DOCSLIB.ORG

62. French, English and Latin Names of Insects, Diseases and Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
62. French, English and Latin Names of Insects, Diseases and Plants Wild Blueberry in a Context of Production Guide... Sustainable Development 62. French, English and Latin Names of Insects, Diseases and Plants Encountered in Blueberry Fields This list presents the species encountered most often in Québec blueberry fi elds. It is by no means exhaustive. Certain species, fl agged by a number indicating the corresponding leafl et, have been discussed at length because they represent a new, particular or signifi cant problem in blueberry production. For a more complete list, or for details on species identifi cation, we suggest that you consult an identifi cation guide. INSECTS French Name English Name Latin Name AAltiseltise ddee ll’airelle’airelle ((dudu bbleuet)leuet) ((33)33) FFlealea BBeetleeetle AAlticaltica ssylviaylvia AArpenteuserpenteuse dduu bbleuetleuet ((34)34) BBlueberrylueberry SSpanwormpanworm MMacariaacaria aandersonindersoni aandersonindersoni Arpenteuse caténaire Chainspotted, Chain-dotted Geometer Cingilia catenaria Thrips du bleuet Blueberry Thrips Catinathrips kainos CCercopeercope ddee ll’airelle’airelle ((36)36) HHeatheath SSpittlepittle BBugug CClastopteralastoptera saintcyrisaintcyri Chenille à houppes blanches Whitemarked Tussock Moth Orgya leucostigma Chrysomèle porte-case du bleuet Blueberry Case Beetle Neochlamisus cribripennis Galéruque de l’airelle Blueberry Leaf Beetle Tricholochmaea vaccinii Légionnaire noire Black Army Cutworm Actebia fennica MMoucheouche dduu bbleuetleuet ((dede ll’airelle)’airelle) ((35)35) BBlueberrylueberry MMaggot,aggot, BBlueberrylueberry FFruitruit FFlyly RRhagoletishagoletis mendaxmendax Tenthrède du bleuet Blueberry Sawfl y Neopareophora litura Thrips du bleuet Blueberry Thrips Frankliniella vaccinii Tisseuse du bleuet (de l’airelle) Blueberry Leaftier, Leaf Roller Croesia curvalana Tordeuse du bleuet (lieuse à bandes rouges) Red-Stripped Fireworm Aroga trialbamaculella 1 62. French, English and Latin Names of Insects, Diseases and Plants Encountered in Blueberry Fields DISEASES French Name English Name Latin Name (asexual form/sexual form) BBlanclanc ((oïdium)oïdium) ((40)40) PPowderyowdery MildewMildew MMicrosphaeraicrosphaera ppenicillataenicillata vvacciniiaccinii Brûlure des rameaux Twig Blight Aureobasidium pullulans Chancre godronien Godronia Canker Fusicocum putrefacien / Godronia cassandrae Chancre phomopsien Phomopsis Canker Phomopsis vaccinii / Diaporthe vaccinii Moisissure grise Botrytis Blight, Blossom, Twig Botrytis cinerea / Botryotina fuckeliana PPourritureourriture ssclérotiqueclérotique ((37)37) MMummyummy BBerryerry MMoniliniaonilinia vvaccinii-corymbosiaccinii-corymbosi Rouge Red Leaf Exobasidium vaccinii RRouilleouille ((dudu bbleuet,leuet, ddeses ffeuilles,euilles, ddee llaa ppruche)ruche) LLeafeaf RRustust NNaohidemycesaohidemyces vvacciniiaccinii ((PucciniastrumPucciniastrum vvaccinii,accinii, ((39)39) TThekosporahekospora minima)minima) Rouille-balai de sorcière Witches’ Broom Rust Pucciniastrum goeppertianum Tache ramularienne Ramularia Leaf Spot Ramularia effusa TTacheache sseptorienneeptorienne ((38)38) SSeptoriaeptoria LLeafeaf SSpotpot SSeptoriaeptoria sspp.pp. TTacheache vvaldensinéennealdensinéenne ((41)41) VValdensiniaaldensinia LLeafeaf SSpotpot VValdensiaaldensia hheterodoxaeterodoxa / VValdensiniaaldensinia hheterodoxaeterodoxa PLANTS French Name English Name Latin Name Achillée millefeuille Common Yarrow Achillea millefolium Agrostide scabre (foin fou) Hairgrass, Rough Bentgrass Agrostis scabra Airelle vigne-d’Ida Mountain Cranberry Vaccinium vitis-idaea Amélanchiers - Amelanchier sp. Apocyn à feuille d’androsème Spreading Dogbane Apocynum androsaemifolium Aronia (aronie à fruits noirs) Black Chokeberry Aronia melanocarpa Aulne crispé, aulne rugueux Alder Alnus crispa, Alnus rugosa Bouleau Birch Betula sp. CCarexarex ((46)46) SSedgeedge CCarexarex ssp.p. Cassandre caliculée Leatherleaf Chamaedaphne calyculata Cerisier de Pennsylvanie Fire Cherry Prunus pensylvanica Chénopode blanc (chou gras) Lambsquarter Chenopodium album Chèvrefeuille Honeysuckle Lonicera villosa and canadensis Chiendent Quackgrass, Couch-Grass Agropyron repens Clintonie boréale Bluebead, Yellow Clintonia Clintonia borealis CComptonieomptonie vvoyageuseoyageuse ((43)43) SSweetweet FFernern CComptoniaomptonia pperegrineeregrine Corydale toujours verte Pale Corydalis Corydalis sempervirens Danthonie à épi Poverty Oat Grass, Wild Oat-Grass Danthonia spicata Diereville chèvrefeuille Bush Honeysuckle Diervilla lonicera Épervière Hawkweeds Hieracium sp. Épigée rampante Trailing Arbutus, Mayfl ower Epigaea repens Wild Blueberry Production Guide 2 62. French, English and Latin Names of Insects, Diseases and Plants Encountered in Blueberry Fields French Name English Name Latin Name Épilobe à feuilles étroites Fireweed Epilobium angustifolium Faux houx Mountain-Holly, Wild Holly, Catberry Nemopanthus mucronatus GGranderande ffougèreougère (45)(45) BBrackenracken FFernern PPteridiumteridium aaquilinumquilinum Immortelle Pearly-Everlasting, Life-Everlasting Anaphalis margaritacea Joncs Rush Juncus spp. KKalmiaalmia à ffeuilleseuilles éétroitestroites ((42)42) LLambkill,ambkill, SSheepheep LLaurelaurel KKalmiaalmia aangustifoliangustifolia Laitue du Canada Canada Lettuce Lactuca canadensis Lysimaque terrestre Swamp (Terrestrial) Loosestrife Lysimachia terrestris Maïanthème du Canada Wild Lily-of-the-Valley Maianthemum canadense MMélampyreélampyre llinéaireinéaire ((48)48) CCow-wheatow-wheat MMelampyrumelampyrum llineareineare MMousseousse à cariboucaribou ((49)49) RReindeereindeer LLichensichens CCladinaladina sssp.sp. Onagre bisanuelle Yellow Evening Primrose Oenothera biennis Pâturin Blue Grass Poa spp. Petite oseille Sheep Sorrell, Field Sorrel Rumex acetosella Peuplier faux-tremble Trembling Aspen, Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides Pissenlit Dandelion Taraxacum offi cinale Potentille Cinquefoil Potentilla spp. Prunelle vulgaire Selfheal, Heal-All Prunella vulgaris QQuatre-tempsuatre-temps ((44)44) BBunchberryunchberry DDogwoodogwood CCornusornus canadensiscanadensis Raisin d’ours Bearberry Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Sabot de la vierge Pink Lady’s-Slipper Cypripedium acaule Salsepareille (aralie hispide) Bristly Sarsaparilla Aralia hispida Saule Willow Salix sp. Scirpe Bulrush Scirpus sp. Spirée à larges feuilles Large-Leaved Meadowsweet Spiraea latifolia Thé des bois Wintergreen Gaultheria procumbens Thé du Labrador Labrador Tea Ledum groenlandicum Trèfl e Clover Trifolium spp. Trientale boréale American Starfl ower Trientalis borealis subs. borealis Verge d’or du Canada Canada Goldenrod Solidago canadensis Vergerette du Canada Canada Fleabane Erigeron canadensis Vesce jargeau Tufted Vetch, Cow Vetch Vicia cracca Violette Violet Viola spp. Viorne cassinoïde Whiterod, Wild Raisin, Appalachian Tea Viburnum cassinoides 3 Wild Blueberry Production Guide 62. French, English and Latin Names of Insects, Diseases and Plants Encountered in Blueberry Fields REFERENCES Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 2008. Crop Profi le for Wild Blueberry in Canada. 60 pp. Caruso, F.L. and D.C. Ramsdell. 1995. Compendium of Blueberry and Cranberry Diseases. The American Phytopathological Society. 87 pp. Desjardins, È.-C. and R. Néron. 2010. Guide d’identifi cation des alliés et ennemis du bleuet nain : Insectes, maladies et végétaux. Centre de recherche Les Buissons. Marie-Victorin, Frère. 1995. Flore laurentienne. Third Edition. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal. 1093 pp. Sampson, M.G., K.V. McCully and D.L. Sampson. 1990. Weeds of Eastern Canadian Blueberry Fields. Nova Scotia Agricultural College Bookstore. Truro, Nova Scotia. 229 pp. Entomological Society of Canada. 2006. Common Names Database. Toronto. [Online]. www.esc-sec.ca/ee/index.php/cndb (Page consulted on September 15, 2010). USDA. Plants database. Natural Resources Conservation Service. [Online]. http://plants.usda.gov/index.html (Page consulted on September 15, 2010). Wild Blueberry Network Information Centre. Wild Blueberry Factsheets. Wild Blueberry Producers’ Association of Nova Scotia, Nova Scotia Blueberry Institute and Department of Agriculture and Marketing. [Online]. http://nsac.ca/wildblue/facts/ (Page consulted on September 15, 2010). Yarborough, D. and F. Dummond. 2008. A pocket guide to IPM scouting in Wild Blueberries. The University of Maine. Cooperative Extension. 73 pp. PROJECT COORDINATION PUBLISHING Sophie Gagnon, Agronomist, Project Management Chantale Ferland, M.Sc., Publishing Project Offi cer, CRAAQ, Coordinator, Agrinova, Alma Québec Lyne Lauzon, Publications Coordinator, CRAAQ, Québec WRITING Sophie Gagnon, Agronomist, Project Management TRANSLATION Coordinator, Agrinova, Alma Rod Willmot, M.A. REVISION LAYOUT AND GRAPHIC DESIGN Disease section: Gérard Gilbert, Agronomist- Sylvie Robitaille, Computer Graphics Technician, CRAAQ, Phytopathologist, Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries Québec et de l’Alimentation du Québec, Québec Insect section: Michèle Roy, Ph.D., Agronomist- Entomologist, Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec, Québec PRODUCED BY FUNDED BY Association des producteurs de bleuets de la Côte-Nord Wild Blueberry Production Guide 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • 57. Accident Prevention Plan INTRODUCTION Like Everything Else in a Farm Enterprise, Health and Security Must Be Managed
    Wild Blueberry in a Context of Production Guide... Sustainable Development 57. Accident Prevention Plan INTRODUCTION Like everything else in a farm enterprise, health and security must be managed. This means dedicating a certain amount of time to these concerns, and emphasizing teamwork. The employer must show that he cares about accident prevention, and employees must be involved in fi nding causes and solutions. BILL C-21 AND EMPLOYER OBLIGATIONS In force since March 31, 2004, the Act to amend the Criminal Code of Canada (Bill C-21) included substantial changes with regard to health and safety in the workplace. Employers are now subject to criminal proceedings after a serious accident if measures were not in place to protect the health and safety of workers. In fact, anyone who manages or supervises one or more workers must show that health and safety obligations are respected, taking all reasonable precautions to prevent bodily injury due to accident. Bill C-21 reinforces the Québec Act respecting Occupational health and safety (see References), which stipulates that every worker has a right to working conditions that have proper regard for his health, safety and physical well-being (section 9). The employer thus has an obligation to take whatever measures are necessary to protect the health and safety of workers (section 51). He must ensure that risks are eliminated at the source by organizing the workplace in a safe manner and by training workers on safe techniques and procedures. He is also obligated to provide individual protection equipment, free of charge, and to require workers to use it.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Blueberry Leaf Disease Guide1 Douglas A
    PP348 Florida Blueberry Leaf Disease Guide1 Douglas A. Phillips, Norma C. Flor, and Philip F. Harmon2 This publication is intended for Florida blueberry growers different blueberry cultivars. Symptoms with different to use as a diagnostic field guide in the identification causes can have similar appearances, and more than and management of common leaf diseases on southern one disease can occur on the same leaf. Growers should highbush blueberry (SHB). Management recommendations consult UF/IFAS Extension or use a lab diagnostic service. include fungicide applications and horticultural inputs Blueberry disease samples can be sent to the UF/IFAS Plant intended to reduce disease severity. Diagnostic Center (plantpath.ifas.ufl.edu/extension/plant- diagnostic-center) or another diagnostic lab for accurate Introduction identification of the problem. Southern highbush blueberry (SHB) cultivars are com- Several leaf diseases affect SHB in Florida and have the mercially grown throughout much of Florida, in both potential to defoliate bushes. For fungal leaf diseases, deciduous and evergreen production systems. Growers in growers have many effective chemical management deciduous production should strive to keep leaves healthy options; however, proper product selection and timing of through flower bud differentiation in fall to ensure opti- application depends on correct disease diagnosis. Because mum yield potential. In evergreen production, it is critical fungicides are only effective for fungal diseases, differentiat- to maintain the prior year’s foliage through winter months ing between symptoms caused by fungi and other factors to support early fruit production the following season. In can help prevent unnecessary fungicide use and costs. both systems, leaves can be damaged by many factors, such as environmental conditions, chemical applications, insects, The first step in diagnosing the cause of leaf symptoms in and diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And
    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (2), стор. 87–97, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), pp. 87–97, 2016 ARTICLE UDC 595.786 CHECK LIST OF NOCTUID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE AND EREBIDAE EXCLUDING LYMANTRIINAE AND ARCTIINAE) FROM THE SAUR MOUNTAINS (EAST KAZAKHSTAN AND NORTH-EAST CHINA) A.V. Volynkin1, 2, S.V. Titov3, M. Černila4 1 Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical Garden, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia 3 The Research Centre for Environmental ‘Monitoring’, S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 4 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae (excluding subfamilies Lymantriinae and Arctiinae) and Noctuidae of the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 216 species. The map of collecting localities is presented. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Erebidae, Asia, Kazakhstan, Saur, fauna. INTRODUCTION The fauna of noctuoid moths (the families Erebidae and Noctuidae) of Kazakhstan is still poorly studied. Only the fauna of West Kazakhstan has been studied satisfactorily (Gorbunov 2011). On the faunas of other parts of the country, only fragmentary data are published (Lederer, 1853; 1855; Aibasov & Zhdanko 1982; Hacker & Peks 1990; Lehmann et al. 1998; Benedek & Bálint 2009; 2013; Korb 2013). In contrast to the West Kazakhstan, the fauna of noctuid moths of East Kazakhstan was studied inadequately.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Conditions in Alaska 2020
    Forest Service U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Alaska Region | R10-PR-046 | April 2021 Forest Health Conditions in Alaska - 2020 A Forest Health Protection Report U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, State & Private Forestry, Alaska Region Karl Dalla Rosa, Acting Director for State & Private Forestry, 1220 SW Third Avenue, Portland, OR 97204, [email protected] Michael Shephard, Deputy Director State & Private Forestry, 161 East 1st Avenue, Door 8, Anchorage, AK 99501, [email protected] Jason Anderson, Acting Deputy Director State & Private Forestry, 161 East 1st Avenue, Door 8, Anchorage, AK 99501, [email protected] Alaska Forest Health Specialists Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, http://www.fs.fed.us/r10/spf/fhp/ Anchorage, Southcentral Field Office 161 East 1st Avenue, Door 8, Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: (907) 743-9451 Fax: (907) 743-9479 Betty Charnon, Invasive Plants, FHM, Pesticides, [email protected]; Jessie Moan, Entomologist, [email protected]; Steve Swenson, Biological Science Technician, [email protected] Fairbanks, Interior Field Office 3700 Airport Way, Fairbanks, AK 99709 Phone: (907) 451-2799, Fax: (907) 451-2690 Sydney Brannoch, Entomologist, [email protected]; Garret Dubois, Biological Science Technician, [email protected]; Lori Winton, Plant Pathologist, [email protected] Juneau, Southeast Field Office 11175 Auke Lake Way, Juneau, AK 99801 Phone: (907) 586-8811; Fax: (907) 586-7848 Isaac Dell, Biological Scientist, [email protected]; Elizabeth Graham, Entomologist, [email protected]; Karen Hutten, Aerial Survey Program Manager, [email protected]; Robin Mulvey, Plant Pathologist, [email protected] State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry 550 W 7th Avenue, Suite 1450, Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: (907) 269-8460; Fax: (907) 269-8931 Jason Moan, Forest Health Program Coordinator, [email protected]; Martin Schoofs, Forest Health Forester, [email protected] University of Alaska Fairbanks Cooperative Extension Service 219 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta Bowman 1951
    AN ANNOTATED LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF ALBERTA1.* Abstract This list consists of 1825 species and varieties of Lepidoptera which have been taken in Alberta. Of these, 657 are records of captures in the hitherto almost completely neglected Microlepidoptera. Though few specialists on this continent have studied the taxonomy of this large group, those who have done so in certain families have generously assisted in classifying the species which are recorded. Unfortunately, in a few families it has been ilnpossible to obtain this assistance. Despite the omissions this necessitates, the list constitutes the most comprehensive catalogue of Microlepidoptera which has, up to the present, been attempted for any province in the Donlinion. Arrangement and nomenclature are based on McDunnough's Check List of the Lepidoptera of Catzada alzd the United States, published in 1938 and 1939. Proposed modifications in nomenclature, presented in subsequent publications, are substituted if they appear to be gaining general acceptance. Locality records for captures are presented by a system of ecological areas of which the chief climatological and biological characteristics are briefly described. Introductory Professional entomologists are very greatly aided in the pursuit of their lifeworlc with its practical objectives by the unstinted and critical industry of competent amateurs. Such amateurs have gathered a vast mass of data upon the distribution and the relative abundance of various insects and have recorded valuable information on the biology of the groups to which they For personal use only. have devoted their particular attention. In no field of entbmological endeavor has this been more in evidence than it is in the study of Lepidoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • 39. Blueberry Leaf Rust
    Wild Blueberry in a Context of Production Guide... Sustainable Development 39. Blueberry Leaf Rust Latin name: Naohidemyces vaccinii (Wint.) Sato, Katsuya et Hiratsuka (Thekopsora minima, Pucciniastrum vaccinii) French name: La rouille Blueberry leaf rust is present in most Québec blueberry fi elds, and its incidence seems to be increasing. It is generally found in one or more sections of a fi eld, often in association with other leaf infections such as powdery mildew and Septoria leaf spot. It has a growing tendency to spread throughout a fi eld where it is present, and infects fi elds both in growth years and crop years. It is characterized as rust-coloured pustules on the underside of leaves. So far in Québec, no infection of blueberry leaf rust alone has required fungicide treatment. DESCRIPTION The incidence of blueberry leaf rust starts to intensify in mid-July. For this reason it has little effect on fi elds that are in a crop year, since harvesting normally occurs in August. In a growth year however, leaf rust can cause extensive leaf spotting and premature leaf drop. By early September there can be signifi cant defoliation, and in severely affected fi elds the production of fl oral buds can be reduced by 30% or more. The symptoms are similar to other leaf diseases, consisting of brown spots in a variety of shapes and sizes, accompanied or not by the leaves turning yellow. However, blueberry leaf rust is easily distinguished by the pustules of rust on the underside of leaves (Figure 1). This fungus produces various types of spores and infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Thekopsora Minima - Occurrence - Prepared By: Julius Kühn-Institute, Institute for Plant Health On: 4 June, 2015, Dr
    1) Express – PRA for Thekopsora minima - Occurrence - Prepared by: Julius Kühn-Institute, Institute for Plant Health on: 4 June, 2015, Dr. Gritta Schrader; Dr. Wolfgang Maier (Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics) (translated by Elke Vogt-Arndt) Initiation: Occurrence of blueberry rust on blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum) in a nursery in Lower Saxony Express - PRA Thekopsora minima P. Syd. & Syd. 1915 Phytosanitary Risk for high medium low Germany Phytosanitary Risk for high medium low EU-MS Certainty of Assessment high medium low Conclusion The fungus Thekopsora minima is endemic in eastern North America and Japan and is not yet established in Germany. In 2002, it presumably was found for the first time in the EU in Southwest Spain but was wrongly identified as the endemic Pucciniastrum vaccinii (Naohidemyces vaccinii). Up to now T. minima is neither listed in the Annexes of the Dir. 2000/29/EC nor by EPPO. Thekopsora minima infests the highbush blueberry Vaccinium corymbosum which is native to North America and various Rhododendrons and Azaleae as well as various further genera of Ericaceae. Two Tsuga-species are alternating hosts. It can be assumed that due to suitable climate conditions Thekopsora minima is capable to establish outdoors in Germany. An establishment in South European EU-Member States would also be possible. Due to its damage potential for cultivated blueberries, Rhododendrons and other Ericaceae, Thekopsora minima poses a considerable phytosanitary risk for Germany and other EU- Member States. Based on this risk analysis, it can be assumed that the pest is able to establish and cause considerable damage in Germany or other Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Canada / Forest Insect and Disease Survey
    FIDS Report 95-2 Forest Insect and Disease Conditions Kamloops Forest Region - 1994 P. Koot and J. Hodge Canadian Forest Service - Pacific and Yukon Region . Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Ie Il Canada Canada Canadian Forest Service canadien Canada Service des forets Pacific and Yukon Region du Pacifique Region et Yukon Contents Foreword 2 Introduction 3 Summary 5 Pine Pests 7 Mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae 7 Western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis 14 Gouty pitch midge, Cecidomyia piniinopis 14 Pine needle diseases, Lophodermella concolor, Hendersonia pinicola, Elytroderma deformans 15 Salt damage 15 Douglas-fir Pests 17 Western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis 17 Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae 23 Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata 24 Spruce Pests 25 Spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis 25 Two-year cycle spruce budworm, Choristoneura biennis 26 Spruce weevil, Pissodes strobi 26 Alpine Fir Pests 27 Western balsam bark beetle, Dryocoetes confusus 27 Balsam woolly adelgid, Adelges piceae 27 Western Hemlock Pests 28 Western hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria lugubrosa 28 Western blackheaded budworm, Acleris gloverana 29 Western Larch Pests 30 Larch needle diseases, Meria laricis, Hypodermella laricis 30 Larch casebearer, Coleophora laricella 30 Multiple Host Pests 30 Black army cutworm, Actebia fennica 30 Deciduous Tree Pests 31 Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar 31 Satin moth, Leucoma salicis 31 A birch leafminer, Lyonetia speculella 31 Aspen leafminer, Phyllocnistis populiella 31 Special Surveys 32 Pests of young stands 32 Acid rain monitoring 35 Other Noteworthy Pests 36 Appendices 39 Foreword This annual report describes and summarizes the status of forest pests and the effects of environmental factors on forests in the Kamloops Forest Region in 1994, and attempts to forecast population trends and highlight pests that are capable of sudden damaging outbreaks with forest management implications.
    [Show full text]