Chapter 4 – Wilhelm Wundt and the Founding of Psychology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 4 – Wilhelm Wundt and the Founding of Psychology Origin of Third Degree The classification of the qualities of objects by degree - heat and cold, moisture and dryness etc. - was commonplace in the middle ages. Henry Lyte's translation of Dodoens' Niewe herball or historie of plantes, 1578 includes a description of rue: "Rue is hoate and dry in the thirde degree." Shakespeare went on to apply the degree classification to drink, in Twelfth Night, 1602: "For he s in the third degree of drinke: hee's drown'd: go looke after him.” Present Meaning “The third degree” is well-known to all US crime- fiction enthusiasts as “an intensive, possibly brutal interrogation” appearing as early as Forbes (1900) In Masonic lodges there are three degrees of membership: Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, and Master Mason. When a candidate receives the third degree in a Masonic lodge, he is subjected to some activities that involve an interrogation and it is more physically challenging than the first two degrees. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Xjs6iTjdJc&feature=player_embedded CHAPTER 7 – GESTALT PSYCHOLOGY IN GERMANY & THE UNITED STATES Dr. Nancy Alvarado Gestalt Psychology This was the major alternative and challenge to structuralism during the early 20th century. Founded by the successors to the people in Chapter 6. Gestalt means “shape” or “form.” Major proponents: Max Wertheimer – developed Gestalt principles Kurt Koffka – developed laws of perception Wolfgang Kohler – worked with apes on insight Kurt Lewin – developed “Field theory” Conceptual Foundations Gestalt Psychology grew out of the perceptual theories of physicist Ernst Mach and the experimental work of Christian von Ehrenfels. Mach described properties of spatial and auditory forms (squares, circles, simple melodies). As perceptual wholes these forms have qualities that distinguish them from their elements (parts). Its form quality gives an object perceptual or psychological permanence despite changes in sensation A song sung by different voices remains the same song. Max Wertheimer (1880-1943) Wertheimer studied under Stumpf in Berlin, then Kulpe in Prague (psychology of legal testimony). Fascinated by the apparent motion of objects outside a train window, he bought a stroboscope to study “where does movement come from?” Schumann loaned him a tachistoscope and introduced him to Koffka and Kohler (students of Stumpf). Apparent motion of a white stripe from horizontal to vertical was demonstrated. Phi Phenomenon Demos http://www.michaelbach.de/ot/mot_reverse- phi/index.html http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/George_Mat her/TwoStrokeFlash.htm Early stroboscopic entertainment devices Four Principles of Gestalt Thinking Holistic thinking – the whole is always more than the sum of its parts, called supersummativity. Phenomenological basis – analyzing the essence of phenomena is the subject matter of psychology. Methodology – lifelike experiments using small numbers of subjects. Isomorphism – psychological processes are directly related to biological (brain) processes. Tactile Phi Perceptions Benussi showed that when two points on the skin are stimulated the stimulus appears to move in an arc through space, like a flea hopping. Von Bekesy produced a tactile phi perception of a vibration jumping from knee to knee or between. Geldard & Sherrick produced a progression of jumps up the arm from wrist to elbow (like a rabbit). In all of these, the perceptual experience had a property (movement) not present in the components. Rubin’s Vase The figure emerges as a whole, not piecemeal, demonstrating that perceptions are active, lively and organized, not passive receivers of stimuli. Gestalt Principles of Perception proximity similarity good closure continuation (good gestalt) Good Gestalts Poor performance on perceptual closure tests (right) has been associated with right hemisphere impairment. Generality of Gestalt Principles Closure applies to memory, not just visual stimuli. Waiters can remember checks until the bill is paid. Zeigarnik Effect -- she gave 18-22 tasks but interrupted half part-way through. Later, interrupted tasks were 90% more likely to be recalled. TV cliff-hanger episodes generate tension. Alpha the chimp filled in the missing wedge of a pie-shaped figure. Results with other chimps produced inconsistent results, perhaps because they were too young. Illusions and the Physical World Koffka distinguished between the geographic environment and the behavioral environment. The man in the snowstorm who crossed a lake not a plain without knowing it. His behavioral environment was plain, not lake. In both cases, the horizontal line seems shorter than the vertical one, yet they are the same lengths. Ascendancy of Gestalt Psychology Despite the turmoil in Germany after WWI, Gestalt Psychology flourished in the 1920’s. Wolfgang Kohler succeeded Carl Stumpf as director of the Berlin Psychological Institute. A decade later, the Nazi’s wrecked it. In 1933, Jewish professors, including Wertheimer, Kohler & Koffka, were expelled from the university (27 psychologists). Many were assisted in finding jobs in the USA, some at the NYC New School for Social Research (Univ. in Exile). Nazi Collaboration & Heroic Opposition Germany’s most celebrated philosopher, Heidegger, supported the Nazi’s anti-intellectualism & Hitler. Under Nazi leadership, Wundt’s lab became a folk- cell or center for ultra-nationalistic activities. Kohler (not Jewish) vigorously opposed the Nazis. He wrote the last anti-Nazi article published, mocked the Hitler salute and gave an anti-Nazi lecture. He refused to take a loyalty oath to Hitler and agitated for reinstatement of Jewish colleagues. He emigrated in 1935, going to Swarthmore. The University in Exile Wertheimer studied human thought and education at the New School for Social Research (1933). Fromm’s interviews with major scientists at the New School was lost until republished in 1997. Wertheimer wrote “Productive Thinking” (1945) recommending a Gestalt approach to teaching. He developed new methods of teaching math and thought insightful productive thinking could be cultivated in all children (not just math geniuses). Wolfgang Kohler (1887-1967) Kohler studied with Stumpf, then went to the Canary Islands (Tenerife) to study primates and was stranded there for 7 years by WWI. Kohler questioned the S-R learning approach of Thorndike (trial & error), arguing that animals are capable of reasoning in the right context. He said animals were unable to demonstrate higher level reasoning in puzzle boxes. He devised situations that animals could solve using insight. Barrier Problems (Umwegen) G Dogs and one-year-old children could do this task Barrier easily but chickens could not. S House Wall Experiments with Chimps Chimps seemed to use insight to solve more complicated problems involving combining tools or using objects to reach bananas, with transfer. They seemed to have moments of insight, jumping up with inspiration after giving up on a problem. Animals were tested in social situations where they learned by observation and imitation. Kohler reported his results descriptively without numbers and statistical interpretations. British intelligence thought he was a spy. Transposition I II In both tasks the chicken pecks the square on the right. II Predicted by Predicted by III S-R theory Gestalt theory Are chickens recognizing a particular gray stimulus or are they making a comparative judgment? Other Studies Apes were able to find buried food immediately but not after a delay – ape memory is limited. He demonstrated that fear is not a learned response by showing that apes reacted with fear to novel stimuli such as camels or masks not paired with punishment. Sample devil masks used in Sri Lankan dancing (Ceylon) where the Cingalese people live. Kurt Lewin (1890-1947) Lewin studied in Berlin under Stumpf but found Wundtian psychology irrelevant and dull. He organized a series of workers classes to teach basic skills -- considered subversive by the university. He volunteered for WWI winning an Iron Cross, then published “The War Landscape” describing the soldier’s experience of the war. He used terms like life space, boundary, direction and zone, which became important in his later topological theory & described depersonalization of the enemy. Kurt Lewin Applied Interests Returning to the Berlin Psychological Institute, he found Gestalt psychology interesting but had a more applied focus. Two papers on the laborer in agriculture and industry. In 1919 he returned to the idea of life space, comparing agricultural and industrial spaces. He criticized the time-and-motion studies of Frederick Winslow Taylor (Principles of Scientific Management), arguing work has life value and must be humanized. He inspired Zeigarnik’s research on waiter’s recall. Topological Psychology An individual is a complex energy field, a dynamic system of needs and tensions directing behavior: B f (P, E) where behavior (B) is a function f of a person (P) interacting with an environment (E). Each person moves in a life space that contains goals with positive or negative valence. Goals create vectors that attract or repel. He used non-quantitative geometry to represent this Lewin’s Eggs (Potatoes) Nonpsychological E (P) E Nonpsychological Lewin used diagrams like this to describe life spaces Studies of Child Behavior Lewin criticized statistical approaches to child behavior and conceptions of “the average child.” The totality of a child’s life must be studied and since
Recommended publications
  • Psych Homework
    AP Notes – History and Approaches Early Theories – Where did we come from as a science??? In the beginning – people studied philosophy and physiology – both starting to study the human mind by the 1870s. 1879 - Wilhelm Wundt wanted to study human as a separate group not tied to the other two. In Germany he will establish the first lab to study human beings. This is the official start of psychology. Thus Wundt is the “Father of psychology” Wundt will study consciousness – the awareness of experiences Psychology grows – first 2 schools of thought Structuralism – will be started by Edward Titchner - he had studied under Wundt and then came to the US. Structuralism is based on the notion that we need to analyze consciousness in its basic elements to figure out why things are the way they are. (sensations, the components of vision, hearing, touch) o Introspection – careful, systematic self-observation of one’s own conscious experience. (with structuralism we would train people to analyze their thoughts and then exposed them to perceptual experiments (auditory tones, optical illusions, visual stimuli – then report) Functionalism – we should study the purpose of consciousness, why do we think the way we do, not some meaningless structure. We need to study how people adapt their behavior to their environment. William James will start this school of thought. William James also wrote the first textbook Gestalt – exact opposite of structuralism. We should study the whole not the parts to understand human behavior. (We will come back to this with perception) Max Wertheimer will start this school of thought. Other early view – These are still around Psychoanalysis – Freud – unconscious, repression, defense mechanisms Behaviorism – John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Switching Gestalts on Gestalt Psychology: on the Relation Between Science and Philosophy
    Switching Gestalts on Gestalt Psychology: On the Relation between Science and Philosophy Jordi Cat Indiana University The distinction between science and philosophy plays a central role in meth- odological, programmatic and institutional debates. Discussions of disciplin- ary identities typically focus on boundaries or else on genealogies, yielding models of demarcation and models of dynamics. Considerations of a disci- pline’s self-image, often based on history, often plays an important role in the values, projects and practices of its members. Recent focus on the dynamics of scientiªc change supplements Kuhnian neat model with a role for philoso- phy and yields a model of the evolution of philosophy of science. This view il- luminates important aspects of science and itself contributes to philosophy of science. This interactive model is general yet based on exclusive attention to physics. In this paper and two sequels, I focus on the human sciences and ar- gue that their role in the history of philosophy of science is just as important and it also involves a close involvement of the history of philosophy. The focus is on Gestalt psychology and it points to some lessons for philosophy of science. But, unlike the discussion of natural sciences, the discussion here brings out more complication than explication, and skews certain kinds of generaliza- tions. 1. How Do Science and Philosophy Relate to Each Other? a) As Nietzsche put it in the Genealogy of Morals: “Only that which has no history can be deªned.” This notion should make us wary of Heideggerian etymology, conceptual analysis and even Michael Friedman’s relativized, dialectical, post-Kuhnian Hegelianism alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Objects(1)
    Social Objects(1) Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, Center for Cognitive Science, and National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis University at Buffalo [email protected] 1. Introduction 1.1 Two Dogmas of Reductionism Two persistent tendencies have made themselves felt in the course of philosophical history. On the one hand is the Ockhamite tendency, the tendency to embrace one or other of a small repertoire of simplified ontologies, for example atomism or monism, together with a view according to which more complicated entities are to be ‘reduced’ by one or other means to the favoured class of simples. On the other hand is Cartesianism, the tendency to embrace one or other foundationalist doctrine in epistemology, or in other words to prize episteme at the expense of doxa. The two tendencies reinforce each other mutually. Thus foundationalism tilts the attention of philosophers in the direction of ontological simples, for it is held that in relation to the latter knowledge secure against doubt is more easily attainable. Philosophers are thus shielded from any concern with the complex mesoscopic (medium-sized, middle-range, human-scale) objects of our everyday environment and of the social world, since the latter is, after all, a realm of mere opinion, not worthy of the attention of those striving after rigour. Austrian philosophers have been marked no less than philosophers in other traditions by both of these tendencies. Brentano, especially, was an avowed foundationalist, a proponent of psychological immanentism, and in his later philosophizing he embraced an ontology according to which all objects must belong to the single category of thing or substance.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11: Behaviorism
    Chapter 11: Behaviorism Megan Davis, Nicole Pelley and Stephanie Quinlan Behaviorism (1892-1956) ● Psychology has been the study of the mind since the Greeks ○ The definition of the mind has been debated extensively ○ 20th century: Shift from what the mind was to what it did ■ Mind causes behavior ● New field of research ○ Psychology was redefined with help from animal psychology ○ People started believing humans evolved from animal forms ○ Had to rethink Descartes’ definition of the mind New Directions in Animal Psychology New Directions in Animal Psychology Animal psychology as Romanes begun it, used 2 methods: 1. Anecdotal Method → Collect data 2. Method of Inference → Interpret data Close examination in late 19th, early 20th century. Anecdote → Experiment From Anecdote to Experiment ● Experiment replaced anecdotes and informal, naturalistic experiments ● Aim of animal psychology - produce natural science and anecdote not the path to science ● Two important research programs: ○ Thorndike ○ Pavlov From Anecdote to Experiment Edward Lee Thorndike (1874-1949): ● Initially wanted to study children ● Not many readily available, took up animals ● Studied with William James ● Developed “connectionism” ○ Methodological and theoretical approach to animal learning ○ Formulation of an S-R psychology he called “connectionism” ○ Anecdotal method overestimated animal intelligence From Anecdote to Experiment Thorndike’s Puzzle Boxes ● Trap cat inside box ● Each box opened by cat in different way ● Rewarded with salmon for escaping ○ Ex. of instrumental
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Semiotics
    COGNITIVE SEMIOTICS Multidisciplinary Journal on Meaning and Mind Issue 5 . Fall 2009 PETER LANG Bern · Berlin ' Bruxelles ' Frankfurt am Main · New York · Oxford · Wien COGNITIVE SEMIOTICS EDITORS-IN-CHIEF Per Aage Brandt and Todd Oakley CO-EOrTORS Ana Margarida Abrantes, Tim Adamson, Une Brandt, Riccardo Fusaroli, and Jes Vang EDITORIAL ASSISTANT (official address and address for unsolicited submissions) Larimee Cortnik Department of Cognitive Science Center for Cognition and Culture Case Western Reserve University College of Arts & Sciences Crawford Hall, 612D Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-7179 USA Phone: (+1) 216 368-6538 · Fax: (+1) 216 368-3821 [email protected] COORDINATING EDITOR (general address for solicited submissions and editorial contact) Jes Vang · [email protected] EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Liliana Albertazzi, Bernard Baars, Enrique Bernárdez, Peer Bundgaard, Roberto Casati, Christopher Collins, Seana Coulson, Ian Cross, Terrence Deacon, Merlin Donald, Shaun Gallagher, Barend van Heusden, Robert Innis, Jana M. Iverson, Mark Johnson, Torben Fledelius Knap, Kalevi Kull, Ronald Langacker, Michael Leyton, Ricardo Maldonado, Juana Isabel Mann-Arrese, Erik Myin, Frederic Nef, Pierre Ouellet, Jean-Luc Petit, Jean Petitot, Martina Plümacher, Roberto Poli, Ernst Pöppel, Andreas Roepstorff, Bent Rosenbaum, Maxine Sheets-Johnstone, Chris Sinha, Linda B. Smith, Göran Sonesson, Frederik Stjernfelt, Eve Sweetser, Leonard Talmv, Evan Thompson, Colwyn Trevarthen, Reuven Tsur, Mark Turner, Patrizia Violi, Wolfgang Wildgen, Dan Zahavi, Lawrence Zbikowski, Jordan Zlatev, and Svend Ostergaard. MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSIONS For style guide and other directions for authors go to the journal's website: www.cogniavesemiotics.com PUBUSHING DETAILS © by Verlag Peter Lang AG, Hochfeldstrasse 32, CH-3012 Bern Tel. +41 31 306 17 17; Fax +41 31 306 17 27; E-Mail: [email protected]; Internet: www.peterlang.com All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Comptes Rendus / Book Reviews
    COMPTES RENDUS / BOOK REVIEWS Robin D. Rollinger, Austrian Phenomenology: Brentano, Husserl, Meinong, and Others on Mind and Object. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2008; 326 pages. ISBN: 978-3868380057. Review by Kimberly Baltzer-Jaray, Independent Scholar. Nietzsche was not alone in his skepticism and contempt for systematic philosophy, the stuff Hegel and Kant were made of; in fact on this point he could be called the voice of a generation and a timely man. Many academics in the mid to late 19th century felt a sort of ill will towards phi- losophy, especially given the leaps and bounds happening in science. Philosophy seemed less rigorous, impractical and out of touch with the modern era: who needed to contemplate God, freedom, and immortality when scientists were in their labs or in the field actively discovering laws of energy, plant cells, electromagnetism, radiation and evolution? Meta- physics and epistemology just couldn’t compete with physics and biol- ogy. However, several philosophers in Austria thought they could make philosophy more scientific and definitively show the academic commu- nity that philosophy was not to be retired like a relic of the past, but rather could hold her own as a discipline. One of the most notable groups of philosophers to attempt such a defence of philosophy was the School of Brentano, named after its leader, Franz Brentano, and which included his pupils Carl Stumpf, Anton Marty, Edmund Husserl, Kasimir Twardowski and Christian von Ehrenfels. This is where Rollinger’s book begins. Rollinger’s volume is a collection of revised, previously pub- lished papers. It is a comprehensive and insightful book, a necessity for anyone studying the Austrian philosophical tradition, or the early phe- nomenological movement under Husserl (Munich and Göttingen circles respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology Unit 1
    PSYCHOLOGY Dr.K.Shanthi Assistant Professor & Head PG Department of Social Work Guru Nanak College (Autonomous) Unit 1 Syllabus: Definition of Psychology and its importance and role in social work practice. Scientific basis of psychology. Definition of behaviour. Psychology as a study of individual difference and observable behaviour. Brief history and Fields’ of Psychology. Psychology The word Psychology - derived from Greek literature 'Psyche‘ - 'soul' & 'Logos' - 'the study of': the study of the mind or soul the study of behavior. the systematic study of behavior and experience. is concerned with the experience and behaviour of the individual. Definition of Psychology Psychology is defined as the scientific study of human behaviour and mental processes. - Human behavior - observed directly. - Mental processes - thoughts, feelings, and motives that are not directly observable. Psychology its Importance and role in social work practice Psychology deals with human behaviour, emotions, projections, Cognition, learning and memory are core subject matters for psychology. interaction pattern between heredity and environment aware of individual differences in physical and mental traits and abilities. The theories - help to understand individuals’ behaviour. Psychology its Importance and role in social work practice to understand and analyse human behaviour. to bring about a change in personality through functioning or behaviour modification. In resolving problems related to adjustment. Social Case Work , dealing with individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Semiotics: a Study of Images in Japanese Advertisements
    VISUAL SEMIOTICS: A STUDY OF IMAGES IN JAPANESE ADVERTISEMENTS RUMIKO OYAMA THESIS SUBMIITED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON iN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF LONDON NOVEMBER 1998 BIL LONDON U ABSTRACT 14 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 15 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 16 1.1 THE PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH 16 1.2 DEVELOPMENT OF RESEARCH INTERESTS 16 1.3 LANGUAGE VERSUS VISUALS AS A SEMIOTIC MODE 20 1.4 THE ASPECT OF VISUAL SEMIOTICS TO BE FOCUSED ON: Lexis versus Syntax 23 1.5 CULTURAL VALUE SYSTEMS IN VISUAL SYNTAX: A challenge to the notion of universality 24 Chapter Ii THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 26 2.1 INTRODUCTION 26 2.2 LITERATURE SURVEY ON STUDIES OF IMAGES 27 2.2.1 What is an image? 27 2.2.2 Art history/Art theories 29 2.2.3 Sociological approaches to visual images 36 2.2.4 Cultural approaches to visual images 44 2.2.4.1 Visual images as cultural products 45 2.2.4.2 Visual images from linguistic perspectives 50 2.2.5 Semiotic approaches to visual images 54 2.2.5.1 Saussure, Barthes (traditional semiology I semiotics) 54 2.2.5.2 Film semiotics 59 2 2.2.5.3 Social Semiotics 61 2.2.6 Reflection on the literature survey 66 2.3 A THEORY FOR A SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS OF THE VISUAL 71 2.3.1 Visual semiotics and the three metafunctions 72 2.3.1.1 The Ideational melafunction 73 2.3.1.2 The Textual metafunction 75 2.3.1.3 The Interpersonal metafunction 78 2.4 VERBAL TEXT IN VISUAL COMPOSITION: Critical Discourse Analysis 80 23 INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR A MULTI-MODAL ANALYSIS OF VISUAL AND VERBAL TEXTUAL OBJECTS
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptualization of Computer Technology in the Workplace
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2009 The development of technological management model: A conceptualization of computer technology in the workplace Paul E. Madlock West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Madlock, Paul E., "The development of technological management model: A conceptualization of computer technology in the workplace" (2009). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 2927. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2927 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Development of Technological Management Model: A Conceptualization of Computer Technology in the Workplace Paul E. Madlock Dissertation Submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Communication Studies Theodore A. Avtgis Ph.D., Chair Melanie Booth-Butterfield, Ph.D. Rebecca M. Chory, Ph.D Mathew M. Martin, Ph.D. David Westerman, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurt Lewin and Experimental Psychology in the Interwar Period
    '55#466'21 @744)1%71%"#5("#0'5!&#14"#5 2!6243&')2523&'#F4D3&')DG !& ( ) E @7#4)'1 921 11 #4)'1B #4 4 5'"#16"#4 70 2)"6E 1'9#45'6 6@7#4)'1C 42$D4D 1E #1"4'() #46@ #4#(1"#4 &')2523&'5!&#1(7)6 6 C 42$D'!&#)#")#B & 76!&6#4C PD 42$D4D 84%#1#11 QD 42$D4D'6!&#))D 5& #46#'"'%60SD'QIPR Forward I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Dr. Jürgen Renn, Director of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, who supported my pre-doctoral research from the early ideation, through all of its ups and downs until the final line of the disputatio at the Humboldt University of Berlin. Beyond that, the Institute enabled my research project by granting me a PhD scholarship and providing a fruitful work environment, while the well-organized MPIWG library offered me the opportunity to assemble the majority of the material for this book. I am obliged to Professor Dr. Mitchell Ash for his commentaries and insights from his vast knowledge in the history of psychology, as well as for being part of my PhD committee de- spite the geographical distance. I would like to also thank Dr. Alexandre Métraux for advising me on questions related to Lewin’s philosophy of science. Moreover, I am highly indebted to Dr. Massimilano Badino for his scholarly advice, but even more so for his friendship and moral support whenever I needed it. In addition to that, he en- couraged and prepared me to present my work in a variety of international conferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Von Ehrenfels (1859-1932) and Edgar Rubin (1886-1951)
    CHRISTIAN VON EHRENFELS (1859-1932) AND EDGAR RUBIN (1886-1951) Geert-Jan Boudewijnse Introduction Christian von EHRENFELS was an original and creative thinker. His On ‘Gestalt Qualities’ is an early work that had an immediate impact on the small world of GerGer-- man psychologists. When he was professor at the German University of Prague, he wrote several books, including an opus on sexuality. Like many academics, he had the tendency to be radical and his views on sexuality would not be shared by his contemporaries or by later generations. Hence, his fi rst article on Gestalt perception was his only paper that resonated; all his other studies seem to have had no effect on psychology. I will compare EHRENFELS’ notions on Gestalt perception as he developed them in his seminal article with Edgar RUBIN’s (1886-1951) explanation of the fi gure- ground phenomenon. RUBIN was a Danish psychologist and a student of Harold HÖFFDING (1843-1931). He worked for two years in G.E. MÜLLER’s laboratory at Götingen, and in 1915 he published the results of those experiments in Danish (Synsoplevende Figurer). This book was translated into German in 1921 under the title Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. It is this translation that I will refer to. Michael WERTHEIMER made an abridged English translation of the German version (FigureFigure and Ground). RUBIN had a considerable infl uenceuence onon GestaltGestalt psychology;psychology; KOFFKAKOFFKA wrote a review of RUBIN’s book in 1922, and KOFFKA devoted a whole chapter to the fi gure-ground phenomenon in hisPrinciples of Gestalt Psychology (1935) . The comparison between RUBIN and EHRENFELS will also illustrate the dif- ference between the theoretical or armchair psychology practised at the end of the 19th-century (by EHRENFELS) and the experimental psychology practised at the be- ginning of the 20th-century (by RUBIN).
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of National Diversity Wolfgang Grassl and Barry Smith
    The Politics of National Diversity Wolfgang Grassl and Barry Smith It is reported that Saint Stephen, first Apostoli~ King of more strictly political sort (allegiances to the State, lor Hungary, had advised his son Emmerich that he·should example, or to the Crown). The culture and morality of not spare to invite foreigners into the Kingdom. His Great Britain have moreover been shaped as much by grounds were that 'unius linguae uniusque morjs regnum supranational allegiances - to Western or Protestant imbecile etfragile est': a kingdom with but one language and Christe·ndom, to the British Empire, to the C0I1111}0\1- one custom is weak and fragile. This remark is, one notes, wealth of English-speaking peoples - as by political at odds with much recent conservative philosophical allegiances in the narrower sense. theorising. For the latter has tended to stress the virtues Unfortunately the British imperial experience pro­ of social and institutional homogeneity - the virtues of duced little in the way of positive philosophical theoris­ the nation state as classically conceived. The present ing on its own behalf: Hence, if we are to find a essay challenges that kind of conservatism. framework which might be used to help us cope with or National conservatism can be contested, it seems, make sense of the internal multi- national dynastic con­ from two complementary perspectives. The first would stitution of present-day British society, we shall have to look as it were beneath the level of the state or nation, to look elsewhere. Now one very clear historical example of social entities and forms of social organisation con­ a supranational state incorporating a multiplicity of stituted by individuals as agents in the market or as racial, linguistic and religious groupings is of course the membra voluntativa of corporate associations of various Danube Monarchy of Austria-Hungary, a response to sorts.
    [Show full text]