<<

15 March 2005

Use of Articles in the Pachyonychia Congenita Bibliography

The articles in the PC Bibliography may be restricted by copyright laws. These have been made available to you by PC Project for the exclusive use in teaching, scholar- ship or research regarding Pachyonychia Congenita.

To the best of our understanding, in supplying this material to you we have followed the guidelines of Sec 107 regarding fair use of copyright materials. That section reads as follows:

Sec. 107. - Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include - (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

We hope that making available the relevant information on Pachyonychia Congenita will be a means of furthering research to find effective therapies and a cure for PC.

2386 East Heritage Way, Suite B, Salt Lake City, Utah 84109 USA Phone +1-877-628-7300 • Email—[email protected] www.pachyonychia.org commentary See related article on pg 425

presentations in members of the same Mutations in a 6 Isomer (K6c) family, arguing for modulation of the phenotype by an individual’s genetic Cause a Type of Focal background.

Palmoplantar Keratoderma How many keratin genes? Paul E. Bowden1 It is well established that keratin inter- mediate filament are essential Twenty years have elapsed since keratin mutations were linked to cutaneous components of the cytoskeleton of all genodermatoses, and we now know that they cause 40 different genetic dis- mammalian epithelial cells. They form orders. In this issue, Wilson et al. have identified KRT6C mutations in patients two large multigene families at sepa- with focal palmoplantar keratoderma (FPPK), but debate concerning overlap- rate chromosomal loci, with all type II ping phenotypes between FPPK and pachyonychia congenita (PC) will con- keratin genes and a single type I gene tinue because only one family has nail involvement. Furthermore, screening of (encoding K18) located at 12q11–q13 control DNA samples identified 3 in 335 individuals (1%) who had a mutation and the remaining type I keratin genes (K6c p.Asn172del), but the phenotype was not ascertained. However, this raises at 17q11–q21. are obligate the question as to whether individuals with sensitive feet bear specific KRT6C heteropolymers, with filament assem- mutations and whether a general population screen should be considered. bly requiring a combination of type I Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2010) 130, 336–338. doi:10.1038/jid.2009.395 and type II proteins. They were origi- nally defined by their biochemical properties (Moll et al., 1982; Bowden et al., 1987)—the 11 type I keratins Keratin genodermatoses: sufficient to exert a dominant nega- (K9–K19) were smaller (40–65 kDa) 20 years down the road tive effect over the normal allele in the and more acidic (pI 4.5–6.0) than the It has been two decades since it was majority of cases, providing an expla- 8 (K1–K8) type II keratins (50–70 kDa, established that truncation of small nation for the autosomal dominant pI 6.5–8.5). Recent bioinformatics specific regions of a keratin nature of most keratin-based geno­ based on the human genome project would severely affect the ability of dermatoses (Irvine and McLean, 1999). sequences has established that there keratin filaments to function normal- Further research established the are 54 functional keratin genes (abbre- ly. Although this affected only one of existence of more than 350 unique viated KRT): 31 epithelial keratins, 15 four genetic alleles involved in basic keratin mutations in 21 keratin genes hair-specific keratins, and 8 inner root filament assembly and only 25% of that were the cause of 40 genoder- sheath keratins (Hesse et al., 2004). the total protein content of the fila- matoses. Many keratin mutations Furthermore, a unified nomenclature ment bore the small alteration, it was were unique, but trends appeared was recently established for all known sufficient to cause filament collapse that established hot spots for muta- keratin intermediate filament genes in cultured (Albers and tion in the genes that coincided with and proteins (Schweizer et al., 2006). Fuchs, 1987). A few years later, experi- sensitive regions of the protein struc- This leaves 33 keratin genes in which ments with transgenic mice provided ture. Thus, alterations in the proximal mutations have not yet been identified the first definitive link between keratin 1A helical amino acid residues (helix and that are not yet associated with structural alterations and cutaneous initiation peptide) and the distal 2B any genetic disorder. genodermatoses (Vassar et al., 1991). helical residues (helix termination Single point mutations in specific peptide) accounted for the majority Complications surrounding keratin genes were then found to be (75%) of the known mutations. Within keratin 6 (K6) causal in patients with two hereditary these regions, however, the sensitivity Initially, two K6 proteins were iden- diseases: epidermolysis bullosa of specific amino acid residues var- tified (K6a and K6b), but evidence simplex, caused by mutations in K5 ied, and mutation of adjacent residues was presented for six isoforms of K6 or K14 (Coulombe et al., 1991), and could lead to significant differences in (Takahashi et al., 1995), each encod- epidermolytic hyperkeratosis, caused disease severity (Liovic et al., 2004). ed by a separate gene (KRT6a–6f). by mutations in K1 or K10 (Rothnagel In addition, evidence from family This was followed by the discovery of et al., 1992). Thus, single heterozygous studies indicated that identical muta- another K6-sized protein in the com- point mutations in one allele were tions could have different phenotypic panion layer (K6hf) and several spe- cific keratins in the inner root sheath, 1Department of Dermatology and Wound Healing, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK termed K6irs. It was known from Correspondence: Paul E. Bowden, Department of Dermatology and Wound Healing, School of Medicine, genodermatoses studies that muta- Cardiff University, Glamorgan House, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK. E-mail: [email protected] tions in K6a and K6b caused different

336 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2010), Volume 130 © 2010 The Society for Investigative Dermatology commentary

phenotypic forms of pachyonychia palmoplantar disorder, hereditary Bowden PE, Stark HJ, Breitkreutz D et al. congenita (PC) and that these were painful callosities (HPC: OMIM (1987) Expression and modification of the probable partners of K16 and %114140), in which some patients keratins during terminal differentiation of mammalian . Curr Topics Dev Biol K17, respectively, but no evidence have lesions on the palms and others 22:35–68 from genetic studies supported the do not (Roth et al., 1978; Baden et Bowden PE, Haley JL, Kansky A et al. (1995) existence of other K6 isoforms. The al., 1984). Close examination of the Mutation of a type II keratin gene (K6a) original six proposed isoforms were clinical photographs in this issue and in pachyonychia congenita. Nat Genet eventually reduced to three (K6a, those previously published for HPC 10:363–5 K6b, and K6c) encoded by three func- reveals a close similarity. In addition, Coulombe PA, Hutton ME, Letai A et al. (1991) Point mutations in human keratin genes of tional isogenes (KRT6A, KRT6B, and preliminary data from two other HPC epidermolysis bullosa simplex patients: KRT6C), based on sequence informa- families with an identical phenotypic genetic and functional analyses. Cell tion from the human genome project presentation confirm the ability of 66:1301–11 and studies of the chromosomal locus KRT6C mutations to cause pathology Easter TE, Ruge F, Bowden PE (2009). Hereditary (Rogers et al., 2005). Furthermore, to (Easter et al., 2009.). painful callosities, a form of palmar-plantar keratoderma, are caused by dominant avoid confusion, the other K6 pro- negative mutations in the 2B helix of keratin teins of the hair follicle were renamed Palmoplantar keratoderma: K6c. J Invest Dermatol 129:S45 (abstr.) (Schweizer et al., 2006). a phenotypic mixed bag Hesse M, Zimek A, Weber K et al. (2004) Palmoplantar epidermis not only is Comprehensive analysis of keratin gene thicker than the epidermis at other clusters in humans and rodents. Eur J Cell Biol 83:19–26 anatomical sites but also has a more Mutations in the Irvine AD, McLean WH (1999) Human keratin complex pattern of keratin expres- diseases: the increasing spectrum of disease third K6 gene sion; it is an adaptive tissue capable of and subtlety of the phenotype-genotype implicated as causal resisting mechanical trauma (Bowden correlation. Br J Dermatol 140:815–28 in focal palmoplantar et al., 1987; Swensson et al., 1998). Liovic M, Bowden PE, Marks R et al. (2004) Pathology of the skin at this loca- A mutation (N177S) in the structurally | conserved helix initiation peptide motif of keratoderma. tion produces excessive thickening, keratin 5 causes a mild EBS phenotype. Exp blistering, and cell fragility, typical Dermatol 13:332–4 manifestations of a large group of McLean WHI, Rugg EL, Lunny DP et al. (1995) Mutations in KRT6C: geno­dermatoses collectively known Keratin 16 and keratin 17 mutations cause another keratin gene nailed as PPKs. The hyperkeratotic pheno- pachyonychia congenital. Nat Genet In this issue, Wilson et al. implicate type can be focal, striate, diffuse, or 9:273–8 mutations in the third functional K6 punctuate, and this can be the only Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL et al. (1982) The catalogue of human : gene (KRT6C) as causal in focal pal- pathology in a given family or part of a patterns of expression in normal epithelia, moplantar keratoderma (FPPK). These complex syndrome. The genetic cause tumours, and cultured cells. Cell 31:11–24 investigators have examined three has been elucidated for several of the Rogers MA, Edler L, Winter H et al. (2005) FPPK families (two four-generation PPKs; not only keratin gene mutations Characterization of new members of the families and a two-generation family) but also a wide range of other genes human type II keratin gene family and a general evaluation of the keratin gene and found a remarkably consistent may be involved. Many of the pheno- domain on 12q13.13. J Invest phenotype with mainly plantar hyper- typic differences are minor or subtle, Dermatol 124:536–44 keratosis and blistering. There appears and isolating them into a group with Roth W, Penneys NS, Fawcett N (1978) to be little if any palm involvement, a single genetic cause can be difficult. Hereditary painful callosities. Arch but some minor nail changes were However, in the case of K6c muta- Dermatol 114:591–2 found in one family, suggesting a pos- tions, the phenotype appears to be Rothnagel JA, Dominey AM, Dempsey LD et al. (1992) Mutations in the rod domains sible phenotypic overlap with PC. This quite distinct. Perhaps more of these of keratins 1 and 10 in epidermolytic nail disease has two major phenotypic cases will come to light over the next hyperkeratosis. Science 257:1128–30 variants: PC-1 is caused by muta- few years, allowing a larger number of Schweizer J, Bowden PE, Coulombe PA et al. tions in KRT6A or KRT16 (Bowden K6c mutations to be identified. (2006) New consensus nomenclature for et al., 1995; McLean et al., 1995), mammalian keratins. J Cell Biol 174:169–74 whereas PC-2 is caused by mutations CONFLICT OF INTEREST Smith FJD, Jonkman MF, van Goor H et al. in KRT6B or KRT17 (PC-2: McLean et The author states no conflict of interest. (1998) A mutation in human keratin K6b produces a phenocopy of the K17 disorder al., 1995; Smith et al., 1998). Patients pachyonychia congenital type 2. Hum Mol with focal nonepidermolytic palmo- References Genet 7:1143–8 plantar keratoderma (PPK; FNEPPK: Albers K, Fuchs E (1987) The expression of mutant Smith FJD, Fisher MP, Healy E et al. (2000) OMIM #613000) have been found to epidermal keratin cDNAs transfected in simple Novel keratin 16 mutations and protein bear mutations in KRT16 (Smith et al., epithelial and squamous cell carcinoma lines. expression studies in pachyonychia J Cell Biol 105:791–806 congenital type 1 and focal palmoplantar 2000), again representing a pheno­ Baden HP, Bronstein BR, Rand RE (1984) Hereditary keratoderma. Exp Dermatol 9:170–7 typic overlap with PC-1. The FPPK callosities with blisters: report of a family and Swensson O, Langbein L, McMillan JR et al. phenotype also resembles another review. J Am Acad Dermatol 11:409–15 (1998) Specialised keratin expression

www.jidonline.org 337 commentary

pattern in human ridged skin as an Vassar R, Coulombe PA, Degenstein L et al. (1991) localization for CTGF, TGF-β, and adaptation to high physical stress. Br J Mutant keratin expression in transgenic mice type I procollagen-α1, as well as Dermatol 139:767–75 causes marked abnormalities resembling a human genetic skin disease. Cell 64:365–80 CTGF’s effects on TGF-β signaling. Takahashi K, Paladini RD, Coulombe PA (1995) Using samples of young (21–30 years Cloning and characterization of multiple Wilson NJ, Messenger AG, Leachman SA et al. human genes and cDNAs encoding highly (2010) Keratin K6c mutations cause focal of age) and aged (80 or more years related type 2 keratin 6 isoforms. J Biol palmoplantar keratoderma. J Invest Dermatol of age) but otherwise normal human Chem 270:18581–92 130:425–9 skin, and laser-capture microdissect- ed cells, the authors show that TGF-β and CTGF are normally expressed and produced in skin and skin . See related article on pg 415 Comparing samples from young and aged subjects, Quan et al. found that Could Aging Human Skin Use a in aged skin and fibroblasts, TGF-β, CTGF, and type I procollagen mRNA Growth Factor and protein levels were coordinately reduced. Using transfected normal human dermal fibroblasts, knock- Boost to Increase Content? down of CTGF was associated with Noelynn Oliver1, Mark Sternlicht1, Karin Gerritsen2 decreased type I procollagen promoter and Roel Goldschmeding1,2 activity (COL1A2), mRNA, and pro- tein content, whereas overexpression The roles of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and transforming growth of V5-tagged human CTGF increased factor-β (TGF-β), both well-known collagen production stimulators, were the same readouts. Three approaches examined in skin aging. Aged skin and fibroblasts exhibited a coordinate to block signaling due to endogenous decrease in CTGF, TGF-β, and type I procollagen expression and content. CTGF TGF-β were used to assess molecular knockdown and TGF-β blockade in normal dermal fibroblasts reduced procol- mechanisms by which CTGF modu- lagen expression, whereas overexpressing CTGF increased procollagen by a lates type I procollagen: (i) a specific TGF-β/Smad signaling–dependent mechanism without involving Smad2/3. TGF-βRI kinase inhibitor SB431542, Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2010) 130, 338–341. doi:10.1038/jid.2009.331 (ii) Smad4 knockdown, and (iii) over- expression of inhibitory Smad7. All approaches completely blocked the Background reported disease associations (Leask CTGF-mediated increase in type I pro- is a major struc- et al., 2009; Cicha et al., 2009), collagen expression and production, tural protein in human skin and, by potential macromolecular interac- indicating that TGF-β receptor and mass, the most abundant protein in tions, and complex gene regulation Smad signaling are required. However, the human body. The association of that also involves disease-associated no effects of CTGF knockdown or over- age-dependent collagen loss with processes and factors (Figure 1). The expression were observed on TGF-β- thinning and fragility of elderly skin evolution of a purely pathogenic fac- dependent Smad2/3 phosphorylation has long been appreciated, yet the tor is unlikely without invoking an or Smad3 transcriptional activity. underlying mechanisms are not well extreme selfish-gene concept, and the On the basis of these findings, the understood. A recent study (Quan results of Quan et al., which address authors conclude that endogenous et al., 2010, this issue) suggests that CTGF function in normal young and production of both TGF-β and CTGF diminished expression of connective aging skin, provide an alternative in human dermal fibroblasts normally tissue growth factor (CTGF), together view of CTGF’s physiological signifi- acts to modulate type I procollagen with diminished transforming growth cance in tissue . expression in skin. They propose that factor (TGF)-β/Smad signaling, is this involves a TGF-β/Smad/CTGF responsible for this progressive loss of CTGF in aging skin: new findings axis that is operated by interdepen- dermal collagen. CTGF is a secreted, By means of associative and mecha- dent, yet distinct, mechanisms to matri­cellular protein, and, like that nistic in vivo and in vitro studies, regulate type I procollagen produc- of other such proteins, its function is Quan et al. (2010) probe the impor- tion. Decreased expression of TGF-β thought to be regulatory, not struc- tance of CTGF and TGF-β for col- and CTGF by aged skin fibroblasts is tural. CTGF is generally considered a lagen loss in aging skin. They report proposed to underlie age-associated pathogenic factor because of its many findings on expression, content, and downregulation of the TGF-β/Smad/ CTGF axis, thereby leading to reduced type I procollagen expression. These 1Therapeutics Research, FibroGen, Inc., San Francisco, California, USA and 2Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands results suggest beneficial effects of Correspondence: Noelynn Oliver, FibroGen, Inc., 409 Illinois Street, San Francisco, California 94080, USA. CTGF and provide novel insight into E-mail: [email protected] the mechanisms of skin aging.

338 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2010), Volume 130