Fact Sheet Ocfentanil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

FACT SHEET Ocfentanil May 2017 For more information, please contact: Dr. P. Blanckaert Coordinator Belgian Early Warning System Drugs Scientific Institute of Public Health National Focal Point on Drugs Jyliette Wytsmanstraat 14 B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel : 02/642 5408 [email protected] Science at the service of Public health, Food chain safety and Environment. The information in this message is exclusively meant for the EWS-network, and was sent to you, as a member of this network, in a confidential way. Therefore the information in this message may not be copied, transferred or made public without the prior permission of the WIV-ISP. The WIV-ISP takes responsibility for the editing of a press release, if considered as necessary in the framework of its mission. The information contained in this document is also available on the BEWSD-website (with corresponding pdf-files and analytical data). This part of the website is not accessible for the general public. A login can be requested by contacting [email protected]. © Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels 2011 This report may not be reproduced, published or distributed without the consent of the ISP | WIV. A. General information Recent death cases in Belgium Substance: Ocfentanil (mixture with caffeine and paracetamol) Discovered in vicinity of deceased victim Date of death: May 2017 Product type: powder Region: Ghent Substance: Ocfentanil (mixture with caffeine and paracetamol) Date of collection: March 2015 Date of analysis: April 2015 Product type: powder Color: brown Region: Dendermonde Created April 2015 Updated May 2017 Type Narcotic Drugs Group Opioids Name Ocfentanil (A-3217) Nature of substance Ocfentanil is a potent synthetic opioid substance structurally related to fentanyl. Compound with a methoxy group instead of a methylgroup, and a fluorine atom placed on the benzene ring. When studied as a supplement to general anaesthesia, researchers concluded that ocfentanil had a similar mode of action to fentanyl and 3 micrograms of ocfentanil was approximately equivalent to 5 micrograms of fentanyl. Systematic chemical name N-(2-fluorophenyl)-2-methoxy-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]acetamide Other names / B. Alerts Alerts Belgium: fatal intoxication linked to the consumption (sniffing) of Ocfentanil, March 2015. Reported by Eurofins forensic lab. A brown powder was found in the house of the victim, containing caffeine, paracetamol and Ocfentanil. Post-mortem blood analysis contained Ocfentanil. The sample was purchased with the use of bitcoins on the internet (darknet?). Reports to EMCDDA Belgium: On 8 April 2015, the Belgian NFP reported the analysis of this sample of Ocfentanil, found during the house-search of a victim of fatal intoxication. The Netherlands: On 24 October 2013, the Dutch FP reported a seizure of white powder seized by the police in September 2013. It was a component of a paracetamol caffeine mixture sold at the drug market as synthetic heroin. Estonia: On 3 March 2017 the Estonian FP reported a seizure of 1,01g white powder seized on 23.04.2016 by the Customs at Tallinn. Post delivery from Netherlands. Sweden: On 29 September 2016 the Swedish FP reported a seizure of 0,97 g and 1,18 g brown pieces (similar to haschish), seized on 14.01.2016 by the Customs at Stockholm. Containing also Paracetamol, coffeine. The substance has been analytically confirmed by GC-MS and TLC at The Swedish Customs Laboratory. France: On 24 June 2016 the French FP reported 3 intoxications that occurred on 31.10.2015. Denmark: On 23 June 2016 the Danish FP reported a seizure of 1g brown powder seized on 22.05.2016 by the Customs at Copenhagen International postoffice. Containing also Caffeine, paracetamol, mannitol. Sent from the Netherlands to Denmark. Packed in a zip bag between several layers of white paper and in a white envelope. Germany: On 29 January 2016 the German FP reported a death case that ocurred on 12.03.2015. Sweden: On 18 December 2015 the Swedish FP reported a seizure of 0.9 g brown powder seized on 2015-11-25 by the Customs at Stockholm. The substance was identified by the Swedish National Forensic Centre (NFC) using GC-MS, LC-HRMS and NMR. Spain: On 2 October 2015 the Spanish FP reported that on June 3rd , 2015, a few milligrams sample of OCFENTANYL was collected by Energy Control´s Drug Checking Service from a user in Madrid (Autonomous Community of Madrid). Sample consisted of a white-coloured powder. Product was sold as heroin on the Internet (160 €/gram). User bought it in March 2015. C. Pictures Powder found in the 2015 case, Belgium. Powder collected and analysed by Wedinos, UK Seizure of brown pieces, Sweden, January 2016 D. Clinical information / Use & Risks Usage Ocfentanil (INN) is an opioid analgesic that is an analogue of fentanyl was developed in the early 1990s. It is similar to fentanyl in effects, producing strong analgesia and sedation, but is slightly more potent. Side effects of fentanyl analogues are similar to those of fentanyl, and include itching, nausea and potentially serious respiratory depression which can be life-threatening. Belgian case of 2015 reported administration through sniffing. Ocfentanil is a potent synthetic opioid structurally related to fentanyl. It was developed as one of a series of potent naloxone-reversible opioids in an attempt to obtain an opioid that had better therapeutic indices in terms of cardiovascular effects and respiratory depression as compared to fentanyl. Study of the analgesic activity of ocfentanil using the mouse hot plate test gave an ED50 of 0.007 mg/kg compared to 0.018 mg/kg for fentanyl; ocfentanil being approximately 2.5 times as potent as fentanyl in this test. In human volunteers ocfentanil induces effective analgesia at 1 μg/kg, while in doses up to 3 μg/kg, analgesia and respiratory depression occurred in a dose-dependent manner. While a further study suggests that ocfentanil may be as effective as morphine in post-operative relief. Ocfentanil was also studied as a supplement to general anaesthesia, in which the researchers concluded that it appears to be similar in action to fentanyl, with 3 μg/kg of ocfentanil approximately equivalent to 5 μg/kg of fentanyl. Modes and scope of the established or expected use Epidemiology What is the availability of ocfentanil on the drug market? It appears that ocfentanil is not being openly sold on the surface web by means of web pages advertising the substance. Reports to the EMCDDA suggest availability of ocfentanil on the dark net. The total amount of ocfentanil seized reported to the EMCDDA between 2014 – 2016 does not exceed 200 grams. The last reported seizure occurred in May 2016. The apparent low amounts of ocfentanil seized should be interpreted in the context of its potency as an analgesic. Fentanyl and its derivatives have been linked with the recent surge in overdose deaths in the USA and Canada. Misuse of fentanyl has also been reported in Estonia as one of the major causes of drug-related deaths. It should also be noted that ocfentanil has been controlled in China since October 2015. Who is using ocfentanil and why? The available data suggests that ocfentanil can be unknowingly used by those seeking heroin; data also suggests that those on opioid substitution programs (such as methadone clinics) and psychonauts may actively seek ocfentanil. Health risks Pharmacology and toxicology The available data suggests that ocfentanil is a potent opioid similar in structure to fentanyl, the effects of which are reversed by naloxone. It is not specified in the literature which opioid receptors ocfentanil is active at, but it does result in typical fentanyl adverse effects with its ability to cause respiratory depression, bradycardia and hypotension. In mouse hot plate test, ocfentanil produced an ED50 of 7.7 µg/kg compared with fentanyl at 18 µg/kg and morphine at 10100 µg/kg in vivo. Based on the results of this test, ocfentanil is roughly 2.5 times as potent as fentanyl and 1,300 times more potent than morphine. A study by Fletcher and co-workers reported that a 3 µg/Kg dose of ocfentanil produced an equivalent level of analgesia to 5 µg/kg of fentanyl in humans. They do state however, that it was impossible to determine an exact potency relationship from their study and it is important to be aware that differences in the sensitivity and pharmacodynamics of opioids occur when comparing information from in vivo to humans. It has been reported that ocfentanil has a greater therapeutic index (TI) than fentanyl. The therapeutic index is a ratio that quantifies the ‘safety’ margin of a compound. A large therapeutic index results in a greater safety margin between the therapeutic dose and toxic effects. A small therapeutic index results in the opposite and a smaller window between the therapeutic dose and toxic effects. In the tail-flick test (conscious freely moving rat), the TI for respiratory depression of ocfentanil was 7.80 and 5.00 for fentanyl. Whilst in the hot plate test this was 5.90 for ocfentanil and 2.50 for fentanyl. This shows that in the hot plate test that ocfentanil has double the therapeutic index of fentanyl and 1.3 times greater in the tail-flick test. Leslie and co-workers have also reported that the therapeutic index of ocfentanil was consistently greater than that of fentanyl. Although the therapeutic index is higher for ocfentanil, it cannot be considered ‘safe’ due to its higher potency relative to morphine and fentanyl. Self-reported effects Limited data is available on the subjective effects of ocfentanil. Two users who submitted samples to drug checking services reported “distinct, short-acting opioid- like effects”.
Recommended publications
  • Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017

    Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017

    Q UO N T FA R U T A F E BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 BR 111 / 2017 The Minister responsible for health, in exercise of the power conferred by section 48A(1) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979, makes the following Order: Citation 1 This Order may be cited as the Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017. Repeals and replaces the Third and Fourth Schedule of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 2 The Third and Fourth Schedules to the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 are repealed and replaced with— “THIRD SCHEDULE (Sections 25(6); 27(1))) DRUGS OBTAINABLE ONLY ON PRESCRIPTION EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED IN THE FOURTH SCHEDULE (PART I AND PART II) Note: The following annotations used in this Schedule have the following meanings: md (maximum dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered at any one time. 1 PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 mdd (maximum daily dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance that is contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered in any period of 24 hours. mg milligram ms (maximum strength) i.e. either or, if so specified, both of the following: (a) the maximum quantity of the substance by weight or volume that is contained in the dosage unit of a medicinal product; or (b) the maximum percentage of the substance contained in a medicinal product calculated in terms of w/w, w/v, v/w, or v/v, as appropriate.
  • Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and Its Analogues in Biological Specimens

    Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and Its Analogues in Biological Specimens

    Recommended methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2017 Note Operating and experimental conditions are reproduced from the original reference materials, including unpublished methods, validated and used in selected national laboratories as per the list of references. A number of alternative conditions and substitution of named commercial products may provide comparable results in many cases. However, any modification has to be validated before it is integrated into laboratory routines. ST/NAR/53 Original language: English © United Nations, November 2017. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Acknowledgements The Laboratory and Scientific Section of the UNODC (LSS, headed by Dr. Justice Tettey) wishes to express its appreciation and thanks to Dr. Barry Logan, Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, at the Fredric Rieders Family Founda- tion and NMS Labs, United States; Amanda L.A.
  • Understanding and Challenging the Drugs: Chemistry and Toxicology

    Understanding and Challenging the Drugs: Chemistry and Toxicology

    UNDERSTANDING AND CHALLENGING THE DRUGS: CHEMISTRY AND TOXICOLOGY Presenter: • Dr. Jasmine Drake, Graduate Program Director and Assistant Professor, Administration of Justice Department, Barbara Jordan-Mickey Leland School of Public Affairs, Texas Southern University NACDL Training Defending Drug Overdose Homicides in Pennsylvania Penn State Harrisburg, Middletown, PA November 6th, 2019 11:30- 12:45 p.m. Understanding & Challenging the Drugs: Chemistry & Toxicology Dr. Jasmine Drake, Forensic Science Learning Laboratory, Texas Southern University I. Opioid Drug Classifications A. Types of Opioids B. Classic vs. Synthetic C. Toxicology of Opioids 1) How opioids interact with the body 2) Addiction (psychological vs. physiological II. New Classes of Drugs A. Emerging Threats B. Potency III. National Trends in Opioid Overdose Deaths in the U.S. A. Based on State B. Ethnicity C. Drug-Type (prescription vs. fentanyl vs. heroin) IV. Trends of Opioid Overdose Deaths in Philadelphia A. Based on Ethnicity B. Drug Type (prescription vs. fentanyl vs. heroin) V. Legal Considerations to the Opioid Epidemic A. Punitive Measures vs. Rehabilitative Treatment B. Progressive Jurisdictions Nationwide C. New Legal Measures in Philadelphia VI. Toxicology Reports A. What’s in the report? B. Key Aspects of the Tox Report C. Terminology D. Evaluating and Interpreting the data? E. Questions and considerations. VII. Conclusion and Discussion A. Case Specific Examples B. Sample Toxicology Reports The Opioid Epidemic: What labs have to do with it? Ewa King, Ph.D. Associate Director of Health RIDOH State Health Laboratories Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Overview • Overdose trends • Opioids and their effects • Analytical testing approaches • Toxicology laboratories Analysis. Answers. Action.
  • UCSF UC San Francisco Previously Published Works

    UCSF UC San Francisco Previously Published Works

    UCSF UC San Francisco Previously Published Works Title Fentanyl, fentanyl analogs and novel synthetic opioids: A comprehensive review Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8xh0s7nf Authors Armenian, Patil Vo, Kathy Barr-Walker, Jill et al. Publication Date 2017-10-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Fentanyl, fentanyl analogs and novel synthetic opioids: A comprehensive review Patil Armenian, Kathy Vo, Jill Barr-Walker, Kara Lynch University of California, San Francisco-Fresno and University of California, San Francisco Keywords: opioid, synthetic opioids, fentanyl, fentanyl analog, carfentanil, naloxone Abbreviations: 4-ANPP: 4-anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine; ANPP 4Cl-iBF: 4-chloroisobutyryfentanyl 4F-iBF: 4-fluoroisobutyrfentanyl AEI: Advanced electronic information AMF: alpha-methylfentanyl CBP: US Customs and Border Protection CDC: Centers for Disease Control CDSA: Controlled Drug and Substance Act (Canada) CNS: central nervous system DEA: US Drug Enforcement Agency DTO: Drug trafficking organization ED: Emergency department ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay EMCDDA: European Monitoring Centre for Drug and Drug Addiction FDA: US Food and Drug Administration GC-MS: gas chromatography mass spectrometry ICU: intensive care unit IN: intranasal IV: intravenous LC-HRMS: liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry LC-MS/MS: liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry MDA: United Kingdom Misuse of Drugs Act NPF: non-pharmaceutical fentanyl THF-F: tetrahydrofuranfentanyl US: United States USPS: US Postal Service UNODC: United Nations office on drugs and crime 1. Introduction The death rate due to opioid analgesics nearly quadrupled in the US from 1999 to 2011 and was responsible for 33,091 deaths in 2015 (CDC, 2014; Rudd et al., 2016).
  • Use of Fentanyl, Butyrfentanyl and Furanylfentanyl As Discussed on Polish Online Forums Devoted to ‘Designer Drugs’

    Use of Fentanyl, Butyrfentanyl and Furanylfentanyl As Discussed on Polish Online Forums Devoted to ‘Designer Drugs’

    Psychiatr. Pol. ONLINE FIRST Nr 219: 1–18 Published ahead of print 12 March 2021 www.psychiatriapolska.pl ISSN 0033-2674 (PRINT), ISSN 2391-5854 (ONLINE) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/128156 Use of fentanyl, butyrfentanyl and furanylfentanyl as discussed on Polish online forums devoted to ‘designer drugs’ Monika Kacela, Jakub Wojcieszak, Jolanta B. Zawilska Medical University of Lodz, Department of Pharmacodynamics Summary Aim. The study was aimed to analyze information posted by users of synthetic opioids on Polish online drug discussion forums. Special emphasis was given to sources of drugs and their availability, routes of administration, dosages, expected and toxic effects. Material and methods. 6,143 reports related to synthetic opioids, posted between 2005 and mid 2019 on three widely available popular Polish online forums devoted to psychoactive substances, i.e., https://hyperreal.info/talk, https://dopek.info and https://forum.dopalamy, were collected and analyzed. The article presents data on three most popular opioids, i.e., fentanyl, butyrfentanyl and furanylfentanyl. Results. Fentanyl was the most widely used and relatively easily accessible synthetic opioid in Poland. Butyrfentanyl and furanylfentanyl were far less popular. The main source of fentanyl was diversion of medicines, notably transdermal patches. Fentanyl, butyrfentanyl and furanylfentanyl are administered orally, buccally, sublingually, intranasally, by inhalation and intravenously. Concomitant use of fentanyl and its derivatives with other psychoactive compounds increases the risk of severe adverse effects. Conclusions. Our study contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of problems related to abuse of fentanyl, butyrfentanyl and furanylfentanyl in Poland. In the light of the relatively high popularity of pharmaceutical fentanyl used for non-medical purposes, there is an urgent need for more strict control over illegal sales of fentanyl transdermal preparations via the Internet, as well as disposal of used patches.
  • No Moral Panic: Public Health Responses to Illicit Fentanyls

    No Moral Panic: Public Health Responses to Illicit Fentanyls

    No Moral Panic: Public Health Responses to Illicit Fentanyls Testimony of Daniel Ciccarone, M.D., M.P.H. Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco Before the House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security United States House of Representatives Hearing: Fentanyl Analogues: Perspectives on Class Scheduling January 28, 2020 Chair Bass, Vice-Chair Demings, Ranking Member Ratcliffe and other distinguished members of the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security, thank you very much for the opportunity to testify before you today. It is indeed an honor to be here. My name is Dan Ciccarone. I am professor of family and community medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. I have been a clinician for over 30 years and an academic researcher in the area of substance use with a focus on the medical and public health consequences of heroin use for the past 20 years. I have been asked to speak on my perspective on the class scheduling of fentanyl analogues and how these regulations might work counter to the goals of public health. My research and that of my team is multidisciplinary and multi-level. We use the tools of epidemiology, anthropology, statistics, economics, clinical and basic sciences. I am appreciative of my funder, which is the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, as well as my team, which includes Dr. Jay Unick, University of Maryland, Dr. Sarah G. Mars, UCSF, Dr. Dan Rosenblum, Dalhousie University, and Dr. Georgiy Bobashev from RTI, North Carolina.
  • General Agreement on Tariffs Andtrade

    General Agreement on Tariffs Andtrade

    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT TAR/W/87/Rev.1 16 June 1994 ON TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution (94-1266) Committee on Tariff Concessions HARMONIZED COMMODITY DESCRIPTION AND CODING SYSTEM (Harmonized System) Classification of INN Substances Revision The following communication has been received from the Nomenclature and Classification Directorate of the Customs Co-operation Council in Brussels. On 25 May 1993, we sent you a list of the INN substances whose classification had been discussed and decided by the Harmonized System Committee. At the time, we informed you that the classification of two substances, clobenoside and meclofenoxate, would be decided later. Furthermore, for some of the chemicals given in that list, one of the contracting parties had entered a reservation and the Harmonized System Committee therefore reconsidered its earlier decision in those cases. I am therefore sending you herewith a revised complete list of the classification decisions of the INN substances. In this revised list, two substances have been added and the classifications of two have been revised as explained below: (a) Addition Classification of clobenoside, (subheading 2940.00) and meclofenoxate (subheading 2922.19). (b) Amendment Etafedrine and moxidentin have now been reclassified in subheadings 2939.40 and 2932.29 respectively. The list of INN substances reproduced hereafter is available only in English. TAR/W/87/Rev. 1 Page 2 Classification of INN Substances Agreed by the Harmonized System Committee in April 1993 Revision Description HS Code
  • OCFENTANIL Critical Review Report Agenda Item 4.5

    OCFENTANIL Critical Review Report Agenda Item 4.5

    OCFENTANIL Critical Review Report Agenda Item 4.5 Expert Committee on Drug Dependence Thirty-ninth Meeting Geneva, 6-10 November 2017 39th ECDD (2017) Agenda item 4.5 Ocfentanil Page 2 of 17 39th ECDD (2017) Agenda item 4.5 Ocfentanil Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................... 5 Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Substance identification ........................................................................................................... 7 A. International non-proprietary name (INN) ...................................................................................... 7 B. Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registry number .......................................................................... 7 C. Other names ..................................................................................................................................... 7 D. Trade names ..................................................................................................................................... 7 E. Street names ..................................................................................................................................... 7 F. Physical properties ........................................................................................................................... 7 G. WHO review history ........................................................................................................................
  • 16.19.20 Nmac 1 Title 16 Occupational And

    16.19.20 Nmac 1 Title 16 Occupational And

    TITLE 16 OCCUPATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING CHAPTER 19 PHARMACISTS PART 20 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES 16.19.20.1 ISSUING AGENCY: Regulation and Licensing Department - Board of Pharmacy. [16.19.20.1 NMAC - Rp 16.19.20.1 NMAC, 06-26-2018] 16.19.20.2 SCOPE: All persons or entities that manufacture, distribute, dispense, administer, prescribe, deliver, analyze, or conduct research using controlled substances. [16.19.20.2 NMAC - Rp 16.19.20.2 NMAC, 06-26-2018] 16.19.20.3 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: Section 30-31-11 of the Controlled Substances Act, 30-31-1 through 30-31-42 NMSA 1978, authorizes the board of pharmacy to promulgate regulations and charge reasonable fees for the registration and control of the manufacture, distribution and dispensing of controlled substances. [16.19.20.3 NMAC - Rp 16.19.20.3 NMAC, 06-26-2018] 16.19.20.4 DURATION: Permanent. [16.19.20.4 NMAC - Rp 16.19.20.4 NMAC, 06-26-2018] 16.19.20.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 26, 2018, unless a different date is cited at the end of a section. [16.19.20.5 NMAC - Rp 16.19.20.5 NMAC, 06-26-2018] 16.19.20.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective of Part 20 of Chapter 19 is to protect the public health and welfare of the citizens of New Mexico by controlling and monitoring access to controlled substances and to give notice of the board’s designation of particular substances as controlled substances. [16.19.20.6 NMAC - Rp 16.19.20.6 NMAC, 06-26-2018] 16.19.20.7 DEFINITIONS: [RESERVED] [16.19.20.7 NMAC - Rp 16.19.20.7 NMAC, 06-26-2018] 16.19.20.8 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS: Persons required to register: A.
  • The International Drug Control Conventions

    The International Drug Control Conventions

    ST/CND/1/Add.1/Rev.3 The International Drug Control Conventions Schedules of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol, as at 22 April 2017 UNITED NATIONS New York, 2017 ST/CND/1/Add.1/Rev.3 © United Nations, 2017. All rights reserved, worldwide. Schedules of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 as amended by the 1972 Protocol, as at 22 April 2017 List of drugs included in Schedule I Acetorphine 3-O-Acetyltetrahydro-7α-(1-hydroxy-1-methylbutyl)- 6,14-endo-ethenooripavine Acetyl-alpha-methylfentanyl N-[1-(α-Methylphenethyl)-4-piperidyl]acetanilide Acetylfentanyl N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl]acetamide Acetylmethadol 3-Acetoxy-6-dimethylamino-4,4-diphenylheptane AH-7921 3,4-dichloro-N-{[1- (dimethylamino)cyclohexyl]methyl}benzamide Alfentanil N-[1-[2-(4-Ethyl-4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1H-tetrazol-1-yl) ethyl]-4-(methoxymethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-N- phenylpropanamide Allylprodine 3-Allyl-1-methyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine Alphacetylmethadol α-3-Acetoxy-6-dimethylamino-4,4-diphenylheptane Alphameprodine α-3-Ethyl-1-methyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine Alphamethadol α-6-Dimethylamino-4,4-diphenyl-3-heptanol alpha-Methylfentanyl N-[1-(α-Methylphenethyl)-4-piperidyl]propionanilide alpha-Methylthiofentanyl N-[1-[1-Methyl-2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]-4-piperidyl] propionanilide Alphaprodine α-l,3-Dimethyl-4-phenyl-4-propionoxypiperidine Anileridine 1-p-Aminophenethyl-4-phenylpiperidine-4-carboxylic acid ethyl ester Benzethidine 1-(2-Benzyloxyethyl)-4-phenylpiperidine-4-carboxylic acid ethyl ester
  • Fentanyl and Fentanyl Analogues Dear Judge Pryor

    Fentanyl and Fentanyl Analogues Dear Judge Pryor

    FEDERAL DEFENDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES COMMITTEE Lyric Office Centre 440 Louisiana Street, Suite 1350 Houston, Texas 77002-1634 Chair: Marjorie Meyers Phone: 713.718.4600 November 13, 2017 Honorable William H. Pryor, Jr. Acting Chair United States Sentencing Commission One Columbus Circle, N.E. Suite 2-500, South Lobby Washington, D.C. 20002-8002 Re: Public Comment on Fentanyl and Fentanyl Analogues Dear Judge Pryor: The Commission seeks comment on a number of issues related to fentanyl and fentanyl analogues. Because fentanyl and its analogues account for very few federal drug trafficking offenses,1 and unlike other drugs,2 there has been no reported litigation regarding the appropriate drug equivalency or whether a substance was a fentanyl analogue, most of the information the Commission receives during the comment period will not be derived from federal cases. Defenders have strongly encouraged the Commission to undertake a comprehensive review of the direct harms caused by particular doses of all drugs in the guidelines and amend the guidelines to create proportionate sentences. Such a comprehensive approach is necessary because focusing on a spotlighted drug like fentanyl and its analogues would only exacerbate the disproportionalities in §2D1.1. Much of the disparity created in the drug guidelines is a result of the Commission repeatedly increasing sentences for whatever drug is the current cause cèlebrè with no evidence that increased penalties reduce use or deter distribution.3 1 USSC, Quick Facts: Drug Trafficking Offenses (July 2017) (in FY 2016, crack cocaine, methamphetamine, powder, heroin, oxycodone, and marijuana accounted for 96.3% of drug trafficking offenses). 2 Most of the federal litigation regarding analogues or the appropriate drug quantity has involved synthetic cathinones, cannabinoids, and MDMA even though they account for fewer drug trafficking offenses than the six drugs discussed in the Quick Facts report).
  • INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD FENTANYL-RELATED Substancesa with NO KNOWN LEGITIMATE USES

    INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD FENTANYL-RELATED Substancesa with NO KNOWN LEGITIMATE USES

    INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD a FENTANYL-RELATED SUBSTANCES WITH NO KNOWN LEGITIMATE USES Abbrev- CAS Intl No. Uses b Common Substance Name Other/ Alternative Substance Name(s) c iations No.d Ctrl.e 1 Unknown 2,2'-difluorofentanyl N-(1-(2-fluorophenethyl)piperidin-4-yl)-N-(2- fluorophenyl)propionamide; 2'-ortho-difluorofentanyl; 2'-fluoro ortho- fluorofentanyl 2 Unknown 2-fluoro butyrfentanyl N-(2-fluorophenyl)-N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl) butyramide 3 No 2-fluorofentanyl ortho-fluorofentanyl; N-(2-fluorophenyl)-N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4- 2-FF; o-FF Known yl)propionamide Uses 4 Unknown 2-furanylethyl fentanyl N-[1-[2-(2-furanyl)ethyl]-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenyl-propanamide 1443-49- 8 (HCl) 5 Unknown 2-isopropylfuranyl fentanyl 2-isopropyl furanyl fentanyl; ortho-isopropyl furanyl fentanyl; N-(2- 2-isopropyl isopropylphenyl)-N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)furan-2-carboxamide; Fu-F 2-Furanylfentanyl ortho-2-isopropylphenyl analogue 6 Unknown 2-methoxy furanyl fentanyl N-(2-methoxyphenyl)-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-2- 2-methoxy 101343- furancarboxamide; 2-Furanylfentanyl ortho-2-methoxyphenyl FuF; 2-Meo- 50-4 analogue; ortho-methoxy furanyl fentanyl FuF 7 Unknown 2-methyl furanyl fentanyl N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-(o-tolyl)furan-2-carboxamide 2-methyl FuF 8 Unknown 3-allyl fentanyl N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-3-(prop-2-en-1-yl)piperidin-4- 82208- yl]propanamide 84-2 9 Unknown 3-fluoro butyrfentanyl N-(3-fluorophenyl)-N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl) butyramide 10 Unknown 3-fluorofentanyl meta-fluorofentanyl; N-(3-fluorophenyl)-N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-