Sara O. Nelson, Chair Secretary Karyn M. Gilvarg, Vice-Chair Margaret M. Faber Catherine Labadia Leah Glaser Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Katherine D. Kane Staff Archaeologist and Environmental Review Kathleen Maher Jeffrey F.L. Partridge Todd Levine Fiona Vernal Architectural Historian, Environmental Review, and Walter W. Woodward, State Historian Freedom Trail Coordinator Brian Jones, State Archaeologist Jane Schneider State Historic Preservation Review Administrative Assistant Board Alyssa Lozupone Jared I. Edwards, Chair Architectural Preservationist, Homeowner Tax Credit W. Phillips Barlow and Construction Grants Coordinator Cecelia Bucki Kenneth L.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodruff-Farm-Advisory-Committee
    INDEX I. Committee II. Charge III. Site History IV. Process V. Relation of the Woodruff Property to the Town of Guilford VI. Current Status VII. Recommendations VIII. Final Thoughts 2 WOODRUFF FARM ADVISORY COMMITTEE I. Committee The Guilford Board of Selectmen formed the Woodruff Farm Advisory Committee on February 24, 2004, to make recommendations regarding future uses of the property. Committee members were selected for their specific relationship to the area surrounding the Woodruff Farm. Committee members were as follows: Harvey Smith–Committee Chairman, Member of the Board of Selectmen Russell Campaigne–Chairman of the Historical District Nancy Elderbaum–Representing Woodruff Farm neighbors north of the railroad tracks Lawrence Leete–Representing Shoreline East commuters and neighboring Guilford Agricultural Society Steven McGuire–Representing Woodruff Farm neighbors south of the railroad tracks II. Charge Recommendations were to consider “potential uses for the entire property, and shall consider the viability of retaining the current structures remaining on the property for future potential uses by the Town or other appropriate organizations.” “The Committee shall be cognizant of the following factors in making its recommendations: 3 1. The Town is obligated to provide land to the State of Connecticut Department of Transportation (“DOT”) for 400 parking spaces at or in the vicinity of the existing train station as a condition of the DOT’s construction of a new train station in Guilford, which parking must be reasonably convenient to rail station users; 2. Prior to the purchase of the property, the Board of Selectmen voted in favor of this purchase in part so the Town could satisfy the parking obligation of the DOT with respect to the new train station; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Zi&T of Old Colonial ®Siises Still Standing in the State of Connecticut
    Zi&t of Old Colonial ®Siises Still Standing in the State of Connecticut 1903 Compiled by the Connecticut Society of . the Colonial Dames of America. List of Old Colonial Houses Still Standing in the State of Connecticut Compiled by the Connecticut Society of the Colonial Dames of America rHE Society greatly desires to receive the names of any houses not already on the list which can be contributed by any one competent to answer for their antiquity. It is further desired, wherever possible, not only to secure the names, but also the histories of all houses still standing in Connecticut, built before the Revolu- tion. Any information bearing upon the history of any such houses, or any additions to the histories of houses already received, would be gratefully welcomed by the Society. The Committee on Old Houses will furnish blanks to any one wishing them, which provide a con- venient form for recording all such information. These blanks, when collected, will be bound and deposited in the keeping of the Connecticut Historical Society. Address any member of the Committee. MRS. HENRY FERGUSON, 123 Vernon St., Hartford, Conn. Miss M. K. TALCOTT, 133 Sigourney St., Hartford, Conn. Miss MARY BEACH, Vine Hill, West Hartford, Conn. COMMITTEE ON OLD HOUSES. ERRATA. GUILFORD. All information in regard to the Henry Whitfield House was obtained from " Henry Whitfield House " by Rev. William G. Andrews. NEW HAVEN. See "Colonial Houses in New Haven" by Miss Susan C. Gower, from which all the names and dates of New Haven houses mentioned in this list were taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Acts
    C 76 /S »«i ^ SPECIAL ACTS PASSED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT AT THE JANUARY SESSION, 1969 and JUNE SPECIAL SESSION, 1969 PREPARED PURSUANT TO SECTION 3-83 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES by Secretary of the State HARTFORD 1969 Published by the state under the authority of Sec. 4-119 of the General Statutes. Louis I. GLADSTONE Comptroller SPECIAL ACTS OF THE £s>tate of Connecticut WITH APPENDICES CONTAINING Appropriations and grants from the treasury and executive appointments VOLUME XXXIV 1969 HARTFORD PUBLISHED BY THE STATE 1969 SPECIAL ACTS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT JANUARY SESSION, 1969 At a General Assembly of the State of Connecticut, held at Hartford, in said State, on the Wednesday after the first Monday of January, being the eighth day of said month, and continuing until the final adjournment thereof, on Wednesday the fourth day of June next following, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and sixty- nine. [Senate Bill No. 135.] [1.] AN ACT EXTENDING THE TIME LIMIT FOR THE RE­ PORT OF THE COMMISSION TO STUDY TFIE FEAS­ IBILITY OF A BRIDGE FROM THE BRIDGEPORT AREA TO LONG ISLAND. Section 3 of number 332 of the special acts of 1967 is amended to read as follows: Said commission shall report its findings and recommendations to the governor and the general assembly on or before March 1, 1969. Approved January 14, 1969. 6 SPECIAL ACTS [Tan., Sr. No. 2 [Senate Bill No. 246.] [2.] AN ACT EXTENDING THE TIME WITHIN WHICH STUDY COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES MAY RE­ PORT TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND THE GOVERNOR.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Stewardship: Preserving Your Historic Property in an Era of Climate Change
    June 2019 Resilient Stewardship: Preserving Your Historic Property In an Era of Climate Change R CHRISTOPHER GOODVVIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Resilient Stewardship: Preserving your historic property in an era of climate change Kathryn M. Kuranda, R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Samuel H. Young, R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. COVER: DETAILS OF SELECT HISTORIC CONNECTICUT PROPERTIES, 2016. CREDIT: RCG&A. Contents I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................1 II. ABOUT THIS GUIDE ...............................................................3 III. HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN CONNECTICUT ............................................5 IV. BEST PRACTICES FOR PRESERVATION ...............................................9 V. THE CLIMATE CHALLENGE .........................................................12 Historic Buildings and Environmental Stress ..................................................13 Water is the Enemy ......................................................................15 VI. MEETING THE CHALLENGE: BUILDING MAINTENANCE ................................20 Assemble Data ..........................................................................21 Develop and Execute Corrective Action .....................................................22 Ensure That Maintenance Work Has Corrected the Problem ....................................23 Develop a Five-Year Plan ..................................................................23 VII. MEETING THE CHALLENGE: MITIGATION ............................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Whitfield Street, Boston Street
    Whitfield Street Whitfield Street, one of the town’s original streets, was first known as South Lane. At one time it was also called Hog Lane for reasons we can only guess at today. Perhaps hogs were driven down the lane to be loaded on boats and taken to market. Later, because it led to the sluice and the docks, it was named Harbor Street. In 1885, in anticipation of Guilford’s 250th anniversary celebration, a committee renamed the street for Henry Whitfield, leader of the original settlers, and urged that other streets be given historically important names—Desborough, Chittenden, Leete—-but nothing more came of the idea. The walk, about four-tenths of a mile long, begins at the corner of Whitfield and Water streets and goes south to within sight of the bridge over the railroad where it veers left onto Old Whitfield Street. There are several buildings worth seeing on the other side of the bridge—the Lot Benton-Henry Ward Beecher house and the old railroad station and its outbuildings, for instance—but they exceed the geographical limits of the guide and are best reached by car. Nathaniel Eliot, 103 Whitfield Street, Colonial, 1755. Here is an example of a five-bay, center- chimney, one-room-deep Colonial house with integral lean-to. The Greek Revival doorway, shed dormer in the rear, and a one-and-a-half-story Greek Revival wing are all later additions; vinyl siding obscures the trim. Nathaniel and his wife, Beulah Parmelee, had two children, William and Mary. Mary married a Tory Episcopalian tailor named Israel Halleck and became the mother of Fitz-Greene Halleck, a well-known nineteenth-century poet, and his sister Maria.
    [Show full text]
  • Join the Connecticut Trust! ■ Chairman’S Circle $ 1,000 ■ Preservation Patron $ 500 Name ■ Mr
    Connecticut Preservation News May/June 2019 Volume XLII, No. 3 Connecticut Preservation Awards Harlan H. Griswold Award: Guilford Preservation Alliance, Inc. istoric and natural resources in the town of Guilford have an and lack of awareness could and would erode the character of a H effective and tireless champion in the Guilford Preservation unique town that dates back to 1639 and comprised farmland, Alliance (GPA). The GPA was formed in 1980 by a group that village center, and coastal habitat. Today, the volunteer board included architectural historian Betty Brown and former First still carries out this mission in partnership with fellow citizens, Selectwoman Marjorie Schmidt, along with other passionate and related organizations, and local and state officials. committed residents. They recognized that development pressures continued on page 4 J. Fiereck Photography ___________________________________ In This Issue: ___________________________________ Mimi Findlay Award: Cameron Henry 2 ___________________________________ Public History Conference 8 Awards of Merrit 10 Left to right: Jane Montanaro, Connecticut Trust; Dennis Culliton, ___________________________________ Guilford Preservation Alliance; Matthew Hoey, Guilford First ___________________________________ News from Around the State 14 Selectman; Shirley Girioni, Guilford Preservation Alliance; Elizabeth Shapiro, State Historic Preservation Office ___________________________________ Janet Jainschigg Award: Carol Leahy 20 The Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation is a private, nonprofit organization. ISSN 1084-189X Connecticut Preservation Awards J. Fiereck Photography Mimi Findlay Award: Cameron Henry, 2019 recipient of the Mimi Findlay Award, with Cameron Henry Mimi Findlay ameron Henry grew up listening to the will help ensure that the mill C many stories of his family’s centuries- is recognized, stabilized, and old, antique-cluttered home in Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    The Town of GConnecticut,uilford USA Founded 1639 “Discover a piece of Connecticut History” Plan of Conservation and Development Goals This PoCD is organized around eight overarching goals Preserve Guilford’s character, culture, and scenic values. Conserve Guilford’s lands, waters, and natural areas. Make compatible commerce and livelihood thrive. Encourage development of a diverse housing supply for households with a broad range of incomes, family size, and ages. Provide community facilities for education, recreation, and emergency services. Provide safe, efficient, and compatible transportation infrastructure. Provide appropriate and compatible utilities and infrastructure to support Guilford’s population. Encourage participation in cooperative efforts to promote the health and welfare of the South Central Connecticut region. boasts significant historic structures, Guilford and takes pride in amenities such as the Town Green and the Town Harbor. Open water, coves and bays, wetlands, forests, fields, tree-lined streets, stone walls, and winding roads highlight the abundant natural beauty of the Town. Guilford blends the seashore, the historic Town Center, and the countryside into a character that is richly evocative of a classic coastal New England small town. This Plan of Conservation and Development (PoCD) is a tool to create common goals for the town in its long-term growth. It is intended to be both visionary and action oriented. The process of updating the plan has given the town the opportunity to focus on “the big picture,” affirm goals identified in the last plan adopted in 2002, and identify new trends to prepare for future opportunities and challenges. It has provided several forums for the discussion of shared values and concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey, 2/28/19
    BRUCE L. MCDERMOTT 203.772.7787 DIRECT TELEPHONE 860.240.5723 DIRECT FACSIMILE [email protected] February 28, 2019 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND UPS NEXT DAY DELIVERY Mr. James J. Murphy, Vice-Chairman Connecticut Siting Council Ten Franklin Square New Britain, CT 06051 Re: Petition No. 1354 – Chatfield Solar Fund, LLC, petition for a declaratory ruling, pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes §4-176 and §16-50k, for the proposed construction, maintenance and operation of a 1.98-megawatt AC solar photovoltaic electric generating facility located in Killingworth, Connecticut Dear Vice-Chairman Murphy: Enclosed please find the original and fifteen (15) copies of the Phase I Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey requested by the Connecticut State Historic Preservation Office that was discussed at the February 21st hearing. The survey recommends no further archaeological conservation efforts with respect to potential prehistoric or historic archaeological resources on the project property. Please feel free to contact me with any questions concerning this submittal at (203) 772-7787. Very truly yours, Bruce L. McDermott Enclosures Murtha Cullina LLP 265 Church Street New Haven, CT 06510 T 203.772.7700 F 203.772.7723 9831680v1 Phase I Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of the Chatfield Solar Farm in the Town of Killingworth, Connecticut November 2018 ACS ◆◆◆ Archaeological Consulting Services ◆◆◆ Phase I Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey Chatfield Solar Farm Town of Killingworth, Connecticut by Gregory F. Walwer, Ph.D. and Dorothy N. Walwer, M.A. of ACS for Loureiro Engineering Associates, Inc. 100 Fort Hill Road Groton, CT 06340 (860) 448-0400 November, 2018 ACS — Archaeological Consulting Services ——— 118 Whitfield Street Guilford, Connecticut 06437 (203) 458-0550 www.acsarchaeology.com [email protected] Abstract This report contains the results of a Phase I archaeological reconnaissance survey conducted by ACS (Archaeological Consulting Services) during the month of November, 2018.
    [Show full text]