DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimizing Investments in Kazakhstan's Hiv Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optimizing Investments in Kazakhstan's Hiv Response Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The rest of this page intentionally left blank. OPTIMIZING INVESTMENTS IN KAZAKHSTAN’S HIV RESPONSE Republican AIDSCenter author: B.S. Baiserkin UNAIDS Kazakhstan author: Aliya Bokazhanova World Bank authors: Clemens Benedikt, David Wilson, Emiko Masaki, Marelize Görgens and Michael Obst UNDP authors: Predrag Đurić, Christoph Hamelmann University of New South Wales authors: Andrew Shattock, Cliff C. Kerr, Robyn M. Stuart, and David P. Wilson Global Fund authors: Nicolas Farcy, David Kokiashvili Tatyana Vinichenko, and Shufang Zhang UNAIDS authors: Roman Hailevich, Manoela Manova, and Otilia Scutelniciuc © International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Internet: www.worldbank.org; Telephone: 202 473 1000 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. Note that The World Bank does not necessarily own each component of the content included in this work. The World Bank therefore does not warrant that the use of the content contained in the work will not infringe on the rights of third parties. The risk of claims resulting from such infringement rests solely with you. The contents of this report do not necessarily represent the views and positions of the World Bank, UNAIDS, UNDP, the Global Fund, participating government agencies or other partner institutions. In particular, the findings and modeling analyses presented in this report focus primarily on the cost considerations and epidemiological effects of HIV programs. Individual findings represented in tables or specific sections of this report should not be viewed or cited in isolation. They should be seen in the context of the overall recommendations of this report and other considerations such as equity in service access and health benefits beyond the HIV response. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported licence (CC BY 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/3.0. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution – Please cite the work as follows: The World Bank. 2015. Optimizing Investments in Kazakhstan’s HIV Response Washington DC: World Bank. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 Translations – If you create a translation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World Bank translation. The World Bank shall not be liable for any content or error in its translation. All queries on rights and licenses should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC, 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; email: [email protected]. CONTENTS Key Messages: ............................................................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... ix 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Necessity for allocative efficiency ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives of the analysis ...................................................................................................................... 2 2. Kazakhstan’s Health and HIV Financing Context ................................................................... 5 3. Methodology: How Will This Report Answer Key Questions? ............................................ 9 3.1 Optima Model ............................................................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Analytical framework ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.3 Limitations of analysis ........................................................................................................................ 11 4. Results and Their Interpretations ............................................................................................ 13 4.1 What is the status of the HIV epidemic in Kazakhstan? ........................................................ 13 4.2 What are the expected trends if current conditions are maintained? ............................ 13 4.3 Optimizing resources toward moderate targets and national strategy targets using current unit costs by 2020 ..................................................................................... 16 4.4 How much would it cost to achieve moderate and ambitious national targets with reduced ART cost? ...................................................................................................... 25 4.5 Impact of funding to opioid substitution therapy programs .............................................. 28 4.6 Efficiency gains from optimized allocations .............................................................................. 29 5. Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................................ 31 Appendixes A. Technical Summary of Optima ..................................................................................................................... 35 B. Calibration of the Model to Epidemic Data ............................................................................................. 40 C. Cost-Coverage-Outcome curves ................................................................................................................... 41 D. Other results ......................................................................................................................................................... 42 E. Glossary .................................................................................................................................................................. 45 F. References ............................................................................................................................................................. 47 Figures 1.1 Actual and optimized allocations in Kazakhstan’s HIV response with reduced unit cost of ART and reduced management costs, 2015–20............................................................ x 2.1 Kazakhstan: General Government Expenditure on Health (GGHE) as share of general government expenditure, 1995–2012 (%) ............................................................................................. 6 2.2 Kazakhstan: Health spending by source of financing, 1995–2012 (% GDP) ............................ 6 2.3 Kazakhstan: Aid disbursements, 2002–12 (US$ million) ................................................................. 7 2.4 Kazakhstan: HIV/AIDS spending by source of financing, 2012 (%) ............................................ 7 2.5 Kazakhstan: HIV/AIDS-related aid disbursements by donor, 2002–12 (US$ million) ........ 8 iii iv Contents 2.6 Levels of HIV disease burden compared to levels of HIV spending (%) .................................... 8 4.1 Kazakhstan: Model-predicted evolution of annual HIV incidence, 2000–20 ........................ 16 4.2 Kazakhstan: Optimizing spending toward national ambitious targets to reduce HIV incidence and AIDS-related deaths to 50 percent of their 2014 levels by 2020 .................. 16 4.3 Kazakhstan: Comparison of epidemic outcomes key to the national targets, 2014 ........... 18 4.4 Kazakhstan: Total number of new HIV infections over time, 2010–20 ................................... 19 4.5 Kazakhstan: Total number of AIDS-related deaths over time, 2010–20 ................................. 19 4.6 Kazakhstan: Total number of people living with HIV over time, 2010–20 ............................ 20 4.7 Kazakhstan: Total population prevalence over time, 2010–20 .................................................. 20 4.8 Kazakhstan: Number of new HIV infections by population, 2010–20 ..................................... 21 4.9 Kazakhstan: Number of people receiving treatment, 2010–20 .................................................. 21 4.10 Breakdown of “management and other costs,” 2013 (%) ............................................................. 24 4.11 Minimal spending to achieve national and ambitious targets with reduced ART cost ..... 26 4.12 Epidemic outcomes associated with allocations with reduced ART cost, 2014–20 ........... 26 4.13 Spending scenarios simulated to assess the impact of OST programs, 2015–30 ................ 28 4.14 Incidence among PWID and the number of PWID living with HIV in the 3 OST scenarios, 2010–30 ........................................................................................................................... 29 Tables 3.1 Modeling parameterization ........................................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Costs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DA Evaluation Guidelines
    Development Account Final Report 1. KEY PROJECT FEATURES I. Project title UNECE FAO UNDA 8th tranche project “Sustainable Forest Management for Greener Economies in the Caucasus and Central Asia” II. Project DA code 2013-ROA-3634-2944-6875-0036 III. Implementing UNECE FAO Forestry and Timber Section Entity IV. Start date 08/2013 VI. End date a. Original: 06/2015 b. Actual date: 12/2015 VII. Beneficiary 1. Armenia_________________ 5. Kyrgyzstan countries 2. Azerbaijan 6. Tajikistan (pilot) 3. Georgia (pilot) 7. Uzbekistan 4. Kazakhstan (pilot) VIIII Implementing UN system Other partners partners 1. FAO 1. GIZ 2. UNFF 3. UNDP March 2016 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS All seven project countries, namely Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan completed their activities according to the project workplan. Altogether 2 regional, 7 national, 9 coaching and 28 local capacity-building workshops were organized. The training package including modules on green economy and sustainable forest management, wood energy, forest policy formulation, and forest data collection and reporting, have been produced for the benefits of the participants. In addition, the training package included variety of participatory exercises to better introduce methodology for stakeholder engagement. Based on the workshop evaluations 91% of the participants acknowledged increased knowledge on policy formulation, bioenergy generation and data collection related to sustainable forest management and green economy. Three pilot countries, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan made a progress towards inclusion of green economy principles into the national forestry sector’s strategies and programmes. With support of the project, Georgia developed a national action plan for the forest sector in a green economy based on the input received from four local workshops.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 26Th Regional Conference Europe
    26th Conference of the OIE Regional Commission for Europe Bern, Switzerland, 22-26 September 2014 FINAL REPORT World Organisation for Animal Health12 rue de Prony, 75017 Paris, France • tel: 33 (0)1 4.15.18.88 fax: 3 (0)1 42.67.09.87 • www.oie.int • [email protected] CONTENTS Page § List of abbreviations ....................................................................................................... v Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1-2 Tuesday 23 September 2014 Opening Ceremony .......................................................................................................... 1 3-4 Election of the Conference Committee .......................................................................... 1 5 Adoption of the Agenda and Timetable ......................................................................... 1 6 Election of Session Chairpersons and Rapporteurs for Technical Items and Animal Health Situation ......................................................................................... 2 7 OIE Activities and Vision for the 21st Century ............................................................ 2 8-39 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 5 40-49 Activities of the OIE Regional Commission for Europe including the regional initiative and mechanism for OIE standard setting in Europe .............. 5 50-56 Activities and work programme
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalization of the Republic of Belarus Financial Market Within the Eaeu
    LIBERALIZATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS FINANCIAL MARKET WITHIN THE EAEU Report 36 Centre for Integration Studies Saint Petersburg 2016 UDC 336.025 BBK 65.050.63.3 Editor of the series of reports: Evgeny Vinokurov, PhD (Econ) Managing Editor: Anna Isakova Copyeditor: Lyubov Tamazova Proofreader: Sergey Tarakanov Layout: Yaroslav Podkorytov Authors: Mikhail Demidenko, PhD (Econ) (EDB Centre for Integration Studies); Igor Pelipas, PhD (Econ); Irina Tochitskaya, PhD (Econ) (Institute of Privatization and Management Research Center). Project manager: Mikhail Demidenko, EDB Centre for Integration Studies. Liberalization of the Republic of Belarus Financial Market within the EAEU. — St. Petersburg: Centre for Integration Studies, 2016. — p. 55 ISBN 978-5-906157-27-0 The anticipated formation of a common financial market within the EAEU opens up new opportunities for Belarus to attract resources into its economy and enhance the efficiency of the distribution of financial resources, and creates the basis for incentivizing trade in financial services. At the same time, the combining of financial markets also entails a number of challenges for the country. In this connection, the purpose of this study was, first, to examine international experience in liberalizing access to the domestic financial market for foreign financial service providers, and in lifting restrictions in the area of the cross-border movement of capital and simplification of exchange arrangements; and second, to identify the risks that Belarus may encounter as the result of liberalization of its financial market within the EAEU. The study is based on the assumption that Belarus will fulfill the obligations it has assumed with respect to the formation of an EAEU common market (in particular, liberalization of the financial account, eliminating mandatory surrender of foreign exchange, etc.), and the recommendations offered in the paper are aimed at reducing possible risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Youth Employment in CIS Countriespdf
    December / 2020 Gender and youth employment in CIS countries ILO Decent Work Technical Support Team and Country Office for Eastern Europe and Central Asia – Employment Country Reports Series Copyright © International Labour Organization 2020 This is an open access work distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO License (http://creativecom- mons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo). Users can reuse, share, adapt and build upon the original work, even for commercial purposes, as detailed in the License. The ILO must be clearly credited as the owner of the original work. The use of the emblem of the ILO is not permitted in connection with users’ work. Translations – In case of a translation of this work, the following disclaimer must be added along with the attribution: This translation was not created by the International Labour Office (ILO) and should not be considered an official ILO translation. The ILO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. Adaptations – In case of an adaptation of this work, the following disclaimer must be added along with the attribution: This is an adaptation of an original work by the International Labour Office (ILO). Responsibility for the views and opinions expressed in the adaptation rests solely with the author or authors of the adaptation and are not endorsed by the ILO. All queries on rights and licensing should be addressed to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email to [email protected]. ISBN: 978-92-2-033924-4 (print) ISBN: 978-92-2-033925-1- (web-pdf) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equity in STEM in Higher Education
    “Gender, STEM, and education are mainstays of global economic and develop- ment agendas, but finally Ro, Fernandez, and Ramon have created a broadly representative collection of empirical and conceptual work that addresses issues of access at the institutional level alongside accounts of the experiences and choices that individual women make as part of their everyday experiences and inequities as they participate in STEM education and eventually in their profes- sional lives as well. This volume bridges the macro-to-micro gap better than any I’ve seen on this topic.” – Alexander W. Wiseman, Professor of Educational Psychology & Leadership, Texas Tech University, USA “The editors and contributors of this penetrating volume fill a hole in the comparative higher education literature. Readers will appreciate the attention to the worldwide pipeline, to intersectionality, and to policy approaches that may effect greater gender equity in STEM at a global level.” – David M. Post, Professor of Education at Pennsylvania State University and Past-President of Comparative and International Education Society, USA “A talented group of emerging scholars have spearheaded a timely contribu- tion to STEM higher education on six continents. It will, undoubtedly, make significant contributions to factors affecting linkages among gender and uni- versity enrollments and degree completions. This anthology impressively dis- cusses topics – culture, demographics, geography, and statistics – as variables, contributing to enhanced comprehension of STEM and its impact on higher education among different types of university structures.” – Beverly Lindsay, Co-Director and Principal Investigator, Division of Social Sci- ences, University of California, USA “Gender Equity in STEM provides a balance and much needed examination of gender and STEM at the global level, and, across ten countries.
    [Show full text]
  • "Ministerial Conference on the International
    > P.O. Box 20401 2500 EK Den Haag The Netherlands Directorate-General for Energy, Telecommunications House of Representatives and Competition of the States General Energy Market Department Binnenhof 4 Visit address 2513 AA THE HAGUE Bezuidenhoutseweg 73 2594 AC Den Haag The Netherlands Postal address P.O. Box 20401 2500 EK Den Haag The Netherlands Billing address P.O. Box 16180 2500 BD Den Haag The Netherlands Date Organisation Code Re Ministerial Conference on the International Energy Charter 20-21 May 00000001003214369000 2015 T +31 (0)70 379 8911 www.rijksoverheid.nl/ez Dear Madam President, The Ministerial Conference on the International Energy Charter will be held on 20 Our ref. and 21 May 2015 in the Netherlands. This letter fulfils the promise I made on 10 DGETM-EM / 15014527 1 June 2014 to inform your House about the Netherlands’ offer to organise this Your ref. event in The Hague. Encl. The main purpose of the conference is to adopt and sign the modernised Energy 1 Charter, which will be known as the International Energy Charter. The aim of this conference and political declaration is to stimulate international energy cooperation. I am organising this ministerial conference in close cooperation with the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation. What is the purpose of this initiative? The Energy Charter was born from a Dutch initiative resulting from the 1990 Lubbers Plan. This plan envisaged the integration of the energy market of Eastern Europe, including the post-Soviet states, with Western Europe and the international market, and it was enshrined in a political declaration, the Energy Charter2, signed in The Hague in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • LINK Global Economic Outlook 2015-2016
    Unedited United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs LINK Global Economic Outlook 2015-2016 New York October 2014 1 Acknowledgements This report presents the short-term prospects for the global economy in 2015-2016, including major risks and policy challenges. The report draws on the analysis of staff in the Global Economic Monitoring Unit (GEMU) of the Development Policy and Analysis Division (DPAD), United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), and on inputs from the experts of Project LINK. The regional outlooks include inputs provided by the UN Regional Commissions (ESCAP, ESCWA, ECA, ECE and ECLAC). UNCTAD provided input to the section on commodity prices. The current report was coordinated by Matthias Kempf, with contributions from Grigor Agabekian, Clive Altshuler, Hung-Yi Li, Ingo Pitterle, Hamid Rashid, Sebastian Vergara, Sergio Vieira and John Winkel. Cordelia Gow and Ann D’Lima provided statistical and editorial assistance. The interns Sha Miao, Jeremy Yu and Fabio Haufler also made contributions. Pingfan Hong provided general guidance. This report is prepared for the UN DESA Expert Group Meeting on the World Economy (Project LINK) to be held on 22-24 October 2014 in New York. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations or its Member States. 2 Contents Overview................................................................................................................................................4 I. Global macroeconomic prospects ..........................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Kazakhstan's Integration Into the Eurasian Economic Community
    Review of European Studies; Vol. 7, No. 7; 2015 ISSN 1918-7173 E-ISSN 1918-7181 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Impact of Kazakhstan’s Integration into the Eurasian Economic Community on the Competitiveness of the Country’s Agriculture Alma Batanovna Temyrbekova1, Erkyn Batanovich Temyrbek1,Nurzhamal Buribaevna Tastandieva1, Kuat Zhumabekovich Jandosov1 & Nur Anvarbekovich Aldabergenov2 1 Department of Economics and Logistics, Almaty Management University, Almaty, Kazakhstan 2 Higher School of Economics and Business, al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan Correspondence: Alma Batanovna Temyrbekova, Almaty Management University, Rozybakiev str., 227, Almaty, 050060, Kazakhstan. Tel: 7-727-302-2136. Received: March 11, 2015 Accepted: March 31, 2015 Online Published: May 14, 2015 doi:10.5539/res.v7n7p173 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v7n7p173 Abstract The aim of the article is to identify the impact of Kazakhstan’s integration into the Eurasian Economic Community (EAEC) on the competitiveness of the country’s agriculture. To achieve target aim scientific works of foreign scholars on the problems of integration and its impact on the national economy have been analyzed. The study found that regional integration has positive and negative effects that can lead to further progressive development of the country and its industries, but also exacerbate existing conflicts and crises. To evaluate the adaptability of Agriculture of Kazakhstan to the country’s membership in the EAEC, indicators of industry competitiveness were analyzed: crop yields, livestock productivity, profitability, amount of state support, index of net exports, production of main agricultural products per capita. It was revealed that in agriculture of Kazakhstan competitiveness is lower than in Russia and Belarus in many positions.
    [Show full text]
  • AFT Phase I Evaluation July 2011.Pdf
    FINAL REPORT Evaluation of Component II of phase I of the Wider Europe Aid for Trade Project Aid for Trade in Central Asia: Support to Economic Development Along Trade Corridors Kazakhstan (Semey Region) Kyrgyzstan (Batken Region) Tajikistan (Sughd Region) By Alexander GRUSHEVSKY, „GEO Consulting“ July 2011 1 This Final Evaluation of Phase I of the UNDP project “Wider Europe. Aid for Trade in Central Asia: Support to Economic Development Along Trade Corridors” (Component II) was carried out between June 15 and July 31, 2011 with a field trip to Kazakhstan including the capital – Astana and the target areas in Eastern Kazakhstan (Semey and Ust-Kamenogorsk), Kyrgyzstan (Batken region) and Tajikistan (Khujand) undertaken on June 27 – July 10, 2011. This evaluation was conducted for the Bratislava Regional Office of United Nations Development Programme with the involvement of Country Offices in the above mentioned countries by Alexander GRUSHEVSKY, 770 Bay St. #2602 Toronto, ON, M5G 0A6 Canada; e-mail: [email protected] Acknowledgements The evaluator would like to express his gratitude and appreciation for the support provided by the AfT Project Team both in Bratislava and in the target countries. He would also like to thank all stakeholders and beneficiaries, who agreed to give interviews during the course of this mandate - the information and opinions shared have been crucial to the preparation of this evaluation. 2 Table of Content Executive summary ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russian-Kazakh Cooperation As a Factor in the Implementation of the Eurasian Idea
    Journal of Sustainable Development; Vol. 8, No. 5; 2015 ISSN 1913-9063 E-ISSN 1913-9071 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Russian-Kazakh Cooperation as a Factor in the Implementation of the Eurasian Idea Albert V. Beloglazov1 & Ildar G. Akhmetzyanov1 1 Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia Correspondence: Albert V. Beloglazov, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 420008, Kazan, Kremlyovskaya Street 18, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: June 2, 2015 Accepted: June 15, 2015 Online Published: June 29, 2015 doi:10.5539/jsd.v8n5p176 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v8n5p176 Abstract Conducted research is relevant due to the rapid development of integration processes at the post-Soviet space at the beginning of XXI century. The aim of the article is to analyze Russian and Kazakh collaboration as the driving force of Eurasian integration processes. The main method of the research of this issue is Eurasianism, through the prism of which Russian and Kazakh collaboration is under consideration. The results of the research prove the fact that Russia and Kazakhstan have lots of similar features and converging factors of geographic, historical, ethnic and confessional nature. The economics of the countries are inter-supplementary; their political approaches to the most global and regional issues are alike. In general Russia and Kazakhstan have not only good neighbourly and collaborating, but also inter-allied bilateral relations. This marks joint and active advance of Eurasian integration processes and the development of Eurasian idea in general. The materials of the article may be useful in conducting scientific research on the issues of external policies of Russia and Kazakhstan, providing lectures and seminars in training and planning specific measures on further advance of integration processes at the post-Soviet space.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitating Migration Management in North and Central Asia Migration Data Needs and Availability in North and Central Asia
    FACILITATING MIGRATION MANAGEMENT Working IN NORTH AND CENTRAL ASIA paper 3 Migration Data Needs and Availability in North and Central Asia 2 Facilitating Migration Management in North and Central Asia Migration Data Needs and Availability in North and Central Asia Report by Olga Chudinovskikh Title MIGRATION DATA NEEDS AND AVAILABILITY IN NORTH AND CENTRAL ASIA 3 The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The opinions and estimates set forth in this publication are the responsibility of the authors and should not necessar- ily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. 3 Series FACILITATING MIGRATION MANAGEMENT IN NORTH AND CENTRAL ASIA 4 Contents Introduction 5 Censuses as a source of information on international migration 11 Implementation of sample surveys to collect data on labour migration 23 Administrative data on migration 29 Concluding remarks 46 References 48 Annex 50 Title MIGRATION DATA NEEDS AND AVAILABILITY IN NORTH AND CENTRAL ASIA 5 Introduction 3 Series FACILITATING MIGRATION MANAGEMENT IN NORTH AND CENTRAL ASIA 6 s the role of international migration in the The development of statistics on international migra- modern world increases, its considerable tion in the countries of North and Central Asia,2 the Ascale and impact, both positive and negative, establishment of new sources and collection of new needs meaningful and, most importantly, informed types of data and a shift of interest from one type of policymaking.
    [Show full text]