Boston University Student Research This Report Is Published for Educational Purposes Only by Students Competing in the CFA Institute Research Challenge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boston University Student Research This Report Is Published for Educational Purposes Only by Students Competing in the CFA Institute Research Challenge Car Sharing Industry Boston University Student Research This report is published for educational purposes only by students competing in the CFA Institute Research Challenge. Zipcar, Inc. Date: Dec. 12, 2011 Ticker: ZIP (NASDAQ) Recommendation: BUY Price: $14.28 (As of 12/09/11) Price Target: $19.45 Earnings/Share (Normalized to 42.48mm weighted average diluted shares outstanding) Mar. Jun. Sept. Dec. Year P/E Ratio 2008A $(0.17) $(0.08) $(0.04) $(0.05) $(0.34) NA 2009A (0.07) (0.04) (0.03) 0.03 (0.11) NA 2010A (0.13) (0.12) (0.06) (0.02) (0.33) NA 2011E (0.14) (0.13) 0.02 0.00 (0.26) NM Source: CapitalIQ, Student Research GREEN LIGHT TO BUY ZIPCAR We initiate coverage of Zipcar with a one-year price target of $19.45, offering a 36% upside in comparison to a ten-year standard deviation of returns of the Small Cap S&P600 Index of 20%. ZIP will maintain its position as the world’s leader in car sharing through aggressive expansion into markets like Europe, growing membership at a projected CAGR of 17% through 2016. Zipcar’s value proposition will drive membership growth, which will in turn drive revenues. Zipcar use is about 69% less expensive than owning a car, which is a strong incentive for new members to join, especially when coupled with increasing costs of living. We estimate Zipcar’s total revenue growth at 21% CAGR from 2011 through 2016, as a result of new members and increased vehicle utilization. Increased utilization and growing fee revenues will drive margin expansion which will boost earnings. Margin expansion will be driven by higher growth in fee revenue, which we expect to reach 15% of total revenue by 2016, up from 14% in 2011. We forecast EBITDA margin to be 16% by 2016, in comparison to 11% in 2011. Zipcar’s strong solvency position provides room for additional expansion. With the latest debt-to-equity ratio of 35%, Zipcar has an estimated 3.7% after-tax cost of debt. The Company’s asset-backed security notes allow for lower rate borrowings, which can be utilized for vehicle purchases. Zipcar has shown its ability to obtain additional term loans of up to $40 million to finance acquisitions. ZIP is an emerging story which makes it hard for investors to evaluate early in its business life cycle, similar to a venture capital company. We believe this leads to a misunderstanding of the Company’s potential and the low market valuation; however when all variables are well considered, we are confident that ZIP is a BUY. ZIP vs. S&P 600 Market Profile (Apr. 2011 - Dec. 2011) 52-Week Price Range $31.50/$13.87 Average Daily Volume (USD mm) 0.36 0% Beta 1.17 Shares out (USD mm) 39.3 Market Cap (USD mm) 561.2 Institutional Holdings (USD mm) 233.1 -50% Insider Holdings (USD mm) 19.0 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Total Debt to Equity 0.35 Return on Assets (LTM, 3Q11) 0.3% ZIP S&P 600 Return on Equity (LTM, 3Q11) -7.8% Source: CapitalIQ Source: CapitalIQ CFA Institute Research Challenge December 12, 2011 Car Ownership vs. Zipcar Costs USINESS ESCRIPTION Per Year B D Zipcar has grown revenues and membership rapidly but has so far made slow progress towards $6,000 profitability. $5,000 $4,000 Zipcar, founded in 2000 and based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, operates the world’s leading car sharing $3,000 network. Zipcar went public in April of 2011 and has 72% of the car-sharing market share, which is only a small decrease from its 75% market share in 2005 due to its continued domination of the industry. The $2,000 Cost in USD in Cost Company has achieved five-year CAGR of 48% in organic membership growth and the acquisitions of $1,000 Flexcar and Streetcar in 2007 and 2011, added an additional 11% to membership to each year. $- Car Ownership Zipcar A key strength of the firm is the technology utilized in its operations. Private Ownership $4,733 $- Vehicles are reserved by phone, the internet, or through smart-phone applications and are unlocked with a Zipcar $- $455 keyless entry card (Zipcard), using RFID technology. Fleet operations are supported by software that collects Public Transit $720 $720 real-time data on Zipsters and allows the Company to monitor vehicle usage and profitability. Taxi $192 $384 Conventional Rental $- $200 As of 3Q 2011 the Company had operations in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, and Figure 1: Zipsters spend an average $1,800 a year on transportation costs, about 650,000 members, 9,500 cars, 600employees, and a presence in over 130 cities including 15 major versus $5,500 per year for car owners. metropolitan areas. Despite its revenue growing at a CAGR of 67% from 2005 to 2010, Zipcar is making Sources: Victoria Transport Institute, US slow progress to profitability; net income margin of 1% was declared for the third quarter of 2011, but Dept of Transportation, Office of Fair Trading, TaxiFareFinder.com guidance for 4Q2011 is for a net loss. Services: ZIP provides an attractive value proposition for both individual and business Monthly Loss Per Vehicle customers, which should encourage new members to join. $2,500 SG&A Revenue: $1,888 Fleet Rental: ZIP provides self-service vehicles in convenient locations for an annual fee of $60 $2,000 R&D plus an hourly rate of between $7.75 and $13.50 or a monthly fee of $50 and a 10% discount on driving rates. Gas, insurance, and up to 180 free miles per day are included in the price. This results $1,500 Membership in savings of about 69% versus owning a car, despite decreased convenience (see Figure 1 and Services $1,000 Depreciation Exhibit 1 in Appendix). $500 Parking FastFleet: “FastFleet” is a proprietary vehicle-on-demand software that ZIP leases to organizations $- Insurance that manage their own fleet of vehicles, at a rate of $65 to $95 per car. This allows organizations to track vehicles, analyze usage and diagnostic data, and improve efficiency, saving as much as Gas $(500) $1,250 a month per vehicle. Loss: 18.1% Maintenance $(1,000) Cost Drivers: ZIP’s can distribute high fixed costs across its 650,000 members, and will increase Figure 2: Zipcar currently experiences utilization to improve profitability. an 11.5% loss on each vehicle without accounting for fee revenues, a loss they need to address through increased ZIP achieves economies of scale through distribution of fixed cost such as gas, parking, and car purchases, utilization. over its fleet (see Figure 2 and Exhibit 2 in Appendix). ZIP passes on gas price increases to customers, which keeps its own costs down, while still offering a cheaper alternative to customers owning vehicles. Usage Revenue Per Vehicle Per Day Increasing utilization per vehicle will lead to higher revenues per vehicle, which will mean higher $100 profitability as ZIP covers its fixed costs. $90 $80 Revenue per vehicle per day is currently $65, which translates to utilization of 6.5 hours; both have $70 been increasing historically. $60 We believe this trend will continue as ZIP expands its corporate customer base, bringing more $50 $40 weekday utilization (see Figure 3). $30 Additionally, we believe that management is capable of achieving their stated target utilization rate $20 y = 0.013x - 503 of 9 hours, based on their record with past goals (see discussion of Management on page 4). $10 R² = 0.722 $0 Sep-09 Apr-11 Dec-12 Aug-14 Mar-16 CUSTOMERS Actual Predicted Zipcar’s plan for increasing utilization includes a new focus on business and governments. Figure 3: Historical revenue per vehicle per day has been increasing. Individuals: Zipcar has traditionally targeted middle-class customers between the ages of 20 and Assuming a constant hourly rate of 35, who do not own cars and live in densely populated cities. These customers usually utilize $10, this means each car is being Zipcar for weekend trips for social gatherings and shopping. used for more hours daily. Universities: Zipcar operates in over 150 college campuses, offering car sharing to those between the ages of 21 and 25 without the additional charges required by traditional car rental firms. As of September 2011, universities make up 10% of the total revenue base. 2 CFA Institute Research Challenge December 12, 2011 Market Segments Governments and Businesses: The Company partners with governments and corporations to (2011) provide cars and fleet management services (FlastFleet). “Z2B” offerings have grown by 40% as a Universities Govts/Businesses share of revenues since 2005, with 10,000 small and medium sized businesses signed up as of July Individuals 2011. ZIP also offers reduced membership fees and weekday driving rates to companies and governments who use ZIP’s fleet, providing a steadier source of income, since they use cars during 10% weekday hours when individual customers are not using them (see Figure 4). Geographic Presence: ZIP sees increased profitability in established markets, but credible threat from 55% 35% incumbents as it enters new markets. Zipcar targets cities with a large population between 20 and 40 years old, with median household incomes between $34,000 and $72,000. Population density is a key factor for the “established markets,” with an average of 10,590 people per square mile (see Exhibit 3 & 4 in Append ix for Statistics on Zipcar cities). Figure 4: Zipcar has a diversified Cities: The “Established”1 Zipcar cities are New York, San Francisco, Boston, and Washington customer base and has been shifting its focus to businesses.
Recommended publications
  • Avis Budget Group Budget Dollar Dtg / Dtag Ean Ehi
    Car Rental Security Contacts www.carrentalsecurity.com This list is divided into two sections; by company and state. The “company” list includes HQ information. The “state” list only includes field security contacts. Unless otherwise noted, all contacts are for corporate locations only but they should be able to provide contact information for licensee / franchise locations, if applicable. Most agencies have a “controlled” fleet meaning that vehicles seen locally with out of state plates are likely on rent locally. Revised – 09/24/19 Visit www.carrentalsecurity.com for the most current contact list. Please visit www.truckrentalsecurity.com for truck rental/leasing company contacts. Please see footer for additional information. SECURITY CONTACTS – Company ABG ALAMO AVIS AVIS BUDGET GROUP BUDGET DOLLAR DTG / DTAG EAN EHI ENTERPRISE FIREFLY HERTZ NATIONAL PAYLESS PV HOLDING RENTAL CAR FINANCE TCL Funding Ltd Partner THRIFTY ZIPCAR OTHER CAR RENTAL AGENCIES TRUCK RENTALS SECURITY CONTACTS – State AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY CANADA DISCLAIMER – This list is for the exclusive use of Car Rental Security and Law Enforcement. This list IS NOT to be used for solicitation purposes. Every effort has been made to provide accurate and current information. Errors, additions/deletions should be sent to [email protected]. All rights reserved. Copyright 2019 Page 1 Car Rental Security Contacts www.carrentalsecurity.com
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011
    Annual Report 2011 41046.indd 1 4/3/12 6:20 PM First to scale and building momentum Revenue $242 in millions $186 $131 $106 Adjusted $58 EBITDA (1) $10.9 in millions $4.2 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 $(1.6) $(9.8) Members $(13.6) in thousands 673 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 540 349 258 140 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 (1) See inside back cover for reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to U.S. GAAP Net Income (Loss). 41046.indd 2 4/3/12 6:20 PM 2011 Report Dear Stockholders,, This is our fi rst stockholder letter andnd we are delighted to share with you our vision for the future as well as our results from the past year. We believe the stage is set for a new world of urban mobility. We are building momentum around a deliberate shift away from Zipcar’s mission is urban car ownership toward an array of smart transportation options that improve life for many people. As we lead the creation of an to enable simple and exciting new industry, we are dramatically reducing the second largest expense in most households—transportation spending responsible urban living. —and we’re doing it in a way that makes urban life smart, more sustainable and fun! We are inspired to be part of a rare company that can do well by doing good. In short, the information highway is becoming a substitute for At Zipcar, our mission is to enable simple and responsible urban paved highways. In a 2011 survey, 55% of Millennials (ages 18-34) living.
    [Show full text]
  • 3405 Carshare Report
    Arlington Pilot Carshare Program FIRST-YEAR REPORT Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) Division of Transportation Department of Environmental Services April 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 INTRODUCTION . 3 What is Carsharing? . .3 Arlington: A Perfect Fit for Carsharing . 3 Two Carsharing Companies Operating in Arlington . 4 Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) . 4 ARLINGTON PILOT CARSHARING PROGRAM . 5 Public Private Partnership . .5 Program Goals . 5 Program Elements . 5 METHOD OF EVALUATION . 9 EVALUATION OF CARSHARE PILOT PROGRAM . 10 The Carshare Program Increased Availability, Membership and Use . 10 Arlington Carshare Members Trip Frequency and Purpose . 10 Arlington Carshare Members Rate Service Excellent . 11 Carsharing Members Feel Safer with Carshare Vehicles Parked On-Street . 11 Arlington Members More Confident Knowing Arlington is Carshare Partner . 12 Arlington Carsharing Members Reduce Vehicle-Miles Traveled (VMT) . 12 The Pilot Carsharing Program Encourages Transit-Oriented-Living . 13 Carsharing Provides Affordable Alternative to Car Ownership . 14 Arlington Carshare Members Reduce Car Ownership . 15 The Pilot Carshare Program Makes Efficient Use of Parking . 16 CONCLUSIONS . 17 EXTENDING AND EXPANDING SUCCESS . 18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ARSHARING IS A SELF-SERVICE, SHORT-TERM CAR-RENTAL SERVICE that is growing in Europe and North America and has been available in the Cmetropolitan Washington region since 2001. Carsharing complements Arlington’s urban-village neighborhoods by providing car service on demand without the cost and hassles associated with car ownership. In March 2004, the Arlington County Commuter Services (ACCS) unit of the Department of Environmental Services partnered with the two carshare companies—Flexcar and Zipcar—to provide expanded carshare services and promotions called the Arlington Pilot Carshare Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Avis Budget Group Budget Dollar Dtg / Dtag Ean Ehi
    Car Rental Security Contacts www.carrentalsecurity.com This list is divided into two sections; by company and state. The “company” list includes HQ information. The “state” list only includes field security contacts. Unless otherwise noted, all contacts are for corporate locations only but they should be able to provide contact information for licensee / franchise locations, if applicable. Most agencies have a “controlled” fleet meaning that vehicles with out of state plates are likely on rent locally. Revised – 03/16/18 Visit www.carrentalsecurity.com for the most current contact list. Please note the footnote disclaimer. For truck rental/leasing company contacts you may visit www.truckrentalsecurity.com. SECURITY CONTACTS – Company ABG ALAMO AVIS AVIS BUDGET GROUP BUDGET DOLLAR DTG / DTAG EAN EHI ENTERPRISE FIREFLY HERTZ NATIONAL PAYLESS PV HOLDING RENTAL CAR FINANCE TCL Funding Ltd Partner THRIFTY ZIPCAR OTHER CAR RENTAL AGENCIES TRUCK RENTALS SECURITY CONTACTS – State AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY CANADA DISCLAIMER – This list is for the exclusive use of Car Rental Security and Law Enforcement. This list IS NOT to be used for solicitation purposes. Every effort has been made to provide accurate and current information. Errors, additions/deletions should be sent to [email protected]. All rights reserved. Copyright 2013 3/18/2018 - Page 1 Car Rental Security Contacts www.carrentalsecurity.com Top The Hertz Corporation Hertz / Dollar / Thrifty / Firefly 8501 Williams Road / Estero, FL 33928-33501 www.hertz.com www.dollar.com www.thrifty.com www.fireflycarrental.com Vehicle Registrations: • Hertz: “The Hertz Corporation” • Dollar Thrifty: US – “Rental Car Finance”, “Dollar Car Rental”, “Thrifty Car Rental” Canada – “TCL Funding Limited Partnership” 24 Hour Law Enforcement Assistance: • Hertz 800-654-5060 • Dollar: 800-235-9393 • Thrifty: 877-435-7650 HQ - Corporate Security: Gregory Donatello - Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton & Hove
    Brighton & Hove R54.1 – Car Clubs Research in Brighton & Hove Brighton & Hove August 2009 (revised version March 2010) Cleaner and better transport in cities Project no. TREN/FP7TR/218940 ARCHIMEDES Project Name ARCHIMEDES (Achieving Real Change with Innovative Transport Measure Demonstrating Energy Savings) Start date of the 15/09/2008 Project Duration: 48 months Measure: No. 54: Car-Sharing Scheme Improvements in Brighton & Hove Task: 11.6.1: Car Clubs Deliverable: R54.1: Car Clubs Research in Brighton & Hove th Due date of 15 March 2009 Deliverable: Actual 16th September 2009 submission date: Revised for March 2010 Dissemination Public Level Organisation Brighton & Hove Responsible Author Luke Ede Quality Control Alan Lewis Version 0.6 Date last updated 3rd March 2010 2 / 31 Cleaner and better transport in cities Contents 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................4 1.1 BACKGROUND CIVITAS.......................................................................................................................4 1.2 BACKGROUND ARCHIMEDES.............................................................................................................5 1.3 PARTICIPANT CITIES ..............................................................................................................................5 1.3.1 Leading City Innovation Areas......................................................................................................5 2. BRIGHTON
    [Show full text]
  • Aktueller Stand Des Car-Sharing in Europa
    more options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Juni 2010 Bundesverband CarSharing e. V. Willi Loose momo Car-Sharing More options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Grant agreement No.: IEE/07/696/SI2.499387 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 I Inhaltsverzeichnis 0. Zusammenfassung 1 1. Einleitung und Übersicht 7 1.1 Das Projekt momo Car-Sharing 7 1.2 Inhalt des Berichts 9 2. Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa 11 2.1 Überblick 11 2.2 Stand des Car-Sharing in europäischen Ländern 13 2.2.1 Belgien 13 2.2.2 Dänemark 14 2.2.3 Deutschland 14 2.2.4 Finnland 15 2.2.5 Frankreich 16 2.2.6 Großbritannien 16 2.2.7 Irland 17 2.2.8 Italien 18 2.2.9 Niederlande 19 2.2.10 Österreich 19 2.2.11 Portugal 19 2.2.12 Schweden 20 2.2.13 Schweiz 20 2.2.14 Spanien 21 2.3 Vergleichende Einschätzung des Car-Sharing-Wachstums 21 3. Befragung der europäischen Car-Sharing-Anbieter 24 3.1 Methodik der Befragung 24 3.2 Rücklauf der Fragebögen 25 3.3 Ausgewählte Befragungsergebnisse 27 3.3.1 Erhebungsergebnisse zur Car-Sharing-Nutzung 27 3.3.2 Erhebungsergebnisse zu Kooperationen der Car-Sharing-Anbieter 39 3.3.3 Erhebungsergebnisse zur politischen Unterstützung 50 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 II 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT The New NY Bridge Project serve customers in a growth environment. We Letter to our increased rental revenue across all our regions and verticals, and we continued to foster organic growth through cross-selling. This was aided by Stockholders the expansion of our specialty segment to 323 Our record performance in 2018 underscored locations. our ability to capitalize on demand through a combination of scale, technology and other Furthermore, while the U.S. equipment rental sustainable competitive advantages. This is industry grew by a solid 8% in 2018, we grew how we best serve our customers and create faster. Our rental revenue, pro-forma for 2017 value for our investors. acquisitions, increased 10.5% year-over-year. Growth is synergistic for us: it creates the We entered 2018 from a position of strength, with potential for greater efficiency and generates a large and diversified presence in North America. cash that we use to advance our strategy. During the year, we acquired BakerCorp, a fluid solutions specialist business, and BlueLine, a In 2018, in addition to allocating capital for national construction equipment rental company, M&A, rental fleet, technology and productivity as well as several smaller operations. These initiatives, we embarked on a $1.25 billion share transactions helped us reach a new milestone of repurchase program to provide further value for over $8 billion in annual revenue. our stockholders. We intend to complete the program in 2019. For the full year 2018, United Rentals delivered GAAP earnings per diluted share of $13.12, Value through Productivity compared with $15.73 for the full year 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models
    Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models Susan A. Shaheen1 and Nelson D. Chan2 Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Carsharing continues to grow worldwide as a powerful strategy to provide an alternative to solo driving. The viability of electric vehicles, or EVs, has been examined in various carsharing business models. Moreover, new technologies have given rise to electromobility, or e-mobility, systems. This paper discusses the evolution of e-mobility in carsharing business models and the challenges and opportunities that EVs present to carsharing operators around the world. Operators are now anticipating increased EV proliferation into vehicle fleets over the next 5- 10 years as technology, infrastructure, and public policy shift toward support of e- mobility systems. Thus, research is still needed to quantify impacts of EVs in changing travel behavior toward more sustainable transport. 1 Introduction Carsharing enables a group of members to share a vehicle fleet that is maintained, managed, and insured by a third-party organization. Primarily used for short-term trips, carsharing can provide affordable, self-service vehicle access 24-h per day for those who do not have a car, want to reduce the number of vehicles in their household, or do not use their vehicle during the day for long periods of time. Rates include fuel, insurance, and maintenance. Ideally, carsharing works best in a neighborhood, business, or campus setting where users could walk, bike, share rides, or take public transit to access the shared-use vehicles. Carsharing has evolved through several phases since the first carsharing system began in Europe in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Bus Information
    OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS AND SCHOLARS Phone: 504.280.6021 // Fax: 504.280.7317 E-mail: [email protected] // Web: http://oiss.uno.edu TRANSPORTATION BUS INFORMATION The bus fare in the city of New Orleans is $1.25, exact change only. If you will be changing buses, give the driver an additional 25 cents to obtain a bus transfer. When you get on the second bus, just give that driver the transfer. Express buses cost $1.50 — they do not make as many stops as the regular buses. Bus stops are marked with a white sign with purple, green and gold stripes. They say BUS STOP and most of them (not all) list at the bottom of the sign the numbers of the buses which stop at that location. If you’ll be riding the bus several times during one day, you can buy a one-day pass for $3 from any of the bus drivers. With this you can take unlimited rides for the day. You can buy a three-day pass for $9, for unlimited rides during that period. You can buy a five-day pass for $15. If you ride the bus on a daily basis, you might want to buy a monthly bus pass for $55. The passes are color-coded by month, so you should buy the pass at the beginning of the month. Check the bus system web site for a route map and individual bus schedules www.norta.com. Note: Fare prices subject to change without notice. Please check website to confirm current rates.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Program Evaluation Report
    On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Evaluation On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Program Evaluation Report JANUARY 2017 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY | SUSTAINABLE STREETS DIVISION | PARKING 1 On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Evaluation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GOAL: “MAKE TRANSIT, WALKING, BICYCLING, TAXI, RIDE SHARING AND CARSHARING THE PREFERRED MEANS OF TRAVEL.” (SFMTA STRATEGIC PLAN) As part of SFpark and the San Francisco Findings Municipal Transportation Agency’s (SFMTA) effort to better manage parking demand, • On-street car share vehicles were in use an the SFMTA conducted a pilot of twelve on- average of six hours per day street car share spaces (pods) in 2011-2012. • 80% of vehicles were shared by at least ten The SFMTA then carried out a large-scale unique users pilot to test the use of on-street parking • An average of 19 unique users shared each spaces as pods for shared vehicles. The vehicle monthly On-Street Car Share Parking Permit Pilot (Pilot) was approved by the SFMTA’s Board • 17% of car share members reported selling of Directors in July 2013 and has been or donating a car due to car sharing operational since April 2014. This report presents an evaluation of the Pilot. Placing car share spaces on-street increases shared vehicle access, Data from participating car share convenience, and visibility. We estimate organizations show that the Pilot pods that car sharing as a whole has eliminated performed well, increased awareness of thousands of vehicles from San Francisco car sharing overall, and suggest demand streets. The Pilot showed promise as a tool for on-street spaces in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-03 Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area
    Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report | Report Number 20-03 | February 2020 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Mission Statement: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Vision Statement: Serve as a catalyst – advancing energy innovation, technology, and investment; transforming New York’s economy; and empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority New York, NY Robyn Marquis, PhD Project Manager, Clean Transportation Prepared by: WXY Architecture + Urban Design New York, NY Adam Lubinsky, PhD, AICP Managing Principal Amina Hassen Associate Raphael Laude Urban Planner with Barretto Bay Strategies New York, NY Paul Lipson Principal Luis Torres Senior Consultant and Empire Clean Cities NYSERDA Report 20-03 NYSERDA Contract 114627 February 2020 Notice This report was prepared by WXY Architecture + Urban Design, Barretto Bay Strategies, and Empire Clean Cities in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter the "Sponsors"). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Sponsors or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, the Sponsors, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Charging: Charging up University Campuses
    Workplace Charging: Charging Up University Campuses Carrie Giles, ICF International Carrie Ryder, ICF International Stephen Lommele, National Renewable Energy Laboratory March 2016 DRAFT REPORT Workplace Workplace Charging: Charging Up University Campuses As leading regional employers, colleges and universities are on the front line of local- and national-level technology trends. To remain competitive, many schools are offering plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charging to their faculty, staff, and students. While the installation and management of PEV charging stations requires planning, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Workplace Charging Challenge, launched in 2013, aims to support these charging efforts. This document highlights the experiences of university partners in the Top 5 Reasons for Campus Charging: Workplace Charging Challenge (Challenge) that demonstrate the many benefits charging - Reduce commuter emissions provides to higher education institutions. PEV - Offer research opportunities charging stations, known as electric vehicle - Provide employee and student benefits supply equipment (EVSE), provide a service to - Enable fleet charging employees and students, signal environmental - Signal environmental leadership. leadership, deliver educational and research opportunities, and play an important role in achieving greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction goals. Clean Commute Workplace charging at universities is an effective way to reduce a school’s Scope 31 emissions, which include emissions generated through employee commuting. Many universities have pledged to reduce GHG emissions either individually or through national pledges, such as the American College and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCC). PEV charging stations are effective tools to help achieve these goals. Reducing commuter emissions through workplace charging is particularly important on suburban, rural, and remote campuses with limited public transportation options.
    [Show full text]