DOCSLIB.ORG

Auditory Perceptual Load: a Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Auditory Perceptual Load: a Review Hearing Research xxx (2017) 1e9 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Hearing Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/heares Review article Auditory perceptual load: A review * Sandra Murphy a, , Charles Spence b, Polly Dalton a a Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, United Kingdom b Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: Selective attention is a crucial mechanism in everyday life, allowing us to focus on a portion of incoming Received 23 September 2016 sensory information at the expense of other less relevant stimuli. The circumstances under which Received in revised form irrelevant stimuli are successfully ignored have been a topic of scientific interest for several decades now. 21 December 2016 Over the last 20 years, the perceptual load theory (e.g. Lavie, 1995) has provided one robust framework Accepted 5 February 2017 for understanding these effects within the visual modality. The suggestion is that successful selection Available online xxx depends on the perceptual demands imposed by the task-relevant information. However, less research has addressed the question of whether the same principles hold in audition and, to date, the existing Keywords: Auditory selective attention literature provides a mixed picture. Here, we review the evidence for and against the applicability of Perceptual load perceptual load theory in hearing, concluding that this question still awaits resolution. Distractor processing © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Contents 1. Introduction . ................................................. 00 2. Principles of perceptual load from the visual domain . .................................... 00 2.1. Defining perceptual load . ....................... 00 2.1.1. The number of items in the display . ....................... 00 2.1.2. The level of similarity between targets and non-targets . ....................... 00 2.1.3. The number of perceptual operations required by the task . ....................... 00 2.2. Measuring irrelevant distractor processing . ....................... 00 2.2.1. Response competition . ....................... 00 2.2.2. Awareness report . ....................... 00 2.2.3. Neuroimaging . ....................... 00 2.2.4. EEG ......................................................................................... ....................... 00 3. Auditory selective attention and perceptual load . .................................... 00 3.1. Dichotic listening . ....................... 00 3.2. Studies manipulating auditory perceptual load . ....................... 00 3.2.1. The number of items in the display . ....................... 00 3.2.2. The level of similarity between targets and non-targets . ....................... 00 3.2.3. The number of perceptual operations required by the task . ....................... 00 3.2.4. Alternative auditory load manipulations . ....................... 00 4. Summary and conclusions . ................................................. 00 Acknowledgements . ....................... 00 References................................................................. ................................ ....................... 00 1. Introduction * Corresponding author. Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, TW20 0EX, United Kingdom. In a world that is rich with sensory information, it is impossible E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Murphy). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.005 0378-5955/© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please cite this article in press as: Murphy, S., et al., Auditory perceptual load: A review, Hearing Research (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.heares.2017.02.005 2 S. Murphy et al. / Hearing Research xxx (2017) 1e9 to perceive everything around us at any given time. Selective spatial senses. Despite some recent interest in this question within attention is thus a crucial mechanism because it allows us to focus the tactile domain (Adler et al., 2009; see Gallace and Spence, 2014; on relevant information and give less priority to irrelevant, for a review) and in crossmodal contexts (e.g. Macdonald and Lavie, potentially distracting information (see, for example, Awh et al., 2011; Murphy and Dalton, 2016; Otten et al., 2000; Raveh and Lavie, 2012; Chun et al., 2011; Dalton and Hughes, 2014; for recent re- 2015; Rees et al., 2001; Tellinghuisen et al., 2016; Tellinghuisen and views). A widely-researched topic within the area of selective Nowak, 2003), the current review will focus on audition. Although attention concerns the question of what determines whether or not Lavie and Tsal (1994) listed some examples of potential effects of distracting information can be successfully ignored. Why is it auditory perceptual load in their seminal consideration of the way sometimes near-impossible to ignore the radio playing in the in which earlier findings could be explained within the framework background, for instance, whereas in other situations we miss that of perceptual load, this question has subsequently received far less potentially important announcement at the train station? One attention than within the visual domain. Nevertheless, given that prominent approach over the last 20 years has come from hearing is often considered to act as an ‘early warning system’ (e.g. perceptual load theory (Lavie and Tsal, 1994; Lavie, 1995). The Dalton and Lavie, 2004; Spence and Driver, 1994; Spence and theory promises to explain this paradox by proposing that the main Santangelo, 2009) e continually scanning the environment in all determinant of whether or not irrelevant information can be suc- directions while the other senses focus on more restricted areas of cessfully ignored depends on the perceptual load (i.e. demands) of space e one might predict that mechanisms of distractor process- the relevant task. One of the critical aspects of the theory is that it ing would operate differently in audition than in vision. Indeed, proposes that our perceptual system has limited processing ca- from this evolutionary perspective, the processing of seemingly- pacity, and that it is beyond our volitional control as to how much irrelevant sounds is likely to have been beneficial for our survival of that capacity will be engaged at any given time. Instead, all of the (e.g. in allowing us to detect the sounds of predators approaching available information is automatically processed until an in- from behind). Furthermore, visual perceptual load has also been dividual's perceptual capacity is exhausted. The role of volitional suggested to alter the spatial focus of attention (Caparos and control is to influence what information gets prioritised for further Linnell, 2010), demonstrating a more narrow focus of resources as processing, thus allowing us to focus on relevant stimuli at the perceptual demands increase. In light of the early warning system expense of those that may be currently less relevant to us. account, it seems perhaps unlikely that an equivalent role of Taken together, this implies that the perceptual demand of the perceptual load would exist in hearing. Indeed, in recent years, relevant task that we are engaged with determines our success in mixed findings have been reported concerning the applicability of ignoring irrelevant information. If the relevant task is perceptually perceptual load theory to the auditory domain, creating the need simple (low perceptual load), only a small portion of our perceptual for a more thorough examination of auditory selective attention capacity will be allocated to it, with the remainder automatically and its underlying neural mechanisms. used to process surrounding irrelevant information. On the other hand, if the relevant task is perceptually demanding (high 2. Principles of perceptual load from the visual domain perceptual load), all, or most, of our processing capacity will be exhausted by the task and hence little or no capacity will remain We will begin by outlining the principles of perceptual load available to process any irrelevant information. The consequences theory as defined within the visual modality. This outline will then are thus that irrelevant distractor processing occurs to a much help structure the evidence from the auditory domain to help greater degree when the current goals involve relevant tasks of low assess how these findings fit within the existing framework of vi- (vs. high) perceptual load, simply because the perceptual capacity sual perceptual load. The literature is organised according to the will be spread between the processing of both relevant and irrel- particular measures and manipulations that have been used. evant stimuli in these contexts. However, it should be noted that we do not intend by this to sug- Although this review will focus solely on claims concerning gest that specific manipulations of perceptual load are computa- perceptual load, it is worth mentioning that load theory also ad- tionally equivalent for vision and audition when it comes to the dresses the influence of working memory (WM) load (e.g. de perceptual demands that they might impose. Indeed, the funda- Fockert et al., 2001; Lavie et al., 2004). The proposal is that suc- mental differences between the two modalities in terms of how cessful
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of Perceptual Load in Visual Awareness
    BRAIN RESEARCH 1080 (2006) 91– 100 available at www.sciencedirect.com www.elsevier.com/locate/brainres Research Report The role of perceptual load in visual awareness Nilli Lavie⁎ Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Does awareness depend on attention? This is a fundamental issue for understanding the Accepted 6 October 2005 relationship of attention and awareness, yet previous research provided mixed results. Available online 18 January 2006 Here, I describe new research that shows that the effects of attention on awareness depend on the level of perceptual load in the attended task. Awareness reports in both Keywords: the inattentional blindness and change blindness paradigms were found to depend on the Attention extent to which an attended primary task loads attention. Neuroimaging results revealed Awareness the involvement of frontoparietal attention network in awareness and transcranial Load magnetic stimulation experiments confirmed a causal role for frontoparietal activity in Change blindness awareness. These results clarify the role of attention and associated frontoparietal Inattentional blindness activity in visual awareness within the framework of load theory of attention. Distracter © 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V. Neuroimaging TMS 1. Introduction from the task-relevant processing spills over involuntarily, resulting in the perception of irrelevant stimuli (late selection). Would focusing attention on a current task prevent intrusions
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Specificity, but Not Perceptual Load, Affects Susceptibility to Misleading Information
    Memory specificity, but not perceptual load, affects susceptibility to misleading information Francesca R. Farina1,2,* & Ciara M. Greene1 1School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Ireland. 2Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Note: This paper has not yet been peer-reviewed. Please contact the authors before citing. Correspondence may be sent to Francesca Farina, Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Email: [email protected] 1 Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the role of perceptual load in eyewitness memory accuracy and susceptibility to misinformation at immediate and delayed recall. Despite its relevance to real-world situations, previous research in this area is limited. A secondary aim was to establish whether trait-based memory specificity can protect against susceptibility to misinformation. Participants (n=264) viewed a 1-minute video depicting a crime and completed a memory questionnaire immediately afterwards and one week later. Memory specificity was measured via an online version of the Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT). We found a strong misinformation effect, but no effect of perceptual load on memory accuracy or suggestibility at either timepoint. Memory specificity was a significant predictor of accuracy for both neutrally phrased and leading questions, though the effect was weaker after a one-week delay. Results suggest that specific autobiographical memory, but not perceptual load, enhances eyewitness memory and protects against misinformation. Keywords Perceptual load; memory specificity; eyewitness; misinformation. 2 General Audience Summary The misinformation effect is a memory impairment for a past event that occurs when a person is presented with leading information. Leading information can distort the original details of a memory and produce false memories.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years of Load Theory – Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go Next?
    Twenty Years of Load Theory – Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go Next? Gillian Murphy 1, John A. Groeger 2 & Ciara M. Greene 3 1University College Cork, Ireland, 2University of Hull, United Kingdom, 3University College Dublin, Ireland. Abstract Selective attention allows us to ignore what is task-irrelevant and focus on what is task- relevant. The cognitive and neural mechanisms which underlie this process is a key topic of investigation in cognitive psychology. One of the more prominent theories of attention is Perceptual Load Theory which suggests that the efficiency of selective attention is dependent on both perceptual and cognitive load. It is now more than 20 years since the proposal of Load Theory and it is timely to evaluate the evidence in support of this influential model. The present article supplements and extends upon previous reviews (Lavie, 2005; 2010) by examining more recent research in what appears to be a rapidly expanding area of research. The article comprises five parts, examining (1) the evidence for the effects of perceptual load on attention, (2) cognitive load, (3) individual differences under load, (4) alternative theories & criticisms and (5) the future of Load Theory. We argue that the key next step for Load Theory is the application of the model to real world tasks. The potential benefits of applied attention research are numerous and there is tentative evidence that applied research would provide strong support for the theory itself as well as real world benefits in activities where attention is crucial, such as driving and education. Keywords Selective Attention : Perception : Perceptual Load : Load Theory : Distraction : Visual Attention Corresponding Author: Gillian Murphy School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, North Mall, Cork.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditory Selective Attention: an Introduction and Evidence for Distinct Facilitation and Inhibition Mechanisms
    Aus dem Epilepsiezentrum Erlangen Leiter: Prof. Dr. med. Hermann Stefan der Neurologischen Klinik mit Poliklinik der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Direktor: Prof. Dr. med. Stefan Schwab Durchgeführt im Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute der University of California, Berkeley, USA Direktor: Robert T. Knight, M.D. Betreuer: Aurélie Bidet-Caulet, Ph.D. Auditory Selective Attention: an introduction and evidence for distinct facilitation and inhibition mechanisms Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Medizinischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg vorgelegt von Constanze Elisabeth Anna Mikyska aus München Gedruckt mit Erlaubnis der Medizinischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Dekan: Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h.c. J. Schüttler Referent: Prof. Dr. med. H. Stefan Korreferent: Prof. Dr. med. Dipl.-Psych. Ch. Lang Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29. Februar 2012 To my family Table of contents 1 Summary 1 1.1 Summary 1 1.2 Zusammenfassung 3 2 Introduction 5 2.1 Auditory system: anatomy and function 5 2.1.1 Ear 5 2.1.2 Sub-cortical auditory relays 10 2.1.3 Auditory cortex 13 2.2 Investigation of auditory perception and processing 14 2.2.1 Psychophysics – psychoacoustics 15 2.2.2 Brain activity – electroencephalography (EEG) 17 2.2.2.1 Introduction and history 17 2.2.2.2 Physiological fundamentals 17 2.2.2.3 Recording 22 2.2.2.4 Classification of frequency 25 2.2.2.5 Artifacts 27 2.2.2.6 Data analysis: preprocessing and event-related potentials (ERP) 30 2.2.2.7
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Attention and Perceptual Load in Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Selective Attention and Perceptual Load in Autism Spectrum Disorder Anna Remington University College London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2009 1 Declaration I, Anna Remington confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. A Remington 2 Abstract This thesis examines selective attention in young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Existing literature regarding this issue is mixed; some research suggesting an overly-focused attentional style (Rincover & Ducharme, 1987) while others highlight an abnormally broad attentional lens (Burack, 1994). The research presented here has, for the first time, examined selective attention in individuals with ASD using a theoretically-led approach based on Lavie’s Load Theory of attention and cognitive control (Lavie et al., 2004). Load theory states that the perceptual load (amount of potentially task relevant information) of a task affects selective attention. This theory may explain the equivocal findings in the current data on selective attention and ASD. Using behavioural measures, the pattern of selective attention under various levels of load was explored in individuals with ASD and matched controls. The results provide evidence of increased perceptual capacity in ASD. This means that, at any one time, individuals with ASD may be able to process more information from the visual environment. This increase in capacity was evident on tasks of both unconscious and conscious perception. In light of the social deficits observed in the condition, the work in this thesis also explored selective attention in the presence of social distractor stimuli.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptual Load and Driving Duration Moderate Mind Wandering. (Under the Direction of Dr
    ABSTRACT GEDEN, MICHAEL ALEXANDER. Two-track Mind: Perceptual Load and Driving Duration Moderate Mind Wandering. (Under the direction of Dr. Jing Feng). A large portion of our day-to-day lives is spent with our heads in the clouds mind wandering. While often innocuous, there is mounting evidence that mind wandering may be dangerous and common during driving; however, little is known about where it may be particularly prevalent or dangerous. This dissertation explores two common environmental variables, perceptual load and driving duration, and their relationship with mind wandering rate and cost. In experiment I participants drove in two scenarios of differential perceptual loads, a simple rural drive with no extraneous objects and a more visually complex rural drive. Experiment II focused on the influence of an extended driving duration on mind wandering and its impact on vehicular control. Experiment III increased the perceptual load disparity by comparing a busy rural road to an urban drive and looked at the impact on cued/un-cued braking events in order to explore where mind wandering may be particularly dangerous. Increased perceptual load was found to be associated with decreased rates of mind wandering, and longer driving durations with an asymptotic rise in the rate of mind wandering. A number of driving detriments were found in association with mind wandering, including more variable driving speed, smaller headway distance, and a decreased safety margin during braking events. This study shows that environmental factors are critical in understanding mind wandering prevalence and cost. Improving understanding of the relationship of mind wandering and driving will help the future development of driver alert systems and their effective deployment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Modal Selective Attention and Perceptual Load in Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Cross-modal Selective Attention and Perceptual Load in Autism Spectrum Disorder Julian Tillmann University College London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2015 1 Declaration I, Julian Tillmann confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. J. Tillmann 2 Abstract This thesis investigated cross-modal selective attention in children and adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) individuals using the Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control (Lavie, 1995). Perceptual load theory states that perception of irrelevant stimuli depends on the perceptual load of the task (the amount of task relevant information). At low levels of perceptual load, when finite perceptual capacity is not reached, remaining resources ‘spill over’ and irrelevant stimuli are automatically processed; when perceptual load exhausts capacity, irrelevant stimuli are no longer processed. In ASD, there is some evidence that on visual attention tasks, individuals with ASD continue to process visual information at higher levels of perceptual load than controls, indicative of an increased perceptual capacity (Remington, Swettenham, & Lavie, 2012; Remington, Swettenham, Campbell, & Coleman, 2009; Swettenham, Remington, Murphy, Feuerstein, Grim, & Lavie, 2014). This thesis tested novel predictions derived from these findings for contexts of cross-modal selective attention. Using behavioural measures, the extent to which participants were able to attend to auditory information was examined as a function of the perceptual demands of a visual task. It was shown that individuals with ASD continued to report awareness of auditory information at higher levels of visual perceptual load than matched typically developing individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Stimulus Recognition Occurs Under High Perceptual Load: Evidence from Correlated Flankers
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: © 2016 American Psychological Association Human Perception and Performance 0096-1523/16/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000278 2016, Vol. 42, No. 12, 2077–2083 Stimulus Recognition Occurs Under High Perceptual Load: Evidence From Correlated Flankers Joshua D. Cosman J. Toby Mordkoff and Shaun P. Vecera Vanderbilt University University of Iowa A dominant account of selective attention, perceptual load theory, proposes that when attentional resources are exhausted, task-irrelevant information receives little attention and goes unrecognized. However, the flanker effect—typically used to assay stimulus identification—requires an arbitrary mapping between a stimulus and a response. We looked for failures of flanker identification by using a more-sensitive measure that does not require arbitrary stimulus–response mappings: the correlated flankers effect. We found that flanking items that were task-irrelevant but that correlated with target identity produced a correlated flanker effect. Participants were faster on trials in which the irrelevant flanker had previously correlated with the target than when it did not. Of importance, this correlated flanker effect appeared regardless of perceptual load, occurring even in high-load displays that should have abolished flanker identification. Findings from a standard flanker task replicated the basic percep- tual load effect, with flankers not affecting response times under high perceptual load. Our results indicate that task-irrelevant information can be processed to a high level (identification), even under high perceptual load. This challenges a strong account of high perceptual load effects that hypothesizes complete failures of stimulus identification under high perceptual load. Keywords: perceptual load, selective attention, visual awareness, consciousness A long-standing issue in the study of attention is the locus of Eriksen, 1974; C.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Stimulus Salience and Perceptual Load
    INVESTIGATING STIMULUS SALIENCE AND PERCEPTUAL LOAD INTERACTION USING A HYBRID VISUAL-SEARCH FLANKER TASK A Mini-dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MA Research Psychology In the Department of Psychology at the UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA FACULTY OF HUMANITIES By Gerrit Stefanus de Jager Supervisor: Ms Clare Schür Co-supervisor: Prof David Maree i Acknowledgments I would like to thank the following people (and cats): My wife for her support and for loving me despite the fact that I drive her crazy My cats Token, Botter, Kenny and Heidi for making me the world’s fastest “Control + s” presser. I’ll be on “Ripley’s Believe it or Not” one day thanks to them My parents for supporting my venture to become a psychologist even if it’s not a “real” job like being an accountant or a lawyer Clare Schür for acting as a critical soundboard for my silly ideas and always being supportive… even when I’m obviously wrong Prof David Maree for making me feel like I’m Jon Snow, and inspiring me to not be Jon Snow ii DECLARATION I, Gerrit Stefanus de Jager, hereby declare that this dissertation, to be submitted to the University of Pretoria for the degree Master in Research Psychology, is my own original work and has not been submitted to this University or any other tertiary institution for any degree. Signed: _______________________ This _______ day of ________ 2015 iii Summary The perceptual load theory of selective attention proposed by Tsal and Lavie (1994) and Lavie (1995) argues that selective attention is predominantly necessitated by perceptual capacity limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Target and Distractor Processing and the Influence of Load on the Allocation of Attention to Task-Irrelevant
    1 Target and distractor processing and the influence of load on the allocation of attention to task-irrelevant threat Bretherton, P.M.1, Eysenck, M.W.1, Richards, A.2, Holmes, A1. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, UK 2. Department of Psychological Science, Birkbeck, University of London, UK Running head Load influence on attention to task-irrelevant threat Corresponding Author: Amanda Holmes, PhD ([email protected]) Address: University of Roehampton Holybourne Avenue London SW15 4JD Tel: ++44 (0)208 392 3784 Words: 12,599 2 Abstract This study investigated the characteristics of two distinct mechanisms of attention – stimulus enhancement and stimulus suppression – using an event-related potential (ERP) approach. Across three experiments, participants viewed sparse visual search arrays containing one target and one distractor. The main results of Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that whereas neural signals for stimuli that are not inherently salient could be directly suppressed without prior attentional enhancement, this was not the case for stimuli with motivational relevance (human faces). Experiment 3 showed that as task difficulty increased, so did the need for suppression of distractor stimuli. It also showed the preferential attentional enhancement of angry over neutral distractor faces, but only under conditions of high task difficulty, suggesting that the effects of distractor valence on attention are greatest when there are fewer available resources for distractor processing. The implications of these findings are considered in relation to contemporary theories of attention. Keywords: Attentional Capture, Suppression, Load, ERP, Threat, NT, PD, ND, N2pc 3 1. Introduction The number of stimuli in our field of view typically exceeds our brain’s perceptual capacity and therefore only stimuli located where attention is focussed may be selectively processed (Desimone & Duncan, 1995; LaBerge, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Context and Perceptual Load on Object
    THE INFLUENCE OF CONTEXT AND PERCEPTUAL LOAD ON OBJECT RECOGNITION by Mohammed F. Islam A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Charles E. Schmidt College of Science In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL August 2019 Copyright 2019 by Mohammed Islam ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my gratitude towards Howard Hock, Sang Wook Hong, Summer Sheremata, and Thomas Sanocki for their guidance and support. I would also like express my deepest thanks to Elan Barenholtz for his continuous advising. iv ABSTRACT Author: Mohammed F. Islam Title: The Influence of Context and Perceptual Load on Object Recognition Institution: Florida Atlantic University Thesis Advisor: Dr. Elan Barenholtz Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Year: 2019 Forster and Lavie (2008) and Lavie, Lin, Zokaei and Thoma (2009) have demonstrated that meaningful stimuli, such as objects, are ignored under conditions of high perceptual load but not low. However, objects are seldom presented without context in the real world. Given that context can reduce the threshold for object recognition (Barenholtz, 2013), is it possible for context to reduce the processing load of objects such that they can be processed under high load? In the first experiment, I attempted to obtain similar findings of the aforementioned studies by replicating their paradigm with photographs of real-world objects. The findings of the experiment suggested that objects can cause distractor interference under high load conditions, but not low load conditions. These findings are opposite of what the perceptual literature suggests (e.g., Lavie, 1995). However, these findings are aligned with a two-stage dilution model of attention in which information is first processed in parallel and then selectively (Wilson, Muroi, and MacLeod, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Attenuated Face Processing During Mind Wandering
    Attenuated Face Processing during Mind Wandering Ekaterina Denkova, Emily G. Brudner, Kristen Zayan, Joseph Dunn, and Amishi P. Jha Abstract ■ Mind wandering (MW) has been recently investigated upright faces (nontargets) and withhold responses to inverted in many studies. It has been suggested that, during MW, pro- faces (targets) and to report intermittently if they were “On cessing of perceptual stimuli is attenuated in favor of internal task” or “Off task.” Behavioral analyses revealed greater intrain- thoughts, a phenomenon referred to as perceptual decoupling. dividual coefficient of variation for nontarget faces preceding Perceptual decoupling has been investigated in ERP studies, Off task versus On task. ERP analyses focused primarily on which have used relatively simple perceptual stimuli, yet it the N170 component associated with face processing but also remains unclear if MW can impact the perceptual processing included the P1 and P3 components. The results revealed atten- of complex stimuli with real-world relevance. Here, we investi- uated amplitudes to nontarget faces preceding Off task versus gated the impact of MW on behavioral and neural responses to On task for the N170, but not for the P3 or P1. These findings faces. Thirty-six participants completed a novel sustained atten- suggest decoupled visual processing of faces during MW, which tion to response task with faces. They were asked to respond to has implications for social neuroscience research. ■ INTRODUCTION Attenuated neural processing of external stimuli during The topic of mind wandering (MW) has garnered im- MW has been primarily evidenced using the ERP method mense interest in cognitive psychology and neuroscience (Baird et al., 2014; Kam, Nagamatsu, & Handy, 2014; Kam in the last 15 years (Callard, Smallwood, Golchert, & et al., 2011; Smallwood et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]