AMINOPENICILLINS (Veterinary—Systemic)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AMINOPENICILLINS (Veterinary—Systemic) AMINOPENICILLINS (Veterinary—Systemic) This monograph includes information on the following: Amoxicillin; organisms.{R-3; 12} Ampicillin. Cattle: Ampicillin for injectable suspension is indicated for the treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by susceptible Some commonly used brand names are: organisms, including some bacterial pneumonias associated For veterinary-labeled products— with shipping fever complex.{R-3; 5} ELUS,CANHorsesEL: Ampicillin for injection is used for the treatment Amoxi-Drop [Amoxicillin] Moxilean-50 Suspension of pneumonia caused by susceptible organisms.{R-1} [Amoxicillin] Skin and soft tissue infections (treatment)— Amoxil Tablets Polyflex [Ampicillin] Cats and dogs: Amoxicillin for oral suspension, amoxicillin [Amoxicillin] tablets, and ampicillin for injectable suspension are indicated Amoxi-Tabs [Amoxicillin] and ELUS,CANampicillin for injectionEL is used in the treatment of soft tissue infections and wounds caused by susceptible For human-labeled products— organisms.{R-3; 5; 6; 14; 29} Apo-Ampi [Ampicillin] Nu-Ampi [Ampicillin] ELUS,CANHorsesEL: Ampicillin for injection is used in the treatment Novo-Ampicillin of skin and soft tissue infections, including abscesses and [Ampicillin] wounds, caused by susceptible organisms.{R-1} ELUS,CANStrangles (treatment)EL—Horses: Ampicillin for injection may be used in the treatment of strangles caused by susceptible Category: Antibacterial (systemic). {R-1} Streptococcus equi. Tonsillitis, bacterial (treatment); or Indications ELCANTracheobronchitis, bacterial (treatment)EL; or ELUS EL Note: The text between and describes uses that are not included Upper respiratory tract infections (treatment)—Cats and dogs: ELCAN EL in U.S. product labeling. Text between and describes uses Amoxicillin for oral suspension, amoxicillin tablets, and that are not included in Canadian product labeling. ampicillin for injectable suspension are indicated and The ELUS or ELCAN designation can signify a lack of product ELUS,CANampicillin for injectionEL is used in the treatment of availability in the country indicated. See the Dosage Forms tonsillitis and upper respiratory tract infections caused by section of this monograph to confirm availability. susceptible organisms.{R-3; 5; 6; 14; 29} ELCANAmoxicillin for oral suspension and amoxicillin tablets are indicated in the treatment General considerations of tracheobronchitis in dogs, caused by susceptible organisms.EL{R- The aminopenicillins have activity against penicillin-sensitive gram- 6; 14} positive bacteria as well as some gram-negative bacteria. Urinary tract infections, bacterial (treatment)—Cats and dogs: Ampicillin is effective against alpha- and beta-hemolytic Amoxicillin for oral suspension, amoxicillin tablets, and streptococci, including Streptococcus equi,{R-1} non–penicillinase- ampicillin for injectable suspension are indicated while producing Staphylococcus species, some Bacillus anthracis, and ELUS,CANampicillin for injection and ampicillin capsulesEL are used most strains of Clostridia.{R-3} Ampicillin is also effective against in the treatment of urinary tract infections, including cystitis and gram-negative bacteria, including many strains of Escherichia coli urethritis, caused by susceptible organisms.{R-3; 5; 6; 14; 15; 24; 29} (E. coli), Salmonella, and Pasteurella multocida.{R-3} Amoxicillin has the same spectrum of activity as ampicillin, but has slightly Potentially effective better activity against some gram-negative bacteria, including E. ELUS,CANBacterial infections (treatment)EL—Calves, nonruminating: At coli, and Salmonella species.{R-4} Most anaerobic bacteria, except one time, amoxicillin tablets were labeled in the United States for beta-lactamase–producing strains of Bacteroides, are sensitive to use in the treatment of infections in calves caused by susceptible amoxicillin.{R-78} The aminopenicillins are subject to destruction E. coli.{R-8} Although the labeled product is no longer available, by beta-lactamases and therefore are not effective against some oral amoxicillin may be used in the treatment of susceptible bacteria that produce these enzymes.{R-1; 3} Most strains of infections in calves. Klebsiella, Proteus, and Pseudomonas are resistant.{R-1; 23} ELUS,CANLeptospirosis (treatment)EL—Dogs: Although the efficacy has not been established, amoxicillin is used in therapy of Accepted leptospirosis in dogs. Penicillin and penicillin derivatives ELCANDermatitis, bacterial (treatment)EL—Dogs: Amoxicillin for oral (including amoxicillin) are considered to be effective for suspension and amoxicillin tablets are indicated in the treatment eliminating leptospiremia, but it is not known if they are effective of bacterial dermatitis caused by susceptible organisms; however, in terminating the carrier state.{R-13; 30; 31} amoxicillin is not the treatment of choice because bacteria that cause dermatitis are often resistant to this medication.{R-6; 14; 68-70} Regulatory Considerations Gastroenteritis, bacterial (treatment)—Cats and dogs: Amoxicillin for U.S. and Canada— ELCAN oral suspension, amoxicillin tablets, and ampicillin for Withdrawal times have been established for ampicillin for EL ELUS,CAN injectable suspension are indicated and ampicillin for injectable suspension. See the Dosage Forms section.{R-3; 5; 8} EL injection is used in the treatment of bacterial gastrointestinal tract infections caused by susceptible organisms.{R-3; 5; 6; 14; 29} Pneumonia, bacterial (treatment)— Chemistry ELCANCalves, nonruminatingEL: Ampicillin for injectable Source: {R-14} suspension is indicated for the treatment of respiratory tract Amoxicillin—Semisynthetic derivative of ampicillin. {R-1} infections caused by susceptible organisms, including some Ampicillin—Semisynthetic penicillin. bacterial pneumonias associated with shipping fever Chemical name: complex.{R-3} Amoxicillin—4-Thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylic Cats and dogs: ELCANAmpicillin for injectable suspensionEL is acid, 6-[[amino(4-hydroxyphenyl)acetyl]amino]-3,3- indicated and ELUS,CAN amoxicillin for oral suspension, dimethyl-7-oxo-, trihydrate[2S-[2 alpha,5 alpha,6 beta(S*)]]- {R-16} amoxicillin tablets, and ampicillin for injectionEL are used in . the treatment of pneumonia caused by susceptible Ampicillin—4-Thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylic © 2007 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention All rights reserved 1 acid, 6-[(aminophenylacetyl)amino]-3,3-dimethyl-7-oxo-, 86} Ampicillin trihydrate administered intramuscularly produces [2S-[2 alpha,5 alpha,6 beta(S*)]]-.{R-16} lower ampicillin blood concentrations that extend over a longer Ampicillin sodium—4-Thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2- period of time than does ampicillin sodium.{R-27; 49} carboxylic acid, 6-[(aminophenylacetyl)amino]-3,3-dimethyl- Note: There is evidence that giving amoxicillin and clavulanate 7-oxo-, mono-sodium salt, [2S-[2 alpha,5 alpha,6 beta(S*)]]- concurrently has little effect on the pharmacokinetics of .{R-16} either medication;{R-82} therefore, the following information Molecular formula: based on dosing with amoxicillin and clavulanate {R-16} Amoxicillin—C16H19N3O5S⋅3H2O. combination may be useful in predicting the absorption of {R-16} Ampicillin—C16H19N3O4S. amoxicillin alone. {R-16} {R-82} Ampicillin sodium—C16H18N3NaO4S. Calves— Molecular weight: Preruminant calves (2 weeks old): Absorption of Amoxicillin—419.45.{R-16} amoxicillin when administered orally in Ampicillin—349.40.{R-16} combination with clavulanate at doses of 10 to 20 Ampicillin sodium—371.39.{R-16} mg per kg of body weight (mg/kg) is 34 to 36%. Description: Early ruminant calves (6 weeks old): Absorption of Amoxicillin USP—White, practically odorless, crystalline amoxicillin and clavulanate combination is much powder.{R-17} poorer than in preruminant calves given the same Ampicillin USP—White, practically odorless, crystalline oral dose; therapeutic serum amoxicillin powder.{R-17} concentrations are not achieved in early ruminant Ampicillin Sodium USP—White to off-white, odorless or calves. practically odorless, crystalline powder. Is hygroscopic.{R-17} pKa:{R-22} Distribution: The aminopenicillins are rapidly and widely {R-6; 8; 23; 39} Amoxicillin—2.8 and 7.2. distributed into most body fluids with the exception of {R-69} Ampicillin—2.7 and 7.3. fluids of the eye and the prostate gland; also, distribution into {R-8} Solubility: cerebrospinal fluid is low unless the meninges are inflamed. {R-21; 34; 75} Amoxicillin USP—Slightly soluble in water and in methanol; Penetration into synovial fluid is high. insoluble in carbon tetrachloride and in chloroform.{R-17} Volume of distribution— Ampicillin USP—Slightly soluble in water and in methanol; Amoxicillin: Horses— insoluble in carbon tetrachloride and in chloroform.{R-17} Adults: {R-42} Ampicillin Sodium USP—Very soluble in water and in isotonic Area—0.33 liter per kg of body weight (L/kg). {R-86} sodium chloride and dextrose solutions.{R-17} Steady state—0.19 L/kg. Foals (6 to 7 days of age): Area—0.37 L/kg.{R-41} Pharmacology/Pharmacokinetics Steady state—0.27 L/kg.{R-41} Note: Unless otherwise noted, pharmacokinetic data in this section are Ampicillin: based on intravenous administration of ampicillin or amoxicillin. Cats—Area: 0.12 L/kg.{R-40} There is evidence that administering ampicillin concurrently Horses—Steady state: 0.18 L/kg;{R-23; 86} 0.26 L/kg.{R-85} with either gentamicin or kanamycin does not alter the {R-34; 84} pharmacokinetics of either of the medications in horses. Protein binding: Amoxicillin—Horses:
Recommended publications
  • Simultaneous Determination of Amoxicillin and Clavulanic Acid in Pharmaceutical Preparations by Capillary Zone Electrophoresis
    Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences vol. 52, n. 2, apr./jun., 2016 Article http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502016000200006 Simultaneous determination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in pharmaceutical preparations by capillary zone electrophoresis Gabriel Hancu1,*, Anamaria Neacşu1, Lajos Attila Papp1, Adriana Ciurba2 1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, TîrguMureş, Romania, 2Department of PharmaceuticalTechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Tîrgu Mureş, Romania Clavulanic acid enhances the antibacterial spectrum of amoxicillin by rendering most β-lactamase producing isolates susceptible to the drug. A fast, simple and efficient capillary electrophoresis method was developed for the simultaneous determination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid from complex mixtures. Using a 25 mM sodium tetraborate as background electrolyte at a pH of 9.30, + 25 kV applied voltage, 25 °C system temperature, UV determination at 230 nm; we succeeded in simultaneous separation of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in approximately 2 minutes. The analytical performance of the method was evaluated in terms of reproducibility, precision, accuracy, and linearity. The optimized analytical method was applied for the determination of the two analytes from combined commercial pharmaceutical preparations. This CE method is fast, inexpensive, efficient, and environmentally friendly when compared with the more frequently used high performance liquid chromatography methods described in the literature. Uniterms: Amoxicillin/determination. Clavulanic acid/determination. Capillary electrophoresis/ quantitative analysis. Antibacterials/quantitative analysis. O ácido clavulânico acentua o espectro antibacteriano de amoxicilina, tornando a maioria dos isolados produtores de β-lactamase sensíveis ao fármaco. Desenvolveu-se um método rápido, simples e eficiente de electroforese capilar (EC) para a determinação simultânea de amoxicilina e de ácido clavulânico a partir de misturas complexas.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Susceptibilities of Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella Spp. To
    Jpn. J. Infect. Dis., 60, 227-229, 2007 Short Communication In Vitro Susceptibilities of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella Spp. to Ampicillin-Sulbactam and Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid Birgul Kacmaz* and Nedim Sultan1 Department of Central Microbiology and 1Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey (Received January 30, 2007. Accepted April 13, 2007) SUMMARY: Ampicillin-sulbactam (A/S) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AUG) are thought to be equally efficacious clinically against the Enterobacteriaceae family. In this study, the in vitro activities of the A/S and AUG were evaluated and compared against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed by standard agar dilution and disc diffusion techniques according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). During the study period, 973 strains were isolated. Of the 973 bacteria isolated, 823 were E. coli and 150 Klebsiella spp. More organisms were found to be susceptible to AUG than A/S, regardless of the susceptibility testing methodology. The agar dilution results of the isolates that were found to be sensitive or resistant were also compatible with the disc diffusion results. However, some differences were seen in the agar dilution results of some isolates that were found to be intermediately resistant with disc diffusion. In E. coli isolates, 17 of the 76 AUG intermediately resistant isolates (by disc diffusion), and 17 of the 63 A/S intermediately resistant isolates (by disc diffusion) showed different resistant patterns by agar dilution. When the CLSI breakpoint criteria are applied it should be considered that AUG and A/S sensitivity in E. coli and Klebsiella spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Ampicillin (Ampicillin Sodium) INJECTION, POWDER, FOR
    Ampicillin for Injection, USP Rx Only (For Intramuscular or Intravenous Injection) To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of ampicillin and other antibacterial drugs, ampicillin should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by bacteria. DESCRIPTION Ampicillin for injection, USP the monosodium salt of [2S-[2α,5α,6β(S*)]]-6- [(aminophenylacetyl)amino]-3,3-dimethyl-7-oxo-4-thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylic acid, is a synthetic penicillin. It is an antibacterial agent with a broad spectrum of bactericidal activity against both penicillin-susceptible Gram-positive organisms and many common Gram-negative pathogens. Ampicillin for injection, USP is a white to cream-tinged, crystalline powder. The reconstituted solution is clear, colorless and free from visible particulates. Each vial of Ampicillin for injection, USP contains ampicillin sodium equivalent to 250 mg, 500 mg, 1 gram or 2 grams ampicillin. Ampicillin for injection, USP contains 65.8 mg [2.9 mEq] sodium per gram ampicillin. It has the following molecular structure: The molecular formula is C16H18N3NaO4S, and the molecular weight is 371.39. The pH range of the reconstituted solution is 8 to 10. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Ampicillin for injection diffuses readily into most body tissues and fluids. However, penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid and brain occurs only when the meninges are inflamed. Ampicillin is excreted largely unchanged in the urine and its excretion can be delayed by concurrent administration of probenecid. Due to maturational changes in renal function, ampicillin half-life decreases as postmenstrual age (a sum of gestational age and postnatal age) increases for infants with postnatal age of less than 28 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Use for Sepsis in Neonates and Children: 2016 Evidence Update
    Antibiotic Use for Sepsis in Neonates and Children: 2016 Evidence Update Aline Fuchsa, Julia Bielickia,b, Shrey Mathurb, Mike Sharlandb, Johannes N. Van Den Ankera,c a Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland b Paediatric Infectious Disease Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom c Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children’s National Health System, Washington, DC, USA WHO-Reviews 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Aims ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Background ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.1. Definition and diagnosis ................................................................................................. 3 Neonatal Sepsis ............................................................................................................................... 3 Paediatric Sepsis ............................................................................................................................. 4 Community versus hospital acquired sepsis .................................................................................. 5 1.2.2. Microbiology ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Pharmacology of Ampicillin in Infants and Children
    Central Journal of Drug Design and Research Bringing Excellence in Open Access Review Article *Corresponding author Gian Maria Pacifici,Associate professorof Pharmacology,via Sant’Andrea 32,56127 Pisa,Italy. Clinical Pharmacology of Email: [email protected] Submitted: 19 April 2021 Accepted: 25 April 2021 Ampicillin in Infants and Published: 27 April 2021 ISSN: 2379-089X Children Copyright © 2021 Pacifici GM Gian Maria Pacifici* OPEN ACCESS Associate professorof Pharmacology, Italy Keywords Abstract • Ampicillin • Dosing Ampicillin is an aminopenicillin and is more active than penicillin G. Ampicillin is destroyed by β-lactamase • Treatment and is co-formulated with sulbactam an inhibitor of β-lactamase. Ampicillin is bactericidal and it is active • Trials against meningococci, Listeria monocytogenes, enterococci, and the co-administration with sulbactam markedly • Placental-transfer expands the spectrum of activity against Haemophilus influenzae, Escherichia coli, Proteus, and Bacillus fragilis. • Breast-milk Ampicillin may be administered intravenously and orally and the intravenous dose is 50 mg twice-daily and • Meningitis thrice-daily in preterm and term infants, respectively. The oral dose in children ranges from 125 to 500 mg 4 times-daily and increases with the chid age. Ampicillin has been found efficacy and safe in infants and children but may cause adverse-effects. In infants, the ampicillin elimination half-life ranges between 2.4 to 5.0 hours and decreases with infant maturation and in children it is about 0.8 hours. Ampicillin interacts with drugs, the treatment and the trials with ampicillin have been extensively studied in infants and children. This antibiotic freely crosses the human placenta but poorly migrates into the breast-milk.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Coverage of 3 Antibiotic Regimens for Neonatal Sepsis in the Hospital Setting Across Asian Countries
    Original Investigation | Global Health Evaluation of the Coverage of 3 Antibiotic Regimens for Neonatal Sepsis in the Hospital Setting Across Asian Countries Julia A. Bielicki, MD; Mike Sharland, MD; Paul T. Heath, FRCPCH; A. Sarah Walker, PhD; Ramesh Agarwal, MD; Paul Turner, PhD; David A. Cromwell, PhD Abstract Key Points Question What is the antibiotic IMPORTANCE High levels of antimicrobial resistance in neonatal bloodstream isolates are being coverage offered by empirical neonatal reported globally, including in Asia. Local hospital antibiogram data may include too few isolates to sepsis treatment with aminopenicillin- meaningfully examine the expected coverage of antibiotic regimens. gentamicin, third-generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime or OBJECTIVE To assess the coverage offered by 3 antibiotic regimens for empirical treatment of ceftriaxone), and meropenem in Asian neonatal sepsis in Asian countries. countries? DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A decision analytical model was used to estimate coverage Findings In this decision analytical of 3 prespecified antibiotic regimens according to a weighted-incidence syndromic combination model based on a decision tree, 8376 antibiogram. Relevant data to parameterize the models were identified from a systematic search of isolates from 10 countries were used to Ovid MEDLINE and Embase. Data from Asian countries published from 2014 onward were of interest. estimate coverage. Meropenem Only data on blood culture isolates from neonates with sepsis, bloodstream infection, or bacteremia generally had the highest coverage reported from the relevant setting were included. Data analysis was performed from April 2019 to (from 64.0% in India to 90.6% in July 2019. Cambodia) followed by aminopenicillin- gentamicin (from 35.9% in Indonesia to EXPOSURES The prespecified regimens of interest were aminopenicillin-gentamicin, third- 81.0% in Laos) and cefotaxime or generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime or ceftriaxone), and meropenem.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflection Paper on the Use of Aminopenicillins and Their Beta
    1 13 September 2018 2 EMA/CVMP/AWP/842786/2015 3 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) 4 Reflection paper on the use of aminopenicillins and their 5 beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations in animals in the 6 European Union: development of resistance and impact 7 on human and animal health 8 Draft Draft agreed by Antimicrobials Working Party (AWP) 9 July 2018 Adopted by CVMP for release for consultation 13 September 2018 Start of public consultation 21 September 2018 End of consultation (deadline for comments) 21 December 2018 9 Comments should be provided using this template. The completed comments form should be sent to [email protected] 10 Keywords aminopenicillins, antimicrobial resistance 11 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2018. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 12 13 Table of contents 14 Executive summary ..................................................................................... 4 15 CVMP Recommendations for action ............................................................. 6 16 1. Background ............................................................................................. 7 17 2. General drug characteristics .................................................................... 8 18 2.1. Structure and mechanism of action ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINRES-Vet 2016–2017 Finnish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Consumption of Antimicrobial Agents
    Evira publications 5/2018 FINRES-Vet 2016–2017 Finnish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Consumption of Antimicrobial Agents Evira publications 5/2018 FINRES-Vet 2016–2017 Finnish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Consumption of Antimicrobial Agents FINRES-Vet 2016–2017 - Finnish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Consumption of Antimicrobial Agents Authors and institutions participating in making the FINRES-Vet report Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira Suvi Nykäsenoja, Tarja Pohjanvirta, Mia Biström, Mirja Raunio-Saarnisto, Liisa Kaartinen, Henriette Helin-Soilevaara, Katariina Pekkanen Finnish Medicines Agency FIMEA Katariina Kivilahti-Mäntylä, Martti Nevalainen Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki Merja Rantala, Thomas Grönthal Acknowledgements The coordinators of the FINRES-Vet programme wish to thank the meat inspection personnel of Evira and slaughterhouses for collecting the samples from animals at slaughter. Also, the personnel of Evira who has participated in the meat sampling at retail are acknowledged. Any use of data from FINRES-Vet 2016–2017 should include a specific reference to this report. Suggested citation: FINRES-Vet 2016-2017, Finnish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Consumption of Antimicrobial Agents, Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Helsinki, Finland, ISSN 1797-299X, ISBN 978-952-225-173-2 (pdf). This report is available at www.evira.fi FINRES-Vet 2016–2017 - Finnish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Consumption
    [Show full text]
  • The Efficacy of Ampicillin Compared with Ceftriaxone on Preventing
    Assawapalanggool et al. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control (2018) 7:13 DOI 10.1186/s13756-018-0304-6 RESEARCH Open Access The efficacy of ampicillin compared with ceftriaxone on preventing cesarean surgical site infections: an observational prospective cohort study Srisuda Assawapalanggool1, Nongyao Kasatpibal2*, Supatra Sirichotiyakul3, Rajin Arora4, Watcharin Suntornlimsiri5 and Anucha Apisarnthanarak6 Abstract Background: Cesarean surgical site infections (SSIs) can be prevented by proper preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Differences in antibiotic selection in clinical practice exist according to obstetricians’ preferences despite clear guidelines on preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ampicillin and ceftriaxone in preventing cesarean SSIs. Methods: The observational prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Thailand from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2012. Propensity scores for ceftriaxone prophylaxis were calculated from potential influencing confounders. The cesarean SSI rates of the ceftriaxone group vs. those of the ampicillin prophylactic group were estimated by multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression nested by propensity score. Results: Data of 4149 cesarean patients were collected. Among these, 911 patients received ceftriaxone whereas 3238 patients received ampicillin as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The incidence of incisional SSIs was (0.1% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.001) and organ space SSIs was (1.2% vs. 2.9%; p = 0.003) in the ceftriaxone group compared with the ampicillin group. After adjusting for confounders, the rate ratios of incisional and organ/space SSIs in the ceftriaxone compared with the ampicillin group did not differ (RR, 0.23; 95% CI 0.03–1.78), and (RR, 1.62; 95% CI 0.83–3.18), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceftaroline Fosamil for the Treatment of Gram-Positive Endocarditis: CAPTURE Study Experience
    International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 53 (2019) 644–649 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijantimicag Ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of Gram-positive endocarditis: CAPTURE study experience ∗ Christopher J. Destache a, David J. Guervil b, Keith S. Kaye c, a School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA b Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA c Wayne State University and Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Background: The clinical experience of ceftaroline fosamil (CPT-F) therapy for Gram-positive infective Received 3 October 2018 endocarditis is reported from CAPTURE, a retrospective study conducted in the USA. Accepted 27 January 2019 Methods: Data, including patient demographics, medical history, risk factors, microbiological aetiology and clinical outcomes, were collected by review of patient charts between September 2013 and February Editor: Professor Matthew Falagas 2015. Results: Patients ( n = 55) with Gram-positive endocarditis were treated with CPT-F. The most common Keywords: risk factors were intravascular devices (43.6%), diabetes mellitus (40.0%) and injection drug use (38.2%). Ceftaroline fosamil Gram-positive endocarditis The most commonly isolated pathogens were meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; 80%), Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA; 7.3%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (7.3%). CPT-F was given Meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus as first-line therapy in 7.3% of patients and as second-line or later therapy in 92.7% of patients, and as CAPTURE study monotherapy in 41.8% of patients and as concurrent therapy in 58.2% of patients.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCH-Vet Anresis.Ch
    Usage of Antibiotics and Occurrence of Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria from Humans and Animals in Switzerland Joint report 2013 ARCH-Vet anresis.ch Publishing details © Federal Office of Public Health FOPH Published by: Federal Office of Public Health FOPH Publication date: November 2015 Editors: Federal Office of Public Health FOPH, Division Communicable Diseases. Elisabetta Peduzzi, Judith Klomp, Virginie Masserey Design and layout: diff. Marke & Kommunikation GmbH, Bern FOPH publication number: 2015-OEG-17 Source: SFBL, Distribution of Publications, CH-3003 Bern www.bundespublikationen.admin.ch Order number: 316.402.eng Internet: www.bag.admin.ch/star www.blv.admin.ch/gesundheit_tiere/04661/04666 Table of contents 1 Foreword 4 Vorwort 5 Avant-propos 6 Prefazione 7 2 Summary 10 Zusammenfassung 12 Synthèse 14 Sintesi 17 3 Introduction 20 3.1 Antibiotic resistance 20 3.2 About anresis.ch 20 3.3 About ARCH-Vet 21 3.4 Guidance for readers 21 4 Abbreviations 24 5 Antibacterial consumption in human medicine 26 5.1 Hospital care 26 5.2 Outpatient care 31 5.3 Discussion 32 6 Antibacterial sales in veterinary medicines 36 6.1 Total antibacterial sales for use in animals 36 6.2 Antibacterial sales – pets 37 6.3 Antibacterial sales – food producing animals 38 6.4 Discussion 40 7 Resistance in bacteria from human clinical isolates 42 7.1 Escherichia coli 42 7.2 Klebsiella pneumoniae 44 7.3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 48 7.4 Acinetobacter spp. 49 7.5 Streptococcus pneumoniae 52 7.6 Enterococci 54 7.7 Staphylococcus aureus 55 Table of contents 1 8 Resistance in zoonotic bacteria 58 8.1 Salmonella spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Swedres-Svarm 2005
    SVARM Swedish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Preface .............................................................................................4 Summary ..........................................................................................6 Sammanfattning................................................................................7 Use of antimicrobials (SVARM 2005) .................................................8 Resistance in zoonotic bacteria ......................................................13 Salmonella ..........................................................................................................13 Campylobacter ...................................................................................................16 Resistance in indicator bacteria ......................................................18 Escherichia coli ...................................................................................................18 Enterococcus .....................................................................................................22 Resistance in animal pathogens ......................................................32 Pig ......................................................................................................................32 Cattle ..................................................................................................................33 Horse ..................................................................................................................36 Dog
    [Show full text]