Atherix Braunsi Nov. Sp., a South African Leptid with Gregarious
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Part 614 Stream Visual Assessment Protocol Version 2
United States Department of National Biology Handbook Agriculture Natural Subpart B—Conservation Planning Resources Conservation Service Part 614 Stream Visual Assessment Protocol Version 2 South Carolina Washington Utah Iowa (190–VI–NBH, Amend. 3, December 2009) Issued draft December 2009 For additional information contact: Fisheries Biologist West National Technology Support Center 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1000 Portland, OR 97232 (503) 273–2400 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all pro- grams.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for commu- nication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. (190–VI–NBH, Amend. 3, December 2009) Preface This document presents a revised and updated NRCS Stream Visual As- sessment Protocol Version 2 (SVAP2) for use by conservation planners, field office personnel, and private landowners. Like its predecessor, it is a relatively easy-to-use tool for qualitatively evaluating the condition of aquatic ecosystems associated with wadeable streams, that is, those shal- low enough to be sampled without use of a boat. -
Key to the Larval Stages of Aquatic True Flies (Diptera), Based on the Operational Taxa List for Running Waters in Germany
Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 2007, 43 (1), 61-74 Key to the larval stages of aquatic true flies (Diptera), based on the operational taxa list for running waters in Germany A. Sundermann1*, S. Lohse1, L.A. Beck2, P. Haase1 1 Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Department of Limnology and Conservation, Clamecystrasse 12, D-63571 Gelnhausen, Germany 2 Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Zoology, Marburg, Germany The aquatic larvae of the Diptera are often the most abundant and most diverse group of the benthic macroinvertebrate fauna. They are able to survive in and colonise practically all freshwater habitats, and some species can tolerate harsh environmental conditions. They are therefore both a qualitatively and quantitatively important group of biological indicators for assessing fresh- water systems. On the other hand their determination at the species level is very difficult. This is in part due to a lack of taxo- nomic work in the group, but also the absence of comprehensive determination keys, that meet the needs of water managers. As a result, the aquatic larvae of the Diptera often play a subordinate role in water management. In light of the EU Water Framework Directive the present work is a first step in improving the integration of the important group of the Diptera in water management practice: a comprehensive determination key, which is geared at water managers. The key includes 60 taxa, largely at the family and genus level. In contrast to already existing keys the present work tries to differentiate the taxa on the basis of simple and user-friendly characters. -
Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names
Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L. -
Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum
Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). INSECT SPECIES Except where otherwise noted all insect and invertebrate taxonomy based on (1) Arnett, R.H. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 1024 pp; (2) Marshall, S.A. 2013. Insects: Their Natural History and Diversity, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 732 pp.; (3) Bugguide.net, 2003-2017, http://www.bugguide.net/node/view/15740, Iowa State University. ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA--Mayflies Taxonomy based on (1) Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton, and D.J. Conklin Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. 456 pp; (2) Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing. 1158 pp. FAMILY LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE—Pronggillled Mayflies FAMILY BAETIDAE—Small Minnow Mayflies Habrophleboides sp. Acentrella sp. Habrophlebia sp. Acerpenna sp. Leptophlebia sp. Baetis sp. Paraleptophlebia sp. Callibaetis sp. Centroptilum sp. FAMILY CAENIDAE—Small Squaregilled Mayflies Diphetor sp. Brachycercus sp. Heterocloeon sp. Caenis sp. Paracloeodes sp. Plauditus sp. FAMILY EPHEMERELLIDAE—Spiny Crawler Procloeon sp. Mayflies Pseudocentroptiloides sp. Caurinella sp. Pseudocloeon sp. Drunela sp. Ephemerella sp. FAMILY METRETOPODIDAE—Cleftfooted Minnow Eurylophella sp. Mayflies Serratella sp. -
Bdckbromsen, Atherix Idis (Diptera: Athericidae), I Sverige: En Riidlistad Flugas Utbredning Och Status Sronn Malmevist
Bdckbromsen, Atherix iDis (Diptera: Athericidae), i Sverige: en riidlistad flugas utbredning och status srOnN MALMevIST Malmqvist, B.: Biickbromsen, Atherix lbls (Diptera: Athericidae), i Sverige: en rtjdlistad flugas utbredning och status. [The ibis fly, Atherix iDis (Diptera: Athericidae), in Sweden: the distribution and status of a redJisted fly speciesl. - Ent. Tidskr. 117 (l-2):23-28. Uppsala, Sweden 1996. ISSN 0013-886x. The ibis fly, Atherix ibls, inhabits riffles of streams and rivers in Nonh Sweden. It is included in the Swedish Red Data List under category 3 ("Rare"). Recent studies suggest that this species is in fact rather common in streams and rivers within its distribution area given the stream/river size is in the interval between 5 and 40 m. In a survey of 55 sites in northeastern Sweden, 22 were in this size interval and A. ibis was present at 15 of these sites. The difference between sites with and without A. ibis was positively related to water quality in terms of pH and conductivity, and negatively to filamentous algae, altitude and channel width, as indicated by a multiple discriminant analysis. B. Malmqvist, Dept. of Animal Ecology, Umed University, S-901 87 Umed, Sweden. Bakgrund Bdckbromsen , Atherix i bis (Fabricius, 1798) (Fig. beliigna. Betydelsen av det hiir spektakuliira l), iir sliiktets enda art i norra Skandinavien (Tho- aggregationsbeteendet dr fortfarande inte utredd. mas 1978, 1993a,1994). Den har ett stort utbred- Larverna ir glupska stickande-sugande rovdjur, ningsomride som sftacker sig frin Brittiska ciarna, som kan fcirekomma i hoga tiitheter pi stenbotten i Pyren6erna och Frankrike i vdster till Japan i oster biickar och ilvar (Fig. -
Chapter 9 Biodiversity of Diptera
Chapter 9 Biodiversity of Diptera Gregory W. Courtney1, Thomas Pape2, Jeffrey H. Skevington3, and Bradley J. Sinclair4 1 Department of Entomology, 432 Science II, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, Universitetsparken 15, DK – 2100 Copenhagen Denmark 3 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 Canada 4 Entomology – Ontario Plant Laboratories, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 Canada Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, 1st edition. Edited by R. Foottit and P. Adler © 2009 Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 978-1-4051-5142-9 185 he Diptera, commonly called true flies or other organic materials that are liquified or can be two-winged flies, are a familiar group of dissolved or suspended in saliva or regurgitated fluid T insects that includes, among many others, (e.g., Calliphoridae, Micropezidae, and Muscidae). The black flies, fruit flies, horse flies, house flies, midges, adults of some groups are predaceous (e.g., Asilidae, and mosquitoes. The Diptera are among the most Empididae, and some Scathophagidae), whereas those diverse insect orders, with estimates of described of a few Diptera (e.g., Deuterophlebiidae and Oestridae) richness ranging from 120,000 to 150,000 species lack mouthparts completely, do not feed, and live for (Colless and McAlpine 1991, Schumann 1992, Brown onlyabrieftime. 2001, Merritt et al. 2003). Our world tally of more As holometabolous insects that undergo complete than 152,000 described species (Table 9.1) is based metamorphosis, the Diptera have a life cycle that primarily on figures extracted from the ‘BioSystematic includes a series of distinct stages or instars. -
(Diptera). I Diagnoseso F the Family
452 Proc. Japan Acad., 51 (1975) [Vol. 51, 96. Definition of Coenomyitidae (Diptera). I Diagnoseso f the Family By Akira NAGATOMI Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University (Comm. by Sajiro MAKINO, M. J. A., June 3, 1975) The purpose of this paper is to establish the definition of the Coenomyiidae. Hennig (1967) stated that "Fur die Coenomyiidae sind dagegen bisher keine abgeleiteten Merkmale angegeben worden", and Oldroyd (1969) wrote that ".. , a number of primitive genera, in various regions of the world, cannot satisfactorily be allocated to any of the larger families. The simplest solution is to assemble all these genera into one family, Coenomyiidae, while recognizing that this is not necessarily a natural unit." Nagatomi and Saigusa (1970) , who revised the Coenomyiidae of Japan, put the genera Glutops and Pseudoerinna into the Coenomyii- dae, while Tesky (1970a) treated Glutops as one of the Pelecorhyn- chidae and Krivosheina (1971) erected a new family Glutopidae for Glutops. 1t is shown in this series of papers that Bequaertomyia is noth- ing but a synonym of Pseudoerinna; Dialysis is a true member of Coenomyiidae ; and Glutops and Pseudoerinna (=Bequaertomyia) seem to be ancestral among the Rhagionidae. Bequaertomyia was diversely placed in the Tabanidae, Pelecorhynchidae, or Coenomyii- dae, and Dialysis was always placed in the Rhagionidae. It is concluded that the family Coenomyiidae consisting of the genera Coenomyia, Anacanthaspis, Art hropeas, Odontosabula (=Stratioleptis), and Dialysis (= Triptotricha) is homogeneous or monophyletic. This conclusion is based on the result of my study given below. The Coenomyiidae contain the five genera just mentioned and are characterized as follows : Head : (1) mid-lower face roughly triangular in shape, not swollen but flat, and plate-like, that is to say, with the margin more or less turned up and continued around below palpus and proboscis (Fig. -
The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Soldierflies and Allies
The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Soldierflies and Allies by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] Version 1.3 14 February 2017 1 Summary This document provides a 2016 update for soldierflies and allies to the checklist of diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire published by Kidd and Bindle in 1959, with supplements in 1964 and 1971. Overall statistics on recording activity are given by decade and hectad. Checklists are presented for each of the three Watsonian vice-counties 58, 59, and 60 detailing for each species the number of records, year of earliest and most recent record, and the number of hectads with records. A combined checklist showing distribution by the three vice- counties is also included, covering a total of 92 species. Introduction It is now nearly 60 years since Leonard Kidd and Alan Brindle, eminent entomologists at the national level1,2, published their compendium of the dipterous fauna of the Lancashire and Cheshire region3. Supplements were issued with details of species new to the county lists in 19644 and 19715, but these do not appear to have been maintained or reviewed since then, with the exception of the fungus gnats6. Moreover, Ref 3 was only the first part of the projected publication. The acalyptrates and calyptrates remained to be covered but a further part never appeared. In the succeeding half-century, and particularly since the millennium, the recording of some of the diptera has been advanced greatly by the publication of new keys accessible to a wider community of amateur recorders and the availability of digital tools to record and analyse data, as well as discussion fora to assist identification. -
Final Report: Inventory of Invertebrate Fauna in Devils Postpile National Monument
Final Report: Inventory of Invertebrate Fauna in Devils Postpile National Monument Submitted by Jeff G Holmquist, PhD and Jutta Schmidt-Gengenbach University of California White Mountain Research Station 3000 E Line St Bishop, CA 93514 USA [email protected] 760.387.1909 Revised, 7 Nov 2005 Submitted to: Danny Boiano, Aquatic Ecologist Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks 47050 Generals Highway Three Rivers, CA 93271 Sierra Nevada Network – Devils Postpile National Monument NRPP - Regional Small Park Block Allocation National Park Service, Pacific West Region Contract R8590030067 Funding Received: $30,000 2 Summary The Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project identified aquatic and riparian systems as the most altered and impaired habitats of the Sierra Nevada range. Devils Postpile National Monument includes many kilometers of high-elevation stream habitat and associated meadow habitat, dominated by the Middle Fork of the San Joaquin River. This environment is under significant pressure from intense usage. Although there has been little inventory of invertebrates in Devils Postpile, these fauna are an important group to survey because of the variety of ecosystem services that they provide. Invertebrates include primary, secondary, tertiary, and higher-level consumers, and in turn invertebrates are a critical food resource for a variety of terrestrial, aquatic, and flying species. This inventory investigated fauna throughout the riparian corridor of the Middle Fork of the San Joaquin River. We sampled riffle and pool habitats in the river and both flooded and dry portions of meadows. We chose quantitative sampling devices for use in this inventory so that we could also report baseline ecological data. Sampling was performed over two growing seasons, from May 2003 through October 2004, from snowmelt until snowfall, and we have also included limited data collected before the start of the project, during the summer of 2002. -
Use of Arthropods to Evaluate Water Quality of Streams
USE OF ARTHROPODS TO EVALUATE WATER QUALITY OF STREAMS Technical Bulletin No. 100 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Madison, WI 1977 ABSTRACT Arthropods were used to evaluate the water quality of Wiscon sin streams. The biotic index based upon arthropod samples is a sensitive and effective method, for it yields information on present quality and past perturbations. Every species was assigned an index value on the basis of collections made previously and in this study, for the purpose of calculating the biotic index. Water quality determinations were then made for 53 Wisconsin streams based on these values. A sampling procedure for evaluating all streams in an area is given. USE OF ARTHROPODS TO EVALUATE WATER QUALITY OF STREAMS By William L. Hilsenhoff Technical Bulletin No. 100 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Box 7921, Madison, Wisconsin 53707 1977 CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 3 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AS RELATED TO WATER QUALITY 3 Materials and Methods 5 Results and Discussion 10 EVALUATION OF WISCONSIN'S STREAMS 10 Materials and Methods 10 Results and Discussion 10 Conclusions and Recommendations 12 LITERATURE CITED 13 APPENDIX 1: Values Assigned to Species and Genera for the Purpose of Calculating a Biotic Index INTRODUCTION I Since the effect of stream pollu more significant publications on the 1 to indicate pollution. Every year tion is an alteration of the aquatic subject, but there have been many new indexes are proposed and used ecosystem, evaluation of that others. to evaluate water quality, but all ecosystem b the logical way to In using arthropods to evaluate have serious drawbacks. Most im detect pollution. -
Colorado River Aquatic Resources Investigations Federal Aid Project F-237R-18
Colorado River Aquatic Resources Investigations Federal Aid Project F-237R-18 R. Barry Nehring General Professional V Co-Authors Brian Heinold Justin Pomeranz Tom Remington, Director Federal Aid in Fish and Wildlife Restoration Job Progress Report Colorado Division of Wildlife Aquatic Wildlife Research Section Fort Collins, Colorado June 2011 STATE OF COLORADO John W. Hickenlooper, Governor COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Mike King, Executive Director COLORADO DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Tom Remington, Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION Tim Glenn, Chair Robert G. Streeter, Ph.D., Vice Chair Kenneth M. Smith, Secretary David R. Brougham Dennis G. Buechler Dorothea Farris Allan Jones John W. Singletary Dean Wingfield Ex Officio/Non-Voting Members: Mike King, Department of Natural Resources John Stulp, Department of Agriculture AQUATIC RESEARCH STAFF George J. Schisler, General Professional VI, Aquatic Wildlife Research Leader Rosemary Black, Program Assistant I Stephen Brinkman, General Professional IV, Water Pollution Studies Eric R. Fetherman, General Professions IV, Salmonid Disease Investigations Ryan Fitzpatrick, General Professional IV, Eastern Plains Native Fishes Matt Kondratieff, General Professional IV, Stream Habitat Restoration Jesse M. Lepak, General Professional V, Coldwater Lakes and Reservoirs R. Barry Nehring, General Professional V, Stream Fisheries Investigations Brad Neuschwanger, Hatchery Technician IV, Research Hatchery Kyle Okeson, Technician III, Fish Research Hatchery Christopher Praamsma, Technician III, Fish Research Hatchery Kevin B. Rogers, General Professional IV, Colorado Cutthroat Studies Kevin G. Thompson, General Professional IV, GOCO - Boreal Toad Studies Harry Vermillion, General Professional III, F-239, Aquatic Data Analysis Nicole Vieira, Physical Scientist III, Toxicologist Paula Nichols, Federal Aid Coordinator Kay Knudsen, Librarian i Prepared by: R. Barry Nehri g, General essional V, Aquatic Wildlife Researcher Approved by: George J. -
Soldierflies and Allies Recording Scheme Newsletter 1, Autumn 2013
Dipterists Forum Soldierflies and Allies Recording Scheme Newsletter 1, autumn 2013 Edited by Martin C. Harvey ISSN 2053-471X (print) ISSN 2053-4728 (online) Villa cingulatus, Buckinghamshire © Martin Harvey Welcome to the first edition of the newsletter for the Soldierflies and Allies Recording Scheme! This follows on from the 28th newsletter of the Larger Brachycera Recording Scheme, which came out in spring 2010. Thanks to all who have contributed articles, photos and records. Why the name change? Well, it’s partly to bring the recording scheme in line with the title of the main book on this group of flies (i.e. the BENHS guide by Alan Stubbs and Martin Drake), partly due to the term “Larger Brachycera” having fallen out of favour with taxonomists, but mostly in order to make the recording scheme a bit more approachable and understandable for a wiser audience. Downland Villa on the move? After the gap in records during the second half of the 20th century, the Downland Villa Villa cingulata is being recorded with increasing frequency and at new sites. The map below shows the data currently on the recording scheme database (not yet complete - I’m aware of some published records that haven’t yet been databased). After being rediscovered in East Gloucestershire, Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire in Distribution map for Downland Villa, Villa cingulata, in southern England. page 1 Soldierflies and Allies Recording Scheme – Newsletter 1 Dipterists Forum the first decade of the 21st century, records since 2010 have extended the known range to include Wiltshire (recorded by Andy Foster, Nick Upton and Paddy Saunders), Berkshire (Jason Gosling), and in 2013 to South Hampshire (Ivan Perry) and Middlesex (Martin Harvey).